Lifetimes in Stable Beams revisited
Post on 22-Feb-2016
38 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Transcript
1
Lifetimes in Stable Beams revisited
Mike Lamont, Olli Johnson*
*Oxford University
Observations. No model. No bunch-by-bunch.
2
Input data• For all SB fill > 8 hours:– Extract (Java API) from logging database:• TCP BLM data B1,B2,IR3,IR7 • DBCT data B1,B2• ATLAS, CMS and LHCb luminosity• BSRT where available
– Extract (Python) ATLAS luminous region data from LPC AFS repository
– Data cleaning, fits etc. in Mathematica
Will show plots from a variety of specific fills – analysis performed for all fills over 8 hours (~95 fills)
3
Method• Single beam– Rolling fit single beam lifetime from BCT – Reconstruct losses/lifetimes to collimation– Reconstruct losses/lifetimes to luminosity
• Luminosity– Rolling fit luminosity lifetime– Global fit luminosity lifetime (1 & 8 hours)– Calculate emittance growth from luminous region– Calculate effective emittance growth from luminosity– Calculate lifetime components
Start playing…
4
SINGLE BEAM LIFETIME
5
Stable beams – where do the protons go?
• Luminosity– Inelastic - experiments– Diffractive – down-stream of IP, momentum cleaning– Elastic - nearly all scattered particles will stay well inside
the beam (3σ) – gentle emittance growth• Betatron cleaning• Momentum cleaning• Scattering on Residual Gas– (multiple) Coulomb, proton-nucleus (inelastic, elastic..) –
local losses, gentle emittance growth
6
In this paper, we calculate the calibration factor for the BLM downstream ofthe primary collimators in IR7 (TCP.A) that can measure horizontal, vertical and skew primary losses in IR7 and use the BLM running sum of 1.3 s, therefore losses in otherlocations (such as IR3) will not be taken into account for this analysis.
Lifetime Analysis at High Intensity Colliders Applied to the LHCB. Salvachua, R.W. Aßmann, R. Bruce, F. Burkart, S. Redaelli, G. Valentino, D. WollmannIPAC 2013
“Notice that the intensity lost due to luminosity burn-off is not subtracted.”
7
Calculate loss rates• Luminosity – calculate losses based on “visible” cross-
section at 4 TeV (74.9 mbarn) for ATLAS, CMS, LHCb.• Use “squeeze” calibration factor to establish other
losses, principally IR7– while recognizing some losses to IR3 (see below)
• Ignore for the moment:– residual gas; small diffractive component
• Sum loss rates to get overall dN/dt• Calculate lifetimes
8
Typical loss breakdown
10
Single beam lifetimes
• Fit to BCT data – sliding 10 minute window• Lifetime from loss contribution from IR7 and luminosity
Good agreement giving some confidence that the approach is valid
11
Cross-check 1/2
Note same factor used for both B1 and B2 – optimization possible
Where’s the difference coming from?
12
IR3 losses
Starts to become reasonably significant for beam 1 in later fillsGiven a IR3 calibration factor (!) could easily be taken in account
13
Cross check 2/2
• Remarkable – no tweaking!• Note low IR3 losses both beams
14
OCP• 7th August 2012:– Flip of octupole polarity plus increase in current– Significant increase of Q’H and Q’V at end ramp
and through squeeze– Octupoles and chromaticity reduced in collision
beam process and then trimmed down further in SB.
• Opened way for increase in bunch population (and peak luminosity)
15
Loss breakdown
Before OCP
After OCP
16
Single beam lifetime breakdown
17
Losses versus intensity
Further optimization of octupoles and chromaticity might have been possible.But wait for the first hour to pass!
2710: peak lumi 6.76e333192: peak lumi 6.66e33
18
Lifetimes versus intensity
Cost?Average luminosity lifetime over 8 hours: 12.4 hours before OPC, 10.5 hours after… of the order 10 pb-1 per fill
19
2011- lifetimes
2011 - losses
20
• Not as good agreement with BCT – relative losses in IR3 considerably higher (looser collimator settings of course)
• Trade off beta*/collimator settings against losses and luminosity lifetime? And other problems….
21
LUMINOSITY
22
Luminosity lifetime
• Rolling 20 minute window
23
First 8 hours – global fit
Note that first hour
24
2011 – first hour’s always been with us.
25
Luminosity lifetime
26
Luminous region (ATLAS)
27
Emittance from luminous region
• Standard picture: • Emittances similar at t=0• Steeper increase in horizontal – flattening• Almost linear in vertical
Naively calculate corresponding emittances
28
29
Inferred emittance from luminosity
Given L etc. calculate through a fill.
• Implicit assumption here is that all luminosity reduction besides the loss of particles from the beam is due to emittance growth.
• This likely true in the first approximation but other mechanisms are present.• These include: the effect of increasing bunch length/beam size on the geometric
reduction factor and the hour glass effect, • The effect of orbit drifts on beam separation at the interaction point are also present.• Also implicit: b1 = b2, x = y
30
Luminous region emittance
From local and global fit:Emittance growth rate: ~0.15 micron/hourInitial lifetime around 16 hours
31
Luminous region emittance
Using only the global fit:Initial emittance growth rate: ~0.15 micron/hourInitial lifetime around 17 hours
32
Comparison of inferred and LR
33
Emittance growth• Emittance growth mechanisms include :– Elastic scattering at the interaction points,– Elastic scattering from residual gas,– Intra-beam scattering,– Non-linear resonances,– Incoherent beam-beam,– Electron cloud,– Noise, for example, power supplies, phase and
amplitude noise in the RF system, ground motion,– Long range beam-beam
34
IBS - reminder• Dispersion
– Arises from the change in longitudinal momentum in a collision at a location of nonzero dispersion.
– Leads to an effective change in the transverse coordinates of the colliding particles with respect to off-momentum orbits.
– The larger the dispersion, the faster the IBS emittance growth from this effect.• Betatron Coupling
– If the vertical dispersion is negligible, but there is some H-V coupling, we expect the horizontal IBS emittance growth to feed directly into the vertical plane.
– In the case that the vertical emittance growth is given entirely by betatron coupling
450 GeV May 2012 MS/ML
CourtesySekazi K. Mtingwa
35
Luminosity lifetime breakdown
Dominated by losses rather than emittance growth
36
The first hour• High losses and fast emittance growth – beam-beam driven • Low luminosity lifetime as a result.• “Beam-beam tolerance” thanks to a remarkably efficient
collimation system
“Beam-beam limit phenomenon is observed in degradation of luminosity lifetime and/or beam lifetime in hadron colliders.”
37
Conclusions• Loss rates and lifetimes through SB reconstructed• More beam on collimators than to luminosity!• OPC caused lifetime degradation– presumably recoverable by appropriate optimization, but
avoid the first hour• Possible input to beta*/collimator setting choice• Luminosity lifetime– Besides luminosity burn – significant component to losses
on collimators – And initially emittance growth
top related