Noranda Mining and Exploration Inc. Joffre Property Magnetics … · 2017-01-17 · 41008NE0001 2 15922 JOFFRE l 010 Noranda Mining and Exploration Inc. Joffre Property Magnetics
Post on 25-Jul-2020
2 Views
Preview:
Transcript
41008NE0001 2 15922 JOFFREl
010
Noranda Mining and Exploration Inc.
Joffre Property
Magnetics and HLEM surveys
RFCESVfB
MAR 2, 7 1 935
MINING LANDS B^M^M
Rejean Pineault, Eng.
Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec
14 February 1 995
Table of ct 41008NE0001215922 JOFFRE 01OC
SUMMARY 2
INTRODUCTION ^ ' 3
PROPERTY 3
PAST WORK 3
ACCESS 3
FIELD WORK 4
HLEM SURVEY AND INSTRUMENTATION 4
MAGNETIC SURVEY AND INSTRUMENTATION 4
PRESENTATION OF RESULTS 5
MAGNETIC RESULTS 5
HLEM RESULTS 5
CONCLUSION 6
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
POCKET: TOTAL FIELD MAGNETIC SURVEY
HORIZONTAL LOOP ELECTROMAGNETIC 3555 HZ
HORIZONTAL LOOP ELECTROMAGNETIC 888 HZ
HORIZONTAL LOOP ELECTROMAGNETIC 222 HZ
Summary
Noranda Exploration Co., Ltd. of Timmins, Ontario, performed an exploration campaign on their Joffre Property in February and March 1993. The claims group is located in the North-East corner of Joffre Township, located approximately 100 km South-East of Chapleau, along the Canadian Pacific Railroad. The 1993 program evaluated the following: line cutting; HLEM; and total field magnetics.
The ground geophysics aimed to detect the presence of conductive sulphides in a volcanic environment. The occurrence of soil geochem anomalies represents a good indicator for such sulphides.
The HLEM survey outlined a weak electromagnetic conductor coinciding with a magnetic axis. The magnetics confirmed the North-South strike of the geology. Additional geophysics, namely Induced polarisation, is recommended prior to any diamond drilling of those conductors.
Introduction
In February and March 1993, Noranda Exploration Co., Ltd. completed a exploration program on their Joffre property, North-East corner of Joffre Township, in Porcupine Mining Division.
A previous geological reconnaissance mapping campaign had confirmed the presence of favorable volcanic units for the occurrence of VMS type deposits ( Noranda Exploration, Summer 1992). Felsic and mafic metavolcanic bands are interbedded with sericite schist, biotite schist garnets, and minor pyrite.
The objective was to detect the presence of electromagnetic conductors along the favorable felsic-mafic contact. The magnetics was carried out in order to assist the geological mapping, and to also to detect magnetite and/or magnetic sulphides such as pyrolite.
Property
The property is located in the North-East comer of Joffre Township, at approximately 100 km South-East of Chapleau, Ontario. The claim block # 1190904 consists of 10 units of 16 hectares, for a total of 160 hectares. Claim posts are delineating the block with a post every 400 metres on the perimeter of the claim group. Witness posts were used where the presence of lakes and/or streams exclude the possibility of normal staking. The staking sketch is included on the next page.
Past Work
There is no past work recorded in the assessment file of the Mine Office. The only public information available are the regional aeromagnetic of the GSC, and the geological compilation map of the Ontario Geological Survey.
Access
The property can be reached by Highway 144 and than through a forest road heading in the west direction ( Bisco road ). The access is possible with normal pick-up truck to the South-East comer of the claim block.
HOLLINGER TWP y/ J0/SO8 r
J.SV HJ.MON "* l /
to
J* J
/"
"I*
"'l
. *
O J
"P*W
T '
tocM
diSi
"^l
'rv..l
:3x^
X .2
2
HO
TCH
ION
H
lAN
OtO
IS
LYNC
H
JOFF
RE
Y G
RID
**h—
-HIT
T—
——
'(li
. l
/*.k,
.r.M
r. A
..,.,,,,,,,,,..
