General Meeting Florence 03.12.2010 Secretary General report on Items 5 of the agenda Imrich KORPANEC.
Post on 19-Jan-2016
215 Views
Preview:
Transcript
General Meeting Florence03.12.2010
Secretary General reporton Items 5 of the agenda
Imrich KORPANEC
• authorisation and cross-acceptance of OTM based on EFRTC position paper and joint meeting held in Paris on 05.11.2010• ERA seminar on cross acceptance in Lille on 17.11.2010• some other issues related EFRTC potential participation in the ERA WP for revision of TSI and EC research
Secretary General report
EFRTC GM, Florence, 03.12.2010
EFRTC position paper on OTM authorisation and cross-acceptance
EFRTC GM, Florence, 03.12.2010
• Brief on current situation• Relevance of EC, ERA, CEN and other stakeholders documents and procedures to OTM and EFRTC• Major issues from GM in Paris with participation of ERA and industry• Some case examples of problems encountered• Summary – basic requirements for facilitating OTM authorisation and x-acceptance • Actions taken so far and way forward
• high cost of OTM authorisation/ homologation/ certification – up to 20 % of product
• long time of OTM authorisation for placing into service - up to one year or even more
• with some exception – no cross – acceptance of authorisation even for the same type of machine
• and many more details…
Current situation
EFRTC GM, Florence, 03.12.2010
• Interoperability Directive 2008/57 OTM within scope but application is not mandatory NA are free to apply their specific rules
• Safety Directive 2004/49 No obligations for contractors to implement SMS Safety is a matter of contract between IM/RU and contractor Compliance with ERTMS but only for new vehicles
• ERA regulatory framework - Non existing for OTM as specific category
• CEN and CENELEC standards Voluntary domain only mandatory if included in national standards or as EC/TSI core parameters
OTM relevance
EFRTC GM, Florence, 03.12.2010
• already presented in in general at last GM in Paris by EFRTC President
• but here documented by specific examples as delivered by contractors and industry
• see appendices to the paper
• more examples and quantifications are still expected to be gathered
• ERA is asking for quantification of the size of the OTM market in relation to the costs encountered for taking actions in regulatory framework
Some examples of problems encountered
EFRTC GM, Florence, 03.12.2010
• OTM - small numbers dedicated to work and not run on the network, so not in the same category as locomotives or wagons
• OTM – mobile factory/plant and not vehicle, so either outside EC Directive or as specific case in the Directive
• application of TSI – no cost increase but simplifications, cost and time reduction
• transparency of authorisation and clarity of assessment criteria in all EC regulatory framework and national reference documents
Summary – basic requirements (1)
EFRTC GM, Florence, 03.12.2010
• type certification against TSI by manufacturer to be Europe-wide acknowledged – re-checking strictly limited
• specific national requirements to be declared and known in advance in national reference documents to be accepted by ERA
• exception for X-acceptance – only unique, complex and specific track machines tailored to customer
• Review of current EN 14 033 should be a starting point for OTM authorisation and x-acceptance
Summary – basic requirements (2)
EFRTC GM, Florence, 03.12.2010
• EFRTC position paper was drafted as asked by Board and completed taking into account the outcome of the joint meeting of EFRTC Committees and industry
• GM is now asked to agree that it should serve as a basis for future actions towards NSA and other stakeholders
• subject GM approval EFRTC Board shall call for the meeting with NSA of major European countries (F, G, I, UK)
Actions taken and way forward
EFRTC GM, Florence, 03.12.2010
Objective• to exchange information on mutual recognition and the way railway vehicles are authorised in Europe
• to understand ERA recommendation DV 29 on the authorisation for placing into service structural subsystem and vehicles under the Directive 2008/57/EC before its approval and publishing by EC
Participants• ERA - Executive Director, Dept. Directors and staff concerned, senior administrators from government and NSA, UNIFE, CER, EIM, ERFA and also EFRTC
ERA seminar on cross acceptance (1)
EFRTC GM, Florence, 03.12.2010
Presentations
• ERA - ED, Economic evaluation vehicle authorisation, DV29, Reference document database, Roadmaps
• Governments and NSAs – UK DoT, NL MoT, NRA -Norway and EPSF France
• Stakeholders associations – CER, EIM/RFF, ERFA and UNIFE
• All available in public domain at
http://www.era.europa.eu/Document-Register/Pages/XAcc_seminar_17_Nov_2010.aspx
ERA seminar on cross acceptance (2)
EFRTC GM, Florence, 03.12.2010
Recommended for EFRTC to look at • ERA presentations on Economic evaluation and DV 29Examples of costs for vehicle authorisation, way forward to simplification of procedures
• UK DoT presentation
Complexity in passing the TSI implementation through government and national institutions
Cost first, when benefit of X-acceptance?
• EPSF France
Starting with bilateral agreements dictated by needs and market, examples of procedures
EFRTC established contacts with NSAs from France, Germany, UK and Italy for starting dialog on OTM
ERA seminar on cross acceptance (3)
EFRTC GM, Florence, 03.12.2010
Technology•TSI revision – EFRTC invited to participate at kick off meeting organised by ERA on 07.11.2010
• proposal to ERA for setting up a specific task force for OTM composed of the experts from contractors, OTM supply industry and IMs (and probably later also from NSAs) .
• TF OTM would then deliver recommendations for TSI WPs and other relevant bodies outside of Directive
ERRAC and EC research• Auto – Main project approved for EC funding
• Efficient railway infrastructure call and proposal
Other issues
EFRTC GM, Florence, 03.12.2010
Thank youfor your attention!!!
top related