Transcript

IT ADVISORY SERVICES

KPMG LLP

Oracle Governance, Risk and Oracle Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) OverviewCompliance (GRC) OverviewJune 2008June 2008

2

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Presenter Background – Philip McGivney

Philip McGivney

• Senior Manager – Pittsburgh, PA• 12+ years experience• Representative Clients

• Campbell Soup• HJ Heinz• Estee Lauder• SC Johnson• Shell Chemical• Duquesne Light• Regeneron• Independence Blue Cross

3

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Presenter Background – Jason Lindsley

Jason Lindsley, CPA, CISA

• Manager – Philadelphia, PA• Pennsylvania Oracle Product Champion• National Oracle GRC PMO Lead• 4+ years with KPMG’s Advisory Services• Representative Clients

• ARAMARK Corporation• CROWN Holdings, Inc.• IKON Office Solutions• Subaru of America• NRG Energy, Inc.• Regeneron Pharmaceuticals• Catalent Pharmaceuticals

4

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Oracle GRC POV Discussion Outline

KPMG Overview

• What is Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC)?• Broad Definition and Supporting Technology• Oracle GRC Application Suite

• Why is Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) important?

• Oracle GRC and Approach

5

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

KPMG’s Market Offering

What we do:

Our Global Lines of Business:

The Global Services we offer:

Who are our clients?Global, National and Middle Market entities

Controls Integration and OptimizationProject Execution AssistanceIS GovernanceChange ManagementSourcing AdviceSecurity & PrivacyAttestation SupportProcess Design

International Corporate TaxBusiness Tax Indirect TaxesPersonal Tax

Financial Statement AuditStatutory AuditAudit Related Services

Financial Services

Infrastructure, Government& Healthcare

Information, Communications& Entertainment

Consumer Markets

Industrial Markets

PrivateEquity

Business Case DevelopmentBusiness and Risk AssessmentsFinance TransformationBusiness IntegrationInvestigations (Fraud)Transaction Services

6

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Advisory Services Framework

Skills & CompetenciesSkills & Competencies

One : ManyOne : Many One : ManyOne : Many

Client Solutions – Skill B

undlingC

lient Solutions – Skill Bundling

Many : ManyMany : Many

Advisory Foundation M

ethodsA

dvisory Foundation Methods

Service Line Fundamentals

Service Line Fundamentals

Technical Skill SpecificTechnical Skill Specific

Internal Audit, RegulatoryInternal Audit, Regulatory& Compliance (IARCS)& Compliance (IARCS)

Financial RiskFinancial RiskManagement (FRM)Management (FRM)

Business PerformanceBusiness PerformanceServices (BPS)Services (BPS)

Transaction ServicesTransaction Services(TS)(TS)

Information TechnologyInformation TechnologyAdvisory (ITA)Advisory (ITA)

Forensic ServicesForensic Services

Advisory Service LinesAdvisory Service Lines

7

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

KPMG’s Global Reach

EMAEMAAfricaAfricaAustriaAustriaBelgiumBelgiumCyprusCyprusDenmarkDenmarkFinlandFinlandFranceFranceGermanyGermanyGreeceGreeceIcelandIcelandIrelandIrelandItalyItaly

Luxembourg Luxembourg MoroccoMoroccoNetherlandsNetherlandsNorwayNorwayPortugalPortugalSpainSpainSwedenSwedenSwitzerlandSwitzerlandTunisiaTunisiaTurkeyTurkeyUKUK

Africa sub regionAfrica sub regionAngola & MozambiqueAngola & MozambiqueBotswanaBotswanaGhanaGhanaKenya, Tanzania & UgandaKenya, Tanzania & UgandaMalawiMalawiMauritiusMauritiusNamibiaNamibiaNigeriaNigeriaSierra LeoneSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AfricaSwazilandSwazilandZambiaZambiaZimbabweZimbabwe

CEE sub regionCEE sub regionAlbaniaAlbaniaBulgariaBulgariaCroatia & BosniaCroatia & BosniaCzech RepublicCzech RepublicEstoniaEstoniaHungaryHungaryLatviaLatviaLithuaniaLithuaniaMacedoniaMacedoniaPolandPolandRomania & MoldovaRomania & MoldovaSerbia and MontenegroSerbia and MontenegroSlovakiaSlovakiaSloveniaSlovenia

