Joint ATS-WASC Accreditation Reviews Please join the audio portion of this training: 1-866-854-6779 Access code *1912504*

Joint ATS-WASC Accreditation Reviews

Please join the audio portion of this training:

1-866-854-6779 Access code *1912504*

2

Announcements

This presentation and the accompanying materials are available for download from: http://www.wascsenior.org/ats2009

For assistance with Voice and Web connections please contact:

Genesys Help Desk, 1-866-436-3797 (press option 2)

Please mute your microphone if you are not speaking

3

Value of ATS-WASC Reviews

• Enriches the experience for the institution

• Brings more points of view to the evaluation of the institution

• Reduces duplicative work of preparing reports for and conducting two reviews

4

General Responsibilities

• Sharing information, reports, and actions on institutions

• Providing orientation to participating institutions and teams

• Coordinating actions• Staffing teams collaboratively• Planning visits collaboratively• Conducting visits and preparing reports together

Protocol for the Conductof Joint VisitsWASC & ATS

* ATS Protocol

6

General Principles of the Joint Protocol

• To facilitate the process of accreditation for the member institutions

• To guide the process of joint visits involving both accrediting agencies

7

Responsibilities of the WASC and ATS Staff

• Orientation of ATS/WASC Chairs• Coordination of team recommendations and

respective Commission actions• Staffing of visits [two visits: Capacity and

Preparatory Review (CPR) and Educational Effectiveness Review (EER)]– Normally most CPR members also serve, if possible,

on EER team

8

Responsibilities of the WASC and ATS Staff

• Sharing of Documents: No restrictions on sharing of accreditation-related information

• Logistics of Visit Planning: WASC/ATS staffs consult on team composition 12 months

prior to visits WASC/ATS staffs consult 20-24 weeks prior to coordinate WASC staff consult with school on dates and

coordinate with ATS staff Materials for visits sent to each agency and to team members 12

weeks prior

9

Responsibilities ofTeam Members

• Team Co-Chairs (one from each agency)

• Role of ATS Co-Chair: The usual ATS chair duties AND preparation of the ATS supplemental report

• Role of WASC Co-Chair: Responsible for oversight of visit, drafting WASC team report with WASC Assistant Chair, making team recommendation to Commission

10

Development and Constructionof the Team Report

• General Report Coverage: Address standards/criteria of both agencies

• Report Format: Preference for joint reports with ATS supplement that addresses ATS standards that might not be covered in joint report

• Team Recommendations: Consensus desired with respect to recommendations and

monitoring actions Alignment desired as much as possible, but differences may

emerge Note difference about team recommendation to commissions

* CPR Report Template* EER Report Template

11

Development and Constructionof the Team Report

• Finalizing Team Report Commission staffs, team chairs/assistant chairs confer as soon as

possible Drafts to be available ordinarily within two weeks of visit

• Exit Meeting and Confidentiality of Team Recommendations Each agency has different practices and will report findings

appropriately at the exit interview ATS and WASC teams are not required to make the same

recommendation The Commissions of each agency make the final recommendations that

may or may not follow the recommendation of the visiting team

12

More on the WASC Three-Stage Review Process

1. Proposal: Identifies priorities, areas of emphasis, and outcomes. Aligns work with institutional plans and needs.

2. Capacity/Preparatory Review: Focuses on capacity and readiness for educational effectiveness.

3. Educational Effectiveness: Focuses on results of assessment of student learning/quality improvement.

* 3 Stage Process

13

More on the Scope of the Two Reviews

Capacity and Preparatory

• Preparatory as: readiness for the Educational Effectiveness Review

• Capacity as: purposes, integrity, stability, resources, structures, policies, processes

Educational Effectiveness

• Demonstrating student learning• Demonstrating institutional

learning• Demonstrating evidence-based

decision-making

* Expectations for 2 Reviews

14

WASC Expectations about Assessment of Student Learning

CPR• Student learning outcomes

set at program and course level

• SLOs are in syllabi• Faculty has developed

assessment plans• Faculty has set

expectations for student achievement

• Faculty has tools to measure learning (direct and indirect; multiple)

EER• Results of assessment

show extent to which graduates are meeting expected levels of achievement

• Results used to improve student learning

• Results used to improve assessment strategies

* Closing the Loop

15

More on the Team Pre-Visit Preparation and Coordination

• Materials review• Call with the CEO and chairs• Pre-visit conference call

– To meet team members– To identify issues and strategy– To agree on team assignments– To refine visit schedule– To identify needed documents– To plan visit logistics and report

* Pre-Visit Conference Call Worksheet- CPR and EER

16

WASC Standards and CFRs

• Core Commitments: Capacity and EE• Standards: Broad, holistic, encompassing• Criteria for Review: Provide specificity and

meaning• Guidelines: Ways to demonstrate compliance

with CFRs

* Alignment of ATS and WASC Standards

17

Team Use of the Standards and CFRs

• Team judgments must be linked to specific Standards and CFRs

• CFRs must be cited in reports • Standards and CFRs form the basis for

Commission decisions• Standards and CFRs provide a context for

continuous quality improvement

WASC Standards at a Glance

* Standards at a Glance* WASC Standards

STANDARD 1:Defining Institutional Purposes and Ensuring Educational Objectives

Institutional PurposesIntegrity

STANDARD 2:Achieving Educational Objectives

Through Core Functions

Teaching and LearningScholarship and Creativity

Support for Student Learning

STANDARD 3: Developing and Applying Resources and

Organizational Structures to Ensure Sustainability

Faculty and StaffFiscal, Physical, and Information Resources

Organizational Structures and Decision-Making Processes

STANDARD 4: Creating an Organization Committed

to Learning and Improvement

Strategic Thinking and Planning Commitment to Learning and

Improvement

What’s New on WASC Visits in 2009-10

24

New on WASC Visits, 2009-10• Systematic review and reporting of off-campus sites

and distance education programs• Team rating of institution on Framework for Evaluating

Educational Effectiveness (pilot) • Compliance audits for new and sanctioned institutions• Revisions to CFRs adopted in 2008 • Coverage of student success on both reviews• Coverage of program review at EER stage

25

WASC Tools for Teams: Rubrics for

Assessment of Student Learning • Academic Program Learning Outcomes• Use of Portfolios in Assessing Program

Outcomes• Use of Capstones in Assessing Program

Outcomes• Integration of Student Learning Assessment

into Program Review

* Rubrics: Capstone, PLO, Program Review, Portfolio

26

Expected Examples of Evidence of Assessment

• Retention and graduation data/disaggregated and analyzed

• Standardized test results/licensing exams• Faculty assessments

– Grades– Portfolios, capstones and work samples

• Surveys and standardized interviews

27

Using the WASC EE Framework

• Identify where the institution fits on the framework for each line

• Use results to determine where the institution is in its evolution toward being a highly developed learning organization

• Use language of the framework in the report to guide the Commission and the institution

* Educational Effectiveness Framework

28

Using Evidence in Team Reports

• Use qualitative and quantitative evidence • Select evidence carefully and purposefully• Connect evidence to an assertion or question • Analyze information; do not just put forth data• Let evidence suggest improvements• Use evidence that speaks to the institution’s themes and

the team's questions• Address results/findings of assessment, not just process

29

Thank You!

This presentation and the accompanying materials are available for download from:

http://www.wascsenior.org/ats2009