motivation (predicted medium effects in the charm sector)
Post on 07-Jan-2016
22 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Transcript
• motivation (predicted medium effects in the charm sector)
Hadron modifications seen with electromagnetic probes
Hadron modifications seen with electromagnetic probes
Volker MetagII. Physikalisches Institut
Universität GiessenGermany
Observables in pp interactions and their relevance to QCDWorkshop at ECT*,Trento, Italy, July 3-7, 2006
• first observation of medium modifications of the meson: a.) mass shift b.) in-medium width in-medium spectral function s(,p)
B11ω
• first observation of an -nucleus bound state:
• summary and outlook
MotivationMotivation
widespread experimental activities to search for in-medium modifications of hadrons
Mas
s [G
eV]
• hadrons = excitations of the QCD vacuum
T.Hatsuda and S. Lee,PRC 46 (1992) R34
G.E.Brown and M. Rho,PRL 66 (1991) 2720
0
**
8.0qq
mm
18.0;1mm
0
B
V
*V
• QCD-vacuum: complicated structure characterized by condensates
• in the nuclear medium: condensates are changed
change of the hadronic excitation energy spectrum
• in-medium mass shift (partial restoration of chiral symmetry, meson-baryon coupling)
possible in-medium modifications of hadronspossible in-medium modifications of hadrons
• in-medium broadening of hadron resonances (meson-baryon coupling, collisional broadening)
• hadron-nucleus bound states (meson-nucleus attractive potential)
model predictions for in-medium masses of mesonsmodel predictions for in-medium masses of mesons
K. Saito, K. Tushima, and A.W. ThomasPRC 55 (1997) 2637
Quark-meson coupling model (QMC)
decrease of -mass by 15%;decrease of D-mass by 3%at normal nuclear matter density
V. Bernard and U.-G. MeißnerNPA 489 (1988) 647
NJL-model
degeneracy of chiral partners
predictions in the charm sectorpredictions in the charm sector
consequences of a dropping D-meson mass
A. Hayashigaki, Phys. Lett. B 487 (2000) 96
QCD sum rules: mD - 50 MeV width of (3770) increases
2.7)MeV(23.6Γvac(3770)
on the other hand, Lee and Ko find:(S.H.Lee and C.M.Ko PRC67 (2003) 038202)
MeV38ΔmJ/ψ
MeV15140Δmψ(3770)
MeV30100Δmψ(2s)
from D-meson loops
(2s) may become instable to DD-decay
1.) lowering of in-medium mass 2.) broadening of resonance
for B
Model predictions for spectral functions of and mesonsModel predictions for spectral functions of and mesons
F. Klingl et al. NPA 610 (1997) 297 NPA 650 (1999) 299
- meson
00.25
0.5
0.75
10
0.2
0.40.6
0.811.20
0.5
1
1.5
2
00.25
0.5
0.75
1
m [GeV]q [GeV]
AT [GeV-2]
M. Post et al., nucl-th/0309085
-meson
-, -meson-nucleus potential-, -meson-nucleus potential
K. Saito, K. Tsushima, A.W. Thomas, hep-ph/0506314
: E(1s) = -39 MeV; = 29 MeV: E(1s) = -100 MeV; = 31 MeV
: E(1s) = -56 MeV; = 33 MeV: E(1s) = -118 MeV; = 33 MeV
predictions within the quark meson coupling model (QMC)
Predictions of nuclear bound quarkonium statesPredictions of nuclear bound quarkonium states
• S. Brodsky et al. , PRL 64 (1990) 1011
attractive cc – nucleon potential due to multi gluon exchange c binding energy to light nuclei of the order of 20 MeV
• Klingl et al., PRL 82 (1999) 3396
QCD sum rules: attractive mass shift of 5-10 MeV for J/ and c
• K. Saito et al., hep-ph/0506314
D- - nucleus bound states (superposition of Coulomb + strong interaction)
D- 208Pb (1s) bound by 24 MeV
• CLAS (Jlab): C. Tur et al., A , , +X
• HADES (GSI): planned experiment - p n on bound proton
essential advantage: no final state interactions !!