CIS sub regionCIS sub regionArmeniaArmeniaKazakhstanKazakhstanRussia Russia UkraineUkraine

MESA sub regionMESA sub regionAfghanistanAfghanistanBahrainBahrainEgyptEgyptIndiaIndiaIranIranIraqIraqKuwaitKuwaitLebanonLebanonOmanOmanPakistanPakistanQatarQatarSaudi ArabiaSaudi ArabiaSri LankaSri LankaSyriaSyriaUAEUAEYemenYemen

TOG sub regionTOG sub regionAnguillaAnguillaBahamasBahamasBermudaBermudaCaricomCaricomCayman Islands & BVIsCayman Islands & BVIsChannel IslandsChannel IslandsIsle of ManIsle of ManMaltaMaltaTurks and Caicos Turks and Caicos IslandsIslands

AmericasAmericasArgentinaArgentinaBrazilBrazilCanadaCanadaCentral America (KCA)Central America (KCA)ChileChileColombiaColombiaEcuadorEcuadorIsraelIsraelMexicoMexicoNetherlands AntillesNetherlands AntillesPeruPeruUSUSUruguayUruguayVenezuelaVenezuela

ASPACASPACAustraliaAustraliaCambodiaCambodiaHong Kong / China SARHong Kong / China SARIndonesiaIndonesiaJapanJapanKoreaKoreaLaosLaosMalaysiaMalaysiaNew ZealandNew ZealandPhilippinesPhilippinesSingaporeSingaporeTaiwanTaiwanThailandThailandVietnamVietnam

Central America sub regionCentral America sub regionCosta RicaCosta RicaDominican RepublicDominican RepublicGuatemalaGuatemalaHondurasHondurasNicaraguaNicaraguaPanamaPanama

AmericasAmericas

ASPACASPAC

EMAEMA

No Member FirmNo Member Firm

8

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Oracle GRC POV Discussion Outline

KPMG Overview

• What is Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC)?• Broad Definition and Supporting Technology• Oracle GRC Application Suite

• Why is Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) important?

• Oracle GRC and Approach

9

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC)

• “Governance” is the management of strategic directives

• “Risk” is the effect of uncertainty on business objectives and risk management is the mechanism to improve performance while minimizing financial losses

• “Compliance” transcends focus on laws and regulations to encompass all facets that affect integrity, reputation and brand

• IT enabler - Oracle GRC fully deployed for maximum impact

• Other enablers include change management, performance and value measurement and management, and monitoring mechanisms

• GRC implementation is not about a single role in the organization that is responsible for everything related to governance, risk, and compliance

• GRC works best when multiple roles (e.g., corporate secretary, corporate compliance, enterprise risk, audit, IT, line-of-business, investigations, legal) work together in a common framework, collaboration, and architecture to bring an enterprise view across governance, risk, and compliance activities throughout the organization

10

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

KPMG Governance, Risk and Compliance Framework

Business Activity

Process Embedded Controls (manual, auto)

Financial Operational Regulatory

Company Level Controls

EntityEnvironmental Managerial

Risk Assessment

Risk Measurement

Risk Strategy

Risk Monitoring

Enterprise (Board, Operating Committee)

Functional (IT, Finance, Sales, etc.)

Managerial (Line Management)

Governance

Risk Management

Compliance and Controls

Info

rmat

ion

Strategy & Policy

11

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

CxO Visibility to enterprise GRC status Role-tailored analysis Flexible ad hoc reporting

Oracle GRC Intelligence

Indicators Attestations AlertsDashboards

Data repository GRC system of record End-to-end GRC process mgmt

Oracle GRC Manager

Audit Management Assessment

Issues & Remediation

Event & Loss Management

Risk and Control Frameworks

Configuration Controls

Transaction Controls

Continuous monitoring of access, policies and controls

Preventive and detective controls Controls risk monitoring

Oracle GRC ControlsAccess Controls

IT Manager

Information security Enterprise access provisioning IT configuration management

GRC Technology Enablers

InformationSecurity

Records & Digital Rights

ConfigurationManagement

Identity Management

Fina

ncia

l C

ompl

ianc

e

IT G

over

nanc

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l H

ealth

Ris

k M

anag

emen

t

Util

ities

& E

nerg

y

Com

mun

icat

ions

Ret

ail &

Con

sum

er

Goo

ds

Cor

pora

te

Res

pons

ibili

ty

Life

Sci

ence

s

Fina

ncia

l Ser

vice

s

Source: Oracle Corporation

Oracle GRC Application Solution provides the infrastructure to automate end-to-end GRC processes, including corporate governance and oversight, risk management, and compliance management and reporting

12

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Oracle GRC POV Discussion Outline

KPMG Overview

• What is Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC)?• Broad Definition and Supporting Technology• Oracle GRC Application Suite

• Why is Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) important?

