Key Questions
Post on 20-Jan-2016
31 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Transcript
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
UKCCSC MeetingUKCCSC Meeting1818thth April April
NottinghamNottingham
Natural analogues of CONatural analogues of CO22 leakage leakage
from the Colorado Plateaufrom the Colorado Plateau
Stuart Gilfillan, Stuart Haszeldine, Zoe Shipton and Stuart Gilfillan, Stuart Haszeldine, Zoe Shipton and Mark WilkinsonMark Wilkinson
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
Key QuestionsKey Questions
1. How do natural CO2 storage sites fail?
- Faults, lithology, caprock seal and groundwater regime.
2. What are the pathways of CO2 migration to the surface?
- Can we predict/prevent leakage in engineered sites?
3. How long does CO2 migration to the surface take?
- CO2 needs to be stored for 10,000 years.
4. Can leakage of CO2 be monitored and quantified?
- Which chemical tracers can be used.
- How effective are they at monitoring natural CO2 leakage?
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
Colorado PlateauColorado Plateau
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
Colorado PlateauColorado PlateauGreen River Seeps and Salt
Wash fault zone, Utah
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
- Cold water springs and geysers
driven by pressure of CO2.
- Gas is 95 - 99% CO2
- 0.5 - 3.5 % N2
- Trace noble gases.
- CO2 release from > 80ka.
- Where does this water and CO2
originate from?
- How is this CO2 being transported
to the surface?
Green River Seeps and Salt
Wash fault zone, Utah
Crystal geyser, Utah
Colorado PlateauColorado Plateau
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
Origin of the Water?Origin of the Water?
- Salinity of erupted water indicates migration of water from deep aquifer.
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
Deepaquifer
Shallowaquifer
Origin of the Water?Origin of the Water?
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
From Ballentine et al. 2002
Magmatic ComponentMagmatic Component
33HeHe
Origin of the COOrigin of the CO22??
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
From Ballentine et al. 2002
Magmatic ComponentMagmatic Component
33HeHe
Atmospheric ComponentAtmospheric Component
AquiferAquifer RechargeRecharge2020NeNe3636ArAr8484KrKr
Formation WaterFormation Water
Origin of the COOrigin of the CO22??
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
From Ballentine et al. 2002
Magmatic ComponentMagmatic Component
33HeHe
RadiogenicRadiogenicComponentComponent
In-situ In-situ productionproduction
44HeHe2121NeNe4040ArAr
Atmospheric ComponentAtmospheric Component
AquiferAquifer RechargeRecharge2020NeNe3636ArAr8484KrKr
Formation WaterFormation Water
Accumulate Accumulate in groundwaterin groundwater
Origin of the COOrigin of the CO22??
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
Origin of the COOrigin of the CO22 – CO – CO22//33He ratioHe ratio
• Mantle CO2/3He range: 1 x 109 – 1 x 1010
• Measured from Mid Ocean Ridge Basalts - MORBs
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
70 75 80 85 90 95 1001.00e+6
1.00e+7
1.00e+8
1.00e+9
1.00e+10
1.00e+11
1.00e+12
CO2 Concentration (%)
Mantle (MORB) range: 1 x 10Mantle (MORB) range: 1 x 1099 – 1 x 10 – 1 x 101010
Above 1 x 10Above 1 x 101010::
Crustal COCrustal CO22
Below 1 x 10Below 1 x 1099: CO: CO22
lost relative to lost relative to 33He.He.
Origin of the COOrigin of the CO22 – CO – CO22//33He ratioHe ratioC
O2/3
He
Rat
io
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
• Predominantly crustal derived CO2 erupted from the Green River seeps.
• Small mantle component → 1 – 16%
Mantle (MORB) range: 1 x 10Mantle (MORB) range: 1 x 1099 – 1 x 10 – 1 x 101010
1 - 16%
Mantle CO2
Origin of the COOrigin of the CO22 – CO – CO22//33He ratioHe ratio
70 75 80 85 90 95 1001.00e+6
1.00e+7
1.00e+8
1.00e+9
1.00e+10
1.00e+11
1.00e+12Green River Seeps
CO2 Concentration (%)
CO
2/3
He
Rat
io
Mantle (MORB) range: 1 x 10Mantle (MORB) range: 1 x 1099 – 1 x 10 – 1 x 101010
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
ConclusionsConclusions
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
Other natural analogues of COOther natural analogues of CO2 2 leakageleakageHurricane Fault, Utah
- Active, steeply dipping normal fault ~ 250 km long,
~2.5 km displacement.
- CO2 & 40°C water discharges from fault zone.
- Noble gas and δ13C (CO2) analysis underway.
- No evidence of a CO2 reservoir at depth.
Hurricane fault looking north www.skytrailsranch.com
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
Other natural analogues of COOther natural analogues of CO2 2 leakageleakageHurricane Fault, Utah
- Active, steeply dipping normal fault ~ 250 km long,
~2.5 km displacement.
- CO2 & 40°C water discharges from fault zone.
- Noble gas and δ13C (CO2) analysis underway.
- No evidence of a CO2 reservoir at depth.
St. Johns Dome
- Large natural CO2 reservoir (445 billion m3).
- CO2 rich surface seeps and travertines.
- Composition of deep gas and waters known.
- Can natural CO2 can be chemically tagged?
e.g. using δ13C(CO2) and/or noble gases.
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
St. Johns Dome WorkflowSt. Johns Dome Workflow
- Water samples collected from 18 surface seeps
- 14C & tritium for groundwater dating.
- Solute chemistry.
- Noble gas, δ13C(CO2), δ18O and δD isotopes.
- Compare composition of surface seeps to
known chemistry of reservoir fluids.
- Use geochemical modeling to determine and
quantify mineralogy changes as CO2 migrates.
- Reservoir models underway to investigate CO2
migration pathways and timescales.
School of GeoSciencesSchool of GeoSciencesSubsurface Research GroupSubsurface Research Group
SummarySummary
1. How do natural CO2 storage sites fail?
- Primary mechanism is migration along fault planes.
2. What are the pathways of CO2 migration to the
surface?
- CO2 is dissolved into the groundwater and
transported along faults.
3. How long does CO2 migration to the surface take?
- Unknown at present, dating of CO2 deposits will
hopefully provide a timeframe.
4. Can leakage of CO2 be monitored and quantified?
- Yes, a baseline geochemical survey helps a lot!
top related