MARTIN JUNO Zurich #QSWUR QS Intelligence Unit · MARTIN JUNO QS Intelligence Unit 15 Quantifying scientific impact: networks, ... and INTERNATIONAL MOBILITY by fostering MOTIVATED

MARTIN JUNO

QS Intelligence Unit

Febru

ary

15

Quantifying scientific

impact: networks,

measures, insights?

12-13 February 2015

Zurich

#QSWUR

CAREER

DEVELOPMENT

EDUCATIONAL

ACHIEVEMENT and

INTERNATIONAL

MOBILITY by fostering

MOTIVATED

PEOPLE To enable

POTENTIAL to achieve their

around the

2

OUR AUDIENCE

PROSPECTIVE

STUDENTS

ACADEMICS

PROSPECTIVE

PARTNERS

SCHOLARSHIP

PROVIDERS

CURRENT

STUDENTS EMPLOYERS

UNIVERSITY

LEADERS

GOVERNMENT

ALUMNI

3

CONTEXTS

OUR WORK

4

LEAGUE

TABLES

SUBJECTS

ASPECTS TYPES QS Global

Employability Index

QS Global 200

Business Schools

CLASSIFICATIONS

IN NUMBERS

OVER

3,500 UNIVERSITIES

CONSIDERED

COVERED IN

500+ MAJOR MEDIA

OUTLETS

OVER

30 ACADEMIC

ADVISORS

OVER

20m DIRECT WEB

VISITORS

OVER

90k SURVEY

RESPONSES

LED BY

50+ YEARS’ RANKING

EXPERIENCE

OVER

60m TOTAL WEB

VISITORS

USED BY OVER

9 NATIONAL

GOVERNMENTS

JUST

29 NEW ENTRIES IN

2014

OVER

850 UNIVERSITIES

RANKED

RUN FOR

10 YEARS IN

2014

5

OU

R A

PP

RO

AC

H

WORLD

CLASS

UNIVERSITY

6

ACADEMIC

REPUTATION

FACULTY

STUDENT

CITATIONS

PER FACULTY

EMPLOYER

REPUTATION

INT’L

STUDENTS

INT’L

FACULTY

7

WEIGHTINGS HOW DO WE SET THEM?

APPROPRIATENESS

STRENGTH

OF DATA

LIMITING RELIANCE ON SELF-

REPORTED DATA

FEEDBACK FROM THE MARKET

DATA AVAILABILITY

8

EXPERT ADVICE

IS THERE A BIAS?

YES, ALL

RANKINGS

HAVE IT

FOCUS ON ONE

AREA ONLY

(Usually research)

LANGUAGE /

CULTURE

(English /

European)

WEIGHTINGS

How are they

defined? What’s the

purpose?

RESPONSE RATE

Is it enough?

HOW MANY

INSTITUTIONS TO

EVALUATE?

TEACHING,

RESEARCH,

SOCIAL IMPACT?

OVERALL OR BY

SUBJECT?

INDICATORS

WHERE TO STOP?

9

BUT WE ARE TRYING TO REDUCE IT…

SUBJECT RANKINGS

STRONGER SURVEYS

WE ARE EVALUATING MORE

INSTITUTONS

FIELD STANDARDIZATION?

REGIONAL RANKINGS

10

WE SUPPORT INSTITUTIONS TO

PROVIDE ACCURATE DATA

SURVEY MEASURES

DRAMATIC

SURVEY

RESPONSE

GROWTH

2010

2011

2012

15,050

5,007

33,785

16,744

46,079

25,564

2013

62,084

27,957

2014

63,676

28,759

2015 ?

11

ACADEMIC RESPONSES BY COUNTRY

12

REPUTATION SURVEYS

RISKS AND BENEFITS

SUBJECTIVE MEASURES

INADEQUATE SAMPLING

POLARISATION

LANGUAGE INDEPENDENT

POTENTIAL TO DETECT WHAT’S

HAPPENING NOW

13

INDEPENDENT OF SELF-REPORTING POTENTIAL VOLATILITY

‘HALO EFFECT’

DISCIPLINE INDEPENDENT

REPUTATION MATTERS…

EVEN IF YOU DON’T AGREE

THANK YOU

topuniversities.com

iu.qs.com

martin.juno@qs.com

intelligenceunit@qs.com

facebook.com/

universityrankings

@worlduniranking

#QSWUR

linkedin.com/in/martinjuno