Fatigue Failures of Vehicle Components · Durability Life Curve Probability of Survival P s Design Spectrum Probability of Occurence P o ≤1 % Design Life Theoretical Probability

Post on 16-Jul-2020

2 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 1

The Automobile Industry in Japan and Germany-ives in the Age of Globalization

12th October 2004 -Tokyo Strategic Challenges and New Perspect

Fatigue Failures of Vehicle Components

by

Vatroslav Grubisic

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 2

1. Introduction

Criteria for the design, classification of vehicle components and product liability

requirements.

2. Influences for the failures

2.1. Design and service loading

2.2. Material and manufacturing

2.3. Usage conditions (Assembly, Environment)

The individual influences will be discussed on examples

and the means to avoid failures presented.

3. Conclusions

Requirements concerning the procedures for the design validation of vehicle

components.

The Automobile Industry in Japan and Germany-Strategic Challenges and New Perspectives in the Age of Globalization

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 3

Recalls in Car Industry

Source:German Traffic Office 2004

DIA

732

9e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 4

Automotive Failures-Occurence and Costs

1

10

100

100080% of Failures Originated

Design Failures

Production Failures

Failure Detection*Failure Occurence

Cos

t pe

r Fa

ilure

Failu

re P

roba

bilit

yD

istr

ibut

ion

* After study Daimler Chrysler/Fraunhofer Society-IPT

Generalized Overview

DIA

729

0e

DEVELOPMENT MANUFACTURING ASSEMBLY USAGE

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 5

Classification of Components Concerning Reability RequirementsD

IA 7

321e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 6

Relation between Operational Stresses and Durability Life

Durability Life (log)

Stre

ss A

mpl

itude

Sa

orS a

SaSa

Ni = Nx (Sa,x / Sa,i)k

DIA

732

2e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 7

Wheel/Hub Assembly of Commercial Vehicles with Drum Brakes

Hub

Bearing

Spindel

Brake Drum

Bolts

Wheel

1

2

3

4

5

6

DIA

388

2e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 8

Influence of Wheel Design on Hub StressesLoad Condition: Cornering

Aluminum Wheel Steel Wheel

Wheel22.5 x 9.00

Steel Wheel

Aluminum Wheel

Measuring PoinRe

lativ

e St

ress

Am

plitu

des

4

DIA

731

7e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 9

Fatigue Fractures on Trailer HubsWheel: 22.5 x 11.75; Tyre: 385/65R22.5 Bridgestone; Wheel rated load: Fz,stat = 55 kN

Fracture in Biaxial Wheel/Hub Test FacilityLoad Programme „Eurocycle“Test Life ≈ 7 000 kmFracture after ≈ 200 000 km Service usageD

IA

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 10

Fatigue Fracture on Cast Hubs for Commercial Vehicles(Nodular Iron GGG 50)

DIA

388

5e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 11

Truck OverloadedD

IA 3

885e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 12

Measurements on roads in Hubei – Province (China)

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 13

Measuring VehicleD

IA

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 14

Pothole Test Track MAO JIAND

IA

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 15

Comparison of Test Spectra (Lt = 15 000 km) Hub, Area Gage 3D

IA

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 16

Influence of Design Spectra on Required Design Modifications

Damage Relation: D China ≈ 5 D Europe

Design Life Relation: L China ≈ 1/5 L Europe

Required Design Modifications

t China = t Europe ⋅nk

1

Europa

China

DD ⋅

t – thickness

k – slope of S-N-Curve

n - ratio of Loading mode

n = 2 (pure bending)

n = 1 (pure tensile/compession)

Required thickness for China compared to Europe for the same operational life and unchanged design of the wheel hub (n = 1.8, k = 7) for hub manufactured from nodular iron:

14.1tt

Europe

China ≈

e.g. from t0 = 12 mm to tnew = 13,7 mm..

