Transcript
Web 2.0 in the ClassroomThe Impact New Technology is Having on
Multiliteracies Practices
Suzanne MastersEducation 6390, Summer 2011
Introduction
Multiliteracie
s
Web 2.0
What does it mean to be Multi-Literate?
1, 2
What does it mean to be Multi-Literate?
3, 4
What does it mean to be Multi-Literate?
5, 6
Student Identity
7,3,8
Student Identity
9,4
Student Identity
10,2
How Multiple Literacies Change the Learning Environment
How Multiple Literacies Change the Learning Environment
11,12
How Multiple Literacies Change the Learning Environment
13, 2, 8
How Multiple Literacies Change the Learning Environment
9, 14
How Multiple Literacies Change the Learning Environment
5, 15, 16, 17
Student Achievement and Engagement in a Web 2.0 Classroom
19
Student Achievement and Engagement in a Web 2.0 Classroom
20,21,22,10
Student Achievement and Engagement in a Web 2.0 Classroom
23,24,25,22
Is it Just Hype?
26
Is it Just Hype?
Web 1.0
Web 2.0
Web 3.0
15,27
Is it Just Hype?
28,17,29,16
Is it Just Hype?
30,31
Is it Just Hype?
32,33
Is it Just Hype?
34,35
Is it Just Hype?
36,32,28
Conclusion
8,11
Conclusion
Conclusion
24,28
Conclusion
31
Conclusion
Multiliteracie
s
Web 2.0
References1. Graham, M.S. & Benson, S. (2010). A springboard rather than a bridge: diving into multimodal literacy.
English Journal, 100(2), 93-97.2. Vasudevan, L. (2010). Literacies in a participatory, multimodal world: the arts and aesthetics of web 2.0.
Language Arts, 88(1), 43-50. 3. Gallagher, K. & Ntelioglou, B.Y. (2011). Which new literacies? Dialogue and performance in youth writing.
Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(5), 322-330. 4. Luo, L. (2009). Web 2.0 integration in information literacy instruction: An overview. The Journal of
Academic Librarianship, 36(1), 32-40.5. Rollett, H., Lux, M., Strohmaier, M., Dosinger, G., & Tochtermann, K. (2007). The web 2.0 way of learning
with technologies. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3(1), 87-107.6. Smythe, S. & Neufeld, P. (2010). Podcast time: Negotiating digital literacies and communities of learning in
a middle years ell classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(6), 488-496.7. Gounari, P. (2009). Rethinking critical literacy in the new information age. Critical Inquiry in Language
Studies, 6(3), 148-175.8. Jewett, P. (2011). Multiple literacies gone wild. The Reading Teacher, 64(5), 341-344.9. Silvers, P., Shorey, M., & Crafton, L. (2010). Critical literacy in a primary multiliteracies classroom: The
hurricane group. Journal of Early Childhood literacy, 10(4), 379-409.10. Attwell, G. (n.d.). Web 2.0 and the changing ways we are using computers for learning: What are the
implications for pedagogy and curriculum. Retrieved June 14, 2011 from http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=web+2.0+and+the+changing+ways+we+are+using+computers+for+learning
11. Haydey, D.C., Magro, K., & Nahachewsky, J. (2007). Multiliteracies: Three studies of classroom practice. English Quarterly Canada, 39(3), 40-56.
12. Collis, B. & Moonen, J. (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: quality perspectives. Educational Media International, 45(2), 93-106.
13. McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M.J.W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf
14. Magolda, P.M. & Platt, G.J. (2009). Untangling web 2.0`s influences on student learning. About Campus, 14(3), 10-16.
References15. Granitz, N. & Koernig, S.K. (2011). Web 2.0 and marketing education: explanations and experiential
applications. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(1), 57-72.16. Clark, W., Logan, K., Luckin, R., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Beyond web 2.0: mapping the technology
landscapes of young learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 56-69.17. Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0, new literacies, and the idea of learning through participation. English Teaching:
Practice and Critique, 8(3), 107-122.18. Chou, P.N. & Chen, H.H. (2008). Engagement in online collaborative learning: A case study using a web 2.0
tool. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 574-582. 19. Shapely, K.S., Sheehan, D., & Maloney, C. (2010). Evaluating the implementation fidelity of technology
immersion and its relationship with student achievement. Journal of Technology, Learning & Assessment, 9(4), 1-68.
20. Dockter, J., Haug, D., & Lewis, C. (2010). Redefining rigor: critical engagement, digital media, and the new English/language arts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(5), 418-420.
21. Conley, M., Freidhoff, J., Sherry, M., & Forbes Tuckey, S. (2008). Book Review of Meeting the challenges of adolescent literacy: Research we have, research we need. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(1), 338-340.
22. Vaughan, N. (2010). Student engagement and web 2.0: what’s the connection?. Education Canada, 2, 52-55.23. Hammett, R.F. (2007). Assessment and new literacies. E-Learning, 4(3), 343-354.24. Williams, P.J. (2009). Technological literacy: a multiliteracies approach for democracy. International Journal of
Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 237-254.25. Williams, J. & Chinn, S.J. (2009). Using web 2.0 to support the active learning experience. Journal of
Information Systems Education, 20(2), 165-174.26. Fahser-Herro, D. & Steinkuehler, C. (2009). Web 2.0 literacy and secondary teacher education. Journal of
Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 55-73. 27. Alexander, B. (2008). Web 2.0 and emergent multiliteracies. Theory Into Practice, 47, 150-160.28. Godwin, P. (2009). Information literacy and Web 2.0: is it just hype?. Electronic Library and Information
Systems, 43(3), 264-274. 29. Grabill, J.T. & Hicks, T. (2005). Multiliteracies meet methods: The case for digital writing in English education.
English Education, 37(4), 301-311.30. Nahachewsky, J. (2007). At the edge of reason: teaching language and literacy in a digital age. E-Learning,
4(3), 355-366.
References31. Ladbrook, J. & Probert, E. (2011). Information skills and critical literacy: Where are our digikids at
with online searching and are their teachers helping?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 105-121.
32. Light, D. (2011). Do web 2.0 right. Learning and Leading with Technology, 38, 11-15.33. Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating
student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 987-995.
34. Handsfield, L.J., Dean, T.R., & Cielocha, K.M. (2009). Becoming critical consumers and producers of text: Teaching literacy with web 1.0 and web 2.0. The Reading Teacher, 63(1), 40-50.
35. Glassman, M. & Kang, M.J. (2011). The logic of wikis: The possibilities of the web 2.0 classroom. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 93-112.
36. Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2007). Researching new literacies: web 2.0 practices and insider perspectives. E-Learning, 4(3), 224-240.
For further information please visit my website: https://sites.google.com/site/education6390/
top related