Occurrences of priority substances in selected catchments

Post on 25-May-2015

81 Views

Category:

Environment

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

Occurrences of Priority Substances in Selected

Catchments

L. Jones, B. Kinsella, A. Furey, F. Regan

Outline •  Project aim •  Sampling plan and catchments •  Rainfall data •  PAH levels •  Total Suspended Solids

Project Outline •  Monitor   priority   pollutant   levels   in  wastewater  treatment  plant  ef4luents •  SPE,  GC-­‐MS,    LC-­‐FLD/MS,  ICPAES

•  Relate  levels  detected  to  emission  factors •  Population  equivalents,  rainfall,  traf4ic,  etc.  

•  Create   model/index   of   priority   substance  emissions   from   wastewater   treatment  plants

Priority Substances in Wastewater • Wastewater  major  point-­‐source   •  Responsible  for  localised  EQS  exceedances •  Often  upstream  of  drinking  water  abstraction •  Can  be  controlled •  Few  data  on  wastewater  PS  discharges   • Will  complement  storm  water  studies,  and  inform  targeted  PS  monitoring  

Sampling Site Overview

WWTPs •  Cork

•  Ballincollig •  Bandon •  Charleville •  Clonakilty •  Fermoy •  Mallow •  Ringaskiddy

•  Dublin •  Ringsend •  Swords

Site Overview WWTP Level of

Treatment Type of Treatment Agglomeration

PE Plant PE

Receiving Waters

Ballincollig Secondary Activated sludge (Aeration Basin)

16,339 15,000 Freshwater (R)

Bandon Secondary

Activated sludge (Oxidation Ditch)

8178 20,000 Freshwater (R)

Charleville Secondary 2,984 6,415 Freshwater (R)

Clonakilty Secondary 7,500-15,000 15,000 Estuarine Fermoy Secondary,

NR Activated sludge

(Oxidation ditches; anaerobic-, anoxic- and

aeration tanks) Phosphorous Removal

5,800 12,960 Freshwater (R)

Site Overview WWTP Level of

Treatment Type of Treatment Agglomeration

PE Plant PE Receiving

Waters Mallow Secondary,

NR Activated sludge

(Anaerobic-, anoxic- and aeration tanks)

Phosphorous Removal

7,091 12,000 Freshwater (R)

Ringaskiddy None None 14,864 0 Estuarine

Ringsend Tertiary Activated sludge (Sequencing Batch

Reactors) U.V Disinfection

2,870,333 1,640,000 Estuarine

Swords Secondary Activated sludge (Anaerobic-, anoxic- and aeration tanks)

50,000 60,000 Estuarine

SAMPLING PLAN

•  Populate model •  Temporal and seasonal variability •  Flexible

– DWF / WWF •  Monthly samples •  Intensive sampling

Rationale

Site Sample Type Timeframe (months)

Volume (L) Sample Breakdown

Ballincollig Grab 14 6.5

6 x 500 mL PAH analysis (3 filtered) 6 x 500 mL Pesticide analysis

(3 filtered) 500 mL Metals analysis

Bandon Grab 13 6.5

Charleville Grab 12 6.5

Clonakilty Grab 4 6.5

Fermoy Grab 13 6.5

Mallow Grab 13 6.5

Ringaskiddy Grab/Comp. 12 6.5

Ringsend Grab 25 12.5 6 x 1 L PAH analysis (3 filtered) 6 x 1 L Pesticide analysis (3 filt.)

500 mL Metals analysis Swords Composite 20 12.5

SAMPLING PLAN

Typical Sampling Campaign 2009 2010 2011

Month J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J

Ballincollig X

Bandon

Charleville

Clonakilty

Fermoy

Mallow

Ringaskiddy

Ringsend X X X X X X

Swords X X X X X X

RAINFALL DATA

Rainfall Stations

Dublin (Ringsend) Dublin

(Simmonscourt) Dublin

(Merrion Square)

Dublin (Ringsend) 1 Dublin (Simmonscourt) 0.66615 1 Dublin (Merrion Square) 0.89307 0.68413 1

Rainfall Data

  Mallow (Sewage Treatment Works) Mallow (Spa House)

