Electronic Liquid Crystal Phases in Strongly …eduardo.physics.illinois.edu/homepage/aspen-2011.pdfElectronic Liquid Crystal Phases in Strongly Correlated Systems Eduardo Fradkin

Post on 13-Jul-2020

0 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

Electronic Liquid Crystal Phases in Strongly Correlated Systems

Eduardo FradkinUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Talk at the workshop “Materials and the Imagination”, Aspen Center of Physics, January 4-8, 2011

Thursday, June 14, 12

Collaborators

• S. Kivelson, V. Emery, E. Berg, D. Barci, E.-A. Kim, M. Lawler, T. Lubensky, V. Oganesyan, K. Sun, C. Wu, S. C. Zhang, J. Eisenstein, A. Kapitulnik, A. Mackenzie, J. Tranquada

•S. Kivelson, E. Fradkin and V. J. Emery, Electronic Liquid Crystal Phases of a Doped Mott Insulator, Nature 393, 550 (1998)•S. Kivelson, I. Bindloss, E. Fradkin, V. Oganesyan, J. Tranquada, A. Kapitulnik and C.Howald, How to detect fluctuating stripes in high tempertature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 1201 (2003)•E. Fradkin, S. Kivelson, M. Lawler, J. Eisenstein, and A. Mackenzie, Nematic Fermi Fluids in Condensed Matter Physics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 153 (2010)•E. Berg, E. Fradkin, S. Kivelson, and J. Tranquada, Striped Superconductors: How the cuprates intertwine spin, charge, and superconducting orders, New. J. Phys. 11, 115009 (2009).•E. Berg, E. Fradkin, and S. Kivelson, Charge 4e superconductivity from pair density wave order in certain high temperature superconductors, Nature Physics 5, 830 (2009).•D. Barci and E. Fradkin, Phase Transitions in Superconducting Liquid Crystal Phases, arXiv:1005.1928.

Thursday, June 14, 12

Electronic Liquid Crystal phases in doped Mott insulators

Thursday, June 14, 12

Electronic Liquid Crystal phases in doped Mott insulators

• Doping a Mott insulator leads to a system with a tendency to phase separation frustrated by strong correlations

Thursday, June 14, 12

Electronic Liquid Crystal phases in doped Mott insulators

• Doping a Mott insulator leads to a system with a tendency to phase separation frustrated by strong correlations

• The result are electronic liquid crystal phases: crystals, stripes (smectic), nematic and fluids, with different degrees of breakdown of translation and rotational symmetry

Thursday, June 14, 12

Electronic Liquid Crystal phases in doped Mott insulators

• Doping a Mott insulator leads to a system with a tendency to phase separation frustrated by strong correlations

• The result are electronic liquid crystal phases: crystals, stripes (smectic), nematic and fluids, with different degrees of breakdown of translation and rotational symmetry

• In lattice systems these symmetries are discrete

Thursday, June 14, 12

Electronic Liquid Crystal phases in doped Mott insulators

• Doping a Mott insulator leads to a system with a tendency to phase separation frustrated by strong correlations

• The result are electronic liquid crystal phases: crystals, stripes (smectic), nematic and fluids, with different degrees of breakdown of translation and rotational symmetry

• In lattice systems these symmetries are discrete

• Examples: stripe phases in HTSC, nematic phase of the 2DEG in magnetic fields, in YBCO and BSCCO, and in iron pnictides and heavy fermions.

Thursday, June 14, 12

Electronic Liquid Crystal phases in doped Mott insulators

• Doping a Mott insulator leads to a system with a tendency to phase separation frustrated by strong correlations

• The result are electronic liquid crystal phases: crystals, stripes (smectic), nematic and fluids, with different degrees of breakdown of translation and rotational symmetry

• In lattice systems these symmetries are discrete

• Examples: stripe phases in HTSC, nematic phase of the 2DEG in magnetic fields, in YBCO and BSCCO, and in iron pnictides and heavy fermions.

• In addition to their charge and spin orders, these phases may also be superconducting

Thursday, June 14, 12

How Liquid Crystals got an or

Soft Quantum Matter

~

Thursday, June 14, 12

Conducting Liquid Crystal Phases and HTSC

Thursday, June 14, 12

Conducting Liquid Crystal Phases and HTSC

• Stripes: unidirectional charge ordered states

Thursday, June 14, 12

Conducting Liquid Crystal Phases and HTSC

• Stripes: unidirectional charge ordered states

• Nematic: a uniform metallic (or superconducting) state with anisotropic transport

Thursday, June 14, 12

Conducting Liquid Crystal Phases and HTSC

• Stripes: unidirectional charge ordered states

• Nematic: a uniform metallic (or superconducting) state with anisotropic transport

