Elementary deformation processes during low temperature ...
Post on 07-Jun-2022
6 Views
Preview:
Transcript
Elementary Deformation Processes duringLow Temperature and High Stress Creep
of Ni-base Single Crystal Superalloys
Dissertation
zur
Erlangung des Grades
Doktor-Ingenieurin
der
Fakultat fur Maschinenbau
der Ruhr-Universitat Bochum
von
Xiaoxiang Wu
aus
Jiangxi, China
Bochum, 2016
Dissertation eingereicht am: 18.10.2016
Tag der mundlichen Prufung: 09.12.2016
Erster Referent: Prof. Dr. Gunther Eggeler
Zweiter Referent: Prof. Dr. Dierk Raabe
Abstract
Ni-base single crystal superalloys have been widely used as gas turbine materials due to
their superior creep and fatigue properties at high temperatures. In the form of single
crystals, high angle grain boundaries are absent, which are the preferred sites for crack
initiation. The outstanding mechanical properties originate from the microstructure.
Ni-base single crystal superalloys contain two phases: the matrix γ phase, which is
an FCC structure and the precipitate γ′ phase, which is an ordered FCC structure
called L12. Researchers have found that creep, the time-dependent plastic deformation
of materials strongly depends on microstructures and different temperature and stress
regimes feature different deformation mechanisms. The present work focuses on the
deformation regime of low temperature and high stress, i.e., 750 ◦C and 800 MPa.
The material investigated in present work is a second generation Ni-base single crys-
tal superalloy ERBO/1 with around 3% Re. Miniature creep specimens with a gauge
length of 9 mm have been precisely [001]-oriented using the Laue method. Uniaxial
tensile creep tests have been interrupted after strains of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 1, 2 and 5%,
respectively. Transmission electron microscopy has been mainly employed to investi-
gate the microstructure evolution during the creep process and to interpret the creep
behavior.
A peculiar type of creep behavior has been observed for the material at 750 ◦C and
800 MPa. It has been found that there are two creep rate minima, i.e, a fast decrease
of creep rate at 0.1% and a broader creep rate minimum at 5%. It can be referred to
as double minimum creep behavior. This kind of creep behavior has been observed by
other researchers as well, however, this has never been explained. An effort has been
made to rationalize this peculiar type of creep behavior. Three mechanisms have been
proposed for the first minimum of creep rate, i.e., the composite character of Ni-base
single crystal superalloys, an exhaustion mechanism for vertical channel dislocations
due to the high applied stress and a run and stop mechanism for horizontal channel
dislocations due to the irregular placement and size-distribution of γ′ particles. Both
planar defects and dislocations have been quantified and the increase of creep rate from
the first minimum is related to both kinds of defects. The strain hardening leads to
the second broad creep rate minimum.
Acknowledgement
This thesis was performed during my time at the Ruhr-Univeristat Bochum as a scholar
of the International Max-Planck Research School on Surface and Interface Engineering
in Advanced Materials (IMPRS SurMat). I would like to thank all members of the
Institute of Materials for their support. I also enjoyed the contacts with my colleagues
from SurMat.
My special thanks go to Prof. Eggeler for his support and for supervising this thesis.
Prof. Eggeler offered me the opportunity to study Ni-base single crystal superalloys and
supported me in my research work. He helped me become familiar with the fascinating
world of elementary deformation mechanism. Prof. Raabe is highly acknowledged for
the fruitful discussions and for co-advising my thesis, which opened my horizon and
inspired me to keep making progress.
I appreciate the tremendous help and support from Prof. Dlouhy as well, who intro-
duced me to diffraction contrast TEM for defect analyses and whom I had the oppor-
tunity to collaborate with in my research project. Everything would have been much
more difficult without the support and help from my direct supervisors, Dr. Somsen
and Dr. Kostka. They were always there for me whenever I had problems with TEM.
They also helped me with settlings in my new German research environment.
Without the kind help of my colleagues my research work could not have been carried
out in sort of good way. Dr. Parsa showed great patience and devoted lots of time
showing me TEM sample preparation. Philip Wollgramm kindly provided all the creep
specimens. Dr. Jaeger and Dr. Depka encouraged me to open up to other people.
Dr. Neuking and Dr. Frenzel are always so patient to answer my questions. Special
thanks also go to K. Strieso, S. Jordan, N. Linder, D. Rose and M. Bienek for their
kind support in sample preparation and SEM investigation. As a “trouble maker”, I’m
also very grateful for the help from Suzana, Frank and Denis. The list can go on and
on.
My deepest and most grateful thanks go to my family and friends. Their encourage-
ment and support make me feel that I am never alone far away from home. There are
no more words than sincere thanks for Yu, for his never-ending support and always
being by my side.
Contents
Abbreviations viii
Symbols x
1 Introduction 1
2 Background 32.1 Ni-base single crystal superalloys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32.2 Creep deformation of metals and alloys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72.3 Creep deformation of Ni-base single crystal superalloys . . . . . . . . . 102.4 Miniature tensile creep testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182.5 Transmission electron microscopy of defects in Ni-base single crystal
superalloys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3 Scientific Objectives 43
4 Materials and Experiments 454.1 Alloy and heat treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454.2 Interrupted miniature creep tests at low temperature and high stress . 494.3 Scanning electron microscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 494.4 Transmission electron microscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504.5 Determination of γ′ volume fractions, γ channel widths and γ′ cube edge
lengths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 514.6 Planar faults quantification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524.7 Dislocation density quantification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 534.8 TEM foil thickness determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554.9 Tilt experiments for identification of linear and planar defects . . . . . 56
5 Results 615.1 Double minimum creep at low temperature and high stress . . . . . . . 615.2 Microstructure evolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 635.3 Evolution of dislocation and planar fault densities . . . . . . . . . . . . 775.4 Identification of dislocation character . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 805.5 Identification of planar fault displacement vectors R . . . . . . . . . . . 87
6 Discussion 1016.1 On the need of further work to explain primary creep . . . . . . . . . . 1016.2 Composite character and stress transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1026.3 Exhaustion of grown-in misfit dislocations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1036.4 Interpretation of glide of grown dislocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
6.5 Time spent at the first local minimum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1076.6 Observation for intermediate local maximum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1086.7 Strain hardening: towards a global minimum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1106.8 Local TEM observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
7 Summary and Conclusions 117
References 123
Appendices 133
List of Figures
2.1 Microstructure and crystal structure of Ni-base single crystal superal-
loy. (a) STEM HAADF image. (b) FCC structure: γ phase. (c) L12
structure: γ′ phase. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 EPMA mapping showing large scale elements partitioning (dendritic and
interdendritic regions). (a) Al partitions to interdendritic regions. (b)
Re partitions to dendritic regions [14, 15]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.3 Segregation of elements in ID region to γ′ cubes (first row) and γ chan-
nels (second row) [14, 15]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.4 Shape of a generic text book creep curve. (a) Strain ε plotted as a
function of time t. (b) Logarithmic strain rate plotted as a function of
strain [15, 18]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.5 Stress-rupture plot [17, 19, 20]. (a) Constant temperature. (b) Changing
temperatures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.6 Creep curve shapes which are associated with density controlled (type
I, alloy type) and obstacle controlled (type II, pure metal type) creep
[23, 24]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.7 SEM images showing two types of rafting. (a) Rafting perpendicular to
the loading direction. (b) Rafting parallel to the loading direction [28]. 11
2.8 Three possible cutting mechanisms into the γ′ particles. (a) a〈112〉 cut-
ting, with generation of SISF and SESF. (b) a〈110〉 cutting with SISF.
(c) a〈110〉 cutting with SESF [47]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.9 Detailed analysis of γ′ cutting mechanism. (a) A TEM image indicating
stacking fault cutting mechanism. (b) Proposed model corresponding to
the TEM image [47]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.10 Illustration of {111} projection of L12 structure, Al atoms are in gray
and Ni atoms are in white. Circles represent atoms at the top layer, while
rectangles and triangles represent middle and bottom layers respectively.
Three 〈110〉 and 〈112〉 directions are indicated, adapted and modified
from [3]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.11 Illustration of an APB generation due to the top layer shear of vector
bAPB=a/2[101], two dashed rectangles indicates the forbidden bond of
Al-Al, adapted from [3]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
i
LIST OF FIGURES
2.12 Illustration of a SISF generation due to top layer shear of vector bSISF=a/3[211],
the top layer sits directly on top of the bottom layer [3]. The circles have
the same meaning as in Fig 2.10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
2.13 Illustration of a SESF generation due to top layer shear of vector bSESF=a/3
[211]. A new top layer has generated. The symbols have the same mean-
ing as in Fig 2.10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.14 Illustration of a CSF generation due to top layer shear of vector bCSF=a/6[112],
the top layer sits directly on top of the bottom layer and forbidden bonds
form. The symbols have the same meaning as in Fig 2.10, adapted from
[3]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.15 Illustration of stacking sequence of intrinsic and extrinsic stacking faults
with regard to dislocations [66]. (a) S-fault. (b) D-fault. . . . . . . . . 26
2.16 Schematic drawing showing the generation of diffraction contrast [61]. . 28
2.17 Schematic drawing showing two-beam conditions with different s value.
(a) Exact two-beam condition, s =0. (b) Positive s. (c) Negative s [61, 62]. 29
2.18 Illustration of s value and intensity distribution with s value [62]. . . . 30
2.19 Illustration of different modes in conventional TEM. (a) BF. (b) DF. (c)
CDF. (d) WBDF. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.20 Comparison between CTEM and STEM modes [68]. . . . . . . . . . . . 32
2.21 Illustration of STEM mode configuration [69]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
2.22 Two g-conditions for stereo images. (a) Before rotation. (b) After rotation. 34
2.23 STEM images showing dislocations in Ni-base single crystal superalloy
CMSX-4 type. (a) BF image. (b) HAADF image. . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
2.24 Illustration of dislocation contrast. (a) When dislocation is parallel to
reflecting planes. (b) When dislocation is not parallel to reflecting planes
[62]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
2.25 Computed stacking fault intensity image profile for α =+2π/3 with
anomalous absorption [61, 71]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
2.26 TEM images showing contrast of stacking fault. (a) BF image. (b) CDF
image. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
2.27 Systematic flow chart showing the criterion for SF nature determination
[61–63]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
2.28 TEM images showing the contrast of an APB. (a) The APB in contrast
with the superlattice diffraction (100). (b) The APB out of contrast
with the matrix diffraction (200) [73, 74]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
4.1 (a) ERBO plate. (b) Cut-up plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
4.2 Schematic drawing showing multi-step heat treatment [14]. . . . . . . . 47
4.3 Flow chart showing solution heat treatment process. . . . . . . . . . . . 48
ii
LIST OF FIGURES
4.4 Flow chart showing precipitation heat treatment process. . . . . . . . . 48
4.5 (a) Size and geometry for the miniature creep specimen. (b) Miniature
specimen in furnace for high temperature creep [85, 86]. . . . . . . . . . 48
4.6 Illustration of TEM specimens cutting from the creep miniature speci-
men. (a) [001] cutting and (b) [111] cutting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4.7 Illustration of defect quantification. (a) TEM montage images taken af-
ter 2% strain, g : (111). (b) Field F1 from (a) at a higher magnification.
(c) Reference grid for determination of dislocation density from Field F2
of (a). (d) Illustration of counting procedure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
4.8 Illustration of the thickness measurement using CBED. (a) A TEM im-
age with a white spot indicating beam position, with diffraction pattern
as an inset image. (b) Measurement of distance Dd between transmitted
and diffracted disks. (c) Measurement of fringe distances. (d) Calcula-
tion of foil thickness and extinction distance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
4.9 Illustration of measurement of s. (a) Illustration of x and R value. (b)
Example of an operating g-condition. (c) Measurement of x and R from
the operating g diffraction pattern. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
5.1 Creep curves from interrupted tests of ERBO / 1C (750 ◦C and 800 MPa).
(a) Strain ε as a function of time t. (b) Logarithm of creep rate as a func-
tion of strain. (c) Logarithm of creep rate as a function of logarithmic
strain. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
5.2 TEM images showing microstructure of ERBO/1 at initial state. (a)
STEM BF image. (b) STEM HAADF image. (c) HRTEM of the γ
phase. (d) HRTEM of the γ′ phase. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
5.3 SEM micrographs of the γ/γ′ microstructure of ERBO/1C before and
after creep at 750 ◦C and 800 MPa. (a) Initial state, [001] cross section.
(b) Initial state, [111] cross section. (c) After creep, [001] cross section.
(d) After creep, [111] cross section. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
5.4 TEM montage for the initial state prior to creep, foil normal [111]. . . . 67
5.5 TEM montage for 0.1% deformation, foil normal [111], g=(111). . . . . 68
5.6 TEM montage image for 0.1% deformation, foil normal [001]. (a) TEM
montage with horizontal and vertical reference lines. (b) Histogram
showing γ channel width distribution. (c) Histogram showing γ′ cube
edge length distribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
5.7 TEM montage for 0.2% deformation, foil normal [111]. g=(111). . . . . 71
5.8 TEM montage for 0.4% deformation, foil normal [111]. g=(111). . . . . 72
5.9 TEM montage for 1% deformation, foil normal [111]. g=(111). . . . . . 74
5.10 CTEM montage for 5% deformation, foil normal [111]. g=(111). . . . . 75
iii
LIST OF FIGURES
5.11 STEM montage for 5% deformation, foil normal [111]. g=(111). . . . . 76
5.12 Dependence of dislocation densities on creep strain. (a) Overall dislo-
cation density ργ/γ′ . (b) Dislocation density in the γ channels ργ. (c)
Dislocation density in the γ′ particles ργ′ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
5.13 Evolution of planar faults with creep strain. (a) Number density of
planar faults per area nPF/am. (b) Projected area fraction APF . (c)
Intensity parameter IPF . For details see texts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
5.14 TEM micrographs of initial state under different two-beam conditions.
(a) to (k) Bright field images. (l) Kikuchi map indicating tilt positions
and g-vectors. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
5.15 Four STEM images taken as a part of a tilt series for the determination
of Burger’s vector and displacement vectors of planar faults crept at
750 ◦C, 800 MPa, 1%. (a) to (c) STEM BF images. (d) HAADF image. 83
5.16 Anaglyph showing spatial arrangement of defects from Figure 5.15. . . 86
5.17 TEM micrographs taken after 2% strain under different two-beam con-
ditions. (a) Kikuchi map. (b) and (d) to (i) BF images. (c) CDF image. 89
5.18 (a) In-plane faults, STEM micrograph taken after 1% strain under two-
beam condition. (b) Kikuchi map indicating different tilt positions. . . 91
5.19 STEM BF micrographs taken after 1% strain under different two-beam
conditions for in-plane stacking faults and dislocations investigation. (a)
g1 : (111). (b) g2 : (202). (c) g3 : (200). (d) g4 : (111). (e) g5 : (022).
(f) g6 : (111). (g) g7 : (131). (h) g8 : (220). (i) g9 : (311). (j) g10 : (111).
(k) g11 : (113). (l) g12 : (002). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
5.20 An anaglyph under condition of (111) showing in-plane stacking faults
and dislocations. 750 ◦C, 800 MPa, 1% creep strain. . . . . . . . . . . . 93
5.21 An anaglyph under condition of (111) showing in-plane stacking faults
and dislocations. 750 ◦C, 800 MPa, 1% creep strain. . . . . . . . . . . . 94
5.22 HRTEM analysis for stacking faults. (a) Edge-on stacking faults in a
lower magnification. (b) Higher magnification for stacking faults. (c)
FFT. (d) Filtered HRTEM with an inset containing only one plane fil-
tered. (e) Determination of faults nature. (f). Determination for fault
shift. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
6.1 Composite character of SX Ni-base superalloys on two length scales.
Center: Small differences between prior dendritic and interdendritic re-
gions. Left and right: Micro composites with slightly higher (left: ID)
and slightly lower (right: D) γ′-volume fractions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104
iv
LIST OF FIGURES
6.2 Misfit dislocation model. (a) Dislocations in two slip systems. (b) 2D
projection of γ/γ′ model system with misfit dislocations. (c) Reaction of
misfit dislocations to applied load. (d) Annihilation of misfit dislocations
in vertical channels. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
6.3 STEM HAADF image showing microstructure of ERBO/1 at the initial
state, the dashed circles highlight tiny γ phases inside of the γ′ particles.
Courtesy of Dr. A. Parsa, same specimen as in [118]. . . . . . . . . . . 113
6.4 TEM micrographs of dislocation events. (a) Dislocation expanding along
γ -channel in (111) plane of TEM foil - 0.2% strain. (b) Irregularly
located γ′-particles impede dislocation motion - 0.2% strain. (c) γ′-
phase cutting by dislocations - 1% strain. (d) High dislocation densities
in all γ-channels after 5% strain. Central γ′-particle contains planar
faults and dislocations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115
A.1 TEM images showing dislocation movements at 750 ◦C, 800 MPa, 0.2%.
(a) Dislocations gliding in one direction of γ channel. (b) Dislocations
gliding along two sides of one γ′ particle. (c) Dislocations expanding
from one central loop into other direction of γ channels. (d) More dis-
locations sending to the same direction of channel. . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
A.2 Comparison of a pair of plus and minus g-vector analyzing a stacking
fault at 750 ◦C, 800 MPa, 0.2%. (a) BF image under +g, the two outer-
most fringes are both dark. (b) BF image under -g, the two outermost
fringes are both bright. (c) CDF image corresponding to +g, the lower
outermost fringe is bright. (d) CDF image corresponding to -g, the up-
per outermost fringe is bright. (e) WBDF image corresponding to +g,
dislocations show better contrast. (f) WBDF image corresponding to
-g, both the stacking fault and dislocations are highlighted. . . . . . . . 134
A.3 A tilting series for a stacking fault analysis at the condition of 750 ◦C,
800 MPa and 0.2%. (a) BF image at [111]. (b) BF image at [020].
(c) BF image at [111], the stacking fault has been oriented edge-on, as
indicated by the white dashed line. (d) BF image at [220], stacking fault
is invisible. (e) BF image at [202]. (f) BF image at [022]. (g) BF image
at [311], the stacking fault is invisble. (h) BF image at [113]. (i) BF
image at [131]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135
v
LIST OF FIGURES
A.4 Microstructure of 750 ◦C, 800 MPa, 1%, foil normal [001]. (a) CTEM
BF image showing SFs. SFs start from γ′ corners, direction indicated by
white dashed line. (b) CTEM CDF image for SF nature determination.
(c) CTEM BF image showing SFs at a higher magnification. (d) CTEM
WBDF image showing partial dislocation associated with SF. (e) Multi-
beam STEM image showing SFs and lower density of dislocations. (f)
Multi-beam STEM image showing SF and higher density of dislocations. 136
A.5 An anaglyph showing an inclined stacking fault at the condition of
750 ◦C, 800 MPa, 0.1%. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
A.6 Illustration of (111) projection of L12 structure. The symbols have the
same meaning as in Figure 2.10. (a) Projection of (111) plane, with three
〈110〉 and 〈112〉 directions. (b) The top layer is shifted by 1/3 [112] and
a SESF is generated. (c) The top layer is shifted by 1/3 [121] and a
SESF is generated. (d) The top layer is shifted by 1/3 [211] and a SISF
is generated. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138
vi
List of Tables
2.1 Quantitative results of element distribution for ERBO/1C [14]. . . . . . 7
4.1 Chemical composition of ERBO/1C in wt.%. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
4.2 Parameters for thickness measurement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
5.1 Overview of experimental details characterizing the TEM foils investi-
gated in the present work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
5.2 g-vectors and effective visibilities and invisibilities of dislocations from
Figure 5.14. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
5.3 Results from TEM tilt experiments after 1% creep strain for inclined
faults, g-vectors: g (1 to 11), defects: (1-9: dislocations, 10 and 11:
planar faults). Fields highlighted in gray: Figures 5.15(a) to (c). res :
residual contrast, do: double contrast, ? : no determination possible, b:
Burgers vector, R: planar fault displacement vector. . . . . . . . . . . . 85
5.4 g-vectors and effective visibilities and invisibilities of the stacking fault
in Figure 5.17. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
5.5 Results from STEM tilt experiments (Figure 5.19) after 1% creep strain
for in-plane fault with a summary of w value and visibility conditions.
“+” indicates visibility, “-” indicates invisibility and “res” indicates
residual visibility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
vii
Abbreviations
APB anti-phase boundary
APT atom probe tomography
BF bright field
CBED convergent beam electron diffraction
CDF centered dark field
CSF complex stacking fault
CTEM conventional transmission electron microscopy
D dendritic
D-dislocation double stacking fault dislocation
DF dark field
DM creep double minimum creep
EBSD electron back scattered diffraction
ECCI electron channelling contrast imaging
EDM electro discharge machining
EDX energy-dispersive X-ray
EPMA electron probe microanalysis
FCC face-centered cubic
FFT fast Fourier transformation
FS/RH finish to start/ right hand rule
GPA geometrical phase analysis
viii
ABBREVIATIONS
HAADF high angle angular dark field
HR EBSD high angular resolution electron back scatter diffraction
HTLS high temperature and low stress
ID interdendritic
IPM Institute of Physics of Materials
ITIS intermediate temperature and intermediate stress
K-M fringes Kossel-Moellenstedt fringes
L12 ordered FCC structure
LACBED large angle convergent beam electron diffraction
LTHS low temperature and high stress
MMCs metal matrix composites
ODS oxide-dispersion-strengthened
OPS oxide polishing suspension
S-dislocation single stacking fault dislocation
SEM scanning electron microscopy
SESF superlattice extrinsic stacking faults
SISF superlattice intrinsic stacking faults
SSF superlattice stacking faults
STEM scanning transmission electron microscopy
SX single crystal superalloy
TCP topologically close-packed
TEM transmission electron microscopy
WBDF weak beam dark field
WDX wavelength-dispersive spectroscopy
ix
Symbols
Symbol Meaning Unit
γ matrix phase in superalloy -
γ′ precipitate phase in superalloy -
◦C temperature in degree Celsius -
MPa mega Pascal = 106 Pascal, unit for mechanical stress -
δ misfit -
aγ lattice constant of γ phase nm
aγ′ lattice constant of γ′ phase nm
εmin minimum creep rate -
c constant -
σ applied stress MPa
n stress exponent -
Qapp apparent activation energy kJ/mol
R universal gas constant J/(mol·K)
T temperature Kelvin
c′
constant after introduction of back stress -
MAR-M-200 directionally solidified superalloy -
CMSX-6 third generation of superalloy -
CMSX-4 second generation of superalloy -
LEK 94 second generation of superalloy -
x
SYMBOLS
ERBO/1C 2nd generation superalloy used in present work -
s deviation vector from exact Bragg condition -
K0 incident beam -
θc convergent angle mrad
L camera length m
α phase factor -
R displacement vector -
b Burger’s vector -
u line direction of dislocation -
g a vector characterizing two-beam condition -
ξg extinction distance angstrom
w a parameter combing extinction distance and deviation
vector
-
aPF projected area of planar defects µm2
am montage area µm2
IPF an intensity parameter to quantify SF -
APF projected area fraction of SF -∑lH total length of horizontal line µm∑lV total length of vertical line µm∑NH ALL total count of horizontal intersection∑NV ALL total count of vertical intersection
ργ/γ′ average dislocation density m−2
ργ dislocation density of γ phase m−2
ργ′ dislocation density of γ′ phase m−2
fγ volume fraction of γ phase -
fγ′ volume fraction of γ′ phase -
xi
SYMBOLS
tF foil thickness nm
dhkl lattice spacing of hkl plane nm
Dd distance between transmitted and diffracted disk nm
li distance between first and ith fringe 1/nm
λ wave length nm
x distance between the center of transmitted beam and
the deficient line
mm
R distance between the center of transmitted and
diffracted beam
mm
D diffusion coefficient m2/s
X diffusion distance nm
t diffusion time s
µ shear modulus GPa
d diameter of dislocation loop nm
τor Orowan stress MPa
τor H horizontal Orowan stress MPa
τor V vertical Orowan stress MPa
τapp H horizontal applied stress MPa
τmis H horizontal misfit stress MPa
xii
1. Introduction
The present work focuses on the reason for a specific type of creep deformation which
is observed for Ni-base single crystal superalloys (superalloy SX). Superalloy SX are
fascinating materials, because they can withstand mechanical loads at temperatures
up to 1100 ◦C, where other metallic engineering materials are no longer solid. Ni-base
single crystal superalloys are produced in a directional solidification process and have
no high angle grain boundaries. Ni-base single crystal superalloys contain two phases
(i.e., γ- and γ′-phase), where the atoms of the two phases occupy one common lattice.
This will be discussed in detail throughout the present work. Here it is important
to point out that superalloy SX are used to make first stage blades for turbines in
aero engines and power plants. Superalloy SX outperform ceramic high temperature
materials in terms of ductility, which provides the required damage tolerance under
harsh operating conditions.
Research in the last three decades has shown that, creep, the time dependent plas-
tic high temperature deformation of materials, strongly depends on microstructure.
