JPEG2000 Enables Wireless HD Video Distribution in the … · noting that JPEG2000 can perform lossless compression, which may be attractive in high end wired and wireless HD ...

www.analog.com

JPEG2000 Enables Wireless HDVideo Distribution in the Home

JPEG2000 Is Ideal for Wireless Video• Lowlatency—lessthanoneframe

• MorerobusttoerrorsthanMPEG-X

• Errorresiliencyincreasesrange

• Fixedbitratesimplifiesdesign

JPEG2000 Is Ideal for Consumer Applications• Capableofreal-timeHDcompression

• Symmetricencodeanddecode

• Lowcost,lowcomplexity

• Noexternalmemoryrequired

JPEG2000 Code Stream Is Scalable for Resolution and Quality• Singleencodedstreamcansupplydifferentresolutiondisplays

• Freethumbnailimagesavailable

• Dynamicallyadjustablebitrate:tradequalityforbandwidth

• Reducefilesizebyreducingquality,withouttranscoding

2

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Since most video reaches the home as MPEG-2, why not just send it wirelessly?

A: (NotethatalthoughMPEG-2isusedinthisFAQ,thesameprinciplesapplytoanswersforanytemporalscheme.)MostMPEG-2videostreamsarealreadydecodedbeforebeingsenttotheTVforvariousreasons:toaddmenuoverlays,programguides,etc.Thisistrueformostset-topboxes,DVDplayers,anddigitalbroadcastreceivers.ThevideoistheneithersenttotheTVinanuncompressedformatorisrecompressedusinganinexpensiveencoder(forSDresolution).

Somevideosourcesaren’tencodedinMPEG-2,orthereisnoaccesstotheMPEG-2signal.OutputsfromPCsandmanyDVDplayersfeatureuncompressedanalogordigitalvideoformats,suchasDVIandHDMI.ThesewillhavetobecompressedinrealtimebeforebeingwirelesslytransmittedfromaPCorDVDplayertoadisplay.Thecostofareal-timeHDMPEG-2encoderisroughly$20,000;clearlythisisnotasolutionintendedfortheconsumermarket.

JPEG2000permitslowcost,real-timecompressionofHDvideo,enablinginteractiveapplicationsandthetransmissionofmenuoverlays.

Q: If I do have access to the MPEG-2 stream, why not send it wirelessly?

A: Thevideocommunityhasidentifiedtwomajorproblemswithvideoinwirelessenvironments:errorresiliencyandlatency.Unlesstheapplicationisinteractive,latencyislessofanissuethanerrorresiliency.

AnerrorinanI-frameisvisiblethroughtheentiregroupofpictures(GOP),soasingletransmissionerrorcanresultinseveralframescontainingerrors,creatingdisturbingartifacts.JPEG2000compresseseachframeindividually,soerrorsdonotpropagateacrossframes.Also,JPEG2000isawavelet-basedscheme,anderrorsinthecodestreamtendto“soften”thepicture,notcreateblockyartifacts.AlthoughJPEG2000isadigitalcompressionscheme,itoffersananalog-likegracefuldegradationofimagequality.

Q: Why not use MPEG-2 I-frame-only transmission? That way errors wouldn’t propagate across multiple frames.

A:Thisrequiresreal-timecompression,andwhilereal-timeMPEG-2encodersdoexist,real-timeHDMPEG-2encodersareveryexpensiveandcomplex.Likemostcompressionschemes,MPEG-2wasdesignedtobemorecomplexontheencodesidethanthedecode;MPEG-2simplywasn’tintendedforuseinhighvolumeencodeapplications.

Let’ssuppose,though,thatreal-timeHDI-frame-onlyMPEG-2encodingisfeasible.I-frame-onlyMPEG-2streamsaremuchhigherbandwidththantypicalstreamsandrequiresubstantiallymoreresourcestodecode.MostMPEG-2decodersaren’tbuilttohandlethesebandwidths.Newdecoderswouldhavetobedeployed,andtheywouldbesubstantiallymorecomplexandexpensivethanexistingdecoders.

Q: Doesn’t JPEG2000 consume a lot more bandwidth than MPEG-2?

