HRD Summit 2016 - Chris Rowlands Presentation

Post on 16-Apr-2017

167 Views

Category:

Documents

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

Who is guilty for the inherent failings in

candidate assessment techniques?

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

“the recruitment process relies on human

decisions...and our decision-making is much more prone to sloppy thinking and bias than

we would like to believe”Jonny GiffordCIPD Research Report: “ A head for hiring”, 2015

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

Bratton & Gold:“Selection is the process by which managers and others use specific instruments to choose from a pool of applicants a person or persons more likely to succeed in the job(s)”

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

Bratton & Gold:“Selection is the process by which managers and others use specific instruments to choose from a pool of applicants a person or persons more likely to succeed in the job(s)”

“Predictive Validity”

or

How well a test actually measures what it intends to measure

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

Is 50%/60%/70% acceptable? Why bridge the gap?

Cost of re-hire (£4k-£10k)

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

Morale

Capacity: impact on team performance

Missed opportunity: cultural and organisational diversity

Customer dissatisfaction

Commercial downtimeHiring managers become risk averse

External perception: candidate pool

“...and our decision-making is much more prone to sloppy thinking and bias than we

would like to believe”

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

“...take a more robust, evidence-based approach. Doing so will help ensure you really are hiring the

best”

“Traditional” recruitment and assessment methods have hard-wired, systematic biases

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

• “Cloning” (specification)

• Gender bias (CV)

• Ethnicity bias (CV)

• Relationship bias (CV & interview)

• Confirmation bias (interview)

• Social desirability bias (interview)

• Status quo bias (decision-making)

• Cognitive load: “strain on your brain” (decision-making)

• DM competence (throughout)

KEY PREDICTORS OF PERFORMANCE

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

Gender/Ethnicity Bias

• Anonymise CVs• Group CVs• Review simultaneously and/or side-by-side• Use objective measures

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

Interviewing

• CHALLENGE = very low “predictive power”• Information gathering rather than decision-making• Suitable design (fit for purpose)• Structured interviews – commit to “job performance” only

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

Testing

• Personality traits ARE predictive of job performance• Work sample testing• “Values”-based measurement / cultural fit

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

Decision-making

• CHALLENGE – Synthesis of complex data• Resolve to stick to what the data/data scoring tells you• Involve people not involved in the Assessment process• Give appropriate time: avoid “decision fatigue” and

commercial pressures

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

Network HR i-intro

• Comparative (anonymised) profiles• Psychometric Profiling

• Aptitudinal Tests e.g. verbal, numerical• Behavioural/Personality Profiling (against Job Profile and/or Company Values)

• Task-based Assessments• Competency-based Q&A• Video Interviewing / Video Profiles• Social Media Profiling• Interview Guidelines, based on Job Specification and Performance Measures• 360 Referencing, based on Performance Measures • Stakeholder forum• Authorisation process for decision-making

CANDIDATE EXPERIENCEAND

CANDIDATE ENGAGEMENT

Chris Rowlands, HR Directors Business Summit 2016

Not forgetting:

top related