Mrozin,md BENIGN VS MALIGNANT MASSES IN BREAST ULTRASOUND Dr. Mona Rozin Director of Breast Imaging Assuta Medical Centers.

Post on 26-Mar-2015

401 Views

Category:

Documents

11 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

mrozin,md

BENIGN VS MALIGNANT MASSES IN BREAST

ULTRASOUND

Dr. Mona RozinDirector of Breast Imaging

Assuta Medical Centers

mrozin,md

Goal of Breast Ultrasound

SOLID VS CYSTIC

mrozin,md

Goal of Breast Ultrasound

• Make a more specific diagnosis than clinical and mammographic findingsalone.

• Prevent unnecessary biopsies.• Find cancers missed by mammography.

mrozin,md

Breast cancer is extremely heterogeneous therefore we CANNOT distinguish benign from malignant on the basis of only a single sonographic finding.

Breast cancer varies greatly not only from one mass to another but even WITHIN an individual mass.

mrozin,md

Ultrasound shows morphology and not histology / biology

ONE suspicious finding requires further evaluation -----> that is biopsy and should be given BIRAD 4A up to 5

mrozin,md

BIRADS for U/S

BIRAD 1 – normal

BIRAD 2 – benign finding

BIRAD 3 – probably benign

mrozin,md

BIRADS for U/S

BIRAD 4A – abnormal finding – low suspicion

BIRAD 4B – abnormal finding – intermediate suspicion

BIRAD 4C – abnormal finding – probably malignant

BIRAD 5 – highly suspicious for malignancy

BIRAD 6 – known malignancy

mrozin,md

Spectrum of masses

mrozin,md

Circumscribed vs Spiculated malignant masses – a

spectrum of ultrasound features

I. Desmoplastic vs. inflammatory reaction

II. Cellularity

III. Vascularity

mrozin,md

Desmoplastic Reaction• Host response to tumor – attempt to

wall off the tumor with fibrosis and elastosis to keep it from spreading.

• Develops slowly• Therefore spiculated lesions are

usually slow growing GRADE 1 – 2 tumors

mrozin,md

Inflammatory Response• GRADE 3 tumors may be

circumscribed and grow so fast that desmoplasia has no time to develop.

• These carcinomas incite an inflammatory response with lymphocytes and plasma cells.

mrozin,md

Cellularity

• Circumscribed masses are much more cellular than spiculated masses.

• They have lots of tumor cells, lymph cells and plasma cells – this causes posterior enhancement.

• Spiculated masses have much fewer cells and very hypocellular desmoplasia – this causes posterior shadowing.

mrozin,md

Vascularity

• Circumscribed masses are usually very vascular – lots of cells and divisions require more blood – more angiogenetic factors; inflammatory response also creates hypervascularity.

• Spiculated masses may have same vascularity as normal tissue or benign masses because of the smaller amount of cells and angiogenetic factors.

mrozin,md

mrozin,md

BIRADS for Ultrasound Masses

I. ShapeII. MarginIII. OrientationIV. Lesion boundaryV. Echogenic patternVI. Posterior acoustic featuresVII. Effect on surrounding

parenchymaVIII.Calcifications IX. Vascularity

mrozin,md

Background Breast Pattern

• Homogenous Fatty• Heterogeneous – focally or

diffusely variable• Homogenous Fibroglandular

mrozin,md

Fatty

mrozin,md

Heterogeneous

mrozin,md

Fibroglandular

mrozin,md

I. Shape

• Oval – includes tear drop shape 2-3 macrolobulations may be with thin echogenic capsule

• Round – cysts, mets, IDC (high grade)

• Irregular – NOT round or oval

mrozin,md

Oval

fibroadenoma

DCIS

mrozin,md

Round

cyst

DCIS

mrozin,md

Irregular

IDC

IDC

radial scar

mrozin,md

II. Margin

• Circumscribed – smooth, distinct margin

• Microlobulated – may be the expression of extended lobules filled with DCIS; 80% of all IDC have a component of DCIS

• Indistinct – NO abrupt interface with surrounding tissue

mrozin,md

Circumscribed

mrozin,md

II. Margin

• Circumscribed – smooth, distinct margin

• Microlobulated – may be the expression of extended lobules filled with DCIS; 80% of all IDC have a component of DCIS

