Genistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian Cancer … · Genistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian Cancer and Inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen Model . Kazim Sahin.

Post on 03-Jun-2020

6 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

Genistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian Cancer and Inhibits

Tumor Growth in Hen Model

Kazim Sahin1 Engin Yenice

2 Birdal Bilir

3 Cemal Orhan

1 Mehmet Tuzcu

4 Nurhan Sahin

1

Ibrahim H Ozercan5 Nashwa Kabil

6 Bulent Ozpolat

67and Omer Kucuk

89

1Department of Animal Nutrition Faculty of Veterinary Science Firat University Elazig Turkey

2Poultry Research Institute Ankara Turkey

3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Emory University Atlanta GA USA

4Division of Biology Faculty of Science Firat University Elazig Turkey

5Department of Pathology Faculty of Medicine Firat University Elazig Turkey

6Department of Experimental Therapeutics Unit 422 The University of Texas MD Anderson

Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

7Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNA The University of Texas MD Anderson

Cancer Center Houston Texas USA

8Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA

9Winship Cancer Institute Emory University Atlanta Georgia USA

Corresponding authors Bulent Ozpolat MD PhD Associate Professor Department of

Experimental Therapeutics Unit 422 The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center 1515

Holcombe Boulevard Houston TX 77030 Phone 713-563-0166 Fax 713-792-0362 E mail

Bozpolatmdandersonorg Omer Kucuk MD Professor of Hematology-Oncology and Urology

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University1365 Clifton Road NE Room C-2110

Atlanta GA 30322 Phone(404) 778-3460 Fax (404) 778-5520

Running title Genistein prevents development of ovarian cancer

Keywords Genistein ovarian cancer spontaneous treatment chicken hen model

Chemoprevention

Conflict of interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

ABSTRACT

Genistein the major isoflavone in soybean has been reported to exert anticancer effects

on various types of cancer including ovarian cancer however its chemopreventive effects and

mechanisms of action in ovarian cancer have not been fully elucidated in spontaneously

developing ovarian cancer models In the present study we demonstrated the preventive effects

and mechanisms of genistein in the laying hen model that develops spontaneous ovarian cancer

at high incidence rates Laying hens were randomized to three groups control (301 mghen n =

100) or low (5248 mghen n=100) and high genistein supplementation (10626 mghen per day

per group) At the end of 78 weeks hens were euthanized and ovarian tumors were collected and

analyzed We observed that genistein supplementation significantly reduced the ovarian tumor

incidence (p = 0002) as well as the number and size of the tumors (p= 00001) Molecular

analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that genistein downregulated serum malondialdehyde

(MDA) a marker for oxidative stress and the expression of NF-κB Bcl-2 and whereas it

upregulated Nrf2 HO-1 and Bax expression at protein level in ovarian tissues Moreover

genistein intake decreased the activity of mTOR pathway as evidenced by reduced

phosphorylation of mTOR p70S6K1 and 4E-BP1 Taken together our findings strongly support

the potential of genistein in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer and highlight the effects of

the genistein on the molecular pathways involved in ovarian tumorigenesis

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and the fifth leading cause of

cancer-related mortality among women in the United States An estimated 22280 new cases of

ovarian cancer and 14240 deaths (accounting for 5 of cancer deaths among women) are

expected in the US in 2016 (1) Ovarian cancer is a molecularly and histopathologically

heterogeneous disease associated with risk factors including family history of breast or ovarian

cancer age at diagnosis race and smoking (2-4) The current standard of care for ovarian cancer

involves cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (5) However the lack of

reliable screening tests for detection of ovarian cancer at early stages high rate of recurrence

after surgery and resistance to available chemotherapeutic drugs lead to poor prognosis and high

mortality with an overall 5-year survival rate of 46 (1 6-8) Therefore there is an urgent need

for novel therapeutic agents that target specific molecular defects and have the potential to

prevent ovarian cancer and improve outcomes for ovarian cancer patients

Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that the incidence of ovarian cancer as those

of breast and prostate cancers is much lower in Asian countries where soy foods are consumed

in larger amounts compared to Western countries suggesting the association between high

dietary intake of soy isoflavones and reduced risk of ovarian cancer (9-13) As the major

biologically active isoflavone in the soy diet genistein has been extensively investigated for its

chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic potential in various types of cancer Genistein is a

naturally occurring nonsteroidal plant compound with a structural similarity to the steroid

hormone estradiol (17β-estradiol) that functions as selective estrogen receptor modulators (14-

16) Several studies have shown that genistein inhibits ovarian carcinogenesis through

pleiotropic molecular mechanisms by targeting multiple signaling pathways associated with the

hormonal activity cell cycle apoptosis angiogenesis and metastasis (17-22) In addition

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

genistein has been reported to have antioxidant properties and to modulate cytokine synthesis in

ovarian cancer cells (23 17)

Although a number of mouse models for human ovarian cancer have been developed the

non-spontaneous nature of these models and the dissimilarities in the histopathology of ovarian

cancer between mouse and human limit the clinical relevance leading to an inappropriate animal

model to study human ovarian cancer (24) On the other hand the laying hen which is the only

non-human animal that spontaneously develops ovarian cancer with a high prevalence provides

a natural experimental model that recapitulates the pathogenesis of human ovarian cancer (25)

The key similarities between the ovarian cancer in the hen model and the one in human include

epidemiological histological and molecular characteristics supporting the laying hen as a

relevant preclinical model to study the molecular mechanisms underlying the spontaneous onset

and progression of human ovarian cancer and to test the chemopreventive and therapeutic effects

of novel agents on the disease (25-30) In the light of these recent findings we investigated the

effects of genistein on spontaneous ovarian cancer using the laying hen model providing further

mechanistic insights into the preventive effects of genistein on the pathogenesis of ovarian

cancer

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and experimental design

A total of 300 brown laying hens (104 weeks old ATAK-S hybrid Gallus domesticus)

were used for the study in accordance with animal welfare regulations and under the Guide for

the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute at the Ankara Poultry Research Station

Turkey (Elazig Turkey) The animal protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

and Use Committee at the Ankara Poultry Research Station Turkey Hens were fed either a basal

diet containing 1683 crude protein (CP) or 1115 megajoule (MJ) kg of metabolizable energy

(ME) and 2239 and mg of genisteinkg of diet or the basal diet reconstituted with addition of

400 mg or 800 mg of genistein per kilogram of diet at the expense of corn The genistein

contained 98 a glycone and 2 starches as a carrier (Bonistein DSM Nutritional Products

Istanbul Turkey) Daily total diet intake was 1343 1336 and 1332 gday per animals in

control low and high genistein groups respectively Animals received genistein 301 5248 and

10626 mghen per day in control low genistein and high genistein groups respectively The

dosage was chosen based on previously reported dosage in poultry (31 32) The nutrient

composition of the standard diet is listed in Supplementary Table 1 Diets were prepared in

batches and stored in black plastic containers at 4degC to avoid photooxidation The birdhouse was

set to a 16L8D cycle Water and diets were offered for ad libitum consumption throughout the

experiment The animal experiment lasted 78 weeks (from 104 to 182) weeks

Sample collection

Blood samples were collected at the end of the study from the hens via the axillary vein

and centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 minutes for obtaining serum After hens are euthanized and

ovaries and surrounding tissues were removed and the morphological and histological changes

were evaluated and compared Tumor incidence and sizes and were measured Tumor types were

determined by histological examination using hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue sections

Ovarian tumors were identified as strictly cellular masses confined to the ovary Ovarian tumor

rates were presented in the present study

Tissue and serum samples and tumor tissues were immediately frozen and stored at -80degC

until analysis Tissue samples were fixed in 10 neutral-buffered formalin routinely processed

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

for histology and embedded in paraffin Tissue blocks were used to prepare sections (6 m)

were cut The slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HampE) and were evaluated based

on the histopathology classification system listed in Table 1 (26 33 34)

Analysis of serum levels of Genistein by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

At the end of the study blood samples were collected from 12 birds randomly chosen

from each treatment group Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min and sera were

collected Sera samples were kept on the ice and protected from light until they were processed

to prevent any artifactual oxidation during the experiments Samples were stored at ndash80C until

analysis Serum genistein and daidzein concentrations were measured by high-performance

liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shimadzu Tokyo Japan) using Shimadzu fluorescence RF-10

AxL detector and C18minus ODS-3 5microm 46 times 250 mm column The serum isoflavone (genistein

and daidzein) levels were measured by the method of our previous study (35) To 200 microl of

serum were added 200 microl of b-glucuronidase type H-5 solution (Sigma Chemical St Louis MO)

in 02 M sodium acetate buffer pH 50 (3500 units of b-glucuronidase and 193 units of

sulfatase) The mixture was incubated at 37C in a shaking water bath for 2 h and then treated

with 3600 microl of methanolacetic acid (955 volvol) The mixture was vortexed for 30 s

sonicated for 30 s vortexed again for 30 s and centrifuged for 15 min at 4C and 800 g The

supernatants were evaporated We then dissolved the sample with 80 methanol at the same

volume of serum Elution was performed at a flow rate of 1 mlmin using the following linear

gradient methanolacetic acid (955 volvol A) wateracetic acid (955 volvol B) and A (by

vol) at 30 for 10 min from 30 to 70 in 35 min and from 70 to 30 in 5 min (35)

Chemical analyses of the diet samples were performed using procedures of Association of

Official Analytical Chemists (36)

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

Detection of serum malondialdehyde concentrations using HPLC

Serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) a marker for oxidative stress (n =12) were

measured using HPLC with an LC-20AD pump SIL-20A autosampler SPD-20A ultraviolet-

visible spectroscopy detector (at C18-ODS-3V and 5 m with a 46 times 250 mm column) and

CTO-10ASVP column oven (Shimadzu) as described previously (37) Tissue samples (300 L)

were homogenized in a mixture of 200 L of HClO4 (05 M) and 100 L of 500-ppm 2[6]-di-

tert-butyl-p-cresol Next the samples were centrifuged and supernatants were injected (injection

volume 20 L) into an HPLC system The mobile phase was 30 mM KH2PO4-methanol (825 +

175 vv pH 36) the flow rate was 12 mLminute and detection at 250 nm

Western blot analysis

Western blot analysis was performed as described previously (38) Proteins were

extracted from ovarian tumor samples and were homogenized at 110 (w v) in 10 mM Tris-HCl

buffer at pH 74 containing 01 mM NaCl 01 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 5 M

soluble soybean powder (Sigma St Louis MO USA) as a trypsin inhibitor Samples underwent

centrifugation at 15000 g at 4degC for 30 minutes for obtaining a supernatant Supernatants were

mixed with Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 minutes Aliquots containing 20 g of

protein were subjected to 10 sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel (PAGE)

electrophoresis and subsequently transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher amp Schuell

BioScience) Nitrocellulose membranes were washed twice for 5 minutes in phosphate-buffered

saline and blocked with 1 bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 hour prior

to application of primary antibodies Antibodies against nuclear factor (NF)-B Bcl-2 Bax p-

mTOR p-P70S6k p-4E-Bp1 nuclear factor erythroid 2 (Nrf2) and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1)

were diluted at 11000 in the buffer containing 005 Tween-20 and used Membranes were

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

striped and used blotted for with other antibodies All antibodies were purchased from Abcam

(Cambridge UK)

The nitrocellulose membrane was incubated at 4degC with antibodies overnight Western

blots were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG

(Abcam Cambridge UK) Specific binding was detected using diaminobenzidine and hydrogen

peroxide as substrates Protein loading was controlled using an anti--actin antibody (Sigma)

Samples were analyzed in quadruplicate under each experimental condition and protein levels

were measured densitometrically using the image analysis software program ImageJ (National

Institutes of Health)

Statistical analysis Tumor incidences in the control and experimental groups were

evaluated statistically using the χ2 test Data were analyzed via analysis of variance using the

general linear model with the SAS program (2002) (SAS Institute Inc) to determine the effects

of genistein supplementation on tumor size protein expressions and serum metabolites When a

significant F statistic (P le 005) in the analysis of variance was noted the least squares mean

procedure was performed to separate means that were significantly different (P lt 005) Linear

and quadratic polynomial contrasts of the responses were used to evaluate the effects of the three

dosages of genistein administered to the animals for serum metabolites

RESULTS

Genistein reduces the incidence and number of spontaneous ovarian tumors in laying hens

To investigate the effects of genistein supplementation on the development of

spontaneous ovarian tumors a total of 300 laying hens at age of 182 weeks was randomized to

three groups (n = 100 per group) (i) control (301 mgday genistein) (ii) low-dose genistein

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

(5248 mghen per day) and (iii) high-dose genistein (10626 mghen per day) (Supplementary

Figure 1) At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein the study was terminated and

necropsy was performed for the examination of gross pathology and microscopy of the tumors

(Figure 1 and 2) In hens revealed a significant effect of genistein on the incidence of

spontaneous ovarian cancer (Table 2) Thirty percent of the hens in the control group developed

ovarian tumors as reported previously (25) The incidence of ovarian cancer significantly

decreased in both LG- and HG-treated hens (19 and 10 respectively) compared with control

group (p = 0002) indicating that genistein acts in a dose-dependent manner Based on the

histopathological assessment of the tumors two subtypes of ovarian cancer including serous and

mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens representative images are illustrated in Figure

2B-C The histopathology grading system based on mitotic developments and cellular

differentiation is illustrated in Table 1 for the ovary There is no a significantly lower incidence

of adenocarcinoma in birds receiving genistein compared to the control birds (p gt 005) In the

control group 63 of tumor-bearing hens developed serous carcinoma whereas 37 of them

had mucinous carcinoma However there was no significant difference in the incidence of each

subtype of ovarian tumors between control and treatment groups (Table 2)

Additionally genistein treatment significantly reduced both the number and size of

ovarian tumors compared to the control group (Table 2) Hens in the control group had an

average of 37100 tumors (37 tumors in total number of animals 100) whereas low- and high

genistein-treated hens had 19100 and 10100 tumors respectively Average sizes of the tumors

were 281 109 and 047 mm in the control LG and HG groups respectively (p = 00001)

At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein we also observed that overall

survival rates in genistein groups were higher compared to that of control group although the

differences were not statistically significant (Table 2) In control group 83 of the hens stayed

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

alive until the end of the experiment while 88 and 91 of the animals were alive in the LG and

HG groups respectively

Genistein supplementation results in enhanced genistein levels in serum and reduced MDA

in the ovary of laying hens

To demonstrate that the lower ovarian cancer incidence in the treatment groups was

specifically due to the genistein intervention we measured serum levels of genistein and

daidzein in 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3A-B) As expected hens treated with low or

high genistein fed groups had significantly higher serum genistein levels (25183 nmoll and

35800 nmoll respectively) compared with the control animals (14875 nmoll) (p lt 005) and

the increase in the level of serum genistein was dose-dependent However genistein

supplementation had no effect on serum level of daidzein in any of the treatment groups (Figure

3B)

Several studies have shown that oxidative stress is involved in a wide variety of cancers

including ovarian cancer (35) To determine the effects of genistein on the hen ovary in the

context of oxidative stress we analyzed the levels of MDA which is a widely used marker of

oxidative stress in the ovaries of 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3C) Our data showed

that treatment of hens with genistein significantly and dose-dependently decreased the level of

MDA in the ovary (p lt 005) The average level of ovarian MDA was 304 nmolmg in the

control group while it was 199 nmolmg and 121 nmolmg in low- and high genistein-fed

groups respectively These results confirm that genistein treatment could ameliorate oxidative

stress in the hen ovary

Genistein decreases the expression of NF-κB and Bcl-2 while increasing the expression of

Bax in the ovary of laying hens

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

To characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the genistein-induced changes in

the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer we first examined the effect of genistein on the nuclear

factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway which has been shown as one of the key survival

pathways activated by oxidative stress (40) As illustrated in Figure 4A both low and high

genistein treatments significantly reduced the protein expression level of NF-κB indicating that

genistein mediates its anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer through NF-κB signaling pathway In

addition the expression levels of pro-survival Bcl-2 and pro-apoptotic Bax which are

transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB were also analyzed (Figure 4B-C) Our findings showed

that genistein significantly downregulates Bcl-2 whereas significantly upregulates Bax leading

to a reduced ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax and consequently inducing apoptosis

Genistein suppresses the mTOR pathway in the ovary of laying hens

To further explore the mechanisms involved in the genistein-induced changes in the

ovarian carcinogenesis we studied the effects of genistein on the mammalian target of

rapamycin (mTOR) survival signaling which has also been shown to be associated with

oxidative stress (41) mTOR which is a downstream target of AKT is a SerThr kinase that

phosphorylates p70S6K and 4EBP1 (42) As shown in Figure 5A-C treatment of hens with low

or high genistein significantly decreased the levels of phosphorylated proteins of mTOR

p70S6K and 4EBP1 leading to the inactivation of the mTOR signal transduction These data

demonstrate that mTOR signaling pathway also participates in the genistein-induced responses in

ovarian cancer cells

Genistein upregulates Nrf2 and HO-1 in the ovary of laying hens

It is well established that activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is

one of the major mechanisms in the cellular defense against oxidative stress (43) Similar to

Nrf2 its downstream protein HO-1 has also a protective effect against oxidative stress (44) As

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

illustrated in Figure 6A-B significantly increased levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were observed in the

genistein-treated groups indicating that genistein exerts its chemopreventive effect on the ovary

by activating the Nrf2-induced cellular stress responses

DISCUSSION

Although surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions have improved the overall survival

rates effective treatment of ovarian cancer is limited due to the major challenges such as

clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity lack of early detection strategies for the disease

tumor recurrence and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (6-8 45) Therefore

chemoprevention of ovarian cancer by non-toxic naturally occurring or synthetic agents

provides a rational approach to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer

Epidemiological studies have shown that the dietary intake of soybean is associated with reduced

risks of various types of cancer including ovarian cancer (46) Genistein the most abundant

isoflavone in soybean has been reported to play a key role in the prevention of ovarian cancer

(17-23) Although numerous epidemiological and in vitro studies have demonstrated that

genistein is an effective anti-tumor agent in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer there is a

lack of well-characterized studies that address the efficacy and mechanisms of action of genistein

in a biologically relevant in vivo model of spontaneous ovarian carcinogenesis In the present

study therefore we utilized the laying hen model to prospectively test the chemopreventive

effects of genistein on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer and to further investigate the

molecular mechanisms underlying the actions of genistein on the initiation and progression of

ovarian cancer

Laying hens have been shown to develop spontaneous ovarian cancer at a high rate

providing an appropriate natural experimental model of human ovarian cancer (25) The fact that

laying hens and humans share some similarities in reproductive physiology and hens have also

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

(AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

REFERENCES

1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

221709-1721

3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

2008 145198-5208

4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

7573-584

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

1161697-1705

11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

Ljunggren

J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

beta

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

261193-204

19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

2007 10523-30

22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

Cancer 2003 13405-12

25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

81373-379

31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

2010621001-1005

36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

2016951088-95

39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

1945

43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

112171-178

49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

18334-342

56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

149274-293

61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

6636-44

64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

2012 271918-1924

66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

common classification

Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

pattern present but not distinct

Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

common classification

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

X2 301 5248 10626

Tumor ()

Incidence

Reduction

30100

30

-

19100

19

-367

10100

10

-667

0002

X2=12701

Serous carcinoma ()

Incidence

Reduction

19100

19

-

11100

11

-421

6100

6

-684

0017

X2=8144

Mucinous carcinoma ()

Incidence

Reduction

11100

11

-

8100

8

-273

4100

4

-636

0175

X2=3485

Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

Grade 1 530

167

719

368

510

500

0084

X2=4943

Grade 2 1830

600

819

421

310

300

0196

X2=3258

Grade 3 730

233

419

211

210

200

0968

X2=0064

Number of tumors1 37100

19100 10100 00001

Sizehen mm1

281plusmn050a

109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

b 00001

Sizehen with tumors only

mm1

686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

Survival () 83100

83

88100

88

91100

91

0228

X2=2953

1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

FIGURE LEGENDS

Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

original magnification x40

Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

significantly ( P lt 005)

Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

Figure 1 Cancer Research

on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

Figure 2 Cancer Research

on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

301 5248 10626

0

100

200

300

400

500

c

b

a

A

Genistein levels mghen per day

Gen

iste

in n

mo

ll

301 5248 10626

0

20

40

60

80

B

Genistein levels mghen per day

Dai

dze

in n

mo

ll

301 5248 10626

0

1

2

3

4a

b

c

C

Genistein levels mghen per day

Ova

ry M

DA

n

mo

lm

g p

rote

in

Figure 3 Cancer Research

on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

Figure 4 Cancer Research

on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

301 5248 10626

0

50

100

150

a

b

c

A

-actin

p-mTOR

Genistein levels mghen per day

p-m

TO

R

pe

rce

nt

of

co

ntr

ol

301 5248 10626

0

50

100

150

a

b

c

B

-actin

p-p70S6K1

Genistein levels mghen per day

p-p

70

S6

K1

p

erc

en

t o

f co

ntr

ol

301 5248 10626

0

50

100

150

a

b

c

C

-actin

p-4E-BP1

Genistein levels mghen per day

p-4

E-B

P1

p

erc

en

t o

f co

ntr

ol

Figure 5 Cancer Research

on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

301 5248 10626

0

50

100

150

200

250

c

b

a

A

-actin

Nrf2

Genistein levels mghen per day

Nrf

2

pe

rce

nt

of

co

ntr

ol

301 5248 10626

0

50

100

150

200

250

c

b

a

B

-actin

HO-1

Genistein levels mghen per day

HO

-1 p

erc

en

t o

f co

ntr

ol

Figure 6 Cancer Research

on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

Updated version

1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

Access the most recent version of this article at

Material

Supplementary

89DC1

httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

Manuscript

Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

Subscriptions

Reprints and

pubsaacrorgDepartment at

To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

Permissions

Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

  • Article File
  • Figure 1
  • Figure 2
  • Figures 3-6

    ABSTRACT

    Genistein the major isoflavone in soybean has been reported to exert anticancer effects

    on various types of cancer including ovarian cancer however its chemopreventive effects and

    mechanisms of action in ovarian cancer have not been fully elucidated in spontaneously

    developing ovarian cancer models In the present study we demonstrated the preventive effects

    and mechanisms of genistein in the laying hen model that develops spontaneous ovarian cancer

    at high incidence rates Laying hens were randomized to three groups control (301 mghen n =

    100) or low (5248 mghen n=100) and high genistein supplementation (10626 mghen per day

    per group) At the end of 78 weeks hens were euthanized and ovarian tumors were collected and

    analyzed We observed that genistein supplementation significantly reduced the ovarian tumor

    incidence (p = 0002) as well as the number and size of the tumors (p= 00001) Molecular

    analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that genistein downregulated serum malondialdehyde

    (MDA) a marker for oxidative stress and the expression of NF-κB Bcl-2 and whereas it

    upregulated Nrf2 HO-1 and Bax expression at protein level in ovarian tissues Moreover

    genistein intake decreased the activity of mTOR pathway as evidenced by reduced

    phosphorylation of mTOR p70S6K1 and 4E-BP1 Taken together our findings strongly support

    the potential of genistein in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer and highlight the effects of

    the genistein on the molecular pathways involved in ovarian tumorigenesis

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    INTRODUCTION

    Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and the fifth leading cause of

    cancer-related mortality among women in the United States An estimated 22280 new cases of

    ovarian cancer and 14240 deaths (accounting for 5 of cancer deaths among women) are

    expected in the US in 2016 (1) Ovarian cancer is a molecularly and histopathologically

    heterogeneous disease associated with risk factors including family history of breast or ovarian

    cancer age at diagnosis race and smoking (2-4) The current standard of care for ovarian cancer

    involves cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (5) However the lack of

    reliable screening tests for detection of ovarian cancer at early stages high rate of recurrence

    after surgery and resistance to available chemotherapeutic drugs lead to poor prognosis and high

    mortality with an overall 5-year survival rate of 46 (1 6-8) Therefore there is an urgent need

    for novel therapeutic agents that target specific molecular defects and have the potential to

    prevent ovarian cancer and improve outcomes for ovarian cancer patients

    Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that the incidence of ovarian cancer as those

    of breast and prostate cancers is much lower in Asian countries where soy foods are consumed

    in larger amounts compared to Western countries suggesting the association between high

    dietary intake of soy isoflavones and reduced risk of ovarian cancer (9-13) As the major

    biologically active isoflavone in the soy diet genistein has been extensively investigated for its

    chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic potential in various types of cancer Genistein is a

    naturally occurring nonsteroidal plant compound with a structural similarity to the steroid

    hormone estradiol (17β-estradiol) that functions as selective estrogen receptor modulators (14-

    16) Several studies have shown that genistein inhibits ovarian carcinogenesis through

    pleiotropic molecular mechanisms by targeting multiple signaling pathways associated with the

    hormonal activity cell cycle apoptosis angiogenesis and metastasis (17-22) In addition

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    genistein has been reported to have antioxidant properties and to modulate cytokine synthesis in

    ovarian cancer cells (23 17)

    Although a number of mouse models for human ovarian cancer have been developed the

    non-spontaneous nature of these models and the dissimilarities in the histopathology of ovarian

    cancer between mouse and human limit the clinical relevance leading to an inappropriate animal

    model to study human ovarian cancer (24) On the other hand the laying hen which is the only

    non-human animal that spontaneously develops ovarian cancer with a high prevalence provides

    a natural experimental model that recapitulates the pathogenesis of human ovarian cancer (25)

    The key similarities between the ovarian cancer in the hen model and the one in human include

    epidemiological histological and molecular characteristics supporting the laying hen as a

    relevant preclinical model to study the molecular mechanisms underlying the spontaneous onset

    and progression of human ovarian cancer and to test the chemopreventive and therapeutic effects

    of novel agents on the disease (25-30) In the light of these recent findings we investigated the

    effects of genistein on spontaneous ovarian cancer using the laying hen model providing further

    mechanistic insights into the preventive effects of genistein on the pathogenesis of ovarian

    cancer

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Animals and experimental design

    A total of 300 brown laying hens (104 weeks old ATAK-S hybrid Gallus domesticus)

    were used for the study in accordance with animal welfare regulations and under the Guide for

    the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute at the Ankara Poultry Research Station

    Turkey (Elazig Turkey) The animal protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    and Use Committee at the Ankara Poultry Research Station Turkey Hens were fed either a basal

    diet containing 1683 crude protein (CP) or 1115 megajoule (MJ) kg of metabolizable energy

    (ME) and 2239 and mg of genisteinkg of diet or the basal diet reconstituted with addition of

    400 mg or 800 mg of genistein per kilogram of diet at the expense of corn The genistein

    contained 98 a glycone and 2 starches as a carrier (Bonistein DSM Nutritional Products

    Istanbul Turkey) Daily total diet intake was 1343 1336 and 1332 gday per animals in

    control low and high genistein groups respectively Animals received genistein 301 5248 and

    10626 mghen per day in control low genistein and high genistein groups respectively The

    dosage was chosen based on previously reported dosage in poultry (31 32) The nutrient

    composition of the standard diet is listed in Supplementary Table 1 Diets were prepared in

    batches and stored in black plastic containers at 4degC to avoid photooxidation The birdhouse was

    set to a 16L8D cycle Water and diets were offered for ad libitum consumption throughout the

    experiment The animal experiment lasted 78 weeks (from 104 to 182) weeks

    Sample collection

    Blood samples were collected at the end of the study from the hens via the axillary vein

    and centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 minutes for obtaining serum After hens are euthanized and

    ovaries and surrounding tissues were removed and the morphological and histological changes

    were evaluated and compared Tumor incidence and sizes and were measured Tumor types were

    determined by histological examination using hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue sections

    Ovarian tumors were identified as strictly cellular masses confined to the ovary Ovarian tumor

    rates were presented in the present study

    Tissue and serum samples and tumor tissues were immediately frozen and stored at -80degC

    until analysis Tissue samples were fixed in 10 neutral-buffered formalin routinely processed

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    for histology and embedded in paraffin Tissue blocks were used to prepare sections (6 m)

    were cut The slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HampE) and were evaluated based

    on the histopathology classification system listed in Table 1 (26 33 34)

    Analysis of serum levels of Genistein by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

    At the end of the study blood samples were collected from 12 birds randomly chosen

    from each treatment group Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min and sera were

    collected Sera samples were kept on the ice and protected from light until they were processed

    to prevent any artifactual oxidation during the experiments Samples were stored at ndash80C until

    analysis Serum genistein and daidzein concentrations were measured by high-performance

    liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shimadzu Tokyo Japan) using Shimadzu fluorescence RF-10

    AxL detector and C18minus ODS-3 5microm 46 times 250 mm column The serum isoflavone (genistein

    and daidzein) levels were measured by the method of our previous study (35) To 200 microl of

    serum were added 200 microl of b-glucuronidase type H-5 solution (Sigma Chemical St Louis MO)

    in 02 M sodium acetate buffer pH 50 (3500 units of b-glucuronidase and 193 units of

    sulfatase) The mixture was incubated at 37C in a shaking water bath for 2 h and then treated

    with 3600 microl of methanolacetic acid (955 volvol) The mixture was vortexed for 30 s

    sonicated for 30 s vortexed again for 30 s and centrifuged for 15 min at 4C and 800 g The

    supernatants were evaporated We then dissolved the sample with 80 methanol at the same

    volume of serum Elution was performed at a flow rate of 1 mlmin using the following linear

    gradient methanolacetic acid (955 volvol A) wateracetic acid (955 volvol B) and A (by

    vol) at 30 for 10 min from 30 to 70 in 35 min and from 70 to 30 in 5 min (35)

    Chemical analyses of the diet samples were performed using procedures of Association of

    Official Analytical Chemists (36)

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    Detection of serum malondialdehyde concentrations using HPLC

    Serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) a marker for oxidative stress (n =12) were

    measured using HPLC with an LC-20AD pump SIL-20A autosampler SPD-20A ultraviolet-

    visible spectroscopy detector (at C18-ODS-3V and 5 m with a 46 times 250 mm column) and

    CTO-10ASVP column oven (Shimadzu) as described previously (37) Tissue samples (300 L)

    were homogenized in a mixture of 200 L of HClO4 (05 M) and 100 L of 500-ppm 2[6]-di-

    tert-butyl-p-cresol Next the samples were centrifuged and supernatants were injected (injection

    volume 20 L) into an HPLC system The mobile phase was 30 mM KH2PO4-methanol (825 +

    175 vv pH 36) the flow rate was 12 mLminute and detection at 250 nm

    Western blot analysis

    Western blot analysis was performed as described previously (38) Proteins were

    extracted from ovarian tumor samples and were homogenized at 110 (w v) in 10 mM Tris-HCl

    buffer at pH 74 containing 01 mM NaCl 01 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 5 M

    soluble soybean powder (Sigma St Louis MO USA) as a trypsin inhibitor Samples underwent

    centrifugation at 15000 g at 4degC for 30 minutes for obtaining a supernatant Supernatants were

    mixed with Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 minutes Aliquots containing 20 g of

    protein were subjected to 10 sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel (PAGE)

    electrophoresis and subsequently transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher amp Schuell

    BioScience) Nitrocellulose membranes were washed twice for 5 minutes in phosphate-buffered

    saline and blocked with 1 bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 hour prior

    to application of primary antibodies Antibodies against nuclear factor (NF)-B Bcl-2 Bax p-

    mTOR p-P70S6k p-4E-Bp1 nuclear factor erythroid 2 (Nrf2) and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1)

    were diluted at 11000 in the buffer containing 005 Tween-20 and used Membranes were

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    striped and used blotted for with other antibodies All antibodies were purchased from Abcam

    (Cambridge UK)

    The nitrocellulose membrane was incubated at 4degC with antibodies overnight Western

    blots were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG

    (Abcam Cambridge UK) Specific binding was detected using diaminobenzidine and hydrogen

    peroxide as substrates Protein loading was controlled using an anti--actin antibody (Sigma)

    Samples were analyzed in quadruplicate under each experimental condition and protein levels

    were measured densitometrically using the image analysis software program ImageJ (National

    Institutes of Health)

    Statistical analysis Tumor incidences in the control and experimental groups were

    evaluated statistically using the χ2 test Data were analyzed via analysis of variance using the

    general linear model with the SAS program (2002) (SAS Institute Inc) to determine the effects

    of genistein supplementation on tumor size protein expressions and serum metabolites When a

    significant F statistic (P le 005) in the analysis of variance was noted the least squares mean

    procedure was performed to separate means that were significantly different (P lt 005) Linear

    and quadratic polynomial contrasts of the responses were used to evaluate the effects of the three

    dosages of genistein administered to the animals for serum metabolites

    RESULTS

    Genistein reduces the incidence and number of spontaneous ovarian tumors in laying hens

    To investigate the effects of genistein supplementation on the development of

    spontaneous ovarian tumors a total of 300 laying hens at age of 182 weeks was randomized to

    three groups (n = 100 per group) (i) control (301 mgday genistein) (ii) low-dose genistein

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    (5248 mghen per day) and (iii) high-dose genistein (10626 mghen per day) (Supplementary

    Figure 1) At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein the study was terminated and

    necropsy was performed for the examination of gross pathology and microscopy of the tumors

    (Figure 1 and 2) In hens revealed a significant effect of genistein on the incidence of

    spontaneous ovarian cancer (Table 2) Thirty percent of the hens in the control group developed

    ovarian tumors as reported previously (25) The incidence of ovarian cancer significantly

    decreased in both LG- and HG-treated hens (19 and 10 respectively) compared with control

    group (p = 0002) indicating that genistein acts in a dose-dependent manner Based on the

    histopathological assessment of the tumors two subtypes of ovarian cancer including serous and

    mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens representative images are illustrated in Figure

    2B-C The histopathology grading system based on mitotic developments and cellular

    differentiation is illustrated in Table 1 for the ovary There is no a significantly lower incidence

    of adenocarcinoma in birds receiving genistein compared to the control birds (p gt 005) In the

    control group 63 of tumor-bearing hens developed serous carcinoma whereas 37 of them

    had mucinous carcinoma However there was no significant difference in the incidence of each

    subtype of ovarian tumors between control and treatment groups (Table 2)

    Additionally genistein treatment significantly reduced both the number and size of

    ovarian tumors compared to the control group (Table 2) Hens in the control group had an

    average of 37100 tumors (37 tumors in total number of animals 100) whereas low- and high

    genistein-treated hens had 19100 and 10100 tumors respectively Average sizes of the tumors

    were 281 109 and 047 mm in the control LG and HG groups respectively (p = 00001)

    At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein we also observed that overall

    survival rates in genistein groups were higher compared to that of control group although the

    differences were not statistically significant (Table 2) In control group 83 of the hens stayed

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    alive until the end of the experiment while 88 and 91 of the animals were alive in the LG and

    HG groups respectively

    Genistein supplementation results in enhanced genistein levels in serum and reduced MDA

    in the ovary of laying hens

    To demonstrate that the lower ovarian cancer incidence in the treatment groups was

    specifically due to the genistein intervention we measured serum levels of genistein and

    daidzein in 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3A-B) As expected hens treated with low or

    high genistein fed groups had significantly higher serum genistein levels (25183 nmoll and

    35800 nmoll respectively) compared with the control animals (14875 nmoll) (p lt 005) and

    the increase in the level of serum genistein was dose-dependent However genistein

    supplementation had no effect on serum level of daidzein in any of the treatment groups (Figure

    3B)

    Several studies have shown that oxidative stress is involved in a wide variety of cancers

    including ovarian cancer (35) To determine the effects of genistein on the hen ovary in the

    context of oxidative stress we analyzed the levels of MDA which is a widely used marker of

    oxidative stress in the ovaries of 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3C) Our data showed

    that treatment of hens with genistein significantly and dose-dependently decreased the level of

    MDA in the ovary (p lt 005) The average level of ovarian MDA was 304 nmolmg in the

    control group while it was 199 nmolmg and 121 nmolmg in low- and high genistein-fed

    groups respectively These results confirm that genistein treatment could ameliorate oxidative

    stress in the hen ovary

    Genistein decreases the expression of NF-κB and Bcl-2 while increasing the expression of

    Bax in the ovary of laying hens

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    To characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the genistein-induced changes in

    the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer we first examined the effect of genistein on the nuclear

    factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway which has been shown as one of the key survival

    pathways activated by oxidative stress (40) As illustrated in Figure 4A both low and high

    genistein treatments significantly reduced the protein expression level of NF-κB indicating that

    genistein mediates its anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer through NF-κB signaling pathway In

    addition the expression levels of pro-survival Bcl-2 and pro-apoptotic Bax which are

    transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB were also analyzed (Figure 4B-C) Our findings showed

    that genistein significantly downregulates Bcl-2 whereas significantly upregulates Bax leading

    to a reduced ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax and consequently inducing apoptosis

    Genistein suppresses the mTOR pathway in the ovary of laying hens

    To further explore the mechanisms involved in the genistein-induced changes in the

    ovarian carcinogenesis we studied the effects of genistein on the mammalian target of

    rapamycin (mTOR) survival signaling which has also been shown to be associated with

    oxidative stress (41) mTOR which is a downstream target of AKT is a SerThr kinase that

    phosphorylates p70S6K and 4EBP1 (42) As shown in Figure 5A-C treatment of hens with low

    or high genistein significantly decreased the levels of phosphorylated proteins of mTOR

    p70S6K and 4EBP1 leading to the inactivation of the mTOR signal transduction These data

    demonstrate that mTOR signaling pathway also participates in the genistein-induced responses in

    ovarian cancer cells

    Genistein upregulates Nrf2 and HO-1 in the ovary of laying hens

    It is well established that activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is

    one of the major mechanisms in the cellular defense against oxidative stress (43) Similar to

    Nrf2 its downstream protein HO-1 has also a protective effect against oxidative stress (44) As

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    illustrated in Figure 6A-B significantly increased levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were observed in the

    genistein-treated groups indicating that genistein exerts its chemopreventive effect on the ovary

    by activating the Nrf2-induced cellular stress responses

    DISCUSSION

    Although surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions have improved the overall survival

    rates effective treatment of ovarian cancer is limited due to the major challenges such as

    clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity lack of early detection strategies for the disease

    tumor recurrence and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (6-8 45) Therefore

    chemoprevention of ovarian cancer by non-toxic naturally occurring or synthetic agents

    provides a rational approach to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer

    Epidemiological studies have shown that the dietary intake of soybean is associated with reduced

    risks of various types of cancer including ovarian cancer (46) Genistein the most abundant

    isoflavone in soybean has been reported to play a key role in the prevention of ovarian cancer

    (17-23) Although numerous epidemiological and in vitro studies have demonstrated that

    genistein is an effective anti-tumor agent in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer there is a

    lack of well-characterized studies that address the efficacy and mechanisms of action of genistein

    in a biologically relevant in vivo model of spontaneous ovarian carcinogenesis In the present

    study therefore we utilized the laying hen model to prospectively test the chemopreventive

    effects of genistein on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer and to further investigate the

    molecular mechanisms underlying the actions of genistein on the initiation and progression of

    ovarian cancer

    Laying hens have been shown to develop spontaneous ovarian cancer at a high rate

    providing an appropriate natural experimental model of human ovarian cancer (25) The fact that

    laying hens and humans share some similarities in reproductive physiology and hens have also

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

    induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

    classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

    humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

    observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

    cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

    factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

    antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

    Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

    identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

    the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

    been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

    contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

    To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

    chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

    study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

    intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

    demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

    ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

    addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

    was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

    ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

    prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

    hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

    of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

    genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

    that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

    It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

    associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

    first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

    control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

    a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

    exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

    Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

    inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

    which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

    NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

    known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

    Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

    cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

    Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

    κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

    adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

    including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

    suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

    significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

    the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

    ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

    factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

    protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

    activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

    activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

    kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

    resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

    motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

    that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

    and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

    that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

    PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

    Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

    protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

    cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

    associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

    proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

    Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

    allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

    (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

    activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

    associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

    demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

    master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

    Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

    prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

    Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

    expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

    involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

    In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

    that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

    modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

    and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

    biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

    protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

    improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    REFERENCES

    1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

    2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

    Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

    characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

    221709-1721

    3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

    Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

    Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

    subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

    2008 145198-5208

    4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

    carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

    5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

    6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

    G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

    7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

    J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

    8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

    7573-584

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

    reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

    10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

    gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

    1161697-1705

    11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

    Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

    Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

    12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

    H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

    Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

    cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

    13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

    Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

    apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

    14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

    Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

    pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

    to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

    15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

    16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

    Ljunggren

    J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

    beta

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

    17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

    estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

    18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

    Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

    growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

    261193-204

    19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

    human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

    20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

    arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

    pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

    21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

    induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

    2007 10523-30

    22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

    ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

    23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

    Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

    24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

    Cancer 2003 13405-12

    25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

    Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

    preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

    27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

    chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

    28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

    spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

    29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

    Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

    adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

    2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

    30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

    Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

    preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

    81373-379

    31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

    egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

    32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

    dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

    33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

    cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

    34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

    of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

    isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

    2010621001-1005

    36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

    Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

    37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

    human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

    38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

    antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

    2016951088-95

    39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

    mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

    cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

    40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

    fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

    41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

    autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

    Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

    42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

    1945

    43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

    Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

    induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

    Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

    culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

    45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

    46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

    KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

    future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

    47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

    of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

    48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

    CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

    112171-178

    49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

    proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

    50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

    ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

    51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

    hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

    52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

    pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

    53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

    54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

    kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

    cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

    18334-342

    56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

    SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

    convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

    57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

    Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

    NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

    58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

    cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

    59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

    Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

    Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

    cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

    60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

    149274-293

    61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

    electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

    62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

    in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

    63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

    6636-44

    64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

    Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

    analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

    65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

    epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

    2012 271918-1924

    66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

    AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

    cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

    67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

    Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

    68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

    with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

    69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

    tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

    Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

    Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

    Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

    common classification

    Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

    pattern present but not distinct

    Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

    common classification

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

    Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

    X2 301 5248 10626

    Tumor ()

