IEP ProIEP Project Phoenix Haitiject Phoenix Haiti
Post on 22-Apr-2017
226 Views
Preview:
Transcript
International Electric Power
Project Phoenix Waste-to-Energy Project
Haiti
AND
IEP-Morgan Stanley
Caribbean Renewable Energy Investment Initiative
PLATTS JANUARY 2013
Project Phoenix • Earthquake Effects • Mutual Goals • Current Conditions in Haiti’s Waste and Energy Sectors • Project Phoenix Solution • Major Benefits • Lessons learned
IEP and Morgan Stanley Caribbean Initiative • Caribbean Overview • $1 Billion Investment Capital • Situational Assessment • Offer and Conditions
Topics
2
• On January 12th, 2010 Haiti experienced a catastrophic magnitude 7.0 earthquake with its epicenter 16 miles west of Port-au-Prince.
• Over 50 aftershocks measuring 4.5 in magnitude or greater were recorded in the following weeks.
• Resulting in more than $7.8 billion in damage, or 120% of the country’s GDP.
• 250,000 residences and 30,000 commercial buildings were either destroyed or severely damaged.
3
People Affected by the Earthquake
Deaths 300,000
Injuries 300,000
Left Homeless 1,000,000+
Project Phoenix Earthquake Effects
Produce cost effective and efficient electricity Effectively use the indigenous fuels of the country Provide clean and sanitary conditions to promote economic and social growth Implement Project Phoenix over 2 years PPV between IEP and GOH - MSA and PPA signed on March 31, 2012
4
Project Phoenix Mutual Goals
5
• Haiti is short at least 500 MW • 235 MW of installed capacity, but
only 110 MW available • Average tariffs of $0.34 per kWh • 90% derived from oil-fired plants
10% from one hydro facility • 100-200 MW planned over next 5 years • Unconnected T&D system; captures
only 25-35% of usage fees • Over use small generators due to lack of
dependable dispatch • EDH runs at a significant annual deficit • Sovereign guarantees not available
Project Phoenix Current Conditions in Energy
6
• Approximately 2,000 tons of MSW produced daily in greater Port-au-Prince
• Approximately 1,000 tons collected daily – SMCRS – 600 -700 tons – Private Collectors – 300-400 tons
• Truitier Landfill is unlined and unregulated; supporting 700 families
• Storm events fill canals, waterways and discharge into the sea
• Uncollected waste contributes to spread of disease
• SMCRS is under capitalized and fraught with maintenance issues; over 1,000 employees have tested positive for tuberculosis and other respiratory illness
Project Phoenix Current Conditions in Waste
7
Lignite Mining and Transportation – Lignite from the Central Plateau is used as a supplemental fuel, creating a new industry.
Waste Collection and Processing – Robust collection and processing of MSW uses the latest technology and leaves neighborhoods clean of refuse, reducing infections and disease.
Energy Generation – State-of-the-art WTE technology generates electricity in a safe, environmentally-friendly manner at costs well below fossil fuel plants in Haiti.
Project Phoenix Solution
X Design was revised to remove lignite and operate with 100% MSW. Output was reduced from 50MW to 30MW
• Monte Carlo analysis performed on the most current and reputable waste characterization studies – support a plant size of 16 -55 MW depending on the fuel composition.
• Variables include: • Waste quantities generated daily • Inclusion of plastic as fuel • Moisture content • Plant design and efficiency
Project Phoenix Understanding Waste as a Fuel Source
9
Project Phoenix Integrated WTE Solution
• $250 Million • 30MW WTE Integrated Facility • 15KM north of Port-au-Prince on 400 acres • Expandable as population grows • 120 waste collection vehicles, 5 transfer
stations and 15,000 bins and containers • 4 processing lines able to sort 100% of MSW
removing varying degrees of recyclables • 60 acre landfill for ash and hazardous material • Organics pre-treated to improve boiler
performance • Plastics can be used as fuel or recycled to
produce value-add products • Can be modified for sanitary sludge and tires • Comprehensive Environmental Controls • Seawater Cooling
10
• 1,600 direct jobs • PPA price - $0.17/kWh • Reduces dependency on oil imports • Reduces carbon footprint • Creates other revenue sources for GOH
– Recyclables – Cement additives – Purified water
• Significantly funds waste system • Cleans streets to encourage investment • Reduces air and water borne pathogens • Facilitates closure of unregulated landfill • Over $50 Million annual revenues/savings for the GOH • Demonstrates ability to attract private capital
Project Phoenix Major Benefits
11
• Multinational Organizations: – Heavily influence investment decisions – Prefer competition even on privately funded projects – Have a strong say - but rarely provide leadership – Takes time to build trust with private sector – Expect you to be aligned to their plans
• Government of Haiti: – Highly motivated to find solutions – Working hard to dispel “business as usual” legacy – Cannot act unilaterally without multilateral concurrence – Does not have the capacity (resources) to evaluate complex transactions
• Private Investor: – Build consensus - but make sure you have a counterparty lead – Assure you have a motivated lead financial partner – Be patient, collaborative, transparent, and have sufficient development resources
Project Phoenix Lessons Learned
12
IEP-Morgan Stanley Caribbean Renewable Energy
Investment Initiative
• Two Energy Categories: – Gas Producers – Trinidad and Tobago – Oil Importers – the rest!