• Indistinct – NO abrupt interface with surrounding tissue

mrozin,md

Microlobulated

mrozin,md

mrozin,md

II. Margin

• Circumscribed – smooth, distinct margin

• Microlobulated – may be the expression of extended lobules filled with DCIS; 80% of all IDC have a component of DCIS

• Indistinct – NO abrupt interface with surrounding tissue

mrozin,md

Indistinct

mrozin,md

Margin – cont.• Angular – part of margin has sharp corners;

most accurate of all signs of malignancy;invasion follows path of least resistance – in fat: many angles; in fibrosis: horizontal and then along Cooper’s ligaments

• Spiculated – sharp projecting lines; use U/S MAG views to see surface characteristics This is a spectrum of findings

mrozin,md

Angular

mrozin,md

mrozin,md

Margin – cont.• Angular – part of margin has sharp corners;

most accurate of all signs of malignancy;invasion follows path of least resistance – in fat: many angles; in fibrosis: horizontal and then along Cooper’s ligaments

• Spiculated – sharp projecting lines; use U/S MAG views to see surface characteristics This is a spectrum of findings

mrozin,md

Spiculated

mrozin,md

Mixed

mrozin,md

III. Orientation

• Parallel – wider than tall – long axis parallel to skin

• NOT parallel – taller than wide – long axis perpendicular to skin

includes ROUND masses

mrozin,md

TDLU

mrozin,md

CA

FA

mrozin,md

mrozin,md

mrozin,md

ant.post. terminal

mrozin,md

mrozin,md

Wider than tall !!

ant. lobule

terminal lobulesdistended duct

with invasion

mrozin,md

IV. Lesion Boundary• Abrupt interface – no transition zone

between mass and surrounding tissue

• Echogenic rim – variant of spicules too

small to resolve on U/S; some masses have a very thick echogenic rim with a tiny hypoechogenic nidus – must examine carefully;

peritumoral edema usually occurs btw. mass and skin

mrozin,md

Abrupt Interface

echogenic capsule

FA CA

mrozin,md

IV. Lesion Boundary• Abrupt interface – no transition zone

between mass and surrounding tissue

• Echogenic rim – variant of spicules too

small to resolve on U/S; some masses have a very thick echogenic rim with a tiny hypoechogenic nidus – must examine carefully;

peritumoral edema usually occurs btw. mass and skin

mrozin,md

Echogenic Rim

mrozin,md

Echogenic Rim

Same mass – with & without Sono-CT

mrozin,md

V. Echogenic Pattern

• Hyperechoic – more than fat; very rarely can be angiosarcoma, ILC, lymphoma

• Isoechoic – equal to fat• Hypoechoic – less than fat• Mixed – hyper and hypo; can be

fibrosis, fat necrosis, FA, IDC• Anechoic – absence of internal echoes;

mets, IDC- high grade.

mrozin,md

normal fibrotic tisssue

siliconefat necrosis

mrozin,md

hyper with iso 4 mo later

hyper?

NOT

mrozin,md

V. Echogenic Pattern

• Hyperechoic – more than fat; very rarely can be angiosarcoma, ILC, lymphoma

• Isoechoic – equal to fat• Hypoechoic – less than fat• Mixed – hyper and hypo; can be

fibrosis, fat necrosis, FA, IDC• Anechoic – absence of internal echoes;

mets, IDC- high grade.

mrozin,md

mrozin,md

Mucinous CA

mrozin,md

V. Echogenic Pattern

• Hyperechoic – more than fat; very rarely can be angiosarcoma, ILC, lymphoma

• Isoechoic – equal to fat• Hypoechoic – less than fat• Mixed – hyper and hypo; can be

fibrosis, fat necrosis, FA, IDC• Anechoic – absence of internal echoes;

mets, IDC- high grade.

mrozin,md

IDC

seroma

FA

mrozin,md

V. Echogenic Pattern

• Hyperechoic – more than fat; very rarely can be angiosarcoma, ILC, lymphoma

• Isoechoic – equal to fat• Hypoechoic – less than fat• Mixed – hyper and hypo; can be

fibrosis, fat necrosis, FA, IDC• Anechoic – absence of internal echoes;

mets, IDC- high grade.