    Incidence

    Reduction

    30100

    30

    -

    19100

    19

    -367

    10100

    10

    -667

    0002

    X2=12701

    Serous carcinoma ()

    Incidence

    Reduction

    19100

    19

    -

    11100

    11

    -421

    6100

    6

    -684

    0017

    X2=8144

    Mucinous carcinoma ()

    Incidence

    Reduction

    11100

    11

    -

    8100

    8

    -273

    4100

    4

    -636

    0175

    X2=3485

    Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

    Grade 1 530

    167

    719

    368

    510

    500

    0084

    X2=4943

    Grade 2 1830

    600

    819

    421

    310

    300

    0196

    X2=3258

    Grade 3 730

    233

    419

    211

    210

    200

    0968

    X2=0064

    Number of tumors1 37100

    19100 10100 00001

    Sizehen mm1

    281plusmn050a

    109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

    b 00001

    Sizehen with tumors only

    mm1

    686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

    Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

    Survival () 83100

    83

    88100

    88

    91100

    91

    0228

    X2=2953

    1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

    superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    FIGURE LEGENDS

    Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

    ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

    Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

    Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

    original magnification x40

    Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

    daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

    a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

    Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

    expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

    blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

    same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

    Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

    C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

    representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

    percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

    significantly ( P lt 005)

    Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

    tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

    same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    Figure 1 Cancer Research

    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    Figure 2 Cancer Research

    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    301 5248 10626

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    c

    b

    a

    A

    Genistein levels mghen per day

    Gen

    iste

    in n

    mo

    ll

    301 5248 10626

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    B

    Genistein levels mghen per day

    Dai

    dze

    in n

    mo

    ll

    301 5248 10626

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4a

    b

    c

    C

    Genistein levels mghen per day

    Ova

    ry M

    DA

    n

    mo

    lm

    g p

    rote

    in

    Figure 3 Cancer Research

    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    Figure 4 Cancer Research

    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    301 5248 10626

    0

    50

    100

    150

    a

    b

    c

    A

    -actin

    p-mTOR

    Genistein levels mghen per day

    p-m

    TO

    R

    pe

    rce

    nt

    of

    co

    ntr

    ol

    301 5248 10626

    0

    50

    100

    150

    a

    b

    c

    B

    -actin

    p-p70S6K1

    Genistein levels mghen per day

    p-p

    70

    S6

    K1

    p

    erc

    en

    t o

    f co

    ntr

    ol

    301 5248 10626

    0

    50

    100

    150

    a

    b

    c

    C

    -actin

    p-4E-BP1

    Genistein levels mghen per day

    p-4

    E-B

    P1

    p

    erc

    en

    t o

    f co

    ntr

    ol

    Figure 5 Cancer Research

    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    301 5248 10626

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    c

    b

    a

    A

    -actin

    Nrf2

    Genistein levels mghen per day

    Nrf

    2

    pe

    rce

    nt

    of

    co

    ntr

    ol

    301 5248 10626

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    c

    b

    a

    B

    -actin

    HO-1

    Genistein levels mghen per day

    HO

    -1 p

    erc

    en

    t o

    f co

    ntr

    ol

    Figure 6 Cancer Research

    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

    Updated version

    1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

    Access the most recent version of this article at

    Material

    Supplementary

    89DC1

    httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

    Manuscript

    Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

    E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

    Subscriptions

    Reprints and

    pubsaacrorgDepartment at

    To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

    Permissions

    Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

    89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

    • Article File
    • Figure 1
    • Figure 2
    • Figures 3-6

      INTRODUCTION

      Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy and the fifth leading cause of

      cancer-related mortality among women in the United States An estimated 22280 new cases of

      ovarian cancer and 14240 deaths (accounting for 5 of cancer deaths among women) are

      expected in the US in 2016 (1) Ovarian cancer is a molecularly and histopathologically

      heterogeneous disease associated with risk factors including family history of breast or ovarian

      cancer age at diagnosis race and smoking (2-4) The current standard of care for ovarian cancer

      involves cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (5) However the lack of

      reliable screening tests for detection of ovarian cancer at early stages high rate of recurrence

      after surgery and resistance to available chemotherapeutic drugs lead to poor prognosis and high

      mortality with an overall 5-year survival rate of 46 (1 6-8) Therefore there is an urgent need

      for novel therapeutic agents that target specific molecular defects and have the potential to

      prevent ovarian cancer and improve outcomes for ovarian cancer patients

      Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that the incidence of ovarian cancer as those

      of breast and prostate cancers is much lower in Asian countries where soy foods are consumed

      in larger amounts compared to Western countries suggesting the association between high

      dietary intake of soy isoflavones and reduced risk of ovarian cancer (9-13) As the major

      biologically active isoflavone in the soy diet genistein has been extensively investigated for its

      chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic potential in various types of cancer Genistein is a

      naturally occurring nonsteroidal plant compound with a structural similarity to the steroid

      hormone estradiol (17β-estradiol) that functions as selective estrogen receptor modulators (14-

      16) Several studies have shown that genistein inhibits ovarian carcinogenesis through

      pleiotropic molecular mechanisms by targeting multiple signaling pathways associated with the

      hormonal activity cell cycle apoptosis angiogenesis and metastasis (17-22) In addition

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      genistein has been reported to have antioxidant properties and to modulate cytokine synthesis in

      ovarian cancer cells (23 17)

      Although a number of mouse models for human ovarian cancer have been developed the

      non-spontaneous nature of these models and the dissimilarities in the histopathology of ovarian

      cancer between mouse and human limit the clinical relevance leading to an inappropriate animal

      model to study human ovarian cancer (24) On the other hand the laying hen which is the only

      non-human animal that spontaneously develops ovarian cancer with a high prevalence provides

      a natural experimental model that recapitulates the pathogenesis of human ovarian cancer (25)

      The key similarities between the ovarian cancer in the hen model and the one in human include

      epidemiological histological and molecular characteristics supporting the laying hen as a

      relevant preclinical model to study the molecular mechanisms underlying the spontaneous onset

      and progression of human ovarian cancer and to test the chemopreventive and therapeutic effects

      of novel agents on the disease (25-30) In the light of these recent findings we investigated the

      effects of genistein on spontaneous ovarian cancer using the laying hen model providing further

      mechanistic insights into the preventive effects of genistein on the pathogenesis of ovarian

      cancer

      MATERIALS AND METHODS

      Animals and experimental design

      A total of 300 brown laying hens (104 weeks old ATAK-S hybrid Gallus domesticus)

      were used for the study in accordance with animal welfare regulations and under the Guide for

      the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute at the Ankara Poultry Research Station

      Turkey (Elazig Turkey) The animal protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      and Use Committee at the Ankara Poultry Research Station Turkey Hens were fed either a basal

      diet containing 1683 crude protein (CP) or 1115 megajoule (MJ) kg of metabolizable energy

      (ME) and 2239 and mg of genisteinkg of diet or the basal diet reconstituted with addition of

      400 mg or 800 mg of genistein per kilogram of diet at the expense of corn The genistein

      contained 98 a glycone and 2 starches as a carrier (Bonistein DSM Nutritional Products

      Istanbul Turkey) Daily total diet intake was 1343 1336 and 1332 gday per animals in

      control low and high genistein groups respectively Animals received genistein 301 5248 and

      10626 mghen per day in control low genistein and high genistein groups respectively The

      dosage was chosen based on previously reported dosage in poultry (31 32) The nutrient

      composition of the standard diet is listed in Supplementary Table 1 Diets were prepared in

      batches and stored in black plastic containers at 4degC to avoid photooxidation The birdhouse was

      set to a 16L8D cycle Water and diets were offered for ad libitum consumption throughout the

      experiment The animal experiment lasted 78 weeks (from 104 to 182) weeks

      Sample collection

      Blood samples were collected at the end of the study from the hens via the axillary vein

      and centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 minutes for obtaining serum After hens are euthanized and

      ovaries and surrounding tissues were removed and the morphological and histological changes

      were evaluated and compared Tumor incidence and sizes and were measured Tumor types were

      determined by histological examination using hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue sections

      Ovarian tumors were identified as strictly cellular masses confined to the ovary Ovarian tumor

      rates were presented in the present study

      Tissue and serum samples and tumor tissues were immediately frozen and stored at -80degC

      until analysis Tissue samples were fixed in 10 neutral-buffered formalin routinely processed

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      for histology and embedded in paraffin Tissue blocks were used to prepare sections (6 m)

      were cut The slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HampE) and were evaluated based

      on the histopathology classification system listed in Table 1 (26 33 34)

      Analysis of serum levels of Genistein by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

      At the end of the study blood samples were collected from 12 birds randomly chosen

      from each treatment group Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min and sera were

      collected Sera samples were kept on the ice and protected from light until they were processed

      to prevent any artifactual oxidation during the experiments Samples were stored at ndash80C until

      analysis Serum genistein and daidzein concentrations were measured by high-performance

      liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shimadzu Tokyo Japan) using Shimadzu fluorescence RF-10

      AxL detector and C18minus ODS-3 5microm 46 times 250 mm column The serum isoflavone (genistein

      and daidzein) levels were measured by the method of our previous study (35) To 200 microl of

      serum were added 200 microl of b-glucuronidase type H-5 solution (Sigma Chemical St Louis MO)

      in 02 M sodium acetate buffer pH 50 (3500 units of b-glucuronidase and 193 units of

      sulfatase) The mixture was incubated at 37C in a shaking water bath for 2 h and then treated

      with 3600 microl of methanolacetic acid (955 volvol) The mixture was vortexed for 30 s

      sonicated for 30 s vortexed again for 30 s and centrifuged for 15 min at 4C and 800 g The

      supernatants were evaporated We then dissolved the sample with 80 methanol at the same

      volume of serum Elution was performed at a flow rate of 1 mlmin using the following linear

      gradient methanolacetic acid (955 volvol A) wateracetic acid (955 volvol B) and A (by

      vol) at 30 for 10 min from 30 to 70 in 35 min and from 70 to 30 in 5 min (35)

      Chemical analyses of the diet samples were performed using procedures of Association of

      Official Analytical Chemists (36)

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      Detection of serum malondialdehyde concentrations using HPLC

      Serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) a marker for oxidative stress (n =12) were

      measured using HPLC with an LC-20AD pump SIL-20A autosampler SPD-20A ultraviolet-

      visible spectroscopy detector (at C18-ODS-3V and 5 m with a 46 times 250 mm column) and

      CTO-10ASVP column oven (Shimadzu) as described previously (37) Tissue samples (300 L)

      were homogenized in a mixture of 200 L of HClO4 (05 M) and 100 L of 500-ppm 2[6]-di-

      tert-butyl-p-cresol Next the samples were centrifuged and supernatants were injected (injection

      volume 20 L) into an HPLC system The mobile phase was 30 mM KH2PO4-methanol (825 +

      175 vv pH 36) the flow rate was 12 mLminute and detection at 250 nm

      Western blot analysis

      Western blot analysis was performed as described previously (38) Proteins were

      extracted from ovarian tumor samples and were homogenized at 110 (w v) in 10 mM Tris-HCl

      buffer at pH 74 containing 01 mM NaCl 01 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 5 M

      soluble soybean powder (Sigma St Louis MO USA) as a trypsin inhibitor Samples underwent

      centrifugation at 15000 g at 4degC for 30 minutes for obtaining a supernatant Supernatants were

      mixed with Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 minutes Aliquots containing 20 g of

      protein were subjected to 10 sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel (PAGE)

      electrophoresis and subsequently transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher amp Schuell

      BioScience) Nitrocellulose membranes were washed twice for 5 minutes in phosphate-buffered

      saline and blocked with 1 bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 hour prior

      to application of primary antibodies Antibodies against nuclear factor (NF)-B Bcl-2 Bax p-

      mTOR p-P70S6k p-4E-Bp1 nuclear factor erythroid 2 (Nrf2) and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1)

      were diluted at 11000 in the buffer containing 005 Tween-20 and used Membranes were

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      striped and used blotted for with other antibodies All antibodies were purchased from Abcam

      (Cambridge UK)

      The nitrocellulose membrane was incubated at 4degC with antibodies overnight Western

      blots were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG

      (Abcam Cambridge UK) Specific binding was detected using diaminobenzidine and hydrogen

      peroxide as substrates Protein loading was controlled using an anti--actin antibody (Sigma)

      Samples were analyzed in quadruplicate under each experimental condition and protein levels

      were measured densitometrically using the image analysis software program ImageJ (National

      Institutes of Health)

      Statistical analysis Tumor incidences in the control and experimental groups were

      evaluated statistically using the χ2 test Data were analyzed via analysis of variance using the

      general linear model with the SAS program (2002) (SAS Institute Inc) to determine the effects

      of genistein supplementation on tumor size protein expressions and serum metabolites When a

      significant F statistic (P le 005) in the analysis of variance was noted the least squares mean

      procedure was performed to separate means that were significantly different (P lt 005) Linear

      and quadratic polynomial contrasts of the responses were used to evaluate the effects of the three

      dosages of genistein administered to the animals for serum metabolites

      RESULTS

      Genistein reduces the incidence and number of spontaneous ovarian tumors in laying hens

      To investigate the effects of genistein supplementation on the development of

      spontaneous ovarian tumors a total of 300 laying hens at age of 182 weeks was randomized to

      three groups (n = 100 per group) (i) control (301 mgday genistein) (ii) low-dose genistein

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      (5248 mghen per day) and (iii) high-dose genistein (10626 mghen per day) (Supplementary

      Figure 1) At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein the study was terminated and

      necropsy was performed for the examination of gross pathology and microscopy of the tumors

      (Figure 1 and 2) In hens revealed a significant effect of genistein on the incidence of

      spontaneous ovarian cancer (Table 2) Thirty percent of the hens in the control group developed

      ovarian tumors as reported previously (25) The incidence of ovarian cancer significantly

      decreased in both LG- and HG-treated hens (19 and 10 respectively) compared with control

      group (p = 0002) indicating that genistein acts in a dose-dependent manner Based on the

      histopathological assessment of the tumors two subtypes of ovarian cancer including serous and

      mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens representative images are illustrated in Figure

      2B-C The histopathology grading system based on mitotic developments and cellular

      differentiation is illustrated in Table 1 for the ovary There is no a significantly lower incidence

      of adenocarcinoma in birds receiving genistein compared to the control birds (p gt 005) In the

      control group 63 of tumor-bearing hens developed serous carcinoma whereas 37 of them

      had mucinous carcinoma However there was no significant difference in the incidence of each

      subtype of ovarian tumors between control and treatment groups (Table 2)

      Additionally genistein treatment significantly reduced both the number and size of

      ovarian tumors compared to the control group (Table 2) Hens in the control group had an

      average of 37100 tumors (37 tumors in total number of animals 100) whereas low- and high

      genistein-treated hens had 19100 and 10100 tumors respectively Average sizes of the tumors

      were 281 109 and 047 mm in the control LG and HG groups respectively (p = 00001)

      At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein we also observed that overall

      survival rates in genistein groups were higher compared to that of control group although the

      differences were not statistically significant (Table 2) In control group 83 of the hens stayed

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      alive until the end of the experiment while 88 and 91 of the animals were alive in the LG and

      HG groups respectively

      Genistein supplementation results in enhanced genistein levels in serum and reduced MDA

      in the ovary of laying hens

      To demonstrate that the lower ovarian cancer incidence in the treatment groups was

      specifically due to the genistein intervention we measured serum levels of genistein and

      daidzein in 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3A-B) As expected hens treated with low or

      high genistein fed groups had significantly higher serum genistein levels (25183 nmoll and

      35800 nmoll respectively) compared with the control animals (14875 nmoll) (p lt 005) and

      the increase in the level of serum genistein was dose-dependent However genistein

      supplementation had no effect on serum level of daidzein in any of the treatment groups (Figure

      3B)

      Several studies have shown that oxidative stress is involved in a wide variety of cancers

      including ovarian cancer (35) To determine the effects of genistein on the hen ovary in the

      context of oxidative stress we analyzed the levels of MDA which is a widely used marker of

      oxidative stress in the ovaries of 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3C) Our data showed

      that treatment of hens with genistein significantly and dose-dependently decreased the level of

      MDA in the ovary (p lt 005) The average level of ovarian MDA was 304 nmolmg in the

      control group while it was 199 nmolmg and 121 nmolmg in low- and high genistein-fed

      groups respectively These results confirm that genistein treatment could ameliorate oxidative

      stress in the hen ovary

      Genistein decreases the expression of NF-κB and Bcl-2 while increasing the expression of

      Bax in the ovary of laying hens

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      To characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the genistein-induced changes in

      the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer we first examined the effect of genistein on the nuclear

      factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway which has been shown as one of the key survival

      pathways activated by oxidative stress (40) As illustrated in Figure 4A both low and high

      genistein treatments significantly reduced the protein expression level of NF-κB indicating that

      genistein mediates its anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer through NF-κB signaling pathway In

      addition the expression levels of pro-survival Bcl-2 and pro-apoptotic Bax which are

      transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB were also analyzed (Figure 4B-C) Our findings showed

      that genistein significantly downregulates Bcl-2 whereas significantly upregulates Bax leading

      to a reduced ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax and consequently inducing apoptosis

      Genistein suppresses the mTOR pathway in the ovary of laying hens

      To further explore the mechanisms involved in the genistein-induced changes in the

      ovarian carcinogenesis we studied the effects of genistein on the mammalian target of

      rapamycin (mTOR) survival signaling which has also been shown to be associated with

      oxidative stress (41) mTOR which is a downstream target of AKT is a SerThr kinase that

      phosphorylates p70S6K and 4EBP1 (42) As shown in Figure 5A-C treatment of hens with low

      or high genistein significantly decreased the levels of phosphorylated proteins of mTOR

      p70S6K and 4EBP1 leading to the inactivation of the mTOR signal transduction These data

      demonstrate that mTOR signaling pathway also participates in the genistein-induced responses in

      ovarian cancer cells

      Genistein upregulates Nrf2 and HO-1 in the ovary of laying hens

      It is well established that activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is

      one of the major mechanisms in the cellular defense against oxidative stress (43) Similar to

      Nrf2 its downstream protein HO-1 has also a protective effect against oxidative stress (44) As

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      illustrated in Figure 6A-B significantly increased levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were observed in the

      genistein-treated groups indicating that genistein exerts its chemopreventive effect on the ovary

      by activating the Nrf2-induced cellular stress responses

      DISCUSSION

      Although surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions have improved the overall survival

      rates effective treatment of ovarian cancer is limited due to the major challenges such as

      clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity lack of early detection strategies for the disease

      tumor recurrence and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (6-8 45) Therefore

      chemoprevention of ovarian cancer by non-toxic naturally occurring or synthetic agents

      provides a rational approach to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer

      Epidemiological studies have shown that the dietary intake of soybean is associated with reduced

      risks of various types of cancer including ovarian cancer (46) Genistein the most abundant

      isoflavone in soybean has been reported to play a key role in the prevention of ovarian cancer

      (17-23) Although numerous epidemiological and in vitro studies have demonstrated that

      genistein is an effective anti-tumor agent in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer there is a

      lack of well-characterized studies that address the efficacy and mechanisms of action of genistein

      in a biologically relevant in vivo model of spontaneous ovarian carcinogenesis In the present

      study therefore we utilized the laying hen model to prospectively test the chemopreventive

      effects of genistein on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer and to further investigate the

      molecular mechanisms underlying the actions of genistein on the initiation and progression of

      ovarian cancer

      Laying hens have been shown to develop spontaneous ovarian cancer at a high rate

      providing an appropriate natural experimental model of human ovarian cancer (25) The fact that

      laying hens and humans share some similarities in reproductive physiology and hens have also

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

      induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

      classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

      humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

      observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

      cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

      factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

      antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

      Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

      identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

      the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

      been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

      contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

      To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

      chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

      study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

      intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

      demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

      ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

      addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

      was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

      ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

      prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

      hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

      of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

      genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

      that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

      It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

      associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

      first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

      control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

      a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

      exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

      Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

      inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

      which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

      NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

      known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

      Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

      cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

      Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

      κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

      adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

      including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

      suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

      significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

      the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

      ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

      factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

      protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

      activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

      activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

      kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

      resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

      motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

      that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

      and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

      that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

      PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

      Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

      protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

      cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

      associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

      proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

      Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

      allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

      (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

      activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

      associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

      demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

      master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

      Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

      prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

      Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

      expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

      involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

      In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

      that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

      modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

      and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

      biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

      protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

      improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      REFERENCES

      1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

      2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

      Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

      characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

      221709-1721

      3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

      Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

      Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

      subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

      2008 145198-5208

      4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

      carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

      5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

      6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

      G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

      7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

      J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

      8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

      7573-584

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

      reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

      10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

      gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

      1161697-1705

      11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

      Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

      Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

      12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

      H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

      Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

      cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

      13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

      Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

      apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

      14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

      Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

      pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

      to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

      15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

      16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

      Ljunggren

      J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

      beta

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

      17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

      estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

      18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

      Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

      growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

      261193-204

      19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

      human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

      20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

      arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

      pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

      21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

      induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

      2007 10523-30

      22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

      ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

      23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

      Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

      24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

      Cancer 2003 13405-12

      25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

      Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

      preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

      27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

      chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

      28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

      spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

      29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

      Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

      adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

      2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

      30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

      Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

      preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

      81373-379

      31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

      egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

      32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

      dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

      33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

      cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

      34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

      of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

      isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

      2010621001-1005

      36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

      Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

      37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

      human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

      38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

      antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

      2016951088-95

      39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

      mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

      cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

      40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

      fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

      41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

      autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

      Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

      42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

      1945

      43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

      Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

      induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

      Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

      culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

      45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

      46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

      KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

      future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

      47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

      of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

      48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

      CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

      112171-178

      49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

      proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

      50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

      ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

      51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

      hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

      52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

      pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

      53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

      54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

      kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

      cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

      18334-342

      56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

      SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

      convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

      57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

      Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

      NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

      58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

      cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

      59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

      Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

      Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

      cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

      60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

      149274-293

      61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

      electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

      62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

      in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

      63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

      6636-44

      64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

      Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

      analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

      65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

      epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

      2012 271918-1924

      66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

      AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

      cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

      67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

      Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

      68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

      with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

      69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

      tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

      Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

      Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

      Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

      common classification

      Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

      pattern present but not distinct

      Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

      common classification

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

      Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

      X2 301 5248 10626

      Tumor ()

      Incidence

      Reduction

      30100

      30

      -

      19100

      19

      -367

      10100

      10

      -667

      0002

      X2=12701

      Serous carcinoma ()

      Incidence

      Reduction

      19100

      19

      -

      11100

      11

      -421

      6100

      6

      -684

      0017

      X2=8144

      Mucinous carcinoma ()

      Incidence

      Reduction

      11100

      11

      -

      8100

      8

      -273

      4100

      4

      -636

      0175

      X2=3485

      Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

      Grade 1 530

      167

      719

      368

      510

      500

      0084

      X2=4943

      Grade 2 1830

      600

      819

      421

      310

      300

      0196

      X2=3258

      Grade 3 730

      233

      419

      211

      210

      200

      0968

      X2=0064

      Number of tumors1 37100

      19100 10100 00001

      Sizehen mm1

      281plusmn050a

      109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

      b 00001

      Sizehen with tumors only

      mm1

      686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

      Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

      Survival () 83100

      83

      88100

      88

      91100

      91

      0228

      X2=2953

      1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

      superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      FIGURE LEGENDS

      Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

      ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

      Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

      Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

      original magnification x40

      Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

      daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

      a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

      Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

      expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

      blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

      same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

      Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

      C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

      representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

      percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

      significantly ( P lt 005)

      Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

      tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

      same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      Figure 1 Cancer Research

      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      Figure 2 Cancer Research

      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      301 5248 10626

      0

      100

      200

      300

      400

      500

      c

      b

      a

      A

      Genistein levels mghen per day

      Gen

      iste

      in n

      mo

      ll

      301 5248 10626

      0

      20

      40

      60

      80

      B

      Genistein levels mghen per day

      Dai

      dze

      in n

      mo

      ll

      301 5248 10626

      0

      1

      2

      3

      4a

      b

      c

      C

      Genistein levels mghen per day

      Ova

      ry M

      DA

      n

      mo

      lm

      g p

      rote

      in

      Figure 3 Cancer Research

      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      Figure 4 Cancer Research

      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      301 5248 10626

      0

      50

      100

      150

      a

      b

      c

      A

      -actin

      p-mTOR

      Genistein levels mghen per day

      p-m

      TO

      R

      pe

      rce

      nt

      of

      co

      ntr

      ol

      301 5248 10626

      0

      50

      100

      150

      a

      b

      c

      B

      -actin

      p-p70S6K1

      Genistein levels mghen per day

      p-p

      70

      S6

      K1

      p

      erc

      en

      t o

      f co

      ntr

      ol

      301 5248 10626

      0

      50

      100

      150

      a

      b

      c

      C

      -actin

      p-4E-BP1

      Genistein levels mghen per day

      p-4

      E-B

      P1

      p

      erc

      en

      t o

      f co

      ntr

      ol

      Figure 5 Cancer Research

      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      301 5248 10626

      0

      50

      100

      150

      200

      250

      c

      b

      a

      A

      -actin

      Nrf2

      Genistein levels mghen per day

      Nrf

      2

      pe

      rce

      nt

      of

      co

      ntr

      ol

      301 5248 10626

      0

      50

      100

      150

      200

      250

      c

      b

      a

      B

      -actin

      HO-1

      Genistein levels mghen per day

      HO

      -1 p

      erc

      en

      t o

      f co

      ntr

      ol

      Figure 6 Cancer Research

      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

      Updated version

      1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

      Access the most recent version of this article at

      Material

      Supplementary

      89DC1

      httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

      Manuscript

      Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

      E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

      Subscriptions

      Reprints and

      pubsaacrorgDepartment at

      To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

      Permissions

      Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

      89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

      • Article File
      • Figure 1
      • Figure 2
      • Figures 3-6

        genistein has been reported to have antioxidant properties and to modulate cytokine synthesis in

        ovarian cancer cells (23 17)

        Although a number of mouse models for human ovarian cancer have been developed the

        non-spontaneous nature of these models and the dissimilarities in the histopathology of ovarian

        cancer between mouse and human limit the clinical relevance leading to an inappropriate animal

        model to study human ovarian cancer (24) On the other hand the laying hen which is the only

        non-human animal that spontaneously develops ovarian cancer with a high prevalence provides

        a natural experimental model that recapitulates the pathogenesis of human ovarian cancer (25)

        The key similarities between the ovarian cancer in the hen model and the one in human include

        epidemiological histological and molecular characteristics supporting the laying hen as a

        relevant preclinical model to study the molecular mechanisms underlying the spontaneous onset

        and progression of human ovarian cancer and to test the chemopreventive and therapeutic effects

        of novel agents on the disease (25-30) In the light of these recent findings we investigated the

        effects of genistein on spontaneous ovarian cancer using the laying hen model providing further

        mechanistic insights into the preventive effects of genistein on the pathogenesis of ovarian

        cancer

        MATERIALS AND METHODS

        Animals and experimental design

        A total of 300 brown laying hens (104 weeks old ATAK-S hybrid Gallus domesticus)

        were used for the study in accordance with animal welfare regulations and under the Guide for

        the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute at the Ankara Poultry Research Station

        Turkey (Elazig Turkey) The animal protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        and Use Committee at the Ankara Poultry Research Station Turkey Hens were fed either a basal

        diet containing 1683 crude protein (CP) or 1115 megajoule (MJ) kg of metabolizable energy

        (ME) and 2239 and mg of genisteinkg of diet or the basal diet reconstituted with addition of

        400 mg or 800 mg of genistein per kilogram of diet at the expense of corn The genistein

        contained 98 a glycone and 2 starches as a carrier (Bonistein DSM Nutritional Products

        Istanbul Turkey) Daily total diet intake was 1343 1336 and 1332 gday per animals in

        control low and high genistein groups respectively Animals received genistein 301 5248 and

        10626 mghen per day in control low genistein and high genistein groups respectively The

        dosage was chosen based on previously reported dosage in poultry (31 32) The nutrient

        composition of the standard diet is listed in Supplementary Table 1 Diets were prepared in

        batches and stored in black plastic containers at 4degC to avoid photooxidation The birdhouse was

        set to a 16L8D cycle Water and diets were offered for ad libitum consumption throughout the

        experiment The animal experiment lasted 78 weeks (from 104 to 182) weeks

        Sample collection

        Blood samples were collected at the end of the study from the hens via the axillary vein

        and centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 minutes for obtaining serum After hens are euthanized and

        ovaries and surrounding tissues were removed and the morphological and histological changes

        were evaluated and compared Tumor incidence and sizes and were measured Tumor types were

        determined by histological examination using hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue sections

        Ovarian tumors were identified as strictly cellular masses confined to the ovary Ovarian tumor

        rates were presented in the present study

        Tissue and serum samples and tumor tissues were immediately frozen and stored at -80degC

        until analysis Tissue samples were fixed in 10 neutral-buffered formalin routinely processed

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        for histology and embedded in paraffin Tissue blocks were used to prepare sections (6 m)

        were cut The slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HampE) and were evaluated based

        on the histopathology classification system listed in Table 1 (26 33 34)

        Analysis of serum levels of Genistein by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

        At the end of the study blood samples were collected from 12 birds randomly chosen

        from each treatment group Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min and sera were

        collected Sera samples were kept on the ice and protected from light until they were processed

        to prevent any artifactual oxidation during the experiments Samples were stored at ndash80C until

        analysis Serum genistein and daidzein concentrations were measured by high-performance

        liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shimadzu Tokyo Japan) using Shimadzu fluorescence RF-10

        AxL detector and C18minus ODS-3 5microm 46 times 250 mm column The serum isoflavone (genistein

        and daidzein) levels were measured by the method of our previous study (35) To 200 microl of

        serum were added 200 microl of b-glucuronidase type H-5 solution (Sigma Chemical St Louis MO)

        in 02 M sodium acetate buffer pH 50 (3500 units of b-glucuronidase and 193 units of

        sulfatase) The mixture was incubated at 37C in a shaking water bath for 2 h and then treated

        with 3600 microl of methanolacetic acid (955 volvol) The mixture was vortexed for 30 s

        sonicated for 30 s vortexed again for 30 s and centrifuged for 15 min at 4C and 800 g The

        supernatants were evaporated We then dissolved the sample with 80 methanol at the same

        volume of serum Elution was performed at a flow rate of 1 mlmin using the following linear

        gradient methanolacetic acid (955 volvol A) wateracetic acid (955 volvol B) and A (by

        vol) at 30 for 10 min from 30 to 70 in 35 min and from 70 to 30 in 5 min (35)

        Chemical analyses of the diet samples were performed using procedures of Association of

        Official Analytical Chemists (36)

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        Detection of serum malondialdehyde concentrations using HPLC

        Serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) a marker for oxidative stress (n =12) were

        measured using HPLC with an LC-20AD pump SIL-20A autosampler SPD-20A ultraviolet-

        visible spectroscopy detector (at C18-ODS-3V and 5 m with a 46 times 250 mm column) and

        CTO-10ASVP column oven (Shimadzu) as described previously (37) Tissue samples (300 L)

        were homogenized in a mixture of 200 L of HClO4 (05 M) and 100 L of 500-ppm 2[6]-di-

        tert-butyl-p-cresol Next the samples were centrifuged and supernatants were injected (injection

        volume 20 L) into an HPLC system The mobile phase was 30 mM KH2PO4-methanol (825 +

        175 vv pH 36) the flow rate was 12 mLminute and detection at 250 nm

        Western blot analysis

        Western blot analysis was performed as described previously (38) Proteins were

        extracted from ovarian tumor samples and were homogenized at 110 (w v) in 10 mM Tris-HCl

        buffer at pH 74 containing 01 mM NaCl 01 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 5 M

        soluble soybean powder (Sigma St Louis MO USA) as a trypsin inhibitor Samples underwent

        centrifugation at 15000 g at 4degC for 30 minutes for obtaining a supernatant Supernatants were

        mixed with Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 minutes Aliquots containing 20 g of

        protein were subjected to 10 sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel (PAGE)

        electrophoresis and subsequently transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher amp Schuell

        BioScience) Nitrocellulose membranes were washed twice for 5 minutes in phosphate-buffered

        saline and blocked with 1 bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 hour prior

        to application of primary antibodies Antibodies against nuclear factor (NF)-B Bcl-2 Bax p-

        mTOR p-P70S6k p-4E-Bp1 nuclear factor erythroid 2 (Nrf2) and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1)

        were diluted at 11000 in the buffer containing 005 Tween-20 and used Membranes were

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        striped and used blotted for with other antibodies All antibodies were purchased from Abcam

        (Cambridge UK)

        The nitrocellulose membrane was incubated at 4degC with antibodies overnight Western

        blots were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG

        (Abcam Cambridge UK) Specific binding was detected using diaminobenzidine and hydrogen

        peroxide as substrates Protein loading was controlled using an anti--actin antibody (Sigma)

        Samples were analyzed in quadruplicate under each experimental condition and protein levels

        were measured densitometrically using the image analysis software program ImageJ (National

        Institutes of Health)

        Statistical analysis Tumor incidences in the control and experimental groups were

        evaluated statistically using the χ2 test Data were analyzed via analysis of variance using the

        general linear model with the SAS program (2002) (SAS Institute Inc) to determine the effects

        of genistein supplementation on tumor size protein expressions and serum metabolites When a

        significant F statistic (P le 005) in the analysis of variance was noted the least squares mean

        procedure was performed to separate means that were significantly different (P lt 005) Linear

        and quadratic polynomial contrasts of the responses were used to evaluate the effects of the three

        dosages of genistein administered to the animals for serum metabolites

        RESULTS

        Genistein reduces the incidence and number of spontaneous ovarian tumors in laying hens

        To investigate the effects of genistein supplementation on the development of

        spontaneous ovarian tumors a total of 300 laying hens at age of 182 weeks was randomized to

        three groups (n = 100 per group) (i) control (301 mgday genistein) (ii) low-dose genistein

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        (5248 mghen per day) and (iii) high-dose genistein (10626 mghen per day) (Supplementary

        Figure 1) At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein the study was terminated and

        necropsy was performed for the examination of gross pathology and microscopy of the tumors

        (Figure 1 and 2) In hens revealed a significant effect of genistein on the incidence of

        spontaneous ovarian cancer (Table 2) Thirty percent of the hens in the control group developed

        ovarian tumors as reported previously (25) The incidence of ovarian cancer significantly

        decreased in both LG- and HG-treated hens (19 and 10 respectively) compared with control

        group (p = 0002) indicating that genistein acts in a dose-dependent manner Based on the

        histopathological assessment of the tumors two subtypes of ovarian cancer including serous and

        mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens representative images are illustrated in Figure

        2B-C The histopathology grading system based on mitotic developments and cellular

        differentiation is illustrated in Table 1 for the ovary There is no a significantly lower incidence

        of adenocarcinoma in birds receiving genistein compared to the control birds (p gt 005) In the

        control group 63 of tumor-bearing hens developed serous carcinoma whereas 37 of them

        had mucinous carcinoma However there was no significant difference in the incidence of each

        subtype of ovarian tumors between control and treatment groups (Table 2)

        Additionally genistein treatment significantly reduced both the number and size of

        ovarian tumors compared to the control group (Table 2) Hens in the control group had an

        average of 37100 tumors (37 tumors in total number of animals 100) whereas low- and high

        genistein-treated hens had 19100 and 10100 tumors respectively Average sizes of the tumors

        were 281 109 and 047 mm in the control LG and HG groups respectively (p = 00001)

        At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein we also observed that overall

        survival rates in genistein groups were higher compared to that of control group although the

        differences were not statistically significant (Table 2) In control group 83 of the hens stayed

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        alive until the end of the experiment while 88 and 91 of the animals were alive in the LG and

        HG groups respectively

        Genistein supplementation results in enhanced genistein levels in serum and reduced MDA

        in the ovary of laying hens

        To demonstrate that the lower ovarian cancer incidence in the treatment groups was

        specifically due to the genistein intervention we measured serum levels of genistein and

        daidzein in 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3A-B) As expected hens treated with low or

        high genistein fed groups had significantly higher serum genistein levels (25183 nmoll and

        35800 nmoll respectively) compared with the control animals (14875 nmoll) (p lt 005) and

        the increase in the level of serum genistein was dose-dependent However genistein

        supplementation had no effect on serum level of daidzein in any of the treatment groups (Figure

        3B)

        Several studies have shown that oxidative stress is involved in a wide variety of cancers

        including ovarian cancer (35) To determine the effects of genistein on the hen ovary in the

        context of oxidative stress we analyzed the levels of MDA which is a widely used marker of

        oxidative stress in the ovaries of 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3C) Our data showed

        that treatment of hens with genistein significantly and dose-dependently decreased the level of

        MDA in the ovary (p lt 005) The average level of ovarian MDA was 304 nmolmg in the

        control group while it was 199 nmolmg and 121 nmolmg in low- and high genistein-fed

        groups respectively These results confirm that genistein treatment could ameliorate oxidative

        stress in the hen ovary

        Genistein decreases the expression of NF-κB and Bcl-2 while increasing the expression of

        Bax in the ovary of laying hens

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        To characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the genistein-induced changes in

        the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer we first examined the effect of genistein on the nuclear

        factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway which has been shown as one of the key survival

        pathways activated by oxidative stress (40) As illustrated in Figure 4A both low and high

        genistein treatments significantly reduced the protein expression level of NF-κB indicating that

        genistein mediates its anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer through NF-κB signaling pathway In

        addition the expression levels of pro-survival Bcl-2 and pro-apoptotic Bax which are

        transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB were also analyzed (Figure 4B-C) Our findings showed

        that genistein significantly downregulates Bcl-2 whereas significantly upregulates Bax leading

        to a reduced ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax and consequently inducing apoptosis

        Genistein suppresses the mTOR pathway in the ovary of laying hens

        To further explore the mechanisms involved in the genistein-induced changes in the

        ovarian carcinogenesis we studied the effects of genistein on the mammalian target of

        rapamycin (mTOR) survival signaling which has also been shown to be associated with

        oxidative stress (41) mTOR which is a downstream target of AKT is a SerThr kinase that

        phosphorylates p70S6K and 4EBP1 (42) As shown in Figure 5A-C treatment of hens with low

        or high genistein significantly decreased the levels of phosphorylated proteins of mTOR

        p70S6K and 4EBP1 leading to the inactivation of the mTOR signal transduction These data

        demonstrate that mTOR signaling pathway also participates in the genistein-induced responses in

        ovarian cancer cells

        Genistein upregulates Nrf2 and HO-1 in the ovary of laying hens

        It is well established that activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is

        one of the major mechanisms in the cellular defense against oxidative stress (43) Similar to

        Nrf2 its downstream protein HO-1 has also a protective effect against oxidative stress (44) As

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        illustrated in Figure 6A-B significantly increased levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were observed in the

        genistein-treated groups indicating that genistein exerts its chemopreventive effect on the ovary

        by activating the Nrf2-induced cellular stress responses

        DISCUSSION

        Although surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions have improved the overall survival

        rates effective treatment of ovarian cancer is limited due to the major challenges such as

        clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity lack of early detection strategies for the disease

        tumor recurrence and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (6-8 45) Therefore

        chemoprevention of ovarian cancer by non-toxic naturally occurring or synthetic agents

        provides a rational approach to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer

