NCM Graph theory talk

Secure Schemes for Secret Sharing and KeyDistribution using Graph Theory

byDr. N. Chandramowliswaran

Professor & HeadDepartment of Applied Sciences, ITM University, Gurgaon, Haryana

JAN. 05, 2014

Dr. N. Chandramowliswaran (ITM) INVITED TALK JAN. 05, 2014 1 / 49

Divisibility

We say d divides n and d ∣ n whenever n = cd for some c

(n is multiple of d, that d is a divisor of n, or that d is a factor of n)

If d does not divide n we write d ∤ n

Properties

n ∣ n (reflexive)

d ∣ n and n ∣ m then d ∣ m (transitive)

d ∣ n and d ∣ m then d ∣ an+ bm (linearity)

d ∣ n then ad ∣ an (multiplication)

ad ∣ an and a ∕= 0 then d ∣ n (cancellation)

1 ∣ n

n ∣ 0

0 ∣ n⇒ n = 0

d ∣ n and n ∕= 0⇒∣ d ∣≤∣ d ∣ (comparison)

Greatest common divisor

If d divides two integers a and b, then d is called a common divisorof a and b.

Theorem Given any two integers a and b, there is a commondivisor d of a and b of the form

d = ax+ by,

where x and y are integers. Moreover every common divisor of aand b divides this d.

Theorem Given any two integers a and b, there is one and onlyone number d with the following properties:

(a) d ≥ 0(b) d ∣ a and d ∣ b(c) e ∣ a and e ∣ b implies e ∣ d

Note. d = 0 if, and only if a = b = 0. Otherwise d ≥ 1

The number d of the above theorem is called the greatestcommon divisor (gcd) of a and b.

It is denoted by (a, b)

If (a, b) = 1 then a and b are said to be relatively prime

The gcd has the following properties

(a, b) = (b, a) (commutative)

(a, (b, c)) = ((a, b), c) (associative)

(ac, bc) =∣ c ∣ (a, b) (distributive)

(a, 1) = (1, a) = 1 and (a, 0) = (0, a) = 0

If a ∣ bc and if (a, b) = 1, then a ∣ c

Defnition . An integer n is called prime if n > 1 and if the only positivedivisors of n are 1 and n. When an integer n is not prime, we say that nis composite

If a prime p does not divide a, then (p, a) = 1,

If a prime p divides ab, then p ∣ a or p ∣ b

Fundamental theorem of arithmetic

in only one way, apart from the order of the factors.

Every integer n > 1 can be represented as a product of prime factors

The division algorithm

Given integers a and b with b > 0, there exist a unique pair of integers q

and r such that

a = bq + r, with 0 ≤ r < b.

Moreover, r = 0 if, and only if, b ∣ a

Mobius function �(n)

Definition : The mobius function � is defined as follows:

�(1) = 1

If n > 1, write n = pa11 pa22 . . . pakk . Then

�(n) = (−1)k if a1 = a2 = ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = ak = 1�(n) = 0 otherwise

Note: �(n) = 0 if and only if n has a square factor

Euler’s totient function �(n)

Let n ≥ 1 the Euler’s totient �(n) is defined to be the number ofpositive integers not exceeding n which are relatively prime to n.

�(n) =∣ {k : 1 ≤ k ≤ n, gcd(n, k) = 1} ∣

�(n) = n∏

1− 1p

, where the product is over the distinct

prime numbers dividing n

Divisor sum

Euler classical formula∑

d∣n �(d) = n,

where the sum is over all positive divisors d of n.