mrozin,md

hematoma

phylloides

Intracystic papillary CA

mrozin,md

V. Echogenic Pattern

• Hyperechoic – more than fat; very rarely can be angiosarcoma, ILC, lymphoma

• Isoechoic – equal to fat• Hypoechoic – less than fat• Mixed – hyper and hypo; can be

fibrosis, fat necrosis, FA, IDC• Anechoic – absence of internal echoes;

cysts mets, IDC- high grade.

mrozin,md

cysts

mrozin,md

VI. Posterior Acoustic Features

• None• Enhancement – highly cellular lesions• Shadowing – seen in desmoplasia• Combined Can use this finding to try and predict

GRADE; very small lesions (< 5 mm) may have no transmission because haven’t had time to develop desmoplasia or inflammatory reaction

mrozin,md

Shadowing

mrozin,md

enhancement

normal

CA

cyst

mrozin,md

DO NOT FORGET - May see artifactual shadowing from

steep Cooper’s ligaments – can be removed with compression !

mrozin,md

artifact

compression

mrozin,md

DD of Enhancement

1) IDC – high GRADE2) Mucinous CA3) Medullary CA4) Metaplastic CA5) Papillary CA

6) FA7) Cysts

mrozin,md

DD of Shadowing

1) IDC – low GRADE2) ILC3) Tubular CA

4) Scar5) Fat necrosis6) Radial scar7) Calcified FA8) Calcified oil cysts

mrozin,md

VII. Effect on Surrounding Tissue

• Straightening of Cooper’s ligaments

• Architectural distortion• Skin thickening – normal 2 mm• Skin retraction• Edema – mastitis, radiation Tx,

inflammatory CA, CHF• Ducts – abnormal size, branching

mrozin,md

Architectural distortion

Thickening & straightening of cooper’s ligaments

mrozin,md

VII. Effect on Surrounding Tissue

• Straightening of Cooper’s ligaments

• Architectural distortion• Skin thickening – normal 2 mm• Skin retraction• Edema – mastitis, radiation Tx,

inflammatory CA, CHF• Ducts – abnormal size, branching

mrozin,md

Inflammatory CA

Skin thickening

mrozin,md

Skin retraction in scar with seroma

mrozin,md

VII. Effect on Surrounding Tissue

• Straightening of Cooper’s ligaments

• Architectural distortion• Skin thickening – normal 2 mm• Skin retraction• Edema – mastitis, radiation Tx,

inflammatory CA, CHF• Ducts – abnormal size, branching

mrozin,md

focal edema

Edema with dilated lymphatics

mrozin,md

VII. Effect on Surrounding Tissue

• Straightening of Cooper’s ligaments

• Architectural distortion• Skin thickening – normal 2 mm• Skin retraction• Edema – mastitis, radiation Tx,

inflammatory CA, CHF• Ducts – abnormal size, branching

mrozin,md

mrozin,md

Duct extension

Branch pattern

mrozin,md

IDC

1st lumpectomy with + margin

2nd lumpectomy with + margin

Duct extension

mrozin,md

VIII. Calcifications

• Macrocalcifications • Microcalcifications outside a

mass• Microcalcifications inside a mass

mrozin,md

FAOil cyst

mrozin,md

IDC

DCIS

mrozin,md

IX. Vascularity

• Absent • Present• Adjacent to lesion• In surrounding tissue

mrozin,md

IDC-Grade I

Feeding vessel

mrozin,md

IDC-GradeII

mrozin,md

FA

mrozin,md

FA Cyst

mrozin,md

mrozin,md

mrozin,md

Suspicious for Malignancy

I. Hard spiculations, thick rim angular margins (shadowing)

II. Intermediate hypoechoic microlobulation taller than wide

Stavaros

mrozin,md

III. Soft duct extension branching pattern calcifications

Stavaros

mrozin,md

Most likely benign

• Oval• Circumscribed – echogenic

capsule• Parallel• Abrupt interface• Hyperechogenic

mrozin,md

Algorithm for Sonographic Evaluation

1) Look for malignant findings and if there are any – give BIRADS 4-5 and biopsy

2) If there are NO malignant findings look for benign findings and if there are any give BIRADS 2-3 and suggest follow-up

3) If NO benign findings found – give BIRADS 4A and biopsy

mrozin,md

Sine Qua Non (without which there is nothing) technique, technique, technique

Must always base management on the worst feature present !!!!

mrozin,md

top related