SCA
LE
11600000
Field work
The field work was performed by Rayan Exploration, from Timmins, Ontario, during Winter 1993, from February 20 to Mars 3, 1993. It consisted in 10.8 km of line cutting, 8.8 km of magnetics, and 8.8 km of HLEM. The presence of lakes and streams are reported on the grid lines. The CPR railroad and the access road are also outlined on the grid map.
HLEM survey and Instruments
The electromagnetic survey, namely HLEM, was carried out with an Apex Parametrics unit which consists of a receiver ( serial # 1040 ) and a transmitter, link together by a reference cable of 100 metres. The measurements represent the induced field in the subsurface, expressed in Wt of the primary field when the coil are maintained coplanar. Reading were taken every 25 metres systematically, on every line of the freshly cut grid.
During this survey, coils were both maintained horizontal, therefore they were not laying in the same plan where irregular topographic relief was present. It seems also that the nominal coils spacing of 100 metres was not constant throughout the survey. It generated "cable shortening" effects of fairly large amplitudes. For 1.0 metre of coils spacing variation (1.0 *X*) there is 3.0 Wi of difference in the reading of the in-phase component. The out-of-phase component is not affected by cable shortening and non-coplanarity of the coils.
Both effect are due to the relative position of both coils, and are purely geometric. Therefore, it reflects on each frequencies with the same amplitude in *fa of the reference field. Therefore, it is possible to discriminate between subsurface ( real ) conductors and geometrical conductors by comparing the response of the lowest frequency with the highest frequency (3555 Hz)
Magnetic survey and instrument
The magnetic survey was performed with a pair of magnetometers: a running unit; and a static unit, used as a base station. The latest was used in order to compensate for diurnal magnetic variations. Therefore, the final magnetic relief depends only on variations of the magnetic susceptibility in the subsurface.
The magnetometers are build by EDA Instruments, of Toronto. The running unit and the base station are both OMNI IV models. Readings were taken
systematically at 12.5 metres interval, at 2.0 metres above the ground level. The base station was monitoring the total magnetic field with a reading interval of 30 seconds.
Presentation of results
The results are presented on four maps included in this report. The scale is 1:2,500. Those maps are:
Drawing 3555-1: HLEM3555Hz Profiles888-1: HLEM888HZ222-1: HLEM222HZR136-M-1 Total field magnetics Contours
Magnetic results
The magnetics relief is fairly developed with amplitudes of 2000 nanotesla ( nt) above the background. Band of ultramafic intrusives and mafic metasediments are reported on the regional geological map of Noranda. The general strike is oriented in the North-South direction, similar to the inferred geology. All magnetic source dip steeply to the East (app. 750 ).
There is a perfect correlation between a magnetic axis and an HLEM conductor, on line 600N, SOON, and 1000N. The conductor will be described further. It is the strongest magnetic response observed on Joffre grid. The anomaly is likely caused by the presence of magnetite concentration, interbedded with minor conductive sulphides. Other mag highs are probably caused by mafic/ultramafic formations.
HLEM results
The HLEM survey allowed the detection of three bedrock conductors, all of poor conductivity. We also observe variations in the in-phase component that are likely caused by variation in the coils spacing as described above in the method description. Therefore, the interpretation of real conductors are based mainly on the out-of-phase response, which is independent of geometrical configuration of the coils.
Conductor A extends between lines 400N to 1400N. and stations 500E to 625E. There is a perfect coincidence with a mag high from lines SOON to 1000N. Because of the variations of the in-phase component, an exact evaluation of the conductivity-thickness product is not reliable. However, the out-of-phase
response suggests that we are dealing with a real bedrock conductor, despite the presence of a lake that extends with the same strike as the EM conductor.