Different elementary deformation mechanisms govern the creep behavior in the high
temperature/low stress (HTLS) and low temperature/high stress (LTHS) regimes. For
the superalloy SX, 750 ◦C is not a high temperature. Throughout the present thesis,
750 ◦C is referred to as the low temperature creep regime. At this temperature, high
mechanical stresses (e.g. 800 MPa) are required, to cause creep deformation within
short laboratory time scale.
In the present work special emphasis is placed on a peculiar type of creep curve shape
that is observed for precisely oriented [001] tensile specimens in the LTHS regime.
It is well-known, that many engineering materials show one creep rate minimum. In
contrast, in the LTHS regime, two creep rate minima can be observed. This peculiar
behavior can be referred to as double minimum creep (DM creep). The first creep rate
minimum occurs at an early stage, after strains as small as 0.1%. Then within a very
1
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
small strain interval, creep rates increase towards an intermediate maximum. From
then on, the strain rates decrease down to a global minimum at a strain of 5%. This
behavior has been first reported more than 20 years ago, and was not explained so far.
The present work uses diffraction contrast transmission electron microscopy (TEM),
to study the evolution of the microstructure of a SX during LTHS creep. The scien-
tific objective of the present work is to provide a microstructural explanation for DM
creep. This work first gives an overview of the technological and scientific background
of the field. Specific research objectives are then briefly summarized. All informa-
tion regarding the material investigated in the present work and the mechanical and
microstructural experiments that were performed are then given. Based on the re-
sults, a sequence of elementary deformation events is proposed which rationalizes DM
creep. The current results are discussed in the light of previous findings reported in
the literature. Directions for further work are finally highlighted.
2
2. Background
2.1 Ni-base single crystal superalloys
Ni-base single crystal superalloys have been widely used in gas turbine blades for jet
engines and power plants due to their superior properties such as high temperature
strength, creep and fatigue resistance, and resistance to oxidation and corrosion at
elevated temperatures [1–4]. The superior high temperature properties of Ni-base sin-
gle crystal superalloys have been significantly improved from the first generation to
the second generation with the addition of 3 wt.% Re [5, 6]. Ni-base single crystal
superalloys are cast materials. As single crystals, they possess several advantages. The
elimination of high angle grain boundaries greatly reduces the risk of crack initiation,
since grain boundaries are the preferred sites for damage accumulation [7]. Moreover,
elements like boron and carbon, which are used to strengthen grain boundaries, are
no longer required. The generation or formation of carbides or borides can then be
avoided [8].
The excellent high temperature properties of SX are closely linked to their microstruc-
ture. It is well-known that there are two phases in Ni-base single crystal superalloys,
i.e., the matrix γ phase and the precipitate γ′ phase. The γ phase has a face-centered
cubic (FCC) structure where Ni and Al atoms are randomly distributed over the lattice
sites, while the γ′ phase is an ordered FCC structure called L12, where all Al atoms sit
at the corners of a cubic cell and all the Ni atoms occupy the face centers. A typical
microstructure is shown in Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1(a) is a scanning transmission electron
microscopy (STEM) image taken in high angle angular dark field (HAADF) mode. The
dark rectangular regions represent the γ′ phase while the bright channels surrounding
them are the γ phase. In Figures 2.1(b) and (c) the crystal structures of γ phase and
γ′ phase are shown. The γ′ phase is coherently embedded in γ matrix. However, there
is a slight difference of the lattice constants of these two phases. The misfit δ is defined
3
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.1: Microstructure and crystal structure of Ni-base single crystal superalloy.(a) STEM HAADF image. (b) FCC structure: γ phase. (c) L12 structure: γ′ phase.
to quantify the difference, as described in the following Equation 2.1:
δ =2 · (aγ + aγ′)
aγ − aγ′(2.1)
where aγ is the lattice constant of the γ phase and aγ′ is the lattice constant of the γ′
phase. For most of the Ni-base single crystal superalloys, their misfit is negative, i.e.,
the lattice constant of the γ′ phase is slightly smaller than that of the γ phase. The
existence of misfit leads to misfit stresses. To relax misfit stress and keep the system
in a low energy state, misfit dislocations are generated to minimize the overall elastic
stress energy. In this respect it is not difficult to understand that misfit dislocations
are present before deformation. In the absence of an external stress, the stress state in
superalloys consists of two elements: the stress introduced by the lattice misfit and the
stress field of dislocations. The presence of misfit dislocations can play an important
role in creep. It is also noteworthy that misfit stress can be as high as 500 MPa [9].
The ordered γ′ phase Ni3Al has received a considerable amount of attention due to its
increase of yield stress with increasing temperatures [10, 11]. This abnormal strength-
ening effect is related to the formation of Kear-Wilsdorf locks, where mobile dislocations
from {111} planes cross slip to the {001} planes and become immobile, thus making
further deformation more difficult.
4
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Another important microstructure aspect is heterogeneity which has large and small
scale. Since Ni-base single crystal superalloys are fabricated by casting, they have a
typical cast microstructure consisting of dendritic (D) and interdendritic (ID) regions.
This has been referred to as large scale heterogeneity. Typical primary dendrites spac-
ings are of the order of 400 µm [2, 3]. The small scale of heterogeneity of SX is related
to the γ/γ′ microstructure, which consists of approximately 70% volume fraction of
γ′ cubes with a typical edge length of 0.5 µm and approximately 30% volume fraction
of γ channels with a typical channel width of 0.1 µm [2, 3, 12]. Different γ′ volume
fractions have great influence on the creep properties of Ni-base single crystal superal-
loys. Murakumo et al. [13] have carried out a series of experiments investigating the
influence of γ′ volume fractions upon creep behavior at different temperature ranges.
They found out that 70% of γ′ volume fraction yields the longest rupture life at 900 ◦C,
while 55% of γ′ volume fraction is the optimum condition for the temperature 1100 ◦C.
In addition, volume fraction of γ′ phase is closely related to the composition [13], as
can be seen in Equation 2.2:
Ci = (1− f)Xi + fX′
i (2.2)
In Equation 2.2, i represents the element (Ni, Al, Co, Ti, etc.), f is the γ′ volume frac-
tion, Ci represents the composition of the alloy, Xi and X′i represent the composition
of γ and γ′ phases, respectively.
It has also been found that element partitioning occurs on both scales. Parsa et al. [14,
15] have conducted detailed element analysis by employing various kinds of techniques,
such as energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping, wavelength-dispersive spectroscopy
- electron probe microanalysis (WDX-EPMA) and atom probe tomography (APT).
From the results of WDX-EPMA in Figure 2.2, it can be seen that after heat treatment
there is more Al in interdendritic than in dendritic regions. In contrast, Re preferably
partitions to the dendritic regions [14, 15]. On the smaller scale, comparing the element
distributions in γ′ particles and γ channels in the same interdendritic regions, as shown
in Figure 2.3, it is clear that the γ′ phase is the preferred place for elements like Al, Ni,
Ti and Ta, while Co, Re, Cr and W show a higher concentration in the γ phase. The
partitioning of elements on the large scale (dendrite and interdendrite) and the small
scale (γ channels and γ′ particles) is compiled in Table 2.1 [14].
5
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.2: EPMA mapping showing large scale elements partitioning (dendritic andinterdendritic regions). (a) Al partitions to interdendritic regions. (b) Re partitions todendritic regions [14, 15].
Figure 2.3: Segregation of elements in ID region to γ′ cubes (first row) and γ channels(second row) [14, 15].
6
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Table 2.1: Quantitative results of element distribution for ERBO/1C [14].
wt.% Al Co Cr Hf Mo Re Ta Ti W Ni
dendrite core 5.6 9.9 6.7 0.1 0.6 4.0 5.6 1.0 8.4 Bal
Interdendritic region 6.3 9.3 6.0 0.1 0.5 1.9 7.1 1.1 5.3 Bal
γ (ID) 0.6 18.4 15.6 - 0.6 11.1 0.8 0.4 10.9 41.6
γ′ (ID) 6.9 6.2 1.9 - 0.1 0.9 5.1 1.2 10.9 68.5
2.2 Creep deformation of metals and alloys
Creep is a plastic time-dependent deformation process under a constant stress or a
constant force at elevated temperature, which is usually higher than half of the melting
temperature of the material [16, 17]. Creep deformation is a process depending on
both temperature and stress. During creep, plastic strain increases with time slowly
but steadily. Typically there are three stages during a creep process, i.e., primary
creep, secondary creep and tertiary creep [16, 17], as can be seen in Figure 2.4 [15, 18].
Figure 2.4(a) is a typical strain-time creep curve where the aforementioned three stages
have been identified as I, II and III. To better illustrate the changes of creep rate with
increasing strain, logarithmic strain rate is plotted as a function of creep strain as is
shown in Figure 2.4(b).
Figure 2.4: Shape of a generic text book creep curve. (a) Strain ε plotted as a functionof time t. (b) Logarithmic strain rate plotted as a function of strain [15, 18].
From logarithmic strain rate vs. strain curves, we can see that the primary stage is
characterized as a stage of decreasing creep rate with increasing strain, while secondary
stage is the period where the creep rate stays almost constant and the minimum strain
rate is established. Most of the creep life of the material is spent in the secondary creep
stage. In the tertiary stage, the creep rate increases dramatically with increasing strain
7
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.5: Stress-rupture plot [17, 19, 20]. (a) Constant temperature. (b) Changingtemperatures.
until rupture occurs. The creep behavior and minimum creep rate have shown strong
dependences on temperature T and stress σ [1, 3, 17, 19, 20]. Figure 2.5(a) [17, 19, 20]
shows the creep rupture response under constant temperature. With a small decrease
of stress, creep lives can be greatly prolonged. Figure 2.5(b) [17, 19, 20] systematically
illustrates the influence of temperature. Under the same stress (horizontal dashed
reference line), an increase of temperature from T1 to T3 significantly shortens creep
life. In other words, to establish a targeted creep life, a lower temperature requires a
much higher stress.
For the influence of temperature and stress on minimum creep rate, it was often re-
ported that [1, 3, 17, 19, 20] the minimum strain rate εmin shows a power law depen-
dence on stress and an Arrhenius type dependence on temperature, as described by
Equation 2.3:
εmin = c · σn · exp
(−Qapp
T
)(2.3)
Here εmin is the minimum strain rate during secondary creep, c is a constant, σ is the
stress, n is the stress exponent, Qapp is the apparent activation energy of creep, R is
the universal gas constant and T is temperature in Kelvin. In practice, the value of n
and Qapp can be obtained by performing creep tests at different stresses for a constant
temperature and at different temperatures for constant stress. Accordingly, the stress
component n can be derived from the Norton plot, i.e., the log-log plot of minimum
creep rate vs. stress [16–22], while the apparent activation energy Qapp can be plotted
from the slope of logarithm of creep rate vs. the inverse of absolute temperature plot
[16–22]. Detailed descriptions can be found in [18].
Creep behavior of pure metals and single phase metals has been well investigated and
8
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.6: Creep curve shapes which are associated with density controlled (type I,alloy type) and obstacle controlled (type II, pure metal type) creep [23, 24].
documented. The well-known Orowan equation has been used to describe these two
types of creep deformation. In pure metals, at the early stage of deformation, there
are no obstacles for dislocations movement except for grain boundaries. The high
mobility of dislocations result in the early high strain rates. With increasing densities of
dislocations and other obstacles like subgrain boundaries, dislocation mobility decreases
and creep rates decrease accordingly. This has been classified as class II type of creep
behavior [23, 24]. For other solid solution alloys, the creep behavior is quite different.
Due to the dominance of solid solution strengthening, creep is controlled by solute drag
forces on dislocations, and in this case, the initial creep rate is very low. The creep
response for this kind of material has been described as alloy type behavior, and alloys
with this type of creep behavior are regarded as class I materials [23, 24]. For class
I materials, the dominating factor is the mobile dislocation density, which increases
during creep. These two controlling mechanisms are systematically summarized in
Figure 2.6 [23, 24].
9
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Particle strengthening materials differ in creep behavior from pure metals and simple
alloys in two aspects. First, the minimum creep rate is obtained from the transition
of primary creep stage to tertiary creep stage due to the absence of a microstructural
steady state. Second, when using Equation 2.3 to represent minimum creep rate, n and
Q values are normally larger compared to simple metals [23, 24]. The introduction of
a back stress term [25, 26], which is subtracted from the applied stress, has been used
to rationalize the high Q and n values, as indicated in Equation 2.4.
εmin = c′ · (σ − σi)n (2.4)
Here c′ is a constant which reflects material properties and temperature dependence, n
is considered to be the true stress exponent, and σi has been considered as a threshold
value below which creep ceases [23].
2.3 Creep deformation of Ni-base single crystal su-
peralloys
As creep deformation is both temperature and stress dependent, the deformation mech-
anism for Ni-base single crystal superalloys differs significantly in different temperature
and stress regimes. Due to the influence of temperature and stress upon creep, it is rea-
sonable to consider three regimes, i.e., the high temperature low stress regime (HTLS),
the intermediate temperature and intermediate stress regime (ITIS) and the low tem-
perature high stress regime (LTHS).
High temperature and low stress regime
In high temperature and low stress regime, the operating temperature is higher than
0.7 of the melting temperature of the material. In this temperature range, there are two
characteristic features associated with the deformation of single crystal superalloys.
The first characteristic feature is rafting or directional coarsening. This event starts
in the early stage of creep. Rafting is a well-known phase instability of the γ/γ′
microstructure. As can be seen in Figure 2.1, for Ni-base single crystal superalloys,
10
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.7: SEM images showing two types of rafting. (a) Rafting perpendicular tothe loading direction. (b) Rafting parallel to the loading direction [28].
initially the γ channel phase is continuously surrounding the cuboidal γ′ particles. In
the case of rafting, γ channels are interrupted and are not continuous any more (see
Figure 2.7). In some extreme cases, isolated γ′ phase regions become continuous while
the continuous γ channels become isolated, which has been referred to as topograph-
ical inversion by some researchers [27]. The morphology of rafting depends on both
misfit and loading direction during deformation. Figure 2.7 shows two scanning elec-
tron microscopy (SEM) images indicating different rafted microstructures at different
conditions in Ni-base single crystal superalloys. For superalloys with a negative misfit,
if uniaxial tensile creep tests in a 〈100〉 direction are conducted, directional rafting has
been observed in the direction perpendicular to the tensile loading direction, Figure
2.7(a). On the contrary, if uniaxial compression tests are performed in this direction,
directional coarsening has been observed parallel to the compression loading direction,
as shown in Figure 2.7(b) [28].
For superalloys with a positive misfit, the direction of rafting is opposite [29, 30].
A series of experiments have been conducted for detailed analyses, and the volume
fraction of γ′ phase has also been found to be an important factor for rafting [29].
Although rafting has been commonly regarded as a phase instability phenomenon,
there are researches which highlight the strengthening effect of raft for superalloys [8].
Since rafting interrupts the continuous path for dislocations movement in γ channels
or at the γ/γ′ interface, it can make dislocation movement more difficult. Ott and
Mughrabi [28] have compared the influence of two types of rafting upon high temper-
11
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
ature fatigue properties. They found out that pre-rafted γ/γ′ microstructures with
rafts parallel to stress direction are beneficial for fatigue properties due to a decreased
rate of fatigue crack propagation [28]. Reed et al.[31] compared the creep behavior at
different temperatures and stresses. They concluded that the decrease of creep rate at
high temperature is associated with rafting, since rafting prevents the glide/climb of
{111}〈110〉 creep dislocations from the γ phase into the γ′ phase. Epishin and Link [32]
further confirmed that glide/climb of a/2〈101〉 interfacial dislocations perpendicular to
the loading direction is activated, and in combination with generated vacancies, the
creep response is greatly influenced.
The second characteristic feature of single crystal Ni-base superalloy crept at high tem-
peratures is the pairwise dislocations cutting into the γ′ phase. As early as in 1957,
Williams [33] proposed that two dislocations are needed to deform an ordered phase.
This type of pairwise dislocation movement has been first observed by Gleiter and
Hornbogen in a Fe-Cr-Al alloy, where two regular a/2〈110〉 dislocations jointly sheared
the γ′ phase, limiting an anti-phase boundary (APB) between the two dislocations
[34–36]. A leading dislocation cuts into the ordered γ′ phase, disturbs the order and
generates an APB. Since an APB has a high energy and is quite unstable, another dis-
location is needed to restore the lattice order and minimize the energy. Kear, Leverant
and co-workers excellently combined diffraction contrast TEM with mechanical and mi-
cromechanical analysis and confirmed experimentally the pairwise cutting mechanism
for the directionally solidified superalloy MAR-M-200 in the high temperature and low
stress regime [37, 38]. This pair-wise cutting has been further confirmed in the second
generation superalloys [39–41]. The two dislocations which limits an APB are referred
to as superpartials, and two superpartials are referred to as one superdislocation [3, 17].
For high temperature and low stress creep regime, dislocation activities have been con-
strained to the γ channels or to the regions near the γ/γ′ interface. With the activation
of more slip systems during creep deformation process, more types of dislocations are
generated from different slip systems. As a result, there will be more possible dislo-
cation reactions, thus forming non-slip dislocations. The generation and interaction
of slip dislocations lead to the formation of dislocation networks. It should also be
highlighted that Eggeler and Dlouhy [41] have explicitly explained and confirmed the
formation of 〈010〉 dislocations in CMSX-6 at high temperature and low stress creep,
which form by the reaction of two 60◦ deposited channel dislocations. Dislocation net-
works strengthen the material by making the dislocation movement more difficult, but
at the same time it provides more sources of superdislocations for pairwise cutting into
the γ′ particles.
12
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Anisotropic properties for single crystal superalloys are also an important aspect. For
example, Agudo et al.[42] have compared the creep properties of LEK 94 for [001] and
[110] orientations at a high temperature (1293 K) and a low stress (160 MPa). It was
found that, in the early stage of creep, [001] oriented samples show higher minimum
creep rates than [110] oriented samples, due to the activation of more slip systems. In
contrast, at later creep stage, [110] oriented samples creep faster because rafting is less
pronounced and pairwise cutting is easier.
13
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Intermediate temperature and intermediate stress
regime
Intermediate temperature creep is the creep deformation of superalloys which occurs
in a temperature range between 0.6 and 0.7 of the melting temperature. Stresses are
higher at intermediate temperatures than in the high temperature range, but not as
high as in the low temperature range. Therefore, dislocation activities are still mostly
confined to the γ channels. During creep in this regime, the morphology of the γ′
phase does not change dramatically [43]. Creep behavior at this temperature regime
has been reported to be sensitive to both size and shape of the γ′ phase [43, 44].
The influence of specific elements (heavy refractory elements: e.g., Ru, W) upon creep
responses has also been studied. Hobbs et al. [45] investigated the influence of ruthe-
nium on creep behavior of Ni-base single crystal superalloy, and found out ruthenium
has a significant strengthening effect due to the fact that it effectively reduces the
stacking fault energy of the γ matrix phase. On the other hand, Murakami et al. [43]
carried out some research to figure out the influence of Co on anisotropy properties
of Ni-base single crystal superalloys at 800 ◦C and 735 MPa. Surprisingly, it has been
concluded that Co is not essential in improving creep rupture properties of Ni-base
single crystal superalloys, and {111}〈112〉 slip systems have been operative during the
first stage of creep. Although it is possible for planar faults cutting into γ′ particles,
it is not commonly reported due to the intermediate stress. Furthermore, incubation
period has been commonly observed and studied in detail at intermediate temperature
range for 〈001〉 CMSX-3 superalloy [8, 9, 46]. One characteristic feather of this temper-
ature range is the observation of dislocation morphology during the incubation period.
It has been found out that during the incubation period and also the early stage of
creep, dislocations prefer to glide in horizontal channels, which are perpendicular to the
loading axis [8]. It is due to the fact that resolved shear stress in horizontal channels
are much higher than the stress in vertical channels [8].
Overall, under the condition of intermediate temperatures and stresses, the deforma-
tion mechanism could be much more complex compared to high temperature or low
temperature creep.
14
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Low temperature and high stress regime
At low temperature (when the temperature is lower than 0.6 of the melting tempera-
ture) and high stress regime, the deformation mechanism is significantly different com-
pared to high temperature and low stress regime. Low temperature regime normally
undergoes a considerable amount of primary creep strain, and no significant rafting
has been observed. It has been widely accepted that the dominative operating slip
systems at low temperature and high stress is {111}〈112〉 at primary creep for Ni-base
single crystal superalloys, e.g. [47–53]. According to Kear and Leverant [38, 47, 48],
there are three possible γ′ cutting mechanisms involving low energy stacking faults, as
shown in Figure 2.8. The Burger’s vectors are given following Thompson’s notation,
and dislocations involving superlattice extrinsic stacking faults (SESF) are differenti-
ated from dislocations involving superlattice intrinsic stacking faults (SISF) by putting
an over-bar. It can be seen that cutting of the γ′ particles can involve a net vector
of a〈112〉 and generates both SISF and SESF, as shown in Figure 2.8(a), or it can be
associated with a net vector of a〈110〉, as displayed in Figures 2.8(b) and (c). Com-
bined with a detailed TEM analysis, Kear and Leverant proposed a type of a〈112〉cutting, as can be seen in Figure 2.9. In fact, they are the first ones who exclusively
proposed a cutting model and proved with detailed TEM analyses. In Figure 2.9(a),
there are two groups of dislocations and stacking faults, marked as I and II under a
g-condition of (200). The schematic drawing for the cutting mechanism description is
shown in Figure 2.9(b), corresponding to group I dislocations and stacking faults. It
is similar to a〈112〉 cutting, as displayed in Figure 2.8(a). According to the analysis in
[47], dislocation 1 has a Burger’s vector of 1/3[112] and dislocation 2 has a Burger’s
vector of 1/6[112]. Dislocation 3 has a Burger’s vector of 1/6[112] and dislocation 4 has
a Burger’s vector of 1/3[112]. Written in Thompson’s notation, the cutting mechanism
can be summarized in the following two Equations 2.5 and 2.6:
3αB −→ 2αB + SISF + αB (2.5)
3αB −→ 2αB + SESF + αB (2.6)
The partial dislocations 3αB arrive at the γ/γ′ interface and dissociate into 2αB along
with the generation of a SISF and one αB left at the interface, as indicated in Equation
2.5. A second set of 3αB will arrive at the interface for further deformation to occur.
In the similar sense, 3αB will dissociate into 2αB and leave one αB at the interface,
with the generation of a SESF. It is then not possible to avoid the generation of
15
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.8: Three possible cutting mechanisms into the γ′ particles. (a) a〈112〉 cutting,with generation of SISF and SESF. (b) a〈110〉 cutting with SISF. (c) a〈110〉 cuttingwith SESF [47].
Figure 2.9: Detailed analysis of γ′ cutting mechanism. (a) A TEM image indicatingstacking fault cutting mechanism. (b) Proposed model corresponding to the TEMimage [47].
16
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
high energy anti-phase boundary between the two 1/6[112] dislocations. It has been
estimated that the APB energy in Ni3Al can be as high as 144±20 mJ/m2 and 102±11
mJ/m2 for {111} and {100} planes, respectively, while for a SISF the energy is as
low as 12 mJ/m2 [54]. However, due to the multi-element environment of Ni-base
single crystal superalloy, it is plausible that during the deformation process, there is
diffusion of certain element to planar defects and changes the stacking fault energy
correspondingly [50]. Viswanathan et al. [55] tried out high resolution EDX mapping
to detect elemental segregation around planar defects. They found out that more Co
and Cr segregate to the fault compared to the elements Ni and Al. It is still not
clear what kind of element and how element partitioning influence planar fault energy.
More work is required to figure out whether there are more heavy elements partitioned
to planar defects and the corresponding consequences for the change of planar fault
energy.
Apart from the activation of {111}〈112〉 slip systems, for low temperature and high
stress regime, lattice rotation has also been observed and this leads to changes of
the Schmidt factor. Lattice rotation phenomenon has been studied and confirmed by
several researchers [37, 38, 56]. Kear et al. [37, 38, 56] have measured lattice rotation
and compared the results with the creep behavior. It is concluded that crystal lattice
tends to rotate towards to [112], where the Schmidt factor is highest. Lattice rotation
can further convince activation of {111}〈112〉 slip system, since in single crystals lattice
rotates towards slip direction [37, 38, 56]. However, there are also researchers who
found out that the lattice rotation is not necessary for strain accumulation [49]. In this
case, there is sufficient source of 〈110〉 type of dislocations for the generation of 〈112〉dislocations, but it is not enough to prevent the cutting of 〈112〉 type.