        Epidemiological studies have shown that the dietary intake of soybean is associated with reduced

        risks of various types of cancer including ovarian cancer (46) Genistein the most abundant

        isoflavone in soybean has been reported to play a key role in the prevention of ovarian cancer

        (17-23) Although numerous epidemiological and in vitro studies have demonstrated that

        genistein is an effective anti-tumor agent in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer there is a

        lack of well-characterized studies that address the efficacy and mechanisms of action of genistein

        in a biologically relevant in vivo model of spontaneous ovarian carcinogenesis In the present

        study therefore we utilized the laying hen model to prospectively test the chemopreventive

        effects of genistein on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer and to further investigate the

        molecular mechanisms underlying the actions of genistein on the initiation and progression of

        ovarian cancer

        Laying hens have been shown to develop spontaneous ovarian cancer at a high rate

        providing an appropriate natural experimental model of human ovarian cancer (25) The fact that

        laying hens and humans share some similarities in reproductive physiology and hens have also

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

        induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

        classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

        humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

        observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

        cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

        factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

        antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

        Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

        identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

        the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

        been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

        contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

        To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

        chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

        study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

        intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

        demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

        ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

        addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

        was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

        ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

        prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

        hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

        of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

        genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

        that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

        It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

        associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

        first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

        control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

        a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

        exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

        Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

        inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

        which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

        NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

        known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

        Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

        cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

        Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

        κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

        adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

        including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

        suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

        significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

        the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

        ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

        factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

        protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

        activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

        activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

        kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

        resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

        motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

        that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

        and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

        that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

        PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

        Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

        protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

        cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

        associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

        proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

        Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

        allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

        (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

        activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

        associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

        demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

        master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

        Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

        prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

        Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

        expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

        involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

        In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

        that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

        modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

        and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

        biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

        protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

        improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        REFERENCES

        1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

        2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

        Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

        characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

        221709-1721

        3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

        Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

        Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

        subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

        2008 145198-5208

        4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

        carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

        5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

        6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

        G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

        7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

        J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

        8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

        7573-584

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

        reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

        10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

        gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

        1161697-1705

        11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

        Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

        Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

        12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

        H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

        Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

        cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

        13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

        Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

        apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

        14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

        Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

        pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

        to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

        15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

        16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

        Ljunggren

        J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

        beta

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

        17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

        estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

        18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

        Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

        growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

        261193-204

        19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

        human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

        20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

        arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

        pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

        21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

        induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

        2007 10523-30

        22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

        ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

        23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

        Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

        24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

        Cancer 2003 13405-12

        25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

        Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

        preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

        27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

        chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

        28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

        spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

        29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

        Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

        adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

        2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

        30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

        Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

        preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

        81373-379

        31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

        egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

        32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

        dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

        33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

        cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

        34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

        of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

        isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

        2010621001-1005

        36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

        Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

        37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

        human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

        38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

        antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

        2016951088-95

        39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

        mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

        cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

        40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

        fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

        41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

        autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

        Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

        42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

        1945

        43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

        Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

        induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

        Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

        culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

        45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

        46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

        KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

        future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

        47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

        of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

        48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

        CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

        112171-178

        49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

        proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

        50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

        ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

        51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

        hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

        52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

        pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

        53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

        54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

        kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

        cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

        18334-342

        56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

        SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

        convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

        57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

        Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

        NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

        58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

        cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

        59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

        Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

        Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

        cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

        60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

        149274-293

        61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

        electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

        62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

        in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

        63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

        6636-44

        64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

        Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

        analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

        65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

        epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

        2012 271918-1924

        66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

        AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

        cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

        67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

        Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

        68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

        with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

        69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

        tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

        Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

        Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

        Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

        common classification

        Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

        pattern present but not distinct

        Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

        common classification

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

        Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

        X2 301 5248 10626

        Tumor ()

        Incidence

        Reduction

        30100

        30

        -

        19100

        19

        -367

        10100

        10

        -667

        0002

        X2=12701

        Serous carcinoma ()

        Incidence

        Reduction

        19100

        19

        -

        11100

        11

        -421

        6100

        6

        -684

        0017

        X2=8144

        Mucinous carcinoma ()

        Incidence

        Reduction

        11100

        11

        -

        8100

        8

        -273

        4100

        4

        -636

        0175

        X2=3485

        Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

        Grade 1 530

        167

        719

        368

        510

        500

        0084

        X2=4943

        Grade 2 1830

        600

        819

        421

        310

        300

        0196

        X2=3258

        Grade 3 730

        233

        419

        211

        210

        200

        0968

        X2=0064

        Number of tumors1 37100

        19100 10100 00001

        Sizehen mm1

        281plusmn050a

        109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

        b 00001

        Sizehen with tumors only

        mm1

        686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

        Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

        Survival () 83100

        83

        88100

        88

        91100

        91

        0228

        X2=2953

        1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

        superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        FIGURE LEGENDS

        Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

        ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

        Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

        Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

        original magnification x40

        Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

        daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

        a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

        Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

        expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

        blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

        same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

        Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

        C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

        representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

        percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

        significantly ( P lt 005)

        Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

        tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

        same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        Figure 1 Cancer Research

        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        Figure 2 Cancer Research

        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        301 5248 10626

        0

        100

        200

        300

        400

        500

        c

        b

        a

        A

        Genistein levels mghen per day

        Gen

        iste

        in n

        mo

        ll

        301 5248 10626

        0

        20

        40

        60

        80

        B

        Genistein levels mghen per day

        Dai

        dze

        in n

        mo

        ll

        301 5248 10626

        0

        1

        2

        3

        4a

        b

        c

        C

        Genistein levels mghen per day

        Ova

        ry M

        DA

        n

        mo

        lm

        g p

        rote

        in

        Figure 3 Cancer Research

        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        Figure 4 Cancer Research

        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        301 5248 10626

        0

        50

        100

        150

        a

        b

        c

        A

        -actin

        p-mTOR

        Genistein levels mghen per day

        p-m

        TO

        R

        pe

        rce

        nt

        of

        co

        ntr

        ol

        301 5248 10626

        0

        50

        100

        150

        a

        b

        c

        B

        -actin

        p-p70S6K1

        Genistein levels mghen per day

        p-p

        70

        S6

        K1

        p

        erc

        en

        t o

        f co

        ntr

        ol

        301 5248 10626

        0

        50

        100

        150

        a

        b

        c

        C

        -actin

        p-4E-BP1

        Genistein levels mghen per day

        p-4

        E-B

        P1

        p

        erc

        en

        t o

        f co

        ntr

        ol

        Figure 5 Cancer Research

        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        301 5248 10626

        0

        50

        100

        150

        200

        250

        c

        b

        a

        A

        -actin

        Nrf2

        Genistein levels mghen per day

        Nrf

        2

        pe

        rce

        nt

        of

        co

        ntr

        ol

        301 5248 10626

        0

        50

        100

        150

        200

        250

        c

        b

        a

        B

        -actin

        HO-1

        Genistein levels mghen per day

        HO

        -1 p

        erc

        en

        t o

        f co

        ntr

        ol

        Figure 6 Cancer Research

        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

        Updated version

        1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

        Access the most recent version of this article at

        Material

        Supplementary

        89DC1

        httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

        Manuscript

        Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

        E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

        Subscriptions

        Reprints and

        pubsaacrorgDepartment at

        To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

        Permissions

        Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

        89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

        • Article File
        • Figure 1
        • Figure 2
        • Figures 3-6

          and Use Committee at the Ankara Poultry Research Station Turkey Hens were fed either a basal

          diet containing 1683 crude protein (CP) or 1115 megajoule (MJ) kg of metabolizable energy

          (ME) and 2239 and mg of genisteinkg of diet or the basal diet reconstituted with addition of

          400 mg or 800 mg of genistein per kilogram of diet at the expense of corn The genistein

          contained 98 a glycone and 2 starches as a carrier (Bonistein DSM Nutritional Products

          Istanbul Turkey) Daily total diet intake was 1343 1336 and 1332 gday per animals in

          control low and high genistein groups respectively Animals received genistein 301 5248 and

          10626 mghen per day in control low genistein and high genistein groups respectively The

          dosage was chosen based on previously reported dosage in poultry (31 32) The nutrient

          composition of the standard diet is listed in Supplementary Table 1 Diets were prepared in

          batches and stored in black plastic containers at 4degC to avoid photooxidation The birdhouse was

          set to a 16L8D cycle Water and diets were offered for ad libitum consumption throughout the

          experiment The animal experiment lasted 78 weeks (from 104 to 182) weeks

          Sample collection

          Blood samples were collected at the end of the study from the hens via the axillary vein

          and centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 minutes for obtaining serum After hens are euthanized and

          ovaries and surrounding tissues were removed and the morphological and histological changes

          were evaluated and compared Tumor incidence and sizes and were measured Tumor types were

          determined by histological examination using hematoxylin and eosin staining of tissue sections

          Ovarian tumors were identified as strictly cellular masses confined to the ovary Ovarian tumor

          rates were presented in the present study

          Tissue and serum samples and tumor tissues were immediately frozen and stored at -80degC

          until analysis Tissue samples were fixed in 10 neutral-buffered formalin routinely processed

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          for histology and embedded in paraffin Tissue blocks were used to prepare sections (6 m)

          were cut The slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HampE) and were evaluated based

          on the histopathology classification system listed in Table 1 (26 33 34)

          Analysis of serum levels of Genistein by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

          At the end of the study blood samples were collected from 12 birds randomly chosen

          from each treatment group Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min and sera were

          collected Sera samples were kept on the ice and protected from light until they were processed

          to prevent any artifactual oxidation during the experiments Samples were stored at ndash80C until

          analysis Serum genistein and daidzein concentrations were measured by high-performance

          liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shimadzu Tokyo Japan) using Shimadzu fluorescence RF-10

          AxL detector and C18minus ODS-3 5microm 46 times 250 mm column The serum isoflavone (genistein

          and daidzein) levels were measured by the method of our previous study (35) To 200 microl of

          serum were added 200 microl of b-glucuronidase type H-5 solution (Sigma Chemical St Louis MO)

          in 02 M sodium acetate buffer pH 50 (3500 units of b-glucuronidase and 193 units of

          sulfatase) The mixture was incubated at 37C in a shaking water bath for 2 h and then treated

          with 3600 microl of methanolacetic acid (955 volvol) The mixture was vortexed for 30 s

          sonicated for 30 s vortexed again for 30 s and centrifuged for 15 min at 4C and 800 g The

          supernatants were evaporated We then dissolved the sample with 80 methanol at the same

          volume of serum Elution was performed at a flow rate of 1 mlmin using the following linear

          gradient methanolacetic acid (955 volvol A) wateracetic acid (955 volvol B) and A (by

          vol) at 30 for 10 min from 30 to 70 in 35 min and from 70 to 30 in 5 min (35)

          Chemical analyses of the diet samples were performed using procedures of Association of

          Official Analytical Chemists (36)

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          Detection of serum malondialdehyde concentrations using HPLC

          Serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) a marker for oxidative stress (n =12) were

          measured using HPLC with an LC-20AD pump SIL-20A autosampler SPD-20A ultraviolet-

          visible spectroscopy detector (at C18-ODS-3V and 5 m with a 46 times 250 mm column) and

          CTO-10ASVP column oven (Shimadzu) as described previously (37) Tissue samples (300 L)

          were homogenized in a mixture of 200 L of HClO4 (05 M) and 100 L of 500-ppm 2[6]-di-

          tert-butyl-p-cresol Next the samples were centrifuged and supernatants were injected (injection

          volume 20 L) into an HPLC system The mobile phase was 30 mM KH2PO4-methanol (825 +

          175 vv pH 36) the flow rate was 12 mLminute and detection at 250 nm

          Western blot analysis

          Western blot analysis was performed as described previously (38) Proteins were

          extracted from ovarian tumor samples and were homogenized at 110 (w v) in 10 mM Tris-HCl

          buffer at pH 74 containing 01 mM NaCl 01 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 5 M

          soluble soybean powder (Sigma St Louis MO USA) as a trypsin inhibitor Samples underwent

          centrifugation at 15000 g at 4degC for 30 minutes for obtaining a supernatant Supernatants were

          mixed with Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 minutes Aliquots containing 20 g of

          protein were subjected to 10 sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel (PAGE)

          electrophoresis and subsequently transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher amp Schuell

          BioScience) Nitrocellulose membranes were washed twice for 5 minutes in phosphate-buffered

          saline and blocked with 1 bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 hour prior

          to application of primary antibodies Antibodies against nuclear factor (NF)-B Bcl-2 Bax p-

          mTOR p-P70S6k p-4E-Bp1 nuclear factor erythroid 2 (Nrf2) and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1)

          were diluted at 11000 in the buffer containing 005 Tween-20 and used Membranes were

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          striped and used blotted for with other antibodies All antibodies were purchased from Abcam

          (Cambridge UK)

          The nitrocellulose membrane was incubated at 4degC with antibodies overnight Western

          blots were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG

          (Abcam Cambridge UK) Specific binding was detected using diaminobenzidine and hydrogen

          peroxide as substrates Protein loading was controlled using an anti--actin antibody (Sigma)

          Samples were analyzed in quadruplicate under each experimental condition and protein levels

          were measured densitometrically using the image analysis software program ImageJ (National

          Institutes of Health)

          Statistical analysis Tumor incidences in the control and experimental groups were

          evaluated statistically using the χ2 test Data were analyzed via analysis of variance using the

          general linear model with the SAS program (2002) (SAS Institute Inc) to determine the effects

          of genistein supplementation on tumor size protein expressions and serum metabolites When a

          significant F statistic (P le 005) in the analysis of variance was noted the least squares mean

          procedure was performed to separate means that were significantly different (P lt 005) Linear

          and quadratic polynomial contrasts of the responses were used to evaluate the effects of the three

          dosages of genistein administered to the animals for serum metabolites

          RESULTS

          Genistein reduces the incidence and number of spontaneous ovarian tumors in laying hens

          To investigate the effects of genistein supplementation on the development of

          spontaneous ovarian tumors a total of 300 laying hens at age of 182 weeks was randomized to

          three groups (n = 100 per group) (i) control (301 mgday genistein) (ii) low-dose genistein

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          (5248 mghen per day) and (iii) high-dose genistein (10626 mghen per day) (Supplementary

          Figure 1) At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein the study was terminated and

          necropsy was performed for the examination of gross pathology and microscopy of the tumors

          (Figure 1 and 2) In hens revealed a significant effect of genistein on the incidence of

          spontaneous ovarian cancer (Table 2) Thirty percent of the hens in the control group developed

          ovarian tumors as reported previously (25) The incidence of ovarian cancer significantly

          decreased in both LG- and HG-treated hens (19 and 10 respectively) compared with control

          group (p = 0002) indicating that genistein acts in a dose-dependent manner Based on the

          histopathological assessment of the tumors two subtypes of ovarian cancer including serous and

          mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens representative images are illustrated in Figure

          2B-C The histopathology grading system based on mitotic developments and cellular

          differentiation is illustrated in Table 1 for the ovary There is no a significantly lower incidence

          of adenocarcinoma in birds receiving genistein compared to the control birds (p gt 005) In the

          control group 63 of tumor-bearing hens developed serous carcinoma whereas 37 of them

          had mucinous carcinoma However there was no significant difference in the incidence of each

          subtype of ovarian tumors between control and treatment groups (Table 2)

          Additionally genistein treatment significantly reduced both the number and size of

          ovarian tumors compared to the control group (Table 2) Hens in the control group had an

          average of 37100 tumors (37 tumors in total number of animals 100) whereas low- and high

          genistein-treated hens had 19100 and 10100 tumors respectively Average sizes of the tumors

          were 281 109 and 047 mm in the control LG and HG groups respectively (p = 00001)

          At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein we also observed that overall

          survival rates in genistein groups were higher compared to that of control group although the

          differences were not statistically significant (Table 2) In control group 83 of the hens stayed

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          alive until the end of the experiment while 88 and 91 of the animals were alive in the LG and

          HG groups respectively

          Genistein supplementation results in enhanced genistein levels in serum and reduced MDA

          in the ovary of laying hens

          To demonstrate that the lower ovarian cancer incidence in the treatment groups was

          specifically due to the genistein intervention we measured serum levels of genistein and

          daidzein in 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3A-B) As expected hens treated with low or

          high genistein fed groups had significantly higher serum genistein levels (25183 nmoll and

          35800 nmoll respectively) compared with the control animals (14875 nmoll) (p lt 005) and

          the increase in the level of serum genistein was dose-dependent However genistein

          supplementation had no effect on serum level of daidzein in any of the treatment groups (Figure

          3B)

          Several studies have shown that oxidative stress is involved in a wide variety of cancers

          including ovarian cancer (35) To determine the effects of genistein on the hen ovary in the

          context of oxidative stress we analyzed the levels of MDA which is a widely used marker of

          oxidative stress in the ovaries of 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3C) Our data showed

          that treatment of hens with genistein significantly and dose-dependently decreased the level of

          MDA in the ovary (p lt 005) The average level of ovarian MDA was 304 nmolmg in the

          control group while it was 199 nmolmg and 121 nmolmg in low- and high genistein-fed

          groups respectively These results confirm that genistein treatment could ameliorate oxidative

          stress in the hen ovary

          Genistein decreases the expression of NF-κB and Bcl-2 while increasing the expression of

          Bax in the ovary of laying hens

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          To characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the genistein-induced changes in

          the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer we first examined the effect of genistein on the nuclear

          factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway which has been shown as one of the key survival

          pathways activated by oxidative stress (40) As illustrated in Figure 4A both low and high

          genistein treatments significantly reduced the protein expression level of NF-κB indicating that

          genistein mediates its anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer through NF-κB signaling pathway In

          addition the expression levels of pro-survival Bcl-2 and pro-apoptotic Bax which are

          transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB were also analyzed (Figure 4B-C) Our findings showed

          that genistein significantly downregulates Bcl-2 whereas significantly upregulates Bax leading

          to a reduced ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax and consequently inducing apoptosis

          Genistein suppresses the mTOR pathway in the ovary of laying hens

          To further explore the mechanisms involved in the genistein-induced changes in the

          ovarian carcinogenesis we studied the effects of genistein on the mammalian target of

          rapamycin (mTOR) survival signaling which has also been shown to be associated with

          oxidative stress (41) mTOR which is a downstream target of AKT is a SerThr kinase that

          phosphorylates p70S6K and 4EBP1 (42) As shown in Figure 5A-C treatment of hens with low

          or high genistein significantly decreased the levels of phosphorylated proteins of mTOR

          p70S6K and 4EBP1 leading to the inactivation of the mTOR signal transduction These data

          demonstrate that mTOR signaling pathway also participates in the genistein-induced responses in

          ovarian cancer cells

          Genistein upregulates Nrf2 and HO-1 in the ovary of laying hens

          It is well established that activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is

          one of the major mechanisms in the cellular defense against oxidative stress (43) Similar to

          Nrf2 its downstream protein HO-1 has also a protective effect against oxidative stress (44) As

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          illustrated in Figure 6A-B significantly increased levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were observed in the

          genistein-treated groups indicating that genistein exerts its chemopreventive effect on the ovary

          by activating the Nrf2-induced cellular stress responses

          DISCUSSION

          Although surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions have improved the overall survival

          rates effective treatment of ovarian cancer is limited due to the major challenges such as

          clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity lack of early detection strategies for the disease

          tumor recurrence and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (6-8 45) Therefore

          chemoprevention of ovarian cancer by non-toxic naturally occurring or synthetic agents

          provides a rational approach to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer

          Epidemiological studies have shown that the dietary intake of soybean is associated with reduced

          risks of various types of cancer including ovarian cancer (46) Genistein the most abundant

          isoflavone in soybean has been reported to play a key role in the prevention of ovarian cancer

          (17-23) Although numerous epidemiological and in vitro studies have demonstrated that

          genistein is an effective anti-tumor agent in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer there is a

          lack of well-characterized studies that address the efficacy and mechanisms of action of genistein

          in a biologically relevant in vivo model of spontaneous ovarian carcinogenesis In the present

          study therefore we utilized the laying hen model to prospectively test the chemopreventive

          effects of genistein on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer and to further investigate the

          molecular mechanisms underlying the actions of genistein on the initiation and progression of

          ovarian cancer

          Laying hens have been shown to develop spontaneous ovarian cancer at a high rate

          providing an appropriate natural experimental model of human ovarian cancer (25) The fact that

          laying hens and humans share some similarities in reproductive physiology and hens have also

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

          induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

          classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

          humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

          observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

          cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

          factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

          antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

          Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

          identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

          the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

          been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

          contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

          To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

          chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

          study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

          intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

          demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

          ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

          addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

          was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

          ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

          prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

          hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

          of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

          genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

          that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

          It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

          associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

          first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

          control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

          a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

          exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

          Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

          inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

          which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

          NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

          known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

          Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

          cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

          Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

          κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

          adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

          including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

          suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

          significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

          the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

          ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

          factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

          protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

          activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

          activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

          kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

          resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

          motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

          that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

          and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

          that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

          PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

          Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

          protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

          cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

          associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

          proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

          Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

          allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

          (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

          activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

          associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

          demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

          master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

          Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

          prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

          Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

          expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

          involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

          In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

          that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

          modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

          and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

          biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

          protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

          improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          REFERENCES

          1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

          2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

          Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

          characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

          221709-1721

          3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

          Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

          Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

          subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

          2008 145198-5208

          4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

          carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

          5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

          6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

          G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

          7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

          J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

          8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

          7573-584

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

          reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

          10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

          gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

          1161697-1705

          11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

          Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

          Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

          12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

          H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

          Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

          cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

          13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

          Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

          apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

          14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

          Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

          pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

          to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

          15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

          16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

          Ljunggren

          J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

          beta

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

          17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

          estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

          18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

          Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

          growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

          261193-204

          19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

          human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

          20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

          arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

          pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

          21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

          induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

          2007 10523-30

          22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

          ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

          23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

          Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

          24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

          Cancer 2003 13405-12

          25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

          Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

          preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

          27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

          chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

          28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

          spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

          29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

          Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

          adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

          2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

          30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

          Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

          preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

          81373-379

          31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

          egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

          32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

          dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

          33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

          cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

          34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

          of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

          isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

          2010621001-1005

          36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

          Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

          37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

          human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

          38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

          antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

          2016951088-95

          39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

          mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

          cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

          40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

          fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

          41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

          autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

          Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

          42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

          1945

          43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

          Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

          induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

          Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

          culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

          45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

          46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

          KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

          future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

          47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

          of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

          48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

          CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

          112171-178

          49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

          proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

          50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

          ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

          51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

          hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

          52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

          pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

          53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

          54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

          kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

          cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

          18334-342

          56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

          SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

          convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

          57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

          Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

          NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

          58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

          cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

          59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

          Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

          Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

          cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

          60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

          149274-293

          61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

          electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

          62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

          in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

          63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

          6636-44

          64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

          Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

          analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

          65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

          epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

          2012 271918-1924

          66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

          AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

          cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

          67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

          Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

          68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

          with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

          69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

          tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

          Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

          Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

          Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

          common classification

          Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

          pattern present but not distinct

          Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

          common classification

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

          Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

          X2 301 5248 10626

          Tumor ()

          Incidence

          Reduction

          30100

          30

          -

          19100

          19

          -367

          10100

          10

          -667

          0002

          X2=12701

          Serous carcinoma ()

          Incidence

          Reduction

          19100

          19

          -

          11100

          11

          -421

          6100

          6

          -684

          0017

          X2=8144

          Mucinous carcinoma ()

          Incidence

          Reduction

          11100

          11

          -

          8100

          8

          -273

          4100

          4

          -636

          0175

          X2=3485

          Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

          Grade 1 530

          167

          719

          368

          510

          500

          0084

          X2=4943

          Grade 2 1830

          600

          819

          421

          310

          300

          0196

          X2=3258

          Grade 3 730

          233

          419

          211

          210

          200

          0968

          X2=0064

          Number of tumors1 37100

          19100 10100 00001

          Sizehen mm1

          281plusmn050a

          109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

          b 00001

          Sizehen with tumors only

          mm1

          686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

          Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

          Survival () 83100

          83

          88100

          88

          91100

          91

          0228

          X2=2953

          1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

          superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          FIGURE LEGENDS

          Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

          ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

          Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

          Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

          original magnification x40

          Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

          daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

          a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

          Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

          expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

          blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

          same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

          Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

          C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

          representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

          percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

          significantly ( P lt 005)

          Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

          tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

          same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          Figure 1 Cancer Research

          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          Figure 2 Cancer Research

          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          301 5248 10626

          0

          100

          200

          300

          400

          500

          c

          b

          a

          A

          Genistein levels mghen per day

          Gen

          iste

          in n

          mo

          ll

          301 5248 10626

          0

          20

          40

          60

          80

          B

          Genistein levels mghen per day

          Dai

          dze

          in n

          mo

          ll

          301 5248 10626

          0

          1

          2

          3

          4a

          b

          c

          C

          Genistein levels mghen per day

          Ova

          ry M

          DA

          n

          mo

          lm

          g p

          rote

          in

          Figure 3 Cancer Research

          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          Figure 4 Cancer Research

          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          301 5248 10626

          0

          50

          100

          150

          a

          b

          c

          A

          -actin

          p-mTOR

          Genistein levels mghen per day

          p-m

          TO

          R

          pe

          rce

          nt

          of

          co

          ntr

          ol

          301 5248 10626

          0

          50

          100

          150

          a

          b

          c

          B

          -actin

          p-p70S6K1

          Genistein levels mghen per day

          p-p

          70

          S6

          K1

          p

          erc

          en

          t o

          f co

          ntr

          ol

          301 5248 10626

          0

          50

          100

          150

          a

          b

          c

          C

          -actin

          p-4E-BP1

          Genistein levels mghen per day

          p-4

          E-B

          P1

          p

          erc

          en

          t o

          f co

          ntr

          ol

          Figure 5 Cancer Research

          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          301 5248 10626

          0

          50

          100

          150

          200

          250

          c

          b

          a

          A

          -actin

          Nrf2

          Genistein levels mghen per day

          Nrf

          2

          pe

          rce

          nt

          of

          co

          ntr

          ol

          301 5248 10626

          0

          50

          100

          150

          200

          250

          c

          b

          a

          B

          -actin

          HO-1

          Genistein levels mghen per day

          HO

          -1 p

          erc

          en

          t o

          f co

          ntr

          ol

          Figure 6 Cancer Research

          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

          Updated version

          1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

          Access the most recent version of this article at

          Material

          Supplementary

          89DC1

          httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

          Manuscript

          Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

          E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

          Subscriptions

          Reprints and

          pubsaacrorgDepartment at

          To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

          Permissions

          Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

          89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

          • Article File
          • Figure 1
          • Figure 2
          • Figures 3-6

            for histology and embedded in paraffin Tissue blocks were used to prepare sections (6 m)

            were cut The slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HampE) and were evaluated based

            on the histopathology classification system listed in Table 1 (26 33 34)

            Analysis of serum levels of Genistein by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)

            At the end of the study blood samples were collected from 12 birds randomly chosen

            from each treatment group Blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min and sera were

            collected Sera samples were kept on the ice and protected from light until they were processed

            to prevent any artifactual oxidation during the experiments Samples were stored at ndash80C until

            analysis Serum genistein and daidzein concentrations were measured by high-performance

            liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Shimadzu Tokyo Japan) using Shimadzu fluorescence RF-10

            AxL detector and C18minus ODS-3 5microm 46 times 250 mm column The serum isoflavone (genistein

            and daidzein) levels were measured by the method of our previous study (35) To 200 microl of

            serum were added 200 microl of b-glucuronidase type H-5 solution (Sigma Chemical St Louis MO)

            in 02 M sodium acetate buffer pH 50 (3500 units of b-glucuronidase and 193 units of

            sulfatase) The mixture was incubated at 37C in a shaking water bath for 2 h and then treated

            with 3600 microl of methanolacetic acid (955 volvol) The mixture was vortexed for 30 s

            sonicated for 30 s vortexed again for 30 s and centrifuged for 15 min at 4C and 800 g The

            supernatants were evaporated We then dissolved the sample with 80 methanol at the same

            volume of serum Elution was performed at a flow rate of 1 mlmin using the following linear

            gradient methanolacetic acid (955 volvol A) wateracetic acid (955 volvol B) and A (by

            vol) at 30 for 10 min from 30 to 70 in 35 min and from 70 to 30 in 5 min (35)

            Chemical analyses of the diet samples were performed using procedures of Association of

            Official Analytical Chemists (36)

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            Detection of serum malondialdehyde concentrations using HPLC

            Serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) a marker for oxidative stress (n =12) were

            measured using HPLC with an LC-20AD pump SIL-20A autosampler SPD-20A ultraviolet-

            visible spectroscopy detector (at C18-ODS-3V and 5 m with a 46 times 250 mm column) and

            CTO-10ASVP column oven (Shimadzu) as described previously (37) Tissue samples (300 L)

            were homogenized in a mixture of 200 L of HClO4 (05 M) and 100 L of 500-ppm 2[6]-di-

            tert-butyl-p-cresol Next the samples were centrifuged and supernatants were injected (injection

            volume 20 L) into an HPLC system The mobile phase was 30 mM KH2PO4-methanol (825 +

            175 vv pH 36) the flow rate was 12 mLminute and detection at 250 nm

            Western blot analysis

            Western blot analysis was performed as described previously (38) Proteins were

            extracted from ovarian tumor samples and were homogenized at 110 (w v) in 10 mM Tris-HCl

            buffer at pH 74 containing 01 mM NaCl 01 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 5 M

            soluble soybean powder (Sigma St Louis MO USA) as a trypsin inhibitor Samples underwent

            centrifugation at 15000 g at 4degC for 30 minutes for obtaining a supernatant Supernatants were

            mixed with Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 minutes Aliquots containing 20 g of

            protein were subjected to 10 sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel (PAGE)

            electrophoresis and subsequently transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher amp Schuell

            BioScience) Nitrocellulose membranes were washed twice for 5 minutes in phosphate-buffered

            saline and blocked with 1 bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 hour prior

            to application of primary antibodies Antibodies against nuclear factor (NF)-B Bcl-2 Bax p-

            mTOR p-P70S6k p-4E-Bp1 nuclear factor erythroid 2 (Nrf2) and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1)

            were diluted at 11000 in the buffer containing 005 Tween-20 and used Membranes were

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            striped and used blotted for with other antibodies All antibodies were purchased from Abcam

            (Cambridge UK)

            The nitrocellulose membrane was incubated at 4degC with antibodies overnight Western

            blots were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG

            (Abcam Cambridge UK) Specific binding was detected using diaminobenzidine and hydrogen

            peroxide as substrates Protein loading was controlled using an anti--actin antibody (Sigma)

            Samples were analyzed in quadruplicate under each experimental condition and protein levels

            were measured densitometrically using the image analysis software program ImageJ (National

            Institutes of Health)

            Statistical analysis Tumor incidences in the control and experimental groups were

            evaluated statistically using the χ2 test Data were analyzed via analysis of variance using the

            general linear model with the SAS program (2002) (SAS Institute Inc) to determine the effects

            of genistein supplementation on tumor size protein expressions and serum metabolites When a

            significant F statistic (P le 005) in the analysis of variance was noted the least squares mean

            procedure was performed to separate means that were significantly different (P lt 005) Linear

            and quadratic polynomial contrasts of the responses were used to evaluate the effects of the three

            dosages of genistein administered to the animals for serum metabolites

            RESULTS

            Genistein reduces the incidence and number of spontaneous ovarian tumors in laying hens

            To investigate the effects of genistein supplementation on the development of

            spontaneous ovarian tumors a total of 300 laying hens at age of 182 weeks was randomized to

            three groups (n = 100 per group) (i) control (301 mgday genistein) (ii) low-dose genistein

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            (5248 mghen per day) and (iii) high-dose genistein (10626 mghen per day) (Supplementary

            Figure 1) At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein the study was terminated and

            necropsy was performed for the examination of gross pathology and microscopy of the tumors

            (Figure 1 and 2) In hens revealed a significant effect of genistein on the incidence of

            spontaneous ovarian cancer (Table 2) Thirty percent of the hens in the control group developed

            ovarian tumors as reported previously (25) The incidence of ovarian cancer significantly

            decreased in both LG- and HG-treated hens (19 and 10 respectively) compared with control

            group (p = 0002) indicating that genistein acts in a dose-dependent manner Based on the

            histopathological assessment of the tumors two subtypes of ovarian cancer including serous and

            mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens representative images are illustrated in Figure

            2B-C The histopathology grading system based on mitotic developments and cellular

            differentiation is illustrated in Table 1 for the ovary There is no a significantly lower incidence

            of adenocarcinoma in birds receiving genistein compared to the control birds (p gt 005) In the

            control group 63 of tumor-bearing hens developed serous carcinoma whereas 37 of them

            had mucinous carcinoma However there was no significant difference in the incidence of each

            subtype of ovarian tumors between control and treatment groups (Table 2)

            Additionally genistein treatment significantly reduced both the number and size of

            ovarian tumors compared to the control group (Table 2) Hens in the control group had an

            average of 37100 tumors (37 tumors in total number of animals 100) whereas low- and high

            genistein-treated hens had 19100 and 10100 tumors respectively Average sizes of the tumors

            were 281 109 and 047 mm in the control LG and HG groups respectively (p = 00001)

            At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein we also observed that overall

            survival rates in genistein groups were higher compared to that of control group although the

            differences were not statistically significant (Table 2) In control group 83 of the hens stayed

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            alive until the end of the experiment while 88 and 91 of the animals were alive in the LG and

            HG groups respectively

            Genistein supplementation results in enhanced genistein levels in serum and reduced MDA

            in the ovary of laying hens

            To demonstrate that the lower ovarian cancer incidence in the treatment groups was

            specifically due to the genistein intervention we measured serum levels of genistein and

            daidzein in 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3A-B) As expected hens treated with low or

            high genistein fed groups had significantly higher serum genistein levels (25183 nmoll and

            35800 nmoll respectively) compared with the control animals (14875 nmoll) (p lt 005) and

            the increase in the level of serum genistein was dose-dependent However genistein

            supplementation had no effect on serum level of daidzein in any of the treatment groups (Figure

            3B)

            Several studies have shown that oxidative stress is involved in a wide variety of cancers

            including ovarian cancer (35) To determine the effects of genistein on the hen ovary in the

            context of oxidative stress we analyzed the levels of MDA which is a widely used marker of

            oxidative stress in the ovaries of 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3C) Our data showed

            that treatment of hens with genistein significantly and dose-dependently decreased the level of

            MDA in the ovary (p lt 005) The average level of ovarian MDA was 304 nmolmg in the

            control group while it was 199 nmolmg and 121 nmolmg in low- and high genistein-fed

            groups respectively These results confirm that genistein treatment could ameliorate oxidative

            stress in the hen ovary

            Genistein decreases the expression of NF-κB and Bcl-2 while increasing the expression of

            Bax in the ovary of laying hens

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            To characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the genistein-induced changes in

            the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer we first examined the effect of genistein on the nuclear

            factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway which has been shown as one of the key survival

            pathways activated by oxidative stress (40) As illustrated in Figure 4A both low and high

            genistein treatments significantly reduced the protein expression level of NF-κB indicating that

            genistein mediates its anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer through NF-κB signaling pathway In

            addition the expression levels of pro-survival Bcl-2 and pro-apoptotic Bax which are

            transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB were also analyzed (Figure 4B-C) Our findings showed

            that genistein significantly downregulates Bcl-2 whereas significantly upregulates Bax leading

            to a reduced ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax and consequently inducing apoptosis

            Genistein suppresses the mTOR pathway in the ovary of laying hens

            To further explore the mechanisms involved in the genistein-induced changes in the

            ovarian carcinogenesis we studied the effects of genistein on the mammalian target of

            rapamycin (mTOR) survival signaling which has also been shown to be associated with

            oxidative stress (41) mTOR which is a downstream target of AKT is a SerThr kinase that

            phosphorylates p70S6K and 4EBP1 (42) As shown in Figure 5A-C treatment of hens with low

            or high genistein significantly decreased the levels of phosphorylated proteins of mTOR

            p70S6K and 4EBP1 leading to the inactivation of the mTOR signal transduction These data

            demonstrate that mTOR signaling pathway also participates in the genistein-induced responses in

            ovarian cancer cells

            Genistein upregulates Nrf2 and HO-1 in the ovary of laying hens

            It is well established that activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is

            one of the major mechanisms in the cellular defense against oxidative stress (43) Similar to

            Nrf2 its downstream protein HO-1 has also a protective effect against oxidative stress (44) As

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            illustrated in Figure 6A-B significantly increased levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were observed in the

            genistein-treated groups indicating that genistein exerts its chemopreventive effect on the ovary

            by activating the Nrf2-induced cellular stress responses

            DISCUSSION

            Although surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions have improved the overall survival

            rates effective treatment of ovarian cancer is limited due to the major challenges such as

            clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity lack of early detection strategies for the disease

            tumor recurrence and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (6-8 45) Therefore

            chemoprevention of ovarian cancer by non-toxic naturally occurring or synthetic agents

            provides a rational approach to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer

            Epidemiological studies have shown that the dietary intake of soybean is associated with reduced

            risks of various types of cancer including ovarian cancer (46) Genistein the most abundant

            isoflavone in soybean has been reported to play a key role in the prevention of ovarian cancer

            (17-23) Although numerous epidemiological and in vitro studies have demonstrated that

            genistein is an effective anti-tumor agent in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer there is a

            lack of well-characterized studies that address the efficacy and mechanisms of action of genistein

            in a biologically relevant in vivo model of spontaneous ovarian carcinogenesis In the present

            study therefore we utilized the laying hen model to prospectively test the chemopreventive

            effects of genistein on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer and to further investigate the

            molecular mechanisms underlying the actions of genistein on the initiation and progression of

            ovarian cancer

            Laying hens have been shown to develop spontaneous ovarian cancer at a high rate

            providing an appropriate natural experimental model of human ovarian cancer (25) The fact that

            laying hens and humans share some similarities in reproductive physiology and hens have also

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

            induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

            classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

            humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

            observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

            cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

            factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

            antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

            Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

            identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

            the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

            been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

            contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

            To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

            chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

            study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

            intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

            demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

            ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

            addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

            was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

            ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

            prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

            hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

            of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

            genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

            that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

            It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

            associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

            first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

            control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

            a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

            exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

            Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

            inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

            which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

            NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

            known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

            Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

            cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

            Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

            κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

            adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

            including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

            suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

            significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

            the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

            ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

            factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

            protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

            activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

            activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

            kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

            resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

            motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

            that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

            and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

            that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

            PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

            Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

            protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

            cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

            associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

            proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

            Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

            allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

            (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

            activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

            associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

            demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

            master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

            Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

            prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

            Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

            expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

            involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

            In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

            that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

            modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

            and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

            biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

            protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

            improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            REFERENCES

            1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

            2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

            Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

            characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

            221709-1721

            3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

            Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

            Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

            subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

            2008 145198-5208

            4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

            carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

            5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

            6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

            G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

            7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

            J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

            8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

            7573-584

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

            reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

            10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

            gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

            1161697-1705

            11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

            Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

            Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

            12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

            H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

            Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

            cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

            13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

            Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

            apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

            14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

            Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

            pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

            to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

            15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

            16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

            Ljunggren

            J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

            beta

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

            17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

            estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

            18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

            Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

            growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

            261193-204

            19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

            human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

            20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

            arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

            pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

            21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

            induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

            2007 10523-30

            22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

            ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

            23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

            Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

            24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

            Cancer 2003 13405-12

            25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

            Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

            preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

            27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

            chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

            28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

            spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

            29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

            Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

            adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

            2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

            30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

            Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

            preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

            81373-379

            31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

            egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

            32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

            dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

            33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

            cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

            34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

            of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

            isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

            2010621001-1005

            36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

            Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

            37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

            human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

            38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

            antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

            2016951088-95

            39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

            mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

            cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

            40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

            fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

            41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

            autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

            Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

            42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

            1945

            43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

            Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

            induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

            Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

            culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

            45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

            46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

            KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

            future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

            47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

            of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

            48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

            CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

            112171-178

            49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

            proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

            50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

            ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

            51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

            hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

            52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

            pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

            53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

            54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

            kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

            cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

            18334-342

            56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

            SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

            convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

            57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

            Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

            NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

            58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

            cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

            59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

            Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

            Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

            cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

            60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

            149274-293

            61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

            electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

            62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

            in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

            63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

            6636-44

            64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

            Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

            analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

            65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

            epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

            2012 271918-1924

            66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

            AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

            cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

            67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

            Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

            68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

            with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

            69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

            tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

            Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

            Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

            Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

            common classification

            Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

            pattern present but not distinct

            Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

            common classification

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

            Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

            X2 301 5248 10626

            Tumor ()

