IPSC - Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen Ispra - Italy Joint.
Post on 16-Jan-2016
217 Views
Preview:
Transcript
IPSC - Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen
Ispra - Italy
http://ipsc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
https://datacollection.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
Joint Research Centre (JRC)
CHALLENGES IN CHALLENGES IN ASSEMBLING FISHERIES DATAASSEMBLING FISHERIES DATA
9th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010 1
Anna Cheilari
29th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Background
Commission Regulation (EC) No. 665/2008 establishes the Data Collection Framework (DCF), a Community framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector and support for scientific advice regarding the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP). This regulation succeeds the old DCR
Under this regulation the European Commission requires Member States to collect data on Biological and Economic aspects of many European fisheries and related fisheries sectors
39th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Background
DG MARE - JRC Administrative arrangementSUPPORT THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DATA
COLLECTION FRAMEWORK (DCF)
Maintaining and developing the dedicated DCF web-site https://datacollection.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
Supporting demands of data launched by DG MARE Developing quality assurance aspects of the data
submitted by Member States
49th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Background
Year Economic Discard Biological Fishing Effort
2006 5 1
2007 2 2
2008 2 1 2 1
2009 2* 2 2
2010 2* 2 1
* One call is for the EU fishing fleet, the other for the EU processing sector
Data calls
59th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Official letters
Framework
69th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Upload facilitieshttps://datacollection.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
Access is restricted to Member States
LoginPassword
Framework
79th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Framework
Data base The uploaded national data is stored in
a Postgres database The database allows for data
processing in SQL To support non-experienced users a
number of queries (data tables) are produced
By distributing user names and passwords these could be downloaded by our collaborators in DG MARE in an easy manner
89th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Use of data
Framework
JRC collects and maintains fisheries management data transmitted by EU MS
The resulting datasets are assessed by teams of independent experts participating in working groups convened by STECF
The resulting scientific advice is used to inform the CFP decision making process
99th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Reports
Framework
109th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Economic data collection
Parameters for fleet economic data calls:Capacity: Number of vessels, number of enterprises,
length, GT, kW, age.Employment: Engaged crew, FTEsEffort: Days at sea, energy consumptionLandings: Value, volume, priceOther income: Income from fishing rights, direct
subsidies, non fishing incomeExpenditure: Crew wages, energy costs, repairs,
variable & non-variable costs, rental of fishing rights, depreciation
Capital and Investments: Vessel value, fishing rights value, in-year investments, financial position
119th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Economic data collection
Segmentation for fleet economic data calls:
Fishing gears: Beam trawl, demersal trawl, pelagic trawl, dredgers, purse seiners, pots and traps, gears using hooks, drift and fixed nets etc
Length categories: 0-10m, 10m-12m, 12m-18m, 18m-24m, 24m-40m, over 40m (0-6m and 6-12m in Mediterranean and Black seas)
Supra regions: 1. Baltic Sea, North Sea, Eastern Arctic, North Atlantic. 2. Mediterranean and Black Seas. 3. Other fishing regions
129th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Fishing effort data collection
STECF “EFFORT DATA” Data base Since 2003 DG MARE calls:- fleet specific catch data including discards- fleet specific nominal effort data- spatial fleet specific effective effort data
• The data have not been called through the European DCR/DCF (JRC) as the aggregation level is inconsistent with official regulations
• Data were called to be delivered to DG Mare directly and Mr. Raetz personally
139th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Fishing effort data collection
STECF “EFFORT DATA” Data base- fleet specific catch data including discards: Landings, discards and biological data (160 parameters, age composition, mean length and weight at age) by species, by year (2003-2008), by quarter area (all ICES divisions, no Black and Mediterranean Seas), by gear, by mesh size (where applicable), by fishery and special management condition (where applicable), 630,000 records- fleet specific nominal effort data: kW*days at sea, GT*days at sea and number of vessel by year (2000-2008), by quarter area (all ICES divisions, no Black and Mediterranean Seas), by gear, by mesh size (where applicable), by fishery and special management condition (where applicable), 80,000 records- spatial fleet specific effective effort data: fished hours by statistical rectangle (30*30 nm), by year (2000-2008), by quarter area (all ICES divisions, no Black and Mediterranean Seas), by gear, by mesh size (where applicable), by fishery and special management condition (where applicable) , 220,000 records
149th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Mediterranean data collection
Mediterranean Data dase• European Community is expected to establish long-
term management plans (LTMP) for relevant Mediterranean demersal and small pelagic fisheries and stocks
• Stocks and fisheries in the Mediterranean are evaluated both at national and GFCM level; these evaluations are often not recurring, are spatially restricted
• Commission has given mandate to STECF to adopt an operational work-programme with a view to update the status of the main stocks and evaluate the exploitation levels
159th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Mediterranean data collection