Anisotropy at low temperature and high stress regime for Ni-base single crystal superal-
loy has been quite significant. In fact, it has been more pronounced at low temperature
than at high temperature. Sass et al.[57] compared anisotropic creep properties of a
second generation CMSX-4 superalloy containing 3% Re. They found out that at a
lower temperature, even a small misorientation from [001] and [011] significantly affects
the primary creep behavior. While at a higher temperature as in 1253 K, the degree of
anisotropy is not so pronounced. The reason for different anisotropy behavior at dif-
ferent temperatures is due to the operating mechanisms changing from heterogeneous
{111}〈112〉 slip to a more homogeneous {111}〈110〉 slip. Meanwhile, with a slight de-
viation from [001] orientation, it is possible to change from a single slip orientation to a
duplex-slip orientation [57]. For a single slip orientation, creep life is much shorter than
in a duplex-slip orientation due to a lack of work hardening. Knowles et al. [52, 58]
concluded that the low temperature anisotropy is closely related to the shear stress
17
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
activating {111}〈112〉 slip systems. By slightly changing the orientation, the Schmidt
factor changes dramatically and correspondingly changes the shear stress.
2.4 Miniature tensile creep testing
Miniature tensile creep tests have been conducted to investigate creep properties of Ni-
base single crystal superalloys. Compared to standard-sized creep specimens, miniature
creep specimens have two advantages. First, with miniature specimens it is easier to ori-
ent the specimen precisely. As it is clear that single crystal superalloys show anisotropic
properties, more precise orientations yield more reproducible creep responses. Secondly,
more creep specimens can be obtained from the same amount of oriented superalloy
plates.
Regarding the accuracy of creep tests with miniature specimens, from the research work
of Malzer [59], who compares the creep behavior of miniature specimen and standard
creep specimen (Figure 3 in [59]), it can be seen that the creep curves from miniature
specimens only deviates slightly from a standard size specimen starting from a strain of
0.2% on. Meanwhile, even the decrease of creep rate can be more clearly observed from
the miniature specimen. All the creep tests of the present work have been conducted
using miniature specimens. It should also be noticed that polycrystalline materials are
less suitable for miniature creep specimen testing since the grain sizes can be of the
order of the diameter of the miniature creep specimen, which can lead to considerable
scatter when comparing different specimens [60].
In the present work, back scattered Laue method is used for a precise orientation of
miniature creep specimens. The selected orientation is fixed by a three-axis goniometer.
The goniometer is also attached to an electro discharge machining (EDM) for miniature
specimen cutting. More details about miniature specimens can be found in chapter
Materials and Experiment of the present work.
18
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
2.5 Transmission electron microscopy of defects in
Ni-base single crystal superalloys
To better understand and interpret creep properties and mechanisms of Ni-base sin-
gle crystal superalloys, transmission electron microscopy has been employed for mi-
crostructure investigations. When the specimen is thin enough, electrons can transmit
the specimen and reach a screen where an image is formed. The wave-particle duality
properties allow to investigate phases and defects in the material from the aspect of
wave function by TEM. The TEM image is a result of the interaction of the electron
beam with the microstructural elements in the thin foil. For example, if foil regions are
oriented such that they can produce Bragg diffraction, then the beam loses intensity
and this region appears dark on the screen (diffraction contrast). However, crystalline
regions can also produce contrast because the atoms and electrons of the solid interact
with the electron beam and affect the wave function [61–63]. Before this is further
discussed, it is important to take a look at the crystal defects which can be present in
the crystalline planes of a Ni-base superalloy, especially the defects in the ordered γ′
phase and the corresponding contrast mechanism introduced by defects in TEM.
Line defects
Dislocations are one of the most common crystal defects which are characterized by a
Burger’s vector b and a line direction u. The “finish start/ right hand (FS/RH) rule”
has been employed to determine the direction of the Burger’s vector and of the sense
of the dislocation line. The direction of the Burger’s vector is determined from the
finish to start (FS) point of the Burger’s circuit. The positive line sense of a Burger’s
vector is associated with a clockwise circuit using the right hand rule [64–66]. From the
relationship of Burger’s vector direction and dislocation line direction, two simple types
of dislocations can be classified, i.e., edge and screw dislocations. If the dislocation
line is perpendicular to the Burger’s vector, this type of dislocation is called an edge
dislocation [64–66]. Edge dislocations are associated with an extra half plane, and they
can only slip in specific glide planes. However, edge dislocations can also climb when the
temperature is high and diffusion is fast. When the dislocation line direction is parallel
to the Burger’s vector, this is a screw dislocation. Screw dislocations are not confined
to one slip plane, instead, they can cross slip to another slip plane, which contains
the Burger’s vector [64–66]. For Ni-base single crystal superalloys, dislocations have
19
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
been commonly observed in the γ phase and at the γ/γ′ interfaces. The dislocations
have been mainly a/2〈110〉 type, as for FCC structures. Under certain deformation
conditions, dislocations can also be observed cutting into γ′ particles. Pairwise cutting
of the γ′ phase is a well-known process [37–41]. At low temperatures cutting process
produce varies planar faults which are limited by dislocation ribbons. There are also
mixed dislocations. For example, when a a/2〈110〉 type of dislocation enters a γ channel
in a {111} glide plane, a leading screw segment deposits 60◦ dislocation segments close
to the γ/γ′ interface. 60◦ dislocations have 2/3 edge and 1/3 screw character.
Planar defects
Planar defects play an important role in Ni-base single crystal superalloys, especially in
the ordered γ′ phase. In the present work, planar faults in the γ′ particles are focused.
The crystallographic projection of a (111) plane is used to indicate the ordered structure
of the γ′ phase, as shown in Figure 2.10 (adapted and modified from [3]). Figure 2.10
represents a 〈111〉 projection of three layers of atomic planes of the L12 lattice. The
empty and full circles represent Ni and Al atoms in the upper layer. Empty and full
squares represent Ni and Al atoms in the middle layer. And the bottom layers consist
of empty (Ni) and full (Al-atoms) triangles. Figure 2.10 shows three 〈110〉 and 〈112〉directions on the (111) plane.
Anti-phase boundary (APB)
An anti-phase boundary is a defect in an ordered alloy and is generated due to the
disturbance of the ordered structure. In Ni-base single crystal superalloys, an APB
can be created by pair-wise cutting of dislocations into the γ′ phase. As can be seen in
Figure 2.11, if the top layer (the circles) is shifted by a/2[101], an anti-phase boundary
is formed, as indicated in the dashed rectangular area, because of the formation of
forbidden bonds (like Al-Al or Ni-Ni bonds). This corresponds to the formation of a
planar defect which is referred to as anti-phase boundary and costs energy. It should
be noticed that the example illustrated here is the formation of an APB in the {111}plane of a L12 lattice. An APB can also be formed in {001} planes and the APB energy
in {111} and {001} planes are not the same.
20
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.10: Illustration of {111} projection of L12 structure, Al atoms are in grayand Ni atoms are in white. Circles represent atoms at the top layer, while rectanglesand triangles represent middle and bottom layers respectively. Three 〈110〉 and 〈112〉directions are indicated, adapted and modified from [3].
21
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.11: Illustration of an APB generation due to the top layer shear of vectorbAPB=a/2[101], two dashed rectangles indicates the forbidden bond of Al-Al, adaptedfrom [3].
22
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.12: Illustration of a SISF generation due to top layer shear of vectorbSISF=a/3[211], the top layer sits directly on top of the bottom layer [3]. The cir-cles have the same meaning as in Fig 2.10.
Superlattice stacking fault (SSF)
Superlattice stacking faults (SSF) are planar defects in the ordered γ′ phase. They
correspond to the case when the normal stacking sequence is changed. According to
the change, i.e., whether there is a new inserted layer or a missing layer, the type
of superlattice stacking faults can be classified as superlattice extrinsic and intrinsic
stacking faults (SESF and SISF) [62–66]. Superlattice stacking faults can be generated
by a/3〈112〉 shear vector. Figure 2.12 shows one example of SISF generation by a shear
vector of a/3[211]. In Figure 2.12, the top layer is sheared by a vector of a/3[211], the
direction is indicated by the arrow. The result of the shearing is that the top layer
atoms sit directly on top of the bottom layer, which has a similar effect as a layer
missing. With this kind of shearing a superlattice intrinsic stacking fault is formed.
23
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.13: Illustration of a SESF generation due to top layer shear of vectorbSESF=a/3 [211]. A new top layer has generated. The symbols have the same meaningas in Fig 2.10.
In the same manner, shearing of a/3〈112〉 can also generate superlattice extrinsic stack-
ing faults. It can be better shown when the projected plane is (111), as indicated in
Figure 2.13. In this case, the top layer is sheared by a/3[211] and a new top layer
formed on the middle layer and generates a SESF.
If the shearing vector is a/6〈112〉, not only the stacking sequence is disturbed, but also
the environment of neighboring atoms. As can be seen in Figure 2.14, the top layer is
sheared by a dislocation with a Burger’s vector of a/6[112]. The corresponding result is
that the top layer atoms sit directly on top of the bottom layer. In addition, forbidden
bonds form, as highlighted by dashed rectangles. The combination of a SISF and an
APB is called a complex stacking fault (CSF). It is not difficult to understand that a
CSF has a higher energy as compared to a single SISF or an APB.
24
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.14: Illustration of a CSF generation due to top layer shear of vectorbCSF=a/6[112], the top layer sits directly on top of the bottom layer and forbiddenbonds form. The symbols have the same meaning as in Fig 2.10, adapted from [3].
25
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.15: Illustration of stacking sequence of intrinsic and extrinsic stacking faultswith regard to dislocations [66]. (a) S-fault. (b) D-fault.
Intrinsic and extrinsic stacking faults have also been regarded as single stacking faults
and double stacking faults, as can be seen in Figure 2.15 [66]. These two situations were
firstly described by Weertman in the case of Frank sessile dislocations. By removal of
one layer of atoms, an intrinsic stacking fault is generated since the stacking sequence
has changed from normal FCC stacking sequence ABCABC to ABC|BC (| indicates the
missing layer), as shown in Figure 2.15(a), along with two bonding edge-dislocations
of opposite signs.
On the other hand, inserting a layer of atoms can also generate an extrinsic stacking
fault with two edge dislocations of opposite signs and stacking faults in between. At-
tention should be paid that in this case, there are two stacking faults generated, since
the stacking sequence is ABCBABC. To differentiate dislocations attached to these
two types of stacking faults, single stacking fault dislocations are called S-dislocations
and double stacking faults dislocations are called D-dislocations [66]. In this respect,
it is not difficult to imagine that the energy for a SESF should be slightly higher than
a SISF.
Contrast mechanism of defects
Since TEM has been widely employed for investigation and analysis of defects, it is
important to understand the contrast mechanism introduced by defects in TEM. The
principle contrast mechanism in TEM is diffraction contrast, where an objective aper-
ture is used to select either the transmitted or the diffracted beam [61], as shown in
Figure 2.16. Figure 2.16 shows a TEM bright field (BF) mode, where the transmitted
beam passes through the objective aperture. According to the selection of the beam, in
conventional TEM mode (when the beam is parallel), there are bright field mode, dark
26
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
field (DF) mode, centered dark field (CDF) mode and weak beam dark field (WBDF)
mode. These four modes can be better explained and differentiated with the intro-
duction of a two-beam condition, as can be seen in Figure 2.17 [61–63]. A two-beam
condition is the situation when TEM specimen is tilted in such a way that there are
only two beams: one transmitted beam and one diffracted beam.
An exact two-beam condition is shown in Figure 2.17(a). On the left part of Figure
2.17(a), both transmitted and diffracted beam are exactly on the Ewald sphere. The
corresponding g-vector is pointing from the transmitted to the diffracted beam. On
the right side of Figure 2.17(a), this two-beam condition is illustrated together with
a pair of corresponding Kikuchi lines. T and D represent spots which correspond
to the transmitted and diffracted beams, respectively. An exact two-beam condition
represents a case where the Kikuchi lines pass through the center of the spots associated
with the transmitted and the diffracted beams. However, in practice, the exact two-
beam condition is not established. Instead, one establishes a certain deviation from the
exact two-beam condition. To quantify this deviation from exact two-beam condition, a
deviation parameter s is used. Negative and positive s have been illustrated in Figures
2.17(b) and (c) respectively. A negative s indicates that the diffracted beam is outside
of Ewald sphere or the diffraction patterns are on the right side of the corresponding
Kikuchi lines. On the contrary, a positive s means the diffracted beam is inside of Ewald
sphere or the diffraction patterns are on the left side of the corresponding Kikuchi lines.
An exact two-beam condition is not ideal to image dislocations. Experimentally, pos-
itive deviation vector s is usually used during investigation due to a better contrast
[61–63]. This can be explained by the intensity distribution with different s values in
Figure 2.18 [62]. It can be clearly seen that with an increase of s value, the diffracted
beam intensity decreases and a better contrast can be obtained.
A schematic drawing is presented in Figure 2.19 for demonstration of different modes
in TEM under two-beam conditions. A white circle indicates the transmitted beam,
marked as “0”, and the gray circles indicate diffracted beams, marked as “g”, “2g”
etc., as first and second diffracted beams. The dashed circle indicates the position of
the objective aperture for the selection of a beam. As described previously, a two-
beam condition implies the situation where only the transmitted beam “0” and the
first diffracted beam “g” are used for diffraction contrast. A BF mode is obtained
when the transmitted beam is selected, as shown in Figure 2.19(a). If the objective
aperture is moved to select the first diffracted beam g, a DF mode is obtained. The
direction of the operating g-vector remains the same for both BF and DF modes, i.e.,
pointing from transmitted beam to diffracted beam. If the objective aperture is kept
27
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.16: Schematic drawing showing the generation of diffraction contrast [61].
28
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.17: Schematic drawing showing two-beam conditions with different s value.(a) Exact two-beam condition, s =0. (b) Positive s. (c) Negative s [61, 62].
29
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.18: Illustration of s value and intensity distribution with s value [62].
at the transmitted beam position as in the BF mode in Figure 2.19(a), however, -g
beam is tilted away to the transmitted beam position while the transmitted beam has
been tilted to the original g beam position. As a result, a centered dark field mode is
obtained. Compared to the normal dark field image, when the objective aperture is
moved, the g-vector direction is opposite to that in the bright field mode. In practice, a
CDF image can be obtained more efficiently since BF and CDF images can be switched
back and forth by simply pressing one button on the TEM console. Moreover, the
normal dark field (DF) image suffered from a slight loss of contrast compared with
CDF [62, 63].
Tilting g beam to the transmitted beam position, one can also establish weak beam
dark field mode. In this case, diffracted beam 3g is activated. WBDF has also been
called g-3g method. When the diffraction contrast is associated with 3g, we obtain a
weak beam dark filed image. By WBDF, crystal defects can be visible with a high res-
olution of diffraction contrast, since the defects contrast is only introduced by the core
of defects [62]. However, long exposure time is usually required. The WBDF technique
has been widely used for the investigation and analysis of dislocation reactions, partial
dislocations and planar defects. Stacking fault energies can be calculated using WBDF
images which allow to assess the distance of two partial dislocations which limit the
SFs [67].
These four modes have been widely used in conventional transmission electron mi-
croscopy (CTEM). A better contrast of microstructure can be obtained in STEM mode
when the specimen is not thin enough for CTEM investigation or TEM thin foil is bent,
which is very often the case in practice.
30
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.19: Illustration of different modes in conventional TEM. (a) BF. (b) DF. (c)CDF. (d) WBDF.
31
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.20: Comparison between CTEM and STEM modes [68].
STEM outperforms CTEM in certain aspects due to the convergent beam condition,
as can be seen in Figure 2.20 [68]. Figure 2.20(a) illustrates the normal CTEM mode.
K0 represents the incident beam and the dashed line represents the Ewald sphere. The
full black circles are interactions between incident beam and lattice planes which are
in Bragg condition. When the TEM foil is slightly bent, the full gray diffraction spot
in Figure 2.20(a) will not be in Bragg condition, and the contrast cannot be properly
displayed. On the contrary, in STEM mode, the incident beam is convergent and
can be considered as a cone area defined by an angle 2α and limited by two incident
beams K01 and K02 as shown in Figure 2.20(b). In this case, many Ewald spheres
are associated with the range limited by ES1STEM and ES2STEM . The advantage of
convergent beam is that, in this case, the full gray circle which is not in Bragg condition
in CTEM mode is now in contrast in STEM mode. In other words, better contrast and
more information can be obtained in STEM mode, even when the TEM foil is slightly
bent.
However, STEM mode also has certain disadvantages, especially when it comes to a
large tilt angle, since it will be difficult to get one appropriate focus value for the whole
tilted scanning area. As suggested by Agudo [68], dynamic focus must be applied to
improve the image quality in STEM mode.
Figure 2.21 illustrates the configuration of the STEM mode [69]. The convergence
angle is θC . The distance between the sample and the detector is called camera length,
which is an important parameter for the image contrast.
As can be seen in Figure 2.21, with the change of camera length L, the divergent angle
is also affected. When L is too small, there will be contributions of the diffracted
beam to BF signal [69]. On the other hand, if L is too large, the transmitted signal
will contribute to the ADF image. An adequate choice of camera length is required to
32
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.21: Illustration of STEM mode configuration [69].
obtain optimum contrast.
Apart from a two-beam condition, in STEM mode, a multi-beam condition is also
applicable by orienting the specimen to a specific zone axis. This kind of contrast
arises by averaging BF and ADF imaging intensities [69]. In principle, all the defects
should exhibit contrast except for those with displacement vectors parallel to the zone
axis.
Stereo TEM
Stereo TEM can be applied in both CTEM and STEM modes [68–70]. For Ni-base
single crystal superalloys, stereo TEM has been widely used for determination of the
position and distribution of dislocations and planar defects and also to obtain a spatial
impression of the cuboidal shape of γ′ phase. The basic principle for the stereo tech-
nique is to take two individual images under the same operating g-conditions [68, 70]
within a certain angular distance. A typical angle of 10 to 15◦ is used for adjustment of
the two g-conditions, as it is the suitable angle range for human eyes to get the stereo
impression. Normally these two conducting g-vectors are located on both sides of a
33
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.22: Two g-conditions for stereo images. (a) Before rotation. (b) After rota-tion.
zone axis, as can be seen in Figure 2.22(a). The two two-beam conditions g1 and g2 are
located at both sides of the [112] pole. For stereo effect observation, the corresponding
g-vectors should be rotated in a way such that they are parallel to the observer, as can
be seen in Figure 2.22(b). The image which rotated clock-wise from the zone is viewed
by the left eye (image taken under g2), while the one rotated anti-clockwise is viewed
by the right eye (image taken under g1) [68, 70]. An anaglyph can then be obtained
from these two images. Each gray scale image is subdivided into its underlying red
and cyan colored image. Then one red image for one gray scale stereo micrograph is
viewed together with the one cyan image for the other gray scale stereo micrograph
using colored glasses. Stereo impression can be obtained when the anaglyph is viewed
with colored glasses. It has been found out that the STEM mode gives a better stereo
impression than the CTEM mode due to the fact that STEM mode is not so sensitive
to the very strong contrast associated with two-beam conditions [68]. More detailed
information can be found in [68, 70].
Electron microscopy uses wave functions to describe diffraction contrast associated
with the presence of defects in crystals. Although there are kinematical and dynamical
theories for contrast mechanisms, the additional phase factor introduced by defects is
α, as shown in the following Equation 2.7 [61–63]:
α = 2π · g ·R (2.7)
In Equation 2.7, g is the two-beam diffraction condition and R is displacement vector.
The phase factor is used for the explanation of defect contrasts.
34
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.23: STEM images showing dislocations in Ni-base single crystal superalloyCMSX-4 type. (a) BF image. (b) HAADF image.
Contrast of dislocations
In the bright field mode of a TEM, dislocations normally appear as dark lines. An
example is shown in Figure 2.23(a), where dislocations in Ni-base single crystal su-
peralloys have been observed at the interface. One can also observe different types of
contrasts, i.e., dislocations appear as white lines in HAADF images, as shown in Figure
2.23(b).
The contrast of dislocations can be understood as follows:
(1) When the Burger’s vector of a dislocation is parallel to the reflecting planes, the
location of the atoms in the reflecting lattice planes are only slightly disturbed by
dislocations. The reflecting angle between incident beam and reflecting planes is the
same as the angle between incident beam and the Burger’s vector of dislocations.
There is no contrast difference between regions with and without dislocations. This
corresponds to a situation where dislocations are effectively invisible. However, when
the Burger’s vector of a dislocation is not parallel to the reflecting planes, the reflecting
planes have a positive deviation vector and thus the diffracted intensity decreases and
the image in BF mode, where no dislocation is contained, appear bright.
(2) When the electron beam approaches the dislocation, the deviation vector s is closer
to zero, and the diffracted beam intensity reaches a maximum value. In this case,
35
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.24: Illustration of dislocation contrast. (a) When dislocation is parallel toreflecting planes. (b) When dislocation is not parallel to reflecting planes [62].
dislocations appear as dark lines in BF images.
The two types of contrasts discussed in this section can be seen in Figure 2.24. Figure
2.24(a) represents a case where the Burger’s vector is parallel to the reflecting planes
and there is no change of reflecting angles for dislocations and reflecting planes. Figure
2.24(b), on the other hand, shows a situation where the Burger’s vector of a dislocation
and reflecting planes are not parallel [62]. The contrast differences result from the
change of reflecting angle and the corresponding change of the deviation vector s.
Contrast of stacking faults
From the wave function of stacking faults, the phase factor introduced by stacking
faults is 2π, and therefore, stacking faults have been referred to as 2π defects [61–63].
Using the dynamic theory, Hashimoto et al. [61, 71] have calculated the intensity
profile for stacking faults for the condition where the phase angle is 2/3π and a foil
thickness is 7.25ξg ( ξg: the extinction distance), as can be seen in Figure 2.25. The
solid line represents the intensity profile in a bright field image while the dashed line
represents the dark field case. It can be concluded that the contrast at the top and
the bottom side of the stacking fault in BF is the same, i.e., are symmetric. In DF,
the contrasts of the two outermost fringes of stacking faults are opposite to each other,
which referred to as asymmetric [61–63]. Combined with g-vectors obtained from BF
and DF images, the way in which stacking faults are inclined can be obtained, i.e., one
can determine the top and the bottom side of stacking faults. The contrast peaks also
explain why stacking faults have black and bright fringe contrasts. This 2π feature of
stacking faults provide the basis for further detailed analysis.
36
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.25: Computed stacking fault intensity image profile for α =+2π/3 withanomalous absorption [61, 71].
Contrast of APB
In the case of an APB, the phase factor is π rather than 2π, which makes an APB
a special type of planar defect. Since APBs are only observed in ordered phases, the
contrast of an APB can only be clearly distinguished when using superlattice diffraction
induced from ordered phase. Due to the high energy of an APB, the width of an
APB tends to be relatively small. To make sure the defect is APB, both matrix and
superlattice diffraction conditions have to be employed and compared. An example is
shown in the section Analysis of APB.
Analysis of defects
Analysis of perfect dislocations
For determination of Burger’s vector of perfect dislocations, two effective invisibility
conditions are needed. In other words, there should be two different two-beam con-
ditions (two different g-vectors) where dislocations are out of contrast. Applying the
effective invisibility criterion g ·b = 0, Burger’s vector b can be calculated. To be fully
correct, the line direction of a dislocation u has to be taken into consideration, because
the full invisibility condition is g · b × u = 0 and not single g · b = 0. However, it is
37
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
not always possible to account for u in practice. Nevertheless, it has been often shown
that effective invisibility conditions can be used to obtain Burger’s vectors of perfect
dislocations. More detailed examples will be shown in the result section (see section
5.4).
Analysis of partial dislocations
In the case of partial dislocations, the invisibility conditions are modified. The in-
visibility condition g · b = 0 is still applicable. However, there are other conditions
which yield invisibilities. For example, g · b = ±1/3 has also been reported as an
effective invisibility condition for partial dislocations [61, 72]. Moreover, according to
the value of w, (a parameter combining extinction distance and deviation vector from
exact two-beam condition: w = ξg · s), g ·b = −2/3 can yield the vanish of dislocation
contrast when w has a larger value than 1 [61, 72]. Kear and Oblak [47] have extended
the invisibility criterion to g · b = +4/3, which will yield the same contrast result as
g · b = −2/3. More attention must therefore be paid for the analysis of the contrast
of partial dislocations.
High resolution TEM has been a common technique for the analyses of dislocations
as well, when dislocations are oriented edge-on. Back to the definition of dislocations
using Burger’s circuit, it is possible to set up a Burger’s circuit around the dislocation
core and simply derive the Burger’s vector from a Burger’s circuit in the high resolution
image. A state-of-art way for analysis of high resolution image is to use geometrical
phase analysis (GPA) which is a plug-in in Gatan software and is based on geometric
phase algorithms. However, the HRTEM technique requires very thin foils (e.g., 50
nm) while for the anaglyph of collective dislocations it is necessary to have thick foils
which contain sufficient dislocations (e.g., thicker than 150 nm).
Analysis of stacking faults
For the analysis of stacking faults, both bright field and dark field images are needed
in order to confirm their nature. By comparing BF and DF images, three questions
can be addressed:
(1) What is the nature of the stacking fault: intrinsic or extrinsic?
38
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.26: TEM images showing contrast of stacking fault. (a) BF image. (b) CDFimage.
(2) Where is the top of the stacking fault intersecting the TEM foil?
(3) What is the sign of the displacement vector of the stacking fault: positive or
negative?
