Environmental Reporting reusing INSPIRE Approaches & Examples
Post on 12-Apr-2022
3 Views
Preview:
Transcript
Christian Ansorge
4th September 2017, Strasbourg
Environmental Reporting reusing
INSPIRE
Approaches & Examples
Reportnet – EEA view
Deliveries per day
Data reporting – The INSPIRE maze
Data Manager
Create
Dataset A
Transform
Dataset A
Provide Dataset
A.1 for
INSPIRE
Provide Dataset
A.2 for EEA
reporting
Provide Dataset
A.3 for other
reporting
Receive
Dataset
Merge Dataset
A with other
data
Reporting
Receiver
Data User
Reporting of data
Provide
specifications
European
Commission
INSPIRE and Reporting
Generic
Reporting concept – basic assumptions:
• MS shall provide data in the scope of INSPIRE
(harmonized, interoperable, via network services) by 2020
latest.
• Data provided under INSPIRE shall be reused and MS aim
to avoid multiple provision of data.
• For better support of environmental policies more direct,
frequent and timely access to the environmental data is
needed
Requirements for reporting system:
• Need for a systematic approach towards modern
Reporting
• Generic and reusable approach in different data flows
• Minimum demands on provider and consumer side
• More coherent and streamlined
• Reduce fragmentation of approaches and technical
solutions
INSPIRE and Reporting
Generic
From generic ideas towards blueprint
What does it mean to re-use INSPIRE?
What is most relevant for reporting?
1. Data models (for interoperability and integration)
2. Organisational infrastructure (capacity and efficiency)
3. Web services (availability and access)
4. Metadata (transparency and discovery)
INSPIRE and Reporting
Blu
eprin
t
• Strategy paper: – „The future of eReporting and the link to INSPIRE“
– Data Typology as one main element
INSPIRE and Reporting
Futu
re Current reporting obligations
Type 1
Geospatial reference data
Type 2
Environmental data
Type 3
Textual or contextual data and information
INSPIRE and Reporting
8
Reporting obligation
INSPIRE*
Data Manager
Creates
dataset
EEA
Provide
specifications
DG Env
* The proportion of the overlap of the scope of the INSPIRE Annex Themes and the reporting obligations can vary (e.g.
there is no overlap at all).
Type 2 (and 3)
Type 1
INSPIRE and Reporting
9
Data typology in practice
INSPIRE and Reporting
10
EU Registry data model
INSPIRE and Reporting
• 3 possible Reporting & Extension approaches
– Integration
• Multiple INSPIRE Themes (Type 1) and environmental data (Type
2) in one ”super schema”
• E.g. Air Quality eReporting
– Extension
• Singular INSPIRE Theme (Type 1) is extended by environmental
data (Type 2)
• E.g. EU Registry
– Linking (”Linked Approach”)
• Environmental data (Type 2) is pointing towards multiple INSPIRE
Themes (Type 1) but provided seperately
• E.g. CDDA 2018
• consistent design approaches (both embedded in SDI)
INSPIRE and eReporting
…
…
Thematic requirements
INSPIRE DS 1
INSPIRE DS 2
etc.
One schema containing …
INSPIRE DS 1 (via INSPIRE service)
INSPIRE DS 2(via INSPIRE service)
Thematic requirements
Links on object and
dataset level
Reported data (file or service)
INSPIRE
infrastructure
Integrated approach Linked approach
INSPIRE and Reporting
Linked Approach and CDDA 2018
Linked Approach and CDDA 2018
CDDA
• Common Database on Designated Areas
• Nationally designated protected areas (e.g.
nature reserve, national parks, etc.)
• EIONET core data flow
• Not part of the environmental legislation
• Rather simple data model
Geometry (Shapefiles)
Tabular data (XML/MS Access files)
Reportnet CDRcommon identifier
Upload as package
Reportnet CDR
Tabular data(XML/XLS files)
• Elements NOT included in the INSPIRE data models
INSPIRE modelProtected Sites
(GML file)• Geometry and core elements
common identifier
Upload as package
Current reporting approach in CDDA
CDDA 2018 approach re-using INSPIRE Protected Sites
CDDA Designated Area• Various IDs• Designated area type• Official area (ha)• Major ecosystem type• Marine percentage • Metadata fields
CDDA match• Geometry of site• Site name• Designation date• Designation type• IUCN category
Linked Approach and CDDA 2018
EU Registry on industrial emissions(thanks to Daniel Montalvo, EEA & Mark Gibbs, Aether)
Project overview:
The EU Registry on Industrial
Sites is planned to centralise
the collection of identification
and administrative data for:
• E-PRTR facilities
• IED installations
• Large combustion
plants (LCPs)
• Waste incineration
plants
(WI)
In addition, the EU Registry will
act as a reference dataset to
which thematic data reporting
would refer to.
Internal
Systems
EU Registry On
Industrial Sites
E-PRTR & LCP
Data
Cro
sslin
ked d
ata
bases
EU Registry (all
industrial sites)
E-PRTR facility
and emissions
data
LCP installation
part and
emissions data
Member states EEA Public
Administrative
data
Industrial pollution data flows
Thematic data
2
Do we still have 5 minutes time?
Thanks!
INSPIRE and reporting
Environmental reporting via INSPIRE download services
Starting point
”The EEA should
harvest web-services!”
”Let’s reuse INSPIRE!”
”We need to control what
is going to be reported!”
”INSPIRE is enough
burden already!”
”INSPIRE is
for reporting!”
aka ”push”
aka ”pull” ”This is legally
challenging!
Environmental reporting via INSPIRE download services
”Does download service reporting makes sense?”
Environmental reporting via INSPIRE download services
Dataset
How large is the file?• Large
• Small
How often it needs to be
reported?• Often (e.g. 30 mins)
• Not often (e.g. 6 years)
How well it is implemented
in INSPIRE?• Wide coverage
• Scarce
Is there a public interest?• Large (e.g. Bathing water, Air Quality)
• Hardly (e.g. INSPIRE monitoring)
Is it reported to other
stakeholders?• Many others (e.g. UNEP)
• Only to the EEA
Is the data relevant for other
reportings as well?• Yes, it is part of many other data flows
• No, there is only this data flow
What is the share of INSPIRE on the overall data flow?• Large and clearly defined
• Small or spatial part is not very relevant
Environmental reporting via INSPIRE download services
”What do you expect from reporting via download service?”
Environmental reporting via INSPIRE download services
”What do you expect from reporting via download service?”
• Saving costs or efficiency gains?
• Gaining political value or visibility?
• Making data more broadly available?
• New opportunities? (which ones?)
....
Let’s discuss!
Thanks
Christian Ansorge
European Environment Agency
top related