• Stripe and nematic ordered states in HTSC: static stripes in LBCO and LNSCO x~1/8, in LSCO and YBCO in magnetic fields. Nematic order in the pseudogap regime of YBCO: INS ~6.45 and anisotropy in Nernst measurements

Thursday, June 14, 12

Conducting Liquid Crystal Phases and HTSC

• Stripes: unidirectional charge ordered states

• Nematic: a uniform metallic (or superconducting) state with anisotropic transport

• Stripe and nematic ordered states in HTSC: static stripes in LBCO and LNSCO x~1/8, in LSCO and YBCO in magnetic fields. Nematic order in the pseudogap regime of YBCO: INS ~6.45 and anisotropy in Nernst measurements

• “Fluctuating” stripes, in superconducting LSCO, LBCO away from 1/8, and underdoped YBCO

Thursday, June 14, 12

Conducting Liquid Crystal Phases and HTSC

• Stripes: unidirectional charge ordered states

• Nematic: a uniform metallic (or superconducting) state with anisotropic transport

• Stripe and nematic ordered states in HTSC: static stripes in LBCO and LNSCO x~1/8, in LSCO and YBCO in magnetic fields. Nematic order in the pseudogap regime of YBCO: INS ~6.45 and anisotropy in Nernst measurements

• “Fluctuating” stripes, in superconducting LSCO, LBCO away from 1/8, and underdoped YBCO

• The high energy electronic states seen in BSCCO by STM/STS have local nematic order

Thursday, June 14, 12

Conducting Liquid Crystal Phases and HTSC

• Stripes: unidirectional charge ordered states

• Nematic: a uniform metallic (or superconducting) state with anisotropic transport

• Stripe and nematic ordered states in HTSC: static stripes in LBCO and LNSCO x~1/8, in LSCO and YBCO in magnetic fields. Nematic order in the pseudogap regime of YBCO: INS ~6.45 and anisotropy in Nernst measurements

• “Fluctuating” stripes, in superconducting LSCO, LBCO away from 1/8, and underdoped YBCO

• The high energy electronic states seen in BSCCO by STM/STS have local nematic order

• Is charge order a friend or a foe of high Tc superconductivity?

Thursday, June 14, 12

The case of La1-x Bax CuO4

Thursday, June 14, 12

The case of La1-x Bax CuO4

• LBCO, the original HTSC, is known to exhibit low energy stripe fluctuations in its superconducting state

Thursday, June 14, 12

The case of La1-x Bax CuO4

• LBCO, the original HTSC, is known to exhibit low energy stripe fluctuations in its superconducting state

• It has a very low Tc near x=1/8 where it shows static stripe order in the LTT crystal structure

Thursday, June 14, 12

The case of La1-x Bax CuO4

• LBCO, the original HTSC, is known to exhibit low energy stripe fluctuations in its superconducting state

• It has a very low Tc near x=1/8 where it shows static stripe order in the LTT crystal structure

• Experimental evidence for superconducting layer decoupling in LBCO at x=1/8

Thursday, June 14, 12

The case of La1-x Bax CuO4

• LBCO, the original HTSC, is known to exhibit low energy stripe fluctuations in its superconducting state

• It has a very low Tc near x=1/8 where it shows static stripe order in the LTT crystal structure

• Experimental evidence for superconducting layer decoupling in LBCO at x=1/8

• Layer decoupling, long range charge and spin stripe order and superconductivity: a novel striped superconducting state, a Pair Density Wave, in which charge, spin, and superconducting orders are intertwined!

Thursday, June 14, 12

Phase Diagram of LBCO

LBCO

SO

0.100 0.125 0.1500

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

CO

SC

LTO

Tc

TLT

SC

LTT

Tem

per

ature

(K

)

hole doping (x)

