Management of the Niemen River basin with account of ... · Management of the Niemen River basin with account of adaptation to climate change Assessment of current status of water
Post on 18-Jul-2020
0 Views
Preview:
Transcript
Management of the Niemen River basin with
account of adaptation to climate change
Assessment of current status of water resources
in the Niemen River Basin
Vladimir Korneev, Egidijus Rimkus
v_korn@rambler.ru egidijus.rimkus@gf.vu.lt
With contribution:
Edvinas Stonevicius, Vilnius University, Lithuania;
Aliaksandr Pakhomau, Lubov Hertman, CRICUWR, Minsk, Belarus;
Audrius Šepikas, Environmental Protection Agency, Lithuania;
Nickolai Denisov, Zoï environment network, Switzerland
The main goal is improvement of the integrated water resources
management using the basin approach in the climate change
context by the example of the Niemen River
Meteorological and hydrological data collection and quality analysis
(data from 1961 to 2010);
Statistical analysis and evaluation of changes of meteorological and
hydrological characteristics;
Assessment of the future climate condition and forecast for near-term
future (2035; mean value of 2021-2050) according to A1B and B1
emission scenarios using regional CCLM climate model outputs;
Preliminary projections of runoff changes in the Niemen River basin in
the context of climate change using two different hydrological models.
Activities in 2012 and main reached results
Meteorological and
hydrological data
collection
Meteorological and hydrological information which was
used:
(daily, monthly, seasonal, annual values)
Analysis period: 1961-2010
Temperature/precipitation:
Data from 23 stations (8 stations in Belarus, 15 stations in
Lithuania)
Water discharge:
Data from 25 stations (12 stations in Belarus, 13 stations in
Lithuania)
Additional information necessary for hydrological modeling:
wind speed, humidity, sunshine duration
Assessment of current status of water resources in the Niemen River Basin
Assessment of current status of water resources in the Niemen River Basin
Detected changes of
meteorological and
hydrological characteristics
Assessment of the change of temperature (0C) in the Niemen River Basin (1986-2010) - (1961-
1985): on average +0.93 0C
2.4
2.0
1.31.2
0.2 0.2
1.4
0.9
0.20.1
0.0
0.5
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Januar
y
Febru
ary
Mar
chApril
May
June
July
August
Sep
tem
ber
Oct
ober
Nove
mber
Dec
ember
Mo
nth
s (
dif
fere
nc
e,
0C
)
Air temperature
Assessment of current status of water resources in the Niemen River Basin
Assessment of current status of water resources in the Niemen River Basin
Assessment of current status of water resources in the Niemen River Basin
Precipitation amount
Assessment of the change of precipitation (%) in the Niemen River Basin (1986-2010) - (1961-
1985): on average +6.98%
8.28.9
5.3
-6.5
0.0
2.4
8.0
6.7
3.5
0.9
-7.0
-0.4
-8.0
-6.0
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
Januar
y
Febru
ary
Mar
chApril
May
June
July
August
Sep
tem
ber
Oct
ober
Nove
mber
Dec
ember
Mo
nth
s (
dif
fere
nc
e, %
)
Assessment of current status of water resources in the Niemen River Basin
Assessment of current status of water resources in the Niemen River Basin
Assessment of current status of water resources in the Niemen River Basin
Water discharge
Assessment of the change of runoff (%) in the Niemen River Basin (1985-2009) - (1961-
1984): average annual +2.7%; minimum (summer-autumn) +7.2%;
minimum (winter) +17.5%; maximum (spring) -27.4%
42.044.2
6.7
-19.9
-5.2
2.95.9
0.9
5.7
0.4
-1.5
6.9
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
Januar
y
Febru
ary
Mar
chApri
l
May
June
July
August
Sep
tem
ber
Oct
ober
Nove
mber
Dec
ember
Mo
nth
s (
dif
fere
nc
e,
%)
Hydrograph shape at the Dubysa (a) and the Niemen (b) rivers during two parts of
the study period 1960-1984 and 1985-2009
Assessment of current status of water resources in the Niemen River Basin
Assessment of current status of water resources in the Niemen River Basin
The main tendencies and trends:
Statistically significant increase in annual, winter and
summer temperature (largest changes were observed in
January);
Statistically significant increase in winter precipitation;
Maximum spring flood discharge decreased and the
minimum winter flow increased statistically significant in
large part of territory
Peak of spring flood and the dates of minimum winter flow
tends occur earlier in the whole basin area.
Detected changes of meteorological and hydrological
characteristics
Future climate
projections
Two greenhouse gas emission scenarios
were used
A1B (relatively high-emission scenario)
B1 (low-emission scenario)
Near-term forecast 2020-2050 was made
Climate projections for the whole Nemunas basin was made
with using CCLM model outputs
The regional CCLM model covers a large
part of the European territory with a high
spatial resolution (20 km 20 km).
The regional CCLM model runs are driven
by the initial and boundary conditions of the
Global Circulation Model ECHAM5/MPI-OM.
Realizations of the ECHAM5/MPI-OM model
were dynamically downscaled to a smaller grid
using the CCLM model.