Conductor B and C both extends in the western part of the grid, and correspond to the presence of a lake, such as for conductor A. In this case, however, there is no correlation with the magnetics. Therefore, the potential of those conductors for sulphides concentration is not as good as for the previous one. Any additional work on this anomaly would require more geological and/or geophysical support.
Conclusion
The actual geophysical campaign allowed the detection of weak HLEM conductors caused by the presence of minor sulphides in a volcanic environment. Since we are in presence of weak conductors, additional geophysical work would be recommended before any drilling of those conductors. An induced polarization survey would allow to test the real potential of those conductors.
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
l, Rejean Pineault, hereby declare that:
1. l am an exploration geophysicist with residence in Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec and am presently employed by Noranda Mining and Exploration Inc.
2. l am a graduate of Laval University, Ste-Foy, Quebec, in 1982, with a Bachelor's Degree in physical engineering.
3. l am a member of the Ordre des Ingenieurs du Quebec, and l am licensed to practice engineering in the province of Quebec, Canada.
4. l have practiced my profession continuously since graduation
5. l am member of the Association des Prospecteurs du Quebec, and ('Association des geologues et des geophysicien du Quebec.
6. l have no interest nor do l expect to receive any interest, direct or indirect, in the properties or securities of Noranda Mining and Exploration Inc.
7. The statement made by me in this report represent my best opinion and judgment based on the infomnation available to me at the time of writing this report.
May, 1995
Rejean Pineault, B. A. Se., P. Eng.Geophysicist
Ministry of ,Development
(Transaction Number
Ontario
Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim
Mining Act. . -. -. .-onthtoformtoottalnedundortweutlwrftyofttM
should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Mmtng Lands. MMstty of Northern Development and Mmss. Fourth Floor, 159 Cedar Street. 8urJbuns.Or**rlo,P3E6A4totopriom (706) 070-7264. O | C Q p O
Inatfuctlona: - Please type or print and submM In duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for reoju
Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be completed. Technical reports and maps must accompany thl ^moRN ——————————- A sketch, showing the claims the work is assigned m. must -——~~E - — — ^00
Tthjphons No.*gH-7MorGPtaiTNa
Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)Work Group
-GscsMhnlcaJ Survey0^*^*1^^! lAiMMvVrnyaicsj want. Including DfMJng•m-*- -^*M* ..-j-HafMDsnanon
OmerAulhorlzed Work
AssaysA.m.mB^BMB^Bm.ttfl*B) ftMMBhAMtgnfiMni ironi
Type
L.*!. ttfc^ *vp Ml* tt i* -HI.*. 1 SURvfcttr—1 RPrpiyjr^r. !' "" j
; MAK z i L.JO i———————————————————— j —————— s-
\ MINING^ Ah ..js i- ;.
Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of CostsNote: The Minister may reject for assessment work creoTt aJ or part of the assessment work submMt^ M the recorded
hoMer cannot verify expendttures claimed hi the statement of coats within 30 days of a request for verification.
Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address o* Author of Report)Name AdoiOM
C*?L4Ct.WTV*fl) Irm hofUUvV P-4V 16-2-
(attsjcti a echeduto If neceaaafy)
fi— -ajiin aaiaaaa ^M0 "^— — — "— "— *vei uiicaiion or Denvnciai ^^.^. ftl^Mft^ M^^ 4 ju* MIM. tj a g^ maee iwne NO* i on iweraa)f certtfy that at the time the i •VM pSflOniWO, atlD CWntt COVWiM fei ttlw WOffc
l In the current hokfsr's name or haU under a benstcW mtorestby the current recorded holder.
Certification of Work Reportl certify that l have a personal knowledge of me facto set forth hi this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or aner •s completion and annexed report is true.
and of Pereon Certifying 0**-*-** AuIM^P.*\KIP*V
/y /f /jFor Office Use Only
OM1IBM1)pQyj IPIME MINING DIVISION
Details for Dork Report l NEONT95.020 Page l
Work Reportl for Applying
Reserve
*.- ————— —————
4 ————————— ———
t ——————————— —
4 ——— ——— ——— —
* ——————— —————
4 ————————— ———
4— ——————— ———
1..............
l..............