The analysis of stacking faults is closely related to the type of g-vector used for the
image. To better illustrate the analysis procedure, an example is given in Figure 2.26.
Figure 2.26(a) is a BF image and Figure 2.26(b) is a CDF image under g-vector of
〈111〉 type. It is noteworthy that the directions of the g-vector in BF and CDF images
are opposite. The contrast of the stacking fault F1 is symmetric in BF while in CDF
it is asymmetric. This contrast difference confirms the nature of a stacking fault. The
outermost fringes for stacking fault F1 are both dark. This indicates that the scalar
product between g-vector used in BF and the fault vector R is negative. Comparing to
the CDF image in Figure 2.26(b), it can be seen that the outermost fringes are black
and bright. Since it is a CDF image, the direction of the operating g-vector is opposite
to the BF image. The fringe, where the contrast is different in BF and CDF image, is
the top of the stacking fault (as highlighted by the arrow pointing to the left in both
BF and CDF images). The top of the SF fringe is where the stacking faults interact
with the upper part of the TEM foil.
The question whether the stacking fault is intrinsic or extrinsic can be answered from
the CDF image. The basic procedure is to put the g-vector of CDF in the center
of the stacking fault, as indicated by the dashed arrow in the middle of the stacking
39
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.27: Systematic flow chart showing the criterion for SF nature determination[61–63].
fault, and determine whether the g-vector points away or towards the outermost bright
fringe of the stacking fault. Based on the different types of g-vectors used for DF (CDF)
images, the conclusion will be different. A summary of the determination of stacking
faults nature from g-vectors has been shown in Figure 2.27 [61–63]. In the example in
Figure 2.26, we can see that the g-vector used in CDF is (111). It points towards the
bright fringe of the stacking fault F1. Using the criterion from Figure 2.27, it can be
concluded that F1 is a superlattice extrinsic stacking fault.
Analysis of APB
As a specific kind of planar defects, the contrast of the APB can be verified by compar-
ison of images from the matrix diffraction and the superlattice diffraction. An example
can be seen in a single crystal cobalt-base superalloy crept at 900 ◦C [73, 74] in Figure
2.28. The APB displays full contrast under superlattice diffraction (100) while there is
40
CHAPTER 2. BACKGROUND
Figure 2.28: TEM images showing the contrast of an APB. (a) The APB in contrastwith the superlattice diffraction (100). (b) The APB out of contrast with the matrixdiffraction (200) [73, 74].
only residual contrast under diffraction (200). This kind of contrast comparison reveals
the nature of an APB, which is different from other kinds of planar defects. A more
detailed analysis about the displacement vector involves a tilt series in combination
with the consideration of matrix and superlattice diffractions.
Fault vector determination
Similar to dislocation analysis, fault vectors can be determined by conducting a series of
tilting experiments and calculated from corresponding invisibility conditions. However,
as the phase factor for stacking fault is 2π, stacking faults can be invisible not only
when g ·R = 0, but also when g ·R equals to an integer [61–63, 67, 75]. The invisibility
criterion for stacking faults makes the fault vectors determination more difficult than
for dislocations. The planes of the stacking faults can be determined when the stacking
faults are oriented edge-on. It should also be noticed that stacking faults are closely
related with the partial dislocations that generate the stacking faults. Especially when
it comes to cutting mechanism into the γ′ phase, the interactions between dislocations
and stacking faults must be considered. The detailed analysis is presented in the result
section 5.4.
41
3. Scientific Objectives
The scientific objective of the present work is to contribute to a better understanding
of the elementary deformation processes which govern low temperature and high stress
creep (temperature: 750 ◦C, stress: 800 MPa) of the Ni-base single crystal superalloy
ERBO/1C. The present work represents the first investigation of this kind at the Chair
for Materials Science and Engineering of the Ruhr Universitat Bochum. Previous
work focused on the high temperature (above 1000 ◦C) and low stress (below 200 MPa)
regime. Different deformation mechanisms govern creep at different temperature and
stress regimes.
A peculiar type of creep behavior at 750 ◦C and 800 MPa has been observed during
[001] tensile loading for ERBO/1C. This kind of behavior has been observed before
and never been explained. The peculiar creep behavior has been referred to as double
minimum creep, where two creep rate minima were recorded: a first local minimum
(after 30 minutes, 0.1% strain) and a second global minimum (after 260 hours, 5%
strain). The main focus of the present work is to understand and explain the reasons
for these two creep minima.
The present work provides new insights into the elementary deformation mechanisms of
creep of Ni-base single crystal superalloys for the low temperature regime, because all
creep specimens are crystallographically precisely oriented and the influence of crystal-
lographic deviations from targeted growth directions has been excluded, an uncertainty
which has affected most of the previous work in this area. A series of interrupted ten-
sile creep tests was conducted to further confirm double minimum creep behavior and
investigate this creep phenomenon in detail.
Diffraction contrast TEM is used to study the microstructural evolution during double
minimum creep. Due to microstructural scatter, both large and small scale investi-
gation (montage investigation and single defect analysis) are employed for a better
43
CHAPTER 3. SCIENTIFIC OBJECTIVES
interpretation of the creep response to achieve a better understanding of deformation
mechanisms.
To describe microstructural evolution, defects (dislocations and planar defects) have
been determined both quantitatively and qualitatively. An effort was also made in the
present work to describe the distributions of microstructural parameters like γ′ particle
edge lengths and γ channel widths. Close attention was paid to small deviations from
the regularity of the arrangement of cuboidal γ′-particles in the γ/γ′-microstructure.
Regarding the importance of TEM techniques used in the present work, there is a need
to explain the procedures and to document the experimental steps in sufficient detail.
The goal of the present work is to use TEM investigations to explain double mini-
mum creep. Microstructural reasons have been identified in the present work, which
rationalize this peculiar creep behavior.
44
4. Materials and Experiments
4.1 Alloy and heat treatment
In the present work, a CMSX-4 type of superalloy referred to as ERBO/1 from the joint
research center SFB/ Transregio 103 is used for investigation [76]. The master alloy was
provided by Cannon Muskegon. It was cast into single crystal plates following a specific
heat treatment procedure. A typical cast plate used in the present work is shown in
Figure 4.1(a) with a special color coding indicating orientation distributions detected
by electron back scatter diffraction (EBSD). From the color coding, it is clear that
the majority of the plate is in [001] orientation, but there is also a small region which
deviates from [001]. A cut-up plan which documents the location of creep specimens
is shown in Figure 4.1(b). Knowing the position of specimens in the plate, their creep
responses can be better interpreted in terms of differences in orientation. For the
current work, all creep specimens and the associated thin foils for TEM investigation
stem from part C, where the material is precisely 〈001〉-oriented.
The nominal composition of ERBO/1 is shown in Table 4.1. It can be seen that the
investigated material contains about 3% Re. It is a second generation Ni-base single
crystal superalloy. The addition of Re improves the creep properties of a Ni-base single
crystal superalloy since Re is a strong solid solution strengthener at high temperatures,
due to the fact that it has a large atom radius [3, 77] and a very low diffusion coefficient
[78, 79]. Elements like Cr, Co, Mo, and W have been used for γ phase strengthening,
and elements like Al, Ta and Ti promote the formation of the γ′ phase. On one hand,
the addition of refractory elements has greatly improved the creep properties of Ni-
base single crystal superalloys. However, it increases the possibility of the formation
of topologically closed packed (TCP) phases, which are thought of as decreasing creep
strength of SX superalloys due to the depletion of matrix strengthening elements and
the fact that they can act as crack nucleation cites [80, 81].
45
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
A schematic chart for multi-step heat treatment of a Ni-base single crystal superalloy is
shown in Figure 4.2. A multi-step heat treatment has to be applied because the melt-
ing temperature of the interdendritic region is lower than the dissolution temperature
of the coarse γ′ phase, which needs to be dissolved [14]. To avoid incipient melting,
the starting temperature of heat treatment is set to be T1, which is slightly below
the melting temperature of the interdendritic regions in the starting material. During
a hold time at T1, interdiffusion occurs between dendritic and interdendritic regions.
Consequently, the melting temperature of interdendritic regions increases and the tem-
perature for the next-step heat treatment can be increased. When this procedure is
repeated a number of times, the melting temperature of interdendritic regions is even-
tually high enough, i.e., higher than the dissolution temperature of the γ′ phase. After
the coarse γ′ phase is dissolved, a precipitation heat treatment at lower temperature
leads to the formation of the derived fine γ/γ′ microstructure.
Although it is time-consuming, applying multi-step heat treatment is important to
homogenize the material. After full homogenization, the precipitation heat treatment
at T5 leads to the formation of the γ/γ′ microstructure. For the material investigated
in the present work, two specific heat treatments have been conducted: solution heat
treatment and precipitation heat treatment, as illustrated in Figure 4.3 and Figure 4.4.
Solution heat treatment has been designed for a more homogeneous microstructure
and a more uniform distribution of elements [82, 83]. As we know today, the following
precipitation heat treatment is designed for the evolution of cuboidal γ′ particles and
the formation of the γ/γ′ two-phase microstructure [82, 83], which will yield good creep
and fatigue properties.
Figure 4.1: (a) ERBO plate. (b) Cut-up plan.
46
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
The material investigated in the present work is referred to as ERBO/1C. Part of the
SX plate were precisely oriented and then miniature tensile creep specimens were cut
out using spark erosion. A real-time Laue camera of type MWL 120 from Multiwire
Laboratories is used for orientation. To obtain a specific orientation, a three-axis
goniometer is employed, which also fits into a electro discharge machine. More detailed
information about the orientation method and sample cutting parameters can be found
in [14, 18, 84]. The schematic drawing in Figure 4.5(a) shows the geometry of a
miniature specimen with a gauge length of 9 mm and a cross section of 2×3 mm2.
Figure 4.5(b) [85, 86] shows a miniature creep specimen in the load line, at the end of
an interrupted creep test after the furnace has been removed.
Figure 4.2: Schematic drawing showing multi-step heat treatment [14].
47
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
Figure 4.3: Flow chart showing solution heat treatment process.
Figure 4.4: Flow chart showing precipitation heat treatment process.
Figure 4.5: (a) Size and geometry for the miniature creep specimen. (b) Miniaturespecimen in furnace for high temperature creep [85, 86].
Table 4.1: Chemical composition of ERBO/1C in wt.%.
element Co Ta W Cr Al Re Ti Mo Hf Ni
wt.% 9.3 6.9 6.3 6.2 5.8 2.9 1.0 0.6 0.1 Bal.
48
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
4.2 Interrupted miniature creep tests at low tem-
perature and high stress
A series of interrupted tensile creep experiments have been conducted at a low tem-
perature (750 ◦C) and a high stress (800 MPa) for a [001] orientation. A standard
constant-load creep machine from Denison Mayers has been used to conduct miniature
creep testing. The creep machine is equipped with a vertically movable three-zone
furnace. Three control thermocouples are used to measure the temperature of three
heating zones and each heating zone is controlled by an Eurotherm controller. The
miniature creep specimens are placed in the temperature constant zone of the furnace.
For a precise temperature measurement, apart from three thermocouples at the fur-
nace, there are two measurement thermocouples fixed to the lower and upper ends
of the gauge lengths of miniature specimens. The creep temperature operated during
a creep tests at the gauge length of the specimen is 750 ◦C±1.5 ◦C. The miniature
specimens are mounted in special grips consisting of an oxide-dispersion-strengthened
(ODS) alloy PM 3030 from Plansee (Reutte, Austria) which are reinforced by ceramic
Al2O3 insets. Ceramic rods in tube extensometry and strain sensors positioned outside
the furnace are used for displacement measurement.
In the present work, the specimens were heated in 2 hours to the test temperature of
750 ◦C under a preload close to 20 MPa to keep the load line aligned. The specimens
were then loaded by balanced horizontal lever arms with load ratios of 1:15 to the
value corresponding to 800 MPa within a few seconds. In order to keep the level arm
in a horizontal position during the entire test, an electromechanical control system
has been used. The immediate elastic reaction of the specimen/grip assembly was not
considered as a creep strain. For a detailed investigation of double minimum creep
behavior, a series of interrupted creep tests was conducted after creep strain intervals
of 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 1, 2, and 5% respectively.
4.3 Scanning electron microscopy
Scanning electron microscopy has been used to obtain overviews of the microstructure.
SEM investigations were performed using a Zeiss Leo Gemini 1530 VP. It is equipped
with a field emission gun and an in-lens detector. Secondary electron and back scattered
electron signals are used for imaging. Good image conditions were obtained using
49
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
secondary electrons at a voltage of 10 kV and a working distance of 10 mm.
For SEM investigations, samples were ground using emery paper and polished using
diamant suspension (particle size 6 µm to 1 µm) with ethanol. A final well-polished
surface can be obtained using oxide polishing suspension (OPS) with distilled water.
For the optimum image contrast, two etching methods can be used. To etch out the
γ′ phase, a solution which consists of 40 ml distilled H2O, 20 ml HCl (37%) and 10 ml
H2O2 (30%) was used and the sample was etched for about 3 seconds. To etch out the
γ channel phase, the sample is electrochemical polished using electrolyte A2, which
contains 700 ml of ethanol, 120 ml distilled water, 100 ml of diethylene glycol diethyl
ether and 78 ml of perchloric acid with a concentration of 70 to 72% at an applied
voltage of 5 V and a flow rate of 12 for about 3-5 seconds. The γ/γ′ microstructure
can then be observed using secondary electrons. The dendritic and interdendritic
microstructure can be observed using back scattered electrons when the sample is not
etched.
4.4 Transmission electron microscopy
Transmission electron microscopy investigations were conducted using two TEMs. One
is a Tecnai Supertwin F20 G2 equipped with a high angle angular dark field detector
and an energy-dispersive X-Ray analysis system and operated at 200 kV. The other
microscopy is Jeol JEM-2100 F located at the Institute of Physics of Materials (IPM) in
Brno which also works at 200 kV. Both conventional TEM and scanning TEM modes
have been used for overview images and detailed defect analysis. To get a spatial
impression, a STEM stereo method was used for the observation of defects. For the
sake of a better contrast and a larger field of view, TEM montages were performed under
both CTEM and STEM image conditions. Each montage consists of nine individual
TEM images taken under the same two-beam condition and magnification.
TEM thin foils were obtained mainly by double jet electrochemical polishing. The
specimens were firstly cut into thin slices with a thickness of 0.4 µm using an Accutom 5
cutting disk from Struers. The thin slices were cut in both [001] and [111] orientations,
as can be seen in Figure 4.6. The thin slices were then ground to a thickness of
90 µm using emery paper of 4000 mesh size. The following double jet electrochemical
thinning process was performed in a TenuPol-5. The electrolyte used is of type A7,
which consists of 70 vol.% methanol, 20 vol.% glycerine and 10 vol.% perchloric acid.
50
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
Optimum thinning conditions were obtained at a temperature of −20 ◦C. Different flow
rates (of the order 20) and voltages (of the order 10 V) had to be applied for specimens
in different conditions.
Figure 4.6: Illustration of TEM specimens cutting from the creep miniature specimen.(a) [001] cutting and (b) [111] cutting.
4.5 Determination of γ′ volume fractions, γ channel
widths and γ′ cube edge lengths
To better characterize the material, the γ′ volume fraction was determined using a
simplified area fraction method. At the early stage of creep, i.e., at 0.1% creep strain,
a TEM foil of [001] orientation was made. A TEM montage was used to determine
the γ′ volume fraction. For a specific area in the montage, a large rectangle is used for
identification of the whole two-phase region. Each γ′ particle within the area is then
depicted with a small rectangle adjusted to its size. The γ′ volume fraction is then
determined using the sum of all γ′ rectangle areas divided by the large rectangular area
of the probe field, see in Figure 5.6.
Simple line intersection methods were used to obtain the distributions of γ channel
widths and γ′ particle edge lengths. Two vertical and two horizontal lines through
the montage area have been used and the length for γ channel width and γ′ particle
51
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
edge length have been measured. The intersection of γ channel and γ′ particles has
been marked with a single line, whose length will be measured. A single line section
has been used to mark each γ channel and the particle size of γ′ cube edge length can
be measured accordingly. The size distribution of γ channel width and γ′ cube edge
length can then be obtained. The quantification results will be shown in the result
section. The demonstration of these two methods along with the quantification results
can be seen in the result section (Figure 5.6).
4.6 Planar faults quantification
Dislocation and planar defects densities have been calculated based on quantitative
micrographic data from montages from [111] TEM foils. An example is shown in Figure
4.7, where a TEM montage image was taken at a g of (111), for an accumulated creep
strain of 2%. Figure 4.7(b) reveals a rectangular area F1 in Figure 4.7(a) at a higher
magnification while Figure 4.7(c) is the rectangular area F2 at a higher magnification.
Other numbers in Figures 4.7(a) and (b) will be used later for reference in the result
section. The number of stacking fault nPF has been counted. The individual projected
areas of planar defects aPF have been approximated as rectangles and both lengths L
and widths W were measured, as shown in Figure 4.7(b). The total projected area
fraction of all planar defects APF has been determined using the following Equation
4.1:
APF =
nPF∑i=1
aPF,i/am (4.1)
In Equation 4.1, aPF,i is the projected area of the ith planar defect (i corresponds to
the number of stacking fault.) and am is the investigated montage area. There are
planar defects on different planes. Some planar defects appear nearly edge-on, thus
yielding a very small projected area. The influence of such kind of planar defects may
be underestimated when simply using Equation 4.1. On the other hand, there are
planar faults which are fully contained in the foil plane. Furthermore, as the TEM
foil represents a thin slice which probes the single crystal superalloy microstructure,
such planar faults have a higher possibility of not being captured by the TEM foil
sampling. Taking these effects into consideration, a qualitative intensity parameter
IPF was introduced as a reasonable compromise. IPF is based on both APF and nPF
and normalized by the thickness of TEM foil tF , as can be seen in Equation 4.2:
IPF = (nPF · APF )/tF (4.2)
52
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
4.7 Dislocation density quantification
To obtain dislocation densities, Ham’s method [87, 88] has been employed. As can be
seen in Figure 4.7(c), a system of thin horizontal and vertical lines is used. The total
length of all horizontal (H) and vertical (V) lines in the evaluation grid is∑lH and∑
lV respectively. The counting procedure is demonstrated in Figure 4.7(d) at a higher
magnification for the rectangular region highlighted in Figure 4.7(c). Each white dot
in Figure 4.7(d) represents one intersection between dislocations and horizontal and
vertical reference lines, and this yields the average dislocation density ργ/γ′ in the γ/γ′
microstructure using the following evaluation:
ργ/γ′ = (1/tF ) ·(∑
NH ALL/∑
lH +∑
NV ALL/∑
lV
)(4.3)
In Equation 4.3, NH ALL and NV ALL stand for the total number of intersections be-
tween dislocation segments and horizontal and vertical reference lines, respectively. By
applying the method described above, it is possible to distinguish and track the posi-
tion of dislocations, i.e., whether the dislocation is in the γ phase or in the γ′ phase.
The volume fractions of the γ phase fγ and the volume fraction of γ′ phase fγ′ have
been taken into consideration as well.
The dislocation densities in the γ phase ργ and in the γ′ phase ργ′ have been described
in Equations 4.4 and 4.5, respectively:
ργ =1
tF
( ∑nH−γ∑fγ · lH
+
∑nV−γ∑fγ · lV
)(4.4)
ργ′ =1
tF
( ∑nH−γ′∑fγ′ · lH
+
∑nV−γ′∑fγ′ · lV
)(4.5)
In Equations 4.4 and 4.5, nH−γ and nV−γ stand for the number of intersections between
dislocations in the γ phase with reference lines in horizontal and vertical directions,
respectively. nH−γ′ and nV−γ′ specify the intersection in the γ′ phase.
As dislocation density is a microstructural parameter which shows high scatter, there
are regions where dislocation density is high (Figure 4.7(a), arrow 1) while there are
other regions where the dislocation density is very low (Figure 4.7(a), arrow 2). This
kind of scatter is determined by two highest/lowest measured dislocation densities and
this information is used for the upper and lower limits of the error bars, which are
53
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
Figure 4.7: Illustration of defect quantification. (a) TEM montage images taken after2% strain, g : (111). (b) Field F1 from (a) at a higher magnification. (c) Referencegrid for determination of dislocation density from Field F2 of (a). (d) Illustration ofcounting procedure.
54
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
shown in the result section together with the mean value.
4.8 TEM foil thickness determination
The quantification of planar fault and dislocation densities requires the information of
TEM foil thickness. In the present work, foil thicknesses were measured using Kossel-
Moellenstedt (K-M) fringes technique as described in [63, 89] using the convergent
beam electron diffraction (CBED) mode. Figure 4.8 gives an example of the thickness
measurement. The white circle in Figure 4.8(a) indicates the location in the foil where
the thickness is measured. The inset in the lower right of the micrograph indicates
the diffraction pattern taken with selected aperture for the g-condition used. Using
the information from the diffraction pattern it is possible to measure lattice spacing
dhkl for the corresponding g-condition. Kossel fringes can be better observed at a
larger camera length, as shown in Figure 4.8(b), the distance between transmitted and
diffracted disk is measured as Dd. Measurement of fringe distances can be seen in a
higher magnification in Figure 4.8(c). The right edge of the first fringe is set as a
reference. The distance between the second and first fringes is marked as l1 while the
distance between the third fringe and the first fringe is marked as l2 and so forth. All
the measured values are listed in Table 4.2. The fewer number of fringes correspond to
the thinner TEM foils. The increase of one fringe reflects a thickness increase by one
extinction distance ξg [63].
A series of deviation value si can be obtained for the nth fringe using the following
equation [63]:
si = λli
Dd · d2hkl(4.6)
For an operation of 200 kV, the wave length λ is 0.0025 nm, and dhkl has been measured
to be 0.2067 nm. Foil thickness and extinction distance can then be fitted out using
Equation 4.7 as follows [63]:
(sini
)2
+ (1
ξg · ni)2
=1
t2(4.7)
In Equation 4.7, ni is an integer and corresponds to the number of fringes. With all
the calculated s value, a line can then be fitted, as shown in Figure 4.8(d). Both
extinction distance ξg and foil thickness t can be obtained, since the slope of the fitted
55
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
line is −1/ξg2 and the intercept with y axis is 1/t2, Figure 4.8(d). The foil thickness
is estimated to be 335 nm and an extinction distance to be 217 nm. It is a trial-and-
error process to get the optimum fitted line, but there is software which can easily
fit the curve.
Table 4.2: Parameters for thickness measurement.
i li/nm−1 si/nm−1 (si/ni)2/nm−2
1 0.54 0.0069 4.79× 10−5
2 1.11 0.0141 4.98× 10−5
3 1.65 0.0210 4.89× 10−5
4 2.20 0.0279 4.88× 10−5
5 2.84 0.0362 5.24× 10−5
4.9 Tilt experiments for identification of linear and
planar defects
Burger’s vectors b for dislocations and displacement vectors R for planar faults can be
determined by tilting experiments. The tilt positions are established with the Kikuchi
diffraction patterns for orientation [61–63]. At least seven g-vectors should be used and
a minimum of two invisibility conditions should be obtained, as has been described in
the background section. In the present work, tilt experiments are performed mainly for
TEM samples with a [111] foil normals in CTEM mode. To obtain optimum contrast
conditions, low-index g-vectors are used, such as {200}, {111} and {220}. Due to the
limited tilt range available in the TEM, and the large angular distance between 〈111〉and 〈110〉 poles, {200} g-vectors cannot be easily established.
Analyses of perfect dislocations and planar defects are conducted in a similar manner,
except that there are more invisibility possibilities for planar faults. A precise deter-
mination of the displacement vectors of planar faults need to account for the partial
dislocations which limit the planar faults. A series of systematic tilting experiments
have been conducted with a positive deviation parameter s (See section 2.5). There
are also cases where both positive and negative g-vectors were applied.
As w plays an important role in partial dislocation analysis, it is necessary to describe
56
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
Figure 4.8: Illustration of the thickness measurement using CBED. (a) A TEM imagewith a white spot indicating beam position, with diffraction pattern as an inset image.(b) Measurement of distance Dd between transmitted and diffracted disks. (c) Mea-surement of fringe distances. (d) Calculation of foil thickness and extinction distance.
57
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
Figure 4.9: Illustration of measurement of s. (a) Illustration of x and R value. (b)Example of an operating g-condition. (c) Measurement of x and R from the operatingg diffraction pattern.
briefly how the value of w can be calculated. The parameter w is defined as ξg · s [61–
63], where ξg is the extinction distance, which is related to the material, the operating
voltage and the g-vector. The measurement of w is illustrated in an example, as shown
in Figure 4.9.
The deviation parameter from exact Bragg condition s is defined using the following
Equation 4.8:
s =x
R· |g|2 · λ (4.8)
In Equation 4.8, x is the distance between the center of the transmitted beam and
the deficient line, and R is the distance between the center of transmitted beam and
diffracted beam, as demonstrated in Figure 4.9(a). |g| can be calculated as 1/d, d is
the lattice spacing and λ is the wave length of the electron in the TEM. The value of
ξg was taken for pure nickel from [61].