Properties

�(pk) = pk − pk−1 = pk−1(p− 1) = pk(

1− 1p

�(mn) = �(m)�(n) if (m,n) = 1

�(mn) = �(m)�(n)( d�(d)) if (m,n) = d

a ∣ b implies �(a) ∣ �(b)

�(n) is even for n ≥ 3. Moreover, if n has r distinct odd primefactors, then 2r ∣ �(n)

Congruences

Definition: Given integers a, b,m with m > 0. We say a iscongruent to b modulo m, and we write

a ≡ b(mod m)⇐⇒ m ∣ (a− b)

Properties

Congruence is an equivalence relation

If a ≡ b(mod m) and � ≡ �(mod m), then we have(a) ax+ �y ≡ bx+ �y(mod m) for all integers x and y

(b) a� ≡ b�(mod m)

(c) an ≡ bn(mod m) for every positive integer

(d) f(a) ≡ f(b)(mod m) for every polynomial f with integercoefficients

Theorem: If c > 0 then a ≡ b(mod m) if, and only if,ac ≡ bc(mod m)

Theorem: If ac ≡ bc(mod m) and if d = (m, c), then a ≡ b(mod md)

Theorem: If a ≡ b(mod m). If d ∣ m and d ∣ a d ∣ b

Theorem: If a ≡ b(mod m) (a,m) = (b,m)

Theorem: If a ≡ b(mod m) and if 0 ≤∣ b− a ∣< m, then a = b

Theorem: If a ≡ b(mod m) and a ≡ b(mod n) where (m,n) = 1,then a ≡ b(mod mn)

Theorem: Assume (a,m) = 1. Then the linear congruenceax ≡ b(mod m)has exactly one solution

Theorem: Assume (a,m) = d. Then the linear congruenceax ≡ b(mod m)has solutions if, and only if, d ∣ b

Theorem: Assume (a, b) = d there exists integers x and y suchthat ax+ by = d

Euler-Fermat Theorem: Assume (a,m) = 1. Then we havea�(m) ≡ 1 (mod m)

Theorem: If a prime p does not divide a thenap−1 ≡ 1 (mod m)

Little Fermat Theorem: For any integer a and any prime p wehave

ap ≡ a (mod m)

Theorem (Chinese Remainder Theorem)Suppose that m1,m2, . . . ,mr are pairwise relatively prime positiveintegers, and let a1, a2, . . . , ar be integers.

Then the system of congruences,x ≡ ai(mod mi) for 1 ≤ i ≤ r, has a unique solution moduloM = m1×m2× . . .×mr,

which is given by: x ≡ a1M1y1 + a2M2y2 + . . .+ arMryr(mod M),where Mi =

and yi ≡ (Mi)−1(mod mi) for 1 ≤ i ≤ r.

Identities on Number Theory

TheoremLet a, b be the given positive integers with (a, b) = 1 then

a�(b) + b�(a) ≡ 1 (mod ab)

a�(ab) + b�(ab) ≡ 1 (mod ab)

(a, b) = 1⇐⇒ (ab, a+ b) = 1

(ab)�(a+b) + (a+ b)�(ab) ≡ 1 (mod (a2b+ ab2)

Let p, q be two distinct primes thenpq−1 + qp−1 ≡ 1 (mod pq)

Consider the three very large odd primes p, q and r with(qr−1 + rq−1) ∕≡ 0 (mod p), (rp−1 + pr−1) ∕≡ 0 (mod q)

and (pq−1 + qp−1) ∕≡ 0 (mod r).

LemmaLet p, q and r be three given distinct odd primes.Then there exist integers k1, k2 and k3 such that

k1p(qr−1+ rq−1)+k2q(p

r−1+ rq−1)+k3r(pq−1+ qp−1)+2≡ 0 (mod pqr).