Datai) Fisheries data (2002-2010)
Biological (landings, length & age distribution, maturity data by age and length, sex ratio by age and length, discards & discards length distribution)Effort (days, KW days, GT days)
ii) Survey dataDemersal species (MEDITS) (1994-2010)Small pelagic species (hydroacoustic) (1990-2010)
iii) Economic data (capacity, employment, income, expenditure, capital and investment, effort and landings) (2002-2008 mandatory, 2009 if available)
169th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Mediterranean data collection
Species: • European hake• Red mullet• Striped red mullet• Picarel• Deep-sea rose shrimp• Red shrimp• Giant red shrimp• Norway lobster• Anchovy• Sardine • + additional species
7 countries
AreaGFCM GSAs
179th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Mediterranean data collection
Variable Group Variables Biological & Transversal Data
Landings Number Weight Length distribution Age distribution
Maturity ogive At length At age
Growth parameters Von Bertalanffy growth parameters
Length-weight relationship parameters
Spawning period Spawning peak
Sex ratio At length At age
Discards Length distribution Age distribution
Effort Days KW Days GT Days
Survey Data MEDITS TA file TB file TC file TD file TT file
Small pelagic Length distribution Age distribution Maturity at age
Table 1: Biological and transversal variables (2002-2009) and data from surveys (1994-2010) requested
189th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Mediterranean data collection
Variable Group Variables
2002-2007 (DCR) data 2008-2009 (DCF) data
Capacity Number of vessels Total GT Total kW Average age
Number of vessels Mean length Mean GT Mean kW Mean age
Employment Total Full-time Part-time FTEs
Number of engaged crew
Income Income Value of landings Income from fishing rights Direct subsidies Other income
Expenditure Crew cost Fuel cost Operational costs Capital cost Repair and maintenance
costs Fixed cost
Crew wages Value of unpaid labour Energy costs Repair costs Variable costs Non variable costs Rental from fishing rights Depreciation
Capital and Investments Borrowing Investment
Vessel replacement value Value of fishing rights In-year investments Financial position
Effort Fuel consumption Days at Sea Fishing days Energy Consumption Number of trips Number of pots and traps
Landings Price per species Weight of landings per species
Value of landings per species
Price per species
Table 2: Economic and transversal variables (2002-2008) requested
199th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Mediterranean data collection
OutcomeData are used by the experts of the SGMED
working group for the assessment of the Mediterranean stocks during the various meetings since 2008
SGMED in 2009 updated the status of 59 stocks, for 18 stocks scientific advice was provided and gave recommendations regarding fisheries management reference points for some species
209th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Mediterranean data collection
ProblemsLate delivery of the data call and the datasets
JRC was not able to properly check the contents and the quality of the data provided
Member states did not strictly follow the instructions, increase demand for uploading support by the JRC team
Until 2009 data were stored locally in the SGMED ftp server, in Microsoft access. No automatisms for the first quality check of the uploaded data
219th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Regulations
Quality
229th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Mediterranean data call
Results…Some national data deliveries hardly met minimum standards requested in the data call regarding deadlines, inconsistent codification and units of data
239th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Mediterranean data call
Tablename CYPRUS SPAIN FRANCE GREECE ITALY MALTA SLOVENIA0 MED_01_LAN X1 MED_02_EFF X X2 MED_03_LAN_LEN X X3 MED_04_LAN_AGE X X4 MED_05_MAT_LEN X X5 MED_06_MAT_AGE X X6 MED_07_GRO X X7 MED_08_SEX_LEN X X8 MED_09_SEX_AGE X X9 MED_10_DIS X X10 MED_11_DIS_LEN X11 MED_12_DIS_AGE12 MED_13_TA X X13 MED_14_TB14 MED_15_TC15 MED_16_TD X16 MED_17_TT X17 MED_18_SP_LEN X18 MED_19_SP_AGE X19 MED_20_SP_MAT20 MED_21_CAPACITY X X X21 MED_22_EMPLOYMENT X X X22 MED_23_INCOME X X X23 MED_24_EXPENDITURE X X24 MED_25_CAPINVEST X X X25 MED_26_EFFORT X X X26 MED_27_LANDINGS X X
Overview of the current data upload (deadline: 22/05)
249th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Discussion
Challenges
• JRC serves 4 different categories of data calls• Data calls and variables can change from year to
year• Since 2010, DCF is implemented• Huge amount of data (i.e., survey data for ≈16000
hauls, ≈ 1435000 records of length)• For the first time, possibility for JRC to keep the
data, no obligation for deletion after 20 days
259th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Discussion
How MS hold data
• According to the regulations Member states shall ensure that primary data collected under national programmes are safely stored in computerised databases(i.e. Greek db more than 100 different tables, >70000000 records)
• No regional databases exist• No common software platform• No common codifications• Experts come to the meetings with their own data
269th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Discussion
What users think of the process
• The reply is country specific• We are trying to create a baseline, datasets with
common codifications, aggregation levels for analysis and comparisons
• Quality remains an issue• Experts come to the meetings with their own data• When experts are involved of the collection and
submission of data the quality of data is improved• It can be frustrating!!!
279th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
Discussion
Improvements
Regarding the biological data, implementation of strict rules regarding the upload and codification of data
Implementation of automatisms for the first quality check of the uploaded data
No acceptance of data through other means (i.e. emails)
289th Meeting of Marine Observation and Data Expert Group, Copenhagen, 26 May 2010
We hope we are moving to the right direction
Thank you for your attention
top related