Embedded Value for Insurance Company - Actuarial … 5 Basic Components of Embedded Value Actuarial Appraisal Value Actuarial Appraisal Value Value of Future Business Value of Future
Post on 15-May-2018
214 Views
Preview:
Transcript
1
Insurance and Actuarial Advisory Services
Actuarial Services Group
Embedded Value for Insurance CompanyJonathan Zhao, FSA, FCIA, FCA, MAAA
October 17, 2005
22
AgendaAgenda
General overview of embedded value
Components of embedded value
Deterministic vs. Stochastic EV
Practical Application – EV at Risk
Development of EV framework
33
General overview of embedded General overview of embedded valuevalue
EV reporting\disclosure is widespread in U.K., Europe, Australia
EV reporting is now required by China Insurance Regulatory Commission (CIRC) for all Chinese Insurance Companies
May be included in published financial statements, in presentations to analysts and rating agencies
Increasingly common in the U.S and China for Incentive Compensation
Use for pricing and plan validation (Global)
Stochastic EV is used for Enterprise Risk Management
European Embedded Value and Market Consistent EV
4
Insurance and Actuarial Advisory Services
Components of Embedded ValueComponents of Embedded Value
55
Basic Components of Embedded Basic Components of Embedded ValueValue
Actuarial
Appraisal
Value
Actuarial
Appraisal
Value
Value ofFuture
Business
Value ofFuture
Business
AdjustedNet WorthAdjusted
Net Worth
Value ofInforce
Business
Value ofInforce
Business Embedded
Value
Embedded
Value
66
Value of InforceValue of Inforce
Present Value (PV) of Distributable Earnings = PV after-tax book profits – PV Cost of Capital
Distributable Earnings (year t)= After-tax Book Profit (year t)+ TS Released (year t)+ After-tax earnings on TS (year t)
Allocate assets to business lines, project cash flows using best estimate assumptions, include statutory reserves, discount distributable earnings to
present value at a hurdle rate reflecting risk
Allocate assets to business lines, project cash flows using best estimate assumptions, include statutory reserves, discount distributable earnings to
present value at a hurdle rate reflecting risk
77
PV Cost of CapitalPV Cost of Capital
Timing difference between TS now and future TS releases net of after-tax investment earnings on assets backing TS= Target Surplus – PV Future Target Surplus Released – PV Future after-tax earnings on assets backing TS
88
Adjusted Net WorthAdjusted Net Worth
= Statutory capital and surplus (i.e., target surplus)
+ Allocations of surplus, such as AVR
+ Non-admitted assets with realizable value
+ Reduced for the value of any obligations not considered in the value of inforce
+ Adjustment for difference between market value and book value of assets backing adjusted net worth
Target surplus is usually included in adjusted net worth for presentation purposesTarget surplus is usually included in adjusted net worth for presentation purposes
99
Embedded Value Change = Embedded Value Change = ““Value AddedValue Added”” or or ““Achieved ProfitsAchieved Profits””
Achieved Profit Amount
Achieved Profit Amount
StartingEmbedded
Value
StartingEmbedded
Value
EndingEmbedded
Value
EndingEmbedded
Value
AdjustedNet
Worth
AdjustedNet
Worth
Valueof Inforce
Valueof Inforce
S/H DividendS/H Dividend
AdjustedNet WorthAdjusted
Net Worth
Value fromNew SalesValue fromNew Sales
Value ofSurvivingInforce
Value ofSurvivingInforce
Achieved Profits
= Unwinding of discount (at hurdle rate)
+/- Variances from expected distributable earnings
+ Value of new business added during the year
+ Stockholder dividends paid, if any
1010
Sample Deterministic EV ResultsSample Deterministic EV Results
17,093,861 14,197,287 Total Embedded Value
12,749,801 10,416,296 Total Value of Existing Business
(1,254,137)(1,127,290)Cost of Capital
14,003,938 11,543,586Present Value of Future Profit
Value of Existing Business
4,344,061 3,780,991 Total Adjusted Statutory Capital and Surplus
--Adjustments to Statutory Capital and Surplus
--Free Surplus
4,344,061 3,780,991 Target Surplus
Adjusted Statutory Book Value
20052004Year
1111