Air temperature projections
Assessment of the future change of temperature in the Niemen River Basin until 2035 (mean
value of 2021-2050). On average: A1B +1.7 0C; B1 +1.36
0C
2.4
2.8 2.8
1.7
1.8
0.7
1.0
0.7
1.1
1.3
1.6
2.8
0.8
2.12.2
1.4
0.8
0.3
1.5
0.9
0.7
1.3
1.7
2.6
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
Januar
y
Febru
ary
Mar
ch
April
May
June
July
August
Sep
tem
ber
Oct
ober
Nove
mber
Dec
ember
ch
an
ge,
0C
A1B scenario
B1 scenatio
A1B
B1
Annual
A1B
Winter
B1
Precipitation amount
Assessment of the future change of precipitation in the Niemen River Basin until 2035
(mean value of 2021-2050). On average: A1B +6.51%; B1 +2.42%
9.1
6.7
14.0
12.1
1.9
5.0
2.9
5.1
2.5 2.6
6.9
9.3
-4.3
3.6
6.4 6.7
-8.0
-0.7
-4.8
2.2
6.8
9.5
4.4
7.2
-10.0
-5.0
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Januar
y
Febru
ary
Mar
ch
April
May
June
July
August
Sep
tem
ber
Oct
ober
Nove
mber
Dec
ember
ch
an
ge
, %
A1B scenario
B1 scenatio
`
Annual
A1B
B1
Winter
A1B
B1
Summer
A1B
B1
Projections of runoff
changes in the Niemen
River basin
Prediction of Niemen River basin runoff changes were made using
WatBal hydrological model.
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
1.00
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Ags Spt
Oct
Nov
Dec Jan
Observed
A1B
B1
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
0.90
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Ags Spt
Oct
Nov
Dec Jan
Observed
A1B
B1
Merkys
Schara
Planned future activities
Forecasting the runoff of the Niemen River basin in the context of
climate change and with account of different scenarios for water use
and socio-economic development;
Analysis of the hydrometeorological, hydrochemical and
hydrobiological monitoring systems in the Niemen River transboundary
basin and assessment of the needs for these systems optimization for
climate change monitoring (including emergency cases);
Estimation and forecast of the future climate change impact on the
water quality;
Elaboration of the common information platform (Internet database),
containing data on water resources management and adaptation to
climate change for the Niemen River basin countries and
recommendations for the improvement of the water management in
the Niemen River Basin with account of adaptation to climate change.
Parameter TYPE
1 2 3 4 5
River basin area,
km2 <100 100-1000 >1000
River slope, m/km - <0,7 >0,7 <0,3 >0,3
Lake depth < 3 3-9 >9
Assessment of water quality based on the European System of
Classification (e.g. Lithuanian experience)
Typology of rivers and lakes (Lithuanian experience)
No. Quality element Parame
ter
Lake
type
Paramete
r value for
reference
condition
s
Criteria for ecological status classes of lakes
according to parameter values for the physico-
chemical quality element
High Good Moderate Poor Bad
1
General
conditions Nutrients
Nt, mg/l 1, 2 1 <1.30 1.30-
1.80 1.81-2.30
2.31-
3.00 >3.00
2 Nt, mg/l 3 0.75 <0.90 0.90-
1.20 1.21-1.60
1.61-
2.00 >2.00
3 Pt, mg/l 1, 2 0.02 <0.040 0.040-
0.060
0.061-
0.090
0.091
-
0.140
>0.140
4 Pt, mg/l 3 0.015 <0.030 0.030-
0.050
0.051-
0.070
0.071
-
0.100
>0.100
Assessment of water quality based on the European System of
Classification
Classification of ecological status of lakes
(Lithuanian experience)
No. Quality element Paramet
er
River
type
Parameter
value for
reference
conditions
*
Criteria for ecological status classes of
rivers according to parameter values for
physico-chemical quality elements
High Good Mode
rate Poor Bad
1
General
data
Nutrien
ts
NO3-N,
mg/l 1-5 0.9 <1.30
1.30-
2.30
2.31-
4.50
4.51 -
10.00 >10.00
2 NH4+N,
mg/l 1-5 0.06 <0.10
0.10-
0.20
0.21-
0.60
0.61-
1.50 >1.50
3 Nt, mg/l 1-5 1.4 <2.00 2.00-
3.00
3.01-
6.00
6.01-
12.00 >12.00
4 PO4-P,
mg/l 1-5 0.03 <0.050
0.050-
0.090
0.091-
0.180
0.181-
0.400 >0.400
5 Pt, mg/l 1-5 0.06 <0.100 0.100-
0.140
0.141-
0.230
0.231-
0.470 >0.470
6 Organic
matter
BOD7,
mg/l 1-5 1.8 <2.30
2.30-
3.30
3.31-
5.00
5.01-
7.00 >7.00
7 Oxygen
ation
O2, mg/l 1, 3, 4,
5 9.5 >8.50
8.50-
7.50
7.49-
6.00
5.99-
3.00 <3.00
8 O2, mg/l 2 8.5 >7.50 7.50-
6.50
6.49-
5.00
4.99-
2.00 <2.00
Assessment of water quality based on the European System of
Classification
Classification of ecological status of rivers (Lithuanian experience)
Thank you for attention !
River Niemen in Grodno (Belarus)
top related