Transcript
Safe & Equitable Foster Care Reduction in Oregon
ICWA Conference: Reviving Hope Through the Circle October 2009
Safe & Equitable Foster Care Reduction in Oregon
Partnership between:•DHS•OCCF •Tribes•Casey Family Programs
Why?
•Oregon has one of the highest foster care placement rates in the country
•Children placed in foster care are more likely to have poorer outcomes throughout life
•Black and Native children are over-represented in Oregon’s system
•Focusing our efforts to keep children safely in their homes or family networks.
How is Oregon addressing this?• N8V Summit & County Strategic Planning
• Executive leadership commitment
• Child Welfare Equity Taskforce/SB 630
• PSU Decision Point Research
• DHS/CAF Diversity Unit
• OYA / DHS Collaboration
• Model Court/ Courts Catalyzing Change
• Community Engagement & Partnership
Partnership GoalsSix statewide goals to be met by 2011:
1. Safely reduce children in foster care by 20%2. Increase relative placements by 50%3. Reduce children entering care by 10%4. Increase foster care exits by 20%5. Reduce the disproportionality index for Native
and African American children (numerical goal to be set at the end of 2009)
6. Hold the child abuse, neglect rate at or below 7.5%
8 County Sites & N8V Summit Plans
•Tillamook•Multnomah•Washington•Marion•Coos•Deschutes•Malheur•Jackson
•9 – Federally recognized Tribes
•2- Urban native teams
•DHS Central Office team
Child Welfare Equity Task Force“The Task Force shall study the reasons
for, and develop a plan to reduce, the disproportionality of minorities in the child welfare foster care.”
The Task Force may…▫ Collect and analyze data▫ Set specific goals to reduce disproportionality of
minorities in child welfare▫ Study, assess and recommend strategies to
enhance recruitment and retention efforts to increase minority representation
Concerning reduction Staff and Community Partner training Prevention future disparity and disproportionality
Preliminary Statewide Quantitative FindingsSummer/Fall 2009
Study Components
I. Literature Review
II. Analyzing Administrative Data to explore differences in pathways and outcomes for children and families
III. Conducting focus groups to obtain individuals’ perspectives on the differences in pathways and outcomes for children and families
9
8 Major Decision Points10
1. Intake/Reports to CPS
2. Screening
3. Removal
4. Disposition
5. Foster Care Stay
6. Placement
7. Plan
8. Exit
Decision Point Findings
Point 1: Reports to CPS
Do communities report abuse and neglect more for families of color?
American Indian/Alaskan Native families are 2 times more likely to be reported than in Oregon population
Point 2: ScreeningPoint 2: Screening
Are families of color more or less likely to be referred for a full assessment?
American Indian/Alaskan Native families are less likely than other families to be referred for a full assessment
11
Decision Point Findings (cont)Point 3: Removal
Are children of color more likely than White children to be removed from parental care?
Black and American Indian/Alaskan children are more likely than White children to be removed
Decision Point 4: Disposition
Who is most likely to have a ‘founded’ report? (found that abuse or neglect actually did occur)
American Indian/Alaskan Native families are more likely than others to have a report founded
12
Oregon’s Foster Care and General Child Oregon’s Foster Care and General Child Population Comparison Population Comparison
13
Decision Point Findings (cont)Point 5: Length of Stay
How long do children stay in foster care?
• 21% of American Indian/Alaskan Native ICWA-eligible children who exit within one year
▫ 55.2% of American Indian/Alaskan Native ICWA-eligible children exit in two or more years
▫ Of the American Indian/Alaskan Native ICWA-eligible children in foster care, 28.7% are in care more than 4 years
Point 6: Nature of Foster PlacementWhich groups have the highest percentages of children with kinship foster homes?
Of all American Indian/Alaskan Native ICWA-eligible children in foster care, 24.9% are in kinship care
Of all American Indian/Alaskan Native children in foster care, 20.3% are in kinship care
AI/AN – highest percentages of children with kinship foster homes
14
Percentage of Children by Race Percentage of Children by Race Remaining in Foster Care Over 4 YearsRemaining in Foster Care Over 4 Years
15
Decision Point Findings (cont)Point 7: Permanency Plan
Who is most likely to have ‘long-term foster care’ as a plan?
American Indian/Alaskan Native children are the most likely to have a plan of long term foster care
Point 8: Exit Pathway
Which children are more likely to be Adopted?
American Indian/Alaskan Native children have the highest percentage of adoptions .
16
Adapted from Congressional Research Service. August 2005. Race/Ethnicity and Child Welfare.
More likely to come into contact with social service or other workers who notice and report maltreatment
More likely to be in poor, single parent homes – risk factors for maltreatment
Have less access to services that prevent placement and hasten permanency
More likely to be reported and less likely to be reunified due to biased decision making
Children of color
Disproportionality Theories: Research
Moving Toward Equity: 6 “critical levers”
Best & Promising Practices
• Clear data capture and reporting
• Objective CPS assessment process (family strengths-
based)
• Family based decision making / group conferencing
• Family Finding/Relative placements & connections
• System wide, anti-bias training
• Culturally competent practice and services
• Diligent diverse adoption recruitment
Next Steps
“Micro” Practice Principles• Cultural humility: Understand and be humble
about the power you hold. Keep learning from families and from the community.
• Watch out for code words (ex.‘hostile affect’, ‘non-compliant’, etc.). Dig deeper.
• Learn to confront or appeal policies that tend to embed disproportionality (ex. licensing)
• Develop relationships with people who are culturally different from you.
• Work with others to develop a culturally responsive service array
top related