TheoremLet S be the given secret and N = pqr where p, q and r are distinctlarge odd primes.Define three secret shareholders Y1, Y2, Y3 as follows:

Y1≡(−Sk1p(qr−1 + rq−1)) (mod N),

Y2≡(−Sk2q(pr−1 + rp−1)) (mod N) and

Y3≡(−S(k3r(pq−1 + qp−1) + 1)) (modN) then

S=Y1 + Y2 + Y3(mod N)

TheoremLet a and b be the two positive integers with

(a, b) = 1⇐⇒ (a, a+ b) = 1

a�(a+b) + (a+ b)�(a) ≡ 1 (mod a2 + ab)

(a, b) = 1⇐⇒ (b, a+ b) = 1

b�(a+b) + (a+ b)�(b) ≡ 1 (mod b2 + ab)

TheoremLet a, b and c be any three positive integers with

(a, b)=(a, c)=(b, c)=1

Then a�(bc) + b�(ac) + c�(ab) ≡ 2 (mod abc)

Let x and y be any two positive integers with

x≡y (mod a),x≡y (mod b) andx≡y (mod c)

Then x≡y (mod abc)

TheoremLet m1,m2, . . . ,mr (r ≥ 2) be any distinct r mutually co-primepositive integers. Define M = m1m2 . . .mr

Then∑

�( Mmi

i ≡ r − 1 (mod M)

Managing the shortage of Login ID Problems in Petersen Networks

user 13

user10 user 9

user 8user 6

user 2

user 4

3user11

user 15

12user

ID3 ID4

ID2 ID5

There are 10 Login ID and 15 fifteen users in the given network

Any two Login IDs can be utilized by at most one user

Every Login ID is used by exactly three users

Represent the Login IDs by the nodes (vertices) of the graph G

If there is a user − j using Login IDs Log IDr and Log IDs, thenjoin them by an edge

Log IDr Log IDs

user j

If the two users have a common Login ID then they are conflictusers, otherwise non-conflict users.

For example, Conflict users: user − 1, user − 2 and user − 7, theyhave common Login ID Log ID1 and Non-Conflict users:user − 2, user − 5 and user − 9

Define V (G) = {vi = Log IDi ∣ 1 ≤ i ≤ 10}

Define E(G) = {k = user k ∣ 1 ≤ k ≤ 15}

Define f(vi) = f(Log IDi) = �(i), where � is a permutation on theset of numbers {1, 2, . . . , 10}.

This �(i) is given for each Log IDi

Now define the graceful labeling g on the set{�(1), �(2), . . . , �(10)}g : {�(i) : 1 ≤ i ≤ 10} −→ {0, 1, 2, . . . , q − 1, q}. Suppose

Log IDr Log IDs

user j

g[user j] =∣ g(�(r))− g(�(s)) ∣∈ {1, 2, . . . , q}where 1 ≤ r, s ≤ 10, r ∕= s

g : E(G)−→{1, 2, . . . , q}

g is kept secret, but g[user j] is given for each user j

g[user j] is called user − ID

Log IDr Log IDs

user j

(�(r), �(s)) are two Login IDs for the user j

Entire Network is kept secret

P : V (G)−→{p1, p2, . . . , p10}

where pi, 1 ≤ i ≤ 10 are distinct odd primes with

q < min{pi}, 1 ≤ i ≤ 10, q < pj∀j (P is kept secret)

Log IDr Log IDs

user j

�(r) �(s)known

g[user j] is known 1 ≤ j ≤ 15

Define ej : (ej , (pr − 1)(ps − 1)) = 1 (ej kept secret)

Define mj ≡ (g[user j])ej (mod prps)P[Log IDr] = pr,P[Log IDs] = ps, 1 ≤ r, s ≤ 10, r ∕= s

Decompose the user (edges) into subset of Non-Conflict users(set of Independent Edges)

A = {user − 2, user − 5, user − 9, user − 11, user − 13}:

user − 2←→ {Log ID1, Log ID5}

B = {user − 1, user − 3, user − 12, user − 14}:

C = {user − 4, user − 7, user − 8, user − 15}:

D = {user − 6, user − 10}:

Define congruences equations for the set A,B,C and D as follows

x ≡ m2 (mod p1p5)x ≡ m5 (mod p2p3)x ≡ m9 (mod p4p8)x ≡ m11 (mod p6p9)x ≡ m13 (mod p7p10)

x has a unique solution (mod p1p2 . . . p10)