Mallow (Sewage Treatment Works) 1 Mallow (Spa House) 0.37697 1

PAH OCCURRENCE

Anthracene

Fluoranthene

4.63

4.7 – 5.33

Naphthalene

3.3

Benzo(a)pyrene

5.97– 6.15

Benzo(b)fluoranthene

5.78 – 6.57

Indeno(1,2,3cd)pyrene

6.4 – 7.1

Benzo(k)fluoranthene

6.00 – 6.84 6.18 – 7.23

Benzo(g,h,i)perylene

PAHs and Log Kow Values

Parameter

Target  EQS

(µg  L-­‐1) LOD

(µg  L-­‐1) Frequency

N=33

Range

min max Naphthalene 1.2 0.0001 33 5.44  x  10-­‐4 1.69  x  10-­‐3 Anthracene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0005 33 <LOD 2.33  x  10-­‐2 Fluoranthene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0001 33 <LOD 1.89  x  10-­‐2 Benzo-­‐b/k-­‐fluoranthene Σ  3  x  10-­‐3 0.0001

15 <LOD 4.02  x  10-­‐2

Benzo-­‐a-­‐pyrene 5  x  10-­‐2 0.0005 12 <LOD 3.03  x  10-­‐2 Indeno-­‐1,2,3cd-­‐pyrene  /Benzo-­‐ghi-­‐perylene Σ  2  x  10-­‐3

0.0001 0.0005

21 <LOD 4.21  x  10-­‐2

Ballincollig June 2010 – May 2011

Bandon July 2010 – May 2011

Parameter

Target  EQS

(µg  L-­‐1) LOD

(µg  L-­‐1) Frequency

N=24

Range

min max Naphthalene 1.2 0.0001 24 <LOD 2.92  x  10-­‐3 Anthracene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0005 24 <LOD 1.10  x  10-­‐3 Fluoranthene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0001 21 <LOD 6.14  x  10-­‐4 Benzo-­‐b/k-­‐fluoranthene Σ  3  x  10-­‐3 0.0001 12 <LOD 1.84  x  10-­‐4 Benzo-­‐a-­‐pyrene 5  x  10-­‐2 0.0005 6 <LOD <LOD Indeno-­‐1,2,3cd-­‐pyrene  /Benzo-­‐ghi-­‐perylene Σ  2  x  10-­‐3

0.0001 0.0005 6 <LOD <LOD

Charleville August 2010 – May 2011

Parameter

Target  EQS

(µg  L-­‐1) LOD

(µg  L-­‐1) Frequency

N=9

Range

min max Naphthalene 1.2 0.0001 9 <LOD 2.98  x  10-­‐3 Anthracene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0005 9 <LOD 2.87  x  10-­‐3 Fluoranthene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0001 9 <LOD 1.44  x  10-­‐3 Benzo-­‐b/k-­‐fluoranthene Σ  3  x  10-­‐3 0.0001 3 <LOD 1.79  x  10-­‐3

Benzo-­‐a-­‐pyrene 5  x  10-­‐2 0.0005 3 <LOD 1.57  x  10-­‐3 Indeno-­‐1,2,3cd-­‐pyrene  /Benzo-­‐ghi-­‐perylene Σ  2  x  10-­‐3

0.0001 0.0005 9 <LOD 4.67  x  10-­‐2

Clonakilty April – May 2011

Parameter

Target  EQS

(µg  L-­‐1) LOD

(µg  L-­‐1) Frequency

N=6

Range

min max Naphthalene 1.2 0.0001 6 <LOD 1.67  x  10-­‐3 Anthracene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0005 6 <LOD 7.60  x  10-­‐4 Fluoranthene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0001 6 <LOD 2.34  x  10-­‐4 Benzo-­‐b/k-­‐fluoranthene Σ  3  x  10-­‐3 0.0001 0 nd nd

Benzo-­‐a-­‐pyrene 5  x  10-­‐2 0.0005 0 nd nd Indeno-­‐1,2,3cd-­‐pyrene  /Benzo-­‐ghi-­‐perylene Σ  2  x  10-­‐3

0.0001 0.0005 0 nd nd

Fermoy July 2010 – May 2011

Parameter

Target  EQS

(µg  L-­‐1) LOD

(µg  L-­‐1) Frequency

N=27

Range

min max Naphthalene 1.2 0.0001 27 <LOD 2.76  x  10-­‐3 Anthracene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0005 21 <LOD 1.52  x  10-­‐3 Fluoranthene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0001 24 <LOD 2.56  x  10-­‐4 Benzo-­‐b/k-­‐fluoranthene Σ  3  x  10-­‐3 0.0001 9 <LOD <LOD

Benzo-­‐a-­‐pyrene 5  x  10-­‐2 0.0005 6 <LOD 2.07  x  10-­‐2 Indeno-­‐1,2,3cd-­‐pyrene  /Benzo-­‐ghi-­‐perylene Σ  2  x  10-­‐3

