March 2011 Co-funded by the Community programme eContentplus .
Post on 11-Jan-2016
214 Views
Preview:
Transcript
March 2011Co-funded by the
Community programme
eContentplus
www.arrow-net.eu
Rights Information Infrastructure (RII)Enables Digital Search and identification
System for identification of Rights status
In or out of copyright In or out of print / commercialised or not
Rights Which rights are involved
Rightholders Authors Publishers
How and where do I clear the rights Orphan Works Orphan Works
Registry
Objectives
Deliver a rights information infrastructure operable within and across borders Facilitate identification of rightholders (authors/publishers) Facilitate the identification of the IPR status
Provide test beds for Business models for digital libraries Registries for Orphan works (OW) and Out of Commerce
Works (OCW) Rights clearance mechanisms Model licences developed by the EC High Level Expert
Group (HLG) Interoperability and criteria for interoperability
EC i2010 Digital Libraries- A summary link between HLEG and ARROW
Digital Preservation
Orphan Works
Out-of-Print Works
Online Access OP Books
Business Models
Diligent search guidelines
•Registries/databases•Rights Clearance Centres
Model Licensing Agreement
Model Licensing Agreement
ARROW
(Accessible Registriesof Rights
Information on Orphan Works (and Out of Commerce
Works)
for Europeana
ARROW Contract Partners
Libraries Biblioteca Nacional de España (BNE)
Bibliothèque Nationale de France (BNF)
British Library (BL)
Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB)
Koninklijke Bibliotheek (KB)
Narodna in Univerzitetna Knijznica (NUK)
National Library of Norway (NLN)
University of Innsbruck (UIBK)
Publishers Associations Associazione Italiana Editori (AIE)
Federación de Gremios de Editores de España (FGEE)
Reproduction Rights Organisation Copyright Licensing Agency (CLA)
International Organisations Federation of European Publishers (FEP)
International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organisations (IFRRO)
Technology Developers Consorzio Interuniversitario per il Calcolo
Automatico dell’Italia Nord Orientale (CINECA)
NUMILOG
ISBN Agency Marketing und Verlagsservice des
Buchhandels (MVB)
ARROW Associated Partners
Libraries
European Digital Library (EDL)
Finish National Library (FNL)
Collecting Society representing Authors
Authors Licensing and Collecting Society (ALCS)
Stichting LIRA
Publishers Association
Syndicat National de l’Edition (SNE)
Publishers Licensing Society (PLS)
The Swedish Publishers Association
Reproduction Rights Organisations
Centro Español de Derechos Reprográficos (CEDRO)
Centre Français d’exploitation du droit de Copie (CFC)
Copy-Dan Writing Information (COPYDAN)
KOPINOR
KOPIOSTO
SAZOR
Workplan: general structure
Two WPs run along the whole project1. Project management (AIE)
2. Dissemination and Awareness (IFRRO)
Five WPs run for limited periods3. Legal framework and business models (FEP)
4. Interoperability (BNF)
5. Architecture design (MVB)
6. Set up of Rights Information Infrastructure (Cineca)
7. Validation (UIBK)
Leadership and Management structure
PROJECT LEADERSHIP
MANAGEMENT BOARD OF WP LEADERS
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
AIE
WP2
IFRRO
WP3
FEP
WP4
BNF
WP5
MVB
WP6
CINECA
WP7
UIBK
« ASSEMBLY of ALL PARTNERS »
ALL PARTNERS
« GENERAL ASSEMBLY »
CONTRACTING PARTNERS
ARROW Workflow
From the library request: -> Library submits a query to ARROWto a licence/information about a licence: -> RRO provides feedback to ARROW
and ARROW to library□ Based on metadata exchange□ Works on step by step metadata enrichment□ Involves Libraries, BiPs and RROs□ ARROW as interoperability facilitator
□to access and query different systems □ to retrieve the relevant data□ to process and exchange this data with other systems □ to add complementary data from other systems □ to produce new meaningful information
Information needed is stored in the systems of different organisations for their own specific purposes.