A: Actualefficiencyisdifferentdependingonwhetherthetransmissionchanneliserror-free(wired)ornoisy(wirelessorpowerline).Inawiredchannelwithnoerrors,JPEG2000consumesabouttwicethebandwidthasMPEG-2forSDandHDvideo,atsimilarqualitylevels.ForcableTVbroadcastorDVDcompression,JPEG2000isnotcompetitivewithMPEG-2.However,asimageresolutionincreasesto1080pandbeyond,MPEG-2becomeslessandlessefficient.MPEG-2encodecomplexityincreasesexponentiallyastheimagesizeincreases,butJPEG2000complexityisroughlylinear.Atsomepoint,JPEG2000becomesmoreefficient,whichisonereasonitwaschosenbytheDigitalCinemaInitiative.It’salsoworthnotingthatJPEG2000canperformlosslesscompression,whichmaybeattractiveinhighendwiredandwirelessHDtransmissions.Forsimilarqualityinanerror-freetransmissionenvironment,anSDMPEG-2streamrequiresabout3Mbps;theequivalentJPEG2000streamwouldbeabout6Mbps.Similarly,720pHDMPEG-2streamrequiresabout16Mbps;theequivalentJPEG2000streamofthesamevideowouldconsumeabout30Mbps.

Inawirelessenvironment,JPEG2000becomesmuch,muchmoreattractive.BecauseMPEG-2manifestserrorsasveryobviousartifacts,muchmoreforwarderrorcorrection(FEC)isrequired,andmanymorepacketsmayhavetoberetransmitted.FECandretransmissionbothconsumebandwidth,requiringalargeframebufferwithcomplexmemoryandtimingconsiderations.OnceFECistakenintoaccount,thebandwidthrequirementsofJPEG2000maybelessthanorequaltothatofanMPEG-2stream.Also,becausethedecodeisstraightforward,theJPEG2000solutionwillbelessexpensive.Further,retransmissionrequiressignificantamountsofbufferonthereceiver,whichcanbecostlyandwhichincreaseslatency.

UsingJPEG2000hasadditionalbenefitsthatarediscussedbelow.Manyofthebenefitsarerelatedtothescalabilityofthecodestream,which,amongotherthings,allowsdisplaysofdifferentresolutionstodecodeonlytheportionsofthecodestreamstheyneed.

UWBprovidesamplebandwidthforJPEG2000,andallowstheotherbenefitsofJPEG2000toberealized.

Q: Why don’t we just wait for H.264? It’s going to address all of these problems, right?

A:H.264promisesbettercompressionefficiency,buttherearenoadvantagesoverMPEG-2forwirelessapplications.Likeanymotionestimationscheme,anyerrorswillbepropagatedthroughoutseveralframes.

Further,forrecompressioninthehome(caseswherethestreamdidn’toriginateinH.264)theencoderwouldrequiretoomuchspaceandcosttoomuchforanyconsumerproduct.Today,H.264HDencodersareprohibitivelyexpensiveforconsumerelectronicsapplications.

3

Q: Why not just make the wireless environment more robust?

A: Eveninarobustenvironmenterrorswilloccur.Forwarderrorcorrectionisacriticalpartofqualityofservice(QoS),butitconsumesbandwidth.UsinglessbandwidthonFECmeansitcanbeusedelsewhere.

Q: What about security? Is there content protection for JPEG2000?

A: ThesamequestionsapplytoJPEG2000astheydotoMPEG-2orH.264,oranyothercompressedvideo.Itisverypossibletoapplyacontentprotectionscheme,suchasHDCPorAES128,toacompressedstream.Sincetheinputtoallvideocompressioncodecsisuncompressedvideo,thecontentprotectionmustbeappliedaftercompression,notbefore.Atthepresenttime,manywirelesschipvendorsuseAES128.Recently,SandiaNationalLabsused256-bitAESencryptiontosecurereal-timelive-streamingvideoimagesoverawirelessUWBlinkformilitaryapplications.

SomefeaturesofJPEG2000maymakeiteasiertoapplyexistingencryptionmethods.ThefixedoutputbitrateofJPEG2000shouldmakeiteasiertoimplementhandshakingandothertiming-criticalelementsofcontentprotection.Theintraframe-onlycompressionmayalsoeasesystemdesignrequirements.

Q: How do UWB and JPEG2000 enable wireless HD gaming? Why can’t MPEG-2 be used?

A: Thevideofromagamingconsolemustbecompressedinrealtimebeforebeingwirelesslytransmitted.JPEG2000providesbetterimagequalitythanMPEG-2forreal-timecompressionofeitherSDorHDatthepricepointsofinterest.