Claii Nuiber (see note 2)
i ——————
|P 1,190.904
^ ——————
^ ——————
^ ——————
i. ——— ——
i. ——————
^ ————————
^ ————————
^ ————————
,............^ ———————
i. — ——— ——
^ ————————
y ————————————
^ ———————
t ———————
^ ————————
^ ————————
i. ————————
,————^ ————————t ————————
t
lof ClaiiUnitst — ,.
10
^ ———
f. ——
^ ———
t — .-
f ———
, — -.
i. ———
,—
h ———
,
^ ———t
,
t
4
1
1
1
h
l
k
^
t
,t
Value of Assesient Vork Done
on this Claii t ——— w. ———
5,424.00t — — — -----. ——
t —— ——————
i —————————
L- ————————————————— —— --
h
^ ——————————————————————————
h —————————————— ———————————
^ ————— —— ————
i ————————————
y ————————————
^ ———————————
5,424.00
Value Applied to this Claii
h —————————
5,424.00 ^ —————————— .
t.-.-. —— —— —— .
i. — —— ——————
^ ————— —————
t ——— —— ———— ..
t ————————— —
j ————————— —
i.- ——— ——————
( . —— —— —————
^ ———— ——————
i — —————————
^ ——— ————————
* —— —— ~ ~ —— —— f H
^ ———————————
i. —————— ————
^ ———————————
^ ———————————
^ ———————————
^ ————————— —
f ———————————
5,424.00
'
i
t'
-
ti
k
t
t
t^
t-.----------.......Values Assigned froi this Claii
i — ——— ———
2 ^—-."1
i... — —————
i. ————————
i ————————
^ ————————
k ————————
^ ———————————
f"-"---"^"""
j
i MAR 3 7 Mj
1^- lvl 11*111 *J 1.MI ' JO D
l..................j —————————
0.00
Reserve:Mork to be Claiied at
a Future Date
, ————————————— ——— 4
1. ————————————————— i
O *7 ^ H
. —————— ———————— ——— 4
. ——————————————————— t
,..................i
^ ——————————— —4
t ————————————————— 4
t —————————— —
h ———————————
i. ——————————— H
tcT.1 .i- -*~ ~ — — r ————— *l-o ; i. ————— 4L Jp WI1wr7 j f
\ * * * ^
^ ——————— .I.. _ —..1
j ——————— .
i ——————— 4 0.00
Total Nuiber of CI aiis
Total Value (fork Done
Total Value york Applied
Total Assigned Froi
Total Reserve
Credits you are ci ailing in this report tay be cut back. In order to liniiize the adverse affects of such deletions, please indicate froi which claiis you irish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please lark (x) one of the following: 4-41.| l Credits are to be cut back starting Hith the claiis listed last, working backwards.
4-4 f-*
2.j j Credits are to be cut back equally over all claiis contained in this report of work. 4-4 4-4
3. j l Credits are to be cut back as priori zed on the attatched appendix. 4-4 4-4
4.|x| Credits are to be cut back starting with the claiis that have reserve credits.4-4
In the event that you have not specified your choke of priority, option one will be iipietented.
Sets 1: Exasples of beneficial Inte-est are unrecorded transfers, option pa/tents, *:9ors;-.d^i of agreejents, etci-'* r .espect to the i : iivc :Vi:.
'".z 2: I f ijrk ra: been perfo-.'Ti ;- patentee C' "fired Tare, p'e*;e coa^'e'.e t~e •;";*: n::
rertifyr that the recorded holder -;d a beneficial interest in (Signature e patented or leased land at fie liae the wcrk *ds perforied. |
j Dst e
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Development
•and Mines
Ministere du Devetappement du Nord et des mines
Statement of Costs for Assessment CreditEtat des couts aux fins du credit devaluation
Mining Act/Loi sur tea mines
Transaction NoJN0 de transaction
U) q S l O. fi O Q
Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the MMng Act. This information wil be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining daim(s). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager. Minings Lands. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. 4th Floor. 159 Cedar Street. Sudbury. Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 870-7264.
Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presente formuto soot recueillis en vertu de la Lot eur toe mines et servirent a tenir a jour un registre des concessions minieres. Adresser toute quesiton sur la coftace de ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains miniers. ministere du Devetoppement du Nord et des Mines, ISO. rue Cedar. 4* etage. Sudbury (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.
1. Direct Costs/CoOts directs
Type
^•faw^akA
Contractor's
OraNade
at d* I'expert-
ftaafMyBaaA Uaaflall
Foumlture*
Rental Location de^M^d^aeWInMIVfMn
Description
Labour Main-d'oeuvreField Supervision Supervision sur le terrain
Type L*. -rife^-JillH
Type
Typa
Amount Montant
*]66
4 W"
Total Direct Costs Total de* cout* directs
Totals Total global
20.'
4W^
545V.'
2. Indirect Costs/CoOts indirect*** Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not
Pour leremboursement des travaux de rehabilitation. les couts tndvBCts 00 sont pss BdnnMsbtes 60 twit quo travsux d'eVaJuation.
Type
Nourrttureet
DoniipuoiiType
Amount
LAli-JTotal of Indirect Coat*
Total partial daa coots Indirect*Amount Aftowabte (not greater than 20H of Direct Costa)MonteVtt ftdnlSeribto (n*txc*MMit pM 20 ^fc dM coOts directs)Total Value of ASM (ToM ef Obect end
Totals Total global
Note: The recorded holder wil be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification. If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.
Note : l^titulaireenregistre sera lenu de venter tosto present etat des couts dans tos 30 jours suivant une demande a cat effet. Si la verification n'est pas effectuee. le ministre pout rejeter tout ou une partie des travaux d'evaluation presentes.
Fling Discount*
1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at HXWfe of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.
1. Les travaux deposes dans tos deux ans suivant tour achevement sont rembourses a 100 * de la vateur Mate susmenoonnee du cfedMtfevaluaiion.
2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at SOto of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations betow:
Total Value of Assessment Credtt Total At mt Claimed
x 0.50
2. Les travaux deposes trois. quatre ou cinq ans apres tour achevement sont rembourses a 50 4fe de la vateur totato du credit d'evaluation susmenrJonne. Voir tos caJculs CHtessous.
Vateur totato du credit d'evaluationx 0.50
ution mate dec MttC
Certification Verifying Statement of Costs Attestation de I'etat des couts
l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred white conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.
that
to make this certification
l am authorized
J'atteste par la presente :quo tos montants indiques sont to plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer tos travaux d'evaluation sur tes terrains indiques dans la formute de rapport de travail ci-joint.
Et qu'a litre de ___________________ je suis autorise (titulaire enregistr*. reprtsentanl. poota occup* dans la compagnie)
A faire cette^atte^lation.7 T i
0212(04/91) catle formuto. Mrsqu'M destgne des personnes. to masculin est utilise au sans neutre.
OntarioMinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ministers duDeveloppement du Nord et des Mines
Geoscience Approvals Section 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5
Telephone: Fax:
(705) 670-5853 (705) 670-5863
June 6 , 1995 Our File: 2.15922 Transaction #: W9560.00043
Mining RecorderMinistry of NorthernDevelopment fc Mines60 Wilson Avenue, 1st FloorTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7
Dear Mr. White:
Subject: APPROVAL OF ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS ON MINING CLAIM 1190904 IN JOFFRE TOWNSHIP
All the deficiencies outlined in the Notice of Deficiency date April 03, 1995 have been corrected. Accordingly, assessment vork credits have been approved as outlined on the Report of work form. The credits have been approved under Section 14 (Geophysical) of the Mining Act Regulations.
The approval date is May 18, 1995.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Steven Beneteau at (705) 670-5858.
ORIGINAL SIGNED BY: Yours sincerely.
Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section Mining and Land Management Branch Mines and Minerals Division
SBB/dl
cc: Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario
Assessment Files Library Sudbury, Ontario
N) o
o
V) x
m 33 m
i—
-"
?s;
i si
nog;
m s
- 5
m o
m
< m B -Q Z. m TJ r~
! -!
g*
fcf^
iO
. o
CO li
i^ ^
r* r*M
atBs
a.•D ^ rn
o '.
njz
wm
WX
35=
5 -o
iog
li^l
s^
S 5
lwOD
00
- -a .0
S
S0
,H*
S 5^
3 i
3-"13
^B
s'lf
S—i
^(
— 3
o *
* aj
3-f
r co
xr
?l^S
crc B
lll^
lgi
^i
C ~
-y
^ O
O
l3J
^ O
T33
* e g
o
m
3i H O >
H m
IO '
o,o
ow
i0"?
"d
igg ?.l
CD
mi r
z
W n
—
S rn
CO "
^1
55g
z m
H
to o
i
f o.
COm
e5 !q
^5*
'^^
W5
9
W ^
!lg
z
i^o
-i
.n
o
m O > H m
o
o (O ^ o
C/)
So "si
fc- VR
I
*0
" m
O
)
r
z
ni 5 (O
m Tl m 70 m z o m en
(O
f rO to
HA
LL
TOW
NSH
IP
0=71
5
H K H i z s ^3
P3 "H i z C/9
ffi
d M
I
-
33C
2
o c
"O ?
O 2
C-
O z
X 2
Q
33 r
> *
W
O l c? ro
OD-r
C
^ -
-C
- o
o
m z
l sl f 7) •\3
g o mn
H
.z|
o z
o ^ li* o (fl mI*
Ei
O
Om
mg
?x
z3
5 x
x x
SB
S 5
on"
m m
m 5
-
m
en i o
-
x
o
CO
o n
Sfj
x
o CO
lC
30
tt
CB O
o CO m l m
o o
?o
o
CD
-HC
o
m
m
o
en^r
^
r r- m z C
3
H
m—
P
m O
3;i-
n n
i -
n
"" ^ ^
n3"
^ ^ ^ i
tp
n
3
^
-c^
—
O
O
>
—
C
d o
H -
o
as (A '(tt -It :'fc
*-: H
H -1 r
,;^i
H
?
o m
o
CO
O
!
m z D
l
m CD ro
i to O)
(DTO m
s (o
X
M
m
W
CD'
3S
w -s O)
- m
z o
OO
ro P S
ex
z ^
xm
g
me
S?
H H 2
C/5 C m ^ O)
Sg
o
eo S m
SP m
o COm
-^ m
>
w e
n TT
OD o
m
ro c
to
w w
' n
03 —
TZ
OD i
gK?
3SP
in g O X
! rr CO
H O 13 O o i
K
m -n rn si m z o m en
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
BL 0
LAKE
b. l
32
LEGEND
INSTRUMENT: EDA OMNI PROTON PRECESSION MAGNETOMETER
PARAMETERS MEASURED: EARTH'S TOTAL MAGNETIC FIELD (NANO-TESLAS)
READING INTERVAL: 12.5 METERS
CONTOUR INTERVAL: 50 NANO-TESLAS
DIURNAL CORRECTION METHOD: RECORDING OMNI BASE STATION
DATUM SUBTRACTED FROM ALL PLOTTED READINGS: 5700Z nT
!00 l Z) (Z) 0 l 00 l 50 200
Client: NORANDA EXPLORATION LTD.Property: JOFFRE GRIDTitle: PROTON MAGNETOMETER
SURVEYProcessed:
R.J. MEIKLE
Dote:FEB. 1993
Provlnee: ONTARIO
Scale:l:2500
Checket RJM
Township:JOFFRE
N.T.S.