Sample EV Movement AnalysisSample EV Movement AnalysisEmbedded Value Added or Achieved Profits ($MM)
$1.14
100%
$17.11
2004 EV 8% Return on Existing Business
EV
New Business EV
8% Return on New
Business EV
$0.3
Capital Transfer
2005 EV
$0.11
$14.2
8%
10%
1%2%
121%
$1.36
1212
EV Reporting AdvantageEV Reporting Advantage
Provides an economic measure of performance and current value (excluding new business)
Reflects cost of capital
Closely linked to commonly accepted actuarial appraisal methodology
Provides valuable insight regarding profitability of new business and returns on economic capital
13
Insurance and Actuarial Advisory Services
Deterministic vs. Stochastic EVDeterministic vs. Stochastic EV
1414
Deterministic EVDeterministic EV
Traditional Embedded Value uses a set of best estimate assumptions
Single, deterministic scenarioReflects overall risk in the discount rateHigher discount rate for riskier products
Easy to implement and understand
However,Focused primarily on interest-rate riskDoes not reflect tail exposure Unable to measure the interaction of risks
1515
Stochastic EVStochastic EV
Enables companies to capture the interaction of risks
Quantifies risks (total enterprise basis & by line of business)
Helps management to determine a comfortable level of risk and to optimize the risk/reward relationships
An approach that distinguishes a company from its competitors in terms of enterprise risk measurement and management
1616
What is Stochastic EV?What is Stochastic EV?
Examples of simple applicationVarious interest rate scenarios used in cash flow testingSensitivity testing (e.g., increasing lapse rate, lower mortality rate)
Formal stochastic approachIdentify risk elements (e.g., interest, mortality, and default)Use a stochastic process to define a range of selected risk elements (e.g., Monte Carlo, Economic Scenario Generator)Run EV model over a range for selected risk elements
Start with a deterministic modelStochastic Assumption = deterministic assumption x
stochastically generated factor
17
Insurance and Actuarial Advisory Services
Practical Application Practical Application –– EV at RiskEV at Risk
1818
Embedded Value at Risk ConceptEmbedded Value at Risk Concept
EV at risk is similar to the VAR concept - used for enterprise risk management
EV@Risk TM : Difference between the mean EV value and the fifth percentile EV for each risk element (other confidence interval levels could also be used)
Shows variance in EV over a range of economic and non-economic scenarios
Quantifies impact to EV for each individual risk elementsDemonstrates the correlation effect between different risk elements (i.e., sum of individual risk components is greaterthan when all the risks are run together)
Allows management to determine a comfortable level of risk
Requires stochastic EV modeling in order to determine different levels of EV@Risk TM
1919
Sample of Sample of EV@RiskEV@Risk
Comparison of Stochastic Runs
$796
$798
$800
$802
$804
$806
$808
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90
Embe
dded
Val
ue a
t 12/
31/0
1 (m
)
Stoch Lapse Only
Stoch Mortality Only
Stoch Lapse &MortalityBase Run
5th Percentile5th Percentile
MeanMean
2020
Stochastic Interest Results Stochastic Interest Results -- Universal LifeUniversal Life
Universal Life - Stochastic Interest
(200,000)
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1,600,000
0.01 0.12 0.22 0.33 0.43 0.54 0.64 0.75 0.85 0.96
Valu
e of
Exi
stin
g Bu
sine
ss
Stochastic Interest Deterministic
Result % of MeanMean 561,599 100.00%Median 621,222 110.62%Minimum (142,731) -25.42%Maximum 879,532 156.61%Deterministic 561,872 100.05%
Statistics
Result % of Mean5th 163,304 29.08%25th 463,958 82.61%50th 621,222 110.62%75th 700,990 124.82%95th 775,944 138.17%
Percentile
2121
Stochastic Interest Results Stochastic Interest Results -- Universal LifeUniversal Life
Observations:2004 GAAP earnings at risk is about 0.0% versus the mean results while EV@Risk TM is about 30.1%.
EV@Risk TM is 70.9% when calculated without target surplus
Observations:2004 GAAP earnings at risk is about 0.0% versus the mean results while EV@Risk TM is about 30.1%.
