Transcript

Overview of the RSACRP project

Road Safety Audit and Crash Reduction Workshop

Bandung, 27 & 28 May, 2011

Gerard Neilson

VicRoads International Projects

Team Leader, RSACRP Project (IndII #194)

RSACRP project

RSA - Road Safety Audits

CRP - Crash Reduction Programme

2

RSACRP project deliverables

RSA - Road Safety Audit

• 16 EINRIP Projects

CR - Crash Reduction

• CR reports for 30 sites on Jalan Pantura and Jalintim Sumatera

• CR engineering drawings and documents for implementation at 20 sites

3

4

Road Infrastructure Safety Management (RISM)

New Schemes Existing Roads

Road Safety Impact Assess-ment

Road Safety Audit

Road Safety

Inspection

Black Spot Manage-

ment

Network Safety

Manage-ment

(RIA) (RSA) (RSI) (BSM) (NSM)

Pro-active (prevention)

Re-active (cure)

5

RISM for Indonesia

New Schemes

Existing Roads

Road Safety Audit

Road Safety Inspection

Black Spot Management

(RSA) (RSI) (BSM)

Pro-active (prevention)

Re-active (cure)

6

RSA Crash Reduction

RSA Summary

16 RSA Reports

Lead auditors included Andria Fitra (1), Arief Rizaldi (1), Jany Agustin (3) and Victor Taufik (1)

6 reports being translated into Bahasa Indonesia

1 report was a desk-top study

7

How does RSA work?

RSA is a process to ensure that,

for road construction or re-construction projects,

road user safety is not unduly comprised by the design.

8

9

10

11

Why not make the RSA recommendations a permanent feature of future designs?

Often, RSA recommendations lead to a re-evaluation of design standards.

12

And what if the road is already under construction?

13

Suggested implementation process for the current 16 EINRIP Projects

14

EINRIP PMU

IndII

EINRIP Supervising Consultant

Subdit LKJ

Auditor RSACRP Project

Implementation process - Stage 1

1. Auditor delivers reports to Subdit LKJ, who issues reports to the PMU

2. PMU and Subdit LKJ have “closure meeting”, attended by the SKJ and RSEU staff who completed the site inspection

15

EINRIP PMU

Subdit LKJ

Auditor RSACRP Project

Purpose of closure meeting

NOT to discuss the merits of the RSA report recommendations;

but

to determine if there are circumstances or issues which may be relevant to or impact on the recommendations.

16

3. If the closure meeting determines that there are issues which may be relevant to or impact on the audit report recommendations, the Subdit LKJ mayissue a revised version of the report.

17

Implementation process - Stage 2

4. After consultation with IndII, the PMU informs IndII of its decision in respect to the audit report’s recommendations

5. The PMU directs the Supervising Consultant on how to proceed.

18

EINRIP PMU

IndII

EINRIP Supervising Consultant

RSACRP project - CR programme

CR - Crash Reduction

• CR reports for 30 sites on Jalan Pantura and Jalintim Sumatera

• CR engineering drawings and documents for implementation at 20 sites

19

Nearly half of all road accidents in Europe occur on the two-lane rural road network.

these roads have lower geometric design than higher order roads;

they are not as well maintained;

head-on & run-off-road accidents are frequent,

and linked to: • high speeds;

• dangerous overtaking;

• driver inattention;

• design constraints;

• sight restrictions; and

• roadside obstacles. 20

Blackspot definition

A blackspot should be defined as any location which:

has a higher expected number of accidents, than at other similar locations,

as a result of local risk factors.

RiPCORD-iSEREST project, European R & D project supported by the European Commission, 2005-2007.

21

is site

sites

Blackspot - a definition for Indonesia

A blackspot is defined as any site which:

has a higher number of accidents, than at other similar sites,

as a result of local risk factors.

A site may be either

• a location (a curve, an intersection, etc.), or,

• a route (typically 1 km to 20 km long). 22

Year Accidents Killed Seriously Slight

1992 19 920 9 819 13 363 14 846

1993 17 323 10 038 11 453 13 037

1994 17 469 11 004 11 055 12 215

1995 16 510 10 990 9 952 11 873

1996 15 291 10 869 8 968 10 374

1997 17 101 12 308 9 913 12 699

1998 14 858 11 694 8 878 10 609

1999*) 12 675 9 917 7 329 9 385

2000 12 649 9 536 7 100 9 518

2001 12 791 9 522 6 656 9 181

2002 12 267 8 762 6 012 8 929

2003 13 399 9 856 6 142 8 694

2004 17 732 11 204 8 983 12 084

2005 91 623 16 115 35 891 51 317

2006 87 020 15 762 33 282 52 310

2007 49 553 16 955 20 181 46 827

2008 59 164 20188 23 440 55 73123

24

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

persons killed

25

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

persons killed

14 years, 83% increase

Road casualties in France (1956-2005)

14 years, 83% increase

10 years 20 years

Three (of several) key provisions which will improve road user safety

• Provide sealed shoulders

• Provide delineation of the road alignment at bends and sharp curves

• Marking hazards, particularly the end walls on narrow bridges

27

Use of the road space

On developed networks:

In rural areas, vehicles travel in the traffic lane together with some motorcycles which travel at a similar speed to the vehicles. There are no pedestrians;

In urban areas, where there are pedestrians, they typically walk on footpaths which are separated from the traffic lanes by a kerb.

28

29

pedestrians

vehicles

motor-cycles

cross-section

30

Shared use of the road space

31

vehicles and motorcycles

motorcyclists

and pedestrians

pedestrians

32

traffic lane

Shoulders

33

traffic lane

3.5 m

shoulder

2 m

Shoulder looks like another traffic lane.

Shoulder is too wide and the outer edge

line is not needed.

34

Recommended carriageway widths

On Pantura and Jalintim, from a road safety perspective, the ideal road cross-section widths on 2-lane 2-way sections in rural areas are:

traffic lanes: 3.5 m each

shoulder: 2.0 m total each side, of which

• 1.5 m is sealed and

• 0.5 m is gravel

35

Carriageway width departures

carriageway element

ideal departure

traffic lane 3.5 3.0

shoulder 2.0 1.5

36

Culvert lengths

37

Thank you!

Gerard Neilson

VicRoads International Projects

Team Leader

IndII RSACRP Project

Jakarta, Indonesia

06 May, 2011.

38

top related