ISD Directors/OSE Leadership Meeting

ISD Directors/OSE Leadership Meeting

March 19, 2013Greater Lansing Association of Realtors

Welcome & IntroductionsAgenda Review

Rugg Dozzi

State and Federal ForecastsAsked & Answered

Eleanor White

OSE Updates

• Priority Schools moving to the EAAEAA Update

• Monitoring and Technical Assistance Team…name change from CIMS Team

Performance Reporting

Jessica BradyOren Christmas

Julie Trevino

State Performance Plan Improvement Activities

• OSEP’s New DirectionResults Driven Accountability (RDA)

Increased attention to all indicators

Expanding improvement activities

• OSE’s New DirectionStudent centered

More results driven

Impact several indicators

Useable to the field

State Performance Plan Improvement Activities

• TimelinesDecember 2013 - Review & revise

January 2014 - Added to the SPP/APR

January 2015 – Results reported in APR

State Performance Plan Improvement Activities

Public Reporting

• Mid-May District Preview PeriodIs currently being developed

Will reside on the MI School Data Portal

Will have the look and feel of the Data Portraits

May 29th Public Reports goes live

Monitoring & Technical Assistance

Jessica Brady

General Supervision Monitoring (GSM)

• Pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 2004, §§300.600 and 300.149(a)(1)(2), and the Michigan Administrative Rules for Special Education (MARSE), R 340.1839, the Office of Special Education (OSE) must ensure the educational programs for students with disabilities are administered in accordance with federal and state standards.

• Conduct cyclical reviews of locals within each of the 56 Intermediate School Districts.

• Collaborate with other OSE units: Finance, Program Accountability, Performance Reporting.

General Supervision Monitoring GOALS

• Random selection of 1-2 locals from each ISD• From the district list

Eliminate locals that are being monitored in the current cycle

Select from locals that have not had a previous monitoring activity

If none remain, select from locals that have not had a monitoring activity in the past 4 years

If none remain, select randomly.

General Supervision Monitoring SELECTION CRITERIA

Rotation #1 - 2015/2016 Rotation #2 - 2013/2014 Rotation #3 -2014/2015

Fall Allegan Lapeer Livingston Ottawa Lewis Cass Marquette-Alger Clinton Co. Macomb Mecosta-Osceola Delta-Schoolcraft Char-Emmet Menominee Eastern UP Muskegon Shiawassee Traverse Bay Area Westshore Wayne Gratiot-Isabella

Winter Kalamazoo Saginaw Clare-Gladwin Kent St. Clair COOR Lenawee Sanilac Iosco Manistee Tuscola Bay-Arenac Monroe Van Buren Barry Montcalm COP Branch Ingham

Spring Oakland AMA Dickinson-Iron Midland Berrien Eaton St. Joseph Calhoun Genesee Washtenaw Copper Country Hillsdale Wexford-Missaukee Gogebic-Ontonagon Ionia Newaygo Huron Jackson

CIMS Coordinator and ISD Monitor

• ISD Monitor’s may be CIMS Coordinator’s for their ISD and any local in the district.

• Best practice is for the CIMS Coordinator in a local to be an employee of the local district.

• CIMS Coordinator’s who are not ISD Monitor’s receive technical assistance from the ISD Monitor.

B-7 (Preschool Skills)

• Starting with the April 15 workbook in the Continuous Improvement Monitoring System Results Transmittals will be issued for B-7

• A local will receive a Results Transmittals if the district did not reach the target for any of the subparts of Indicator 7

B-7 Continued

• April 18, 2013- data workshop in Escanaba- register online at www.eotta.ccresa.org/

• There are trainings on Child Outcomes being held throughout the State. Register online at www.eotta.ccresa.org/

B-12 (Early Childhood Transition)

• Data for this indicator was previously submitted in MiCIS

• Is currently submitted in MSDS (first year)

• If there are data issues/problems, they will be handled as they arise

Side-By-SidePart C/Part B

Teri Johnson

Program Finance

John Andrejack

Approp. Done Approp. In Progress Approp. Not Started

1st Sequester 2nd Sequester 3rd Sequester

Federal Appropriation 7/1/12 (10/1/12 7/1/13) (10/1/13 7/1/14) (10/1/14 _________________________________________________________________________________________________

Federal Award (7/1/12 10/1/12) (7/1/13 10/1/13) (7/1/14 10/1/14)

Not Impacted Impacted

SEQUESTRATION March 19, 2013

TA/PD System Design

Teri Johnson

Key Principles for ESEA

• College and Career Ready expectations

• State developed systems of differentiated recognition, accountability and support

• Support effective instruction and leadership

• Reduce duplication

What’s TA and PD?

Professional Development (PD)

• Introduces new skills• Focuses on specific

learning (particular approach, piece of software, etc.)

• More standardized approach

Technical Assistance (TA)

• Supports the implementation of new skills

• Broad in nature• Accounts for variability

within a system• Customized to meet the

needs of the consumer

Multi-Tiered Approach to TA & PD

Intensive

Targeted

Universal

A New Standard

Compliance

• Obedience• Agreement• Conformity• Accordance• Submission

Results

• Outcomes• Grades• Marks• Consequences• Scores

The Future of Improvement Activities

• College and Career Ready is the ultimate goal for ALL students.

• Providing meaningful results in light of proven and effective strategies is essential to improving student achievement.

• Utilizing the SPP as a resource to assist districts in their work to improve outcomes for students with disabilities is a NEW focus of our work.

“IT IS BETTER TO TAKE MANY SMALL STEPS IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION THAN TO MAKE A GREAT LEAP FORWARD ONLY TO STUMBLE BACKWARD.” ― LOUIS SACHAR

Closing thoughts…

Program Accountability

Sheryl Diamond

Updates

• Current rule package

• Public posting of state complaints

• New complaint procedure

• ISD Plan workgroup status

MI School Data Portal

Paul Bielawski

Parking LotHot Topics

Rugg Dozzi

Reminders/Forecasts

• Electronic Evaluation for today• Next Meeting:

•May 15, 2013LCC West Campus5708 Cornerstone Dr.Lansing, MI 48917