Many-body Rabi oscillations in Rydberg atomic ensemblessites.lsa.umich.edu/.../592/...Final-Presentation.pdf · Quantum Optics Final Project Generation of Entanglement –CNOT Gate

Post on 10-Oct-2020

0 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

Quantum Optics Final Project

Many-body Rabi oscillations in Rydberg atomic ensembles

Huy Nguyen

Quantum Optics Final Project

April 17th, 2018

Quantum Optics Final Project

Outline

▪ Applications of Rydberg atoms in quantum information

▪ Many-body Rabi oscillations▪ Excitation dynamics in small lattices

▪ Decoherence mechanisms▪ Multiply excited Rydberg states▪ Intermediate P state excitations

▪ Generation of entanglement

Quantum Optics Final Project

Rydberg Atoms

Tunable Interactions [1]

▪ Interaction strength over 12 orders of magnitude

[1] M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Molmer, RMP 82, 2313 (2010)

[2] S.-Y. Lan et al., Opt. Exp. 17, 13639 (2009)

Multiplexed Quantum Memory [2]

▪ Many applications in quantum information

Quantum Optics Final Project

Single atom qubits [1]

▪ Pro: Easier implementation

▪ Con: Slow manipulations of quantum state

Rydberg Mediated Quantum Gates

[1] M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Molmer, RMP 82, 2313 (2010)

Ensemble qubits

▪ Pro: Strong atom-field coupling

▪ Con: Dependent on Rydberg blockade mechanism

Quantum Optics Final Project

Excitation dynamics in small lattices

Excitations driven by coherent laser:

Interactions between excited states:

[3] G. Wu et al. / Physics Letters A 379 (2015) 143-148

Quantum Optics Final Project

Toy Model – 3 Site Lattice

Reflection symmetry imposed by open boundary condition [3]

Symmetric Subspace Reduction

[3] G. Wu et al. / Physics Letters A 379 (2015) 143-148

Quantum Optics Final Project

Excitation dynamics in small lattices

Weak Interaction Strength

▪ Periodic beating

Strong Rydberg Interaction

▪ Coherent oscillations▪ No visible damping

[3] G. Wu et al. / Physics Letters A 379 (2015) 143-148

Quantum Optics Final Project

Decoherence due to neighboring atoms

▪ Damped Rabi oscillations

10 Lattice Site Dynamics

Rich Excitation Dynamics

▪ Collapse and revival of Rydberg polariton

[3] G. Wu et al. / Physics Letters A 379 (2015) 143-148

Quantum Optics Final Project

Many Body Rabi Oscillations

[4] Y. O. Dudin, L. Li, F. Bariani, and A. Kuzmich, Nat. Phys. 8, 790 (2012)

Collective Dicke States

Enhancement of Atom-Field Coupling We wish to model inhomogeneous lightshift caused by doubly excited statesonto singly excited Rydberg states

Quantum Optics Final Project

Possible dephasing mechanisms

▪ Collisions

▪ Atomic motion

▪ Radiative decay

▪ Atom loss

▪ Stark shifts

Quantum Optics Final Project

Interaction-induced inhomogeneous lightshifts

Effective Hamiltonian to model decoherence:

Strategy:

▪ Consider uniform excitation Ω𝑖= Ω𝑗 = Ω

▪ Solve low dimensional Hilbert system analytically

▪ Perform spatial average of positiondependent light shifts across sample distribution

Quantum Optics Final Project

Two Dimensional Hilbert Space – Analytic Solutions

Collective states

Analytic expressions for coefficients

[4] Y. O. Dudin, L. Li, F. Bariani, and A. Kuzmich, Nat. Phys. 8, 790 (2012)

Effective Rabi Frequency

Quantum Optics Final Project

Probability Density Function – Uniform vs Gaussian

Gaussian vs Uniform density sphere

Probability density function for n-dimensional sphere with Gaussian density distribution

Probability density function for n-dimensional sphere with uniform density distribution [5]

[5] Shu-Ju Tu and Ephraim Fishbach (2001)

Quantum Optics Final Project

Probability Density Function – Uniform vs Gaussian

Gaussian vs Uniform Density Sphere

Probability density function for 3-dimensional sphere with Gaussian density distribution

Probability density function for 3-dimensional sphere with uniform density distribution

[5] Shu-Ju Tu and Ephraim Fishbach (2001)

Quantum Optics Final Project

Analytic expressions for averaged coefficients

Gaussian density distribution averaged:Airy and Airy prime functions

Uniform density distribution averaged : Gamma and Incomplete Gamma functions

Quantum Optics Final Project

Estimating blockade parameters

van der Waals coefficient [6]

Bounds for van der Waals shift Ratio characterizing blockade

[4] Y. O. Dudin, L. Li, F. Bariani, and A. Kuzmich, Nat. Phys. 8, 790 (2012)[6] L.Beguin et al. PRL (2013)

Effective Rabi frequency of two-photon transition

Quantum Optics Final Project

Varying blockade ratio - Dephasing

+

-

Quantum Optics Final Project

Multi-excitation induced Stark shifts

Atom-Field Hamiltonian

[7] P. Berman

Wish to investigate the effect of multiple atoms in the intermediate 𝑝 state

Quantum Optics Final Project

3 Atom Collective State Amplitudes

Quantum Optics Final Project

Collective amplitudes

System of differential equations for collective amplitudes

Multiple p excitations causes effective damping of Rabi oscillation

[7] P. Berman

Quantum Optics Final Project

Generation of Entanglement – CNOT Gate

Generating Bell State

1. Prepare two qubit input state:

2. Apply CNOT gate:

3. Output state is maximally entangled (ideal scenario)

Quantum Optics Final Project

Measure of Entanglement

Violation of Bell inequality

Overlap with Bell State

Increase in entanglement with more atoms and stronger Rydberg blockade

Quantum Optics Final Project

Summary

▪ Rydberg ensemble qubits allow for fast quantum state preparation and manipulation

▪ Several mechanisms lead to damping of Rabi oscillations▪ Doubly excited Rydberg states▪ Multiple intermediate P state excitations

▪ Breakdown of Rydberg blockade leads to reduced fidelity of quantum gate operations

▪ Combine both mechanisms as well as include additional effects such as atom loss and radiative decay.

Quantum Optics Final Project

Questions?

Quantum Optics Final Project

References

[1] M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Molmer, RMP 82, 2313 (2010)

[2] S.-Y. Lan et al., Opt. Exp. 17, 13639 (2009)

[3] G. Wu et al. / Physics Letters A 379 (2015) 143-148

[4] Y. O. Dudin, L. Li, F. Bariani, and A. Kuzmich, Nat. Phys. 8, 790 (2012)

[5] Shu-Ju Tu and Ephraim Fishbach (2001)

[6] L.Beguin et al. PRL (2013)

[7] Paul R. Berman, V. S. (2011). Principles of Laser Spectroscopy and Quantum Optics.Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Quantum Optics Final Project

Supplementary : Preparation Fidelity

top related