            Incidence

            Reduction

            30100

            30

            -

            19100

            19

            -367

            10100

            10

            -667

            0002

            X2=12701

            Serous carcinoma ()

            Incidence

            Reduction

            19100

            19

            -

            11100

            11

            -421

            6100

            6

            -684

            0017

            X2=8144

            Mucinous carcinoma ()

            Incidence

            Reduction

            11100

            11

            -

            8100

            8

            -273

            4100

            4

            -636

            0175

            X2=3485

            Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

            Grade 1 530

            167

            719

            368

            510

            500

            0084

            X2=4943

            Grade 2 1830

            600

            819

            421

            310

            300

            0196

            X2=3258

            Grade 3 730

            233

            419

            211

            210

            200

            0968

            X2=0064

            Number of tumors1 37100

            19100 10100 00001

            Sizehen mm1

            281plusmn050a

            109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

            b 00001

            Sizehen with tumors only

            mm1

            686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

            Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

            Survival () 83100

            83

            88100

            88

            91100

            91

            0228

            X2=2953

            1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

            superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            FIGURE LEGENDS

            Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

            ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

            Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

            Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

            original magnification x40

            Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

            daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

            a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

            Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

            expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

            blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

            same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

            Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

            C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

            representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

            percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

            significantly ( P lt 005)

            Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

            tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

            same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            Figure 1 Cancer Research

            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            Figure 2 Cancer Research

            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            301 5248 10626

            0

            100

            200

            300

            400

            500

            c

            b

            a

            A

            Genistein levels mghen per day

            Gen

            iste

            in n

            mo

            ll

            301 5248 10626

            0

            20

            40

            60

            80

            B

            Genistein levels mghen per day

            Dai

            dze

            in n

            mo

            ll

            301 5248 10626

            0

            1

            2

            3

            4a

            b

            c

            C

            Genistein levels mghen per day

            Ova

            ry M

            DA

            n

            mo

            lm

            g p

            rote

            in

            Figure 3 Cancer Research

            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            Figure 4 Cancer Research

            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            301 5248 10626

            0

            50

            100

            150

            a

            b

            c

            A

            -actin

            p-mTOR

            Genistein levels mghen per day

            p-m

            TO

            R

            pe

            rce

            nt

            of

            co

            ntr

            ol

            301 5248 10626

            0

            50

            100

            150

            a

            b

            c

            B

            -actin

            p-p70S6K1

            Genistein levels mghen per day

            p-p

            70

            S6

            K1

            p

            erc

            en

            t o

            f co

            ntr

            ol

            301 5248 10626

            0

            50

            100

            150

            a

            b

            c

            C

            -actin

            p-4E-BP1

            Genistein levels mghen per day

            p-4

            E-B

            P1

            p

            erc

            en

            t o

            f co

            ntr

            ol

            Figure 5 Cancer Research

            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            301 5248 10626

            0

            50

            100

            150

            200

            250

            c

            b

            a

            A

            -actin

            Nrf2

            Genistein levels mghen per day

            Nrf

            2

            pe

            rce

            nt

            of

            co

            ntr

            ol

            301 5248 10626

            0

            50

            100

            150

            200

            250

            c

            b

            a

            B

            -actin

            HO-1

            Genistein levels mghen per day

            HO

            -1 p

            erc

            en

            t o

            f co

            ntr

            ol

            Figure 6 Cancer Research

            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

            Updated version

            1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

            Access the most recent version of this article at

            Material

            Supplementary

            89DC1

            httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

            Manuscript

            Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

            E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

            Subscriptions

            Reprints and

            pubsaacrorgDepartment at

            To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

            Permissions

            Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

            89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

            • Article File
            • Figure 1
            • Figure 2
            • Figures 3-6

              Detection of serum malondialdehyde concentrations using HPLC

              Serum levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) a marker for oxidative stress (n =12) were

              measured using HPLC with an LC-20AD pump SIL-20A autosampler SPD-20A ultraviolet-

              visible spectroscopy detector (at C18-ODS-3V and 5 m with a 46 times 250 mm column) and

              CTO-10ASVP column oven (Shimadzu) as described previously (37) Tissue samples (300 L)

              were homogenized in a mixture of 200 L of HClO4 (05 M) and 100 L of 500-ppm 2[6]-di-

              tert-butyl-p-cresol Next the samples were centrifuged and supernatants were injected (injection

              volume 20 L) into an HPLC system The mobile phase was 30 mM KH2PO4-methanol (825 +

              175 vv pH 36) the flow rate was 12 mLminute and detection at 250 nm

              Western blot analysis

              Western blot analysis was performed as described previously (38) Proteins were

              extracted from ovarian tumor samples and were homogenized at 110 (w v) in 10 mM Tris-HCl

              buffer at pH 74 containing 01 mM NaCl 01 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 5 M

              soluble soybean powder (Sigma St Louis MO USA) as a trypsin inhibitor Samples underwent

              centrifugation at 15000 g at 4degC for 30 minutes for obtaining a supernatant Supernatants were

              mixed with Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 minutes Aliquots containing 20 g of

              protein were subjected to 10 sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel (PAGE)

              electrophoresis and subsequently transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher amp Schuell

              BioScience) Nitrocellulose membranes were washed twice for 5 minutes in phosphate-buffered

              saline and blocked with 1 bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 hour prior

              to application of primary antibodies Antibodies against nuclear factor (NF)-B Bcl-2 Bax p-

              mTOR p-P70S6k p-4E-Bp1 nuclear factor erythroid 2 (Nrf2) and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1)

              were diluted at 11000 in the buffer containing 005 Tween-20 and used Membranes were

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              striped and used blotted for with other antibodies All antibodies were purchased from Abcam

              (Cambridge UK)

              The nitrocellulose membrane was incubated at 4degC with antibodies overnight Western

              blots were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG

              (Abcam Cambridge UK) Specific binding was detected using diaminobenzidine and hydrogen

              peroxide as substrates Protein loading was controlled using an anti--actin antibody (Sigma)

              Samples were analyzed in quadruplicate under each experimental condition and protein levels

              were measured densitometrically using the image analysis software program ImageJ (National

              Institutes of Health)

              Statistical analysis Tumor incidences in the control and experimental groups were

              evaluated statistically using the χ2 test Data were analyzed via analysis of variance using the

              general linear model with the SAS program (2002) (SAS Institute Inc) to determine the effects

              of genistein supplementation on tumor size protein expressions and serum metabolites When a

              significant F statistic (P le 005) in the analysis of variance was noted the least squares mean

              procedure was performed to separate means that were significantly different (P lt 005) Linear

              and quadratic polynomial contrasts of the responses were used to evaluate the effects of the three

              dosages of genistein administered to the animals for serum metabolites

              RESULTS

              Genistein reduces the incidence and number of spontaneous ovarian tumors in laying hens

              To investigate the effects of genistein supplementation on the development of

              spontaneous ovarian tumors a total of 300 laying hens at age of 182 weeks was randomized to

              three groups (n = 100 per group) (i) control (301 mgday genistein) (ii) low-dose genistein

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              (5248 mghen per day) and (iii) high-dose genistein (10626 mghen per day) (Supplementary

              Figure 1) At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein the study was terminated and

              necropsy was performed for the examination of gross pathology and microscopy of the tumors

              (Figure 1 and 2) In hens revealed a significant effect of genistein on the incidence of

              spontaneous ovarian cancer (Table 2) Thirty percent of the hens in the control group developed

              ovarian tumors as reported previously (25) The incidence of ovarian cancer significantly

              decreased in both LG- and HG-treated hens (19 and 10 respectively) compared with control

              group (p = 0002) indicating that genistein acts in a dose-dependent manner Based on the

              histopathological assessment of the tumors two subtypes of ovarian cancer including serous and

              mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens representative images are illustrated in Figure

              2B-C The histopathology grading system based on mitotic developments and cellular

              differentiation is illustrated in Table 1 for the ovary There is no a significantly lower incidence

              of adenocarcinoma in birds receiving genistein compared to the control birds (p gt 005) In the

              control group 63 of tumor-bearing hens developed serous carcinoma whereas 37 of them

              had mucinous carcinoma However there was no significant difference in the incidence of each

              subtype of ovarian tumors between control and treatment groups (Table 2)

              Additionally genistein treatment significantly reduced both the number and size of

              ovarian tumors compared to the control group (Table 2) Hens in the control group had an

              average of 37100 tumors (37 tumors in total number of animals 100) whereas low- and high

              genistein-treated hens had 19100 and 10100 tumors respectively Average sizes of the tumors

              were 281 109 and 047 mm in the control LG and HG groups respectively (p = 00001)

              At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein we also observed that overall

              survival rates in genistein groups were higher compared to that of control group although the

              differences were not statistically significant (Table 2) In control group 83 of the hens stayed

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              alive until the end of the experiment while 88 and 91 of the animals were alive in the LG and

              HG groups respectively

              Genistein supplementation results in enhanced genistein levels in serum and reduced MDA

              in the ovary of laying hens

              To demonstrate that the lower ovarian cancer incidence in the treatment groups was

              specifically due to the genistein intervention we measured serum levels of genistein and

              daidzein in 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3A-B) As expected hens treated with low or

              high genistein fed groups had significantly higher serum genistein levels (25183 nmoll and

              35800 nmoll respectively) compared with the control animals (14875 nmoll) (p lt 005) and

              the increase in the level of serum genistein was dose-dependent However genistein

              supplementation had no effect on serum level of daidzein in any of the treatment groups (Figure

              3B)

              Several studies have shown that oxidative stress is involved in a wide variety of cancers

              including ovarian cancer (35) To determine the effects of genistein on the hen ovary in the

              context of oxidative stress we analyzed the levels of MDA which is a widely used marker of

              oxidative stress in the ovaries of 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3C) Our data showed

              that treatment of hens with genistein significantly and dose-dependently decreased the level of

              MDA in the ovary (p lt 005) The average level of ovarian MDA was 304 nmolmg in the

              control group while it was 199 nmolmg and 121 nmolmg in low- and high genistein-fed

              groups respectively These results confirm that genistein treatment could ameliorate oxidative

              stress in the hen ovary

              Genistein decreases the expression of NF-κB and Bcl-2 while increasing the expression of

              Bax in the ovary of laying hens

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              To characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the genistein-induced changes in

              the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer we first examined the effect of genistein on the nuclear

              factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway which has been shown as one of the key survival

              pathways activated by oxidative stress (40) As illustrated in Figure 4A both low and high

              genistein treatments significantly reduced the protein expression level of NF-κB indicating that

              genistein mediates its anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer through NF-κB signaling pathway In

              addition the expression levels of pro-survival Bcl-2 and pro-apoptotic Bax which are

              transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB were also analyzed (Figure 4B-C) Our findings showed

              that genistein significantly downregulates Bcl-2 whereas significantly upregulates Bax leading

              to a reduced ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax and consequently inducing apoptosis

              Genistein suppresses the mTOR pathway in the ovary of laying hens

              To further explore the mechanisms involved in the genistein-induced changes in the

              ovarian carcinogenesis we studied the effects of genistein on the mammalian target of

              rapamycin (mTOR) survival signaling which has also been shown to be associated with

              oxidative stress (41) mTOR which is a downstream target of AKT is a SerThr kinase that

              phosphorylates p70S6K and 4EBP1 (42) As shown in Figure 5A-C treatment of hens with low

              or high genistein significantly decreased the levels of phosphorylated proteins of mTOR

              p70S6K and 4EBP1 leading to the inactivation of the mTOR signal transduction These data

              demonstrate that mTOR signaling pathway also participates in the genistein-induced responses in

              ovarian cancer cells

              Genistein upregulates Nrf2 and HO-1 in the ovary of laying hens

              It is well established that activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is

              one of the major mechanisms in the cellular defense against oxidative stress (43) Similar to

              Nrf2 its downstream protein HO-1 has also a protective effect against oxidative stress (44) As

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              illustrated in Figure 6A-B significantly increased levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were observed in the

              genistein-treated groups indicating that genistein exerts its chemopreventive effect on the ovary

              by activating the Nrf2-induced cellular stress responses

              DISCUSSION

              Although surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions have improved the overall survival

              rates effective treatment of ovarian cancer is limited due to the major challenges such as

              clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity lack of early detection strategies for the disease

              tumor recurrence and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (6-8 45) Therefore

              chemoprevention of ovarian cancer by non-toxic naturally occurring or synthetic agents

              provides a rational approach to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer

              Epidemiological studies have shown that the dietary intake of soybean is associated with reduced

              risks of various types of cancer including ovarian cancer (46) Genistein the most abundant

              isoflavone in soybean has been reported to play a key role in the prevention of ovarian cancer

              (17-23) Although numerous epidemiological and in vitro studies have demonstrated that

              genistein is an effective anti-tumor agent in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer there is a

              lack of well-characterized studies that address the efficacy and mechanisms of action of genistein

              in a biologically relevant in vivo model of spontaneous ovarian carcinogenesis In the present

              study therefore we utilized the laying hen model to prospectively test the chemopreventive

              effects of genistein on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer and to further investigate the

              molecular mechanisms underlying the actions of genistein on the initiation and progression of

              ovarian cancer

              Laying hens have been shown to develop spontaneous ovarian cancer at a high rate

              providing an appropriate natural experimental model of human ovarian cancer (25) The fact that

              laying hens and humans share some similarities in reproductive physiology and hens have also

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

              induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

              classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

              humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

              observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

              cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

              factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

              antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

              Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

              identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

              the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

              been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

              contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

              To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

              chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

              study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

              intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

              demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

              ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

              addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

              was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

              ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

              prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

              hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

              of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

              genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

              that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

              It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

              associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

              first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

              control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

              a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

              exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

              Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

              inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

              which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

              NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

              known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

              Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

              cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

              Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

              κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

              adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

              including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

              suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

              significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

              the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

              ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

              factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

              protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

              activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

              activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

              kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

              resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

              motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

              that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

              and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

              that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

              PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

              Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

              protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

              cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

              associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

              proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

              Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

              allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

              (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

              activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

              associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

              demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

              master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

              Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

              prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

              Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

              expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

              involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

              In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

              that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

              modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

              and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

              biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

              protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

              improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              REFERENCES

              1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

              2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

              Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

              characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

              221709-1721

              3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

              Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

              Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

              subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

              2008 145198-5208

              4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

              carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

              5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

              6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

              G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

              7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

              J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

              8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

              7573-584

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

              reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

              10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

              gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

              1161697-1705

              11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

              Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

              Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

              12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

              H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

              Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

              cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

              13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

              Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

              apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

              14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

              Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

              pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

              to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

              15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

              16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

              Ljunggren

              J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

              beta

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

              17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

              estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

              18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

              Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

              growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

              261193-204

              19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

              human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

              20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

              arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

              pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

              21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

              induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

              2007 10523-30

              22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

              ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

              23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

              Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

              24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

              Cancer 2003 13405-12

              25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

              Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

              preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

              27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

              chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

              28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

              spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

              29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

              Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

              adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

              2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

              30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

              Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

              preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

              81373-379

              31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

              egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

              32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

              dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

              33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

              cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

              34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

              of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

              isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

              2010621001-1005

              36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

              Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

              37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

              human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

              38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

              antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

              2016951088-95

              39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

              mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

              cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

              40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

              fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

              41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

              autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

              Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

              42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

              1945

              43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

              Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

              induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

              Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

              culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

              45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

              46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

              KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

              future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

              47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

              of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

              48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

              CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

              112171-178

              49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

              proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

              50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

              ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

              51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

              hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

              52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

              pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

              53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

              54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

              kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

              cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

              18334-342

              56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

              SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

              convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

              57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

              Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

              NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

              58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

              cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

              59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

              Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

              Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

              cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

              60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

              149274-293

              61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

              electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

              62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

              in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

              63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

              6636-44

              64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

              Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

              analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

              65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

              epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

              2012 271918-1924

              66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

              AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

              cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

              67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

              Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

              68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

              with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

              69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

              tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

              Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

              Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

              Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

              common classification

              Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

              pattern present but not distinct

              Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

              common classification

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

              Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

              X2 301 5248 10626

              Tumor ()

              Incidence

              Reduction

              30100

              30

              -

              19100

              19

              -367

              10100

              10

              -667

              0002

              X2=12701

              Serous carcinoma ()

              Incidence

              Reduction

              19100

              19

              -

              11100

              11

              -421

              6100

              6

              -684

              0017

              X2=8144

              Mucinous carcinoma ()

              Incidence

              Reduction

              11100

              11

              -

              8100

              8

              -273

              4100

              4

              -636

              0175

              X2=3485

              Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

              Grade 1 530

              167

              719

              368

              510

              500

              0084

              X2=4943

              Grade 2 1830

              600

              819

              421

              310

              300

              0196

              X2=3258

              Grade 3 730

              233

              419

              211

              210

              200

              0968

              X2=0064

              Number of tumors1 37100

              19100 10100 00001

              Sizehen mm1

              281plusmn050a

              109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

              b 00001

              Sizehen with tumors only

              mm1

              686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

              Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

              Survival () 83100

              83

              88100

              88

              91100

              91

              0228

              X2=2953

              1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

              superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              FIGURE LEGENDS

              Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

              ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

              Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

              Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

              original magnification x40

              Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

              daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

              a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

              Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

              expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

              blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

              same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

              Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

              C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

              representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

              percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

              significantly ( P lt 005)

              Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

              tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

              same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              Figure 1 Cancer Research

              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              Figure 2 Cancer Research

              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              301 5248 10626

              0

              100

              200

              300

              400

              500

              c

              b

              a

              A

              Genistein levels mghen per day

              Gen

              iste

              in n

              mo

              ll

              301 5248 10626

              0

              20

              40

              60

              80

              B

              Genistein levels mghen per day

              Dai

              dze

              in n

              mo

              ll

              301 5248 10626

              0

              1

              2

              3

              4a

              b

              c

              C

              Genistein levels mghen per day

              Ova

              ry M

              DA

              n

              mo

              lm

              g p

              rote

              in

              Figure 3 Cancer Research

              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              Figure 4 Cancer Research

              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              301 5248 10626

              0

              50

              100

              150

              a

              b

              c

              A

              -actin

              p-mTOR

              Genistein levels mghen per day

              p-m

              TO

              R

              pe

              rce

              nt

              of

              co

              ntr

              ol

              301 5248 10626

              0

              50

              100

              150

              a

              b

              c

              B

              -actin

              p-p70S6K1

              Genistein levels mghen per day

              p-p

              70

              S6

              K1

              p

              erc

              en

              t o

              f co

              ntr

              ol

              301 5248 10626

              0

              50

              100

              150

              a

              b

              c

              C

              -actin

              p-4E-BP1

              Genistein levels mghen per day

              p-4

              E-B

              P1

              p

              erc

              en

              t o

              f co

              ntr

              ol

              Figure 5 Cancer Research

              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              301 5248 10626

              0

              50

              100

              150

              200

              250

              c

              b

              a

              A

              -actin

              Nrf2

              Genistein levels mghen per day

              Nrf

              2

              pe

              rce

              nt

              of

              co

              ntr

              ol

              301 5248 10626

              0

              50

              100

              150

              200

              250

              c

              b

              a

              B

              -actin

              HO-1

              Genistein levels mghen per day

              HO

              -1 p

              erc

              en

              t o

              f co

              ntr

              ol

              Figure 6 Cancer Research

              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

              Updated version

              1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

              Access the most recent version of this article at

              Material

              Supplementary

              89DC1

              httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

              Manuscript

              Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

              E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

              Subscriptions

              Reprints and

              pubsaacrorgDepartment at

              To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

              Permissions

              Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

              89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

              • Article File
              • Figure 1
              • Figure 2
              • Figures 3-6

                striped and used blotted for with other antibodies All antibodies were purchased from Abcam

                (Cambridge UK)

                The nitrocellulose membrane was incubated at 4degC with antibodies overnight Western

                blots were washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG

                (Abcam Cambridge UK) Specific binding was detected using diaminobenzidine and hydrogen

                peroxide as substrates Protein loading was controlled using an anti--actin antibody (Sigma)

                Samples were analyzed in quadruplicate under each experimental condition and protein levels

                were measured densitometrically using the image analysis software program ImageJ (National

                Institutes of Health)

                Statistical analysis Tumor incidences in the control and experimental groups were

                evaluated statistically using the χ2 test Data were analyzed via analysis of variance using the

                general linear model with the SAS program (2002) (SAS Institute Inc) to determine the effects

                of genistein supplementation on tumor size protein expressions and serum metabolites When a

                significant F statistic (P le 005) in the analysis of variance was noted the least squares mean

                procedure was performed to separate means that were significantly different (P lt 005) Linear

                and quadratic polynomial contrasts of the responses were used to evaluate the effects of the three

                dosages of genistein administered to the animals for serum metabolites

                RESULTS

                Genistein reduces the incidence and number of spontaneous ovarian tumors in laying hens

                To investigate the effects of genistein supplementation on the development of

                spontaneous ovarian tumors a total of 300 laying hens at age of 182 weeks was randomized to

                three groups (n = 100 per group) (i) control (301 mgday genistein) (ii) low-dose genistein

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                (5248 mghen per day) and (iii) high-dose genistein (10626 mghen per day) (Supplementary

                Figure 1) At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein the study was terminated and

                necropsy was performed for the examination of gross pathology and microscopy of the tumors

                (Figure 1 and 2) In hens revealed a significant effect of genistein on the incidence of

                spontaneous ovarian cancer (Table 2) Thirty percent of the hens in the control group developed

                ovarian tumors as reported previously (25) The incidence of ovarian cancer significantly

                decreased in both LG- and HG-treated hens (19 and 10 respectively) compared with control

                group (p = 0002) indicating that genistein acts in a dose-dependent manner Based on the

                histopathological assessment of the tumors two subtypes of ovarian cancer including serous and

                mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens representative images are illustrated in Figure

                2B-C The histopathology grading system based on mitotic developments and cellular

                differentiation is illustrated in Table 1 for the ovary There is no a significantly lower incidence

                of adenocarcinoma in birds receiving genistein compared to the control birds (p gt 005) In the

                control group 63 of tumor-bearing hens developed serous carcinoma whereas 37 of them

                had mucinous carcinoma However there was no significant difference in the incidence of each

                subtype of ovarian tumors between control and treatment groups (Table 2)

                Additionally genistein treatment significantly reduced both the number and size of

                ovarian tumors compared to the control group (Table 2) Hens in the control group had an

                average of 37100 tumors (37 tumors in total number of animals 100) whereas low- and high

                genistein-treated hens had 19100 and 10100 tumors respectively Average sizes of the tumors

                were 281 109 and 047 mm in the control LG and HG groups respectively (p = 00001)

                At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein we also observed that overall

                survival rates in genistein groups were higher compared to that of control group although the

                differences were not statistically significant (Table 2) In control group 83 of the hens stayed

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                alive until the end of the experiment while 88 and 91 of the animals were alive in the LG and

                HG groups respectively

                Genistein supplementation results in enhanced genistein levels in serum and reduced MDA

                in the ovary of laying hens

                To demonstrate that the lower ovarian cancer incidence in the treatment groups was

                specifically due to the genistein intervention we measured serum levels of genistein and

                daidzein in 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3A-B) As expected hens treated with low or

                high genistein fed groups had significantly higher serum genistein levels (25183 nmoll and

                35800 nmoll respectively) compared with the control animals (14875 nmoll) (p lt 005) and

                the increase in the level of serum genistein was dose-dependent However genistein

                supplementation had no effect on serum level of daidzein in any of the treatment groups (Figure

                3B)

                Several studies have shown that oxidative stress is involved in a wide variety of cancers

                including ovarian cancer (35) To determine the effects of genistein on the hen ovary in the

                context of oxidative stress we analyzed the levels of MDA which is a widely used marker of

                oxidative stress in the ovaries of 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3C) Our data showed

                that treatment of hens with genistein significantly and dose-dependently decreased the level of

                MDA in the ovary (p lt 005) The average level of ovarian MDA was 304 nmolmg in the

                control group while it was 199 nmolmg and 121 nmolmg in low- and high genistein-fed

                groups respectively These results confirm that genistein treatment could ameliorate oxidative

                stress in the hen ovary

                Genistein decreases the expression of NF-κB and Bcl-2 while increasing the expression of

                Bax in the ovary of laying hens

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                To characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the genistein-induced changes in

                the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer we first examined the effect of genistein on the nuclear

                factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway which has been shown as one of the key survival

                pathways activated by oxidative stress (40) As illustrated in Figure 4A both low and high

                genistein treatments significantly reduced the protein expression level of NF-κB indicating that

                genistein mediates its anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer through NF-κB signaling pathway In

                addition the expression levels of pro-survival Bcl-2 and pro-apoptotic Bax which are

                transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB were also analyzed (Figure 4B-C) Our findings showed

                that genistein significantly downregulates Bcl-2 whereas significantly upregulates Bax leading

                to a reduced ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax and consequently inducing apoptosis

                Genistein suppresses the mTOR pathway in the ovary of laying hens

                To further explore the mechanisms involved in the genistein-induced changes in the

                ovarian carcinogenesis we studied the effects of genistein on the mammalian target of

                rapamycin (mTOR) survival signaling which has also been shown to be associated with

                oxidative stress (41) mTOR which is a downstream target of AKT is a SerThr kinase that

                phosphorylates p70S6K and 4EBP1 (42) As shown in Figure 5A-C treatment of hens with low

                or high genistein significantly decreased the levels of phosphorylated proteins of mTOR

                p70S6K and 4EBP1 leading to the inactivation of the mTOR signal transduction These data

                demonstrate that mTOR signaling pathway also participates in the genistein-induced responses in

                ovarian cancer cells

                Genistein upregulates Nrf2 and HO-1 in the ovary of laying hens

                It is well established that activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is

                one of the major mechanisms in the cellular defense against oxidative stress (43) Similar to

                Nrf2 its downstream protein HO-1 has also a protective effect against oxidative stress (44) As

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                illustrated in Figure 6A-B significantly increased levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were observed in the

                genistein-treated groups indicating that genistein exerts its chemopreventive effect on the ovary

                by activating the Nrf2-induced cellular stress responses

                DISCUSSION

                Although surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions have improved the overall survival

                rates effective treatment of ovarian cancer is limited due to the major challenges such as

                clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity lack of early detection strategies for the disease

                tumor recurrence and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (6-8 45) Therefore

                chemoprevention of ovarian cancer by non-toxic naturally occurring or synthetic agents

                provides a rational approach to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer

                Epidemiological studies have shown that the dietary intake of soybean is associated with reduced

                risks of various types of cancer including ovarian cancer (46) Genistein the most abundant

                isoflavone in soybean has been reported to play a key role in the prevention of ovarian cancer

                (17-23) Although numerous epidemiological and in vitro studies have demonstrated that

                genistein is an effective anti-tumor agent in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer there is a

                lack of well-characterized studies that address the efficacy and mechanisms of action of genistein

                in a biologically relevant in vivo model of spontaneous ovarian carcinogenesis In the present

                study therefore we utilized the laying hen model to prospectively test the chemopreventive

                effects of genistein on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer and to further investigate the

                molecular mechanisms underlying the actions of genistein on the initiation and progression of

                ovarian cancer

                Laying hens have been shown to develop spontaneous ovarian cancer at a high rate

                providing an appropriate natural experimental model of human ovarian cancer (25) The fact that

                laying hens and humans share some similarities in reproductive physiology and hens have also

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

                induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

                classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

                humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

                observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

                cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

                factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

                antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

                Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

                identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

                the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

                been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

                contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

                To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

                chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

                study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

                intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

                demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

                ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

                addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

                was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

                ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

                prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

                hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

                of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

                genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

                that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

                It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

                associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

                first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

                control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

                a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

                exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

                Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

                inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

                which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

                NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

                known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

                Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

                cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

                Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

                κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

                adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

                including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

                suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

                significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

                the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

                ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

                factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

                protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

                activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

                activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

                kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

                resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

                motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

                that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

                and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

                that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

                PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

                Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

                protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

                cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

                associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

                proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

                Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

                allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

                (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

                activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

                associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

                demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

                master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

                Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

                prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

                Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

                expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

                involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

                In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

                that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

                modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

                and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

                biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

                protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

                improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                REFERENCES

                1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

                2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

                Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

                characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

                221709-1721

                3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

                Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

                Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

                subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

                2008 145198-5208

                4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

                carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

                5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

                6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

                G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

                7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

                J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

                8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

                7573-584

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

                reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

                10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

                gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

                1161697-1705

                11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

                Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

                Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

                12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

                H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

                Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

                cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

                13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

                Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

                apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

                14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

                Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

                pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

                to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

                15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

                16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

                Ljunggren

                J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

                beta

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

                17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

                estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

                18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

                Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

                growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

                261193-204

                19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

                human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

                20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

                arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

                pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

                21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

                induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

                2007 10523-30

                22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

                ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

                23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

                Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

                24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

                Cancer 2003 13405-12

                25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                81373-379

                31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                2010621001-1005

                36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                2016951088-95

                39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                1945

                43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                112171-178

                49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                18334-342

                56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                149274-293

                61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                6636-44

                64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                2012 271918-1924

                66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                common classification

                Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                pattern present but not distinct

                Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                common classification

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                X2 301 5248 10626

                Tumor ()

                Incidence

                Reduction

                30100

                30

                -

                19100

                19

                -367

                10100

                10

                -667

                0002

                X2=12701

                Serous carcinoma ()

                Incidence

                Reduction

                19100

                19

                -

                11100

                11

                -421

                6100

                6

                -684

                0017

                X2=8144

                Mucinous carcinoma ()

                Incidence

                Reduction

                11100

                11

                -

                8100

                8

                -273

                4100

                4

                -636

                0175

                X2=3485

                Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                Grade 1 530

                167

                719

                368

                510

                500

                0084

                X2=4943

                Grade 2 1830

                600

                819

                421

                310

                300

                0196

                X2=3258

                Grade 3 730

                233

                419

                211

                210

                200

                0968

                X2=0064

                Number of tumors1 37100

                19100 10100 00001

                Sizehen mm1

                281plusmn050a

                109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                b 00001

                Sizehen with tumors only

                mm1

                686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                Survival () 83100

                83

                88100

                88

                91100

                91

                0228

                X2=2953

                1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                FIGURE LEGENDS

                Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                original magnification x40

                Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                significantly ( P lt 005)

                Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                Figure 1 Cancer Research

                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                Figure 2 Cancer Research

                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                301 5248 10626

                0

                100

                200

                300

                400

                500

                c

                b

                a

                A

                Genistein levels mghen per day

                Gen

                iste

                in n

                mo

                ll

                301 5248 10626

                0

                20

                40

                60

                80

                B

                Genistein levels mghen per day

                Dai

                dze

                in n

                mo

                ll

                301 5248 10626

                0

                1

                2

                3

                4a

                b

                c

                C

                Genistein levels mghen per day

                Ova

                ry M

                DA

                n

                mo

                lm

                g p

                rote

                in

                Figure 3 Cancer Research

                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                Figure 4 Cancer Research

                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                301 5248 10626

                0

                50

                100

                150

                a

                b

                c

                A

                -actin

                p-mTOR

                Genistein levels mghen per day

                p-m

                TO

                R

                pe

                rce

                nt

                of

                co

                ntr

                ol

                301 5248 10626

                0

                50

                100

                150

                a

                b

                c

                B

                -actin

                p-p70S6K1

                Genistein levels mghen per day

                p-p

                70

                S6

                K1

                p

                erc

                en

                t o

                f co

                ntr

                ol

                301 5248 10626

                0

                50

                100

                150

                a

                b

                c

                C

                -actin

                p-4E-BP1

                Genistein levels mghen per day

                p-4

                E-B

                P1

                p

                erc

                en

                t o

                f co

                ntr

                ol

                Figure 5 Cancer Research

                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                301 5248 10626

                0

                50

                100

                150

                200

                250

                c

                b

                a

                A

                -actin

                Nrf2

                Genistein levels mghen per day

                Nrf

                2

                pe

                rce

                nt

                of

                co

                ntr

                ol

                301 5248 10626

                0

                50

                100

                150

                200

                250

                c

                b

                a

                B

                -actin

                HO-1

                Genistein levels mghen per day

                HO

                -1 p

                erc

                en

                t o

                f co

                ntr

                ol

                Figure 6 Cancer Research

                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                Updated version

                1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                Access the most recent version of this article at

                Material

                Supplementary

                89DC1

                httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                Manuscript

                Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                Subscriptions

                Reprints and

                pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                Permissions

                Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                • Article File
                • Figure 1
                • Figure 2
                • Figures 3-6

                  (5248 mghen per day) and (iii) high-dose genistein (10626 mghen per day) (Supplementary

                  Figure 1) At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein the study was terminated and

                  necropsy was performed for the examination of gross pathology and microscopy of the tumors

                  (Figure 1 and 2) In hens revealed a significant effect of genistein on the incidence of

                  spontaneous ovarian cancer (Table 2) Thirty percent of the hens in the control group developed

                  ovarian tumors as reported previously (25) The incidence of ovarian cancer significantly

                  decreased in both LG- and HG-treated hens (19 and 10 respectively) compared with control

                  group (p = 0002) indicating that genistein acts in a dose-dependent manner Based on the

                  histopathological assessment of the tumors two subtypes of ovarian cancer including serous and

                  mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens representative images are illustrated in Figure

                  2B-C The histopathology grading system based on mitotic developments and cellular

                  differentiation is illustrated in Table 1 for the ovary There is no a significantly lower incidence

                  of adenocarcinoma in birds receiving genistein compared to the control birds (p gt 005) In the

                  control group 63 of tumor-bearing hens developed serous carcinoma whereas 37 of them

                  had mucinous carcinoma However there was no significant difference in the incidence of each

                  subtype of ovarian tumors between control and treatment groups (Table 2)

                  Additionally genistein treatment significantly reduced both the number and size of

                  ovarian tumors compared to the control group (Table 2) Hens in the control group had an

                  average of 37100 tumors (37 tumors in total number of animals 100) whereas low- and high

                  genistein-treated hens had 19100 and 10100 tumors respectively Average sizes of the tumors

                  were 281 109 and 047 mm in the control LG and HG groups respectively (p = 00001)

                  At the end of 78 weeks administration of genistein we also observed that overall

                  survival rates in genistein groups were higher compared to that of control group although the

                  differences were not statistically significant (Table 2) In control group 83 of the hens stayed

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  alive until the end of the experiment while 88 and 91 of the animals were alive in the LG and

                  HG groups respectively

                  Genistein supplementation results in enhanced genistein levels in serum and reduced MDA

                  in the ovary of laying hens

                  To demonstrate that the lower ovarian cancer incidence in the treatment groups was

                  specifically due to the genistein intervention we measured serum levels of genistein and

                  daidzein in 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3A-B) As expected hens treated with low or

                  high genistein fed groups had significantly higher serum genistein levels (25183 nmoll and

                  35800 nmoll respectively) compared with the control animals (14875 nmoll) (p lt 005) and

                  the increase in the level of serum genistein was dose-dependent However genistein

                  supplementation had no effect on serum level of daidzein in any of the treatment groups (Figure

                  3B)

                  Several studies have shown that oxidative stress is involved in a wide variety of cancers

                  including ovarian cancer (35) To determine the effects of genistein on the hen ovary in the

                  context of oxidative stress we analyzed the levels of MDA which is a widely used marker of

                  oxidative stress in the ovaries of 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3C) Our data showed

                  that treatment of hens with genistein significantly and dose-dependently decreased the level of

                  MDA in the ovary (p lt 005) The average level of ovarian MDA was 304 nmolmg in the

                  control group while it was 199 nmolmg and 121 nmolmg in low- and high genistein-fed

                  groups respectively These results confirm that genistein treatment could ameliorate oxidative

                  stress in the hen ovary

                  Genistein decreases the expression of NF-κB and Bcl-2 while increasing the expression of

                  Bax in the ovary of laying hens

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  To characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the genistein-induced changes in

                  the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer we first examined the effect of genistein on the nuclear

                  factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway which has been shown as one of the key survival

                  pathways activated by oxidative stress (40) As illustrated in Figure 4A both low and high

                  genistein treatments significantly reduced the protein expression level of NF-κB indicating that

                  genistein mediates its anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer through NF-κB signaling pathway In

                  addition the expression levels of pro-survival Bcl-2 and pro-apoptotic Bax which are

                  transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB were also analyzed (Figure 4B-C) Our findings showed

                  that genistein significantly downregulates Bcl-2 whereas significantly upregulates Bax leading

                  to a reduced ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax and consequently inducing apoptosis

                  Genistein suppresses the mTOR pathway in the ovary of laying hens

                  To further explore the mechanisms involved in the genistein-induced changes in the

                  ovarian carcinogenesis we studied the effects of genistein on the mammalian target of

                  rapamycin (mTOR) survival signaling which has also been shown to be associated with

                  oxidative stress (41) mTOR which is a downstream target of AKT is a SerThr kinase that

                  phosphorylates p70S6K and 4EBP1 (42) As shown in Figure 5A-C treatment of hens with low

                  or high genistein significantly decreased the levels of phosphorylated proteins of mTOR

                  p70S6K and 4EBP1 leading to the inactivation of the mTOR signal transduction These data

                  demonstrate that mTOR signaling pathway also participates in the genistein-induced responses in

                  ovarian cancer cells

                  Genistein upregulates Nrf2 and HO-1 in the ovary of laying hens

                  It is well established that activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is

                  one of the major mechanisms in the cellular defense against oxidative stress (43) Similar to

                  Nrf2 its downstream protein HO-1 has also a protective effect against oxidative stress (44) As

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  illustrated in Figure 6A-B significantly increased levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were observed in the

                  genistein-treated groups indicating that genistein exerts its chemopreventive effect on the ovary

                  by activating the Nrf2-induced cellular stress responses

                  DISCUSSION

                  Although surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions have improved the overall survival

                  rates effective treatment of ovarian cancer is limited due to the major challenges such as

                  clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity lack of early detection strategies for the disease

                  tumor recurrence and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (6-8 45) Therefore

                  chemoprevention of ovarian cancer by non-toxic naturally occurring or synthetic agents

                  provides a rational approach to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer

                  Epidemiological studies have shown that the dietary intake of soybean is associated with reduced

                  risks of various types of cancer including ovarian cancer (46) Genistein the most abundant

                  isoflavone in soybean has been reported to play a key role in the prevention of ovarian cancer

                  (17-23) Although numerous epidemiological and in vitro studies have demonstrated that

                  genistein is an effective anti-tumor agent in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer there is a

                  lack of well-characterized studies that address the efficacy and mechanisms of action of genistein

                  in a biologically relevant in vivo model of spontaneous ovarian carcinogenesis In the present

                  study therefore we utilized the laying hen model to prospectively test the chemopreventive

                  effects of genistein on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer and to further investigate the

                  molecular mechanisms underlying the actions of genistein on the initiation and progression of

                  ovarian cancer

                  Laying hens have been shown to develop spontaneous ovarian cancer at a high rate

                  providing an appropriate natural experimental model of human ovarian cancer (25) The fact that

                  laying hens and humans share some similarities in reproductive physiology and hens have also

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

                  induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

                  classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

                  humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

                  observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

                  cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

                  factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

                  antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

                  Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

                  identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

                  the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

                  been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

                  contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

                  To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

                  chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

                  study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

                  intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

                  demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

                  ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

                  addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

                  was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

                  ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

                  prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

                  hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

                  of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

                  genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

                  that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

                  It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

                  associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

                  first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

                  control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

                  a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

                  exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

                  Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

                  inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

                  which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

                  NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

                  known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

                  Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

                  cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

                  Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

                  κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

                  adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

                  including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

                  suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

                  significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

                  the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

                  ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

                  factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

                  protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

                  activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

                  activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

                  kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

                  resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

                  motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

                  that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

                  and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

                  that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

                  PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

                  Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

                  protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

                  cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

                  associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

                  proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

                  Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

                  allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

                  (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

                  activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

                  associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

                  demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

                  master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

                  Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

                  prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

                  Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

                  expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

                  involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

                  In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

                  that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

                  modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

                  and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

                  biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

                  protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

                  improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  REFERENCES

                  1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

                  2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

                  Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

                  characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

                  221709-1721

                  3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

                  Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

                  Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

                  subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

                  2008 145198-5208

                  4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

                  carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

                  5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

                  6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

                  G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

                  7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

                  J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

                  8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

                  7573-584

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

                  reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

                  10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

                  gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

                  1161697-1705

                  11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

                  Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

                  Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

                  12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

                  H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

                  Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

                  cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

                  13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

                  Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

                  apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

                  14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

                  Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

                  pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

                  to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

                  15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

                  16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

                  Ljunggren

                  J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

                  beta

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

                  17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

                  estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

                  18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

                  Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

                  growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

                  261193-204

                  19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

                  human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

                  20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

                  arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

                  pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

                  21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

                  induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

                  2007 10523-30

                  22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

                  ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

                  23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

                  Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

                  24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

                  Cancer 2003 13405-12

                  25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                  Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                  preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                  27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                  chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                  28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                  spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                  29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                  Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                  adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                  2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                  30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                  Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                  preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                  81373-379

