NO-He collisions: First fully state-selected differential cross sections obtained with ion imaging A.Gijsbertsen, H. Linnartz, J. Klos a, F.J. Aoiz a,
Post on 27-Dec-2015
213 Views
Preview:
Transcript
NO-He collisions:
First fully state-selected differential cross sections obtained with ion imaging
A.Gijsbertsen, H. Linnartz, J. Klosa, F.J. Aoiza,E.A. Wadeb, D.W. Chandlerb and S. Stolte
Department of Physical Chemistry,
De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam
vrije Universiteit amsterdam
aDepartamento de Quimica Fisica, Facultad de Quimica,Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, SpainbCombustion Research Facility, Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, California 94550
• Introduction• Ion imaging• NO-He experiments• Differential cross sections• Conclusions and outlook
Outline
Introduction
La se r b e a m
Prim a ry b e a m va lve (16 % N O /Ar)
Se c o nd a ry b e a m Va lve (Ar)He xa p o le sta te se le c to r
Le ns syste m a ndp ho to m ultip lie r
O rie nta tio n fie ldLig ht b a ffle s
oriented 21/2 NO ( j = ½, = -1) + R
21/2 NO ( j’,’,’ ) + R
With R = Ar, He, D2,...
Sif
Sif
NO-Ar, Etr 500 cm-1
NO-He, Etr 500 cm-1
Introduction
Introduction
Fluorescence measurements provide only total collision cross sections, we also want to measure differential cross sections to:
• Get a better insight on the origin of the “steric effect”.• Test He-NO PESs. • Focus on effect of parity breaking and conservation on the differential cross section.
j’=7.5
Westley et al., J. Chem. Phys. 114, 2669 (2001)
Differential cross section He-NO (Sandia)
Introduction
Th.
Ex.
Improvements to the experimental setup:
• Ion imaging detection (differential cross sections)
• More powerful excimer pumped dye laser (to do 1+1’ REMPI, 226 + 308 nm)
Introduction
NO source chamber
He source
XeCl excimer laser
dye laser
308 nm, 5 mJ
226 nm, 1 mJ He
Hexapole
NO
collision chamber
Experimental setup
Hexapole state selected NO collides with He at Ecoll 500 cm-1:
Crossed 1+1’ REMPI detection
excitation 226 nmionization 308 nm
NO (j=½, =½, =-1) NO ( j’, ’, ’ )
Ion imaging
Ion imaging:
Measure a velocity distribution for every rotational state of the NO molecules after collision.
++
+
+
+
-
-
-
-
MCP + Phosphor screen
+
+ CCD camera
velocity mapping
ions
Extractor MCP's
+
velocity mapping
ions
Extractor MCP's
+
velocity mapping
ions
Extractor MCP's
+
velocity mapping
ions
Extractor MCP's
+
velocity mapping
The velocity distribution is recorded with a CCD camera. Ion images show the angular dependence of the inelastic collision cross sections of scattered NO (j’, ’, ’) molecules.
50
100
150
200
250
300
150 200 250 300 350
200
250
300
350
400
450
Experiments
To test our setup, some 2% NO was seeded in the He beam.
The NO beam consists of 16 % NO in Ar.
This image reflects the velocity distributions for both our pulsed beams.
vNO
vHe
Voltages: Vrepellor = 730 VVextractor = 500 V
Sensitivity: S = 7.7 m/s / pixel
NO beam velocity: vNO = 590 +/- 25 m/s He beam velocity: vHe = 1760 +/- 50 m/s
Images are: - 80 x 80 pixels- averaged over 2000 laser shots (@ 10 Hz)
Some parameters
Forward scattering ( = 0): Backward scattering ( = ):
vNO
vHe
*
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2.5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5 j’ = 5.5 j’ = 6.5
j’ = 7.5 j’ = 8.5 j’ = 9.5 j’ = 10.5 j’ = 11.5 j’ = 12.5
*
Parity conserving: p’ = p = - 1
Experiments
*Marked images are from Q-branch transitions that are more sensitive to rotational alignment and show more asymmetry.These images were omitted for the extraction of the DCS.
Experimentally obtained NO-He differential cross sections are compared to recent Hibridon CC calculations using Vsum and Vdif on a RCCSD(T) PES (Klos et al., J. Chem. Phys. 112, 2195 (2000))
Experimentally obtained dcs’s are normalized on the (theoretical) total cross section.