An example is shown in Figures 4.9(b) and (c). Figure 4.9(b) is one two-beam condition
and the operating g-condition is indicated as the central white arrow. For a more
precise determination of the circle center and the measurement of R, the choice of the
circle size is based on the disk size for the transmitted and diffracted beams in Figure
58
CHAPTER 4. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTS
4.9(b). Figure 4.9(c) is the same image as in Figure 4.9(b) with enhanced contrast in
order to better figure out the position of Kikuchi lines and to facilitate the distance
measurement for better identification. When the Kikuchi lines corresponding to the
operating g-vector are determined, the value of x and R can be measured. With the
measured x and R values, as well as ξg , the value of w can be calculated.
59
5. Results
5.1 Double minimum creep at low temperature and
high stress
Interrupted creep test results for 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 1, 2, and 5% accumulated strains at
750 ◦C and 800 MPa are shown in Figure 5.1. It can be seen that all creep curves
fall into one narrow scatter band and the creep results are quite reproducible. Figure
5.1(a) shows creep data plotted as strain ε vs. time t. Figure 5.1(b) shows logarithmic
creep rates plotted as a function of strain and in Figure 5.1(c) the logarithm of creep
rates is plotted as a function of the logarithm of strain. It should be noted that Figure
5.1(c) is not a traditional way to present creep curves, in this type of plots, the peculiar
change of creep rates with strain can be best appreciated. From Figures 5.1(b) and
(c), it can be seen that there is an initial sharp decrease of strain rate. A first creep
rate minimum is reached at 0.1% strain after 30 minutes. Then there is an increase
of strain rate towards an intermediate local maximum at 1% strain reached after 1.5
hours. Subsequently, strain rate steadily decreases towards a broad minimum at 5%,
reached after 260 hours. Figures 5.1(b) and (c) clearly show that in the LTHS regime,
the evolution of creep rates cannot be simply referred to as primary, secondary and
tertiary creep. For clarity, the creep deformation process has been divided into three
stages: stage I, stage II and stage III, as indicated in Figure 5.1(c). Stage I is the
period up to 0.1% strain, where the first local minimum is reached. In stage II, strain
rates increase towards an intermediate maximum at 1%. The decrease of creep rate
towards a broad minimum is indicated as stage III. TEM samples were prepared from
each interrupted creep test to study the evolution of microstructure during this peculiar
type of creep behavior.
61
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.1: Creep curves from interrupted tests of ERBO / 1C (750 ◦C and 800 MPa).(a) Strain ε as a function of time t. (b) Logarithm of creep rate as a function of strain.(c) Logarithm of creep rate as a function of logarithmic strain.
62
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
5.2 Microstructure evolution
TEM montages have been used for the investigation of microstructure evolution, as
described in the background section of the work. Before showing full montages, it is
worth to take a closer look at the microstructure of the initial state, prior to creep.
The TEM microstructure of the initial state in [001] orientation is shown in Figure 5.2.
Figures 5.2(a) and (b) were taken under a multi-beam condition in STEM mode in
the [001] zone. Figure 5.2(a) is a STEM BF image and Figure 5.2(b) shows a STEM
HAADF micrograph. High resolution TEM (HRTEM) can be used to identify the γ
channels and the γ′ particles, as shown in Figures 5.2(c) and (d), respectively.
For the [001] orientation, horizontal (parallel to the [010] direction) and vertical chan-
nels (parallel to the [001] direction) can be easily distinguished. From the STEM
BF and HAADF images in Figures 5.2(a) and (b), some interesting local microstruc-
tural features can be observed. Arrows 1 and 2 in Figure 5.2(a), point to some small
spheroidal γ′ particles which appear inside of γ channels, and have been referred to as
the secondary γ′ particles. Moreover, dislocations, as highlighted by arrows 3 and 4 in
Figure 5.2(b), have been observed at the γ/γ′ interface. Close to the γ/γ′ interface,
these dislocations are associated with grooves, as was reported earlier in [90].
The normal FCC structure of the γ phase and ordered L12 structure of the γ′ phase
can be detected by performing a fast Fourier transformation (FFT) analyses for these
two phases. In Figures 5.2(c) and (d), two small white rectangles indicate the positions
where this type of analyses were performed. The corresponding FFTs can be seen in
the lower right corner of Figures 5.2(c) and (d). Comparing the FFT images in Figures
5.2(c) and (d), it can be seen that in Figure 5.2(c), for the γ matrix phase, it is a classic
FCC structure with a four-fold symmetry in [001] orientation. In contrast, extra {100}superlattice spots are observed, highlighted by small white arrows in Figure 5.2(d).
They indicate the presence of the ordered γ′ phase. The filtered high resolution images
in the middle of Figures 5.2(c) and (d) provide clearer images of the arrangement of
atoms in the two phases.
In addition to TEM investigations, SEM investigations were carried out to obtain
an impression on how much the γ/γ′ microstructure changes with exposure of low
temperature and high stress creep. Figures 5.3(a) and (b) show [001] and [111] cross
sections of the initial state. Figures 5.3(c) and (d) were taken after 5% creep at 750 ◦C
and 800 MPa. The specimens from which the SEM images in Figures 5.3(a) and (c)
63
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
were obtained, were in [001] orientation, while Figures 5.3(b) and (d) show [111] cross
sections. By comparing [001] and [111] cross sections, we can see that in [111] cross
sections, the projections of the γ′ particles often appear as triangles (Figure 5.3(b),
small arrow pointing up) and hexagons (Figure 5.3(b), small arrow pointing down).
Moreover, it can be seen that even after 5% creep strain at 750 ◦C and 800 MPa, there
is no significant rafting. This indicates that the peculiar creep curves shown in Figure
5.1 cannot be rationalized on the basis of rafting.
A TEM montage of a {111} cross section of the initial state is shown in Figure 5.4.
The morphology of the projected γ′ particles shapes show the triangular and hexagonal
features which are also observed in SEM. In this type of cross sections, the γ channels
cannot be easily distinguished as horizontal and vertical channels. In this case, hori-
zontal and vertical channels have been identified when necessary. At two locations, the
γ channels and γ′ particles for [111] cross sections are indicated by white arrows.
Dislocations can also be observed in the initial state. From the montage in Figure
5.4 we can see that there are some randomly distributed dislocations at the γ/γ′ inter-
faces. The overall dislocation density appears to be quite low in the initial state.
Figure 5.5 shows a montage of TEM micrograph which characterizes the material state
after 0.1% creep deformation. The TEM image was taken at a g-condition of (111).
It can be clearly seen that there are new features as compared to the microstructure
of the initial state. The first feature is the appearance of a small number of inclined
stacking faults, as highlighted by two black arrows pointing to the left.
Even though 0.1% is a small amount of deformation, a small number of stacking faults
can already be observed. The second feature is revealed by the dark dislocation lines.
Unlike in the initial state, where dislocations are distributed randomly, at 0.1% strain,
dislocations are observed to glide in specific γ channels, as highlighted by two dashed
rectangles 1 and 2. At this point, it appears as if dislocations glide more in one type
of channel while other channels remain empty. Extended dislocation segments can be
observed in the dashed rectangle 2. In the direction which is indicated by the long
black arrow in the rectangle, dislocation segments seem to fill that channel while in
other directions dislocations gliding appear to be absent.
Figure 5.6 shows quantification results for γ channel width and γ′ cube edge length from
TEM montage images. Figure 5.6(a) shows the montage of a state which was deformed
to 0.1% strain. A system of reference lines was used for quantitative evaluation as
64
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.2: TEM images showing microstructure of ERBO/1 at initial state. (a) STEMBF image. (b) STEM HAADF image. (c) HRTEM of the γ phase. (d) HRTEM of theγ′ phase.
65
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.3: SEM micrographs of the γ/γ′ microstructure of ERBO/1C before and aftercreep at 750 ◦C and 800 MPa. (a) Initial state, [001] cross section. (b) Initial state,[111] cross section. (c) After creep, [001] cross section. (d) After creep, [111] crosssection.
66
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.4: TEM montage for the initial state prior to creep, foil normal [111].
67
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.5: TEM montage for 0.1% deformation, foil normal [111], g=(111).
68
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
was described in the chapter materials and experiment. Figures 5.6(b) and (c) show
histograms which present the distribution of the γ channel width and γ′ cube edge
length. A mean value for γ channel width is measured to be 65 nm and the average
γ′ cube edge width is estimated to be 442 nm. It is clear from Figures 5.6(b) and (c)
that local microstructural parameters (γ channel width and γ′ cube edge length) are
distributed quantities which can vary between 10 and 130 nm for γ channel width and
between 50 to 800 nm for γ′ cube edge length. This suggests that when discussing local
events in the γ/γ′ microstructure, it is not sufficient to simply refer to the average γ
channel width and γ′ cube edge length. Volume fraction of γ channel phase and γ′
particles have also been estimated from Figure 5.6: 27% and 73% respectively. These
values are in good agreement with the result of 72% γ′ volume fraction using another
method for the same material [14].
As creep deformation increased from 0.1% to 0.2%, creep rate starts to increase again.
From the microstructure in Figure 5.7, it can be seen that there are more dislocation
and stacking fault activities during the deformation process. Compared to 0.1% creep
strain, there are more dislocations filling in γ channels. Similar to previous deforma-
tion stage, there is also one leading direction where there are more dislocation activities
compared to other directions. Moreover, more stacking faults are cutting into γ′ par-
ticles. The observed stacking faults are inclined in the same way, and the quantity for
stacking faults is still quite small.
When creep strain reaches 0.4%, the creep rate is close to the intermediate maximum
at 1% strain. As compared to 0.2% strain, there is a significantly higher density
of dislocations in the γ channels and there are much more stacking faults in the γ′
particles at 0.4% creep strain, as shown in Figure 5.8. The white dashed line is used
to indicate horizontal channel direction where the dislocation density is higher. When
the term “horizontal channel” is used (here and in the following), it is referred to the
γ channels which are horizontal during [001] tensile creep testing. They cannot be
easily recognized when a {111} foil is cut out of a [001] specimen after deformation.
As expected for high symmetry 〈001〉 loading, planar faults can be observed in the γ′
phase on all four {111} type planes. At 0.4% strain, planar faults on three different
slip planes have been clearly observed, as indicated by arrows 1, 2 and 3. Arrow 1
indicates the planar faults which are parallel to the TEM foil normal. Arrows 2 and 3
indicate planar faults which are inclined in two slip planes. It is clear that the contrasts
of stacking faults which are parallel to the foil normal is different from those of the
inclined stacking faults. Another kind of planar faults is oriented edge-on and thus out
of contrast under the operating g-condition. It should also be highlighted that at this
stage there are few dislocations which have entered the γ′ particles. One example is
69
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.6: TEM montage image for 0.1% deformation, foil normal [001]. (a) TEMmontage with horizontal and vertical reference lines. (b) Histogram showing γ channelwidth distribution. (c) Histogram showing γ′ cube edge length distribution.
70
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.7: TEM montage for 0.2% deformation, foil normal [111]. g=(111).
71
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.8: TEM montage for 0.4% deformation, foil normal [111]. g=(111).
shown in the dashed circular area where one dislocation seems to be interacting with
a stacking fault.
At a strain of 1%, where the creep rate is at the intermediate maximum, the microstruc-
ture looks similar to the previous deformation stage at 0.4% strain, as displayed in
Figure 5.9. Under this operating g-condition, planar faults which are edge-on can be
more clearly observed, as highlighted by two arrows in the lower left part of the image.
It is apparent that the dislocation density is still high and stacking faults are now a
prominent feature of the microstructure.
As creep strain approaches 5%, the second broad creep rate minimum is obtained. For
comparison with previous deformation stages, montage images at the CTEM mode are
72
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
shown in Figure 5.10. The microstructure at 5% creep strain is more homogeneous
and overall uniform. The dislocation densities are high in all γ channels and it is now
difficult to tell which channel is horizontal. Due to the very high dislocation density,
HAADF STEM imaging gets advantages giving better contrast, as can be seen in Figure
5.11. Dislocations and planar defects show a bright contrast. After 5% creep strain,
the density of planar faults decreased. Moreover, it can be clearly observed that there
are more dislocations inside the γ′ particles, and there are more frequent observation
of interactions between dislocations and planar faults, as highlighted by three dashed
circles in Figure 5.11.
An overview summary of experimental details which characterize the TEM specimens
of the present work is given in Table 5.1. These details include the foil thickness, the
operating g-vector, the montage area and the number of the γ′ particles within the
montage area. It should be noticed that in 〈001〉 tensile testing, eight microscopic
crystallographic slip systems experience the same resolved shear stress. Therefore it is
reasonable to assume that each g-vector of 〈111〉 type shows a representative part of
the overall dislocation substructure. Table 5.1 shows that the montage area for each
deformation stage is similar and comparable.
73
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.9: TEM montage for 1% deformation, foil normal [111]. g=(111).
74
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.10: CTEM montage for 5% deformation, foil normal [111]. g=(111).
75
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.11: STEM montage for 5% deformation, foil normal [111]. g=(111).
Table 5.1: Overview of experimental details characterizing the TEM foils investigatedin the present work.
strain/% tF/nm g-vector am/µm2 number of γ′ particles
0.1 335 (111) 32.1 111
0.2 160 (111) 33.2 122
0.4 260 (111) 29.4 117
1.0 295 (111) 24.2 102
2.0 373 (111) 33.7 112
5.0 238 (111) 29.3 104
76
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
5.3 Evolution of dislocation and planar fault densi-
ties
Dislocation and planar fault densities, as derived from TEM montages, are plotted with
the evolution of deformation strain as a function of creep strain in Figures 5.12 and
5.13. Figure 5.12(a) shows the evolution of the overall dislocation density in the γ/γ′
microstructure ργ/γ′ with creep strain. Figures 5.12(b) and (c) differentiate between
the dislocation densities in the γ channels ργ and in the γ′ particles ργ′ respectively.
The increase of dislocation density in the γ′ particles indicated in Figure 5.12(c) is
fully in line with the qualitative impression which one obtains when comparing Figure
5.8 (low dislocation densities in the γ′ particles) and Figures 5.10 and 5.11 (elevated
dislocation densities in the γ′ particles). Dislocation densities increase in the later stage
of deformation for both γ channels and γ′ particles. Figure 5.13 shows the evolution
of planar faults with deformation. In Figure 5.13(a) we can see the number density of
planar faults per area of corresponding montage area aPF/am plotted as a function of
strain. Figure 5.13(b) illustrates how projected area fraction APF evolves with creep
strain. Finally, the intensity of the planar fault activity as captured by the parameter
IPF (see Equation 4.2) is plotted as a function of creep strain.
It is suggested from Figure 5.13 that at the early stage of deformation there is only a
small amount of planar faults. Then it seems that there is an optimum condition for
the formation of planar faults in the γ′ phase at accumulated strains between 0.4% and
1% strain. With further increasing strain, the condition for planar fault cutting is not
optimum anymore, and there is a decreasing contribution of planar fault cutting into
the γ′ phase.
77
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.12: Dependence of dislocation densities on creep strain. (a) Overall dislocationdensity ργ/γ′ . (b) Dislocation density in the γ channels ργ. (c) Dislocation density inthe γ′ particles ργ′ .
78
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.13: Evolution of planar faults with creep strain. (a) Number density of planarfaults per area nPF/am. (b) Projected area fraction APF . (c) Intensity parameter IPF .For details see texts.
79
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
5.4 Identification of dislocation character
Initial state
Burger’s vectors of dislocations in ERBO/1C in its initial state have been determined
using the effective invisibility criterion. Figure 5.14 shows one example of a tilt series
under different two-beam conditions. Figures 5.14(a) to (k) are bright field images.
Figure 5.14(l) is the kikuchi map indicating all corresponding tilt positions and g-
vectors. Six dislocations have been analyzed, marked as 1 to 6. Dislocation 6 is
effectively invisible in Figure 5.14(a) under a g-vector of (111) but in full contrast in
Figure 5.14(b) of g-vector (111). Other invisibilities for dislocation 6 can be found in
Figures 5.14(g) (131) and (k) (020). With these three invisibility conditions and by
the applying effective invisibility criterion, the Burger’s vector can be identified using
scalar operation. Dislocation 6 is then identified as of type ±a/2 [101].
The same procedure can be used for the other dislocations. The visibility and invisi-
bility conditions for all the dislocations under investigation have been summarized in
Table 5.2. Visibility is represented by a “+” symbol and invisibility is represented by
a “-” symbol. From Table 5.2 we can see that all observed dislocations at the initial
state are of 〈011〉 type, which is consistent with previous reports [15, 90].
Creep state
Applying similar tilting experiments, Burger’s vectors b of dislocations and displace-
ment vectors R for stacking faults were analyzed after 1% creep strain at 750 ◦C and
800 MPa in STEM mode. As can be seen in Figure 5.15, nine dislocations (marked
as numbers 1 to 9) and two stacking faults (marked as numbers 10 to 11) have been
analyzed. The four images presented in Figure 5.15 are part of a full tilting series of 11
g-vectors. Figures 5.15(a) to(c) were taken in bright field mode under g-vectors (200),
(111), and (111) respectively, while Figure 5.15(d) was taken in the HAADF mode un-
der the same g-condition as Figure 5.15(b). A combination of BF and HAADF images
can be used for the identification of the nature of a stacking fault.
Dislocation 1 is in full contrast in Figure 5.15(a) under the condition g=(200), while
it is out of contrast in Figure 5.15(b) for g=(111). Dislocations 3, 4, 5, and 7 show no
80
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.14: TEM micrographs of initial state under different two-beam conditions.(a) to (k) Bright field images. (l) Kikuchi map indicating tilt positions and g-vectors.
81
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Table 5.2: g-vectors and effective visibilities and invisibilities of dislocations from Fig-ure 5.14.
1 2 3 4 5 6
g1 (111) + + + + + -
g2 (111) - - + + + +
g3 (111) + + - - - +
g4 (220) + + + + + +
g5 (202) + + + + + +
g6 (022) + + + + + +
g7 (131) + + + + + -
g8 (311) - - + + + +
g9 (113) + + - - - +
g10 (200) - - + + + +
g11 (020) + + + + + -
±2b/a [011] [011] [110] [110] [110] [101]
contrast in Figure 5.15(c) while they are fully visible in Figure 5.15(b). The same type
of contrast analysis can be applied for other dislocations. A summary of dislocation
visibilities is shown in Table 5.3. There are also cases where it is difficult to conclude
whether a dislocation is visible or not. Situations like this have been marked with a
“?”. In relative higher order g-conditions such as {022} or {113}, dislocations can
show residual or double contrast, which is indicated as “res” or “do”.
An anaglyph made from a stereo pair has been taken to illustrate the spatial arrange-
ment of dislocations and stacking faults, as shown in Figure 5.16. When viewed with
colored glasses (red: left eye, blue: right eye), it can be seen that dislocations are
inclined at the interface of the γ/γ′ microstructure or lie in the γ channel phase except
for dislocation 6, which is inside of a γ′ particle. The analysis of dislocations involves
the theory for partial dislocation determination. The complete invisibility of disloca-
tion 6 in Figure 5.15(c) under the condition of (111) indicates that the dislocation 6
lies in (111) plane. As mentioned earlier, for partial dislocations a scalar product of
1/3 also indicates invisibility. A trial-and-error analysis for dislocation 6 suggests that
the dislocation is of type 1/6 [211]. For dislocation 6, the calculated value in brackets
after the visibility indications in Table 5.3 matches this conclusion. If the dislocation
is of type 1/3 [211], it would be visible for g2, g5 and g11, which is not consistent with
the experimental results.
82
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.15: Four STEM images taken as a part of a tilt series for the determinationof Burger’s vector and displacement vectors of planar faults crept at 750 ◦C, 800 MPa,1%. (a) to (c) STEM BF images. (d) HAADF image.
83
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
From the results in Table 5.3, we can conclude that all dislocations are of 〈110〉 type
except for dislocation 6. This is similar to what was found for the initial state. Different
types of dislocations also indicate activation of different slip systems. The Burger’s
vector of dislocations inside of the γ′ particle are different from the dislocations at the
interface. Partial dislocation inside of γ′ particles are closely associated with stacking
faults. In Table 5.3 the first three rows have been highlighted in gray, indicating the
g-vectors for which micrographs are shown in Figure 5.15 (Figure 5.15(d) shows the
same region as in Figure 5.15(b), only in dark field mode.). The corresponding TEM
images at other g-conditions are not shown here.
The analysis of stacking faults requires careful examination of the contrast of fringes.
To explain this, Figure 5.15(d) shows two insets at higher magnification of stacking
faults. The contrasts of the outermost fringes can be clearly observed. From the two
insets, we can see that for stacking fault 10, g-condition (111) points away from the
bright outermost fringe. This allows to conclude that stacking fault 10 is a superlattice
intrinsic stacking fault (SISF) based on the criteria summarized in Figure 2.27. For
stacking fault 11, g-condition (111) points towards a bright outermost fringe, which
indicates that the stacking fault is a superlattice extrinsic stacking fault (SESF). At
the condition of 1% deformation strain at 750 ◦C, 800 MPa, both SISF and SESF can
be found. Both stacking faults 10 and 11 have been out of contrast at g-conditions of
(111), (022), (131) and (113). The plane stacking faults inclined is (111) and there are
three possible displacement vectors on this plane, i.e., [211], [121], [112]. It is difficult
to decide which displacement vector is the correct one and to determine the pre-factor.
Additional methods are needed to reach the final conclusions. More information for
stacking faults analysis can be found in the next section.
84
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Tab
le5.
3:R
esult
sfr
omT
EM
tilt
exp
erim
ents
afte
r1%
cree
pst
rain
for
incl
ined
fault
s,g
-vec
tors
:g
(1to
11),
def
ects
:(1
-9:
dis
loca
tion
s,10
and
11:
pla
nar
fault
s).
Fie
lds
hig
hligh
ted
ingr
ay:
Fig
ure
s5.
15(a
)to
(c).
res:
resi
dual
contr
ast,do
:dou
ble
contr
ast,?
:no
det
erm
inat
ion
pos
sible
,b
:B
urg
ers
vect
or,R
:pla
nar
fault
dis
pla
cem
ent
vect
or.
gan
dd
12
34
56
78
910
11
1:(2
00)
++
++
-+
(±2/
3)+
+-
++
2:(1
11)
-+
++
+-
(±1/
3)+
++
++
3:(1
11)
+-
--
--
(0)
-re
s-
--
4:(0
22)
+re
s/do
++
+-
(0)
++
+-
-
5:(1
11)
+-
--
+-
(±1/
3)-
-+
++
6:(1
31)
-+
/do
++
+-
(0)
++
+-
-
7:(2
20)
++
++
+-
(±1/
3)+
++
++
8:(3
11)
++
++
res
+(±
2/3)
++
res
++
9:(1
13)
++
/do
++
+-
(0)
++
+-
-
10:
(002
)+
?+
+?
?+
?+
++
11:
(202
)+
--
-+
-(±
1/3)
-re
s+
++
2b/a
and
3R/a±
[101
]±
[101
]±
[101
]±
[101
]±
[011
]±
1/3
[211
]±
[101
]±
[101
]±
[011
]±
[112
]±
[112
]
85
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.16: Anaglyph showing spatial arrangement of defects from Figure 5.15.
86
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
5.5 Identification of planar fault displacement vec-
tors R
Displacement vectors R for stacking faults have been analyzed using conventional tilt-
ing experiments and high resolution TEM. Both inclined stacking faults and in-plane
stacking faults (parallel to foil normal) are investigated. For the low temperature and
high stress creep regime, as considered in the current work, the activity of planar faults
is closely related to dislocations. In the case of in-plane stacking faults, it is easier to
observe the interactions between dislocation and planar faults, thus both defects will
be jointly analyzed.
Inclined stacking fault
A set of TEM images was obtained after 2% creep strain with a (111) TEM foil, as
shown in Figure 5.17. A schematic kikuchi map is firstly shown in Figure 5.17(a),
indicating all the tilt positions and g-vectors close to the [111] zone. Figures 5.17(b)
to (i) are TEM images corresponding to different g-vectors. Except for Figure 5.17(c)
which was taken in the CDF mode, the other TEM images were taken in BF mode.
From the TEM images it can be seen that the stacking fault under investigation is
oriented nearly edge-on under the g-condition of (002) and it is effectively invisible
under g-condition of (202). All the effective visibility and invisibility conditions have
been summarized in Table 5.4 for the stacking fault investigated in Figure 5.17. With
these two invisibilities, it can be concluded that the stacking fault lies in the (111)
plane and its displacement vector is of type 〈121〉.