• Oracle GRC and Approach

13

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Sarbanes Oxley changes the scope and magnitude of the Oracle Implementation Process

Sarbanes Oxley (SOX)

• SOX makes appropriate controls and security a business imperative

• SOX 404 mandates that controls be designed and operating effectively the year in which system and process changes occur. If not, significant deficiencies or perhaps an adverse audit opinion may result

• SOX created a greater focus on tax and new tax reporting requirements, i.e. FIN 48

• Companies are no longer willing to accept the risk.

Before Sarbanes Oxley, GRC integration would be postponed or ignored, as many companies chose to “accept the risk” on an interim basis.

Compliance

14

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Controls Transformation

Targeted Benefits

• Centered on migration from a mostly manual, detective control-based paradigm to one of a more automated and preventive nature

• Tax also adds value in this type of project by identifying complementary tax planning opportunities that may add additional value to the client

Objectives

• Drive both a “bottoms up” and “top-down” approach to analyze, evaluate, and design controls at the process level transformation across the enterprise and eliminate redundant processes, controls and data environments

• Seamless integration with a challenging organization

“Parallel path” project goal : Controls Transformation

Many companies still rely primarily on manual controls, which are generally detective in nature (i.e. after the transaction). Transformed companies maximize the use of automated controls, substantially reducing the cost of control. Automated controls are frequently detective controls (i.e. during the transaction) which yield better control assurance. The objective is to move from the lower left quadrant to the upper right quadrant.

Approach, Techniques and Process

Sustained Value and Confidence

Automated

Manual

Detective Preventative

Typical company controls

Improved company controls

15

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Pain Points addressed by GRC: Additional critical aspects supporting the need to integrate stronger controls in an ERP Implementation

Process-driven ERP systems require controls to be applied throughout business processes. Poorly designed controls or misplaced controls result in redundancy and higher costs.

1. Eliminate Redundancy and Reduce Cost

3. Retrofitting Controls is Cost Prohibitive

2. Manual Controls are Expensive and Inefficient

Existing key controls have deteriorated and are too manual. Organizations are experiencing high cost of controls and are looking to eliminate manual and redundant controls to reduce costs and improve process efficiency

The cost of rework for poor controls is exorbitant and can lead to a complete reimplementation of an ERP system that lacks controls. Improving financial controls in an ERP system must have controls designed and integrated throughout the organization. Given system configuration and employee training redundancies, redesigning controls at the end of an ERP implementation is inefficient, expensive and could result in reportable material weaknesses or deficiencies.

Controls

16

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Pain Points addressed by GRC: Additional Benefits of GRC Integration

Automation is driving ERP technology integration initiatives and helping to optimize controls within key processes, resulting in improved process efficiency, cost reductions and effective compliance management.

4. Automated and Preventive Controls

5. Complete and Accurate Financial Information

Organizations have long recognized the value of an efficient control structure and its role in driving complete and accurate financial information. When a new ERP system is implemented, along with the customary process changes, controls (including security) must be revised to support the new business and system functions.

Controls

We believe GRC Integration is critical and should to be addressed and integrated into an ERP implementation

17

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Key Lessons Learned and Leading Practices

• GRC integration is an area that is often poorly performed by project teams. Appoint a Security and Controls Lead on the project to create and maintain visibility of controls and security requirements throughout the duration of the project. Plan for the need to continuously educate the project team and stress the importance of the security and controls aspects of the system throughout the project lifecycle.

• Start early with Security and Controls…it is a lot of work. Involve your security and controls team in the early design stage of the project, and maintain their involvement through the entire project lifecycle.

• Security and Controls is a collaborative process that requires all parties to be engaged early including Business Process Owners (BPOs), IT and security teams, Internal Audit and your External Auditors.

• A key area that is often overlooked during an ERP implementation is tax. Incorporating the tax perspective into the project can help avoid costly rework and degradation in tax reporting needs.