                  31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                  egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                  32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                  dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                  33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                  cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                  34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                  of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                  isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                  2010621001-1005

                  36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                  Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                  37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                  human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                  38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                  antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                  2016951088-95

                  39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                  mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                  cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                  40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                  fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                  41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                  autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                  Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                  42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                  1945

                  43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                  Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                  induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                  Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                  culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                  45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                  46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                  KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                  future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                  47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                  of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                  48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                  CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                  112171-178

                  49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                  proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                  50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                  ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                  51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                  hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                  52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                  pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                  53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                  54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                  kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                  cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                  18334-342

                  56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                  SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                  convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                  57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                  Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                  NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                  58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                  cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                  59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                  Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                  Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                  cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                  60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                  149274-293

                  61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                  electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                  62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                  in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                  63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                  6636-44

                  64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                  Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                  analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                  65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                  epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                  2012 271918-1924

                  66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                  AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                  cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                  67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                  Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                  68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                  with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                  69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                  tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                  Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                  Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                  Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                  common classification

                  Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                  pattern present but not distinct

                  Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                  common classification

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                  Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                  X2 301 5248 10626

                  Tumor ()

                  Incidence

                  Reduction

                  30100

                  30

                  -

                  19100

                  19

                  -367

                  10100

                  10

                  -667

                  0002

                  X2=12701

                  Serous carcinoma ()

                  Incidence

                  Reduction

                  19100

                  19

                  -

                  11100

                  11

                  -421

                  6100

                  6

                  -684

                  0017

                  X2=8144

                  Mucinous carcinoma ()

                  Incidence

                  Reduction

                  11100

                  11

                  -

                  8100

                  8

                  -273

                  4100

                  4

                  -636

                  0175

                  X2=3485

                  Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                  Grade 1 530

                  167

                  719

                  368

                  510

                  500

                  0084

                  X2=4943

                  Grade 2 1830

                  600

                  819

                  421

                  310

                  300

                  0196

                  X2=3258

                  Grade 3 730

                  233

                  419

                  211

                  210

                  200

                  0968

                  X2=0064

                  Number of tumors1 37100

                  19100 10100 00001

                  Sizehen mm1

                  281plusmn050a

                  109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                  b 00001

                  Sizehen with tumors only

                  mm1

                  686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                  Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                  Survival () 83100

                  83

                  88100

                  88

                  91100

                  91

                  0228

                  X2=2953

                  1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                  superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  FIGURE LEGENDS

                  Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                  ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                  Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                  Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                  original magnification x40

                  Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                  daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                  a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                  Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                  expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                  blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                  same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                  Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                  C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                  representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                  percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                  significantly ( P lt 005)

                  Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                  tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                  same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  Figure 1 Cancer Research

                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  Figure 2 Cancer Research

                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  301 5248 10626

                  0

                  100

                  200

                  300

                  400

                  500

                  c

                  b

                  a

                  A

                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                  Gen

                  iste

                  in n

                  mo

                  ll

                  301 5248 10626

                  0

                  20

                  40

                  60

                  80

                  B

                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                  Dai

                  dze

                  in n

                  mo

                  ll

                  301 5248 10626

                  0

                  1

                  2

                  3

                  4a

                  b

                  c

                  C

                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                  Ova

                  ry M

                  DA

                  n

                  mo

                  lm

                  g p

                  rote

                  in

                  Figure 3 Cancer Research

                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  Figure 4 Cancer Research

                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  301 5248 10626

                  0

                  50

                  100

                  150

                  a

                  b

                  c

                  A

                  -actin

                  p-mTOR

                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                  p-m

                  TO

                  R

                  pe

                  rce

                  nt

                  of

                  co

                  ntr

                  ol

                  301 5248 10626

                  0

                  50

                  100

                  150

                  a

                  b

                  c

                  B

                  -actin

                  p-p70S6K1

                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                  p-p

                  70

                  S6

                  K1

                  p

                  erc

                  en

                  t o

                  f co

                  ntr

                  ol

                  301 5248 10626

                  0

                  50

                  100

                  150

                  a

                  b

                  c

                  C

                  -actin

                  p-4E-BP1

                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                  p-4

                  E-B

                  P1

                  p

                  erc

                  en

                  t o

                  f co

                  ntr

                  ol

                  Figure 5 Cancer Research

                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  301 5248 10626

                  0

                  50

                  100

                  150

                  200

                  250

                  c

                  b

                  a

                  A

                  -actin

                  Nrf2

                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                  Nrf

                  2

                  pe

                  rce

                  nt

                  of

                  co

                  ntr

                  ol

                  301 5248 10626

                  0

                  50

                  100

                  150

                  200

                  250

                  c

                  b

                  a

                  B

                  -actin

                  HO-1

                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                  HO

                  -1 p

                  erc

                  en

                  t o

                  f co

                  ntr

                  ol

                  Figure 6 Cancer Research

                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                  Updated version

                  1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                  Access the most recent version of this article at

                  Material

                  Supplementary

                  89DC1

                  httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                  Manuscript

                  Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                  E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                  Subscriptions

                  Reprints and

                  pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                  To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                  Permissions

                  Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                  89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                  • Article File
                  • Figure 1
                  • Figure 2
                  • Figures 3-6

                    alive until the end of the experiment while 88 and 91 of the animals were alive in the LG and

                    HG groups respectively

                    Genistein supplementation results in enhanced genistein levels in serum and reduced MDA

                    in the ovary of laying hens

                    To demonstrate that the lower ovarian cancer incidence in the treatment groups was

                    specifically due to the genistein intervention we measured serum levels of genistein and

                    daidzein in 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3A-B) As expected hens treated with low or

                    high genistein fed groups had significantly higher serum genistein levels (25183 nmoll and

                    35800 nmoll respectively) compared with the control animals (14875 nmoll) (p lt 005) and

                    the increase in the level of serum genistein was dose-dependent However genistein

                    supplementation had no effect on serum level of daidzein in any of the treatment groups (Figure

                    3B)

                    Several studies have shown that oxidative stress is involved in a wide variety of cancers

                    including ovarian cancer (35) To determine the effects of genistein on the hen ovary in the

                    context of oxidative stress we analyzed the levels of MDA which is a widely used marker of

                    oxidative stress in the ovaries of 12 hens per group using HPLC (Figure 3C) Our data showed

                    that treatment of hens with genistein significantly and dose-dependently decreased the level of

                    MDA in the ovary (p lt 005) The average level of ovarian MDA was 304 nmolmg in the

                    control group while it was 199 nmolmg and 121 nmolmg in low- and high genistein-fed

                    groups respectively These results confirm that genistein treatment could ameliorate oxidative

                    stress in the hen ovary

                    Genistein decreases the expression of NF-κB and Bcl-2 while increasing the expression of

                    Bax in the ovary of laying hens

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    To characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the genistein-induced changes in

                    the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer we first examined the effect of genistein on the nuclear

                    factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway which has been shown as one of the key survival

                    pathways activated by oxidative stress (40) As illustrated in Figure 4A both low and high

                    genistein treatments significantly reduced the protein expression level of NF-κB indicating that

                    genistein mediates its anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer through NF-κB signaling pathway In

                    addition the expression levels of pro-survival Bcl-2 and pro-apoptotic Bax which are

                    transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB were also analyzed (Figure 4B-C) Our findings showed

                    that genistein significantly downregulates Bcl-2 whereas significantly upregulates Bax leading

                    to a reduced ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax and consequently inducing apoptosis

                    Genistein suppresses the mTOR pathway in the ovary of laying hens

                    To further explore the mechanisms involved in the genistein-induced changes in the

                    ovarian carcinogenesis we studied the effects of genistein on the mammalian target of

                    rapamycin (mTOR) survival signaling which has also been shown to be associated with

                    oxidative stress (41) mTOR which is a downstream target of AKT is a SerThr kinase that

                    phosphorylates p70S6K and 4EBP1 (42) As shown in Figure 5A-C treatment of hens with low

                    or high genistein significantly decreased the levels of phosphorylated proteins of mTOR

                    p70S6K and 4EBP1 leading to the inactivation of the mTOR signal transduction These data

                    demonstrate that mTOR signaling pathway also participates in the genistein-induced responses in

                    ovarian cancer cells

                    Genistein upregulates Nrf2 and HO-1 in the ovary of laying hens

                    It is well established that activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is

                    one of the major mechanisms in the cellular defense against oxidative stress (43) Similar to

                    Nrf2 its downstream protein HO-1 has also a protective effect against oxidative stress (44) As

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    illustrated in Figure 6A-B significantly increased levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were observed in the

                    genistein-treated groups indicating that genistein exerts its chemopreventive effect on the ovary

                    by activating the Nrf2-induced cellular stress responses

                    DISCUSSION

                    Although surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions have improved the overall survival

                    rates effective treatment of ovarian cancer is limited due to the major challenges such as

                    clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity lack of early detection strategies for the disease

                    tumor recurrence and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (6-8 45) Therefore

                    chemoprevention of ovarian cancer by non-toxic naturally occurring or synthetic agents

                    provides a rational approach to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer

                    Epidemiological studies have shown that the dietary intake of soybean is associated with reduced

                    risks of various types of cancer including ovarian cancer (46) Genistein the most abundant

                    isoflavone in soybean has been reported to play a key role in the prevention of ovarian cancer

                    (17-23) Although numerous epidemiological and in vitro studies have demonstrated that

                    genistein is an effective anti-tumor agent in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer there is a

                    lack of well-characterized studies that address the efficacy and mechanisms of action of genistein

                    in a biologically relevant in vivo model of spontaneous ovarian carcinogenesis In the present

                    study therefore we utilized the laying hen model to prospectively test the chemopreventive

                    effects of genistein on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer and to further investigate the

                    molecular mechanisms underlying the actions of genistein on the initiation and progression of

                    ovarian cancer

                    Laying hens have been shown to develop spontaneous ovarian cancer at a high rate

                    providing an appropriate natural experimental model of human ovarian cancer (25) The fact that

                    laying hens and humans share some similarities in reproductive physiology and hens have also

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

                    induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

                    classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

                    humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

                    observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

                    cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

                    factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

                    antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

                    Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

                    identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

                    the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

                    been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

                    contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

                    To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

                    chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

                    study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

                    intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

                    demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

                    ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

                    addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

                    was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

                    ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

                    prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

                    hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

                    of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

                    genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

                    that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

                    It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

                    associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

                    first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

                    control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

                    a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

                    exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

                    Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

                    inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

                    which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

                    NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

                    known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

                    Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

                    cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

                    Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

                    κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

                    adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

                    including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

                    suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

                    significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

                    the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

                    ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

                    factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

                    protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

                    activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

                    activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

                    kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

                    resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

                    motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

                    that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

                    and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

                    that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

                    PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

                    Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

                    protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

                    cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

                    associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

                    proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

                    Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

                    allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

                    (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

                    activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

                    associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

                    demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

                    master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

                    Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

                    prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

                    Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

                    expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

                    involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

                    In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

                    that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

                    modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

                    and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

                    biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

                    protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

                    improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    REFERENCES

                    1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

                    2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

                    Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

                    characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

                    221709-1721

                    3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

                    Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

                    Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

                    subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

                    2008 145198-5208

                    4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

                    carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

                    5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

                    6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

                    G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

                    7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

                    J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

                    8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

                    7573-584

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

                    reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

                    10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

                    gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

                    1161697-1705

                    11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

                    Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

                    Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

                    12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

                    H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

                    Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

                    cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

                    13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

                    Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

                    apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

                    14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

                    Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

                    pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

                    to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

                    15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

                    16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

                    Ljunggren

                    J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

                    beta

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

                    17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

                    estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

                    18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

                    Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

                    growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

                    261193-204

                    19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

                    human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

                    20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

                    arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

                    pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

                    21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

                    induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

                    2007 10523-30

                    22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

                    ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

                    23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

                    Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

                    24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

                    Cancer 2003 13405-12

                    25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                    Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                    preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                    27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                    chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                    28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                    spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                    29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                    Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                    adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                    2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                    30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                    Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                    preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                    81373-379

                    31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                    egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                    32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                    dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                    33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                    cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                    34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                    of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                    isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                    2010621001-1005

                    36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                    Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                    37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                    human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                    38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                    antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                    2016951088-95

                    39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                    mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                    cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                    40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                    fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                    41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                    autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                    Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                    42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                    1945

                    43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                    Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                    induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                    Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                    culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                    45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                    46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                    KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                    future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                    47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                    of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                    48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                    CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                    112171-178

                    49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                    proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                    50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                    ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                    51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                    hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                    52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                    pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                    53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                    54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                    kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                    cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                    18334-342

                    56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                    SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                    convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                    57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                    Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                    NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                    58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                    cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                    59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                    Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                    Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                    cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                    60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                    149274-293

                    61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                    electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                    62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                    in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                    63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                    6636-44

                    64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                    Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                    analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                    65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                    epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                    2012 271918-1924

                    66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                    AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                    cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                    67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                    Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                    68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                    with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                    69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                    tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                    Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                    Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                    Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                    common classification

                    Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                    pattern present but not distinct

                    Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                    common classification

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                    Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                    X2 301 5248 10626

                    Tumor ()

                    Incidence

                    Reduction

                    30100

                    30

                    -

                    19100

                    19

                    -367

                    10100

                    10

                    -667

                    0002

                    X2=12701

                    Serous carcinoma ()

                    Incidence

                    Reduction

                    19100

                    19

                    -

                    11100

                    11

                    -421

                    6100

                    6

                    -684

                    0017

                    X2=8144

                    Mucinous carcinoma ()

                    Incidence

                    Reduction

                    11100

                    11

                    -

                    8100

                    8

                    -273

                    4100

                    4

                    -636

                    0175

                    X2=3485

                    Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                    Grade 1 530

                    167

                    719

                    368

                    510

                    500

                    0084

                    X2=4943

                    Grade 2 1830

                    600

                    819

                    421

                    310

                    300

                    0196

                    X2=3258

                    Grade 3 730

                    233

                    419

                    211

                    210

                    200

                    0968

                    X2=0064

                    Number of tumors1 37100

                    19100 10100 00001

                    Sizehen mm1

                    281plusmn050a

                    109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                    b 00001

                    Sizehen with tumors only

                    mm1

                    686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                    Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                    Survival () 83100

                    83

                    88100

                    88

                    91100

                    91

                    0228

                    X2=2953

                    1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                    superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    FIGURE LEGENDS

                    Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                    ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                    Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                    Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                    original magnification x40

                    Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                    daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                    a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                    Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                    expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                    blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                    same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                    Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                    C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                    representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                    percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                    significantly ( P lt 005)

                    Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                    tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                    same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    Figure 1 Cancer Research

                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    Figure 2 Cancer Research

                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    301 5248 10626

                    0

                    100

                    200

                    300

                    400

                    500

                    c

                    b

                    a

                    A

                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                    Gen

                    iste

                    in n

                    mo

                    ll

                    301 5248 10626

                    0

                    20

                    40

                    60

                    80

                    B

                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                    Dai

                    dze

                    in n

                    mo

                    ll

                    301 5248 10626

                    0

                    1

                    2

                    3

                    4a

                    b

                    c

                    C

                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                    Ova

                    ry M

                    DA

                    n

                    mo

                    lm

                    g p

                    rote

                    in

                    Figure 3 Cancer Research

                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    Figure 4 Cancer Research

                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    301 5248 10626

                    0

                    50

                    100

                    150

                    a

                    b

                    c

                    A

                    -actin

                    p-mTOR

                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                    p-m

                    TO

                    R

                    pe

                    rce

                    nt

                    of

                    co

                    ntr

                    ol

                    301 5248 10626

                    0

                    50

                    100

                    150

                    a

                    b

                    c

                    B

                    -actin

                    p-p70S6K1

                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                    p-p

                    70

                    S6

                    K1

                    p

                    erc

                    en

                    t o

                    f co

                    ntr

                    ol

                    301 5248 10626

                    0

                    50

                    100

                    150

                    a

                    b

                    c

                    C

                    -actin

                    p-4E-BP1

                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                    p-4

                    E-B

                    P1

                    p

                    erc

                    en

                    t o

                    f co

                    ntr

                    ol

                    Figure 5 Cancer Research

                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    301 5248 10626

                    0

                    50

                    100

                    150

                    200

                    250

                    c

                    b

                    a

                    A

                    -actin

                    Nrf2

                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                    Nrf

                    2

                    pe

                    rce

                    nt

                    of

                    co

                    ntr

                    ol

                    301 5248 10626

                    0

                    50

                    100

                    150

                    200

                    250

                    c

                    b

                    a

                    B

                    -actin

                    HO-1

                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                    HO

                    -1 p

                    erc

                    en

                    t o

                    f co

                    ntr

                    ol

                    Figure 6 Cancer Research

                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                    Updated version

                    1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                    Access the most recent version of this article at

                    Material

                    Supplementary

                    89DC1

                    httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                    Manuscript

                    Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                    E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                    Subscriptions

                    Reprints and

                    pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                    To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                    Permissions

                    Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                    89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                    • Article File
                    • Figure 1
                    • Figure 2
                    • Figures 3-6

                      To characterize the molecular mechanisms underlying the genistein-induced changes in

                      the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer we first examined the effect of genistein on the nuclear

                      factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway which has been shown as one of the key survival

                      pathways activated by oxidative stress (40) As illustrated in Figure 4A both low and high

                      genistein treatments significantly reduced the protein expression level of NF-κB indicating that

                      genistein mediates its anti-tumor effects on ovarian cancer through NF-κB signaling pathway In

                      addition the expression levels of pro-survival Bcl-2 and pro-apoptotic Bax which are

                      transcriptionally regulated by NF-κB were also analyzed (Figure 4B-C) Our findings showed

                      that genistein significantly downregulates Bcl-2 whereas significantly upregulates Bax leading

                      to a reduced ratio of Bcl-2 to Bax and consequently inducing apoptosis

                      Genistein suppresses the mTOR pathway in the ovary of laying hens

                      To further explore the mechanisms involved in the genistein-induced changes in the

                      ovarian carcinogenesis we studied the effects of genistein on the mammalian target of

                      rapamycin (mTOR) survival signaling which has also been shown to be associated with

                      oxidative stress (41) mTOR which is a downstream target of AKT is a SerThr kinase that

                      phosphorylates p70S6K and 4EBP1 (42) As shown in Figure 5A-C treatment of hens with low

                      or high genistein significantly decreased the levels of phosphorylated proteins of mTOR

                      p70S6K and 4EBP1 leading to the inactivation of the mTOR signal transduction These data

                      demonstrate that mTOR signaling pathway also participates in the genistein-induced responses in

                      ovarian cancer cells

                      Genistein upregulates Nrf2 and HO-1 in the ovary of laying hens

                      It is well established that activation of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) is

                      one of the major mechanisms in the cellular defense against oxidative stress (43) Similar to

                      Nrf2 its downstream protein HO-1 has also a protective effect against oxidative stress (44) As

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      illustrated in Figure 6A-B significantly increased levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were observed in the

                      genistein-treated groups indicating that genistein exerts its chemopreventive effect on the ovary

                      by activating the Nrf2-induced cellular stress responses

                      DISCUSSION

                      Although surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions have improved the overall survival

                      rates effective treatment of ovarian cancer is limited due to the major challenges such as

                      clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity lack of early detection strategies for the disease

                      tumor recurrence and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (6-8 45) Therefore

                      chemoprevention of ovarian cancer by non-toxic naturally occurring or synthetic agents

                      provides a rational approach to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer

                      Epidemiological studies have shown that the dietary intake of soybean is associated with reduced

                      risks of various types of cancer including ovarian cancer (46) Genistein the most abundant

                      isoflavone in soybean has been reported to play a key role in the prevention of ovarian cancer

                      (17-23) Although numerous epidemiological and in vitro studies have demonstrated that

                      genistein is an effective anti-tumor agent in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer there is a

                      lack of well-characterized studies that address the efficacy and mechanisms of action of genistein

                      in a biologically relevant in vivo model of spontaneous ovarian carcinogenesis In the present

                      study therefore we utilized the laying hen model to prospectively test the chemopreventive

                      effects of genistein on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer and to further investigate the

                      molecular mechanisms underlying the actions of genistein on the initiation and progression of

                      ovarian cancer

                      Laying hens have been shown to develop spontaneous ovarian cancer at a high rate

                      providing an appropriate natural experimental model of human ovarian cancer (25) The fact that

                      laying hens and humans share some similarities in reproductive physiology and hens have also

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

                      induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

                      classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

                      humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

                      observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

                      cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

                      factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

                      antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

                      Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

                      identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

                      the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

                      been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

                      contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

                      To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

                      chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

                      study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

                      intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

                      demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

                      ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

                      addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

                      was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

                      ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

                      prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

                      hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

                      of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

                      genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

                      that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

                      It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

                      associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

                      first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

                      control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

                      a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

                      exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

                      Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

                      inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

                      which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

                      NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

                      known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

                      Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

                      cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

                      Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

                      κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

                      adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

                      including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

                      suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

                      significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

                      the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

                      ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

                      factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

                      protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

                      activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

                      activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

                      kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

                      resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

                      motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

                      that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

                      and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

                      that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

                      PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

                      Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

                      protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

                      cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

                      associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

                      proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

                      Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

                      allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

                      (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

                      activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

                      associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

                      demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

                      master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

                      Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

                      prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

                      Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

                      expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

                      involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

                      In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

                      that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

                      modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

                      and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

                      biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

                      protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

                      improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      REFERENCES

                      1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

                      2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

                      Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

                      characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

                      221709-1721

                      3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

                      Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

                      Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

                      subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

                      2008 145198-5208

                      4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

                      carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

                      5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

                      6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

                      G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

                      7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

                      J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

                      8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

                      7573-584

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

                      reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

                      10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

                      gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

                      1161697-1705

                      11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

                      Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

                      Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

                      12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

                      H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

                      Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

                      cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

                      13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

                      Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

                      apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

                      14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

                      Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

                      pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

                      to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

                      15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

                      16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

                      Ljunggren

                      J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

                      beta

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

                      17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

                      estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

                      18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

                      Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

                      growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

                      261193-204

                      19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

                      human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

                      20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

                      arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

                      pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

                      21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

                      induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

                      2007 10523-30

                      22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

                      ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

                      23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

                      Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

                      24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

                      Cancer 2003 13405-12

                      25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                      Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                      preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                      27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                      chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                      28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                      spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                      29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                      Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                      adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                      2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                      30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                      Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                      preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                      81373-379

                      31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                      egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                      32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                      dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                      33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                      cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                      34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                      of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                      isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                      2010621001-1005

                      36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                      Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                      37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                      human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                      38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                      antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                      2016951088-95

                      39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                      mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                      cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                      40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                      fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                      41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                      autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                      Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                      42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                      1945

                      43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                      Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                      induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                      Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                      culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                      45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                      46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                      KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                      future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                      47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                      of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                      48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                      CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                      112171-178

                      49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                      proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                      50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                      ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                      51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                      hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                      52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                      pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                      53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                      54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                      kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                      cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                      18334-342

                      56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                      SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                      convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                      57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                      Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                      NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                      58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                      cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                      59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                      Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                      Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                      cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                      60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                      149274-293

                      61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                      electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                      62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                      in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                      63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                      6636-44

                      64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                      Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                      analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                      65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                      epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                      2012 271918-1924

                      66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                      AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                      cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                      67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                      Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                      68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                      with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                      69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                      tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                      Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                      Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                      Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                      common classification

                      Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                      pattern present but not distinct

                      Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                      common classification

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                      Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                      X2 301 5248 10626

                      Tumor ()

                      Incidence

                      Reduction

                      30100

                      30

                      -

                      19100

                      19

                      -367

                      10100

                      10

                      -667

                      0002

                      X2=12701

                      Serous carcinoma ()

                      Incidence

                      Reduction

                      19100

                      19

                      -

                      11100

                      11

                      -421

                      6100

                      6

                      -684

                      0017

                      X2=8144

                      Mucinous carcinoma ()

                      Incidence

                      Reduction

                      11100

                      11

                      -

                      8100

                      8

                      -273

                      4100

                      4

                      -636

                      0175

                      X2=3485

                      Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                      Grade 1 530

                      167

                      719

                      368

                      510

                      500

                      0084

                      X2=4943

                      Grade 2 1830

                      600

                      819

                      421

                      310

                      300

                      0196

                      X2=3258

                      Grade 3 730

                      233

                      419

                      211

                      210

                      200

                      0968

                      X2=0064

                      Number of tumors1 37100

                      19100 10100 00001

                      Sizehen mm1

                      281plusmn050a

                      109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                      b 00001

                      Sizehen with tumors only

                      mm1

                      686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                      Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                      Survival () 83100

                      83

                      88100

                      88

                      91100

                      91

                      0228

                      X2=2953

                      1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                      superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      FIGURE LEGENDS

                      Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                      ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                      Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                      Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                      original magnification x40

                      Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                      daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                      a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                      Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                      expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                      blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                      same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                      Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                      C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                      representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                      percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                      significantly ( P lt 005)

                      Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                      tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                      same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      Figure 1 Cancer Research

                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      Figure 2 Cancer Research

                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      301 5248 10626

                      0

                      100

                      200

                      300

                      400

                      500

                      c

                      b

                      a

                      A

                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                      Gen

                      iste

                      in n

                      mo

                      ll

                      301 5248 10626

                      0

                      20

                      40

                      60

                      80

                      B

                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                      Dai

                      dze

                      in n

                      mo

                      ll

                      301 5248 10626

                      0

                      1

                      2

                      3

                      4a

                      b

                      c

                      C

                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                      Ova

                      ry M

                      DA

                      n

                      mo

                      lm

                      g p

                      rote

                      in

                      Figure 3 Cancer Research

                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      Figure 4 Cancer Research

                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      301 5248 10626

                      0

                      50

                      100

                      150

                      a

                      b

                      c

                      A

                      -actin

                      p-mTOR

                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                      p-m

                      TO

                      R

                      pe

                      rce

                      nt

                      of

                      co

                      ntr

                      ol

                      301 5248 10626

                      0

                      50

                      100

                      150

                      a

                      b

                      c

                      B

                      -actin

                      p-p70S6K1

                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                      p-p

                      70

                      S6

                      K1

                      p

                      erc

                      en

                      t o

                      f co

                      ntr

                      ol

                      301 5248 10626

                      0

                      50

                      100

                      150

                      a

                      b

                      c

                      C

                      -actin

                      p-4E-BP1

                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                      p-4

                      E-B

                      P1

                      p

                      erc

                      en

                      t o

                      f co

                      ntr

                      ol

                      Figure 5 Cancer Research

                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      301 5248 10626

                      0

                      50

                      100

                      150

                      200

                      250

                      c

                      b

                      a

                      A

                      -actin

                      Nrf2

                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                      Nrf

                      2

                      pe

                      rce

                      nt

                      of

                      co

                      ntr

                      ol

                      301 5248 10626

                      0

                      50

                      100

                      150

                      200

                      250

                      c

                      b

                      a

                      B

                      -actin

                      HO-1

                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                      HO

                      -1 p

                      erc

                      en

                      t o

                      f co

                      ntr

                      ol

                      Figure 6 Cancer Research

                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                      Updated version

                      1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                      Access the most recent version of this article at

                      Material

                      Supplementary

                      89DC1

                      httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                      Manuscript

                      Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                      E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                      Subscriptions

                      Reprints and

                      pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                      To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                      Permissions

                      Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                      89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                      • Article File
                      • Figure 1
                      • Figure 2
                      • Figures 3-6

                        illustrated in Figure 6A-B significantly increased levels of Nrf2 and HO-1 were observed in the

                        genistein-treated groups indicating that genistein exerts its chemopreventive effect on the ovary

                        by activating the Nrf2-induced cellular stress responses

                        DISCUSSION

                        Although surgical and chemotherapeutic interventions have improved the overall survival

                        rates effective treatment of ovarian cancer is limited due to the major challenges such as

                        clinicopathological and genetic heterogeneity lack of early detection strategies for the disease

                        tumor recurrence and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic drugs (6-8 45) Therefore

                        chemoprevention of ovarian cancer by non-toxic naturally occurring or synthetic agents

                        provides a rational approach to reduce the incidence and mortality rates of ovarian cancer

                        Epidemiological studies have shown that the dietary intake of soybean is associated with reduced

                        risks of various types of cancer including ovarian cancer (46) Genistein the most abundant

                        isoflavone in soybean has been reported to play a key role in the prevention of ovarian cancer

                        (17-23) Although numerous epidemiological and in vitro studies have demonstrated that

                        genistein is an effective anti-tumor agent in the chemoprevention of ovarian cancer there is a

                        lack of well-characterized studies that address the efficacy and mechanisms of action of genistein

                        in a biologically relevant in vivo model of spontaneous ovarian carcinogenesis In the present

                        study therefore we utilized the laying hen model to prospectively test the chemopreventive

                        effects of genistein on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer and to further investigate the

                        molecular mechanisms underlying the actions of genistein on the initiation and progression of

                        ovarian cancer

                        Laying hens have been shown to develop spontaneous ovarian cancer at a high rate

                        providing an appropriate natural experimental model of human ovarian cancer (25) The fact that

                        laying hens and humans share some similarities in reproductive physiology and hens have also

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

                        induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

                        classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

                        humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

                        observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

                        cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

                        factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

                        antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

                        Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

                        identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

                        the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

                        been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

                        contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

                        To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

                        chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

                        study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

                        intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

                        demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

                        ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

                        addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

                        was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

                        ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

                        prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

                        hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

                        of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

                        genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

                        that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

                        It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

                        associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

                        first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

                        control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

                        a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

                        exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

                        Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

                        inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

                        which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

                        NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

                        known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

                        Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

                        cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

                        Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

                        κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

                        adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

                        including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

                        suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

                        significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

                        the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

                        ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

                        factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

                        protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

                        activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

                        activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

                        kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

                        resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

                        motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

                        that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

                        and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

                        that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

                        PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

                        Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

                        protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

                        cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

                        associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

                        proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

                        Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

                        allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

                        (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

                        activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

                        associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

                        demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

                        master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

                        Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

                        prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

                        Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

                        expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

                        involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

                        In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

                        that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

                        modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

                        and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

                        biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

                        protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

                        improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        REFERENCES

                        1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

                        2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

                        Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

                        characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

                        221709-1721

                        3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

                        Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

                        Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

                        subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

                        2008 145198-5208

                        4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

                        carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

                        5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

                        6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

                        G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

                        7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

                        J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

                        8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

                        7573-584

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

                        reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

                        10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

                        gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

                        1161697-1705

                        11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

                        Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

                        Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

                        12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

                        H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

                        Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

                        cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

                        13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

                        Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

                        apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

                        14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

                        Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

                        pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

                        to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

                        15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

                        16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

                        Ljunggren

                        J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

                        beta

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

                        17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

                        estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

                        18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

                        Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

                        growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

                        261193-204

                        19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

                        human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

                        20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

                        arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

                        pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

                        21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

                        induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

                        2007 10523-30

                        22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

                        ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

                        23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

                        Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

                        24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

                        Cancer 2003 13405-12

                        25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                        Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                        preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                        27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                        chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                        28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                        spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                        29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                        Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                        adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                        2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                        30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                        Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                        preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                        81373-379

                        31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                        egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                        32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                        dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                        33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                        cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                        34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                        of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                        isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                        2010621001-1005

                        36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                        Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                        37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                        human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                        38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                        antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                        2016951088-95

                        39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                        mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                        cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                        40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                        fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                        41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                        autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                        Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                        42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                        1945

                        43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                        Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                        induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                        Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                        culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                        45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                        46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                        KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                        future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                        47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                        of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                        48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                        CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                        112171-178

                        49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                        proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                        50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                        ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                        51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                        hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                        52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                        pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                        53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                        54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                        kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                        cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                        18334-342

                        56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                        SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                        convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                        57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                        Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                        NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                        58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                        cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                        59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                        Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                        Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                        cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                        60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                        149274-293

                        61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                        electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                        62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                        in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                        63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                        6636-44

                        64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                        Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                        analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                        65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                        epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                        2012 271918-1924

                        66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                        AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                        cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                        67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                        Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                        68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                        with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                        69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                        tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                        Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                        Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                        Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                        common classification

                        Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                        pattern present but not distinct

                        Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                        common classification

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                        Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                        X2 301 5248 10626

                        Tumor ()

                        Incidence

                        Reduction

                        30100

                        30

                        -

                        19100

                        19

                        -367

                        10100

                        10

                        -667

                        0002

                        X2=12701

                        Serous carcinoma ()

                        Incidence

                        Reduction

                        19100

                        19

                        -

                        11100

                        11

                        -421

                        6100

                        6

                        -684

                        0017

                        X2=8144

                        Mucinous carcinoma ()

                        Incidence

                        Reduction

                        11100

                        11

                        -

                        8100

                        8

                        -273

                        4100

                        4

                        -636

                        0175

                        X2=3485

                        Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                        Grade 1 530

                        167

                        719

                        368

                        510

                        500

                        0084

                        X2=4943

                        Grade 2 1830

                        600

                        819

                        421

                        310

                        300

                        0196

                        X2=3258

                        Grade 3 730

                        233

                        419

                        211

                        210

                        200

                        0968

                        X2=0064

                        Number of tumors1 37100

                        19100 10100 00001

                        Sizehen mm1

                        281plusmn050a

                        109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                        b 00001

                        Sizehen with tumors only

                        mm1

                        686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                        Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                        Survival () 83100

                        83

                        88100

                        88

                        91100

                        91

                        0228

                        X2=2953

                        1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                        superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        FIGURE LEGENDS

                        Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                        ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                        Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                        Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                        original magnification x40

                        Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                        daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                        a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                        Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                        expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                        blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                        same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                        Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                        C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                        representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                        percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                        significantly ( P lt 005)

                        Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                        tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                        same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        Figure 1 Cancer Research

                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        Figure 2 Cancer Research

                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        301 5248 10626

                        0

                        100

                        200

                        300

                        400

                        500

                        c

                        b

                        a

                        A

                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                        Gen

                        iste

                        in n

                        mo

                        ll

                        301 5248 10626

                        0

                        20

                        40

                        60

                        80

                        B

                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                        Dai

                        dze

                        in n

                        mo

                        ll

                        301 5248 10626

                        0

                        1

                        2

                        3

                        4a

                        b

                        c

                        C

                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                        Ova

                        ry M

                        DA

                        n

                        mo

                        lm

                        g p

                        rote

                        in

                        Figure 3 Cancer Research

                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        Figure 4 Cancer Research

                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        301 5248 10626

                        0

                        50

                        100

                        150

                        a

                        b

                        c

                        A

                        -actin

                        p-mTOR

                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                        p-m

                        TO

                        R

                        pe

                        rce

                        nt

                        of

                        co

                        ntr

                        ol

                        301 5248 10626

                        0

                        50

                        100

                        150

                        a

                        b

                        c

                        B

                        -actin

                        p-p70S6K1

                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                        p-p

                        70

                        S6

                        K1

                        p

                        erc

                        en

                        t o

                        f co

                        ntr

                        ol

                        301 5248 10626

                        0

                        50

                        100

                        150

                        a

                        b

                        c

                        C

                        -actin

                        p-4E-BP1

                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                        p-4

                        E-B

                        P1

                        p

                        erc

                        en

                        t o

                        f co

                        ntr

                        ol

                        Figure 5 Cancer Research

                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        301 5248 10626

                        0

                        50

                        100

                        150

                        200

                        250

                        c

                        b

                        a

                        A

                        -actin

                        Nrf2

                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                        Nrf

                        2

                        pe

                        rce

                        nt

                        of

                        co

                        ntr

                        ol

                        301 5248 10626

                        0

                        50

                        100

                        150

                        200

                        250

                        c

                        b

                        a

                        B

                        -actin

                        HO-1

                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                        HO

                        -1 p

                        erc

                        en

                        t o

                        f co

                        ntr

                        ol

                        Figure 6 Cancer Research

                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                        Updated version

                        1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                        Access the most recent version of this article at

                        Material

                        Supplementary

                        89DC1

                        httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                        Manuscript

                        Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                        E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                        Subscriptions

                        Reprints and

                        pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                        To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                        Permissions

                        Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                        89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                        • Article File
                        • Figure 1
                        • Figure 2
                        • Figures 3-6

                          high ovulatory rates led to the possibility of a similar pathogenesis associated with ovulation-

                          induced DNA damage to ovarian cells in both hen and human ovarian cancers (47) Histological

                          classification of ovarian tumors based on the tumor stage and grade have indicated that similar to

                          humans four subtypes including serous endometrioid mucinous and clear cell carcinomas are

                          observed in hens (26) Recent studies have reported that several biomarkers of human ovarian

                          cancer are also expressed in ovarian tumors of hens including cytokeratin epidermal growth

                          factor receptor (EGFR) cytochrome P450 family member CYP1B1 proliferating cell nuclear

                          antigen (PCNA) vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) CA125 and HER2 (28 30 48 49)

                          Moreover as in human ovarian tumors molecular alterations in p53 and Ras genes have been

                          identified in ovarian tumors of hens (29) Based on the findings validating that ovarian cancer in

                          the laying hen model recapitulates the etiology and disease progression in human hens have

                          been previously used in studies testing the effects of chemopreventive agents such as oral

                          contraceptives aspirin and flaxseed in the prevention of ovarian cancer (50 51)

                          To the best of our knowledge the present study is the first study to investigate the

                          chemopreventive effects of genistein in the laying hen model of ovarian cancer In this pilot

                          study we conducted a three-armed randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of genistein

                          intervention on the incidence of spontaneous ovarian cancer in laying hens Our data

                          demonstrated that genistein significantly and dose-dependently reduced the incidence rate of

                          ovarian cancer consistent with previously published epidemiological and in vitro findings In

                          addition we observed an increased survival rate in genistein-treated animals although the effect

                          was not significant Histological analysis of the ovarian tumors revealed that two subtypes of

                          ovarian cancer serous and mucinous carcinomas were observed in these hens However the

                          prevalence of different subtypes did not significantly vary between control and genistein-treated

                          hens Genistein intake also significantly decreased the number and size of ovarian tumors in

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

                          of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

                          genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

                          that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

                          It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

                          associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

                          first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

                          control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

                          a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

                          exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

                          Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

                          inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

                          which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

                          NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

                          known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

                          Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

                          cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

                          Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

                          κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

                          adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

                          including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

                          suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

                          significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

                          the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

                          ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

                          factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

                          protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

                          activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

                          activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

                          kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

                          resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

                          motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

                          that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

                          and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

                          that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

                          PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

                          Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

                          protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

                          cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

                          associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

                          proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

                          Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

                          allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

                          (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

                          activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

                          associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

                          demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

                          master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

                          Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

                          prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

                          Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

                          expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

                          involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

                          In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

                          that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

                          modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

                          and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

                          biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

                          protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

                          improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          REFERENCES

                          1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

                          2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

                          Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

                          characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

                          221709-1721

                          3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

                          Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

                          Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

                          subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

                          2008 145198-5208

                          4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

                          carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

                          5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

                          6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

                          G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

                          7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

                          J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

                          8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

                          7573-584

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

                          reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

                          10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

                          gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

                          1161697-1705

                          11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

                          Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

                          Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

                          12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

                          H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

                          Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

                          cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

                          13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

                          Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

                          apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

                          14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

                          Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

                          pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

                          to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

                          15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

                          16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

                          Ljunggren

                          J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

                          beta

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

                          17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

                          estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

                          18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

                          Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

                          growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

                          261193-204

                          19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

                          human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

                          20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

                          arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

                          pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

                          21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

                          induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

                          2007 10523-30

                          22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

                          ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

                          23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

                          Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

                          24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

                          Cancer 2003 13405-12

                          25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                          Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                          preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                          27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                          chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                          28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                          spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                          29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                          Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                          adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                          2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                          30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                          Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                          preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                          81373-379

                          31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                          egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                          32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                          dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                          33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                          cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                          34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                          of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                          isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                          2010621001-1005

                          36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                          Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                          37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                          human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                          38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                          antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                          2016951088-95

                          39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                          mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                          cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                          40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                          fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                          41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                          autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                          Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                          42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                          1945

