ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC) Interim Design Review Thermal Structural FEA of Feeders A Brooks July 27, 2010 July 26-28, 20101ITER_D_353BL2.

Post on 13-Dec-2015

212 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

ITER In-Vessel Coils (IVC)Interim Design Review

Thermal Structural FEA of Feeders

A Brooks

July 27, 2010

July 26-28, 2010 1ITER_D_353BL2

Middle and Lower ELM FeedersAnalysis Status Overview

• Geometry

• Modeling & Meshing– Feeders

– Background Field Coils

• Material Properties

• Boundary Conditions– Temperature

– Implied Structural Supports

• Loading– Ohmic Heating

– Nuclear Heating

– Lorentz Forces

– Water Pressure

• Preliminary Results

• Stress Allowables and Acceptance Criteria (TBD)

• Ongoing Analyses

• Issues and Resolution Plan

2ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Feeder Geometry

Modeling Interface is up to but not including Couplings

CATIA Model Exported as Step File and Imported into ProE3ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Modeling• Modeling used section data and sweeping curves from

CAD Model to create mesh using FORTRAN Codes

4ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

PF and TF Field Drivers

• PF Coils Modeled Explicitly in ANSYS• TF Coil uses 1/R from Center Filament to Provide

5.3T at 6.2m

OH/PF Coil Geometry and CurrentsCoil Rc Zc Dr Dz MA-TurnsOH1 1.688 5.071 0.749 1.979 4.03OH2 1.688 3.043 0.749 1.979 -10.98OH3 1.688 1.014 0.749 1.979 -18.11OH4 1.688 -1.014 0.749 1.979 -18.24OH5 1.688 -3.043 0.749 1.979 -8.99OH6 1.688 -5.071 0.749 1.979 5.94PF1 3.954 7.557 0.968 0.976 5.07PF2 8.309 6.53 0.649 0.595 -2.22PF3 11.935 3.265 0.708 1.125 -6.23PF4 11.905 -2.243 0.649 1.125 -5.05PF5 8.395 -6.73 0.82 0.945 -7.39PF6 4.287 -7.557 1.633 0.976 17.67

Initial Scenario Data UsedOther Scenarios need to be considered

5ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Material Properties

• Preliminary Analysis – Using Linear Properties

Material Properties (at 100C for linear checkout) CuCRZr MgO SS

Electrical Resitivity rsvx 1 2.71E-08 2.71E+01 7.70E-07 Ohm-mRelative Permeablity murx 1 1 1 1Elastic Modulus ex 1 1.25E+11 3.00E+11 1.93E+11 MpaPoisson's Ratio nuxy 1 0.3 0.3 0.3Thermal Expansion Coef alpx 1 1.71E-05 1.28E-05 1.65E-05 m/m-CDensity dens 1 8854 2200 7899 kg/m3Thermal Conductivity kxx 1 333 2.36 15.48 w/m-CHeat Capacitance c 1 383 940 513 J/kg-C

6ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Boundary Conditions• Preminary Analyses Assumed MgO bonded to Cu Tube and

SS Sheath– Impact of debonding to be addressed using low shear modulus

• Supports not modeled explicidly, constraints added at support locations– Initial runs assumed tee fully bonded to VV structurally but isolated

thermally (conservative?)

– Tube Ends Fully Constrained at Couplings (assumes support will exist)

• Only Cooling from Water Tubes– ID held at fixed temperature: 100C at inlet, 130 at outlet

– Radiation from outer surfaces to VV and surroundings not included

– Conduction cooling to VV ignored

7ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Loading

• Ohmic Heating 15 kA DC Current in Cu– Directions chosen to induce worse moments of Tee

Section – Top Turns in one direction, bottom opposite

– Note: Since Temperature is constrained at ID (perfect cooling) Ohmic heating has only small effect on Cu transverse temperature gradients.

• Nuclear Heating assumes 1.4 MW/m2 at Plasma facing surface and decays as e-x/where cm

• Lorentz Forces from 15kA crossed with local field from OH/PF and TF (see plots)

• 4.4 MPa (638psi) Water Pressure in Tubes

8ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Applied Nuclear Heating Heat Generation Rates

9ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Resulting Steady State Temperatures

10ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Mid Section of Feeders

Resulting Steady State Temperaturesat ends of Feeder Tees

ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 11

With Cold Inlet Water in Bottom Turn, Hot Spot is on TopWith Cold Inlet Water in Top Turn, Hot Spot is on Bottom

Water Pressure in Tubes

12ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Toroidal Field

13ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

1/R Field plusself field fromfeeders

Vertical Field

14ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Without Plasma With Plasma

Initial Results ignoredplasma field, but for outboard componentsvertical field is increased

Radial Field

15ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Without Plasma With Plasma

As is radial field

Global Von Mises Stresses

16ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Global Displacements

ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 17

ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 18

EM Thermal

EM vs Thermal Loads Impact onVon Mises Stress

View from Back

ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 19

EM Thermal

EM vs Thermal Loads Impact onDisplacements

Von Mises Stress at Mid Section

20ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Temperature GradientBetween base and VVAnd assumption of fixedSupport causes large stress

Von Mises Stress at Lower End Section

21ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

Local stress concentrationat weld

Von Mises Stress in Tubes at Mid ELM

22ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

High Outer fiber stressFrom bending of Unsupported tube

Von Mises Stress at Mid Section with Perfect Thermal Contact to VV

ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 23

Stress in SS base drops significantly278=>150 MPa

ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 24

Von Mises Stress at Lower Section with Perfect Thermal Contact to VV

Local stress concentrationat weld stillpersists

Von Mises Stress at Lower Section with Perfect Thermal Contact to VV

ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 25

Only minor change inOuter fiber stressFrom bending of Unsupported tube

Stress Allowables and Acceptance Criteria

• Need to ensure compliance with Appendix D of the In-Vessel Component Criteria specifies the Stress Acceptance Criteria. Not there yet for

unsupported tubes and welds. MgO TBD

ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 26

Calculated Stress in Fully SupportedSection (left)

Sm Endurance Limit (No Defects)

Conductor, Intermediate Strength CuCrZr

74 MPa 133 MPa 96 MPa

Conduit, 316LN 131 MPa 147 MPa 196 MPa

Support, 316LN 150 MPa 147 MPa 196 Mpa

MgO 163 MPa ?? ??

Ongoing Analyses

• Alternate Support Concepts need to be evaluated to reduce stresses– For Tee

– For Tubes

• Additional Load Cases need to be identified and run– Normal Operating Scenarios

– Disruption Scenarios

– Transient Response

• Characterization of MgO, which is in progress, needs to be folded into analyses– Material Properties

– Interface behavior with Cu Tube and SS Casing

ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010 27

Issues and Resolution Plan

Issue Resolution Pre/Post October

High Stresses in unsupported region of tubes

Design will need to provide additional supports while not over constraining and restrict thermal expansion

Pre

High Stresses in Welds Refine modeling and/or increase weld section. Solving above support of tubes may also relieve local stress

Pre

High Stresses in Base Support if poor thermal connection to VV while rigidly held

Need to ensure supports to VV provide adequate heat sinking.

Pre

Uncertainty in MgO properties and behavior

Characterization of MgO from testing underway needs to be folded into analysis

Pre?

28ITER IVC IDR 26-28 July 2010

top related