• Determining the balance between preventive and detective controls can be challenging. Security, SOD and configuration controls are mostly preventive in nature. Manual controls can be more costly to operate/perform and are generally less reliable than automated controls. If correctly configured and managed, your new ERP system will provide numerous opportunities for organizations to have a highly automated control environment.

18

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Oracle GRC POV Discussion Outline

KPMG Overview

• What is Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC)?• Broad Definition and Supporting Technology• Oracle GRC Application Suite

• Why is Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) important?

• Oracle GRC and Approach

19

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

CxO Visibility to enterprise GRC status Role-tailored analysis Flexible ad hoc reporting

Oracle GRC Intelligence

Indicators Attestations AlertsDashboards

Data repository GRC system of record End-to-end GRC process mgmt

Oracle GRC Manager

Audit Management Assessment

Issues & Remediation

Event & Loss Management

Risk and Control Frameworks

Configuration Controls

Transaction Controls

Continuous monitoring of access, policies, and controls

Preventive and detective controls Controls risk monitoring

Oracle GRC ControlsAccess Controls

IT Manager

Information security Enterprise access provisioning IT configuration management

GRC Technology Enablers

InformationSecurity

Records & Digital Rights

ConfigurationManagement

Identity Management

Fina

ncia

l C

ompl

ianc

e

IT G

over

nanc

e

Envi

ronm

enta

l H

ealth

Ris

k M

anag

emen

t

Util

ities

& E

nerg

y

Com

mun

icat

ions

Ret

ail &

Con

sum

er

Goo

ds

Cor

pora

te

Res

pons

ibili

ty

Life

Sci

ence

s

Fina

ncia

l Ser

vice

s

Source: Oracle Corporation

Oracle GRC Suite

20

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Oracle GRC Controls – Access Controls

•Provide compliant user provisioning•Enforce compensating controls •What-if SOD risk simulation

• Analyze user roles and responsibilities for SOD violations

• Identify and remediate SOD violations

• Monitor activities of users granted access to sensitive areas

Access Controls

PreventiveDetective

Control Type

Oracle GRC Controls Module

21

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Oracle GRC Controls – Access Controls

• ‘N’ access point definitions

• Simple Operand Combinations – ‘X’ to ‘Y’

• Complex Operand Combinations –

• ‘X’ to ‘Y’ to ‘Z’ to ‘N’

• Inter-Operand hierarchy

• Seeded Entitlement based policies

• Oracle (11.5.10 and R12)

• PeopleSoft (8.8/9)

• Entitlement - Grouping of access points (similar to Entity Groups)

22

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Oracle GRC Controls – Transactional Controls

•Validation of transaction data (e.g. valid product code)•Approvals based on transaction data thresholds

• Identify transactions violating policy (e.g. un-approved vendor)

• Detect patterns representing aggregate risk (e.g. micro-payments)

• Detect correlation risk (e.g. same user creates and pays vendor)

Transaction Controls

PreventiveDetective

Control Type

Oracle GRC Controls Module

23

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Oracle GRC Controls – Transactional Controls

ENTERBad-DebtAccount

FinancialClerk

FinancialSupervisor

Bad DebtLedger

POSTBad-DebtApproval

Entry

Post

Post

Entry

GeneralManager

(P&L)

Yes

PreventivePolicy Control

Updates > ThresholdRequire Manager Approval

> $25K

NoApproved

Preventive Access Control

Unable to modify account numbers

! Reportable Event Risk

Excessive Debt

Control Monitors

PreventiveSOD

Controller

Exception Reporting

ExceptionRemediation

Source: Oracle Corporation

24

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Oracle GRC Controls – Configurable Controls

•Validate that setups and data updates conform to valid values•Require conditional approval cycles (e.g., exceed threshold)•Enforce data consistency; (e.g. force data to upper case)

• Detect and record changes to sensitive setup data

• Compare before and after values for changes

• Monitor for setup inconsistencies across multiple instances

Configuration Controls

PreventiveDetective

Control Type

Oracle GRC Controls Module

25

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Oracle GRC Manager

• Single system of record• End-to-end GRC process

management• Platform independent• Integrated control management• Closed-loop issue remediation

Certify

Respond

Analyze

Assess

Document

26

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Oracle GRC Intelligence

• Pre-built dashboardsaggregate informationfrom all sources

• Combine performanceand GRC information

• Respond to KRI and issues• Produce attestations

and disclosures• Configure to meet your

specific needs

27

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Preparationand Analysis

Design Build Test SustainEvaluation

Below is a list of typical key activities reflected in a Risk and Controls Framework