                          43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                          Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                          induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                          Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                          culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                          45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                          46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                          KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                          future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                          47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                          of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                          48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                          CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                          112171-178

                          49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                          proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                          50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                          ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                          51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                          hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                          52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                          pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                          53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                          54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                          kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                          cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                          18334-342

                          56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                          SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                          convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                          57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                          Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                          NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                          58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                          cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                          59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                          Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                          Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                          cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                          60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                          149274-293

                          61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                          electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                          62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                          in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                          63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                          6636-44

                          64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                          Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                          analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                          65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                          epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                          2012 271918-1924

                          66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                          AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                          cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                          67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                          Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                          68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                          with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                          69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                          tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                          Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                          Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                          Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                          common classification

                          Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                          pattern present but not distinct

                          Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                          common classification

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                          Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                          X2 301 5248 10626

                          Tumor ()

                          Incidence

                          Reduction

                          30100

                          30

                          -

                          19100

                          19

                          -367

                          10100

                          10

                          -667

                          0002

                          X2=12701

                          Serous carcinoma ()

                          Incidence

                          Reduction

                          19100

                          19

                          -

                          11100

                          11

                          -421

                          6100

                          6

                          -684

                          0017

                          X2=8144

                          Mucinous carcinoma ()

                          Incidence

                          Reduction

                          11100

                          11

                          -

                          8100

                          8

                          -273

                          4100

                          4

                          -636

                          0175

                          X2=3485

                          Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                          Grade 1 530

                          167

                          719

                          368

                          510

                          500

                          0084

                          X2=4943

                          Grade 2 1830

                          600

                          819

                          421

                          310

                          300

                          0196

                          X2=3258

                          Grade 3 730

                          233

                          419

                          211

                          210

                          200

                          0968

                          X2=0064

                          Number of tumors1 37100

                          19100 10100 00001

                          Sizehen mm1

                          281plusmn050a

                          109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                          b 00001

                          Sizehen with tumors only

                          mm1

                          686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                          Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                          Survival () 83100

                          83

                          88100

                          88

                          91100

                          91

                          0228

                          X2=2953

                          1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                          superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          FIGURE LEGENDS

                          Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                          ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                          Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                          Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                          original magnification x40

                          Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                          daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                          a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                          Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                          expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                          blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                          same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                          Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                          C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                          representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                          percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                          significantly ( P lt 005)

                          Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                          tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                          same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          Figure 1 Cancer Research

                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          Figure 2 Cancer Research

                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          301 5248 10626

                          0

                          100

                          200

                          300

                          400

                          500

                          c

                          b

                          a

                          A

                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                          Gen

                          iste

                          in n

                          mo

                          ll

                          301 5248 10626

                          0

                          20

                          40

                          60

                          80

                          B

                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                          Dai

                          dze

                          in n

                          mo

                          ll

                          301 5248 10626

                          0

                          1

                          2

                          3

                          4a

                          b

                          c

                          C

                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                          Ova

                          ry M

                          DA

                          n

                          mo

                          lm

                          g p

                          rote

                          in

                          Figure 3 Cancer Research

                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          Figure 4 Cancer Research

                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          301 5248 10626

                          0

                          50

                          100

                          150

                          a

                          b

                          c

                          A

                          -actin

                          p-mTOR

                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                          p-m

                          TO

                          R

                          pe

                          rce

                          nt

                          of

                          co

                          ntr

                          ol

                          301 5248 10626

                          0

                          50

                          100

                          150

                          a

                          b

                          c

                          B

                          -actin

                          p-p70S6K1

                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                          p-p

                          70

                          S6

                          K1

                          p

                          erc

                          en

                          t o

                          f co

                          ntr

                          ol

                          301 5248 10626

                          0

                          50

                          100

                          150

                          a

                          b

                          c

                          C

                          -actin

                          p-4E-BP1

                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                          p-4

                          E-B

                          P1

                          p

                          erc

                          en

                          t o

                          f co

                          ntr

                          ol

                          Figure 5 Cancer Research

                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          301 5248 10626

                          0

                          50

                          100

                          150

                          200

                          250

                          c

                          b

                          a

                          A

                          -actin

                          Nrf2

                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                          Nrf

                          2

                          pe

                          rce

                          nt

                          of

                          co

                          ntr

                          ol

                          301 5248 10626

                          0

                          50

                          100

                          150

                          200

                          250

                          c

                          b

                          a

                          B

                          -actin

                          HO-1

                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                          HO

                          -1 p

                          erc

                          en

                          t o

                          f co

                          ntr

                          ol

                          Figure 6 Cancer Research

                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                          Updated version

                          1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                          Access the most recent version of this article at

                          Material

                          Supplementary

                          89DC1

                          httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                          Manuscript

                          Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                          E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                          Subscriptions

                          Reprints and

                          pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                          To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                          Permissions

                          Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                          89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                          • Article File
                          • Figure 1
                          • Figure 2
                          • Figures 3-6

                            hens indicating the inhibitory effect of genistein on the growth of ovarian cancer cells Analysis

                            of genistein levels in the serum showed a dose-dependent increase in hens fed the diet containing

                            genistein whereas there was no change in the serum daidzein levels of these animals confirming

                            that the tumor inhibitory effect has been linked specifically to genistein

                            It is well documented that tumor initiation and progression in the ovary has been

                            associated with chronic inflammation which is activated by oxidative stress (52) Therefore we

                            first assessed the level of MDA which is a biomarker for oxidative stress in the ovaries of the

                            control and genistein-fed animals Our results showed that genistein supplementation resulted in

                            a significant dose-dependent reduction of MDA levels in the ovary suggesting that genistein

                            exerts its chemopreventive effects on the ovary via oxidative stress-induced signaling pathways

                            Based on this finding we hypothesized that genistein could ameliorate oxidative stress and

                            inflammatory responses in the ovary through regulation of NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 pathways

                            which are involved in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer

                            NF-κB signaling which is a critical molecular link between inflammation and cancer is

                            known to regulate key processes in several malignancies including ovarian cancer (53-55)

                            Activation of NF-κB cascade has been shown to correlate with clinical outcome in ovarian

                            cancer patients and is associated with growth and progression of ovarian tumors (56-58)

                            Analysis of gene expression microarrays in ovarian cancer cells treated with highly specific NF-

                            κB inhibitors revealed that NF-κB pathway regulates genes associated with cell proliferation

                            adhesion invasion angiogenesis and the creation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment

                            including TNF cytokine network (54) Targeting NF-κB pathway is therefore of interest in the

                            suppression of inflammatory processes Our data showed that genistein supplementation

                            significantly reduced the expression of NF-κB as well as its downstream targets Bcl-2 and Bax at

                            the protein level resulting in the induction of apoptosis

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

                            ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

                            factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

                            protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

                            activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

                            activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

                            kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

                            resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

                            motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

                            that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

                            and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

                            that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

                            PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

                            Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

                            protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

                            cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

                            associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

                            proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

                            Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

                            allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

                            (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

                            activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

                            associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

                            demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

                            master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

                            Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

                            prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

                            Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

                            expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

                            involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

                            In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

                            that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

                            modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

                            and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

                            biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

                            protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

                            improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            REFERENCES

                            1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

                            2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

                            Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

                            characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

                            221709-1721

                            3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

                            Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

                            Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

                            subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

                            2008 145198-5208

                            4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

                            carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

                            5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

                            6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

                            G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

                            7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

                            J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

                            8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

                            7573-584

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

                            reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

                            10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

                            gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

                            1161697-1705

                            11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

                            Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

                            Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

                            12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

                            H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

                            Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

                            cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

                            13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

                            Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

                            apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

                            14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

                            Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

                            pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

                            to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

                            15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

                            16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

                            Ljunggren

                            J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

                            beta

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

                            17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

                            estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

                            18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

                            Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

                            growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

                            261193-204

                            19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

                            human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

                            20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

                            arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

                            pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

                            21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

                            induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

                            2007 10523-30

                            22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

                            ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

                            23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

                            Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

                            24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

                            Cancer 2003 13405-12

                            25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                            Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                            preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                            27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                            chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                            28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                            spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                            29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                            Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                            adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                            2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                            30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                            Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                            preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                            81373-379

                            31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                            egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                            32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                            dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                            33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                            cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                            34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                            of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                            isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                            2010621001-1005

                            36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                            Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                            37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                            human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                            38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                            antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                            2016951088-95

                            39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                            mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                            cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                            40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                            fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                            41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                            autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                            Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                            42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                            1945

                            43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                            Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                            induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                            Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                            culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                            45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                            46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                            KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                            future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                            47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                            of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                            48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                            CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                            112171-178

                            49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                            proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                            50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                            ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                            51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                            hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                            52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                            pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                            53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                            54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                            kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                            cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                            18334-342

                            56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                            SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                            convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                            57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                            Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                            NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                            58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                            cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                            59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                            Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                            Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                            cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                            60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                            149274-293

                            61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                            electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                            62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                            in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                            63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                            6636-44

                            64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                            Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                            analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                            65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                            epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                            2012 271918-1924

                            66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                            AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                            cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                            67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                            Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                            68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                            with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                            69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                            tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                            Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                            Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                            Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                            common classification

                            Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                            pattern present but not distinct

                            Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                            common classification

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                            Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                            X2 301 5248 10626

                            Tumor ()

                            Incidence

                            Reduction

                            30100

                            30

                            -

                            19100

                            19

                            -367

                            10100

                            10

                            -667

                            0002

                            X2=12701

                            Serous carcinoma ()

                            Incidence

                            Reduction

                            19100

                            19

                            -

                            11100

                            11

                            -421

                            6100

                            6

                            -684

                            0017

                            X2=8144

                            Mucinous carcinoma ()

                            Incidence

                            Reduction

                            11100

                            11

                            -

                            8100

                            8

                            -273

                            4100

                            4

                            -636

                            0175

                            X2=3485

                            Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                            Grade 1 530

                            167

                            719

                            368

                            510

                            500

                            0084

                            X2=4943

                            Grade 2 1830

                            600

                            819

                            421

                            310

                            300

                            0196

                            X2=3258

                            Grade 3 730

                            233

                            419

                            211

                            210

                            200

                            0968

                            X2=0064

                            Number of tumors1 37100

                            19100 10100 00001

                            Sizehen mm1

                            281plusmn050a

                            109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                            b 00001

                            Sizehen with tumors only

                            mm1

                            686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                            Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                            Survival () 83100

                            83

                            88100

                            88

                            91100

                            91

                            0228

                            X2=2953

                            1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                            superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            FIGURE LEGENDS

                            Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                            ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                            Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                            Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                            original magnification x40

                            Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                            daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                            a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                            Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                            expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                            blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                            same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                            Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                            C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                            representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                            percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                            significantly ( P lt 005)

                            Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                            tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                            same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            Figure 1 Cancer Research

                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            Figure 2 Cancer Research

                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            301 5248 10626

                            0

                            100

                            200

                            300

                            400

                            500

                            c

                            b

                            a

                            A

                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                            Gen

                            iste

                            in n

                            mo

                            ll

                            301 5248 10626

                            0

                            20

                            40

                            60

                            80

                            B

                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                            Dai

                            dze

                            in n

                            mo

                            ll

                            301 5248 10626

                            0

                            1

                            2

                            3

                            4a

                            b

                            c

                            C

                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                            Ova

                            ry M

                            DA

                            n

                            mo

                            lm

                            g p

                            rote

                            in

                            Figure 3 Cancer Research

                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            Figure 4 Cancer Research

                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            301 5248 10626

                            0

                            50

                            100

                            150

                            a

                            b

                            c

                            A

                            -actin

                            p-mTOR

                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                            p-m

                            TO

                            R

                            pe

                            rce

                            nt

                            of

                            co

                            ntr

                            ol

                            301 5248 10626

                            0

                            50

                            100

                            150

                            a

                            b

                            c

                            B

                            -actin

                            p-p70S6K1

                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                            p-p

                            70

                            S6

                            K1

                            p

                            erc

                            en

                            t o

                            f co

                            ntr

                            ol

                            301 5248 10626

                            0

                            50

                            100

                            150

                            a

                            b

                            c

                            C

                            -actin

                            p-4E-BP1

                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                            p-4

                            E-B

                            P1

                            p

                            erc

                            en

                            t o

                            f co

                            ntr

                            ol

                            Figure 5 Cancer Research

                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            301 5248 10626

                            0

                            50

                            100

                            150

                            200

                            250

                            c

                            b

                            a

                            A

                            -actin

                            Nrf2

                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                            Nrf

                            2

                            pe

                            rce

                            nt

                            of

                            co

                            ntr

                            ol

                            301 5248 10626

                            0

                            50

                            100

                            150

                            200

                            250

                            c

                            b

                            a

                            B

                            -actin

                            HO-1

                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                            HO

                            -1 p

                            erc

                            en

                            t o

                            f co

                            ntr

                            ol

                            Figure 6 Cancer Research

                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                            Updated version

                            1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                            Access the most recent version of this article at

                            Material

                            Supplementary

                            89DC1

                            httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                            Manuscript

                            Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                            E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                            Subscriptions

                            Reprints and

                            pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                            To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                            Permissions

                            Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                            89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                            • Article File
                            • Figure 1
                            • Figure 2
                            • Figures 3-6

                              It has been reported that PI3KAKTmTOR signaling pathway is frequently activated in

                              ovarian cancer (59) It is a complex signaling network transducing signals from various growth

                              factors and cytokines (eg EGF heregulin and TGF) through receptor tyrosine kinases and G

                              protein-coupled receptors into intracellular messages by generating phospholipids which

                              activate downstream effectors including AKT and mTOR via phosphorylation (42) Once

                              activated mTOR phosphorylates two key translation-regulating factors ribosomal protein S6

                              kinase (p70S6K) and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4EBP1)

                              resulting in increased translation of target genes involved in cell cycle cell survival metabolism

                              motility angiogenesis chemoresistance and genomic instability (60) In our study we observed

                              that genistein significantly reduced the activation of mTOR and its downstream targets p70S6K

                              and 4EBP1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of these proteins in ovarian cancer cells suggesting

                              that genistein may have the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapeutic agents that target

                              PI3KAKTmTOR signaling cascade in ovarian cancer cells

                              Nrf2 signaling pathway has been shown as one of the major defense mechanisms to

                              protect cells against oxidative stress (61) Under basal conditions Nrf2 is present in the

                              cytoplasm and kept transcriptionally inactive through binding to its inhibitor Kelch like-ECH-

                              associated protein 1 (Keap1) which targets Nrf2 to ubiquitination and the subsequent

                              proteasomal degradation (62 63) In the presence of oxidative stress the cysteine residues of

                              Keap1 become oxidized resulting in disruption of the Nrf2-Keap1 complex This dissociation

                              allows the translocation of Nrf2 to the nucleus where it binds to antioxidant response elements

                              (AREs) resulting in the transcription of its downstream target genes (64) Interestingly aberrant

                              activation of Nrf2 is also observed in ovarian cancer and high levels of Nrf2 expression are

                              associated with poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer (65) Recent studies have

                              demonstrated that not only healthy cells but also various cancer cells including ovarian tumors

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

                              master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

                              Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

                              prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

                              Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

                              expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

                              involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

                              In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

                              that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

                              modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

                              and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

                              biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

                              protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

                              improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              REFERENCES

                              1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

                              2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

                              Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

                              characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

                              221709-1721

                              3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

                              Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

                              Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

                              subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

                              2008 145198-5208

                              4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

                              carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

                              5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

                              6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

                              G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

                              7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

                              J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

                              8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

                              7573-584

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

                              reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

                              10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

                              gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

                              1161697-1705

                              11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

                              Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

                              Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

                              12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

                              H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

                              Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

                              cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

                              13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

                              Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

                              apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

                              14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

                              Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

                              pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

                              to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

                              15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

                              16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

                              Ljunggren

                              J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

                              beta

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

                              17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

                              estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

                              18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

                              Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

                              growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

                              261193-204

                              19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

                              human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

                              20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

                              arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

                              pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

                              21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

                              induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

                              2007 10523-30

                              22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

                              ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

                              23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

                              Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

                              24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

                              Cancer 2003 13405-12

                              25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                              Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                              preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                              27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                              chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                              28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                              spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                              29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                              Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                              adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                              2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                              30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                              Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                              preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                              81373-379

                              31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                              egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                              32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                              dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                              33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                              cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                              34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                              of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                              isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                              2010621001-1005

                              36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                              Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                              37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                              human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                              38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                              antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                              2016951088-95

                              39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                              mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                              cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                              40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                              fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                              41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                              autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                              Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                              42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                              1945

                              43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                              Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                              induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                              Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                              culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                              45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                              46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                              KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                              future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                              47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                              of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                              48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                              CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                              112171-178

                              49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                              proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                              50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                              ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                              51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                              hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                              52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                              pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                              53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                              54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                              kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                              cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                              18334-342

                              56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                              SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                              convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                              57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                              Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                              NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                              58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                              cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                              59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                              Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                              Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                              cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                              60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                              149274-293

                              61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                              electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                              62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                              in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                              63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                              6636-44

                              64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                              Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                              analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                              65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                              epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                              2012 271918-1924

                              66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                              AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                              cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                              67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                              Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                              68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                              with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                              69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                              tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                              Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                              Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                              Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                              common classification

                              Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                              pattern present but not distinct

                              Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                              common classification

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                              Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                              X2 301 5248 10626

                              Tumor ()

                              Incidence

                              Reduction

                              30100

                              30

                              -

                              19100

                              19

                              -367

                              10100

                              10

                              -667

                              0002

                              X2=12701

                              Serous carcinoma ()

                              Incidence

                              Reduction

                              19100

                              19

                              -

                              11100

                              11

                              -421

                              6100

                              6

                              -684

                              0017

                              X2=8144

                              Mucinous carcinoma ()

                              Incidence

                              Reduction

                              11100

                              11

                              -

                              8100

                              8

                              -273

                              4100

                              4

                              -636

                              0175

                              X2=3485

                              Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                              Grade 1 530

                              167

                              719

                              368

                              510

                              500

                              0084

                              X2=4943

                              Grade 2 1830

                              600

                              819

                              421

                              310

                              300

                              0196

                              X2=3258

                              Grade 3 730

                              233

                              419

                              211

                              210

                              200

                              0968

                              X2=0064

                              Number of tumors1 37100

                              19100 10100 00001

                              Sizehen mm1

                              281plusmn050a

                              109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                              b 00001

                              Sizehen with tumors only

                              mm1

                              686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                              Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                              Survival () 83100

                              83

                              88100

                              88

                              91100

                              91

                              0228

                              X2=2953

                              1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                              superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              FIGURE LEGENDS

                              Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                              ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                              Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                              Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                              original magnification x40

                              Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                              daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                              a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                              Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                              expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                              blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                              same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                              Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                              C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                              representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                              percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                              significantly ( P lt 005)

                              Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                              tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                              same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              Figure 1 Cancer Research

                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              Figure 2 Cancer Research

                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              301 5248 10626

                              0

                              100

                              200

                              300

                              400

                              500

                              c

                              b

                              a

                              A

                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                              Gen

                              iste

                              in n

                              mo

                              ll

                              301 5248 10626

                              0

                              20

                              40

                              60

                              80

                              B

                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                              Dai

                              dze

                              in n

                              mo

                              ll

                              301 5248 10626

                              0

                              1

                              2

                              3

                              4a

                              b

                              c

                              C

                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                              Ova

                              ry M

                              DA

                              n

                              mo

                              lm

                              g p

                              rote

                              in

                              Figure 3 Cancer Research

                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              Figure 4 Cancer Research

                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              301 5248 10626

                              0

                              50

                              100

                              150

                              a

                              b

                              c

                              A

                              -actin

                              p-mTOR

                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                              p-m

                              TO

                              R

                              pe

                              rce

                              nt

                              of

                              co

                              ntr

                              ol

                              301 5248 10626

                              0

                              50

                              100

                              150

                              a

                              b

                              c

                              B

                              -actin

                              p-p70S6K1

                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                              p-p

                              70

                              S6

                              K1

                              p

                              erc

                              en

                              t o

                              f co

                              ntr

                              ol

                              301 5248 10626

                              0

                              50

                              100

                              150

                              a

                              b

                              c

                              C

                              -actin

                              p-4E-BP1

                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                              p-4

                              E-B

                              P1

                              p

                              erc

                              en

                              t o

                              f co

                              ntr

                              ol

                              Figure 5 Cancer Research

                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              301 5248 10626

                              0

                              50

                              100

                              150

                              200

                              250

                              c

                              b

                              a

                              A

                              -actin

                              Nrf2

                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                              Nrf

                              2

                              pe

                              rce

                              nt

                              of

                              co

                              ntr

                              ol

                              301 5248 10626

                              0

                              50

                              100

                              150

                              200

                              250

                              c

                              b

                              a

                              B

                              -actin

                              HO-1

                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                              HO

                              -1 p

                              erc

                              en

                              t o

                              f co

                              ntr

                              ol

                              Figure 6 Cancer Research

                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                              Updated version

                              1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                              Access the most recent version of this article at

                              Material

                              Supplementary

                              89DC1

                              httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                              Manuscript

                              Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                              E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                              Subscriptions

                              Reprints and

                              pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                              To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                              Permissions

                              Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                              89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                              • Article File
                              • Figure 1
                              • Figure 2
                              • Figures 3-6

                                can protect themselves against oxidative stress by activating the transcription factor Nrf2 the

                                master regulator of antioxidant genes suggesting a dual role of Nrf2 in carcinogenesis (66 67)

                                Therefore these findings may suggest that activation of Nrf2 could be utilized as a cancer

                                prevention strategy whereas inhibition of Nrf2 could be effective in cancer treatment (68 69)

                                Our results showed that genistein intervention significantly and dose-dependently increased the

                                expression levels of Nrf2 and its downstream target HO-1 in hen ovarian tumors indicating the

                                involvement of antioxidant activity of genistein in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer

                                In conclusion our findings in laying hen model of spontaneous ovarian cancer indicate

                                that genistein is a potent agent in chemoprevention of ovarian cancer through acting its effects by

                                modulating NF-κB mTOR and Nrf2 signaling pathways These results provide further support

                                and mechanistic insights into the chemopreventive effects of genistein on ovarian cancer in a

                                biologically relevant in vivo model providing a strong rationale for clinical studies to assess the

                                protective effects of genistein which may ultimately lead to better clinical outcomes and

                                improved overall survival rates for patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                REFERENCES

                                1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

                                2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

                                Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

                                characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

                                221709-1721

                                3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

                                Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

                                Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

                                subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

                                2008 145198-5208

                                4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

                                carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

                                5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

                                6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

                                G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

                                7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

                                J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

                                8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

                                7573-584

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

                                reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

                                10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

                                gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

                                1161697-1705

                                11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

                                Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

                                Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

                                12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

                                H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

                                Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

                                cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

                                13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

                                Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

                                apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

                                14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

                                Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

                                pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

                                to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

                                15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

                                16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

                                Ljunggren

                                J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

                                beta

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

                                17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

                                estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

                                18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

                                Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

                                growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

                                261193-204

                                19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

                                human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

                                20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

                                arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

                                pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

                                21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

                                induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

                                2007 10523-30

                                22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

                                ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

                                23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

                                Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

                                24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

                                Cancer 2003 13405-12

                                25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                                Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                                preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                                27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                                chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                                28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                                spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                                29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                                Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                                adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                                2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                                30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                                Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                                preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                                81373-379

                                31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                                egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                                32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                                dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                                33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                                cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                                34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                                of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                                isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                                2010621001-1005

                                36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                                Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                                37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                                human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                                38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                                antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                                2016951088-95

                                39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                                mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                                cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                                40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                                fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                                41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                                autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                                Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                                42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                                1945

                                43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                                Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                                induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                                Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                                culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                                45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                                46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                                KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                                future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                                47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                                of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                                48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                                CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                                112171-178

                                49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                                proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                                50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                                ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                                51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                                hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                                52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                                pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                                53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                                54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                                kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                                cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                                18334-342

                                56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                                SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                                convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                                57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                                Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                                NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                                58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                                cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                                59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                                Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                                Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                                cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                                60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                                149274-293

                                61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                                electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                                62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                                in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                                63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                                6636-44

                                64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                                Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                                analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                                65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                                epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                                2012 271918-1924

                                66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                                AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                                cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                                67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                                Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                                68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                                with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                                69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                                tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                                Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                                Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                                Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                                common classification

                                Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                                pattern present but not distinct

                                Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                                common classification

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                                Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                                X2 301 5248 10626

                                Tumor ()

                                Incidence

                                Reduction

                                30100

                                30

                                -

                                19100

                                19

                                -367

                                10100

                                10

                                -667

                                0002

                                X2=12701

                                Serous carcinoma ()

                                Incidence

                                Reduction

                                19100

                                19

                                -

                                11100

                                11

                                -421

                                6100

                                6

                                -684

                                0017

                                X2=8144

                                Mucinous carcinoma ()

                                Incidence

                                Reduction

                                11100

                                11

                                -

                                8100

                                8

                                -273

                                4100

                                4

                                -636

                                0175

                                X2=3485

                                Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                                Grade 1 530

                                167

                                719

                                368

                                510

                                500

                                0084

                                X2=4943

                                Grade 2 1830

                                600

                                819

                                421

                                310

                                300

                                0196

                                X2=3258

                                Grade 3 730

                                233

                                419

                                211

                                210

                                200

                                0968

                                X2=0064

                                Number of tumors1 37100

                                19100 10100 00001

                                Sizehen mm1

                                281plusmn050a

                                109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                                b 00001

                                Sizehen with tumors only

                                mm1

                                686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                                Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                                Survival () 83100

                                83

                                88100

                                88

                                91100

                                91

                                0228

                                X2=2953

                                1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                                superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                FIGURE LEGENDS

                                Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                                ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                                Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                                Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                                original magnification x40

                                Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                                daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                                a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                                expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                                blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                                C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                                representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                                percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                                significantly ( P lt 005)

                                Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                                tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                301 5248 10626

                                0

                                100

                                200

                                300

                                400

                                500

                                c

                                b

                                a

                                A

                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                Gen

                                iste

                                in n

                                mo

                                ll

                                301 5248 10626

                                0

                                20

                                40

                                60

                                80

                                B

                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                Dai

                                dze

                                in n

                                mo

                                ll

                                301 5248 10626

                                0

                                1

                                2

                                3

                                4a

                                b

                                c

                                C

                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                Ova

                                ry M

                                DA

                                n

                                mo

                                lm

                                g p

                                rote

                                in

                                Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                301 5248 10626

                                0

                                50

                                100

                                150

                                a

                                b

                                c

                                A

                                -actin

                                p-mTOR

                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                p-m

                                TO

                                R

                                pe

                                rce

                                nt

                                of

                                co

                                ntr

                                ol

                                301 5248 10626

                                0

                                50

                                100

                                150

                                a

                                b

                                c

                                B

                                -actin

                                p-p70S6K1

                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                p-p

                                70

                                S6

                                K1

                                p

                                erc

                                en

                                t o

                                f co

                                ntr

                                ol

                                301 5248 10626

                                0

                                50

                                100

                                150

                                a

                                b

                                c

                                C

                                -actin

                                p-4E-BP1

                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                p-4

                                E-B

                                P1

                                p

                                erc

                                en

                                t o

                                f co

                                ntr

                                ol

                                Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                301 5248 10626

                                0

                                50

                                100

                                150

                                200

                                250

                                c

                                b

                                a

                                A

                                -actin

                                Nrf2

                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                Nrf

                                2

                                pe

                                rce

                                nt

                                of

                                co

                                ntr

                                ol

                                301 5248 10626

                                0

                                50

                                100

                                150

                                200

                                250

                                c

                                b

                                a

                                B

                                -actin

                                HO-1

                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                HO

                                -1 p

                                erc

                                en

                                t o

                                f co

                                ntr

                                ol

                                Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                Updated version

                                1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                Access the most recent version of this article at

                                Material

                                Supplementary

                                89DC1

                                httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                Manuscript

                                Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                Subscriptions

                                Reprints and

                                pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                Permissions

                                Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                • Article File
                                • Figure 1
                                • Figure 2
                                • Figures 3-6

                                  REFERENCES

                                  1 Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 667-30

                                  2 Schildkraut JM Iversen ES Akushevich L Whitaker R Bentley RC Berchuck A Marks JR

                                  Molecular signatures of epithelial ovarian cancer analysis of associations with tumor

                                  characteristics and epidemiologic risk factors Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013

                                  221709-1721

                                  3 Tothill RW Tinker AV George J Brown R Fox SB Lade S Johnson DS Trivett MK

                                  Etemadmoghadam D Locandro B Traficante N Fereday S Hung JA Chiew YE Haviv I

                                  Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group Gertig D DeFazio A Bowtell DD Novel molecular

                                  subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome Clin Cancer Res

                                  2008 145198-5208

                                  4 The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian

                                  carcinoma Nature 2011 474609-615

                                  5 Rooth C Ovarian cancer risk factors treatment and management Br J Nurs 2013 22S23-30

                                  6 Bast RC Jr Urban N Shridhar V Smith D Zhang Z Skates S Lu K Liu J Fishman D Mills

                                  G Early detection of ovarian cancer promise and reality Cancer Treat Res 2002 10761-97

                                  7 Bookman MA Standard treatment in advanced ovarian cancer in 2005 the state of the art Int

                                  J Gynecol Cancer 2005 15 Suppl 3212-220

                                  8 Kelland L The resurgence of platinum-based cancer chemotherapy Nat Rev Cancer 2007

                                  7573-584

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

                                  reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

                                  10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

                                  gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

                                  1161697-1705

                                  11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

                                  Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

                                  Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

                                  12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

                                  H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

                                  Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

                                  cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

                                  13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

                                  Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

                                  apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

                                  14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

                                  Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

                                  pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

                                  to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

                                  15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

                                  16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

                                  Ljunggren

                                  J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

                                  beta

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

                                  17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

                                  estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

                                  18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

                                  Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

                                  growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

                                  261193-204

                                  19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

                                  human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

                                  20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

                                  arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

                                  pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

                                  21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

                                  induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

                                  2007 10523-30

                                  22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

                                  ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

                                  23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

                                  Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

                                  24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

                                  Cancer 2003 13405-12

                                  25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                                  Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                                  preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                                  27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                                  chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                                  28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                                  spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                                  29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                                  Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                                  adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                                  2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                                  30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                                  Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                                  preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                                  81373-379

                                  31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                                  egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                                  32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                                  dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                                  33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                                  cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                                  34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                                  of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                                  isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                                  2010621001-1005

                                  36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                                  Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                                  37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                                  human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                                  38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                                  antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                                  2016951088-95

                                  39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                                  mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                                  cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                                  40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                                  fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                                  41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                                  autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                                  Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                                  42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                                  1945

                                  43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                                  Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                                  induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                                  Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                                  culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                                  45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                                  46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                                  KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                                  future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                                  47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                                  of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                                  48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                                  CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                                  112171-178

                                  49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                                  proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                                  50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                                  ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                                  51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                                  hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                                  52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                                  pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                                  53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                                  54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                                  kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                                  cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                                  18334-342

                                  56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                                  SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                                  convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                                  57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                                  Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                                  NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                                  58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                                  cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                                  59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                                  Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                                  Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                                  cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                                  60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                                  149274-293

                                  61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                                  electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                                  62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                                  in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                                  63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                                  6636-44

                                  64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                                  Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                                  analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                                  65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                                  epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                                  2012 271918-1924

                                  66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                                  AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                                  cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                                  67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                                  Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                                  68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                                  with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                                  69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                                  tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                                  Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                                  Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                                  Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                                  common classification

                                  Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                                  pattern present but not distinct

                                  Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                                  common classification

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                                  Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                                  X2 301 5248 10626

                                  Tumor ()

                                  Incidence

                                  Reduction

                                  30100

                                  30

                                  -

                                  19100

                                  19

                                  -367

                                  10100

                                  10

                                  -667

                                  0002

                                  X2=12701

                                  Serous carcinoma ()

                                  Incidence

                                  Reduction

                                  19100

                                  19

                                  -

                                  11100

                                  11

                                  -421

                                  6100

                                  6

                                  -684

                                  0017

                                  X2=8144

                                  Mucinous carcinoma ()

                                  Incidence

                                  Reduction

                                  11100

                                  11

                                  -

                                  8100

                                  8

                                  -273

                                  4100

                                  4

                                  -636

                                  0175

                                  X2=3485

                                  Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                                  Grade 1 530

                                  167

                                  719

                                  368

                                  510

                                  500

                                  0084

                                  X2=4943

                                  Grade 2 1830

                                  600

                                  819

                                  421

                                  310

                                  300

                                  0196

                                  X2=3258

                                  Grade 3 730

                                  233

                                  419

                                  211

                                  210

                                  200

                                  0968

                                  X2=0064

                                  Number of tumors1 37100

                                  19100 10100 00001

                                  Sizehen mm1

                                  281plusmn050a

                                  109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                                  b 00001

                                  Sizehen with tumors only

                                  mm1

                                  686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                                  Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                                  Survival () 83100

                                  83

                                  88100

                                  88

                                  91100

                                  91

                                  0228

                                  X2=2953

                                  1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                                  superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  FIGURE LEGENDS

                                  Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                                  ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                                  Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                                  Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                                  original magnification x40

                                  Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                                  daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                                  a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                  Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                                  expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                                  blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                  same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                  Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                                  C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                                  representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                                  percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                                  significantly ( P lt 005)

                                  Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                                  tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                  same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  301 5248 10626

                                  0

                                  100

                                  200

                                  300

                                  400

                                  500

                                  c

                                  b

                                  a

                                  A

                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                  Gen

                                  iste

                                  in n

                                  mo

                                  ll

                                  301 5248 10626

                                  0

                                  20

                                  40

                                  60

                                  80

                                  B

                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                  Dai

                                  dze

                                  in n

                                  mo

                                  ll

                                  301 5248 10626

                                  0

                                  1

                                  2

                                  3

                                  4a

                                  b

                                  c

                                  C

                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                  Ova

                                  ry M

                                  DA

                                  n

                                  mo

                                  lm

                                  g p

                                  rote

                                  in

                                  Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  301 5248 10626

                                  0

                                  50

                                  100

                                  150

                                  a

                                  b

                                  c

                                  A

                                  -actin

                                  p-mTOR

                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                  p-m

                                  TO

                                  R

                                  pe

                                  rce

                                  nt

                                  of

                                  co

                                  ntr

                                  ol

                                  301 5248 10626

                                  0

                                  50

                                  100

                                  150

                                  a

                                  b

                                  c

                                  B

                                  -actin

                                  p-p70S6K1

                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                  p-p

                                  70

                                  S6

                                  K1

                                  p

                                  erc

                                  en

                                  t o

                                  f co

                                  ntr

                                  ol

                                  301 5248 10626

                                  0

                                  50

                                  100

                                  150

                                  a

                                  b

                                  c

                                  C

                                  -actin

                                  p-4E-BP1

                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                  p-4

                                  E-B

                                  P1

                                  p

                                  erc

                                  en

                                  t o

                                  f co

                                  ntr

                                  ol

                                  Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  301 5248 10626

                                  0

                                  50

                                  100

                                  150

                                  200

                                  250

                                  c

                                  b

                                  a

                                  A

                                  -actin

                                  Nrf2

                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                  Nrf

                                  2

                                  pe

                                  rce

                                  nt

                                  of

                                  co

                                  ntr

                                  ol

                                  301 5248 10626

                                  0

                                  50

                                  100

                                  150

                                  200

                                  250

                                  c

                                  b

                                  a

                                  B

                                  -actin

                                  HO-1

                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                  HO

                                  -1 p

                                  erc

                                  en

                                  t o

                                  f co

                                  ntr

                                  ol

                                  Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                  Updated version

                                  1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                  Access the most recent version of this article at

                                  Material

                                  Supplementary

                                  89DC1

                                  httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                  Manuscript

                                  Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                  E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                  Subscriptions

                                  Reprints and

                                  pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                  To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                  Permissions

                                  Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                  89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                  • Article File
                                  • Figure 1
                                  • Figure 2
                                  • Figures 3-6

                                    9 Zhang M Xie X Lee AH Binns CW Soy and isoflavone intake are associated with

                                    reduced risk of ovarian cancer in southeast china Nutrition and Cancer 2004 49125-130

                                    10 Myung SK Ju W Choi HJ Kim SC Soy intake and risk of endocrine-related

                                    gynaecological cancer a meta-analysis British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2009

                                    1161697-1705

                                    11 Rossi M Negri E Lagiou P Talamini R Dal Maso L Montella M Franceschi S La

                                    Vecchia C Flavonoids and ovarian cancer risk A case-control study in Italy International

                                    Journal of Cancer 2008 123895-898

                                    12 Chang ET Lee VS Canchola AJ Clarke CA Purdie DM Reynolds P Anton-Culver

                                    H Bernstein L Deapen D Peel D Pinder R Ross RK Stram DO West DW Wright W

                                    Ziogas A Horn-Ross PL Diet and risk of ovarian cancer in the California Teachers Study

                                    cohort American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165802-813

                                    13 Bandera EV King M Chandran U Paddock LE Rodriguez-Rodriguez L Olson SH

                                    Phytoestrogen consumption from foods and supplements and epithelial ovarian cancer risk

                                    apopulation-based case control study BMC Womens Health 2011 1140

                                    14 Takimoto CH Glover K Huang X Hayes SA Gallot L Quinn M Jovanovic BD Shapiro A

                                    Hernandez L Goetz A Llorens V Lieberman R Crowell JA Poisson BA Bergan RC Phase I

                                    pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of unconjugated soy isoflavones administered

                                    to individuals with cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003 12 1213-1221

                                    15 Yildiz F Phytoestrogens in functional foods CRC Press Boca Raton FL 2005

                                    16 Pike AC Brzozowski AM Hubbard RE Bonn T Thorsell AG Engstrom O

                                    Ljunggren

                                    J Gustafsson JA Carlquist M Structure of the ligand-binding domain of oestrogen receptor

                                    beta

                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

                                    17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

                                    estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

                                    18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

                                    Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

                                    growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

                                    261193-204

                                    19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

                                    human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

                                    20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

                                    arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

                                    pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

                                    21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

                                    induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

                                    2007 10523-30

                                    22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

                                    ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

                                    23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

                                    Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

                                    24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

                                    Cancer 2003 13405-12

                                    25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                                    Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                                    preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                                    27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                                    chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                                    28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                                    spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                                    29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                                    Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                                    adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                                    2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                                    30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                                    Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                                    preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                                    81373-379

                                    31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                                    egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                                    32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                                    dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                                    33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                                    cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                                    34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                                    of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                                    isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                                    2010621001-1005

                                    36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                                    Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                                    37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                                    human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                                    38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                                    antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                                    2016951088-95

                                    39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                                    mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                                    cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                                    40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                                    fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                                    41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                                    autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                                    Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                                    42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                                    1945

                                    43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                                    Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                                    induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                                    Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                                    culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                                    45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                                    46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                                    KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                                    future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                                    47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                                    of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                                    48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                                    CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                                    112171-178

                                    49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                                    proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                                    50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                                    ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                                    51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                                    hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                                    52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                                    pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                                    53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                                    54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                                    kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                                    cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                                    18334-342

                                    56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                                    SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                                    convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                                    57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                                    Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                                    NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                                    58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                                    cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                                    59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                                    Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                                    Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                                    cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                                    60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                                    149274-293

                                    61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                                    electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                                    62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                                    in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                                    63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                                    6636-44

                                    64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                                    Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                                    analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                                    65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                                    epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                                    2012 271918-1924

                                    66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                                    AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                                    cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                                    67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                                    Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                                    68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                                    with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                                    69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                                    tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                                    Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                                    Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                                    Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                                    common classification

                                    Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                                    pattern present but not distinct

                                    Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                                    common classification

                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                                    Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                                    X2 301 5248 10626

                                    Tumor ()

                                    Incidence

                                    Reduction

                                    30100

                                    30

                                    -

                                    19100

                                    19

                                    -367

                                    10100

                                    10

                                    -667

                                    0002

                                    X2=12701

                                    Serous carcinoma ()

                                    Incidence

                                    Reduction

                                    19100

                                    19

                                    -

                                    11100

                                    11

                                    -421

                                    6100

                                    6

                                    -684

                                    0017

                                    X2=8144

                                    Mucinous carcinoma ()

                                    Incidence

                                    Reduction

                                    11100

                                    11

                                    -

                                    8100

                                    8

                                    -273

                                    4100

                                    4

                                    -636

                                    0175

                                    X2=3485

                                    Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                                    Grade 1 530

                                    167

                                    719

                                    368

                                    510

                                    500

                                    0084

                                    X2=4943

                                    Grade 2 1830

                                    600

                                    819

                                    421

                                    310

                                    300

                                    0196

                                    X2=3258

                                    Grade 3 730

                                    233

                                    419

                                    211

                                    210

                                    200

                                    0968

                                    X2=0064

                                    Number of tumors1 37100

                                    19100 10100 00001

                                    Sizehen mm1

                                    281plusmn050a

                                    109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                                    b 00001