Figures 5.17(b) and (c) illustrate the change of contrast of the fringes and the two insets
make it possible to distinguish fringe contrast. From the inset in Figure 5.17(b) we can
see that both outermost fringes are bright, while in Figure 5.17(c) the two outermost
fringes display opposite contrast. The small black arrow in Figure 5.17(b), indicating
the fringe where the contrast is the same in both BF and CDF images, points to the
top of the stacking fault, i.e., the position of SF interacting with TEM foil. The bright
fringe in the BF image suggests that the scalar product of the operating g-vector and
the displacement vector is positive. Possible displacement vectors could be [121], [211],
or [112]. Furthermore, in Figure 5.17(c), as g points towards the bright fringe, it can
be concluded that the stacking fault is a SESF. Taking crystallographic information of
87
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Table 5.4: g-vectors and effective visibilities and invisibilities of the stacking fault inFigure 5.17.
g (111) (111) (220) (202) (002) (022) (111) (111)
SF + + + - + + + -
the ordered L12 structure into consideration, as for (111) plane, a displacement vector
of 1/3 [211] will introduce a SISF. In contrast, 1/3 [121] and 1/3 [112] displacement will
generate SESFs (see Figure A.6). As it is clear that the stacking fault is extrinsic
in nature, a vector of 1/3 [211] can be ruled out. However, a vector of 1/6 [211] can
generate a CSF composed of a SESF and an APB. A CSF normally requires much
higher energy to form and there is no clear evidence of the formation of an APB under
this condition. Therefore it seems reasonable to conclude that the fault has a vector
of 1/3 [121] or 1/3 [112]. More methods such as large angle convergent beam electron
diffraction (LACBED) have to be employed to precisely distinguish the vector of the
stacking fault.
When the leading partial dislocation is possible to detect, the stacking fault generated
by the dislocation can also be figured out. However, for the current example, the
leading dislocation is in most cases difficult to distinguish due to the relative small
size of the associated dislocation and difficult contrast determination at different tilt
positions. In this case, the example of in-plane stacking fault is considered, as can be
seen in the following section.
In-plane stacking fault
For the creep strain of 0.4% or higher, there are more slip systems activated and
stacking faults can be observed in more than one {111} plane. TEM foils with a normal
orientation of [111] contain inclined stacking faults and stacking faults which lie in the
plane of the foil. The in-plane stacking faults hold certain advantages compared to
the inclined ones. Dislocations associated with in-plane stacking faults are usually
relatively easier to distinguish.
Figure 5.18 shows examples of stacking faults in the foil plane after 1% deformation,
and the contrast of this kind of stacking fault is different compared with the inclined
stacking faults. Unlike dark and bright fringes of inclined stacking faults, in-plane
stacking faults show higher intensities as compared with background contrast or the
88
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.17: TEM micrographs taken after 2% strain under different two-beam condi-tions. (a) Kikuchi map. (b) and (d) to (i) BF images. (c) CDF image.
89
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
contrast from the γ′ particles. In Figure 5.18(a), there are three in-plane stacking faults
which have been marked as f1, f2, and f3 under investigation. A number of dislocations,
either bounding the stacking faults or in the γ matrix phase have been identified and
investigated. They are marked as 1 to 8. Figure 5.18(b) documents the conducting
g-vectors used for the tilting experiments.
A full tilt series is presented in Figure 5.19, and the investigated area has been tilted
to twelve different g-vectors. Under some g-conditions stereo images are made. In this
case, the images under similar g-conditions are not shown in Figure 5.19, rather shown
as anaglyphs, like those shown in Figure 5.20 and Figure 5.21.
The three in-plane faults, i.e., f1 to f3, are effectively invisible for all three 〈220〉 type
of g-vectors, in line with a fault plane of (111). From the stereo images in Figure 5.20
and Figure 5.21, it can be better seen that the faults are in-plane and not inclined.
Figure 5.20 was taken under the condition of (111) and Figure 5.21 was taken under
the condition of (111).
The analysis of partial dislocations requires the knowledge of the value of w and a
comparison of contrast. A summary of the w value and the visibility conditions is
shown in Table 5.5. It is necessary to bring in the criterion for the determination
of partial dislocation with regard to w value. It has been well-accepted that a value
of ±1/3 of scalar product g · b yields an invisibility regardless of w value [61, 72].
When w is small, a value of ±2/3 of scalar product g · b also indicates a visibility
[61, 72]. However, when w is larger than 1, a value of +2/3 of scalar product g · bguarantees visibility, while a value of -2/3 implies an invisible condition [61, 72]. With
this aforementioned criterion, both the magnitude and the sign of the Burger’s vector
for dislocations can be determined. Dislocations 1 and 2 and dislocations 2 and 3 are
used as two pairs of examples to clarify this point.
The results presented in Figure 5.19 and Table 5.5 suggest that dislocation 1 is effec-
tively invisible for g-vectors (111), (220) and (111) while it is in contrast for all other
diffraction conditions. These invisibilities ascertain that the investigated dislocations
are partial dislocations. The result obtained for the diffraction condition g8(220) in
Figure 5.19(e) allows to conclude that the Burger’s vectors for dislocation 1 to 5 lie
in (111) plane and there are three possible types of partial dislocations, i.e., ± [112],
± [121] and ± [211]. A trial-and-error practice by taking the visibilities and invisibili-
ties into consideration enables us to narrow down the possibilities of Burger’s vector to
±a/6 [112] for dislocation 1. Burger’s vectors of ±1/3 [121] indicate visibility for dislo-
90
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Fig
ure
5.18
:(a
)In
-pla
ne
fault
s,ST
EM
mic
rogr
aph
take
naf
ter
1%st
rain
under
two-
bea
mco
ndit
ion.
(b)
Kik
uch
im
apin
dic
atin
gdiff
eren
tti
ltp
osit
ions.
91
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.19: STEM BF micrographs taken after 1% strain under different two-beamconditions for in-plane stacking faults and dislocations investigation. (a) g1 : (111).(b) g2 : (202). (c) g3 : (200). (d) g4 : (111). (e) g5 : (022). (f) g6 : (111). (g) g7 : (131).(h) g8 : (220). (i) g9 : (311). (j) g10 : (111). (k) g11 : (113). (l) g12 : (002).
92
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.20: An anaglyph under condition of (111) showing in-plane stacking faultsand dislocations. 750 ◦C, 800 MPa, 1% creep strain.
93
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.21: An anaglyph under condition of (111) showing in-plane stacking faultsand dislocations. 750 ◦C, 800 MPa, 1% creep strain.
94
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
cations under the (111) condition, while Burger’s vectors of ±1/6 [211] only satisfy the
invisibility condition under the (111) condition. To differentiate these two candidates,
the value of w is considered. As we can see, under the g-vector of (311), w has a value
which is larger than 1. Based on the criterion mentioned earlier, a scalar product of
+2/3 corresponds to a visibility condition, while -2/3 corresponds to invisibility. The
visibility of dislocation 1 at the condition of (311) suggests that the scalar product of
g9 and the Burger’s vector of dislocation 1 is +2/3. In this case, it can be concluded
that the Burger’s vector for dislocation 1 is +a/6 [112]. For dislocation 2, the analysis
follows the same process and the sign of the vector is deduced from the contrast of g9,
where the value of w is larger than 1. A scalar product of +4/3 indicates an invisibility
(or residual contrast) when w is larger than 1 and fits to all the contrast conditions.
This suggests a Burger’s vector of +a/3 [112].
The contrasts of dislocations 2 and 3 are the same at all the conditions except for g9
(311). Since w value for g9 is larger than 1, and it is clear that the change of sign
of scalar product will change the visibility correspondingly, an opposite sign for the
Burger’s vector of dislocation 3, i.e., +a/3 [112] will satisfy all the contrast conditions.
It is noteworthy that under g9, the contrasts for dislocations 2 and 3 are complementary
to each other.
Interface dislocations (d5 to d8) have been analyzed and three types of dislocations were
found. From the invisibility conditions, it can be seen that the dislocations are mainly of
〈110〉 type. The conventional effective visibility/invisibility criterion of g · b = 0 could
yield the type of dislocation while leaving the pre-factor undetermined. Although
LACBED [91–93] method has not been used, it is well-accepted that the interface
dislocations for Ni-base single crystal superalloys are of type a/2 〈110〉 [42, 90, 94–96].
Different types of dislocations indicate that there are different slip systems activated
which allow to deposit dislocation segments at the interface. Attention must be paid to
the fact that the two types of interface dislocations d5 (±a/2 [011]) and d6 (±a/2 [101])
provide the possibility to generate the [112] type of partial dislocations.
The analysis of in-plane stacking faults undergoes the same tilting and analysis pro-
cedure as described previously. The three stacking faults under investigation have
the same contrast. As combined with the orientation of the TEM foil, the in-plane
stacking faults should have a vector of ±a/3 [111]. It is difficult to determine the sign
of the vector. While for the inclined stacking faults, the sign can be determined by
the contrast of the first fringe. The conventional tilting analysis does not help to de-
termine the pre-factor of the fault vector. A pre-factor of a/3 is only determined by
taking the crystallographic information of the FCC structure into consideration. The
95
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
in-plane stacking fault investigation has certain advantages when one aims at inves-
tigating stacking faults which are related to partial dislocations. But it suffers from
the completely different contrast compared with inclined stacking faults, and the crite-
rion which help to determine inclined stacking faults cannot be applied to characterize
in-plane faults.
HRTEM Analysis
High resolution TEM was applied for the investigation of stacking faults. A TEM
specimen taken from a crept specimen after 5% deformation at 750 ◦C and 800 MPa is
used for HRTEM investigation. While TEM foils with [111] orientation show obvious
advantages in observing dislocation gliding behavior, a large angle of tilt is required
from 〈111〉 to 〈110〉 poles to get stacking faults edge-on such that HRTEM can be
performed. Using HRTEM analysis, both the nature of the stacking fault and a rough
estimation of its displacement vector can be achieved.
Figure 5.22 shows one example of a HRTEM analysis for an edge-on stacking fault.
In Figure 5.22(a), a few stacking faults are orientated edge-on inside one γ′ particle.
A small white rectangle indicates the location where higher magnification is applied,
Figure 5.22(b). From FFT in Figure 5.22(c), the ordered structure of the γ′ phase has
been confirmed by the observation of superlattice reflections. The long streaks in the
direction of [111] show clear evidence for the presence of stacking faults. They indicate
that the stacking faults lie in the plane of [111] with the direction of ± [112]. The
plane of the stacking faults can be further confirmed when the plane [111] is filtered
out, which is shown in the inset of Figure 5.22(d). The “twisted” region is the area of
the stacking fault.
The determination of the fault nature and vector can be seen in Figures 5.22(e) and
(f). In Figure 5.22(e), a normal FCC stacking sequence is constructed, where white
circles represent the “A”, red circles the “B” and green circles the “C” layers. The
stacking sequence is constructed in a normal way (ABCABC) until the stacking fault
is approached. An extra “C” layer has been found to fit the sequence. With this extra
“C” layer it can be concluded that the stacking fault is of extrinsic nature, according
to the definition of a SESF. The measurement of the shift has been demonstrated in
Figure 5.22(f). The white line indicates the normal position of atom columns. Due
to the introduction of stacking faults, the columns are shifted. This normal lattice
spacing shift associated with the stacking fault were 0.21 and 0.073 nm, respectively.
96
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Tab
le5.
5:R
esult
sfr
omST
EM
tilt
exp
erim
ents
(Fig
ure
5.19
)af
ter
1%cr
eep
stra
info
rin
-pla
ne
fault
wit
ha
sum
mar
yof
wva
lue
and
vis
ibilit
yco
ndit
ions.
“+”
indic
ates
vis
ibilit
y,“-
”in
dic
ates
invis
ibilit
yan
d“r
es”
indic
ates
resi
dual
vis
ibilit
y.
g1:(
111)
g2:(
202)
g3:(
200)
g4:(
111)
g5:(
022)
g6:(
111)
g7:(
131)
g8:(
220)
g9:(
311)
g10:(
111)
g11:(
113)
g12:(
002)
b/R
w0.
330.
320.
420.
940.
780.
500.
881.
031.
140.
501.
370.
80
d1
-(-
1/3)
+(-
1)-
(+1/
3)-(
+1/
3)+
(+1)
+(+
2/3)
res
(-2/
3)-
(0)
+(+
2/3)
-(-
1/3)
+(+
4/3)
+(-
2/3)
a/6
[112
]
d2
+(-
2/3)
+(-
2)+
(+2/
3)+
(+2/
3)+
(+2)
res
(+4/
3)re
s(-
4/3)
-(0
)re
s(+
4/3)
+(-
2/3)
+(+
8/3)
+(-
4/3)
a/3
[112
]
d3
+(+
2/3)
+(+
2)re
s(-
2/3)
res
(-2/
3)+
(-2)
+(-
4/3)
+(-
4/3)
-(0
)+
(-4/
3)+
(+2/
3)+
(-8/
3)re
s(+
4/3)
a/3
[112
]
d4
-(1
/3)
+(+
1)-
(-1/
3)-
(-1/
3)+
(-1)
+(-
2/3)
+(+
2/3)
-(0
)-
(-2/
3)-(
+1/
3)+
(-4/
3)+
(+2/
3)a/6
[112
]
d5
+(±
1)+
(±1)
-(0
)+
(±1)
+(±
2)+
(±1)
+(±
2)+
(±1)
-(0
)-
(0)
+(±
1)+
(±2)
±a/2
[011
]
d6
-(0
)+
(±2)
+(±
1)-
(0)
+(±
1)+
(±1)
-(0
)+
(±1)
+(±
2)+
(±1)
+(±
2)+
(±1)
±a/2
[101
]
d7
+(±
1)-
(0)
+(±
1)+
(±1)
+(±
1)-
(0)
res
(±1)
+(±
1)+
(±1)
-(0
)+
(±1)
+(±
1)±a/2
[101
]
d8
+(±
1)+
(±1)
-(0
)+
(±1)
+(±
2)+
(±1)
+(±
2)+
(±1)
-(0
)-
(0)
+(±
1)+
(±2)
±a/2
[011
]
f1+
(±1/
3)-
(0)
+(±
2/3)
+(±
1/3)
-(0
)+
(±1/
3)re
s(±
1/3)
-(0
)re
s(±
1/3)
+(±
1/3)
res
(±1/
3)+
(±2/
3)±a/3
[111
]
f2+
(±1/
3)-
(0)
+(±
2/3)
+(±
1/3)
-(0
)+
(±1/
3)re
s(±
1/3)
-(0
)re
s(±
1/3)
+(±
1/3)
res
(±1/
3)+
(±2/
3)±a/3
[111
]
f3+
(±1/
3)-
(0)
+(±
2/3)
+(±
1/3)
-(0
)+
(±1/
3)re
s(±
1/3)
-(0
)re
s(±
1/3)
+(±
1/3)
res
(±1/
3)+
(±2/
3)±a/3
[111
]
97
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
This shift is roughly 1/3 on the direction of [112]. Due to the limited accuracy of this
analysis, alternative methods should be used to further confirm this result.
98
CHAPTER 5. RESULTS
Figure 5.22: HRTEM analysis for stacking faults. (a) Edge-on stacking faults in alower magnification. (b) Higher magnification for stacking faults. (c) FFT. (d) FilteredHRTEM with an inset containing only one plane filtered. (e) Determination of faultsnature. (f). Determination for fault shift.
99
6. Discussion
6.1 On the need of further work to explain primary
creep
Low temperature and high stress creep investigation of Ni-base single crystal superal-
loys have been performed in the literatures (e.g., [37, 50, 51, 57, 97]). Regardless of
superalloy compositions and differences of temperature and stress conditions, double
minimum creep behavior has always been observed, for example, in Mar-M200 [37],
CMSX-4 and SRR 99 [50, 51, 57, 97]. However, there is no explanation of the reason
for this peculiar type of creep behavior. Thus, the present work is intended to shed
some light on this peculiar double minimum creep phenomenon.
In the low temperature and high stress regime, a large amount of primary creep strain
has been accumulated and observed. Moreover, γ′ cutting mechanism has been found to
be associated with {111}〈112〉 slip systems. Rae and Reed [51] have conducted a series
of experiments at different temperatures, stresses and orientations to figure out the
origin and mechanism of primary creep at a temperature range of 750 - 850 ◦C. They
concluded that three elementary process are involved in the high primary creep strain
accumulation observed at low temperature and high stress. First, 〈112〉 dislocation
ribbons must form by reactions of different a/2〈110〉 γ channel dislocations. Second, the
resolved shear stress (driving force) must be high enough for γ′ cutting to occur. Finally,
they point out that an optimum γ channel dislocation density must be established,
which is high enough to promote the reactions for the formation of 〈112〉 ribbons,
but at the same time, not too high to suppress all dislocations achieving by stress
work hardening interacts. Cutting of the γ′ particles by a single a/2〈110〉 dislocation
has also been observed, where superlattice intrinsic and extrinsic stacking faults were
reported to be involved [98]. While stacking faults have been commonly detected in the
101
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
low temperature regime, the appearance of stacking faults does not necessarily imply
a〈112〉 cutting mode: a detailed analysis with the associated dislocations is necessary
for the confirmation of the cutting mode. Kear et al. [37, 47] have conducted a series
of TEM analysis for detailed dislocation and stacking fault analysis. They confirmed
a cutting mechanism which is associated with a planar fault with a total displacement
vector of [112] on the (111) plane.
So far work on low temperature and high stress creep of the Ni-base single crystal
superalloys has mainly focused on the reasons for conventional primary creep. However,
as has been reported in the present work, a first local minimum precede the second
global minimum. This peculiar creep behavior is difficult to describe by simply using
the term primary, secondary and tertiary creep. Moreover, there is a need to explain
why the creep rate reaches an early local minimum by an intermediate maximum.
6.2 Composite character and stress transfer
The first local minimum is observed at 0.1% creep strain after creep of 30 minutes at
750 ◦C and 800 MPa. It is important to highlight that strain accumulation commences
immediately in all creep tests, as soon as the load is applied. In other words, no
incubation period has been observed in the present work for low temperature and high
stress creep, which is not consistent with what has been reported in previous work
[9, 37, 99]. It is also noteworthy that the durations of the incubation period in [9, 37]
are of the same order of the intervals required to reach stage II. Further investigation
is needed to clarify this point.
One part of the explanation of the first rate minimum (shown in Figure 5.1(b)) is
based on the macroscopic heterogeneity of Ni-base superalloys SX, which result from
the solidification process. Ni-base superalloys SX are produced in a Bridgeman type of
process, where dendrites grow into an undercooled melt. The dendrite structure of the
material used in the present work has been described elsewhere [14]. Most importantly
the average chemical compositions between prior dendritic and interdendritic regions
differ. As a result, dendritic regions have a lower γ′ volume fraction than interdendritic
regions [14]. It is therefore reasonable to assume that the interdendritic regions are
stronger than dendritic regions. This is schematically illustrated in the lower part
of Figure 6.1, which also shows that the average dendrite spacing is of the order of
500 µm. One can interpret the difference between dendritic and interdendritic regions
102
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
as a large scale microstructural heterogeneities. In fact, the material represents a
composite consisting of dendritic and interdendritic regions (center of Figure 6.1). The
mechanical analogon in the middle top of Figure 6.1 suggests, that dendritic regions
deform easier than interdendritic regions. As a consequence, there is a stress transfer
from dendritic to interdendritic regions. This stress transfer results in a decrease of
creep rate and may explain one part of the decrease of creep rate towards the first
minimum.
Figure 6.1 also suggests, that there is a smaller scale heterogeneity associated with the
γ/γ′ microstructure. This can also be thought of as a composite consisting of harder
(γ′ particles) and softer (γ channels) regions. There is also a stress transfer on this
smaller scale, as will be discussed later.
Classically, composite materials combine a soft matrix phase with a hard strengthening
phase. One class of the well-studied composite materials are fiber reinforced Al-alloy
metal matrix composites (MMCs) [100, 101], where the stress transfer mechanism from
softer to harder regions explains the decrease of primary creep. The situation of Ni-base
SX is different, where all available evidence suggests, that two softer phases combine to
form one stronger microstructure [8, 17, 102]. Bulk Ni3Al species are probably softer
than γ′ particles in SX-microstructure, because the latter are dislocation-free while bulk
materials contain dislocations. The key to understand the superior creep properties of
SXs lies in understanding the way to inject dislocations from the γ channels into the
ordered γ′ particles. This probably requires a critical stress. Similarities can be found
between threshold event between conventional MMCs and the γ/γ′ micro composite.
For short fiber reinforced Al-MMCs, fiber breakage didn’t occur immediately [100,
101]. However, stress transfer from the softer matrix phase to the fibers is required
and further deformation continues until the critical stress is reached. For Ni-base
single crystal superalloys with a γ/γ′ microstructure, cutting events are not observed
until stress transfer from plastically deformed γ channels to dislocation-free γ′ particles
occurs. At larger strains, the two phases deform in parallel and must accumulate similar
amounts of strain.
6.3 Exhaustion of grown-in misfit dislocations
An exhaustion mechanism is proposed as a second elementary process which contributes
to the first local minimum. This is related to the decrease of dislocation density in the
103
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
Figure 6.1: Composite character of SX Ni-base superalloys on two length scales. Center:Small differences between prior dendritic and interdendritic regions. Left and right:Micro composites with slightly higher (left: ID) and slightly lower (right: D) γ′-volumefractions.
104
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
vertical γ channels. A simplified dislocation model has been introduced in Figure 6.2.
In Figure 6.2(a), there are two slip systems, as indicated by the two crossed dashed lines.
When an external tensile stress is applied (shown by two vertical arrows), dislocations
move along slip planes, as depicted by the small arrows. The “+” and “-” symbols
next to dislocation at the lower right of Figure 6.2(a) indicate that in addition to the
external stress (large vertical arrows), there are local strain fields around dislocations.
In case of an edge dislocation, there can be positive (+) and negative (-). Here 60◦
interface dislocations are important, which behave like edge dislocations with respect
to the presence of compressive and tensile stress states which surround them.
The established dislocation model is accommodated to misfit dislocations in the γ/γ′
microstructure. Figures 6.2(b) to (d) schematically show a 2D projection of four γ′
particles and a γ channel crossing. As mentioned in the background section, the Ni-
base single crystal superalloy investigated in the present work has a negative misfit.
Consequently, the γ′ phase, with a smaller lattice constant, undergoes tension while the
γ phase, with a larger lattice constant, undergoes compression. The two long arrows
indicate misfit stress state inside of the microstructure. This internal misfit stresses
attract dislocations to the interfaces of the γ/γ′ microstructure, as can be seen in Fig-
ure 6.2(b). The misfit stress can be as high as 500 MPa [9, 103]. Dislocations are
accommodated in such a way that the compressive/tensile stress state of dislocations
are directed towards tensile/compressive stress state of the γ/γ′ microstructure. When
a high external stress is applied, as shown in Figures 6.2(c) and (d), dislocations move
in the direction defined in Figure 6.2(a). Dislocations in horizontal channels are pushed
toward the interfaces. On the contrary, dislocations in the vertical channels are pulled
away. After a short glide time, dislocations move towards the center of the vertical γ
channels where they annihilate, as indicated in Figure 6.2(d). The corresponding con-
sequence for the different ways of movement for dislocations in horizontal and vertical
channels is that the mobile dislocation density in vertical channels is decreasing. The
early decrease of the density of in-grown dislocations contributes to the decrease of
creep rate. It represents an exhaustion mechanism. As already mentioned by Leverant
and Kear [37], the density of in-grown dislocations plays an important role in the early
stages of creep.
105
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
Figure 6.2: Misfit dislocation model. (a) Dislocations in two slip systems. (b) 2D pro-jection of γ/γ′ model system with misfit dislocations. (c) Reaction of misfit dislocationsto applied load. (d) Annihilation of misfit dislocations in vertical channels.
106
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
6.4 Interpretation of glide of grown dislocation
There is a third mechanism which contributes to the decrease towards the first creep
rate minimum. As can be seen from both SEM and TEM images (e.g., Figures 5.3
and 5.6), the morphology of the γ′ phase is in general cuboidal, but the γ′ cubic
edge length reveals some scatter. More importantly, the γ′ cubes are not regularly
arranged as is often assumed. The dashed line in Figures 5.3(a) and (b) show free γ
channel segments which end at a location where an irregularly positioned γ′ particle is
present. This is the basis of a third mechanism which probably contribute to the early
first local creep rate minimum. This deformation process involves immediate glide
of pre-existing dislocations through continuous parts of the channel network. These
gliding process are interrupted when dislocation segments run into irregularly located
γ′ particles, as can be seen in several locations in Figures 5.5, 5.6 and 5.7. This has
been referred to as run and stop mechanism. The interruptions of dislocation glide
also contribute to the first local creep rate minimum. It should be noted that this
mechanism cannot be rationalized when the presence of in-grown dislocations is not
considered or when a highly regular spatial arrangement of the high asymmetry of γ′
particles in the γ/γ′ microstructure is assumed, as in most micromechanical models
[104–106]. At high temperatures and low stresses regimes, there is no intermediate
minimum observed [18, 42, 84, 94]. Peach-Koehler stresses are not high enough to
pull in-grown misfit dislocations away from the γ/γ′ interfaces. Furthermore, climbing
processes at higher temperatures make it easier for dislocations to overcome constraints
imposed by crystallographic slip or microstructural irregularities.