Real-timecompressionisnotthesamethingaslowlatency.Becauseitmustwaitforseveralcompressedframestodisplayasingledecompressedframe,MPEG-2hashighlatency.LatencyandbandwidthcanbetradedbygoingtoI-frameonly,but,asdiscussedearlier,thisisanexpensive,complexpropositionevenforSD;recallthatreal-timeHDMPEG-2encodersarethousandsofdollars.

ThelatencyofaJPEG2000streamisaboutoneframeforencodeandoneframefordecode.ThetotallatencyoftheHDgameshownatCES2006,usingAnalogDevices’ADV202andPulse~LINK’sCWave™UWBtechnology,islessthan200ms—theusercan’ttellthatit’sawirelessvideolink.

Q: What is meant by “scalable” quality and resolution?

A: Forquality,scalabilitymeansthatthecompressedcodestreamisorganizedsothatdifferentqualitylevelscanbeextractedwithoutdecompression.JPEG2000willproducethebestpossibleimagefortheavailablebandwidth.Ifthechannelis50Mbps,JPEG2000producesthebestpossibleimagequalityfor50Mbps.Ifthebandwidthdropsto25Mbps,JPEG2000willautomaticallyproducethebestpossibleimagequalityfor25Mbps.Becauseit’sintraframe-onlycompression,theoutputbitratecanbeinstantaneouslyadjustedtomatchchannelconditions.

Qualityscalabilityalsomeansthatportionsofthecodestreamcanbeselectivelyprotected.LikeMPEG-2,theheaderoftheJPEG2000codestreamisthemostimportantsectionanderrorstothissectioncanbemitigatedusingFEC.UnlikeMPEG-2though,somesectionsoftheJPEG2000streamaremoreimportantthanothersandFECcanbeappliedonlytothosesections.Ifthesectionofthepacketcontainingveryhighdetailislostordamaged,theimagewillnotsufferasmuchasifthelowfrequencyportionisdisrupted.Becauseofthis,JPEG2000makesmoreefficientuseofFECbandwidththandoesMPEG-2.

Forresolution,scalabilitymeansthatthecompressedcodestreamisorganizedsothatdifferentresolutionlevels(imagesizes)canbeextractedwithoutdecompression.Anyreceivercandecodejusttheportionofthecodestreamitrequires,allowingittodisplayitsnativeresolution.ThesameJPEG2000codestreamcouldbebroadcasttoanHDTV,anSDTV,adisplayinaremotecontrol,oraPDAwithidealresults.Fortemporalschemesthisisnotpossible;thehighestresolutionmustbedecodedbyeachdevicebefore,whichcouldbeveryexpensiveforHDtemporaldecoders.

Analog Devices, Inc.Worldwide HeadquartersAnalogDevices,Inc.OneTechnologyWayP.O.Box9106Norwood,MA02062-9106U.S.A.Tel:781.329.4700(800.262.5643,U.S.A.only)Fax:781.461.3113

Analog Devices, Inc. Europe HeadquartersAnalogDevicesSA17-19rueGeorgesBesseAntony,92160FranceTel:33.1.46.74.45.00Fax:33.1.46.74.45.01

Analog Devices, Inc. Japan HeadquartersAnalogDevices,KKNewPierTakeshibaSouthTowerBuilding1-16-1Kaigan,Minato-ku,Tokyo,105-6891JapanTel:813.5402.8200Fax:813.5402.1064

Analog Devices, Inc. Southeast Asia HeadquartersAnalogDevices22/FOneCorporateAvenue222HuBinRoadShanghai,200021ChinaTel:86.21.5150.3000Fax:86.21.5150.3222

©2006 Analog Devices, Inc. All rights reserved. Trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners.Printed in the U.S.A. PH05920-0-2/06 www.analog.com

AnalogDevicescurrentlyofferstheADV202,aJPEG2000-compliantcodec.MoreinformationontheADV202isavailableat:ftp.analog.com/pub/Digital_Imaging/ADV202_FTP_site_contents_3.html.

Formoreinformation,pleasecontact:BrookeCrossley,HighSpeedConvertersMarketingManagerPhone:336.605.4308Email:brooke.crossley@analog.com

Resolution Scalability

JPEG2000 COMPRESSION

HDTV

SDTV

PDA

Cell Phone