221 ppm
reconstruction of invariant mass from 4-momenta of decay products:
experimental approach: dilepton spectroscopy: , , e+e-experimental approach: dilepton spectroscopy: , , e+e-
• KEK-E325: M. Naruki et al., PRL 96 (2006) 092301:
;092.01mm0
0
no broadening in the medium!!-meson:
p (12 GeV) A , +X
• NA60: R. Arnaldi et al., PRL 96 (2006) 162302: In + In (158 AGeV)
-spectral function shows strong broadening but no shift in mass
-mass in nuclei from photonuclear reactions-mass in nuclei from photonuclear reactions
disadvantage:
• 0-rescattering
advantage:
• 0 large branching ratio (8 %)
• no -contribution ( 0 : 7 10-4)
J.G.Messchendorp et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 11 (2001) 95
p
A + X
0
2ppm
fraction of -decays in the medium( 0.1 0) : 35%
M. Effenberger et al.
rescattering of pions in nucleipredominantly proceeds through (1232) excitation:scattered pions have Ekin150 MeV
Expected in-medium signalExpected in-medium signal
no distortion by pion rescattering expected in mass range of interest
detector system CB/TAPS @ ELSAdetector system CB/TAPS @ ELSA
front view of TAPS
= 00 to 3600
= 50 to 300
side view
Crystal Barrel 1290 CsI
= 00 to 3600 = 300 to 1680
E=900-2200 MeV
TAPS 528 BaF2
comparison of meson masses and lineshapesfor LH2 and nuclear targets
comparison of meson masses and lineshapesfor LH2 and nuclear targets
No change of mass and lineshape for longlived mesons (0, , ) decaying outside nuclei
0
inclusive 0 signal for LH2 and Nb targetinclusive 0 signal for LH2 and Nb target
difference in line shape of signal for proton and nuclear target
D. Trnka et al., PRL 94 (2005)192303
after background subtraction
m = m0 (1 - /0) for = 0.13mNb = 763 MeV; 0.110 consistent
with
decomposition of signal into in-medium and vacuum decay contributions
decomposition of signal into in-medium and vacuum decay contributions
lineshape of vacuum contribution taken from LH2 experiment
shape of in-medium contribution taken from BUU simulation (P. Mühlich and U. Mosel, NPA (2006)), assuming m = m0(1 - 0.16 /0)
Nb: in-medium: 45% C: in-medium: 40%
c/MeV400p c/MeV400p
vacuum contributionin-medium contribution
D. Trnka, PhD thesis,Univ. Giessen 2006
access to in-medium widthaccess to in-medium width
in-medium width proportional to absorption: vabs
normalization to C!!E= 1,5 GeV
P. Mühlich and U. MoselNPA (2006)
74 MeV
37 MeV
= 19 MeV
M. Kaskulov and E. Osetpriv. communication
= 34 MeV
94 MeV
transparency ratio:XN
XAA A
T
access to in-medium widthaccess to in-medium width
in-medium width proportional to absorption: vabs
transparency ratio:XN
XAA A
T
normalization to C!!
E=1.5 GeV
37 MeV
74 MeV
= 19 MeV
= 34 MeV
94 MeV
Comparison to data taken at E = 1.45-1.55 GeV (D.Trnka et al.(preliminary))
dependence of width on momentumdependence of width on momentum
P. Mühlich , private communication
MeV 40 0)p,Γ(ρ ω0
750MeV/cpω
MeV100MeV/c)750p,Γ(ρ ω0
taking the momentum dependenceof the width into account,both analyses agree:
MeV100MeV/c)750p,Γ(ρ ω0
• gets broadened in the medium by a factor 10!!
• transparency ratio measurement also possible for charmed mesons in the nuclear medium inel (p) (p); (J/-suppression in AA collisions)
• experimental problem: luminosity L A-2/3 (for Au factor 30 !!)