EV@Risk TM is 70.9% when calculated without target surplus
Deterministic Mean EaRisk 5th 25th 50th 75th 95thGAAP Eanings 2004 179,232$ 179,014$ 56$ 178,958$ 178,996$ 179,018$ 179,034$ 179,077$ GAAP Earnings 2004-2007 778,388$ 777,616$ 1,362$ 776,254$ 777,206$ 777,605$ 778,256$ 779,014$ Embedded Value 1,324,758$ 1,324,485$ 398,295$ 926,190$ 1,226,844$ 1,384,108$ 1,463,875$ 1,538,830$ Embedded Value w/o TS 561,872$ 561,599$ 398,295$ 163,304$ 463,958$ 621,222$ 700,990$ 775,944$
Universal Life Results - Stochastic InterestPercentile
2222
Summary of Stochastic Results Summary of Stochastic Results –– All All
Percentile All Interest Mortality Defaults5th 173,862 178,958 174,652 176,58225th 177,220 178,996 177,198 177,57250th 179,126 179,018 178,679 178,64575th 180,976 179,034 180,672 180,02495th 184,316 179,077 182,711 182,448
Mean 179,116 179,014 178,764 178,931EaRisk 5,254 56 4,112 2,349
Correlation (1,264) Deterministic 179,232
2004 Operating Earnings - Universal Life
Percentile All Interest Mortality Defaults5th 954,438 926,190 1,264,557 1,107,44525th 1,137,281 1,226,844 1,298,890 1,234,91150th 1,337,677 1,384,108 1,319,582 1,314,28275th 1,514,501 1,463,875 1,344,527 1,443,07695th 1,692,022 1,538,830 1,377,207 1,554,656
Mean 1,323,899 1,324,485 1,321,195 1,320,977EVaRisk 369,460 398,295 56,637 213,532
Correlation (299,004) Deterministic 1,324,758
2004 Embedded Value - Universal Life
23
Insurance and Actuarial Advisory Services
EV Reporting Framework DevelopmentEV Reporting Framework Development
2424
Market Consistent EV Reporting - there are discussions within the industry about the use of market-consistent EV techniques (MCEV). Several major European insurance companies have started piloting MCEV in some business units, to keep up with the ever changing demands regarding financial reporting.
Developed in the late 1980’s,
early 1990’s
CFO Forum published EEV
Principles in May 2004
Work in Progress
No defined approach
Move to Fair Value / Market consistent Financial Reporting
Traditional Embedded
Value Reporting
European Embedded
Value (CFO Forum)
Market Consistent
Embedded Values
Embedded Value Reporting Embedded Value Reporting DevelopmentsDevelopmentsTraditional EV Reporting - best estimated assumption, focus primarily on interest rate, easy to implement and understand, but not consistent across companies.
Achieved profit (EV value added) are calculated based on the traditional EV reporting, it provides a considerable amount of useful information about a company’s performance and where profits (or losses) are coming form.
European Embedded Value (EEV) Reporting –CFO Forum’s 12 EEV principles are aimed to provide transparent and consistent financial information to the investors across major European insurance companies. Required the use of stochastic modeling for financial options and guarantees
2525
European Embedded Value European Embedded Value PrinciplesPrinciples
The CFO Forum launched European Embedded Value (EEV) Principles in 2003
EEV principles are aimed to provide transparent and consistent financial information to the investors across major European insurance companies
2626
European Embedded Value European Embedded Value Principles Principles -- continuescontinues
2727
Market Consistent EVMarket Consistent EV
Advantages
Consistent with financial market pricing of risk
Less subjectivity in setting discount rates
Properly values items with observable market values
Disadvantages
Not aligned with how insurance business is priced or managed
Lack of suitable long term options for calibration
Subjective valuation of frictional costs
• Fair value approach
• Use risk neutral / arbitrage free scenarios
2828
Closing RemarksClosing Remarks
EV is becoming a global financial reporting and measurement framework
Can be used to create an effective decision support framework
Act as an early warning systemRisk management and optimizationReconcile with product pricingFacilitate capital allocationSegue to IAS/IFRS accounting
PitfallsRequire a robust actuarial modeling toolShort term business might present difficultiesDifficult choice of discount rate (deterministic EV)Determination of stochastic scenariosCommunication to senior managements
top related