• Two Political Categories: – Independent Entities – former Spanish, French and English colonies – Sovereign Entities - American, Dutch and French
• Energy Costs: – High due to reliance on imported oil
• Renewables: – Windward Island – excellent wind capacity – Leeward Islands – excellent solar capacity – All have varying capacity for biomass, waste-to-energy and small hydro
13
IEP–Morgan Stanley Joint Proposal: Caribbean Overview
IEP–Morgan Stanley Joint Proposal: Caribbean Overview
COUNTRY• Exsiting Generation
EXISTING AND POTENTIAL GENERATION IN THE CARRIBBEAN
Sola
r
Win
d
Biom
ass
WTE
Coal
Gas
Oil Hydr
o
Geot
herm
al
COUNTRY• Exsiting Generation
1 Anguilla •2 Antigua and Barbuda • •3 Aruba •4 Bahamas • •5 Barbados • • •6 British Virgin Islands •7 Cayman Islands •8 Cuba • • • • • •9 Dominica • •
10 Dominican Republic • • • • • • •11 Grenada •12 Guadeloupe • •13 Haiti • •14 Jamaica • • • •15 Martinique • • • •16 Montserrat •17 Puerto Rico • • • •18 St. Kitts and Nevis •19 St. Lucia •20 St. Vincent and the Grenadines • •21 Trinidad and Tobago • •22 Turks and Caicos •23 US Virgin Islands •
IEP–Morgan Stanley Joint Proposal: $1 Billion Investment Capital
15
• IEP and Morgan Stanley have teamed to promote $1 Billion in energy sector investment in Caribbean.
• Projects will consider host country power needs, natural resources, political landscape, and available credit.
• IEP will vet the project to determine the best technology fit and implementation strategy.
• PPV’s will be encouraged when appropriate.
$1Billion Project
Execution
Political & Credit Risk
Availability of
Financing
Natural Resources
& Technology
Viability
Energy Deficit
Current $/kWh Price
16
Suitable Technologies • Coal • Gas (CNG) - Combined and Simple Cycle
• Thermal Gas or Oil • Waste-to-Energy (WTE) - Incineration or Biogas
• Geothermal • Small Hydro • Solar - PV
• Wind - Large and Small Turbines
Currently Unavailable • Nuclear, LNG, and Large Hydro
Countries Evaluated • Haiti • Dominican Republic • St. Lucia • Cayman Islands • Bahamas • St. Kitts & Nevis • Bonaire
Key Organizations • CARICOM • CREDP • CARILEC • OECS
IEP–Morgan Stanley Joint Proposal: Situational Assessment
Ashley
Financing Access to capital pool - $ 1 billion Able to finance 100% of project costs Access to global capital markets Access to credit enhancement programs
and instruments
Value Optimization Speed of execution and closing Financing and tax structuring to improve
returns Accurate revenue projections and stability
through hedging and low-cost financing High-quality, low-cost EPC contracting
Operational Efficiency Experienced low-cost generator Effective use of local resources
Conditions Project size 2 to 25MW
Ability to obtain by December 31, 2013:
1) Signed PPA for 20 years at a fixed off-take price of electricity:
Wind US$ 0.16 to 0.20 / kWh Solar US$ 0.20 to 0.24 / kWh WTE US$ 0.15 to 0.25 / kWh Small hydro US$ 0.16 to 0.26 / kWh Geothermal US$ 0.15 to 0.30 / kWh
2) Land control rights and documents
3) Resource availability study
4) Environmental Impact Assessment
5) Interconnection study
IEP–Morgan Stanley Joint Proposal: Offer and Conditions
INTERNATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER LLC
CONTACT INFORMATION
18
603 Stanwix Street (P): +1-412-567-1491 Gateway Two, Suite 1825 (F): +1-412-567-1501 Pittsburgh, PA 15222, USA (E): info@iepwr.com (W): www.iepwr.com
top related