Michigan School Improvement Framework
Post on 14-Jan-2016
34 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Transcript
Michigan School
ImprovementFramework
Michigan School
ImprovementFramework
Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to walk from here? That depends a good deal on where you want to get to, said the cat. I don't much care where, said Alice.
Then it doesn't matter which way you walk, said the Cat. -so long as I get somewhere, Alice added. Oh, you're sure to do that, said the Cat, if you only walk long enough.-- Lewis Carroll...Alice in Wonderland
State Board Vision StatementState Board Vision Statement
The State Board of Education and Department of Education, with their partners, are the driving forces to create learning environments that prepare all students to be successful in the 21st Century knowledge economy.
The Challenge…The Challenge…
• Provide a comprehensive framework based on current research and best practice to serve as a road map to support continuous school improvement.
The Challenge…The Challenge…
• Develop a framework
that is based on research
yet can be individualized
to support the unique
needs of each school.
The Challenge…The Challenge…
Provide the educational
community with a
common school
improvement dialogue
and vocabulary.
The Challenge…The Challenge…
Serve as a conceptual
foundation to guide our
thinking and action
regarding school
improvement.
Our Goal… Our Goal…
• Develop a set of standards through which our work is filtered and/or designed– Professional Development
– Technical Support and Program Development
– Grant Criteria
– Accreditation – Performance Indicators
Criteria for SI FrameworkCriteria for SI Framework
• Build on current Indicators (Internal Validity)
• Easy to Understand & User Friendly
• Focused on Student Achievement
• Measurable – OEAA development
• Self-sufficient/Stand Alone
Criteria for SI FrameworkCriteria for SI Framework
•Aligned - NCLB, Research, State/Federal Programs, PA 25, existing Performance Indicators
•Address triple purpose: feedback and guidance, guideposts for work, and accountability
Overview of Workgroup Process
Overview of Workgroup Process
• Convened 60 educators (July ‘04)• Reviewed “Kent Report” for
recommendations• Reviewed current Performance
Indicators• Reviewed the literature on school
improvement• Cross-referenced research – search for
common elements
Overview of Workgroup Process
Overview of Workgroup Process
• Developed a “school improvement framework” – strands, standards, benchmarks, criteria, evidence
• OSI develops framework; OEAA develops measurements
• Cross reference Framework w/ Continuous Improvement Monitoring System (CIMS)
• State Board Final Approval (Dec ’05)
The FrameworkThe Framework
SI Framework StructureSI Framework Structure
Strand – General Area of Focus
Standard - Category of Influence within the Strand
Benchmark - Specific Area of Performance within a Standard
Clarifying Criteria – Examples of the Benchmark statements
Evidence - Hard and/or soft data that provides evidence of Benchmark performance.
The SI FrameworkThe SI Framework
5 Strands
12 Standards
26 Benchmarks
Clarifying Examples
Prioritize
Prioritize
Strand I - TEACHING for LEARNING
Strand II – LEADERSHIP
Strand III - PERSONNEL & PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
Strand V - DATA & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
Strand IV – SCHOOL & COMMUNITY RELATIONS
The 5 StrandsThe 5 Strands
Strand II - LEADERSHIP
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP
OPERATIONAL RESOURCE MNGT.
SHARED LEADERSHIP
CURRICULUM
INSTRUCTION
ASSESSMENT
Strand I – TEACHING for LEARNING
Strand III - PERSONNEL & PROF. LEARNING
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING
Strand IV - SCHOOL/ COMMUNITY RELATIONS
PARENT/FAMILY INVOLVEMENT
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Strand V - DATA & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
DATA MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
The 12 StandardsThe 12 Standards
The BenchmarksThe Benchmarks
Strand 1 – TEACHING for LEARNING
• Curriculum – Written & Aligned
• Curriculum – Communicated
• Instructional Planning
• Instructional Delivery• Assessment Aligned
to Curriculum and Instruction
• Reporting and Use of Data
Strand I – LEADERSHIP
• Educational Program• Instructional Support• Resource Allocation• Operational
Management• School Climate and
Culture• Continuous
Improvement
The BenchmarksThe Benchmarks
Strand III - PERSONNEL & PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
• Requirements• Skills,
Knowledge, Dispositions
• Collaboration• Content &
Pedagogy• Alignment
Strand IV - SCHOOL/
COMMUNITY RELATIONS
•Communication with Families/ Community
•Authentic Engagement with Families/ Community
Strand V –
Data and KNOWLEDGE MANAGEME
NT
• Identification & Collection
• Analysis• Accessibility• Reporting• Interpretatio
n & Application
Essential QuestionsEssential Questions
•How will the School Improve-How will the School Improve-ment Framework be used?ment Framework be used?
