Outline • What is spintronics? And why? • Ferromagnetic ...reu.cct.lsu.edu/documents/TuesdaySeminars/REU10_Moreno.pdfOrganic-based Materials in Spintronics Advantages: • smoother

Post on 25-Jun-2020

0 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

New magnetic materials for SpintronicsJuana Moreno

Outline• What is spintronics? And why?• Ferromagnetic semiconductors• Organic magnets

What is spintronics? And why?

Spin-unpolarized current:Electrons move with random spin

orientation

Spin-polarized current:Electrons move with same spin

orientation

Why spintronics?We need faster, smaller, more efficient chips

By 2020 a transistor in a chip may reach the size of a few atoms. Electronics based on a new paradigm is needed!

Devices based on “static” spins

Giant magneto-resistance hard-disksGMR effect (1988)

IBM hard disk (1997)

[Prinz, Science 1998]

http://www.research.ibm.com/research/gmr.html

GMR introduction(advantage of using spin in devices)

Silicon technology(no equivalent change)

The advantage of using spin….

0.1 penny/MB!

Spin Field Effect Transistor

Datta-Das (1990)

Spin precession due to spin-orbit interaction with spin-orbit splitting controlled by gate potential

Devices based on spin-polarized currents

p- type n- typep- type n- type

Spin LEDH split the spin levels circularly polarized light.

+ - spin injector

-

-

++ -- spin injector

-

-

spin injector

--

--

Very small spin injections!

LB1

Slide 7

LB1 Rashba interaction is a "zero field splitting" wherein a gradient electric field can rotate the spins

in a typical FET, the gate controls the current flow by increasing or decreasing the size of the channel by controlling the size of the p-ndepletion region

in a spin FET, the gate controls the rotation of spin, where the drain senses the spin direction. For parallel alignment the resistance is low, for antiparallel resistance is higher

this method of rotating the spin takes very little energy so these devices are in theory much more efficient than present FETLuigi Batafuco, 10/28/2004

Electrical control of magnetization

H. Ohno et al., Nature (2000)

Photogeneratedmagnetism

Koshihara et al. (1997)

Some successes:

Large scattering at the interface between ferromagnetic metal-semiconductor due to conductivity mismatch.

• Metal devices don’t amplify the current.

• Mixed devices have problems with spin injection.

Solution: a magnetic semiconductor as spin-injector

• Easily integrated with current semiconductor technology

• Multiple functionality

• Amplification

Metal-semiconductor interface

Difficulties to build spintronic devices?

MnMn

Outline• What is spintronics? And why?• Ferromagnetic semiconductors• Organic magnets

Zener or double-exchange Hamiltonian

MnMn

H = H0 - Jc Σ Si σ(Ri)Ri

.

carrier dispersion Mn spin carrierspin

H = H0 - Jc

Carrier mediated ferromagnetism

Weak-coupling mean-field theory

[Dietl et al., Science (2000)]

Dietl’s theory is too simplistic to

analyze material properties.

2cc JT ∝

Room temperature

Tc (j) reaches a maximum for j = 3/2!

max

J. M, Fishman & Jarrell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 237204

Tc for carriers with angular momentum j

Model for GaAs must include two hole bands (j = 3/2) with light and heavy masses. Tc is suppressed due tomagnetic frustration.

N

N N

NCo

O

O

O O

Ni

Ni

N

N N

NCo

O

O

O O

Ni

Ni

O

O

N

N N

NCo

O

O

O O

Ni

Ni

N

N N

NCo

O

O

O O

Ni

Ni

O

O

O O O O

NiO O

NiO O

NiO

O

NiO

O

Outline• What is spintronics? And why?• Ferromagnetic semiconductors• Organic magnets

Organic-based Materials in Spintronics

Advantages:

• smoother interfaces• longer spin coherence lengths• more flexible metallicity range• scaffolding to hold metal centers• cheaper bottom-up fabrication• low-weight• mechanically flexible, ....

Disadvantages:• low conductivity• difficult to grow organic +metal• low-weight, ….

N

N N

NCo

O

O

O O

Ni

Ni

N

N N

NCo

O

O

O O

Ni

Ni

O

O

N

N N

NCo

O

O

O O

Ni

Ni

N

N N

NCo

O

O

O O

Ni

Ni

O

O

O O O O

NiO O

NiO O

NiO

O

NiO

O

GMR: Xiong et al., Nature (2004)

OLED: Salis et al., Phys. Rev. B (2004)

MTJ: Petta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. (2004)

TMR: Santos, Phys. Rev. Lett. (2007)

Non-Magnetic Organics in SpintronicsTC1

Slide 16

TC1 the first three examples are of GMR

(1) giant magneto resistanceAlq3 between LSMO and cobalt

(2) magneto resistance

(3) magnetic field dependent electroluminesencespin polarized organic light emitting diode

(4) octanedithiol between nickelCenter for Nanoscale Science and Engineering, 6/23/2006

Porphyrins & Metalloporphyrins

M etalloporphyrin

N i2+, Fe3+, M n3+,C o2+

N i2+, C o2+

P aram agnetic m etal centers

Magnetic Organic Semiconductors:

Q. Huo, Langmuir 2004, J. Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines 2005

Goldberg, Crystal growth & Design, 2004, 2006

N

N N

NCo

O

O

O O

Ni

Ni

N

N N

NCo

O

O

O O

Ni

Ni

O

O

N

N N

NCo

O

O

O O

Ni

Ni

N

N N

NCo

O

O

O O

Ni

Ni

O

O

O O O O

NiO O

NiO O

NiO

O

NiO

O

Co

Ni

Metalloporphyrin modeling

t1

Majidi, Moreno, Schwalm, Fishman (2007)

t2

t1

Majidi, Moreno, Schwalm, Fishman (2007)

Conclusions• Spintronics as a new paradigm for computer technology.

• Need for new spintronic materials:

• Dilute magnetic semiconductors

• Organic magnets

TeraGrid-CyberInfrastructure Partnership University of North Dakota Computational Research Center

Grants: EPS-0132289 & EPS-0447679 (NDEPSCoR)2005 ORAU Junior Faculty AwardDMR-0548011, OISE-0730290

Working assets: Unjong Yu (South Korea), Aziz Majidi (Yakarta, Indonesia),Brian Moritz (Standford/SLAC),Peter Reis, Majid Nili, Karlis Mikelsons (Georgetown), Karan Aryanpour(SUNY-Buffalo),Alex Brandt (MSU Moorhead), Mason Swanson (NDSU),Randy Fishman (ORNL), Mark Jarrell (LSU), Paul Kent & Thomas Maier (ORNL), Mark Hoffmann & Bill Schwalm (UND),Leigh Smith (Cincinnati), Qun Huo (U. Central Florida), Anthony Caruso (U. Missouri, Kansas City), Konstantin Pokhodnya (NDSU)

PIRE: Graduate Education and Research in Petascale Many Body Methods for Complex

Correlated Systems:A Collaboration with Partners in Germany

and Switzerland

Juana Moreno, Mark JarrellLouisiana State University

Karen TomkoOhio Supercomputer Center

In the USA:Louisiana State UniversityUniversity of North Dakota

Hillsdale CollegeOhio Supercomputer Center

Oak Ridge National Lab

In Germany:Max Planck Institute, Stuttgart

University of GőttingenTechnical Universit of

DortmundUniversity of Wűrzburg

In Switzerland:ETH, Zűrich

J

Participating Organizations

top related