How to build SOLID code

Post on 27-Aug-2014

335 Views

Category:

Software

10 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Presentation that introduces that concepts of STUPID code and SOLID code. Also if this two acronyms have been covered multiple times in Software Engineering history that are still sometimes not well known. It is always worth the spread the word!

Transcript

How to build SOLID codeSebastiano (eTr) Merlino

Almost entirely copied from inspired by the presentation “From STUPID to SOLID” by William Durand.

#zenetr

DISCLAIMER:I give you an opinion not rules.

Please, consider these just as principles, not laws!

#zenetr

Only 2 types of code do exist:Your code: Other people code:

It’s REASSURING and you understand it

It INTIMIDATES you and it’s ~99.999% of world’s code

#zenetr

Why should my code be clear?

Because we READ much more than we WRITE

#zenetr

STUPID code, seriously?

#zenetr

What makes code STUPID?● Singleton● Tight Coupling● Untestability● Premature Optimization● Indescriptive Naming (yeah! It’s not misspelled)● Duplication

#zenetr

Singleton#zenetr

Singleton● It represents a GLOBAL STATE in your code● Programs using global state are VERY difficult to test and debug● Programs relying on global state HIDE their dependencies

Links:- Why singletons are controversial?- Why is singleton an antipattern?- So Singletons are bad, then what?

#zenetr

Tight Coupling#zenetr

Tight Coupling● Generalization of the singleton ISSUE● If changing something in a module FORCES you to change also

another module● It makes code difficult to REUSE and also difficult to TEST● To avoid it, favor COMPOSITION over inheritance and try to use

DEPENDENCY INJECTION where possible.

Links:- Reducing Coupling (Martin Fowler)

#zenetr

Untestability#zenetr

Untestability● Testing should not be HARD● Whenever you don’t write UNIT TESTS because you DON’T HAVE

TIME, the real issue is that your code is BAD● Most of the time untestability is caused by TIGHT COUPLING

#zenetr

Premature Optimization#zenetr

Premature OptimizationPREMATURE OPTIMIZATION is the root of all evil - DONALD KNUTH● Do not OVER-COMPLICATE your system in order to optimize it● There is only COST and no BENEFIT● MEASURE the performances before you start to optimizeDON’T DO IT.For experts only: DON’T DO IT NOW!

Links:- Premature Optimization Anti-Pattern

#zenetr

Indescriptive Naming#zenetr

Indescriptive Naming● Name your classes, methods, attributes and variables properly● Don’t abbreviate, NEVER!● If you are not able to give your class a short name, maybe its

responsibilities are not WELL DEFINED● Programming languages are for HUMANS

#zenetr

Duplication#zenetr

Duplication● If you do it, you will find yourself changing your code in multiple

places.● Don’t Repeat Yourself (DRY)● Keep It Simple, Stupid! (KISS)● Be DRY not WET (We Enjoy Typing)

Links:- No, seriously. Don’t repeat yourself- DRY principle- KISS principle

#zenetr

#zenetr

SOLIDTerm describing a collection of design principles for GOOD CODE

that was coined by ROBERT C. MARTIN aka UNCLE BOB

#zenetr

What makes code SOLID?● Single Responsibility Principle● Open/Closed Principle● Liskov Substitution Principle● Interface Segregation Principle● Dependency Inversion Principle

#zenetr

Single Responsibility Principle#zenetr

Single Responsibility Principle● There should NEVER be more than ONE reason for a class to

change● Split big classes● Use LAYERS● Avoid GOD classes● Write STRAIGHTFORWARD comments

Links:- Single Responsibility Principle

#zenetr

Open/Closed Principle#zenetr

Open/Closed Principle● Software entities should be OPEN for extension but CLOSED for

manipulation● Make ALL member variables private● NO global variables, EVER● Avoid SETTERS (as much as possible)● Builder Pattern + Immutable Objects

Links:- Open/Closed Principle

#zenetr

Liskov Substitution Principle#zenetr

Liskov Substitution Principle#zenetr

public class Rectangle {

protected int width;

protected int height;

public int getArea() { return width * height; }

public void setWidth(int width) { this.width = width; }

public void setHeight(int height) { this.height = height; }}

public class Square extends Rectangle {

public void setWidth(int width) { this.width = width; this.height = width; }

public void setHeight(int height) { this.width = height; this.height = height; }

}

public class Main {

public static void main(String[] args) {

Rectangle rectangle = new Square();

rectangle.setWidth(10); rectangle.setHeight(20);

assert rectangle.getArea() == 200; // this will fail!

}

}

Liskov Substitution Principle#zenetr

● Objects in a program should be replaceable with instances of their subtypes WITHOUT ALTERING THE CORRECTNESS of the program

Links:● Liskov Substitution Principle● Circle-ellipse problem● Should sets inherit from bags?

Interface Segregation Principle#zenetr

Interface Segregation Principle#zenetr

● MANY client-specific interfaces are BETTER THAN ONE general-purpose interface.

● You should not have to implement methods you don’t use● Enforcing ISP gives you LOW COUPLING and HIGH COHESION● KEEP COMPONENTS FOCUSED and MINIMIZE DEPENDENCIES BETWEEN

THEM

Links:● Interface Segregation Principle● Coupling and Cohesion: Principles of Orthogonal OOP

Dependency Inversion Principle#zenetr

Dependency Inversion Principle#zenetr

● High level modules SHOULD NOT DEPEND upon low level modules. Both SHOULD DEPEND upon abstractions

● Abstractions should not depend upon details. Details should depend upon abstractions

● Use the same level of abstraction at a given level● It REDUCES DEPENDENCY on implementation specifics and makes

code MORE REUSABLE

Links:● Dependency Inversion Principle● Programming to the interface

Rule of thumb:USE YOUR BRAIN!

#zenetr

License:Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

#zenetr

top related