Draw ing:R136-M-1
RAYANEXPLORATION LTDCONTRACT/CONSULTNG GEOPHYSICS
TIMMINS. ONTARIO
(705)-268-4066
41OOBNE0001 2 15922 JOFFRE 210
800
700 E
600
500
400
LAKE
300 E
200 E
100 E
BL 0
siC\J
.J
CD CD C\J CD C\J
PROFILE SCALE: ten s 107.
r30
ONINIW
S661 i Z iH/W
S86ST*IN PHASE
-30 -40
-l
QUADRATURE
LEGEND
METHOD: Horizontal Loop MODE: Maxnun Coupled INSTRUMENT: Apex Max-Mm B SERIAL No. 1040 COL SEPARATION: 100 Metres READING INTERVAL: 25 Metres FREQUENCY: 222 Hz . CONDUCTOR AXIS
GOODMEDIUMPOOR
!00 l 00 100 150 200
Client: NORANDA EXPLORATI ON LTD.Property:
IHPuUr T ni LJ
TitliHORIZONTAL LOOP SURVEY
222 H:HZ.Processed:
R.J. MEIKLE
Dote :FEB. 1993
Province:ONTARIO
Scale: l:2500
Checke RJM
Township:JOFFRl
N.T.S. :
Drawing:222-1
RAYAMEXPLORATION LTDCONTRACT/XX^NSLLTNO QEOPHY9CS
TIMMINS. ONTARIO
(7051-260-4866
IED001 2 15922 JOFFRE 220
10
BL 0
PRCFLE SCALE ten * 107.
iiiir T^ i i i40 30 20 W O -C -20 -30 -40
X
o: o
O O
-l
IN PHASE QUADRATURE
-EGEND 159 2 2
METHOD: Horizontal Loop MODE: Maxmun Coupled INSTRUMENT: Apex Max-Mm B SERIAL No. 1040 COIL SEPARATION: 100 Metres READING INTERVAL 25 Metres FREQUENCY: BBB Hz. CONDUCTOR AXIS
RECEIVED"
MAR 2 71995
MINING LANDS PDA Nr([
GOODMEDIUMPOOR
i 130 0 50 100 150 200
Client: NORANDA EXPLORATION LTD.Property: JOFFREY GRIDTitl. HORIZONTAL LOOP SURVEY
888 HZ.Processed:
R.J. MEIKLJE
Date:FEB. 1993
Province: ONTARIO
Scal: 2500
Checked RJM
Townshlr JOFFRE
N.T.S.
Drawing:BBB-1
RAYAN,EXPLORATION LTDl CONTRACT/CONSIJLTNG GEOPHYSCS
TIMMINS. ONTARIO
(7051-266-4866
41O08NEOD01 2 15922 JOFFRE 230
s CD C\l CD CD C\J
112(2
PROFLE SCALE: lcn = 107.
O -W -20 -30 -40
IN PHASE QUADRATURE
'2.15922.EGEND
METHOD: Horizontal Loop MODE: Maxlnun Coupled INSTRUMENT: Apex Max-Mln II SERIAL No. 1040 COL SEPARATION: 100 Metres READING INTERVAL 25 Metres FREQUENCY: 3555 Hz. CONDUCTOR AXIS
GOOD —————MEDIUM ————POOR — -——
RECEIVED
MAR 2 7 1995
N C non-coplananty of coils
S H. shortening of coils spacing
l 122) 2) l 2)12 l SE)
Cli •nt: NORANDA EXPLORATION LTD.JOPPREY GRIDProperty:
Title: HORIZONTAL LOOP SURVEY
3555 HZ.Processed:
R.J. MEIKLE
Dote:FEB. 1993
Prov i nee: ONTARIO
Scale:1:2500
Checked RJM
Township:JOFFRE
N.T.S.:
Drawing:3555-l
RAYANEXPLORATI ON LTDCONTRACTxCX)r*SUL.-rrJG QEOPHYSCS
TIMMINS. CMSfTARIO
t705)-26B-4866
41O08NE0001 2 1 5922 JOFFRE 240
top related