WorkflowBased on Quality controlled Information sources
Library
Libraryinterface
Matchingrecords
Clusteringeditions
VIAF
1st data collection
BiPTEL
Matchingand clustering
2nd data collection
RRO
Matchingrecords
3rd data collection
ROW
AWR
Validation
Role of Libraries
Libraries as End User □ Query the ARROW system to retrieve info on rights status□ Search ARROW□ Validate retrieved results and/or refine search
Libraries as Metadata Provider□ TEL: ARROW bibliographic metadata provider
for library domain□ VIAF: ARROW authors metadata provider□ National Libraries provide quality
□ metadata to TEL□ authority file to VIAF
Role of TEL
TEL as Metadata Provider
□Match library query with available records □ Purpose: identify the work
□Produce enriched record for the work
□ Retrieve records of other manifestations of the same work
□ Cluster the retrieved manifestation records in a work record
Role of BIPs
BIPs as Metadata Provider□ Provide data about in print/out of print status□ Provide data about publishers□ Add new books/manifestations records of the work
BIPs as End user□ Receive work level information &clustered manifestations□ Register International Standard Text Code (ISTC)
Project Cycle
Phase I(12 monthsSeptember
2008 -September
2009)
Legal framework & Business Models
Interoperability
Design of system architecture
Set up of right information infrastructure
Creation of Registry of Orphan Works
Network of clearing mechanisms
Assessment & Validation
Definition of methodology and preparation of tools
Testing of the system mechanisms
Phase II(12 months September
2009 – September
2010)
Phase III(12 months
February 2010 – February
2011)
Phases and milestones
Milestones1. 4 September 2008: Start up; First Management Board
meeting
2. 17 November 2008: First “General Assembly”
3. Aug 2009: all the preliminary deliverables are issued
4. March 2010: start up piloting of the system
5. Feb 2011: the elements have been validated
6. Feb 2011: the final release of the ARROW system
ARROW vs Manual diligent search
February 2011, the ARROW system is up and running and has shown an important time saving when submitting records for status clearance purposes compared to manual search
Pilot countries and early users
ARROW was piloted from February – December 2010 in:
France Germany Spain United Kingdom
Business Model
ARROW is designed to be business neutral (will serve equally national/government digitisation initiatives, private initiatives and Europeana)
The ARROW infrastructure will be organised on a federated way
Due to its network nature, the ARROW system consists also of a set of relationships with other players
The relationship with other entities could take the form of a network of contractual links
Benefit of using ARROWARROW search = 5 % of Manual search time
Time save using ARROWSearch for author, publisher, work, status
Manual ARROW
344
52
3
12.7 3.5
184
4.5
Time saved using ARROW in hours; 63 – 102 recordsFrance Germany Spain UK
Business Model
Business Model
Key Elements*
* To be refined under ARROW plus starting 1 April 2011
1. Organisational Background
2. Value Propositions Competitive
advantage
3. Business Architecture
4. Funding Model and budget
Business Model1. Organisational background
Identification of Rights Authors and Publisher Right status
Facilitate Rights Clearance
Build Registry of Orphan Works (ROW)
Key strategies: Close information gap; enhance cost efficiency
Business Model2. Value Propositions
Core service: Facilitate search Interoperability: Open standards deployment Competitive advantage: Include all
stakeholders Authors; Publishers; RROs; Libraries Standards bodies
Business neutral: Open to all interested Libraries; commercial users; publishers; authors Collective Management Organisations (CMO)
ARROW Business Model3. Business Architecture
Rights Information Infrastructure (RII) ARROW Data Centre: Manages work flow; Website Query; Retrieve information Processes information in existing registries
The European Library (TEL) Books in Print Databases (BiP) Reproduction Rights Organisations (RRO)
ARROW Works Registry (AWR) Collection of all information from the workflow
Registry of Orphan Works (ROW)
ARROW Business Model4. Funding Model
Financial support from European Commission System Development and further Enhancement
Fee per use
Subscription Larger users and multiple use
Public institutions Flat fee per inhabitant - € 0,0011
Allows free use in all public institutions
Co-funded by the Community programme
eContentplus
http://www.arrow-net.eu
FURTHER INFORMATION
top related