p - loss due to single Coulomb scattering Z2
momentum dependence of signal (Nb-target)momentum dependence of signal (Nb-target)
mass modification only for p 0.5 GeV/c
determination of momentum dependence of - nucleus potential requires finer momentum bins improved 2nd. generation experiment
Nb
LH2
D. Trnka et al., PRL 94 (2005)192303
The population of meson-nucleus bound states in recoil-free kinematics
The population of meson-nucleus bound states in recoil-free kinematics
forward going nucleon takes over photon momentum
magic incident energies : E 930 MeV : E 2750 MeV
(ELSA)
quasifree
-mesic states
T. Nagahiro et al. N. Phys. A 761 (2005) 92
quasifree
E. Marco and W. Weise, PLB 502 (2001) 59
attractive potential
signature for - mesic states
repulsivepotential
no intensity for negative energies
5°
15°
740 MeV/c
240 MeV/c
p
E = 2750 MeV
correlation between momentum and proton angle
simulation
E = 1.5 –2.5 GeV
background
bound states expected for p < 140
|p| < 500 MeV/c for p < 140
candidates
comparison of data on LH2 and Ccomparison of data on LH2 and C
large proton angles180 < p< 280
• for large proton angles: similar background distributions for C and LH2 data
C
LH2
small proton angles70 < p< 140
LH2
• for small proton angles: difference between C and LH2 data for negative energies
Cquasi-free
D. Trnka, PhD thesis,Univ. Giessen 2006
carbon data after background subtraction
70 < p< 140
quasifree
Evidence for Evidence for B11ω
first evidence for the existenceof an -nucleus bound state:
here: B11ω
sr
nb550
d
d
theo
E.Marco and W.WeisePLB 502 (2001) 59
theoretical prediction mesic states
sr
b4.1
d
d
exp
population of charmed meson bound states??population of charmed meson bound states??
No chance for populating a state bound with 20 MeV!!!
labinEtotηc
labinpcη
p 4He c3H (S. Brodsky et al., PRL 64 (1990) 1011)
c bound by 20 MeV; exp. signature -decay (branching 4•10-4)
in the laboratory: minimum c momentum: 2.1 GeV/c;
c = 0.59; Ekin(c) = 400 MeV
minimum incident p-kinetic energy: 1.54 GeV
in the laboratory: minimum J/(1s) momentum: 4.4 GeV/c; J/ = 0.82; Ekin(J/) = 2.28 GeV
no chance of forming a J/- nucleus bound state!!
labinEtotJ/ψ labinpJ/ψ
kinematics for pp (2s) J/(1s) + 2 at threshold: Ekin(p) = 5.37 GeV
(allowing for phase space of 3 GeV)
Summary and outlookSummary and outlook
major step forward towards understanding the origin of hadron masses
• first information on in-medium width: 0ω ρρatMeV100Γ
• first evidence for mesic 11B
• An in-medium dropping of the meson mass has been observed
consistent with
00 14.01mm
difficult to transfer techniques and approaches to the charm sector !!
second generation experiments with improved statistics are needed and in preparation
CBELSA/TAPS collaborationCBELSA/TAPS collaboration
EEB
0
Decay of a bound -mesic state: 3HeDecay of a bound -mesic state: 3He
excitation function: rise in cross section near threshold:-mesic 3He state ? (N-final state interaction?)
3He
E [MeV]structure in excitation function for 0 p back-to-back emission
0p+X
3He
S11
3He*
p
2H
He3
p – decay of He3
p S11
3He 3He* 2H
He3
E [MeV]E [MeV] E
[MeV]structure in excitation function of 0p back-to-back emission near -threshold: B(3He)= ( 5.5 5) MeV; = (39 21) MeV
2fi
i
ffi T̂
s
16
2p
20p
0
0
0
0p0p022
0
,00
,pimmm
AmT̂
Flatte fit to TAPS dataFlatte fit to TAPS data
finer energy binning
2 poles: m-i/2 = (1487.7-i4.8) MeV; (1483.9-i8.9) MeV
M. Pfeiffer et al., PRL 94 (2005)
Prediction of mesic states in QMC and QHD modelsPrediction of mesic states in QMC and QHD modelsK. Saito, K. Tsushima, A.W. Thomas, hep-ph/0506314
Search for mesic states in heavier nucleiSearch for mesic states in heavier nuclei
C. Garcia-Recio et al., PLB 550 (2002) 47unitarized chiral model
preferably only 1s-state24Mg: B=12.6 MeV; =33 MeV
experiment at COSY (ENSTAR/Big-Karl): Roy et al. : p 12C 3He + 10B; p 6Li 3He + 4Heexperiment at GSI: Hayano et al., EPJ A6 (1999) 105; 7Li(d,3He)6He; Td = 3.6GeV
Prediction of mesic statesPrediction of mesic states
E. Marco and W. Weise, PLB 502 (2001) 59
A. Hayashigaki, PLB487 (2000) 96
Ye.S.Golubeva et al.,nucl-th/0212074
(3770)
top related