                                    Sizehen with tumors only

                                    mm1

                                    686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                                    Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                                    Survival () 83100

                                    83

                                    88100

                                    88

                                    91100

                                    91

                                    0228

                                    X2=2953

                                    1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                                    superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    FIGURE LEGENDS

                                    Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                                    ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                                    Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                                    Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                                    original magnification x40

                                    Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                                    daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                                    a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                    Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                                    expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                                    blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                    same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                    Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                                    C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                                    representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                                    percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                                    significantly ( P lt 005)

                                    Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                                    tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                    same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    301 5248 10626

                                    0

                                    100

                                    200

                                    300

                                    400

                                    500

                                    c

                                    b

                                    a

                                    A

                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                    Gen

                                    iste

                                    in n

                                    mo

                                    ll

                                    301 5248 10626

                                    0

                                    20

                                    40

                                    60

                                    80

                                    B

                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                    Dai

                                    dze

                                    in n

                                    mo

                                    ll

                                    301 5248 10626

                                    0

                                    1

                                    2

                                    3

                                    4a

                                    b

                                    c

                                    C

                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                    Ova

                                    ry M

                                    DA

                                    n

                                    mo

                                    lm

                                    g p

                                    rote

                                    in

                                    Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    301 5248 10626

                                    0

                                    50

                                    100

                                    150

                                    a

                                    b

                                    c

                                    A

                                    -actin

                                    p-mTOR

                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                    p-m

                                    TO

                                    R

                                    pe

                                    rce

                                    nt

                                    of

                                    co

                                    ntr

                                    ol

                                    301 5248 10626

                                    0

                                    50

                                    100

                                    150

                                    a

                                    b

                                    c

                                    B

                                    -actin

                                    p-p70S6K1

                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                    p-p

                                    70

                                    S6

                                    K1

                                    p

                                    erc

                                    en

                                    t o

                                    f co

                                    ntr

                                    ol

                                    301 5248 10626

                                    0

                                    50

                                    100

                                    150

                                    a

                                    b

                                    c

                                    C

                                    -actin

                                    p-4E-BP1

                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                    p-4

                                    E-B

                                    P1

                                    p

                                    erc

                                    en

                                    t o

                                    f co

                                    ntr

                                    ol

                                    Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    301 5248 10626

                                    0

                                    50

                                    100

                                    150

                                    200

                                    250

                                    c

                                    b

                                    a

                                    A

                                    -actin

                                    Nrf2

                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                    Nrf

                                    2

                                    pe

                                    rce

                                    nt

                                    of

                                    co

                                    ntr

                                    ol

                                    301 5248 10626

                                    0

                                    50

                                    100

                                    150

                                    200

                                    250

                                    c

                                    b

                                    a

                                    B

                                    -actin

                                    HO-1

                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                    HO

                                    -1 p

                                    erc

                                    en

                                    t o

                                    f co

                                    ntr

                                    ol

                                    Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                    Updated version

                                    1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                    Access the most recent version of this article at

                                    Material

                                    Supplementary

                                    89DC1

                                    httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                    Manuscript

                                    Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                    E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                    Subscriptions

                                    Reprints and

                                    pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                    To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                    Permissions

                                    Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                    89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                    • Article File
                                    • Figure 1
                                    • Figure 2
                                    • Figures 3-6

                                      in the presence of a partial agonist and a full antagonist EMBO Journal 1999 184608-4618

                                      17 Chen X Anderson JJ Isoflavones inhibit proliferation of ovarian cancer cells in vitro via an

                                      estrogen receptor-dependent pathway Nutr Cancer 2001 41165e71

                                      18 Novak-Hofer I Cohrs S Grunberg J Friedli A Schlatter MC Pfeifer M Altevogt P

                                      Schubiger PA Antibodies directed against L1-CAM synergize with Genistein in inhibiting

                                      growth and survival pathways in SKOV3ip human ovarian cancer cells Cancer Lett 2008

                                      261193-204

                                      19 Choi EJ Kim T Lee MS Pro-apoptotic effect and cytotoxicity of genistein and genistin in

                                      human ovarian cancer SK- OV-3 cells Life Science 2007 801403-1408

                                      20 Ouyang G Yao L Ruan K Song G Mao Y Bao S Genistein induces G2M cell cycle

                                      arrest and apoptosis of human ovarian cancer cells via activation of DNA damage checkpoint

                                      pathways Cell Biology International 2009 331237-1244

                                      21 Gossner G Choi M Tan L Fogoros S Griffith KA Kuenker M Liu JR Genistein

                                      induced apoptosis and autophagocytosis in ovarian cancer cells Gynecologic Oncology

                                      2007 10523-30

                                      22 Luo H Jiang BH King SM Chen YC Inhibition of cell growth and VEGF expression in

                                      ovarian cancer cells by flavonoids Nutrition and Cancer 2008 60800-809

                                      23 Rucinska A Kirko S Gabryelak T Effect of the phytoestrogen genistein-8-C-glucoside on

                                      Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro Cell Biology International 2007 311371-1378

                                      24 Stakleff KD Von Gruenigen VE Rodent models for ovarian cancer research Int J Gynecol

                                      Cancer 2003 13405-12

                                      25 Fredrickson TN Ovarian tumors of the hen Environ Health Perspect 1987 7335-51

                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                                      Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                                      preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                                      27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                                      chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                                      28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                                      spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                                      29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                                      Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                                      adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                                      2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                                      30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                                      Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                                      preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                                      81373-379

                                      31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                                      egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                                      32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                                      dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                                      33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                                      cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                                      34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                                      of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                                      isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                                      2010621001-1005

                                      36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                                      Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                                      37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                                      human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                                      38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                                      antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                                      2016951088-95

                                      39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                                      mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                                      cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                                      40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                                      fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                                      41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                                      autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                                      Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                                      42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                                      1945

                                      43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                                      Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                                      induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                                      Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                                      culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                                      45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                                      46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                                      KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                                      future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                                      47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                                      of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                                      48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                                      CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                                      112171-178

                                      49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                                      proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                                      50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                                      ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                                      51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                                      hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                                      52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                                      pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                                      53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                                      54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                                      kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                                      cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                                      18334-342

                                      56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                                      SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                                      convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                                      57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                                      Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                                      NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                                      58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                                      cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                                      59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                                      Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                                      Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                                      cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                                      60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                                      149274-293

                                      61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                                      electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                                      62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                                      in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                                      63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                                      6636-44

                                      64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                                      Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                                      analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                                      65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                                      epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                                      2012 271918-1924

                                      66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                                      AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                                      cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                                      67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                                      Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                                      68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                                      with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                                      69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                                      tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                                      Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                                      Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                                      Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                                      common classification

                                      Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                                      pattern present but not distinct

                                      Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                                      common classification

                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                                      Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                                      X2 301 5248 10626

                                      Tumor ()

                                      Incidence

                                      Reduction

                                      30100

                                      30

                                      -

                                      19100

                                      19

                                      -367

                                      10100

                                      10

                                      -667

                                      0002

                                      X2=12701

                                      Serous carcinoma ()

                                      Incidence

                                      Reduction

                                      19100

                                      19

                                      -

                                      11100

                                      11

                                      -421

                                      6100

                                      6

                                      -684

                                      0017

                                      X2=8144

                                      Mucinous carcinoma ()

                                      Incidence

                                      Reduction

                                      11100

                                      11

                                      -

                                      8100

                                      8

                                      -273

                                      4100

                                      4

                                      -636

                                      0175

                                      X2=3485

                                      Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                                      Grade 1 530

                                      167

                                      719

                                      368

                                      510

                                      500

                                      0084

                                      X2=4943

                                      Grade 2 1830

                                      600

                                      819

                                      421

                                      310

                                      300

                                      0196

                                      X2=3258

                                      Grade 3 730

                                      233

                                      419

                                      211

                                      210

                                      200

                                      0968

                                      X2=0064

                                      Number of tumors1 37100

                                      19100 10100 00001

                                      Sizehen mm1

                                      281plusmn050a

                                      109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                                      b 00001

                                      Sizehen with tumors only

                                      mm1

                                      686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                                      Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                                      Survival () 83100

                                      83

                                      88100

                                      88

                                      91100

                                      91

                                      0228

                                      X2=2953

                                      1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                                      superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      FIGURE LEGENDS

                                      Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                                      ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                                      Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                                      Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                                      original magnification x40

                                      Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                                      daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                                      a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                      Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                                      expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                                      blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                      same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                      Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                                      C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                                      representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                                      percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                                      significantly ( P lt 005)

                                      Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                                      tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                      same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      301 5248 10626

                                      0

                                      100

                                      200

                                      300

                                      400

                                      500

                                      c

                                      b

                                      a

                                      A

                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                      Gen

                                      iste

                                      in n

                                      mo

                                      ll

                                      301 5248 10626

                                      0

                                      20

                                      40

                                      60

                                      80

                                      B

                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                      Dai

                                      dze

                                      in n

                                      mo

                                      ll

                                      301 5248 10626

                                      0

                                      1

                                      2

                                      3

                                      4a

                                      b

                                      c

                                      C

                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                      Ova

                                      ry M

                                      DA

                                      n

                                      mo

                                      lm

                                      g p

                                      rote

                                      in

                                      Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      301 5248 10626

                                      0

                                      50

                                      100

                                      150

                                      a

                                      b

                                      c

                                      A

                                      -actin

                                      p-mTOR

                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                      p-m

                                      TO

                                      R

                                      pe

                                      rce

                                      nt

                                      of

                                      co

                                      ntr

                                      ol

                                      301 5248 10626

                                      0

                                      50

                                      100

                                      150

                                      a

                                      b

                                      c

                                      B

                                      -actin

                                      p-p70S6K1

                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                      p-p

                                      70

                                      S6

                                      K1

                                      p

                                      erc

                                      en

                                      t o

                                      f co

                                      ntr

                                      ol

                                      301 5248 10626

                                      0

                                      50

                                      100

                                      150

                                      a

                                      b

                                      c

                                      C

                                      -actin

                                      p-4E-BP1

                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                      p-4

                                      E-B

                                      P1

                                      p

                                      erc

                                      en

                                      t o

                                      f co

                                      ntr

                                      ol

                                      Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      301 5248 10626

                                      0

                                      50

                                      100

                                      150

                                      200

                                      250

                                      c

                                      b

                                      a

                                      A

                                      -actin

                                      Nrf2

                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                      Nrf

                                      2

                                      pe

                                      rce

                                      nt

                                      of

                                      co

                                      ntr

                                      ol

                                      301 5248 10626

                                      0

                                      50

                                      100

                                      150

                                      200

                                      250

                                      c

                                      b

                                      a

                                      B

                                      -actin

                                      HO-1

                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                      HO

                                      -1 p

                                      erc

                                      en

                                      t o

                                      f co

                                      ntr

                                      ol

                                      Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                      Updated version

                                      1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                      Access the most recent version of this article at

                                      Material

                                      Supplementary

                                      89DC1

                                      httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                      Manuscript

                                      Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                      E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                      Subscriptions

                                      Reprints and

                                      pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                      To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                      Permissions

                                      Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                      89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                      • Article File
                                      • Figure 1
                                      • Figure 2
                                      • Figures 3-6

                                        26 Barua A Bitterman P Abramowicz JS Dirks AL Bahr JM Hales DB Bradaric MJ

                                        Edassery SL Rotmensch J Luborsky JL Histopathology of ovarian tumors in laying hens a

                                        preclinical model of human ovarian cancer Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009 19531-539

                                        27 International Chicken Genome Sequencing C Sequence and comparative analysis of the

                                        chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004 432695-716

                                        28 Jackson E Anderson K Ashwell C Petitte J Mozdziak PE CA125 expression in

                                        spontaneous ovarian adenocarcinomas from laying hens Gynecol Oncol 2007 104192-198

                                        29 Hakim AA Barry CP Barnes HJ Anderson KE Petitte J Whitaker R Lancaster JM

                                        Wenham RM Carver DK Turbov J Berchuck A Kopelovich L Rodriguez GC Ovarian

                                        adenocarcinomas in the laying hen and women share similar alterations in p53 ras and HER-

                                        2neu Cancer Prev Res 2009 2114-121

                                        30 Rodriguez-Burford C Barnes MN Berry W Partridge EE Grizzle WE

                                        Immunohistochemical expression of molecular markers in an avian model a potential model for

                                        preclinical evaluation of agents for ovarian cancer chemoprevention Gynecol Oncol 2001

                                        81373-379

                                        31 Akdemir F Sahin K Genistein supplementation to the quail effects on egg production and

                                        egg yolk genistein daidzein and lipid peroxidation levels Poult Sci 2009 882125-2131

                                        32 Rasouli E Jahanian R Improved performance and immunological responses as the result of

                                        dietary genistein supplementation of broiler chicks Animal 201591473-1480

                                        33 Harris EA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Kopelovich L Mozdziak PE Epithelial

                                        cell tumors of the hen reproductive tract Avian Dis 20145895-101

                                        34Mocka EH Stern RA Fletcher OJ Anderson KE Petitte JN Mozdziak PE Chemoprevention

                                        of spontaneous ovarian cancer in the domestic hen Poult Sci 2017 961901-1909

                                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                                        isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                                        2010621001-1005

                                        36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                                        Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                                        37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                                        human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                                        38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                                        antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                                        2016951088-95

                                        39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                                        mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                                        cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                                        40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                                        fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                                        41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                                        autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                                        Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                                        42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                                        1945

                                        43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                                        Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                                        induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                                        Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                                        culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                                        45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                                        46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                                        KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                                        future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                                        47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                                        of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                                        48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                                        CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                                        112171-178

                                        49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                                        proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                                        50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                                        ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                                        51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                                        hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                                        52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                                        pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                                        53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                                        54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                                        kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                                        cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                                        18334-342

                                        56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                                        SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                                        convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                                        57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                                        Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                                        NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                                        58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                                        cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                                        59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                                        Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                                        Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                                        cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                                        60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                                        149274-293

                                        61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                                        electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                                        62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                                        in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                                        63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                                        6636-44

                                        64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                                        Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                                        analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                                        65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                                        epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                                        2012 271918-1924

                                        66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                                        AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                                        cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                                        67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                                        Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                                        68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                                        with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                                        69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                                        tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                                        Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                                        Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                                        Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                                        common classification

                                        Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                                        pattern present but not distinct

                                        Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                                        common classification

                                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                                        Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                                        X2 301 5248 10626

                                        Tumor ()

                                        Incidence

                                        Reduction

                                        30100

                                        30

                                        -

                                        19100

                                        19

                                        -367

                                        10100

                                        10

                                        -667

                                        0002

                                        X2=12701

                                        Serous carcinoma ()

                                        Incidence

                                        Reduction

                                        19100

                                        19

                                        -

                                        11100

                                        11

                                        -421

                                        6100

                                        6

                                        -684

                                        0017

                                        X2=8144

                                        Mucinous carcinoma ()

                                        Incidence

                                        Reduction

                                        11100

                                        11

                                        -

                                        8100

                                        8

                                        -273

                                        4100

                                        4

                                        -636

                                        0175

                                        X2=3485

                                        Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                                        Grade 1 530

                                        167

                                        719

                                        368

                                        510

                                        500

                                        0084

                                        X2=4943

                                        Grade 2 1830

                                        600

                                        819

                                        421

                                        310

                                        300

                                        0196

                                        X2=3258

                                        Grade 3 730

                                        233

                                        419

                                        211

                                        210

                                        200

                                        0968

                                        X2=0064

                                        Number of tumors1 37100

                                        19100 10100 00001

                                        Sizehen mm1

                                        281plusmn050a

                                        109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                                        b 00001

                                        Sizehen with tumors only

                                        mm1

                                        686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                                        Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                                        Survival () 83100

                                        83

                                        88100

                                        88

                                        91100

                                        91

                                        0228

                                        X2=2953

                                        1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                                        superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        FIGURE LEGENDS

                                        Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                                        ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                                        Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                                        Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                                        original magnification x40

                                        Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                                        daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                                        a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                        Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                                        expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                                        blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                        same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                        Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                                        C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                                        representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                                        percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                                        significantly ( P lt 005)

                                        Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                                        tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                        same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        301 5248 10626

                                        0

                                        100

                                        200

                                        300

                                        400

                                        500

                                        c

                                        b

                                        a

                                        A

                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                        Gen

                                        iste

                                        in n

                                        mo

                                        ll

                                        301 5248 10626

                                        0

                                        20

                                        40

                                        60

                                        80

                                        B

                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                        Dai

                                        dze

                                        in n

                                        mo

                                        ll

                                        301 5248 10626

                                        0

                                        1

                                        2

                                        3

                                        4a

                                        b

                                        c

                                        C

                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                        Ova

                                        ry M

                                        DA

                                        n

                                        mo

                                        lm

                                        g p

                                        rote

                                        in

                                        Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        301 5248 10626

                                        0

                                        50

                                        100

                                        150

                                        a

                                        b

                                        c

                                        A

                                        -actin

                                        p-mTOR

                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                        p-m

                                        TO

                                        R

                                        pe

                                        rce

                                        nt

                                        of

                                        co

                                        ntr

                                        ol

                                        301 5248 10626

                                        0

                                        50

                                        100

                                        150

                                        a

                                        b

                                        c

                                        B

                                        -actin

                                        p-p70S6K1

                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                        p-p

                                        70

                                        S6

                                        K1

                                        p

                                        erc

                                        en

                                        t o

                                        f co

                                        ntr

                                        ol

                                        301 5248 10626

                                        0

                                        50

                                        100

                                        150

                                        a

                                        b

                                        c

                                        C

                                        -actin

                                        p-4E-BP1

                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                        p-4

                                        E-B

                                        P1

                                        p

                                        erc

                                        en

                                        t o

                                        f co

                                        ntr

                                        ol

                                        Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        301 5248 10626

                                        0

                                        50

                                        100

                                        150

                                        200

                                        250

                                        c

                                        b

                                        a

                                        A

                                        -actin

                                        Nrf2

                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                        Nrf

                                        2

                                        pe

                                        rce

                                        nt

                                        of

                                        co

                                        ntr

                                        ol

                                        301 5248 10626

                                        0

                                        50

                                        100

                                        150

                                        200

                                        250

                                        c

                                        b

                                        a

                                        B

                                        -actin

                                        HO-1

                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                        HO

                                        -1 p

                                        erc

                                        en

                                        t o

                                        f co

                                        ntr

                                        ol

                                        Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                        Updated version

                                        1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                        Access the most recent version of this article at

                                        Material

                                        Supplementary

                                        89DC1

                                        httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                        Manuscript

                                        Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                        E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                        Subscriptions

                                        Reprints and

                                        pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                        To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                        Permissions

                                        Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                        89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                        • Article File
                                        • Figure 1
                                        • Figure 2
                                        • Figures 3-6

                                          35 Tacyildiz N Ozyoruk D Yavuz G Unal E Dincaslan H Dogu F Sahin K Kucuk O Soy

                                          isoflavones ameliorate the adverse effects of chemotherapy in children Nutr Cancer

                                          2010621001-1005

                                          36 AOC Association of Official Analytical Chemists Official Methods of Analysis 15th ed

                                          Arlington VA Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1990

                                          37 Karatepe M Simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid and free malondialdehyde in

                                          human serum by HPLCUV LC-GC North America 2004 22 362ndash365

                                          38 Sahin K Orhan C Tuzcu M Sahin N Hayirli A Bilgili S Kucuk O Lycopene activates

                                          antioxidant enzymes and nuclear transcription factor systems in heat-stressed broilers Poult Sci

                                          2016951088-95

                                          39 Chan DW Liu VW Tsao GS Yao KM Furukawa T Chan KK Ngan HY Loss of MKP3

                                          mediated by oxidative stress enhances tumorigenicity and chemoresistance of ovarian cancer

                                          cells Carcinogenesis 2008 291742-1750

                                          40 Gloire G Legrand-Poels S Piette J NF-kappaB activation by reactive oxygen species

                                          fifteen years later Biochem Pharmacol 2006 721493-1505

                                          41 Byun YJ Kim SK Kim YM Chae GT Jeong SW Lee SB Hydrogen peroxide induces

                                          autophagic cell death in C6 glioma cells via BNIP3-mediated suppression of the mTOR pathway

                                          Neurosci Lett 2009 461131-135

                                          42 Hay N and Sonenberg N Upstream and downstream of mTOR Genes Dev 2004 181926-

                                          1945

                                          43 Itoh K Chiba T Takahashi S Ishii T Igarashi K Katoh Y Oyake T Hayashi N Satoh K

                                          Hatayama I Yamamoto M Nabeshima Y An Nrf2small Maf heterodimer mediates the

                                          induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements Biochem

                                          Biophys Res Commun 1997 236313-322

                                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                                          culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                                          45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                                          46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                                          KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                                          future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                                          47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                                          of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                                          48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                                          CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                                          112171-178

                                          49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                                          proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                                          50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                                          ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                                          51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                                          hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                                          52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                                          pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                                          53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                                          54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                                          kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                                          cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                                          18334-342

                                          56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                                          SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                                          convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                                          57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                                          Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                                          NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                                          58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                                          cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                                          59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                                          Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                                          Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                                          cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                                          60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                                          149274-293

                                          61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                                          electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                                          62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                                          in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                                          63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                                          6636-44

                                          64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                                          Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                                          analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                                          65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                                          epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                                          2012 271918-1924

                                          66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                                          AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                                          cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                                          67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                                          Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                                          68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                                          with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                                          69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                                          tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                                          Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                                          Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                                          Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                                          common classification

                                          Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                                          pattern present but not distinct

                                          Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                                          common classification

                                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                                          Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                                          X2 301 5248 10626

                                          Tumor ()

                                          Incidence

                                          Reduction

                                          30100

                                          30

                                          -

                                          19100

                                          19

                                          -367

                                          10100

                                          10

                                          -667

                                          0002

                                          X2=12701

                                          Serous carcinoma ()

                                          Incidence

                                          Reduction

                                          19100

                                          19

                                          -

                                          11100

                                          11

                                          -421

                                          6100

                                          6

                                          -684

                                          0017

                                          X2=8144

                                          Mucinous carcinoma ()

                                          Incidence

                                          Reduction

                                          11100

                                          11

                                          -

                                          8100

                                          8

                                          -273

                                          4100

                                          4

                                          -636

                                          0175

                                          X2=3485

                                          Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                                          Grade 1 530

                                          167

                                          719

                                          368

                                          510

                                          500

                                          0084

                                          X2=4943

                                          Grade 2 1830

                                          600

                                          819

                                          421

                                          310

                                          300

                                          0196

                                          X2=3258

                                          Grade 3 730

                                          233

                                          419

                                          211

                                          210

                                          200

                                          0968

                                          X2=0064

                                          Number of tumors1 37100

                                          19100 10100 00001

                                          Sizehen mm1

                                          281plusmn050a

                                          109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                                          b 00001

                                          Sizehen with tumors only

                                          mm1

                                          686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                                          Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                                          Survival () 83100

                                          83

                                          88100

                                          88

                                          91100

                                          91

                                          0228

                                          X2=2953

                                          1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                                          superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          FIGURE LEGENDS

                                          Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                                          ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                                          Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                                          Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                                          original magnification x40

                                          Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                                          daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                                          a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                          Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                                          expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                                          blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                          same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                          Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                                          C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                                          representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                                          percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                                          significantly ( P lt 005)

                                          Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                                          tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                          same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          301 5248 10626

                                          0

                                          100

                                          200

                                          300

                                          400

                                          500

                                          c

                                          b

                                          a

                                          A

                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                          Gen

                                          iste

                                          in n

                                          mo

                                          ll

                                          301 5248 10626

                                          0

                                          20

                                          40

                                          60

                                          80

                                          B

                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                          Dai

                                          dze

                                          in n

                                          mo

                                          ll

                                          301 5248 10626

                                          0

                                          1

                                          2

                                          3

                                          4a

                                          b

                                          c

                                          C

                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                          Ova

                                          ry M

                                          DA

                                          n

                                          mo

                                          lm

                                          g p

                                          rote

                                          in

                                          Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          301 5248 10626

                                          0

                                          50

                                          100

                                          150

                                          a

                                          b

                                          c

                                          A

                                          -actin

                                          p-mTOR

                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                          p-m

                                          TO

                                          R

                                          pe

                                          rce

                                          nt

                                          of

                                          co

                                          ntr

                                          ol

                                          301 5248 10626

                                          0

                                          50

                                          100

                                          150

                                          a

                                          b

                                          c

                                          B

                                          -actin

                                          p-p70S6K1

                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                          p-p

                                          70

                                          S6

                                          K1

                                          p

                                          erc

                                          en

                                          t o

                                          f co

                                          ntr

                                          ol

                                          301 5248 10626

                                          0

                                          50

                                          100

                                          150

                                          a

                                          b

                                          c

                                          C

                                          -actin

                                          p-4E-BP1

                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                          p-4

                                          E-B

                                          P1

                                          p

                                          erc

                                          en

                                          t o

                                          f co

                                          ntr

                                          ol

                                          Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          301 5248 10626

                                          0

                                          50

                                          100

                                          150

                                          200

                                          250

                                          c

                                          b

                                          a

                                          A

                                          -actin

                                          Nrf2

                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                          Nrf

                                          2

                                          pe

                                          rce

                                          nt

                                          of

                                          co

                                          ntr

                                          ol

                                          301 5248 10626

                                          0

                                          50

                                          100

                                          150

                                          200

                                          250

                                          c

                                          b

                                          a

                                          B

                                          -actin

                                          HO-1

                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                          HO

                                          -1 p

                                          erc

                                          en

                                          t o

                                          f co

                                          ntr

                                          ol

                                          Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                          Updated version

                                          1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                          Access the most recent version of this article at

                                          Material

                                          Supplementary

                                          89DC1

                                          httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                          Manuscript

                                          Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                          E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                          Subscriptions

                                          Reprints and

                                          pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                          To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                          Permissions

                                          Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                          89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                          • Article File
                                          • Figure 1
                                          • Figure 2
                                          • Figures 3-6

                                            44 Ryter SW Choi AM Heme oxygenase-1 redox regulation of a stress protein in lung and cell

                                            culture models Antioxid Redox Signal 2005 780-91

                                            45 Cho KR Shih IeM Ovarian cancer Annu Rev Pathol 2009 4287-313

                                            46 Spagnuolo C Russo GL Orhan IE Habtemariam S Daglia M Sureda A Nabavi SF Devi

                                            KP Loizzo MR Tundis R Nabavi SM Genistein and cancer current status challenges and

                                            future directions Adv Nutr 2015 6408-419

                                            47 Murdoch WJ Van Kirk EA Alexander BM DNA damages in ovarian surface epithelial cells

                                            of ovulatory hens Exp Biol Med 2005 230429-433

                                            48 Zhuge Y Lagman JA Ansenberger K Mahon CJ Daikoku T Dey SK Bahr JM Hales DB

                                            CYP1B1 expression in ovarian cancer in the laying hen Gallus domesticus Gynecol Oncol 2009

                                            112171-178

                                            49 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell

                                            proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer Gynecol Oncol 2008 110418-424

                                            50 Trevintildeo LS1 Buckles EL Johnson PA Oral contraceptives decrease the prevalence of

                                            ovarian cancer in the hen Cancer Prev Res 2012 5343-349

                                            51 Urick ME Giles JR Johnson PA Dietary aspirin decreases the stage of ovarian cancer in the

                                            hen Gynecol Oncol 2009 112166-170

                                            52 Cramer DW Welch WR Determinants of ovarian cancer risk II Inferences regarding

                                            pathogenesis J Natl Cancer Inst 1983 71717-721

                                            53 Coussens LM Werb Z Inflammation and cancer Nature 2002 420860-867

                                            54 Hernandez L Hsu SC Davidson B Birrer MJ Kohn EC Annunziata CM Activation of NF-

                                            kappaB signaling by inhibitor of NF-kappaB kinase beta increases aggressiveness of ovarian

                                            cancer Cancer Res 2010 704005-4014

                                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                                            18334-342

                                            56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                                            SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                                            convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                                            57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                                            Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                                            NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                                            58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                                            cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                                            59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                                            Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                                            Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                                            cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                                            60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                                            149274-293

                                            61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                                            electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                                            62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                                            in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                                            63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                                            6636-44

                                            64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                                            Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                                            analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                                            65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                                            epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                                            2012 271918-1924

                                            66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                                            AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                                            cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                                            67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                                            Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                                            68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                                            with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                                            69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                                            tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                                            Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                                            Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                                            Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                                            common classification

                                            Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                                            pattern present but not distinct

                                            Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                                            common classification

                                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                                            Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                                            X2 301 5248 10626

                                            Tumor ()

                                            Incidence

                                            Reduction

                                            30100

                                            30

                                            -

                                            19100

                                            19

                                            -367

                                            10100

                                            10

                                            -667

                                            0002

                                            X2=12701

                                            Serous carcinoma ()

                                            Incidence

                                            Reduction

                                            19100

                                            19

                                            -

                                            11100

                                            11

                                            -421

                                            6100

                                            6

                                            -684

                                            0017

                                            X2=8144

                                            Mucinous carcinoma ()

                                            Incidence

                                            Reduction

                                            11100

                                            11

                                            -

                                            8100

                                            8

                                            -273

                                            4100

                                            4

                                            -636

                                            0175

                                            X2=3485

                                            Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                                            Grade 1 530

                                            167

                                            719

                                            368

                                            510

                                            500

                                            0084

                                            X2=4943

                                            Grade 2 1830

                                            600

                                            819

                                            421

                                            310

                                            300

                                            0196

                                            X2=3258

                                            Grade 3 730

                                            233

                                            419

                                            211

                                            210

                                            200

                                            0968

                                            X2=0064

                                            Number of tumors1 37100

                                            19100 10100 00001

                                            Sizehen mm1

                                            281plusmn050a

                                            109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                                            b 00001

                                            Sizehen with tumors only

                                            mm1

                                            686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                                            Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                                            Survival () 83100

                                            83

                                            88100

                                            88

                                            91100

                                            91

                                            0228

                                            X2=2953

                                            1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                                            superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            FIGURE LEGENDS

                                            Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                                            ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                                            Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                                            Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                                            original magnification x40

                                            Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                                            daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                                            a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                            Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                                            expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                                            blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                            same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                            Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                                            C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                                            representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                                            percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                                            significantly ( P lt 005)

                                            Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                                            tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                            same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            301 5248 10626

                                            0

                                            100

                                            200

                                            300

                                            400

                                            500

                                            c

                                            b

                                            a

                                            A

                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                            Gen

                                            iste

                                            in n

                                            mo

                                            ll

                                            301 5248 10626

                                            0

                                            20

                                            40

                                            60

                                            80

                                            B

                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                            Dai

                                            dze

                                            in n

                                            mo

                                            ll

                                            301 5248 10626

                                            0

                                            1

                                            2

                                            3

                                            4a

                                            b

                                            c

                                            C

                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                            Ova

                                            ry M

                                            DA

                                            n

                                            mo

                                            lm

                                            g p

                                            rote

                                            in

                                            Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            301 5248 10626

                                            0

                                            50

                                            100

                                            150

                                            a

                                            b

                                            c

                                            A

                                            -actin

                                            p-mTOR

                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                            p-m

                                            TO

                                            R

                                            pe

                                            rce

                                            nt

                                            of

                                            co

                                            ntr

                                            ol

                                            301 5248 10626

                                            0

                                            50

                                            100

                                            150

                                            a

                                            b

                                            c

                                            B

                                            -actin

                                            p-p70S6K1

                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                            p-p

                                            70

                                            S6

                                            K1

                                            p

                                            erc

                                            en

                                            t o

                                            f co

                                            ntr

                                            ol

                                            301 5248 10626

                                            0

                                            50

                                            100

                                            150

                                            a

                                            b

                                            c

                                            C

                                            -actin

                                            p-4E-BP1

                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                            p-4

                                            E-B

                                            P1

                                            p

                                            erc

                                            en

                                            t o

                                            f co

                                            ntr

                                            ol

                                            Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            301 5248 10626

                                            0

                                            50

                                            100

                                            150

                                            200

                                            250

                                            c

                                            b

                                            a

                                            A

                                            -actin

                                            Nrf2

                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                            Nrf

                                            2

                                            pe

                                            rce

                                            nt

                                            of

                                            co

                                            ntr

                                            ol

                                            301 5248 10626

                                            0

                                            50

                                            100

                                            150

                                            200

                                            250

                                            c

                                            b

                                            a

                                            B

                                            -actin

                                            HO-1

                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                            HO

                                            -1 p

                                            erc

                                            en

                                            t o

                                            f co

                                            ntr

                                            ol

                                            Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                            Updated version

                                            1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                            Access the most recent version of this article at

                                            Material

                                            Supplementary

                                            89DC1

                                            httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                            Manuscript

                                            Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                            E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                            Subscriptions

                                            Reprints and

                                            pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                            To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                            Permissions

                                            Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                            89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                            • Article File
                                            • Figure 1
                                            • Figure 2
                                            • Figures 3-6

                                              55 Karin M The IkappaB kinase - a bridge between inflammation and cancer Cell Res 2008

                                              18334-342

                                              56 Annunziata CM Stavnes HT Kleinberg L Berner A Hernandez LF Birrer MJ Steinberg

                                              SM Davidson B Kohn EC Nuclear factor kappaB transcription factors are coexpressed and

                                              convey a poor outcome in ovarian cancer Cancer 2010 1163276-3284

                                              57 Darb-Esfahani S Sinn BV Weichert W Budczies J Lehmann A Noske A Buckendahl AC

                                              Muller BM Sehouli J Koensgen D Gyorffy B Dietel M Denkert C Expression of classical

                                              NF-kappaB pathway effectors in human ovarian carcinoma Histopathology 2010 56727-739

                                              58 Guo LM Pu Y Han Z Liu T Li YX Liu M Li X Tang H MicroRNA-9 inhibits ovarian

                                              cancer cell growth through regulation of NF-kappaB1 FEBS J 2009 2765537-5546

                                              59 Huang J Zhang L Greshock J Colligon TA Wang Y Ward R Katsaros D Lassus H

                                              Butzow R Godwin AK Testa JR Nathanson KL Gimotty PA Coukos G Weber BL

                                              Degenhardt Y Frequent genetic abnormalities of the PI3KAKT pathway in primary ovarian

                                              cancer predict patient outcome Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011 50606-618

                                              60 Laplante M Sabatini DM mTOR signaling in growth control and disease Cell 2012

                                              149274-293

                                              61 Kansanen E Jyrkkanen HK Levonen AL Activation of stress signaling pathways by

                                              electrophilic oxidized and nitrated lipids Free Radic Biol Med 2012 52973-982

                                              62 Taguchi K Motohashi H Yamamoto M Molecular mechanisms of the Keap1ndashNrf2 pathway

                                              in stress response and cancer evolution Genes Cells 2011 16123-140

                                              63 Niture SK Khatri R Jaiswal AK Regulation of Nrf2-an update Free Radic Biol Med 2014

                                              6636-44

                                              64 Malhotra D Portales-Casamar E Singh A Srivastava S Arenillas D Happel C Shyr C

                                              Wakabayashi N Kensler TW Wasserman WW Biswal S Global mapping of binding sites for

                                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                                              analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                                              65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                                              epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                                              2012 271918-1924

                                              66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                                              AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                                              cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                                              67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                                              Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                                              68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                                              with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                                              69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                                              tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                                              Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                                              Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                                              Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                                              common classification

                                              Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                                              pattern present but not distinct

                                              Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                                              common classification

                                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                                              Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                                              X2 301 5248 10626

                                              Tumor ()

                                              Incidence

                                              Reduction

                                              30100

                                              30

                                              -

                                              19100

                                              19

                                              -367

                                              10100

                                              10

                                              -667

                                              0002

                                              X2=12701

                                              Serous carcinoma ()

                                              Incidence

                                              Reduction

                                              19100

                                              19

                                              -

                                              11100

                                              11

                                              -421

                                              6100

                                              6

                                              -684

                                              0017

                                              X2=8144

                                              Mucinous carcinoma ()

                                              Incidence

                                              Reduction

                                              11100

                                              11

                                              -

                                              8100

                                              8

                                              -273

                                              4100

                                              4

                                              -636

                                              0175

                                              X2=3485

                                              Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                                              Grade 1 530

                                              167

                                              719

                                              368

                                              510

                                              500

                                              0084

                                              X2=4943

                                              Grade 2 1830

                                              600

                                              819

                                              421

                                              310

                                              300

                                              0196

                                              X2=3258

                                              Grade 3 730

                                              233

                                              419

                                              211

                                              210

                                              200

                                              0968

                                              X2=0064

                                              Number of tumors1 37100

                                              19100 10100 00001

                                              Sizehen mm1

                                              281plusmn050a

                                              109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                                              b 00001

                                              Sizehen with tumors only

                                              mm1

                                              686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                                              Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                                              Survival () 83100

                                              83

                                              88100

                                              88

                                              91100

                                              91

                                              0228

                                              X2=2953

                                              1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                                              superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              FIGURE LEGENDS

                                              Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                                              ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                                              Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                                              Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                                              original magnification x40

                                              Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                                              daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                                              a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                              Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                                              expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                                              blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                              same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                              Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                                              C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                                              representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                                              percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                                              significantly ( P lt 005)

                                              Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                                              tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                              same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              301 5248 10626

                                              0

                                              100

                                              200

                                              300

                                              400

                                              500

                                              c

                                              b

                                              a

                                              A

                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                              Gen

                                              iste

                                              in n

                                              mo

                                              ll

                                              301 5248 10626

                                              0

                                              20

                                              40

                                              60

                                              80

                                              B

                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                              Dai

                                              dze

                                              in n

                                              mo

                                              ll

                                              301 5248 10626

                                              0

                                              1

                                              2

                                              3

                                              4a

                                              b

                                              c

                                              C

                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                              Ova

                                              ry M

                                              DA

                                              n

                                              mo

                                              lm

                                              g p

                                              rote

                                              in

                                              Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              301 5248 10626

                                              0

                                              50

                                              100

                                              150

                                              a

                                              b

                                              c

                                              A

                                              -actin

                                              p-mTOR

                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                              p-m

                                              TO

                                              R

                                              pe

                                              rce

                                              nt

                                              of

                                              co

                                              ntr

                                              ol

                                              301 5248 10626

                                              0

                                              50

                                              100

                                              150

                                              a

                                              b

                                              c

                                              B

                                              -actin

                                              p-p70S6K1

                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                              p-p

                                              70

                                              S6

                                              K1

                                              p

                                              erc

                                              en

                                              t o

                                              f co

                                              ntr

                                              ol

                                              301 5248 10626

                                              0

                                              50

                                              100

                                              150

                                              a

                                              b

                                              c

                                              C

                                              -actin

                                              p-4E-BP1

                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                              p-4

                                              E-B

                                              P1

                                              p

                                              erc

                                              en

                                              t o

                                              f co

                                              ntr

                                              ol

                                              Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              301 5248 10626

                                              0

                                              50

                                              100

                                              150

                                              200

                                              250

                                              c

                                              b

                                              a

                                              A

                                              -actin

                                              Nrf2

                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                              Nrf

                                              2

                                              pe

                                              rce

                                              nt

                                              of

                                              co

                                              ntr

                                              ol

                                              301 5248 10626

                                              0

                                              50

                                              100

                                              150

                                              200

                                              250

                                              c

                                              b

                                              a

                                              B

                                              -actin

                                              HO-1

                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                              HO

                                              -1 p

                                              erc

                                              en

                                              t o

                                              f co

                                              ntr

                                              ol

                                              Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                              Updated version

                                              1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                              Access the most recent version of this article at

                                              Material

                                              Supplementary

                                              89DC1

                                              httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                              Manuscript

                                              Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                              E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                              Subscriptions

                                              Reprints and

                                              pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                              To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                              Permissions

                                              Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                              89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                              • Article File
                                              • Figure 1
                                              • Figure 2
                                              • Figures 3-6

                                                Nrf2 identifies novel targets in cell survival response through ChIP-Seq profiling and network

                                                analysis Nucleic Acids Res 2010 385718-5734

                                                65 Liao H Zhou Q Zhang Z Wang Q Sun Y Yi X Feng Y NRF2 is overexpressed in ovarian

                                                epithelial carcinoma and is regulated by gonadotrophin and sex-steroid hormones Oncol Rep

                                                2012 271918-1924

                                                66 Konstantinopoulos PA Spentzos D Fountzilas E Francoeur N Sanisetty S Grammatikos

                                                AP Hecht JL Cannistra SA Keap1 mutations and Nrf2 pathway activation in epithelial ovarian

                                                cancer Cancer Res 2011 715081-5089

                                                67 Lau A Villeneuve NF Sun Z Wong PK Zhang DD Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer

                                                Pharmacol Res 2008 58262-270

                                                68 Kou X Kirberger M Yang Y Chen N Natural products for cancer prevention associated

                                                with Nrf2-ARE pathway Food Sci Hum Wellness 2013 222-28

                                                69 Ma X Zhang J Liu S Huang Y Chen B Wang D Nrf2 knockdown by shRNA inhibits

                                                tumor growth and increases efficacy of chemotherapy in cervical cancer Cancer Chemother