Key Activities• Project Management

Planning Activities

• Security and Controls Cutover Strategy

• SOX compliance accountability and Controls Portfolio

• Compliance monitoring and accountability for activities and responsibilities

• Security Role Design

• Quality Check with Stakeholders

Key Activities• Project Management

Planning Activities

• Business Process Procedures

• Configuration Element Documentation

• Data Quality Documentation

• Security Integration Documentation

• Quality Check with Stakeholders

Key Activities• Project Planning

Activities

• Establish Organizational Alignment Design

• Business Process Definition Standards

• Business Process Flow Standards

• Data Quality Standards

• Security Approach and Standards

• Quality Check with Stakeholders

Key Activities• Initial Project

Planning and Project Organizational Structure

• Project Documentation Standards

• Project Kickoff

• Quality Check with Stakeholders

Key Activities• Planning and

Project Initiation

• Risk Strategy and Risk Assessment

• Portfolio Analysis

• Qualitative Analysis

• Project Communication Plan

• Project Evaluation Checkpoint with Stakeholders

Key Activities• Project Monitoring

Support

• Project Organizational Structure Support

• Project Documentation Standards

• Quality Check with Stakeholders

28

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Oracle GRC Accelerators

KPMG's proven risk-oriented tools and controls integration methodologies identify, design, and standardize controls as part of the implementation process.

ERP Control Catalogs

Controls Portfolio Analysis Model

(CPAM)

Opportunity Analysis Model

(OAM)

Security/ Segregation of

Duties (SOD) tools

System Integration Controls Methods

Advisory Delivery Tool (ADT)

Tax User Requirements

Library

Tax Data Elements Library

Accelerators for Tax Provision

Non-proprietary tools

Enable the detail design of automated controls for

financial applications so that less efficient manual controls can be eliminated. Catalogs include testing guidance & procedures to support SOX

404 preparation & compliance

Help organizations to view and evaluate their controls portfolio. The model assists

companies in identifying opportunities to decrease costs, improve process

efficiency and evaluate the organization’s controls

portfolio holistically

Enables organizations to qualitatively assess process improvement

opportunities, based on a prioritization

framework, and a series of questions

KPMG use Oracle GRC or Oracle security development and

monitoring, and we leverage KPMG’s proprietary

Segregation of Duties Catalogs

and Templates

Primary business systems controls methodology,

guidance and supporting tools and templates used

by our joint teams in the execution of

controls integration

Methodology and Documentation Tool –

facilitates KPMG Advisory services execution, documentation and deliverables on an automated basis

Tax User Requirements

Library for each area of tax in

support KPMG GRC GTS

Tax Data Elements Library

for each area of tax

Accelerators for Tax Provision process redesign

KPMG can also utilize other automated security software and tools to support Oracle

GRC implementations

Oracle GRC Implementation Tools

29© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Presenter’s contact detailsPresenter’s contact details

Philip McGivneyPhilip McGivneyKPMG LLPKPMG LLP

(412) 576-7298(412) 576-7298pmcgivney@kpmg.compmcgivney@kpmg.com

Jason LindsleyJason LindsleyKPMG LLPKPMG LLP

(856) 373-0853(856) 373-0853jlindsley@kpmg.comjlindsley@kpmg.com

30

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Appendices

31

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

KPMG Advisory Services – System Design and Implementation

Scope and Plan Perform detailed scoping and planning of the project to identify activities, deliverables, project plan, milestones, and desired outcome (s).

DetectAssist in the validation of the compliance tool installation, review of segregation of duties controls, develop a customized set of prevention/detection rules (SOD rules, critical transactions, etc.) in your compliance tool and develop operational compliance and security provisioning processes.

Remediate Assist in the review and design of current security and automated control environment to develop and help execute strategy to remediate SOD conflicts and other control deficiencies.

MitigateAssist in the design and identification of mitigating controls for SOD conflicts and other control weaknesses deemed necessary, develop and execute strategy to configure mitigating controls in compliance tool and recommend a monitoring process.

Continuous Compliance Implement governance, control, and reporting process to maintain continuous compliance.