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 17

Proof Test in Biaxial Test Facility Load Program CHINACYCLE D

IA

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 18

Fatigue Damage on a Cast Nodular Iron Hub for Dual WheelsD

IA 7

303e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 19

Classification of Allowable and Non-Allowable Pores in Nodular Cast Hubs (GGG 50)

c. Non-allowable outer pore in bearing seat area

b. Non-allowable flange shrinkage

Bearing seat

DIA

731

2e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 20

Areas of Shrinkage and Porosity on Cast Hubs for Commercial Vehicles

DIA

731

3e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 21

Allowable Shrinkage and Porosity on Highly Stressed Areas of Nodular Iron Hubs for Commercial Vehicles

DIA

731

4e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 22

Operational Stresses (Cornering) and Fracture Modes on Steel Wheels

DIA

730

1e α = angle of rotation0° corresponding to load input

x σr = radial stress• σt = tangential stress

σe = equivalent stressσe,3 ≤ 0,95 σe,2

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 23

Fatigue Crack on Welding between Disc and Rim

rim

disc

DIA

730

2e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 24

Fatigue Cracks on Wheels with Large Rims (>7 inches) and Low Profile Tyres Operational Usage 60.000 – 100.000 km

Fracture Initiation Fracture Initiation

Fracture Initiation Fracture Initiation

Wheels: 8J x 17; 9,5 x 16 (240 TR 415); 10,5 x 18

Tyres: 245/40 ZR 17 280/45 VR 415 295/35 ZR 18

8J x 17 9,5 x 16

DIA

733

6e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 25

Procedure for Pre-Loading of Wheels for Durability Approval

Static Pre-Loading:Vertical Force: Fv = 2,5 ⋅ Fv,statTyre pressure: pl = 0,6 ⋅ pl,nHalf tyre width (inside section)Obstacle radius r = 12 cm

cracked section

Fatigue Crack after validation test

Plastic deformation on rim strain gauges

Wh

eelf

orc

es

Strain ε 1000 µm/mPlastic deformation: ∆D = 0,9 mm

DIA

729

8e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 26

Fatigue Cracks at Durability Approval on Wheels after Pre-LoadingD

IA 7

297e

_2

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 27

Influence of the Rim Design on Plastic Deformation and Durability

*

DIA

729

9e

* After Preloading: Fv = 2.5 · Fz,stat; pl = 0.6 · pl,n

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 28

Fracture of Washer (1), Hub (3) and Drive Shaft (2)

1 1 2 3

3 2

DIA

731

9e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 29

Assembly of Drive WheelD

IA 7

318e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 30

Fatigue Failure of Drive Wheel Assembly

Washer1

Spindle End2

Hub3

DIA

734

2e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 31

Steering-Knuckle Arm

Section A-B

Ball Pin

Track Rod Force

DIA

733

7e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 32

Typical Cracks on Steering-Knuckle Arms

rust out

corroded

DIA

733

8e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 33

Design Load Spectrum and Test Results with corroded Steering-Knuckle Arms

Result of tests with36 specimens in usage5 to 8 years and 32.000 to 129.000 km

DIA

733

9e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 34

Reliability Requirements for Safety Components

σa, 50%

Sa,max

Scatter of Allowable Stresses

Durability Life CurveProbability of Survival Ps

Design SpectrumProbability of Occurence Po ≤ 1 %

Design LifeTheoretical Probability ofFailure PF ≤ 10-3 or PF ≤ 10-4

Failure RateScatter of Operational Stresses

LD

50%

Ps = 90% or 99%

Life (log)

Stre

ssA

mp

litu

des

Sa

(lo

g)

Sa,50%

Safety FactorSF=σa,50% / Sa,50%≈1,7 or 2,2

Operational LifeDIA

729

6e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 35

Realibility Requirements at Durability Life Approval

Durability Life (log)

LT – Required test life Lt = Lp· RF

( )( )n4/1NF T/1R =

TN = L90%L10%

n = number of tests

DIA

729

6e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 36

CODEX HAMMURABI (18 Century b.C.)

• If the wall of a house tumbles down, the house builder must repair it with a stronger wall on his own cost.

• If the house collapses because it is not properly built and his owner is killed, the house builder will be killed, too.

DIA

729

6e

Grub\Tokio-Oct2004.ppt 37

The Automobile Industry in Japan and Germany-Strategic Challenges and New Perspectives in the Age of Globalization

12th October 2004 -Tokyo

In every development a certain amount of risk reamains. If we try to

eliminate risks completely, it would be a totally unrealistic goal. But we

have to take into account in the approach we apply to determine the

operational strength and durability, whether or not a safety item is

under consideration and to what degree the function of vehicle is

influenced by possible failure. For such cases the procedures we apply

have to guarantee the whole functionability under operational

usage and we are responsible for the methods we apply to prove

it.

top related