                                                Pharmacol 2012 69485-494

                                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                                                Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                                                Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                                                common classification

                                                Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                                                pattern present but not distinct

                                                Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                                                common classification

                                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                                                Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                                                X2 301 5248 10626

                                                Tumor ()

                                                Incidence

                                                Reduction

                                                30100

                                                30

                                                -

                                                19100

                                                19

                                                -367

                                                10100

                                                10

                                                -667

                                                0002

                                                X2=12701

                                                Serous carcinoma ()

                                                Incidence

                                                Reduction

                                                19100

                                                19

                                                -

                                                11100

                                                11

                                                -421

                                                6100

                                                6

                                                -684

                                                0017

                                                X2=8144

                                                Mucinous carcinoma ()

                                                Incidence

                                                Reduction

                                                11100

                                                11

                                                -

                                                8100

                                                8

                                                -273

                                                4100

                                                4

                                                -636

                                                0175

                                                X2=3485

                                                Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                                                Grade 1 530

                                                167

                                                719

                                                368

                                                510

                                                500

                                                0084

                                                X2=4943

                                                Grade 2 1830

                                                600

                                                819

                                                421

                                                310

                                                300

                                                0196

                                                X2=3258

                                                Grade 3 730

                                                233

                                                419

                                                211

                                                210

                                                200

                                                0968

                                                X2=0064

                                                Number of tumors1 37100

                                                19100 10100 00001

                                                Sizehen mm1

                                                281plusmn050a

                                                109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                                                b 00001

                                                Sizehen with tumors only

                                                mm1

                                                686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                                                Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                                                Survival () 83100

                                                83

                                                88100

                                                88

                                                91100

                                                91

                                                0228

                                                X2=2953

                                                1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                                                superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                FIGURE LEGENDS

                                                Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                                                ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                                                Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                                                Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                                                original magnification x40

                                                Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                                                daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                                                a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                                                expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                                                blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                                same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                                                C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                                                representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                                                percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                                                significantly ( P lt 005)

                                                Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                                                tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                                same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                301 5248 10626

                                                0

                                                100

                                                200

                                                300

                                                400

                                                500

                                                c

                                                b

                                                a

                                                A

                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                Gen

                                                iste

                                                in n

                                                mo

                                                ll

                                                301 5248 10626

                                                0

                                                20

                                                40

                                                60

                                                80

                                                B

                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                Dai

                                                dze

                                                in n

                                                mo

                                                ll

                                                301 5248 10626

                                                0

                                                1

                                                2

                                                3

                                                4a

                                                b

                                                c

                                                C

                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                Ova

                                                ry M

                                                DA

                                                n

                                                mo

                                                lm

                                                g p

                                                rote

                                                in

                                                Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                301 5248 10626

                                                0

                                                50

                                                100

                                                150

                                                a

                                                b

                                                c

                                                A

                                                -actin

                                                p-mTOR

                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                p-m

                                                TO

                                                R

                                                pe

                                                rce

                                                nt

                                                of

                                                co

                                                ntr

                                                ol

                                                301 5248 10626

                                                0

                                                50

                                                100

                                                150

                                                a

                                                b

                                                c

                                                B

                                                -actin

                                                p-p70S6K1

                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                p-p

                                                70

                                                S6

                                                K1

                                                p

                                                erc

                                                en

                                                t o

                                                f co

                                                ntr

                                                ol

                                                301 5248 10626

                                                0

                                                50

                                                100

                                                150

                                                a

                                                b

                                                c

                                                C

                                                -actin

                                                p-4E-BP1

                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                p-4

                                                E-B

                                                P1

                                                p

                                                erc

                                                en

                                                t o

                                                f co

                                                ntr

                                                ol

                                                Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                301 5248 10626

                                                0

                                                50

                                                100

                                                150

                                                200

                                                250

                                                c

                                                b

                                                a

                                                A

                                                -actin

                                                Nrf2

                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                Nrf

                                                2

                                                pe

                                                rce

                                                nt

                                                of

                                                co

                                                ntr

                                                ol

                                                301 5248 10626

                                                0

                                                50

                                                100

                                                150

                                                200

                                                250

                                                c

                                                b

                                                a

                                                B

                                                -actin

                                                HO-1

                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                HO

                                                -1 p

                                                erc

                                                en

                                                t o

                                                f co

                                                ntr

                                                ol

                                                Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                                Updated version

                                                1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                                Access the most recent version of this article at

                                                Material

                                                Supplementary

                                                89DC1

                                                httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                                Manuscript

                                                Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                                E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                                Subscriptions

                                                Reprints and

                                                pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                                To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                                Permissions

                                                Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                                89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                • Article File
                                                • Figure 1
                                                • Figure 2
                                                • Figures 3-6

                                                  Table 1 Histopathology classifications of the reproductive tumors of hens

                                                  Adenocarcinoma Characteristics

                                                  Grade 1 Well-differentiatedndashmitosis rare to absent defined pattern most

                                                  common classification

                                                  Grade 2 Intermediate differentiationndashmitosis rare to occasional tubular

                                                  pattern present but not distinct

                                                  Grade 3 Poorly differentiatedndashmitosis common cells highly anaplastic least

                                                  common classification

                                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                  Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                                                  Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                                                  X2 301 5248 10626

                                                  Tumor ()

                                                  Incidence

                                                  Reduction

                                                  30100

                                                  30

                                                  -

                                                  19100

                                                  19

                                                  -367

                                                  10100

                                                  10

                                                  -667

                                                  0002

                                                  X2=12701

                                                  Serous carcinoma ()

                                                  Incidence

                                                  Reduction

                                                  19100

                                                  19

                                                  -

                                                  11100

                                                  11

                                                  -421

                                                  6100

                                                  6

                                                  -684

                                                  0017

                                                  X2=8144

                                                  Mucinous carcinoma ()

                                                  Incidence

                                                  Reduction

                                                  11100

                                                  11

                                                  -

                                                  8100

                                                  8

                                                  -273

                                                  4100

                                                  4

                                                  -636

                                                  0175

                                                  X2=3485

                                                  Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                                                  Grade 1 530

                                                  167

                                                  719

                                                  368

                                                  510

                                                  500

                                                  0084

                                                  X2=4943

                                                  Grade 2 1830

                                                  600

                                                  819

                                                  421

                                                  310

                                                  300

                                                  0196

                                                  X2=3258

                                                  Grade 3 730

                                                  233

                                                  419

                                                  211

                                                  210

                                                  200

                                                  0968

                                                  X2=0064

                                                  Number of tumors1 37100

                                                  19100 10100 00001

                                                  Sizehen mm1

                                                  281plusmn050a

                                                  109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                                                  b 00001

                                                  Sizehen with tumors only

                                                  mm1

                                                  686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                                                  Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                                                  Survival () 83100

                                                  83

                                                  88100

                                                  88

                                                  91100

                                                  91

                                                  0228

                                                  X2=2953

                                                  1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                                                  superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                  FIGURE LEGENDS

                                                  Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                                                  ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                                                  Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                                                  Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                                                  original magnification x40

                                                  Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                                                  daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                                                  a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                  Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                                                  expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                                                  blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                                  same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                  Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                                                  C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                                                  representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                                                  percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                                                  significantly ( P lt 005)

                                                  Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                                                  tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                  for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                                  same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                  Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                  Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                  0

                                                  100

                                                  200

                                                  300

                                                  400

                                                  500

                                                  c

                                                  b

                                                  a

                                                  A

                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                  Gen

                                                  iste

                                                  in n

                                                  mo

                                                  ll

                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                  0

                                                  20

                                                  40

                                                  60

                                                  80

                                                  B

                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                  Dai

                                                  dze

                                                  in n

                                                  mo

                                                  ll

                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                  0

                                                  1

                                                  2

                                                  3

                                                  4a

                                                  b

                                                  c

                                                  C

                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                  Ova

                                                  ry M

                                                  DA

                                                  n

                                                  mo

                                                  lm

                                                  g p

                                                  rote

                                                  in

                                                  Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                  Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                  0

                                                  50

                                                  100

                                                  150

                                                  a

                                                  b

                                                  c

                                                  A

                                                  -actin

                                                  p-mTOR

                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                  p-m

                                                  TO

                                                  R

                                                  pe

                                                  rce

                                                  nt

                                                  of

                                                  co

                                                  ntr

                                                  ol

                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                  0

                                                  50

                                                  100

                                                  150

                                                  a

                                                  b

                                                  c

                                                  B

                                                  -actin

                                                  p-p70S6K1

                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                  p-p

                                                  70

                                                  S6

                                                  K1

                                                  p

                                                  erc

                                                  en

                                                  t o

                                                  f co

                                                  ntr

                                                  ol

                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                  0

                                                  50

                                                  100

                                                  150

                                                  a

                                                  b

                                                  c

                                                  C

                                                  -actin

                                                  p-4E-BP1

                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                  p-4

                                                  E-B

                                                  P1

                                                  p

                                                  erc

                                                  en

                                                  t o

                                                  f co

                                                  ntr

                                                  ol

                                                  Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                  0

                                                  50

                                                  100

                                                  150

                                                  200

                                                  250

                                                  c

                                                  b

                                                  a

                                                  A

                                                  -actin

                                                  Nrf2

                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                  Nrf

                                                  2

                                                  pe

                                                  rce

                                                  nt

                                                  of

                                                  co

                                                  ntr

                                                  ol

                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                  0

                                                  50

                                                  100

                                                  150

                                                  200

                                                  250

                                                  c

                                                  b

                                                  a

                                                  B

                                                  -actin

                                                  HO-1

                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                  HO

                                                  -1 p

                                                  erc

                                                  en

                                                  t o

                                                  f co

                                                  ntr

                                                  ol

                                                  Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                  Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                                  Updated version

                                                  1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                                  Access the most recent version of this article at

                                                  Material

                                                  Supplementary

                                                  89DC1

                                                  httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                                  Manuscript

                                                  Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                                  E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                                  Subscriptions

                                                  Reprints and

                                                  pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                                  To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                                  Permissions

                                                  Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                                  89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                  • Article File
                                                  • Figure 1
                                                  • Figure 2
                                                  • Figures 3-6

                                                    Table 2 Effect of genistein rich diet on the development of spontaneous ovarian cancer in hens

                                                    Item Dietary Genistein levels mghen per day --P--

                                                    X2 301 5248 10626

                                                    Tumor ()

                                                    Incidence

                                                    Reduction

                                                    30100

                                                    30

                                                    -

                                                    19100

                                                    19

                                                    -367

                                                    10100

                                                    10

                                                    -667

                                                    0002

                                                    X2=12701

                                                    Serous carcinoma ()

                                                    Incidence

                                                    Reduction

                                                    19100

                                                    19

                                                    -

                                                    11100

                                                    11

                                                    -421

                                                    6100

                                                    6

                                                    -684

                                                    0017

                                                    X2=8144

                                                    Mucinous carcinoma ()

                                                    Incidence

                                                    Reduction

                                                    11100

                                                    11

                                                    -

                                                    8100

                                                    8

                                                    -273

                                                    4100

                                                    4

                                                    -636

                                                    0175

                                                    X2=3485

                                                    Adenocarcinoma incidence ()

                                                    Grade 1 530

                                                    167

                                                    719

                                                    368

                                                    510

                                                    500

                                                    0084

                                                    X2=4943

                                                    Grade 2 1830

                                                    600

                                                    819

                                                    421

                                                    310

                                                    300

                                                    0196

                                                    X2=3258

                                                    Grade 3 730

                                                    233

                                                    419

                                                    211

                                                    210

                                                    200

                                                    0968

                                                    X2=0064

                                                    Number of tumors1 37100

                                                    19100 10100 00001

                                                    Sizehen mm1

                                                    281plusmn050a

                                                    109plusmn027b 047plusmn016

                                                    b 00001

                                                    Sizehen with tumors only

                                                    mm1

                                                    686plusmn085 526plusmn081 470plusmn067 0249

                                                    Size range of tumors mm 1ndash22 1ndash12 2ndash8 -

                                                    Survival () 83100

                                                    83

                                                    88100

                                                    88

                                                    91100

                                                    91

                                                    0228

                                                    X2=2953

                                                    1Data are presented as the means and standard errors a-b Means in the same line without a common

                                                    superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                    FIGURE LEGENDS

                                                    Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                                                    ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                                                    Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                                                    Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                                                    original magnification x40

                                                    Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                                                    daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                                                    a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                    Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                                                    expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                                                    blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                                    same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                    Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                                                    C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                                                    representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                                                    percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                                                    significantly ( P lt 005)

                                                    Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                                                    tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                    for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                                    same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                    Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                    Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                    301 5248 10626

                                                    0

                                                    100

                                                    200

                                                    300

                                                    400

                                                    500

                                                    c

                                                    b

                                                    a

                                                    A

                                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                    Gen

                                                    iste

                                                    in n

                                                    mo

                                                    ll

                                                    301 5248 10626

                                                    0

                                                    20

                                                    40

                                                    60

                                                    80

                                                    B

                                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                    Dai

                                                    dze

                                                    in n

                                                    mo

                                                    ll

                                                    301 5248 10626

                                                    0

                                                    1

                                                    2

                                                    3

                                                    4a

                                                    b

                                                    c

                                                    C

                                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                    Ova

                                                    ry M

                                                    DA

                                                    n

                                                    mo

                                                    lm

                                                    g p

                                                    rote

                                                    in

                                                    Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                    Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                    301 5248 10626

                                                    0

                                                    50

                                                    100

                                                    150

                                                    a

                                                    b

                                                    c

                                                    A

                                                    -actin

                                                    p-mTOR

                                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                    p-m

                                                    TO

                                                    R

                                                    pe

                                                    rce

                                                    nt

                                                    of

                                                    co

                                                    ntr

                                                    ol

                                                    301 5248 10626

                                                    0

                                                    50

                                                    100

                                                    150

                                                    a

                                                    b

                                                    c

                                                    B

                                                    -actin

                                                    p-p70S6K1

                                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                    p-p

                                                    70

                                                    S6

                                                    K1

                                                    p

                                                    erc

                                                    en

                                                    t o

                                                    f co

                                                    ntr

                                                    ol

                                                    301 5248 10626

                                                    0

                                                    50

                                                    100

                                                    150

                                                    a

                                                    b

                                                    c

                                                    C

                                                    -actin

                                                    p-4E-BP1

                                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                    p-4

                                                    E-B

                                                    P1

                                                    p

                                                    erc

                                                    en

                                                    t o

                                                    f co

                                                    ntr

                                                    ol

                                                    Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                    301 5248 10626

                                                    0

                                                    50

                                                    100

                                                    150

                                                    200

                                                    250

                                                    c

                                                    b

                                                    a

                                                    A

                                                    -actin

                                                    Nrf2

                                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                    Nrf

                                                    2

                                                    pe

                                                    rce

                                                    nt

                                                    of

                                                    co

                                                    ntr

                                                    ol

                                                    301 5248 10626

                                                    0

                                                    50

                                                    100

                                                    150

                                                    200

                                                    250

                                                    c

                                                    b

                                                    a

                                                    B

                                                    -actin

                                                    HO-1

                                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                    HO

                                                    -1 p

                                                    erc

                                                    en

                                                    t o

                                                    f co

                                                    ntr

                                                    ol

                                                    Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                    Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                                    Updated version

                                                    1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                                    Access the most recent version of this article at

                                                    Material

                                                    Supplementary

                                                    89DC1

                                                    httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                                    Manuscript

                                                    Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                                    E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                                    Subscriptions

                                                    Reprints and

                                                    pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                                    To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                                    Permissions

                                                    Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                                    89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                    • Article File
                                                    • Figure 1
                                                    • Figure 2
                                                    • Figures 3-6

                                                      FIGURE LEGENDS

                                                      Figure 1 Gross pathology of ovaries in laying hens with tumor (A-D) Tumors restricted to the

                                                      ovary Primary malignant ovarian tumors in hens Multiple solid tumor masses are observed

                                                      Figure 2 Histopathology of normal ovary (A) and ovarian carcinoma (B-C) in laying hens

                                                      Arrows indicate serous (B) and mucinous (C) ovarian tumors Hematoxylin and eosin staining

                                                      original magnification x40

                                                      Figure 3 The effects of genistein supplementation on serum concentration of genistein (A) and

                                                      daidzein (B) and ovarian tissues of MDA (C) in laying hens a-c Means in the same line without

                                                      a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                      Figure 4 Effects of genistein on NF-B (Panel A) Bcl-2 (Panel B) and Bax (Panel C)

                                                      expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a representative

                                                      blot for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                                      same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                      Figure 5 Effects of genistein on p-mTOR (Panel A) p-p70S6K1 (Panel B) and p-4E-BP1 (Panel

                                                      C) expressions in hen ovarian tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) and a

                                                      representative blot for each is shown (Supplementary Fig 2) Values are means plusmn SD Data are

                                                      percent of the control a-c Means in the same line without a common superscript differ

                                                      significantly ( P lt 005)

                                                      Figure 6 Effects of genistein on Nrf2 (Panel A) and HO-1(Panel B) expressions in hen ovarian

                                                      tissue Blots were repeated at least 3 times (n=3) (Supplementary Fig 2) and a representative blot

                                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                      for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                                      same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                      Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                      Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                      301 5248 10626

                                                      0

                                                      100

                                                      200

                                                      300

                                                      400

                                                      500

                                                      c

                                                      b

                                                      a

                                                      A

                                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                      Gen

                                                      iste

                                                      in n

                                                      mo

                                                      ll

                                                      301 5248 10626

                                                      0

                                                      20

                                                      40

                                                      60

                                                      80

                                                      B

                                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                      Dai

                                                      dze

                                                      in n

                                                      mo

                                                      ll

                                                      301 5248 10626

                                                      0

                                                      1

                                                      2

                                                      3

                                                      4a

                                                      b

                                                      c

                                                      C

                                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                      Ova

                                                      ry M

                                                      DA

                                                      n

                                                      mo

                                                      lm

                                                      g p

                                                      rote

                                                      in

                                                      Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                      Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                      301 5248 10626

                                                      0

                                                      50

                                                      100

                                                      150

                                                      a

                                                      b

                                                      c

                                                      A

                                                      -actin

                                                      p-mTOR

                                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                      p-m

                                                      TO

                                                      R

                                                      pe

                                                      rce

                                                      nt

                                                      of

                                                      co

                                                      ntr

                                                      ol

                                                      301 5248 10626

                                                      0

                                                      50

                                                      100

                                                      150

                                                      a

                                                      b

                                                      c

                                                      B

                                                      -actin

                                                      p-p70S6K1

                                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                      p-p

                                                      70

                                                      S6

                                                      K1

                                                      p

                                                      erc

                                                      en

                                                      t o

                                                      f co

                                                      ntr

                                                      ol

                                                      301 5248 10626

                                                      0

                                                      50

                                                      100

                                                      150

                                                      a

                                                      b

                                                      c

                                                      C

                                                      -actin

                                                      p-4E-BP1

                                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                      p-4

                                                      E-B

                                                      P1

                                                      p

                                                      erc

                                                      en

                                                      t o

                                                      f co

                                                      ntr

                                                      ol

                                                      Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                      301 5248 10626

                                                      0

                                                      50

                                                      100

                                                      150

                                                      200

                                                      250

                                                      c

                                                      b

                                                      a

                                                      A

                                                      -actin

                                                      Nrf2

                                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                      Nrf

                                                      2

                                                      pe

                                                      rce

                                                      nt

                                                      of

                                                      co

                                                      ntr

                                                      ol

                                                      301 5248 10626

                                                      0

                                                      50

                                                      100

                                                      150

                                                      200

                                                      250

                                                      c

                                                      b

                                                      a

                                                      B

                                                      -actin

                                                      HO-1

                                                      Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                      HO

                                                      -1 p

                                                      erc

                                                      en

                                                      t o

                                                      f co

                                                      ntr

                                                      ol

                                                      Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                                      on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                      Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                                      Updated version

                                                      1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                                      Access the most recent version of this article at

                                                      Material

                                                      Supplementary

                                                      89DC1

                                                      httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                                      Manuscript

                                                      Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                                      E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                                      Subscriptions

                                                      Reprints and

                                                      pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                                      To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                                      Permissions

                                                      Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                                      89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                      • Article File
                                                      • Figure 1
                                                      • Figure 2
                                                      • Figures 3-6

                                                        for each is shown Values are means plusmn SD Data are percent of the control a-c Means in the

                                                        same line without a common superscript differ significantly (P lt 005)

                                                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                        Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                        Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                        301 5248 10626

                                                        0

                                                        100

                                                        200

                                                        300

                                                        400

                                                        500

                                                        c

                                                        b

                                                        a

                                                        A

                                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                        Gen

                                                        iste

                                                        in n

                                                        mo

                                                        ll

                                                        301 5248 10626

                                                        0

                                                        20

                                                        40

                                                        60

                                                        80

                                                        B

                                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                        Dai

                                                        dze

                                                        in n

                                                        mo

                                                        ll

                                                        301 5248 10626

                                                        0

                                                        1

                                                        2

                                                        3

                                                        4a

                                                        b

                                                        c

                                                        C

                                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                        Ova

                                                        ry M

                                                        DA

                                                        n

                                                        mo

                                                        lm

                                                        g p

                                                        rote

                                                        in

                                                        Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                        Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                        301 5248 10626

                                                        0

                                                        50

                                                        100

                                                        150

                                                        a

                                                        b

                                                        c

                                                        A

                                                        -actin

                                                        p-mTOR

                                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                        p-m

                                                        TO

                                                        R

                                                        pe

                                                        rce

                                                        nt

                                                        of

                                                        co

                                                        ntr

                                                        ol

                                                        301 5248 10626

                                                        0

                                                        50

                                                        100

                                                        150

                                                        a

                                                        b

                                                        c

                                                        B

                                                        -actin

                                                        p-p70S6K1

                                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                        p-p

                                                        70

                                                        S6

                                                        K1

                                                        p

                                                        erc

                                                        en

                                                        t o

                                                        f co

                                                        ntr

                                                        ol

                                                        301 5248 10626

                                                        0

                                                        50

                                                        100

                                                        150

                                                        a

                                                        b

                                                        c

                                                        C

                                                        -actin

                                                        p-4E-BP1

                                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                        p-4

                                                        E-B

                                                        P1

                                                        p

                                                        erc

                                                        en

                                                        t o

                                                        f co

                                                        ntr

                                                        ol

                                                        Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                        301 5248 10626

                                                        0

                                                        50

                                                        100

                                                        150

                                                        200

                                                        250

                                                        c

                                                        b

                                                        a

                                                        A

                                                        -actin

                                                        Nrf2

                                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                        Nrf

                                                        2

                                                        pe

                                                        rce

                                                        nt

                                                        of

                                                        co

                                                        ntr

                                                        ol

                                                        301 5248 10626

                                                        0

                                                        50

                                                        100

                                                        150

                                                        200

                                                        250

                                                        c

                                                        b

                                                        a

                                                        B

                                                        -actin

                                                        HO-1

                                                        Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                        HO

                                                        -1 p

                                                        erc

                                                        en

                                                        t o

                                                        f co

                                                        ntr

                                                        ol

                                                        Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                                        on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                        Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                                        Updated version

                                                        1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                                        Access the most recent version of this article at

                                                        Material

                                                        Supplementary

                                                        89DC1

                                                        httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                                        Manuscript

                                                        Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                                        E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                                        Subscriptions

                                                        Reprints and

                                                        pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                                        To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                                        Permissions

                                                        Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                                        89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                                        Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                        Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                        • Article File
                                                        • Figure 1
                                                        • Figure 2
                                                        • Figures 3-6

                                                          Figure 1 Cancer Research

                                                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                          Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                          301 5248 10626

                                                          0

                                                          100

                                                          200

                                                          300

                                                          400

                                                          500

                                                          c

                                                          b

                                                          a

                                                          A

                                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                          Gen

                                                          iste

                                                          in n

                                                          mo

                                                          ll

                                                          301 5248 10626

                                                          0

                                                          20

                                                          40

                                                          60

                                                          80

                                                          B

                                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                          Dai

                                                          dze

                                                          in n

                                                          mo

                                                          ll

                                                          301 5248 10626

                                                          0

                                                          1

                                                          2

                                                          3

                                                          4a

                                                          b

                                                          c

                                                          C

                                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                          Ova

                                                          ry M

                                                          DA

                                                          n

                                                          mo

                                                          lm

                                                          g p

                                                          rote

                                                          in

                                                          Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                          Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                          301 5248 10626

                                                          0

                                                          50

                                                          100

                                                          150

                                                          a

                                                          b

                                                          c

                                                          A

                                                          -actin

                                                          p-mTOR

                                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                          p-m

                                                          TO

                                                          R

                                                          pe

                                                          rce

                                                          nt

                                                          of

                                                          co

                                                          ntr

                                                          ol

                                                          301 5248 10626

                                                          0

                                                          50

                                                          100

                                                          150

                                                          a

                                                          b

                                                          c

                                                          B

                                                          -actin

                                                          p-p70S6K1

                                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                          p-p

                                                          70

                                                          S6

                                                          K1

                                                          p

                                                          erc

                                                          en

                                                          t o

                                                          f co

                                                          ntr

                                                          ol

                                                          301 5248 10626

                                                          0

                                                          50

                                                          100

                                                          150

                                                          a

                                                          b

                                                          c

                                                          C

                                                          -actin

                                                          p-4E-BP1

                                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                          p-4

                                                          E-B

                                                          P1

                                                          p

                                                          erc

                                                          en

                                                          t o

                                                          f co

                                                          ntr

                                                          ol

                                                          Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                          301 5248 10626

                                                          0

                                                          50

                                                          100

                                                          150

                                                          200

                                                          250

                                                          c

                                                          b

                                                          a

                                                          A

                                                          -actin

                                                          Nrf2

                                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                          Nrf

                                                          2

                                                          pe

                                                          rce

                                                          nt

                                                          of

                                                          co

                                                          ntr

                                                          ol

                                                          301 5248 10626

                                                          0

                                                          50

                                                          100

                                                          150

                                                          200

                                                          250

                                                          c

                                                          b

                                                          a

                                                          B

                                                          -actin

                                                          HO-1

                                                          Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                          HO

                                                          -1 p

                                                          erc

                                                          en

                                                          t o

                                                          f co

                                                          ntr

                                                          ol

                                                          Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                                          on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                          Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                                          Updated version

                                                          1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                                          Access the most recent version of this article at

                                                          Material

                                                          Supplementary

                                                          89DC1

                                                          httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                                          Manuscript

                                                          Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                                          E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                                          Subscriptions

                                                          Reprints and

                                                          pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                                          To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                                          Permissions

                                                          Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                                          89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                                          Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                          Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                          • Article File
                                                          • Figure 1
                                                          • Figure 2
                                                          • Figures 3-6

                                                            Figure 2 Cancer Research

                                                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                            301 5248 10626

                                                            0

                                                            100

                                                            200

                                                            300

                                                            400

                                                            500

                                                            c

                                                            b

                                                            a

                                                            A

                                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                            Gen

                                                            iste

                                                            in n

                                                            mo

                                                            ll

                                                            301 5248 10626

                                                            0

                                                            20

                                                            40

                                                            60

                                                            80

                                                            B

                                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                            Dai

                                                            dze

                                                            in n

                                                            mo

                                                            ll

                                                            301 5248 10626

                                                            0

                                                            1

                                                            2

                                                            3

                                                            4a

                                                            b

                                                            c

                                                            C

                                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                            Ova

                                                            ry M

                                                            DA

                                                            n

                                                            mo

                                                            lm

                                                            g p

                                                            rote

                                                            in

                                                            Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                            Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                            301 5248 10626

                                                            0

                                                            50

                                                            100

                                                            150

                                                            a

                                                            b

                                                            c

                                                            A

                                                            -actin

                                                            p-mTOR

                                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                            p-m

                                                            TO

                                                            R

                                                            pe

                                                            rce

                                                            nt

                                                            of

                                                            co

                                                            ntr

                                                            ol

                                                            301 5248 10626

                                                            0

                                                            50

                                                            100

                                                            150

                                                            a

                                                            b

                                                            c

                                                            B

                                                            -actin

                                                            p-p70S6K1

                                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                            p-p

                                                            70

                                                            S6

                                                            K1

                                                            p

                                                            erc

                                                            en

                                                            t o

                                                            f co

                                                            ntr

                                                            ol

                                                            301 5248 10626

                                                            0

                                                            50

                                                            100

                                                            150

                                                            a

                                                            b

                                                            c

                                                            C

                                                            -actin

                                                            p-4E-BP1

                                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                            p-4

                                                            E-B

                                                            P1

                                                            p

                                                            erc

                                                            en

                                                            t o

                                                            f co

                                                            ntr

                                                            ol

                                                            Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                            301 5248 10626

                                                            0

                                                            50

                                                            100

                                                            150

                                                            200

                                                            250

                                                            c

                                                            b

                                                            a

                                                            A

                                                            -actin

                                                            Nrf2

                                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                            Nrf

                                                            2

                                                            pe

                                                            rce

                                                            nt

                                                            of

                                                            co

                                                            ntr

                                                            ol

                                                            301 5248 10626

                                                            0

                                                            50

                                                            100

                                                            150

                                                            200

                                                            250

                                                            c

                                                            b

                                                            a

                                                            B

                                                            -actin

                                                            HO-1

                                                            Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                            HO

                                                            -1 p

                                                            erc

                                                            en

                                                            t o

                                                            f co

                                                            ntr

                                                            ol

                                                            Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                                            on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                            Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                                            Updated version

                                                            1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                                            Access the most recent version of this article at

                                                            Material

                                                            Supplementary

                                                            89DC1

                                                            httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                                            Manuscript

                                                            Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                                            E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                                            Subscriptions

                                                            Reprints and

                                                            pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                                            To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                                            Permissions

                                                            Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                                            89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                                            Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                            Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                            • Article File
                                                            • Figure 1
                                                            • Figure 2
                                                            • Figures 3-6

                                                              301 5248 10626

                                                              0

                                                              100

                                                              200

                                                              300

                                                              400

                                                              500

                                                              c

                                                              b

                                                              a

                                                              A

                                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                              Gen

                                                              iste

                                                              in n

                                                              mo

                                                              ll

                                                              301 5248 10626

                                                              0

                                                              20

                                                              40

                                                              60

                                                              80

                                                              B

                                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                              Dai

                                                              dze

                                                              in n

                                                              mo

                                                              ll

                                                              301 5248 10626

                                                              0

                                                              1

                                                              2

                                                              3

                                                              4a

                                                              b

                                                              c

                                                              C

                                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                              Ova

                                                              ry M

                                                              DA

                                                              n

                                                              mo

                                                              lm

                                                              g p

                                                              rote

                                                              in

                                                              Figure 3 Cancer Research

                                                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                              Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                              301 5248 10626

                                                              0

                                                              50

                                                              100

                                                              150

                                                              a

                                                              b

                                                              c

                                                              A

                                                              -actin

                                                              p-mTOR

                                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                              p-m

                                                              TO

                                                              R

                                                              pe

                                                              rce

                                                              nt

                                                              of

                                                              co

                                                              ntr

                                                              ol

                                                              301 5248 10626

                                                              0

                                                              50

                                                              100

                                                              150

                                                              a

                                                              b

                                                              c

                                                              B

                                                              -actin

                                                              p-p70S6K1

                                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                              p-p

                                                              70

                                                              S6

                                                              K1

                                                              p

                                                              erc

                                                              en

                                                              t o

                                                              f co

                                                              ntr

                                                              ol

                                                              301 5248 10626

                                                              0

                                                              50

                                                              100

                                                              150

                                                              a

                                                              b

                                                              c

                                                              C

                                                              -actin

                                                              p-4E-BP1

                                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                              p-4

                                                              E-B

                                                              P1

                                                              p

                                                              erc

                                                              en

                                                              t o

                                                              f co

                                                              ntr

                                                              ol

                                                              Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                              301 5248 10626

                                                              0

                                                              50

                                                              100

                                                              150

                                                              200

                                                              250

                                                              c

                                                              b

                                                              a

                                                              A

                                                              -actin

                                                              Nrf2

                                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                              Nrf

                                                              2

                                                              pe

                                                              rce

                                                              nt

                                                              of

                                                              co

                                                              ntr

                                                              ol

                                                              301 5248 10626

                                                              0

                                                              50

                                                              100

                                                              150

                                                              200

                                                              250

                                                              c

                                                              b

                                                              a

                                                              B

                                                              -actin

                                                              HO-1

                                                              Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                              HO

                                                              -1 p

                                                              erc

                                                              en

                                                              t o

                                                              f co

                                                              ntr

                                                              ol

                                                              Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                                              on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                              Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                                              Updated version

                                                              1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                                              Access the most recent version of this article at

                                                              Material

                                                              Supplementary

                                                              89DC1

                                                              httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                                              Manuscript

                                                              Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                                              E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                                              Subscriptions

                                                              Reprints and

                                                              pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                                              To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                                              Permissions

                                                              Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                                              89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                                              Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                              Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                              • Article File
                                                              • Figure 1
                                                              • Figure 2
                                                              • Figures 3-6

                                                                Figure 4 Cancer Research

                                                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                                301 5248 10626

                                                                0

                                                                50

                                                                100

                                                                150

                                                                a

                                                                b

                                                                c

                                                                A

                                                                -actin

                                                                p-mTOR

                                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                                p-m

                                                                TO

                                                                R

                                                                pe

                                                                rce

                                                                nt

                                                                of

                                                                co

                                                                ntr

                                                                ol

                                                                301 5248 10626

                                                                0

                                                                50

                                                                100

                                                                150

                                                                a

                                                                b

                                                                c

                                                                B

                                                                -actin

                                                                p-p70S6K1

                                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                                p-p

                                                                70

                                                                S6

                                                                K1

                                                                p

                                                                erc

                                                                en

                                                                t o

                                                                f co

                                                                ntr

                                                                ol

                                                                301 5248 10626

                                                                0

                                                                50

                                                                100

                                                                150

                                                                a

                                                                b

                                                                c

                                                                C

                                                                -actin

                                                                p-4E-BP1

                                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                                p-4

                                                                E-B

                                                                P1

                                                                p

                                                                erc

                                                                en

                                                                t o

                                                                f co

                                                                ntr

                                                                ol

                                                                Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                                301 5248 10626

                                                                0

                                                                50

                                                                100

                                                                150

                                                                200

                                                                250

                                                                c

                                                                b

                                                                a

                                                                A

                                                                -actin

                                                                Nrf2

                                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                                Nrf

                                                                2

                                                                pe

                                                                rce

                                                                nt

                                                                of

                                                                co

                                                                ntr

                                                                ol

                                                                301 5248 10626

                                                                0

                                                                50

                                                                100

                                                                150

                                                                200

                                                                250

                                                                c

                                                                b

                                                                a

                                                                B

                                                                -actin

                                                                HO-1

                                                                Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                                HO

                                                                -1 p

                                                                erc

                                                                en

                                                                t o

                                                                f co

                                                                ntr

                                                                ol

                                                                Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                                                on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                                Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                                                Updated version

                                                                1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                                                Access the most recent version of this article at

                                                                Material

                                                                Supplementary

                                                                89DC1

                                                                httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                                                Manuscript

                                                                Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                                                E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                                                Subscriptions

                                                                Reprints and

                                                                pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                                                To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                                                Permissions

                                                                Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                                                89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                                                Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                                Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                                • Article File
                                                                • Figure 1
                                                                • Figure 2
                                                                • Figures 3-6

                                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                                  0

                                                                  50

                                                                  100

                                                                  150

                                                                  a

                                                                  b

                                                                  c

                                                                  A

                                                                  -actin

                                                                  p-mTOR

                                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                                  p-m

                                                                  TO

                                                                  R

                                                                  pe

                                                                  rce

                                                                  nt

                                                                  of

                                                                  co

                                                                  ntr

                                                                  ol

                                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                                  0

                                                                  50

                                                                  100

                                                                  150

                                                                  a

                                                                  b

                                                                  c

                                                                  B

                                                                  -actin

                                                                  p-p70S6K1

                                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                                  p-p

                                                                  70

                                                                  S6

                                                                  K1

                                                                  p

                                                                  erc

                                                                  en

                                                                  t o

                                                                  f co

                                                                  ntr

                                                                  ol

                                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                                  0

                                                                  50

                                                                  100

                                                                  150

                                                                  a

                                                                  b

                                                                  c

                                                                  C

                                                                  -actin

                                                                  p-4E-BP1

                                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                                  p-4

                                                                  E-B

                                                                  P1

                                                                  p

                                                                  erc

                                                                  en

                                                                  t o

                                                                  f co

                                                                  ntr

                                                                  ol

                                                                  Figure 5 Cancer Research

                                                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                                  0

                                                                  50

                                                                  100

                                                                  150

                                                                  200

                                                                  250

                                                                  c

                                                                  b

                                                                  a

                                                                  A

                                                                  -actin

                                                                  Nrf2

                                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                                  Nrf

                                                                  2

                                                                  pe

                                                                  rce

                                                                  nt

                                                                  of

                                                                  co

                                                                  ntr

                                                                  ol

                                                                  301 5248 10626

                                                                  0

                                                                  50

                                                                  100

                                                                  150

                                                                  200

                                                                  250

                                                                  c

                                                                  b

                                                                  a

                                                                  B

                                                                  -actin

                                                                  HO-1

                                                                  Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                                  HO

                                                                  -1 p

                                                                  erc

                                                                  en

                                                                  t o

                                                                  f co

                                                                  ntr

                                                                  ol

                                                                  Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                                                  on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                                  Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                                                  Updated version

                                                                  1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                                                  Access the most recent version of this article at

                                                                  Material

                                                                  Supplementary

                                                                  89DC1

                                                                  httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                                                  Manuscript

                                                                  Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                                                  E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                                                  Subscriptions

                                                                  Reprints and

                                                                  pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                                                  To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                                                  Permissions

                                                                  Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                                                  89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                                                  Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                                  Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                                  • Article File
                                                                  • Figure 1
                                                                  • Figure 2
                                                                  • Figures 3-6

                                                                    301 5248 10626

                                                                    0

                                                                    50

                                                                    100

                                                                    150

                                                                    200

                                                                    250

                                                                    c

                                                                    b

                                                                    a

                                                                    A

                                                                    -actin

                                                                    Nrf2

                                                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                                    Nrf

                                                                    2

                                                                    pe

                                                                    rce

                                                                    nt

                                                                    of

                                                                    co

                                                                    ntr

                                                                    ol

                                                                    301 5248 10626

                                                                    0

                                                                    50

                                                                    100

                                                                    150

                                                                    200

                                                                    250

                                                                    c

                                                                    b

                                                                    a

                                                                    B

                                                                    -actin

                                                                    HO-1

                                                                    Genistein levels mghen per day

                                                                    HO

                                                                    -1 p

                                                                    erc

                                                                    en

                                                                    t o

                                                                    f co

                                                                    ntr

                                                                    ol

                                                                    Figure 6 Cancer Research

                                                                    on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                                    Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                                                    Updated version

                                                                    1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                                                    Access the most recent version of this article at

                                                                    Material

                                                                    Supplementary

                                                                    89DC1

                                                                    httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                                                    Manuscript

                                                                    Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                                                    E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                                                    Subscriptions

                                                                    Reprints and

                                                                    pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                                                    To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                                                    Permissions

                                                                    Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                                                    89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                                                    Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                                    Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                                    • Article File
                                                                    • Figure 1
                                                                    • Figure 2
                                                                    • Figures 3-6

                                                                      Published OnlineFirst January 16 2019Cancer Prev Res Kazim Sahin Engin Yenice Birdal Bilir et al Cancer and inhibits Tumor Growth in Hen ModelGenistein Prevents Development of Spontaneous Ovarian

                                                                      Updated version

                                                                      1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289doi

                                                                      Access the most recent version of this article at

                                                                      Material

                                                                      Supplementary

                                                                      89DC1

                                                                      httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentsuppl201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02Access the most recent supplemental material at

                                                                      Manuscript

                                                                      Authoredited Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been

                                                                      E-mail alerts related to this article or journalSign up to receive free email-alerts

                                                                      Subscriptions

                                                                      Reprints and

                                                                      pubsaacrorgDepartment at

                                                                      To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal contact the AACR Publications

                                                                      Permissions

                                                                      Rightslink site Click on Request Permissions which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Centers (CCC)

                                                                      89httpcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorgcontentearly201901161940-6207CAPR-17-02To request permission to re-use all or part of this article use this link

                                                                      Cancer Research on June 9 2020 copy 2019 American Association forcancerpreventionresearchaacrjournalsorg Downloaded from

                                                                      Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on January 16 2019 DOI 1011581940-6207CAPR-17-0289

                                                                      • Article File
                                                                      • Figure 1
                                                                      • Figure 2
                                                                      • Figures 3-6

                                                                        top related