6.5 Time spent at the first local minimum
The time needed to pass the first local minimum (the duration of stage I) is of the order
of 30 minutes. It is worth highlighting that this time needed to overcome the first creep
rate minimum does not represent an incubation period, where no strain accumulates.
Leverant and Kear [37] interpreted this period as an incubation time which is needed to
produce dislocations. They did not observe such an incubation period after introducing
a high dislocation density by applying shock waves. Pollock and Argon in their well-
cited paper [9] suggested that dislocations emanate from ingrown nests which act as
dislocation sources during the incubation period. The TEM montages of the present
work, e.g., Figures 5.5 and 5.7, suggest that the increase of dislocation density can
also be associated with local sources. Ram et al. in their recent paper [107] explicitly
investigated and explained the main sources for creep dislocations by using high angular
107
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
resolution electron back scatter diffraction (HR EBSD), electron channelling contrast
imaging (ECCI) under controlled diffraction conditions. The main message from the
investigation is that the main sources for creep dislocations are individual, isolated
dislocations rather than low-angle boundaries. Their work is consistent with the TEM
results retrieved from the montages in the present work.
The time spent at the first local minimum suggests that diffusion is involved. It is
reasonable to assume that dislocations can climb in vertical γ channels to reach the
next horizontal γ channel, where glide can be resumed.
To prove this hypothesis, a dislocation climb process which takes about 30 minutes
is considered. A relevant diffusion distance is related to a fraction of the γ′ size, for
example, 0.2× 10−6m. The diffusion coefficient D can be approximated using the well-
known equation:
X2 = 4 ·D · t (6.1)
where X is the diffusion distance and t is the diffusion time. By applying the aforemen-
tioned value, a diffusion coefficient of 0.6× 10−17m2 s−1 is obtained. This is consistent
with the values of diffusion coefficients for relevant d-shell elements in Ni [3, 108]. Due
to the multi-element composition of Ni-base single crystal superalloys, it cannot be
expected that the calculated diffusion coefficient fully matches the Ni-data which are
reported in the literature. However, the rough estimation suggests that the time spent
at the first local minimum is related to short range diffusion processes which govern
dislocation climb.
6.6 Observation for intermediate local maximum
In stage II, as defined in Figure 5.1(c), the strain rate increases to a local intermediate
maximum. Several other researchers have also observed this early increase of creep rate
[50, 51, 97, 109–112]. From the overview of the SEM image (Figure 5.3) and montage
images (Figures 5.6, 5.7 and 5.8) we can see that the increase of creep rate is not related
to rafting of the microstructure. On the other hand, the quantitative results presented
in Figures 5.12 and 5.13 clearly show that the increase of creep rate in stage II of DM-
creep is associated with the increase of dislocation densities and planar faults densities.
The results show that up to 1% strain, dislocation densities reach a peak value in the
interrupted creep experiments. More dislocations offer more sources for the formation
108
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
of stacking faults. Thus, the amount of stacking faults seems to reach a maximum
value as well. This may indicate that there is an optimum condition for the formation
of stacking faults and this optimum condition has been referred to as “the opening of
Rae window”, since Pollock et al. have summarized this condition from the work of
Rae [50, 51] and describe it as a window of opportunity for the formation of stacking
faults [8]. As there are more dislocations in γ channels, there are more sources for
dislocation reactions which can provide for the formation of 〈112〉 type of dislocations
for further γ′ particle shearing. Both dislocations and stacking faults contribute to the
intermediate maximum of strain rate.
At this stage, it is necessary to discuss two main types of stacking faults shearing
mechanisms from dislocations in the γ channel phase. Several authors have proposed
that a〈112〉 dislocation ribbons shear the γ′ phase [47, 49–53, 113]. One possible
mechanism can be seen from Equations 6.2 to 6.4. Two different channel dislocations
react and form a 〈112〉 dislocation, as described in Equation 6.2.
a/2[101] + a/2[011]→ a/2[112] (6.2)
The resulting a/2[112] can further decompose into two partial dislocations, as shown
in Equation 6.3:
a/2[112]→ a/3[112] + SISF + a/6[112] (6.3)
For the ordered γ′ phase, a dislocation with a Burger’s vector of a/3[112] is able to cut
into γ′ phase and generates a SISF while the trailing dislocation a/6[112] cannot enter
the γ′ phase and remains at the γ/γ′ interface.
A second pair of channel dislocations is needed for the formation of a/2[112] disloca-
tions which eventually can decompose into a/3[112] and a/6[112] with the generation
of a SESF, indicated in Equation 6.4:
a/2[112]→ a/3[112] + SESF + a/6[112] (6.4)
The newly generated a/6[112] can then jointly enter γ′ together with the former
a/6[112] left at the interface, when the driving force is high enough. Meanwhile, it
is unavoidable to form an anti-phase boundary between these two dislocations, and a
109
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
SISF/APB/SESF ribbon is formed.
A second type of stacking fault shear involves one single a/2[110] dislocation cutting
event. One a/2[110] dislocation cuts into the γ′ phase and creates an APB [98]. In a
second step, the a/2[110] dislocation further dissociates into two types of [112] disloca-
tions, as assumed in Equation 6.5, and generates a SISF. The APB area is eventually
consumed by the SISF and the low energy SISF remains.
a/2[101]→ a/3[211] + SISF + a/6[121] (6.5)
Regarding the results and the scope of the present work, it is clear that both SISF and
SESF have been observed. It seems that both types of stacking faults shearing mech-
anisms are related and it is difficult to conclude which mechanism is dominant. Apart
from the formation of SISF and SESF, under certain conditions, complex stacking faults
and deformation twins have also been reported as alternative γ′ cutting mechanisms
[113]. While it is clear that the increase of strain rate at stage II is closely related
to stacking fault cutting, further work is needed to clarify the displacement vectors of
stacking faults. This can help to differentiate between these two types of mechanisms.
6.7 Strain hardening: towards a global minimum
After an intermediate maximum at 1%, the creep rate starts to decrease towards a
global minimum. The decrease of strain rate in stage III of double minimum creep
coincides with the closure of the “Rae window”, i.e., the condition for stacking fault
shear is not optimum anymore. The overall dislocation density keeps the increasing
trend till 5%, which is consistent with the montage image in Figure 5.11. By comparison
with the montage image at 0.4% (Figure 5.8), it can be seen that at 0.4% strain only one
direction of the γ channel is full of dislocations while in other directions dislocation
densities are low. The dashed line indicates a horizontal channel where dislocation
density is highest among three directions of channels. As a striking contrast, at 5%
strain, all three directions of γ channels have been full of dislocations. Dislocations
cannot enter all channels by glide since there are interrupted movements of dislocations
by irregularly spaced γ′ particles, as shown in Figures 5.3, 5.7 and 6.4. It is plausible
to conclude that stacking fault shear is an alternative mechanism, which accounts for
the increase of dislocation density in channels with unfavourable stress states. As the
110
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
relative empty channels (the channels receiving dislocations) fill up with dislocations
(initiated by dislocations from sources in horizontal channels), back stresses build up
and there is increasing difficulty to inject more dislocations into the receiving channels,
whether it is by dislocation glide or by stacking fault shear.
To sum up, the decrease of creep rate in stage III can be rationalized by three factors.
First, it is the closure of Rae window. The condition for dislocation and stacking faults
is not optimum. It depends on interactions between source channel dislocations and
the formation of low energy networks, for interfacial dislocation segments stabilization.
Second, back stresses build up in the receiving channels and it is more difficult for
dislocations to move to the relatively empty channels. Last but not least, it is also
reasonable to assume that the inherent resistance for stacking fault shear in γ′ particles
increases, which could be related to chemical changes on the nanoscale [114–117] and
the increase of dislocation density in the γ′ particles.
6.8 Local TEM observations
Initial state
From the STEM images of initial state in Figure 5.2 and the STEM HAADF image in
Figure 6.3, tiny γ particles can be clearly observed inside of the γ′ cubes, as highlighted
in Figure 6.3 by the white dashed circles. A recent paper by Yardley et al. [118] has
specifically combined thermodynamic calculations with characterization to explain the
formation of γ particles inside of the γ′ cubes. Their calculation indicates that a change
of volume fraction and chemical compositions at a high-temperature thermodynamic
equilibrium leads to a reestablishment at low-temperature equilibrium. To be more
specific, at the high-temperature equilibrium, heavy elements such as Re, Co and Cr
diffuse into the γ′ cubes [118]. When it comes to a lower temperature, these heavy
elements are not able to diffuse back to the γ channel phase and at the same time they
cannot be accommodated in the γ′ particles. As a consequence, tiny γ particles form
inside of γ′ cubes and accommodates the heavy elements [118].
On the other hand, secondary γ′ particles have been observed inside of γ channels. The
formation of secondary γ′ particles inside the γ phase can result from precipitation from
an oversaturated solid solution during cooling from higher temperatures. Secondary γ′
111
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
particles have been a prominent feature associated with grooves and ledges at the γ/γ′
interface of Ni-base single crystal superalloy [90]. Xiang et al. have conducted more
detailed work regarding secondary γ′ particles in γ matrix phase and at the dislocation
nodes [119]. They found out these two kinds of secondary γ′ particles differ in size,
morphology and element composition [119].
Creep state
In Figure 6.4, there are four local TEM observations at different stages of deformation.
Figure 6.4(a) shows dislocation movement in γ channels after 0.2% creep strain. The
dashed line indicates horizontal channel direction, as for the [001]-oriented sample.
Figure 6.4(a) further confirms the run and stop mechanism. As highlighted by two
white arrows, 1 and 2, we can see that dislocations make an attempt to enter non-
horizontal γ channels but it is not successful. Local stresses can be estimated by
approximating semicircles of leading dislocations and measuring the radii. The radii
of the two dislocation tips have been estimated to be 27 nm and 55 nm for dislocation
tips 1 and 2 respectively.
Local Orowan stresses have been calculated using the following well-known Orowan
Equation 6.6:
τor = 0.8 · µ · b/d (6.6)
Where µ is the shear modulus and b is Burger’s vector and d the diameter of the
dislocation loop.
Elastic constants of the ERBO/1 Ni-base single crystal superalloy were widely inves-
tigated at different temperatures for different orientations [120]. A value of 100 GPa
has been estimated for shear modulus for 750 ◦C and [001]-oriented specimen, and the
magnitude for Burger’s vector is taken as 0.254 nm. For dislocation 1, with a radius of
27 nm and a diameter of 54 nm, the calculated Orowan stress τor H is around 376 MPa.
Since dislocation 1 is in horizontal channel, it is also necessary to calculate the stress in
horizontal channel. The total applied stress in the whole experiment series is 800 MPa,
with a Schmidt factor of 0.408, the applied horizontal stress τapp H is 326 MPa. In
addition, horizontal misfit stress has also to be taken into consideration, which has
supposed to be 50 MPa, and the horizontal applied misfit stress τmis H is 20 MPa. In
this case, horizontal channel stress is the sum up of applied stress τapp H and misfit
112
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
Figure 6.3: STEM HAADF image showing microstructure of ERBO/1 at the initialstate, the dashed circles highlight tiny γ phases inside of the γ′ particles. Courtesy ofDr. A. Parsa, same specimen as in [118].
113
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
stress τmis H , which is 346 MPa. It is clear that the horizontal stress (346 MPa) is not
high enough to overcome the Orowan stress (376 MPa), and dislocation is not able to
move further.
In the case of “vertical” channel (as opposed to horizontal channel), the Orowan stress
and vertical channel stress have been calculated in the similar way. The vertical Orowan
stress has calculated to be 185 MPa but the vertical channel stress is only 126 MPa.
Both horizontal and vertical stresses have been estimated to be not high enough to
supress Orowan stress. This has been the reason why the dislocation loops cannot
expand into the two highlighted locations.
In Figure 6.4(b), a full white circle indicates an irregularly placed γ′ particle imped-
ing the continuous dislocation glide between the upper and lower part of γ channels,
marked by two arrows pointing up and down respectively. It can also be seen that
there are dislocations that succeed to circumvent blocking particles by expanding into
non-horizontal channels. At this creep strain stage, dislocation activities are restricted
in the γ channels. When the creep strain increases to 1%, as documented in Fig-
ure 6.4(c), dislocations can be observed inside of γ′ particles, as highlighted by two
white arrows. When creep strain increases further to 5% (Figure 6.4(d)), two relevant
microstructural features have been observed: (i) Dislocation densities in γ channels
increased significantly. Compared with early stages, dislocation density has increased
in a significant way. (ii) γ′ particles are sheared by both dislocations (marked by the
arrow pointing to the lower left) and stacking faults (marked by the arrow pointing to
the upper left).
114
CHAPTER 6. DISCUSSION
Figure 6.4: TEM micrographs of dislocation events. (a) Dislocation expanding alongγ -channel in (111) plane of TEM foil - 0.2% strain. (b) Irregularly located γ′-particlesimpede dislocation motion - 0.2% strain. (c) γ′-phase cutting by dislocations - 1%strain. (d) High dislocation densities in all γ-channels after 5% strain. Central γ′-particle contains planar faults and dislocations.
115
7. Summary and Conclusions
The present work aims to contribute to a better understanding of the elementary
processes that govern low temperature and high stress creep (750 ◦C and 800 MPa)
of precisely [001] oriented (±1◦) single crystal Ni-base superalloy tensile specimens.
Special emphasis was placed on the evolution of creep rates during creep and quantifi-
cation of corresponding microstructures and defects related to plasticity. A set of six
interrupted creep specimens, which were interrupted after strains between 0.1% to 5%
and microstructures were evaluated using diffraction contrast transmission electron mi-
croscopy. The results of the present work are summarized and a number of conclusions
are drawn:
(1). Low temperature and high stress creep always starts as soon as the load is applied.
No incubation periods of creep have been observed. This is not in line with results
reported in the literature, and further work is required to clarify this point. Creep
results in present work suggest that the details of the loading procedure are critically
important. Most probably a step-wise loading procedure used in present work does
not allow to document the processes. When studying early creep phenomena it is
important to document the heating/loading procedure precisely. Without this kind of
information it is difficult to compare with creep results from previous researches.
(2). During high temperature and low stress creep, double minimum creep behavior has
been confirmed and reproduced. There is a first sharp decrease of creep rate towards
a first local minimum (0.1% strain, 30 minutes). This result confirms mechanical
data which were published by researchers from the University of Erlangen (Schneider
et al., Superalloy Conference 1992). Then creep rates pass through an intermediate
maximum (1%, 1.5 hours). Then creep rates decrease towards a global minimum after
260 hours (corresponding to 5%). Finally creep rates increase towards final rupture
(not investigated in the present work).
117
CHAPTER 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
(3). Classical creep concepts do not allow addressing this type of creep behavior. In
the classical picture of creep of materials there is one decrease of creep rate due to
an increase of back stress. A secondary or steady state creep regime characterizes
a scenario where an increase of dislocation density (strain hardening) is balanced by
a decrease of dislocation density (dynamic recovery). Finally tertiary creep accounts
for softening and damage processes. Clearly, this traditional way of viewing a creep
process is not suitable to rationalize DM-creep. Current engineering definitions of
primary creep incorporate the stages I (decrease to first local creep rate minimum) and
stage II (increase towards an intermediate creep rate maximum) of DM creep. In the
present work it is outlined why this definition of primary creep requires refinement.
(4). Even though considerable scatter is shown, the microstructural results obtained in
the present work do allow interpretation of DM creep. The good quantitative metal-
lographic results obtained in the present work rely on five boundary conditions. First,
the tensile creep specimens which were investigated in the present work were precisely
oriented. Second, the TEM foils were cut out parallel to {111} planes. This allows
obtaining TEM foils which contain long dislocation segments. Third, it is important
to study TEM foils with thicknesses larger than 150 nm. Only such TEM foils allow
characterization of relevant features of the dislocation substructure. Thinner TEM
foils are less suitable in this respect. Fourth, it is important to characterize sufficiently
large regions to obtain statistically relevant information on elementary deformation
mechanisms. For this purpose, montages of TEM micrographs were produced, which
contained 100 or more γ′ particles. And finally, it is important to establish well-defined
contrast conditions.
(5). The present work applies well-established methods like Ham’s method and the
effective invisibility approach to measure/identify dislocation densities and the Burger’s
vectors of dislocations. In order to quantify the density of planar faults, an intensity
parameter was developed, which gives fair credit to such planar faults which are fully
contained in the TEM foil, because their fault plane is parallel to TEM foil normal and
others which intersect the TEM foil in an angle. With the help of this parameter it
was possible to quantitatively describe the opening and the closing of the Rae window,
which qualitatively describes the transient from stage I to stage III of DM-creep.
(6). An important result obtained in the present work is related to the fact that
dislocation plasticity in γ -channels always precedes stacking fault shear of γ′-particles.
The γ/γ′-microstructure represents a composite where stresses are transferred from
the softer γ-channels to the harder γ′-particles via dislocations. The deposition of
dislocations at γ/γ′-interfaces or the sudden interruption of dislocation movements
118
CHAPTER 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
by irregularly positioned γ′-particles represent microscopic stress transfer processes.
Stacking faults represent dislocation ribbons. The presence of a stacking fault indicates
that a group of dislocations jointly shears an ordered lattice. The results obtained in the
present work strongly suggest, that stacking faults should not be considered as planar
defects which operate on their own. They are always linked to dislocation plasticity.
(7). The present work interprets stage I of DM creep (decrease of creep rate towards
an early local minimum) on the basis of three elementary deformation processes. First,
an exhaustion mechanism, where the high external stresses which govern low tempera-
ture and high stress creep, pull misfit dislocations away from γ/γ′-interfaces. This first
mechanism represents an interpretation, which requires further validation by additional
experiments. Second, a run and stop mechanism, where favorably oriented dislocation
segments start to glide along open γ-channels before they hit irregularly positioned γ′-
particles. The present work provides direct TEM evidence for this second mechanism.
And finally the present work suggests, that a larger scale stress transfer from interden-
dritic (higher γ′ volume fraction) to dendritic regions (lower γ′ volume fractions) also
contributes to the decrease of deformation rate in the early stages of creep. The fact
that these two regions have different strengths was concluded from experimental and
theoretical results, which showed that interdendritic regions contain higher γ′-volume
fractions than dendritic regions. Although this appears to be reasonable, further work
is required to validate this conclusion.
(8). The increase of creep rate from the first local minimum towards the intermediate
maximum (stage II of DM-creep) is characterized by an increase of overall dislocation
density in the γ-channels and an increase of the density of planar faults in the γ′-
particles. During stage I a dislocation scenario evolves in the γ-channels, which provides
optimum conditions for γ′-particle cutting. There are enough dislocations available to
form the type of dislocation pairs which are required for cutting. The γ′-particles
still have perfect lattices and no obstacles hamper the movement of planar faults.
And the receiving γ-channels, on the other side of the γ′-particle are empty and can
accommodate dislocations. In the present work quantitative data are presented which
fully support this scenario. The situation was qualitatively described previously by
Rae et al. (MSEA, 2001) and was referred to as “opening of the Rae window”.
(9). The decrease of creep rate in stage III of DM-creep is governed by several ele-
mentary processes. There is normal strain hardening in the γ-phase. The dislocation
density in the receiving γ channels is so high that they can no longer integrate new
dislocations which arrive by either hampered channel glide or by delayed stacking fault
shear. Stacking fault shear itself can become more difficult, because dislocations strain
119
CHAPTER 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
harden the γ′-phase. Moreover, the stabilization of interface dislocation networks and
atomic re-ordering processes may slow down stacking fault shear.
(10) The current work provides some insights into the physical nature of the process
by which dislocations from the γ channels manage to penetrate and move through the
γ′ particles. Diffraction contrast TEM analysis has proved a number of points. First,
most γ channel dislocations which we observed are of a/2〈110〉 type. Dislocation reac-
tions between such γ channel dislocations lead to the formation of planar faults in the
γ′ phases with overall displacement vector of 〈112〉. This finding is in agreement with
those of the previous work accepted in the literature. It seems likely that the dissoci-
ation of γ channel dislocation into a/6〈112〉 types precedes all cutting events. Further
work is required to clarify this hypothesis, which so far could not be experimentally
observed.
120
CHAPTER 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
Further work and outlook
Results obtained in the present work indicate that systematic and careful quantifica-
tion of microstructures and associated defects enable to explain the double minimum
creep behavior observed at LTHS regime. There are situations where no direct mi-
crostructural observation is available, while there are cases when no certain conclusion
about stacking fault displacement vectors or the interaction between dislocation and
stacking faults can be reached. The following points can be suggested for further work
in this field:
(1) With regard to the accurate determination (both sign and magnitude) for inclined
and in-plane stacking faults, conventional TEM with a plus and minus g-vector con-
ditions can be applied. For certain TEM samples (with appropriate foil thickness),
LACBED can be applied.
(2) Correlative TEM/APT experiments shall be conducted to evaluate the influence of
elements segregating into the planar faults and associated change of the SF energy.
(3) A further correlative simulation work (calculation of SF energy) can be compared
with experimental results. The change of SF energy may play a significant role in
determining deformation mechanism.
(4) Double shear creep experiments can be employed to activate a precisely selected
single slip system, contributing to a better understanding of double minimum creep
behavior at low temperature and high stress regime.
(5) New insight for alloy design can be obtained, based on the influence of elements
upon creep behavior. As most of the creep life is in secondary creep region, a high
primary creep strain is detrimental to the material in the respect of creep life. Certain
elements which can avoid large primary strain is more beneficial to the material.
121
References
[1] G. Meetham (Ed.), Development of gas turbine materials, Applied Science Pub-
lishers, London, 1981.
[2] M. McLean, Directionally solidified materials for high temperature service, Met-
als Society, London, 1983.
[3] R. C. Reed, The superalloys: fundamentals and applications, Cambridge univer-
sity press, Cambridge, 2006.
[4] R. Burgel, H. J. Maier, T. Niendorf, Handbuch Hochtemperatur-
Werkstofftechnik, Vieweg and Teubner, Wiesbaden, 2011.
[5] I. Lopez-Galilea, J. Koßmann, A. Kostka, R. Drautz, L. M. Roncery, T. Hammer-
schmidt, S. Huth, W. Theisen, The thermal stability of topologically close-packed
phases in the single-crystal Ni-base superalloy ERBO/1, J. Mater. Sci. 51 (2016)
2653–2664.
[6] A. C. Yeh, A. Sato, T. Kobayashi, H. Harada, On the creep and phase stability
of advanced Ni-base single crystal superalloys, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 490 (2008)
445–451.
[7] T. Pollock, S. Tin, Nickel-based superalloys for advanced turbine engines: chem-
istry, microstructure and properties, J. Propul. Power. 22 (2006) 361–374.
[8] T. Pollock, R. Field, Dislocations in Solides, volume 11, Elsevier, 2002, pp. 547–
618.
[9] T. Pollock, A. Argon, Creep resistance of CMSX-3 nickel base superalloy single
crystals, Acta Metall. Mater. 40 (1992) 1–30.
[10] S. Copley, B. Kear, Temperature and orientation dependence of the flow stress
in off-stoichiometric Ni3 Al/γ′ phase, Trans. AIME 239 (1967) 977–984.
[11] V. Vitek, D. Pope, J. Bassani, Dislocations in Solides, volume 10, Elsevier, 1996,
pp. 135–185.
123
REFERENCES
[12] M. Durand-Charre, The microstructure of superalloys, Gordon and Breach, Am-
sterdam, 1997.
[13] T. Murakumo, T. Kobayashi, Y. Koizumi, H. Harada, Creep behaviour of Ni-
base single-crystal superalloys with various γ′ volume fraction, Acta Mater. 52
(2004) 3737 – 3744.
[14] A. B. Parsa, P. Wollgramm, H. Buck, C. Somsen, A. Kostka, I. Povstugar, P.-P.
Choi, D. Raabe, A. Dlouhy, J. Muller, et al., Advanced scale bridging microstruc-
ture analysis of single crystal Ni-Base superalloys, Adv. Eng. Mater. 17 (2015)
216–230.
[15] A. B. Parsa, The role of dislocations in the microstructural evolution during
creep of single crystal superalloys with γ/γ′ microstructure, Ph.D. thesis, Ruhr
University Bochum, 2015.
[16] M. E. Kassner, Fundamentals of creep in metals and alloys, Elsevier, Amsterdam,
2008.
[17] F. R. N. Nabarro, F. De Villiers, The Physics of creep, Taylor and Francis,
London, 1995.
[18] P. Wollgramm, H. Buck, K. Neuking, A. Parsa, S. Schuwalow, J. Rogal,
R. Drautz, G. Eggeler, On the role of Re in the stress and temperature de-
pendence of creep of Ni-base single crystal superalloys, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 628
(2015) 382–395.
[19] R. W. Evans, B. Wilshire, Creep of metals and alloys, The Institute of Metals,
London, 1985.
[20] J. Cadek, Creep in metallic materials, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.
[21] F. Garofalo, Fundamentals of creep and creep-rupture in metals, Macmillan, New
York, 1965.
[22] J. P. Poirier, Creep of crystals: high-temperature deformation processes in met-
als, ceramics and minerals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1985.
