EuP4Light, good or bad for reducing light pollution in Europe

EuP4Light, good or bad for reducing light pollution in Europe

Friedel Pas

European Liaison Officer International Dark-Sky Association

7th European Symposium for protection of the Night SkyBled, Slovenia

5-6 October 2007

Agenda

• What is EuP

• IDA and EuP-project

• The report

• Recommendations

• Scenario’s

• EU plans with EuP

• What next?

EuP4Light

Directive 2005/32/EC

• Part of the European Climate Change Programme (ECCP)

• EuP = Energy using Products

• What: Increasing Ecological Performance of the complete life cycle.

• Purpose: Reduce greenhouse gasses, beter use of the resources

What is EuP

• Impact analysis for Water / Energy / Garbage

• Product related.

• Must result in eco-desing requirements

• Best sollutions selected in co-operation with stakeholders.

– Energy Labels for refrigerators,…

EuP4Light

• Street lighthing (final text march 2007)• Office Lighting (final text may 2007)• Domestic Lighting (ongoing)• http://www.eup4light.net

Research team:Paul Vantichelen, B.Jansen, T.Geerken, M.Vanden Bosch(Laborelec), V.Van Hoof, L.Vanhooydonk(Kreios),A.Vercalsteren.

IDA Europe Stakeholders:Friedel Pas, Andreas Haenel (Germany), Dr. Jan Hollan (Czech Republica), Dr. Fabio Falchi (Italy)

Wath is EuP

• Product related

• No items on installations

• No existing legislation that is not product related

The report

The report

• Handles about eco-design of:– Lamps– Ballasts– Luminaires– Combination of all– Market analyse– Expected growth of lighting in

Europe.– BAT & BNAT

“fixed lighting installation intended to provide good visibility to users of outdoor public traffic areas during the hours of darkness to support traffic safety, traffic flow and public security” (EN13201)

Performance requirements• Must be comform with EN13201-2• Simplified road categories of EN13201-1:

– Category F “fast traffic”: fast motorized traffic use only.

– Category M “mixed traffic”: motorized traffic, slow moving vehicles, and possibly cyclists and pedestrians.

– Category S “slow traffic”: for mainly urban and pedestrian aimes.

Existing leglislation

• Light pollution/nuisance related:– Most existing legislation not adapted because not

product related.– Lombardy law

• 0 cd/klm over 90°.• Minimum luminance/illuminance = maximum• Dimmable after midnight• Need to be certified.

Data

• Data is underestimated.– Only several countries give real data– Other data incomplete, not available or no response.– Most data estimations on road data.

• Data for 2005 in EU-25:– Road length: 5318766 km– Number of luminaires: 58,904 mlj– Nbr luminaires/capita: 0,12– Nbr luminaires/km road: 11,075 -> 1 lum./90m

when 1lum./30m->1767120km lit roads => 33,2% illuminated.

Crime and lighting

• The absolute reduction of crime by public lighting is not proven and controversial:– Exist no good studies until now.

– Light alone is no cure => need social control.

– Lighting CAN improve social control.

– Lighting increase safety feeling.

Treaths to energy savings on public places

• Lack of interest by authorities:– Financial aspects– Trend of city beautification: aesthetic more important

then eco-desing aspects.

• Lack of interest by architects.• Lack of skilled work force:

– Advanced lighting saving techniques requires aditional skills:

• Telemanagement• Correct installation skills• Fine tuning optic systems• Urban architects need street light design skills.

Light Pollution in the report

• Split in:– Astronomical light pollution.– Ecological light pollution.

• Sky glow most caused by light going into the sky between horizontal and 10°

• No scientific proof of ecological consequences of light pollution.– >Not to deal with it until the consequences are

proven.

Use Phase

• Most efficient luminary bad used can result in very bad energy waste.

BAT and BNAT

• IP66

• Self Cleaning Glasses

• Improve of Utilisation Factor– Limiting ULOR– Maximizing DLOR

Space Height Ratio (SHR)

• Higher SHR have less lighting poles, less installation cost and less energy.– Curved glass have avarage SHR: 5.– FCO with flat glass have avarage SHR: 4

-> not energy efficient solution.• Brewster angle effect• More internal reflection.

• More light reflected to the sky because more light on the road -> more sky glow.

Space Height Ratio (SHR)

• Where the Lombardy law is active:– Flat glass FCO luminaires with SHR 5 to 5,7– By the use of anti-reflection coating.

• Study not recommend it because it is not common available

• Light manufactures said they not offer it everywhere because of a pattent– Pattent is from 1978– Is expired at the moment.

FCO reflect more light

• Because more light on target area.

• So dim the light for have the same lumminance.

• Light going into sky between horizontal and 10° cause most sky glow.

Recommendations

Recomendations

• Products need an information sheet (label)– Information about eco-desing parameters– Luminaires:

• Street light indication + road category• Photometric data• LMF for first 4 years• Maintenance instructions.• UF for standard road conditions.• Installation instructions for optimize UF• Installation instructions to minimize light pollution.

Recomendations

• Generic eco-design requirements on reducing light pollution:– Require manufactures during design

reducing light pollution.

– When no negative effect on energy efficiency.

– When more evidence on environmental significance standardization commissions have to develop harmonized standards.

Recommendations• Luminary efficiency requirements:

ULOR max DLOR min UFF

Cat. F+MAll lamp wattages

5% 75% 6,25%

Cat. S 150W<=lamp 5% 75% 6,25%

Cat. S 100W<=lamp<150W 10% 75% 11,76%

Cat. S 50W<=lamp<100W 15% 70% 17,65%

Cat. S lamp<50W 20% 65% 23,53%

Recommendations

• Optional use of dimmable ballasts– Cat.F +M: implementing before 2010, >=70W

before 2015– Good for avoiding over lighting (reflection)– Good for controlling light depending on traffic

numbers trough the night.

Additional recommendations

• EN-13201:– Maximum light levels.– Peformance requirements for traffic density on

hourly base.

• Member states need to invest in inventory of their infrastructure.

EU plans with EuP

EU plans with EuP

• Questions in EP:– We are busy with light pollution by EuP4Light

• Brussels European Council on 9/3 on CO2 reduction:“invites the Commission to rapidly submit proposals to

enable increased energy efficiency requirements on office and street lighting to be adopted by 2008 and on incandescent lamps and other forms of lighting in private households by 2009;”

What is next

What is next…

• Evaluation commission of energy– Can accept of not accept the contence of the

study.– Translate the recommendations in directive

proposals.

What next

• Proposals go to the commissioners

• Commissioners send it to EP

• When Commission and EP not agree, also opinion of the European Council

=> MEP’s need to awake in time

More information

• EuP4Light document is online:http://www.eup4light.net

• IDA Europe comments and actionsFriedel PasEuropean Liaison OfficerAarschotsebaan 293191 HeverBelgiumTel.: +32-474-501795e-mail: europe@darksky.org