0 50 100 1500
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]0 50 100 150
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
0.05
0.1
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
0.05
0.1
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]0 50 100 150
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]0 50 100 150
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
2
4
6
8x 10
-3
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
2
4
6
8x 10
-3
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
2
4
6
8x 10
-4
[o]dc
s [
A2 ]
TheoryExperiment
j = 1 j = 2 j = 3 j = 4
j = 5 j = 6 j = 7 j = 8
j = 9 j = 10 j = 11 j = 12
Experiments
Parity conserving: p’ = p = - 1
*****
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2.5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5 j’ = 5.5 j’ = 6.5
j’ = 7.5 j’ = 8.5 j’ = 9.5 j’ = 10.5 j’ = 11.5 j’ = 12.5
Parity breaking: p’ = - p = 1
Experiments
0 50 100 1500
1
2
3
4
5
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
1
2
3
4
5
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]0 50 100 150
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
0.02
0.04
0.06
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]0 50 100 150
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]0 50 100 150
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
1
2
3
4x 10
-3
[o]dc
s [
A2 ]
0 50 100 1500
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
0 50 100 1500
1
2
3
4x 10
-3
[o]
dcs
[ A
2 ]
j = 1 j = 2 j = 3 j = 4
j = 8 j = 7 j = 6 j = 5
j = 9 j = 10 j = 11 j = 12
Experiments
Parity breaking: p’ = - p = 1
NO-He P12 (’=3/2, ’=1)
15-03-2004
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2..5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5 j’ = 5.5 j’ = 6.5
j’ = 7.5 j’ = 8.5 j’ = 9.5 j’ = 10.5 j’ = 11.5 j’ = 12.5
Conclusions and Outlook
1. Ion imaging setup works very well.
2. The use of a hexapole makes crossed beam ion imaging experiments more sensitive and easier instead of more difficult.
3. Our experimental results overall agree with quantum calculations. They show slightly more forward scattering.
4. A propensity rule for the DCS is seen experimentally.
5. Measurements of orientation dependence of the DCSs will be attempted.
6. Is it possible to invert oriented DCSs to PESs?
Questions?
j’ = 4.5, R21
NO-He, P11 (’=1/2, ’=1)
12-03-2004
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2.5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5 j’ = 5.5 j’ = 6.5
j’ = 7.5 j’ = 8.5 j’ = 9.5 j’ = 10.5 j’ = 11.5 j’ = 12.5
NO-He, P11 (’=1/2, ’=1)
0 50 100 150 2000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2.5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5
j’ = 7.5j’ = 6.5j’ = 5.5
12-03-2004
NO-He R21 (’=1/2, ’=-1)
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2.5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5 j’ = 5.5 j’ = 6.5
j’ = 7.5 j’ = 8.5 j’ = 9.5 j’ = 10.5 j’ = 11.5 j’ = 12.5
NO-He R21 (’=1/2, ’=-1)
0 50 100 150 2000
1
2
3
4
5
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
1
2
3
4
5
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
0.12
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
1
2
3
4
5
6
7x 10
-3
[o]
dcs
[ A2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
0 50 100 150 2000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4x 10
-3
[o]dc
s [ A
2 ]
TheoreticalExperimental
j’ = 11.5
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2.5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5
j’ = 8.5j’ = 7.5j’ = 6.5
j’ = 5.5
j’ = 12.5j’ = 10.5j’ = 9.5
DCS extraction
Extraction of differential cross sections (dcs’s) fromimages (forward deconvolution):
1. Calculate the center(pixel) of the scattering circle2. use intensity on an outer ring of the image as trial dcs
3. Use the trial dcs to simulate an image4. Improve the dcs, minimizing the difference between
simulated and measured image
Step 3 and 4 are repeated until the simulated an measured images correspond well enough.
NO-He R11 Q21 (’=1/2, ’=1)
15-03-2004
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2.5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5 j’ = 5.5 j’ = 6.5
j’ = 7.5 j’ = 8.5 j’ = 9.5 j’ = 10.5 j’ = 11.5 j’ = 12.5
NO-He Q11 P21 (’=1/2, ’=-1)
17-03-2004
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2..5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5 j’ = 5.5 j’ = 6.5
j’ = 7.5 j’ = 8.5 j’ = 9.5 j’ = 10.5 j’ = 11.5 j’ = 12.5
NO-He P12 (’=3/2, ’=1)
15-03-2004
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2..5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5 j’ = 5.5 j’ = 6.5
j’ = 7.5 j’ = 8.5 j’ = 9.5 j’ = 10.5 j’ = 11.5 j’ = 12.5
NO-He R22 (’=3/2, ’=-1)
15-03-2004
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2..5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5 j’ = 5.5 j’ = 6.5
j’ = 7.5 j’ = 8.5 j’ = 9.5 j’ = 10.5 j’ = 11.5 j’ = 12.5
NO-He P22 Q12 (’=3/2, ’=-1)
15-03-2004
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2..5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5 j’ = 5.5 j’ = 6.5
j’ = 7.5 j’ = 8.5 j’ = 9.5 j’ = 10.5 j’ = 11.5 j’ = 12.5
NO-He Q22 R12 (’=3/2, ’=1)
j’ = 1.5 j’ = 2..5 j’ = 3.5 j’ = 4.5 j’ = 5.5 j’ = 6.5
j’ = 7.5 j’ = 8.5 j’ = 9.5 j’ = 10.5 j’ = 11.5 j’ = 12.5
15-03-2004
A Quasi quantum mechanical treatment yield the following propensity rule depending on the parity
These parity-pairs of similar DCSs are also seen in experimental results, the ratios can be verified from HIBRIDON results.
Experiments
p’ = p = - 1
p’ = p = - 1
p’ = - p = 1
The ratios between differential cross sections within parity pairs, is close to what the Quasi- Quantmum Treatment (QQT) predics.
For large j the agreement becomes worse.
top related