M. Hücker et al (2009)Thursday, June 14, 12

Li et al (2007): Dynamical Layer Decoupling in LBCO

Thursday, June 14, 12

• ARPES: anti-nodal d-wave SC gap is large and unsuppressed at 1/8

Li et al (2007): Dynamical Layer Decoupling in LBCO

Thursday, June 14, 12

• ARPES: anti-nodal d-wave SC gap is large and unsuppressed at 1/8

• Static charge stripe order for T< Tcharge=54 K

Li et al (2007): Dynamical Layer Decoupling in LBCO

Thursday, June 14, 12

• ARPES: anti-nodal d-wave SC gap is large and unsuppressed at 1/8

• Static charge stripe order for T< Tcharge=54 K

• Static Stripe Spin order T < Tspin= 42K

Li et al (2007): Dynamical Layer Decoupling in LBCO

Thursday, June 14, 12

• ARPES: anti-nodal d-wave SC gap is large and unsuppressed at 1/8

• Static charge stripe order for T< Tcharge=54 K

• Static Stripe Spin order T < Tspin= 42K

• ρab drops rapidly to zero from Tspin to TKT

Li et al (2007): Dynamical Layer Decoupling in LBCO

Thursday, June 14, 12

• ARPES: anti-nodal d-wave SC gap is large and unsuppressed at 1/8

• Static charge stripe order for T< Tcharge=54 K

• Static Stripe Spin order T < Tspin= 42K

• ρab drops rapidly to zero from Tspin to TKT

• ρab shows KT behavior for Tspin > T > TKT

Li et al (2007): Dynamical Layer Decoupling in LBCO

Thursday, June 14, 12

• ARPES: anti-nodal d-wave SC gap is large and unsuppressed at 1/8

• Static charge stripe order for T< Tcharge=54 K

• Static Stripe Spin order T < Tspin= 42K

• ρab drops rapidly to zero from Tspin to TKT

• ρab shows KT behavior for Tspin > T > TKT

• ρc ↑ as T↓ for T>T**≈ 35K

Li et al (2007): Dynamical Layer Decoupling in LBCO

Thursday, June 14, 12

• ARPES: anti-nodal d-wave SC gap is large and unsuppressed at 1/8

• Static charge stripe order for T< Tcharge=54 K

• Static Stripe Spin order T < Tspin= 42K

• ρab drops rapidly to zero from Tspin to TKT

• ρab shows KT behavior for Tspin > T > TKT

• ρc ↑ as T↓ for T>T**≈ 35K

• ρc →0 as T →T3D= 10K

Li et al (2007): Dynamical Layer Decoupling in LBCO

Thursday, June 14, 12

• ARPES: anti-nodal d-wave SC gap is large and unsuppressed at 1/8

• Static charge stripe order for T< Tcharge=54 K

• Static Stripe Spin order T < Tspin= 42K

• ρab drops rapidly to zero from Tspin to TKT

• ρab shows KT behavior for Tspin > T > TKT

• ρc ↑ as T↓ for T>T**≈ 35K

• ρc →0 as T →T3D= 10K

• ρc / ρab → ∞ for TKT > T > T3D

Li et al (2007): Dynamical Layer Decoupling in LBCO

Thursday, June 14, 12

• ARPES: anti-nodal d-wave SC gap is large and unsuppressed at 1/8

• Static charge stripe order for T< Tcharge=54 K

• Static Stripe Spin order T < Tspin= 42K

• ρab drops rapidly to zero from Tspin to TKT

• ρab shows KT behavior for Tspin > T > TKT

• ρc ↑ as T↓ for T>T**≈ 35K

• ρc →0 as T →T3D= 10K

• ρc / ρab → ∞ for TKT > T > T3D

• Meissner state only below Tc= 4K

Li et al (2007): Dynamical Layer Decoupling in LBCO

Thursday, June 14, 12

Thursday, June 14, 12

Anisotropic Transport Below the Charge Ordering transition

Li et al, 2007

Thursday, June 14, 12

The 2D Resistive State and 2D Superconductivity

Li et al, 2007

Thursday, June 14, 12

How Do We Understand This Remarkable Effects?

Thursday, June 14, 12

How Do We Understand This Remarkable Effects?

• Broad temperature range, T3D < T < T2D with 2D superconductivity but not in 3D, as if there is not interlayer Josephson coupling

Thursday, June 14, 12

How Do We Understand This Remarkable Effects?

• Broad temperature range, T3D < T < T2D with 2D superconductivity but not in 3D, as if there is not interlayer Josephson coupling

• In this regime there is both striped charge and spin order

Thursday, June 14, 12

How Do We Understand This Remarkable Effects?

• Broad temperature range, T3D < T < T2D with 2D superconductivity but not in 3D, as if there is not interlayer Josephson coupling

• In this regime there is both striped charge and spin order

• This can only happen if there is a special symmetry of the superconductor in the striped state that leads to an almost complete cancellation of the c-axis Josephson coupling.

Thursday, June 14, 12

A Striped Textured Superconducting Phase

Thursday, June 14, 12

A Striped Textured Superconducting Phase

• The stripe state in the LTT crystal structure has two planes in the unit cell.

Thursday, June 14, 12

A Striped Textured Superconducting Phase

• The stripe state in the LTT crystal structure has two planes in the unit cell.

• Stripes in the 2nd neighbor planes are shifted by half a period to minimize the Coulomb interaction: 4 planes per unit cell

Thursday, June 14, 12

A Striped Textured Superconducting Phase

• The stripe state in the LTT crystal structure has two planes in the unit cell.