•Will the framework items be Will the framework items be mandatory? mandatory?
• Is this designed to be answered Is this designed to be answered by districts or by schools?by districts or by schools?
• In what ways will the framework In what ways will the framework provide a guide for shaping new provide a guide for shaping new accreditation and accountability accreditation and accountability systems such as Education YES?systems such as Education YES?
• Does this framework consolidate/ Does this framework consolidate/ coordinate with Continuous coordinate with Continuous Improvement Monitoring System Improvement Monitoring System (CIMS)?(CIMS)?
Essential QuestionsEssential Questions
Essential QuestionsEssential Questions
•What happens to MI-Plan when What happens to MI-Plan when we switch over to this we switch over to this framework?framework?
•What's the timeline for What's the timeline for implementation?implementation?
Progress ReportProgress Report•Development of tools to
support Framework – where are we?– Glossary– School Improvement Template– Self Assessment Tool – Local
training– Building Level Professional
Development – Parent/Community Guide– Evidence examples
Progress ReportProgress Report
•Alignment of Framework and Education YES!– Rubric– Surveys– Existing Data bases – School Improvement Plan– Evaluation of Plan - strategies
Progress ReportProgress Report
•Rubric Development - Rubric Development -
– February 2006 – Draft CompletedFebruary 2006 – Draft Completed
– State Board of Education Information State Board of Education Information Item –Item –
•February 2006 – Conduct Pilot StudyFebruary 2006 – Conduct Pilot Study
– New EdYES! collection New EdYES! collection
•Spring 2007 - tentativeSpring 2007 - tentative
Next StepsNext Steps
•Electronic PortalElectronic Portal– Develop a uniform electronic portal to Develop a uniform electronic portal to
support continuous school improvement, support continuous school improvement, EdYES!, grants, and NCLB.EdYES!, grants, and NCLB.
– Links to other state initiatives Links to other state initiatives
• example – CIMSexample – CIMS
– Links to other school-based initiativesLinks to other school-based initiatives
• Example - NCAExample - NCA
Next StepsNext Steps
•Statewide disseminationStatewide dissemination•March 2006 – ISD’s and Ed Orgs.March 2006 – ISD’s and Ed Orgs.•April 27, 2006 – April 27, 2006 –
– School Improvement ConferenceSchool Improvement Conference– Framework, Applications, ToolsFramework, Applications, Tools– Bob MarzanoBob Marzano
Next StepsNext Steps
•Statewide dissemination – Statewide dissemination – cont’dcont’d•Fall 2006 – LEA rolloutFall 2006 – LEA rollout•Fall School Improvement Fall School Improvement Conference – Conference –
– Introduce EdYES! components and Introduce EdYES! components and electronic portalelectronic portal
•Spring 2007 – EdYES! data Spring 2007 – EdYES! data collectioncollection
Documents Available OnlineDocuments Available Online
•The Revised School
Improvement Framework and
this PowerPoint are available
online at www.mi.gov/osi
– Dr. Ed Roeber, Executive DirectorDr. Ed Roeber, Executive DirectorOffice of Educational Assessment and Office of Educational Assessment and
AccountabilityAccountability
Roebere@michigan.govRoebere@michigan.gov
– Dr. Yvonne Caamal Canul, DirectorDr. Yvonne Caamal Canul, DirectorOffice of School ImprovementOffice of School Improvement
Canuly@michigan.govCanuly@michigan.gov
– Linda Forward, SupervisorLinda Forward, SupervisorOffice of School ImprovementOffice of School Improvement
ForwardL@michigan.govForwardL@michigan.gov
Contact InformationContact Information
– Linda Howley, Department AnalystOffice of Educational Assessment and
Accountability
•HowleyL@michigan.gov
– Linda Kent, ConsultantOffice of School Improvement
•KentL2@michigan.gov
Contact Information – cont’d
top related