[23] W. Nix, B. Ilschner, Mechanisms controlling creep of single phase metals and
alloys, in: Strength of Metals and Alloys, Procedings of ICSMA 5, Pergamon
Press, Oxford, 1980, pp. 1503–1530.
[24] G. Kaustrater, B. Skrotzki, G. Eggeler, On the role of matrix creep in the high
temperature deformation of short fiber reinforced aluminum alloys, Mater. Sci.
Eng.: A 319 (2001) 716–720.
124
REFERENCES
[25] J. Cadek, H. Oikawa, V. Sustek, Threshold creep behaviour of discontinuous
aluminium and aluminium alloy matrix composites: an overview, Mater. Sci.
Eng.: A 190 (1995) 9–23.
[26] Y. Li, T. G. Langdon, A comparison of the creep properties of an Al-6092
composite and the unreinforced matrix alloy, Metall. Mater.Trans. A 29 (1998)
2523–2531.
[27] A. Epishin, T. Link, U. Bruckner, P. Portella, Kinetics of the topological inversion
of the γ/γ′-microstructure during creep of a nickel-based superalloy, Acta Mater.
49 (2001) 4017–4023.
[28] M. Ott, H. Mughrabi, Dependence of the high-temperature low-cycle fatigue
behaviour of the monocrystalline nickel-base superalloys CMSX-4 and CMSX-6
on the γ/γ′-morphology, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 272 (1999) 24–30.
[29] T. Pollock, A. Argon, Directional coarsening in nickel-base single crystals with
high volume fractions of coherent precipitates, Acta Metall. Mater. 42 (1994)
1859–1874.
[30] L. Carroll, Q. Feng, J. Mansfield, T. Pollock, Elemental partitioning in Ru-
containing Nickel-base single crystal superalloys, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 457 (2007)
292–299.
[31] R. Reed, N. Matan, D. Cox, M. Rist, C. Rae, Creep of CMSX-4 superalloy single
crystals: effects of rafting at high temperature, Acta Mater. 47 (1999) 3367–3381.
[32] A. Epishin, T. Link, Mechanisms of high-temperature creep of Nickel-based
superalloys under low applied stresses, Philos. Mag. 84 (2004) 1979–2000.
[33] R. Williams, Origin of strengthening on precipitation: ordered particles, Acta
Metall. 5 (1957) 241–244.
[34] H. Gleiter, E. Hornbogen, Aushartung durch hoharente geordnete teilchen, Acta
Metall. 13 (1965) 576–578.
[35] H. Gleiter, E. Hornbogen, Theorie der Wechselwirkung von Versetzungen mit
koharenten geordneten Zonen (I), Phys. Stat. Soll.(b) 12 (1965) 235–250.
[36] H. Gleiter, E. Hornbogen, Beobachtung der Wechselwirkung von Versetzungen
mit koharenten geordneten Zonen (II), Phys. Stat. Soll.(b) 12 (1965) 251–264.
[37] G. R. Leverant, B. H. Kear, The mechanism of creep in gamma prime
precipitation-hardened nickel-base alloys at intermediate temperatures, Metall.
Mater. Trans. B 1 (1970) 491–498.
125
REFERENCES
[38] G. Leverant, B. Kear, J. Oblak, Creep of precipitation-hardened nickel-base alloy
single crystals at high temperatures, Metall. Trans. 4 (1973) 355–362.
[39] A. Kostka, G. Malzer, G. Eggeler, High-temperature dislocation plasticity in the
single-crystal superalloy LEK94, J. Microsc. 223 (2006) 295–297.
[40] R. Srinivasan, G. Eggeler, M. Mills, γ′-cutting as rate-controlling recovery process
during high-temperature and low-stress creep of superalloy single crystals, Acta
Mater. 48 (2000) 4867–4878.
[41] G. Eggeler, A. Dlouhy, On the formation of 〈010〉 -dislocations in the γ′-phase of
superalloy single crystals during high temperature low stress creep, Acta Mater.
45 (1997) 4251–4262.
[42] L. A. Jacome, P. Nortershauser, J.-K. Heyer, A. Lahni, J. Frenzel, A. Dlouhy,
C. Somsen, G. Eggeler, High-temperature and low-stress creep anisotropy of
single-crystal superalloys, Acta Mater. 61 (2013) 2926–2943.
[43] H. Murakami, T. Yamagata, H. Harada, M. Yamazaki, The influence of Co on
creep deformation anisotropy in Ni-base single crystal superalloys at intermediate
temperatures, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 223 (1997) 54–58.
[44] G. Viswanathan, P. Sarosi, M. Henry, D. Whitis, W. Milligan, M. Mills, Inves-
tigation of creep deformation mechanisms at intermediate temperatures in Rene
88 DT, Acta Mater. 53 (2005) 3041–3057.
[45] R. Hobbs, L. Zhang, C. Rae, S. Tin, The effect of ruthenium on the intermediate
to high temperature creep response of high refractory content single crystal nickel-
base superalloys, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 489 (2008) 65–76.
[46] T. Pollock, A. Argon, Intermediate temperature creep deformation in CMSX-3
single crystals, in: Superalloys 1988, TMS Warrendale, 1988, p. 285.
[47] B. Kear, G. Leverant, J. Oblak, An analysis of creep induced intrinsic/extrinsic
fault pairs in a precipitation hardened nickel-base creep, Amer. Soc. Met. 62
(1969) 639–650.
[48] B. H. Kear, J. M. Oblak, A. F. Giamei, Stacking faults in gamma prime Ni3(Al,
Ti) precipitation hardened nickel-base alloys, Metall. Trans. 1 (1970) 2477–2486.
[49] C. Rae, M. Rist, D. Cox, R. Reed, N. Matan, On the primary creep of CMSX-4
superalloy single crystals, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 31 (2000) 2219–2228.
126
REFERENCES
[50] C. Rae, N. Matan, R. Reed, The role of stacking fault shear in the primary creep
of [001]-oriented single crystal superalloys at 750 ◦C and 750 MPa, Mater. Sci.
Eng.: A 300 (2001) 125–134.
[51] C. Rae, R. Reed, Primary creep in single crystal superalloys: origins, mechanisms
and effects, Acta Mater. 55 (2007) 1067–1081.
[52] Q. Chen, D. Knowles, Mechanism of 〈112〉 /3 slip initiation and anisotropy of γ′
phase in CMSX-4 during creep at 750 ◦C and 750 MPa, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 356
(2003) 352–367.
[53] D. Knowles, S. Gunturi, The role of 〈112〉{111} slip in the asymmetric nature
of creep of single crystal superalloy CMSX-4, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 328 (2002)
223–237.
[54] J. Sun, C. Lee, J. Lai, J. Wu, Dislocation dissociations and fault energies in
Ni3Al alloys doped with palladium, Intermetallics 7 (1999) 1329–1335.
[55] G. Viswanathan, R. Shi, A. Genc, V. Vorontsov, L. Kovarik, C. Rae, M. Mills,
Segregation at stacking faults within the γ′ phase of two Ni-base superalloys
following intermediate temperature creep, Scripta Mater. 94 (2015) 5–8.
[56] R. A. MacKay, R. D. Maier, The influence of orientation on the stress rupture
properties of nickel-base superalloy single crystals, Metall. Trans. A 13 (1982)
1747–1754.
[57] V. Sass, U. Glatzel, M. Feller-Kniepmeier, Anisotropic creep properties of the
nickel-base superalloy CMSX-4, Acta Mater. 44 (1996) 1967–1977.
[58] S. Gunturi, D. MacLachlan, D. Knowles, Anisotropic creep in CMSX-4 in orien-
tations distant from 〈001〉, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 289 (2000) 289–298.
[59] G. Malzer, R. Hayes, T. Mack, G. Eggeler, Miniature specimen assessment of
creep of the single-crystal superalloy LEK 94 in the 1000 ◦C temperature range,
Metall. Mater. Trans. A 38 (2007) 314–327.
[60] D. Peter, F. Otto, T. Depka, P. Nortershauser, G. Eggeler, High temperature
test rig for inert atmosphere miniature specimen creep testing, Materialwiss.
Werkstofftech. 42 (2011) 493–499.
[61] P. B. Hirsch, A. Howie, R. Nicholson, D. Pashley, M. Whelan, Electron mi-
croscopy of thin crystals, Butterworths, Washington DC, 1965.
[62] J. W. Edington, Practical Electron Microscopy in Materials Science., Voan Nos-
trand, New York, 1975.
127
REFERENCES
[63] D. B. Williams, C. B. Carter, The transmission electron microscope, Springer,
New York, 1996.
[64] D. Hull, D. J. Bacon, Introduction to dislocations, Butterworth-Heinemann, Ox-
ford, 2001.
[65] J. P. Hirth, J. Lothe, Theory of dislocations, John Wiley & Sons, New York,
1982.
[66] J. Weertman, J. R. Weertman, Elementary dislocation theory, Macmillan, New
York, 1966.
[67] D. Cockayne, I. Ray, M. Whelan, Investigations of dislocation strain fields using
weak beams, Philos. Mag. 20 (1969) 1265–1270.
[68] L. A. Jacome, G. Eggeler, A. Dlouhy, Advanced scanning transmission stereo
electron microscopy of structural and functional engineering materials, Ultrami-
croscopy 122 (2012) 48–59.
[69] P. Phillips, M. Brandes, M. Mills, M. De Graef, Diffraction contrast STEM of
dislocations: imaging and simulations, Ultramicroscopy 111 (2011) 1483–1487.
[70] A. Dlouhy, J. Pesicka, Estimate of foil thickness by stereomicroscopy technique,
Czech. J. Phys. 40 (1990) 539–555.
[71] H. Hashimoto, A. Howie, M. Whelan, Anomalous electron absorption effects in
metal foils: Theory and comparison with experiment, in: Proceedings of the
Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,
volume 269, The Royal Society, 1962, pp. 80–103.
[72] J. M. Silcock, W. Tunstall, Partial dislocations associated with NbC precipitation
in austenitic stainless steels, Philos. Mag. 10 (1964) 361–389.
[73] Y. M. Eggeler, M. S. Titus, A. Suzuki, T. M. Pollock, Creep deformation-induced
antiphase boundaries in L12-containing single-crystal Cobalt-base superalloys,
Acta Mater. 77 (2014) 352–359.
[74] M. S. Titus, High temperature deformation mechanisms of L12-containing Co-
based superalloys, Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2015.
[75] M. H. Loretto, R. E. Smallman, Defect analysis in electron microscopy, Chapman
and Hall, London, 1975.
[76] http://www.sfb-transregio103.de/, 2016.
128
REFERENCES
[77] A. Giamei, D. Anton, Rhenium additions to a Ni-base superalloy: effects on
microstructure, Metall. Trans. A 16 (1985) 1997–2005.
[78] R. Hobbs, M. Karunaratne, S. Tin, R. Reed, C. Rae, Uphill diffusion in ternary
Ni–Re–Ru alloys at 1000 and 110 ◦C, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 460 (2007) 587–594.
[79] K. Matuszewski, R. Rettig, H. Matysiak, Z. Peng, I. Povstugar, P. Choi,
J. Muller, D. Raabe, E. Spiecker, K. J. Kurzyd lowski, et al., Effect of ruthenium
on the precipitation of topologically close packed phases in Ni-based superalloys
of 3rd and 4th generation, Acta Mater. 95 (2015) 274–283.
[80] R. Hobbs, L. Zhang, C. Rae, S. Tin, Mechanisms of topologically close-packed
phase suppression in an experimental ruthenium-bearing single-crystal nickel-
base superalloy at 1000 ◦C, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 39 (2008) 1014–1025.
[81] M. Simonetti, P. Caron, Role and behaviour of µ phase during deformation of a
nickel-based single crystal superalloy, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 254 (1998) 1–12.
[82] B. Wilson, J. Hickman, G. Fuchs, The effect of solution heat treatment on a
single-crystal Ni-based superalloy, JOM 55 (2003) 35–40.
[83] G. Fuchs, Solution heat treatment response of a third generation single crystal
Ni-base superalloy, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 300 (2001) 52–60.
[84] P. Wollgramm, D. Burger, A. Parsa, K. Neuking, G. Eggeler, The effect of stress,
temperature and loading direction on the creep behaviour of Ni-base single crystal
superalloy miniature tensile specimens, Mater. High Temp. 33 (2016) 1–15.
[85] G. Eggeler, Novel experimentation techniques to study damage accumulation
and microstructural instability during creep of super alloy single crystals at high
temperatures > 1000 ◦C, Mater. Sci. Technol. 25 (2009) 236–241.
[86] G. Malzer, Mechanische und mikrostrukturelle Untersuchungen zum Kriechver-
halten der einkristallinen Superlegierung LEK 94 bei Temperaturen um 100 ◦C
unter Verwendung einer Minikriechprobe, Ph.D. thesis, Ruhr University Bochum,
2007.
[87] R. Ham, The determination of dislocation densities in thin films, Philos. Mag. 6
(1961) 1183–1184.
[88] R. Ham, N. Sharpe, A systematic error in the determination of dislocation
densities in thin films, Philos. Mag. 6 (1961) 1193–1194.
129
REFERENCES
[89] D. Norfleet, D. Dimiduk, S. Polasik, M. Uchic, M. Mills, Dislocation structures
and their relationship to strength in deformed nickel microcrystals, Acta Mater.
56 (2008) 2988–3001.
[90] A. B. Parsa, P. Wollgramm, H. Buck, A. Kostka, C. Somsen, A. Dlouhy,
G. Eggeler, Ledges and grooves at γ/γ′ interfaces of single crystal superalloys,
Acta Mater. 90 (2015) 105–117.
[91] J. P. Morniroli, Large-angle convergent-beam electron diffraction applications to
crystal defects, Societe Francaise des Microscopies, Paris, 2004.
[92] J. Muller, G. Eggeler, E. Spiecker, On the identification of superdislocations in
the γ′-phase of single-crystal Ni-base superalloys-An application of the LACBED
method to complex microstructures, Acta Mater. 87 (2015) 34–44.
[93] Y. Eggeler, J. Muller, M. Titus, A. Suzuki, T. Pollock, E. Spiecker, Planar
defect formation in the γ′ phase during high temperature creep in single crystal
CoNi-base superalloys, Acta Mater. 113 (2016) 335–349.
[94] L. A. Jacome, P. Nortershauser, C. Somsen, A. Dlouhy, G. Eggeler, On the
nature of γ′ phase cutting and its effect on high temperature and low stress creep
anisotropy of Ni-base single crystal superalloys, Acta Mater. 69 (2014) 246–264.
[95] A. Dlouhy, R. Schaublin, G. Eggeler, Transmission electron microscopy contrast
simulations of 〈100〉 -superdislocations in the L12 ordered structure, Scripta
Mater. 39 (1998) 1325–1332.
[96] X. Wu, P. Wollgramm, C. Somsen, A. Dlouhy, A. Kostka, G. Eggeler, Double
minimum creep of single crystal ni-base superalloys, Acta Mater. 112 (2016)
242–260.
[97] W. Schneider, H. Mughrabi, J. Hammer, Creep deformation and rupture behavior
of the monocrystalline superalloy CMSX-4-A comparison with the alloy SRR 99,
in: Superalloys 1992, volume 26, 1992, pp. 589–598.
[98] B. Decamps, A. J. Morton, M. Condat, On the mechanism of shear of γ′ precipi-
tates by single (a/2) 〈110〉 dissociated matrix dislocations in Ni-based superalloys,
Philos. Mag. A 64 (1991) 641–668.
[99] C. Rae, L. Zhang, Primary creep in single crystal superalloys: some comments
on effects of composition and microstructure, Mater. Sci. Technol. 25 (2009)
228–235.
[100] A. Dlouhy, N. Merk, G. Eggeler, A microstructural study of creep in short fibre
reinforced aluminium alloys, Acta Metall. Mater. 41 (1993) 3245–3256.
130
REFERENCES
[101] A. Dlouhy, G. Eggeler, N. Merk, A micromechanical model for creep in short
fibre reinforced aluminium alloys, Acta Metall. Mater. 43 (1995) 535–550.
[102] M. Nathal, J. Diaz, R. Miner, High temperature creep behavior of single crystal
gammpraime and gamm laloys, in: MRS Proceedings, volume 133, Cambridge
Univ Press, 1988, p. 269.
[103] M. Probst-Hein, A. Dlouhy, G. Eggeler, Interface dislocations in superalloy single
crystals, Acta Mater. 47 (1999) 2497–2510.
[104] J. Svoboda, P. Lukas, Model of creep in 〈001〉 -oriented superalloy single crystals,
Acta Mater. 46 (1998) 3421–3431.
[105] J. Svoboda, P. Lukas, Modelling of recovery controlled creep in nickel-base su-
peralloy single crystals, Acta Mater. 45 (1997) 125–135.
[106] S. Gao, M. Fivel, A. Ma, A. Hartmaier, Influence of misfit stresses on disloca-
tion glide in single crystal superalloys: A three-dimensional discrete dislocation
dynamics study, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 76 (2015) 276–290.
[107] F. Ram, Z. Li, S. Zaefferer, S. M. H. Haghighat, Z. Zhu, D. Raabe, R. C. Reed,
On the origin of creep dislocations in a Ni-base, single-crystal superalloy: an
ECCI, EBSD, and dislocation dynamics-based study, Acta Mater. 109 (2016)
151–161.
[108] M. Karunaratne, P. Carter, R. Reed, Interdiffusion in the face-centred cubic
phase of the Ni–Re, Ni–Ta and Ni–W systems between 900 and 1300 ◦C, Mater.
Sci. Eng.: A 281 (2000) 229–233.
[109] J. Hammer, Kriech-und Zeitstandverhalten der einkristallinen Nickelbasis-
Superlegierung SRR 99 unter besonderer Berucksichtigung der mikrostruk-
turellen Vorgange und der Materialfehler, Ph.D. thesis, Friedrich-Alexander Uni-
versity Erlangen-Nurnberg, 1990.
[110] W. Schneider, Hochtemperaturkriechverhalten und Mikrostruktur der
einkristallinen Nickelbasis-Superlegierung CMSX-4 bei Temperaturen von
800Graden C bis 1100Graden C, Ph.D. thesis, Friedrich-Alexander University
Erlangen-Nurnberg, 1993.
[111] V. Sass, W. Schneider, H. Mughrabi, On the orientation dependence of the
intermediate-temperature creep behaviour of a monocrystalline nickel-base su-
peralloy, Scripta Metall. Mater. 31 (1994) 885–890.
131
REFERENCES
[112] N. Matan, D. Cox, P. Carter, M. Rist, C. Rae, R. Reed, Creep of CMSX-
4 superalloy single crystals: effects of misorientation and temperature, Acta
Mater. 47 (1999) 1549–1563.
[113] D. Knowles, Q. Chen, Superlattice stacking fault formation and twinning during
creep in γ/γ′ single crystal superalloy CMSX-4, Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 340 (2003)
88–102.
[114] V. Vorontsov, L. Kovarik, M. Mills, C. Rae, High-resolution electron microscopy
of dislocation ribbons in a CMSX-4 superalloy single crystal, Acta Mater. 60
(2012) 4866–4878.
[115] L. Kovarik, R. Unocic, J. Li, M. Mills, The intermediate temperature deformation
of Ni-based superalloys: Importance of reordering, JOM 61 (2009) 42–48.
[116] D. G. Morris, M. A. Munoz-Morris, Thermal and mechanical disordering of
ordered alloys, in: Howe, JM and Laughlin, DE and Lee, JK and Dahmen, U
and Soffa, WA (Ed.), Solid-Solid Phase Transformations in Inorganic Materials
2005, Vol 1, TMS, Warrendale, 2005, pp. 199–208.
[117] M. S. Titus, A. Mottura, G. B. Viswanathan, A. Suzuki, M. J. Mills, T. M.
Pollock, High resolution energy dispersive spectroscopy mapping of planar defects
in L12-containing Co-base superalloys, Acta Mater. 89 (2015) 423–437.
[118] V. Yardley, I. Povstugar, P.-P. Choi, D. Raabe, A. B. Parsa, A. Kostka, C. Som-
sen, A. Dlouhy, K. Neuking, E. P. George, et al., On local phase equilibria and
the appearance of nanoparticles in the microstructure of single-crystal Ni-base
superalloys, Adv. Eng. Mater. 18 (2016) 1556–1567.
[119] S. Xiang, S. Mao, H. Wei, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, Z. Shen, H. Long, H. Zhang, X. Wang,
Z. Zhang, et al., Selective evolution of secondary γ′ precipitation in a Ni-based
single crystal superalloy both in the γ matrix and at the dislocation nodes, Acta
Mater. 116 (2016) 343–353.
[120] K. Demtroder, G. Eggeler, J. Schreuer, Influence of microstructure on macro-
scopic elastic properties and thermal expansion of Nickel-base superalloys
ERBO/1 and LEK94, Materialwiss. Werkstofftech. 46 (2015) 563–576.
132
Appendices
Figure A.1: TEM images showing dislocation movements at 750 ◦C, 800 MPa, 0.2%.(a) Dislocations gliding in one direction of γ channel. (b) Dislocations gliding alongtwo sides of one γ′ particle. (c) Dislocations expanding from one central loop into otherdirection of γ channels. (d) More dislocations sending to the same direction of channel.
133
APPENDICES
Figure A.2: Comparison of a pair of plus and minus g-vector analyzing a stacking faultat 750 ◦C, 800 MPa, 0.2%. (a) BF image under +g, the two outermost fringes are bothdark. (b) BF image under -g, the two outermost fringes are both bright. (c) CDFimage corresponding to +g, the lower outermost fringe is bright. (d) CDF image cor-responding to -g, the upper outermost fringe is bright. (e) WBDF image correspondingto +g, dislocations show better contrast. (f) WBDF image corresponding to -g, boththe stacking fault and dislocations are highlighted.
134
APPENDICES
Figure A.3: A tilting series for a stacking fault analysis at the condition of 750 ◦C,800 MPa and 0.2%. (a) BF image at [111]. (b) BF image at [020]. (c) BF image at[111], the stacking fault has been oriented edge-on, as indicated by the white dashedline. (d) BF image at [220], stacking fault is invisible. (e) BF image at [202]. (f) BFimage at [022]. (g) BF image at [311], the stacking fault is invisble. (h) BF image at[113]. (i) BF image at [131].
135
APPENDICES
Figure A.4: Microstructure of 750 ◦C, 800 MPa, 1%, foil normal [001]. (a) CTEM BFimage showing SFs. SFs start from γ′ corners, direction indicated by white dashedline. (b) CTEM CDF image for SF nature determination. (c) CTEM BF imageshowing SFs at a higher magnification. (d) CTEM WBDF image showing partialdislocation associated with SF. (e) Multi-beam STEM image showing SFs and lowerdensity of dislocations. (f) Multi-beam STEM image showing SF and higher densityof dislocations.
136
APPENDICES
Figure A.5: An anaglyph showing an inclined stacking fault at the condition of 750 ◦C,800 MPa, 0.1%.
137
APPENDICES
Figure A.6: Illustration of (111) projection of L12 structure. The symbols have thesame meaning as in Figure 2.10. (a) Projection of (111) plane, with three 〈110〉 and〈112〉 directions. (b) The top layer is shifted by 1/3 [112] and a SESF is generated.(c) The top layer is shifted by 1/3 [121] and a SESF is generated. (d) The top layer isshifted by 1/3 [211] and a SISF is generated.
138
Publications
Part of the work has been published in the following journal / proceeding:
• X. Wu, P. Wollgramm, C. Somsen, A. Dlouhy, A. Kostka, G. Eggeler, Double
minimum creep of single crystal Ni-base superalloys, Acta Mater. 112 (2016)
242-260.
• P. Wollgramm, X. Wu, G. Eggeler, On the temperature dependence of creep
behavior of Ni-base single crystal superalloys, Superalloys 2016.
Part of the work has been presented in the following conferences:
• Junior EuroMat, July 2016, Lausanne, Switzerland
• Superalloys 2016, Sep. 2016, Pennsylvania, USA
Curriculum Vitae
Personal Information
Name: Xiaoxiang Wu
Gender: Female
Date of birth: 09/11/1988
Nationality: Chinese
Education
Oct. 2013 - present Ph.D. student at the Chair of Materials Science in Ruhr Uni-
versity Bochum
Sep. 2010 – June 2013 Master degree in engineering at the Faculty of Materials Sci-
ence in Kunming University of Science and Technology
Sep. 2006 – June 2010 Bachelor degree in engineering at the Faculty of Mechanical
Engineering in East China Jiaotong University
Sep. 2003 – June 2006 High school education and college entrance exam
Academic / work Experiences
Oct. 2013 - present Research assistant (Ph.D. student) at the Chair of Materials
Science in Ruhr University Bochum.
Main activity: TEM investigation for Ni-base single crystal
superalloy.
Sep. 2010 – June 2013 Research assistant (master student) at the Faculty of Materi-
als Science in Kunming University of Science and Technology.
Main activity: tensile tests for copper alloys and XRD char-
acterization.
Language Abilities
Chinese: Native speaker
German: B1
English: proficient level: BEC (higher)
top related