0.0001 0.0005 9 <LOD 4.36  x  10-­‐3

Mallow July 2010 – May 2011

Parameter

Target  EQS

(µg  L-­‐1) LOD

(µg  L-­‐1) Frequency

N=30

Range

min max Naphthalene 1.2 0.0001 30 <LOD 3.00  x  10-­‐3 Anthracene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0005 21 <LOD 6.53  x  10-­‐4 Fluoranthene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0001 18 <LOD 7.36  x  10-­‐4 Benzo-­‐b/k-­‐fluoranthene Σ  3  x  10-­‐3 0.0001 12 <LOD 3.12  x  10-­‐4

Benzo-­‐a-­‐pyrene 5  x  10-­‐2 0.0005 9 <LOD 1.24  x  10-­‐3 Indeno-­‐1,2,3cd-­‐pyrene  /Benzo-­‐ghi-­‐perylene Σ  2  x  10-­‐3

0.0001 0.0005 15 <LOD 7.13  x  10-­‐3

Ringaskiddy June 2010 – Nov. 2011

Parameter

Target  EQS

(µg  L-­‐1) LOD

(µg  L-­‐1) Frequency

N=18

Range

min max Naphthalene 1.2 0.0001 18 <LOD 2.00  x  10-­‐2 Anthracene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0005 18 <LOD 5.79  x  10-­‐2 Fluoranthene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0001 18 <LOD 5.75  x  10-­‐2 Benzo-­‐b/k-­‐fluoranthene Σ  3  x  10-­‐3 0.0001 18 <LOD 5.48  x  10-­‐3

Benzo-­‐a-­‐pyrene 5  x  10-­‐2 0.0005 15 <LOD 8.98  x  10-­‐3 Indeno-­‐1,2,3cd-­‐pyrene  /Benzo-­‐ghi-­‐perylene Σ  2  x  10-­‐3

0.0001 0.0005 18 <LOD 4.91  x  10-­‐2

Swords Nov. 2009 – Aug. 2010

Parameter

Target  EQS

(µg  L-­‐1) LOD

(µg  L-­‐1) Frequency

N=72

Range

min max Naphthalene 1.2 0.0001 72 4.69  x  10-­‐5 6.26  x  10-­‐2 Anthracene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0005 72 <LOD 5.96  x  10-­‐2 Fluoranthene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0001 72 <LOD 3.42  x  10-­‐2 Benzo-­‐b/k-­‐fluoranthene Σ  3  x  10-­‐3 0.0001 66 <LOD 2.55  x  10-­‐4

Benzo-­‐a-­‐pyrene 5  x  10-­‐2 0.0005 63 <LOD 1.79  x  10-­‐2 Indeno-­‐1,2,3cd-­‐pyrene  /Benzo-­‐ghi-­‐perylene Σ  2  x  10-­‐3

0.0001 0.0005 66 <LOD 9.20  x  10-­‐4

Ringsend July 2009 – Aug. 2010

Parameter

Target  EQS

(µg  L-­‐1) LOD

(µg  L-­‐1) Frequency

N=96

Range

min max Naphthalene 1.2 0.0001 96 5.82  x  10-­‐7 5.37  x  10-­‐2 Anthracene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0005 96 <LOD 4.10  x  10-­‐2 Fluoranthene 1  x  10-­‐1 0.0001 96 <LOD 2.49  x  10-­‐2 Benzo-­‐b/k-­‐fluoranthene Σ  3  x  10-­‐3 0.0001 90 <LOD 1.51  x  10-­‐4

Benzo-­‐a-­‐pyrene 5  x  10-­‐2 0.0005 87 <LOD 9.02  x  10-­‐3 Indeno-­‐1,2,3cd-­‐pyrene  /Benzo-­‐ghi-­‐perylene Σ  2  x  10-­‐3

0.0001 0.0005 87 <LOD 5.74  x  10-­‐2

Flow and Rainfall

Rainfall and Total Suspended Solids

TSS  (mg  L-­‐1 )  and  Rainfall  (mm)  

Flow and PAH Concentration

Sept.

Summary - PAHs Dublin Cork

2 Sites 7 Sites

N=168 N =147

PAHs detected in all samples PAHs detected in all samples Exceedances at 1 site: Indeno-1,2,3cd-pyrene/Benzo-ghi-perylene

Exceedances at 5 sites: Indeno-1,2,3cd-pyrene/Benzo-ghi-perylene, Benzo-b/k-fluoranthene

Acknowledgements This project is funded by the EPA as part of the Science, Technology, Research and Innovation for the Environment (STRIVE) Programme 2007–2013. This programme is financed by the Irish Government under the National Development Plan 2007–2013. It is administered on behalf of the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government by the Environmental Protection Agency, which has the statutory function of co-ordinating and promoting environmental research.

top related