Thus x is the common secret shared by the group A Non-Conflictusers

y ≡ m1 (mod p1p2)y ≡ m3 (mod p4p5)y ≡ m12 (mod p6p8)y ≡ m14 (mod p7p9)

y has a unique solution (mod p1p2p4p5p6p7p8p9)

Thus y is the common secret shared by the group B Non-Conflictusers

z ≡ m4 (mod p3p4)z ≡ m7 (mod p1p6)z ≡ m8 (mod p5p7)z ≡ m15 (mod p8p10)

z has a unique solution (mod p1p3p4p5p6p7p8p10)

Thus z is the common secret shared by the group C Non-Conflictusers

w ≡ m6 (mod p2p10)w ≡ m10 (mod p3p9)

w has a unique solution (mod p2p3p9p10)

Thus w is the common secret shared by the group D Non-Conflictusers

REFERENCE

Adi Shamir, (1979), How to share a secret, Communications of theACM 22 (11) 612-613.

Asmuth, C., Bloom, J.: A modular approach to key safeguarding.IEEE Trans. inform. Theory, 29 (1983) 208U210.

R. Balakrishnan and K. Ranganathan, A textbook of GraphTheory, Second Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2012.

S. Barnard, J.M. Child, Higher Algebra, The Macmillan and Co.,1952.

Beimel. A, Secret-sharing schemes: a survey, Proceedings of theThird international conference on Coding and cryptology, Berlin,Heidelberg, 2011, Springer-Verlag, IWCC’11, pages 11-46.

REFERENCE

E.R.Berlekamp, Algebraic Coding Theory, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1968.

Blakley, G. R. (1979), Safeguarding cryptographic keys,Proceedings of the National Computer Conference 48, 313-317.

Mignotte, M.: How to share a secret. Advances in Cryptology UEurocryptŠ82, LNCS, Springer-Verlag, 149 (1983) 371-375.

Muralikrishna. P, Srinivasan. S and Chandramowliswaran. N,Secure Schemes for Secret Sharing and Key Distribution usingPell’s equation, International Journal of Pure and AppliedMathematics, 85 No 5 (2013) 933-937.

E. Okamoto and K. Tanaka, Key distribution system based onidentification information, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas inCommunications, 7 No 4 (1989) 481-485.

REFERENCE

Srinivasan. S, Muralikrishna. P and Chandramowliswaran. N,Authenticated Multiple Key Distribution using Simple ContinuedFraction, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics,87 No 2 (2013) 349-354.

Ivan Niven, Herbert S. Zuckerman and Hugh L. Montgomery, AnIntroduction to the Theory of Numbers, John Wiley.

Tom M. Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, Springer.

N.Koblitz, A Course in Number Theory and Cryptography, 2ndEds., Springer-Verlag, 1994, B.Schneier, Applied Cryptography,2nd ed., J.Wiley& Sons, Inc., 1996.

Yang Lu and Jiguo Li, Int. J. Innov. Comput., Inf. Control, 9, No 11(2013) 4509-4518.

NCM Graph theory talk

Documents

Air Cylinder Series NCM - SMC株式会社 matter 1 Series...

Anitimicrobial activity of ethanolic extract of the whole...

Graph Regularised Hashing (ECIR'15 Talk)

Talk on Graph Theory - I

Combinatorics and Graph Theory with Mathematica...

CMU SCS Talk 3: Graph Mining Tools – Tensors, communities,...

3-jaw parallel self-centering pneumatic gripper …Mx d 3...

códigos ncm

Listado de NCM - produccion.gob.ar · Listado de NCM...

Talk Graph Algorithms

Parallel Graph Algorithms · 2004. 9. 20. · 2 Actually,.....

ncm descrição ncm destaque descrição destaque anuente(s)

Talk 2: Graph Mining Tools - SVD, ranking, proximity...

Ncm - Report

Spotify Web API (Music Graph Tech Talk 2013 08-14)

First Things FirstFirst Things First - Clover...