32

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Scope and Plan Phase

• Project Plan• Responsibility Matrix• Business Application System Security

and GRC presentation

Key Deliverables

• Not applicable for this phase• Secure project resources and contacts• Finalize and Develop Project Plan• Develop Project Responsibility Matrix• Deliver initial business system security

and GRC education• Hold steering committee project kick-off

Key Technology EnablersKey Activities

Purpose: This phase covers conducting detailed scoping and planning of the project against the signed LOE and its key deliverables, milestones, and desired outcome(s). It also includes securing and educating team resources (client + KPMG), outlining roles and responsibilities, and formally starting the project.

33

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Detect Phase

Purpose: This phase covers 1) finalizing the rule set to be used for Segregation of Duties (SOD) analysis and performing the baseline analysis, 2) modifying the SOD analysis system configuration settings, and 3) redesigning the access administration and compliance processes.

• Identification of Rule Set customizations• Design specification Document• Customized GRC Rule Files • Rule set maintenance procedure• Final custom Rule Sets• Updated business processes

and procedures• User guide and training documents• Management reports and preliminary

assessment of security environment

Key Deliverables

• 3rd Party controls software for segregation of duties

• 3rd Party controls software; Process controls functionality

• Determine to-be roles/responsibilities and processes and procedures for managing SOD conflicts

• Design and build company-specific SOD and Process Control Rule Sets

• Test SOD and Process Control Rule Set for completeness, accuracy

• Transport tested SOD and Process Control Rule Sets to production system

• Analyze SOD conflict baseline metrics, if applicable

• Conduct training for end users

Key Technology EnablersKey Activities

34

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Remediate Phase

Purpose: This phase covers remediating the SOD conflicts via security access and authorization changes in the Business Application system.

• Management and team phase kick-off presentations

• User access requirements• Remediation and security

design approach• Security design specifications• QA test scripts and test results• End-user training presentation• Cutover SOD conflict report• List of users with SOD conflicts

requiring mitigation• Incident tickets and tracking lists

Key Deliverables

• 3rd Party controls software for Segregation of Duties

• 3rd Party controls software; Process controls functionality

• Business Application System security features

• Identify users in scope and their reporting relationships

• Determine security design approach to remediate SOD conflicts

• Gather user access requirements• Convert requirements to security

design specifications• Remediate SOD conflicts through

building to-be user access• QA test to-be user access• Cutover to production system

with to-be user access• Train end-users• Hold go-live and support users

Key Technology EnablersKey Activities

35

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Mitigate Phase

Purpose: This phase covers mitigating remaining operational risks posed by remaining SOD conflicts. Determining and mapping the proper controls to mitigate these risks, as well as, configuring and maintaining the mitigating control records are performed in this phase.

• Management and team phase kick-off presentations

• List of users and SOD conflicts targeted for Mitigating Control

• Mitigating Control record mapping to users and SOD conflicts

• List of Mitigating Control monitors and approvers

• New business processes and procedures for managing MCs

• QA test scripts• End-user training presentation• Cutover SOD conflict report showing users

and risks marked by mitigating controls• Incident tickets and tracking lists

Key Deliverables

• 3rd Party Controls Software for Segregation of Duties

• 3rd Party Controls Software; Process Controls functionality

• Business Application System Security features

• Determine to-be roles/responsibilities

and processes and procedures for managing mitigating controls (MC)

• Document remaining SOD conflicts and users requiring mitigation

• Determine if underlying controls are sufficient and operate effectively

• Design and Build Mitigating Controls and map to users and SOD conflicts

• Test Mitigating Control records and their associations

• Cutover to production system• Train end-users• Deliver final SOD report

Key Technology EnablersKey Activities

36

© 2008 KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. 19045PHL

Continuous Compliance Phase

Purpose: This phase covers execution and monitoring of operational processes and policies to help ensure continuous compliance. Knowledge transfer is also performed in this phase between the project team and identified customer stakeholders.

• Knowledge Transfer Checklist• Security and Compliance Policies and

Procedures• Periodic review results appropriately

signed-off

Key Deliverables

• 3rd Party Controls Software• Business Application System

Security Features• Business Application System

embedded controls

• Perform additional knowledge transfer as necessary

• Refine and maintain policies and procedures

• Perform periodic review of security and compliance processes and user access

• Update Rule Set as Necessary• Periodically review mitigating control

effectiveness• Update mitigating controls content

and markings in SOD tool• Remediate or mitigate SOD conflicts

as required

Key Technology EnablersKey Activities

top related