• Stripes in the 2nd neighbor planes are shifted by half a period to minimize the Coulomb interaction: 4 planes per unit cell

• The AFM spin order suffers a π phase shift accross the charge stripe which has period 4

Thursday, June 14, 12

A Striped Textured Superconducting Phase

• The stripe state in the LTT crystal structure has two planes in the unit cell.

• Stripes in the 2nd neighbor planes are shifted by half a period to minimize the Coulomb interaction: 4 planes per unit cell

• The AFM spin order suffers a π phase shift accross the charge stripe which has period 4

• We propose that the superconducting order is also striped and also suffers a π phase shift.

Thursday, June 14, 12

A Striped Textured Superconducting Phase

• The stripe state in the LTT crystal structure has two planes in the unit cell.

• Stripes in the 2nd neighbor planes are shifted by half a period to minimize the Coulomb interaction: 4 planes per unit cell

• The AFM spin order suffers a π phase shift accross the charge stripe which has period 4

• We propose that the superconducting order is also striped and also suffers a π phase shift.

• The superconductivity resides in the spin gap regions and there is a π phase shift in the SC order across the AFM regions

Thursday, June 14, 12

Period 4 Striped Superconducting State

x)6(

x

E. Berg et al, 2007

Thursday, June 14, 12

Period 4 Striped Superconducting State

• This state has intertwined striped charge, spin and superconducting orders.

x)6(

x

E. Berg et al, 2007

Thursday, June 14, 12

Period 4 Striped Superconducting State

• This state has intertwined striped charge, spin and superconducting orders.

• A state of this type was found in variational Monte Carlo (Ogata et al 2004) and MFT (Poilblanc et al 2007)

x)6(

x

E. Berg et al, 2007

Thursday, June 14, 12

How does this state solve the puzzle?

Thursday, June 14, 12

How does this state solve the puzzle?

• If this order is perfect, the Josephson coupling between neighboring planes cancels exactly due to the symmetry of the periodic array of π textures

Thursday, June 14, 12

How does this state solve the puzzle?

• If this order is perfect, the Josephson coupling between neighboring planes cancels exactly due to the symmetry of the periodic array of π textures

• The Josephson couplings J1 and J2 between planes two and three layers apart also cancel by symmetry.

Thursday, June 14, 12

How does this state solve the puzzle?

• If this order is perfect, the Josephson coupling between neighboring planes cancels exactly due to the symmetry of the periodic array of π textures

• The Josephson couplings J1 and J2 between planes two and three layers apart also cancel by symmetry.

• The first non-vanishing coupling J3 occurs at four spacings. It is quite small and it is responsible for the non-zero but very low Tc

Thursday, June 14, 12

How does this state solve the puzzle?

• If this order is perfect, the Josephson coupling between neighboring planes cancels exactly due to the symmetry of the periodic array of π textures

• The Josephson couplings J1 and J2 between planes two and three layers apart also cancel by symmetry.

• The first non-vanishing coupling J3 occurs at four spacings. It is quite small and it is responsible for the non-zero but very low Tc

• Defects and/or discommensurations gives rise to small Josephson coupling J0 neighboring planes

Thursday, June 14, 12

Are there other interactions?

Thursday, June 14, 12

Are there other interactions?

• It is possible to have an inter-plane biquadratic coupling involving the product SC of the order parameters between neighboring planes Δ1 Δ2 and the product of spin stripe order parameters also on neighboring planes M1 . M2

Thursday, June 14, 12

Are there other interactions?

• It is possible to have an inter-plane biquadratic coupling involving the product SC of the order parameters between neighboring planes Δ1 Δ2 and the product of spin stripe order parameters also on neighboring planes M1 . M2

• However in the LTT structure M1 . M2=0 and there is no such coupling

Thursday, June 14, 12

Are there other interactions?

• It is possible to have an inter-plane biquadratic coupling involving the product SC of the order parameters between neighboring planes Δ1 Δ2 and the product of spin stripe order parameters also on neighboring planes M1 . M2

• However in the LTT structure M1 . M2=0 and there is no such coupling

• In a large enough perpendicular magnetic field it is possible (spin flop transition) to induce such a term and hence an effective Josephson coupling.

Thursday, June 14, 12

Are there other interactions?

• It is possible to have an inter-plane biquadratic coupling involving the product SC of the order parameters between neighboring planes Δ1 Δ2 and the product of spin stripe order parameters also on neighboring planes M1 . M2

• However in the LTT structure M1 . M2=0 and there is no such coupling

• In a large enough perpendicular magnetic field it is possible (spin flop transition) to induce such a term and hence an effective Josephson coupling.

• Thus in this state there should be a strong suppression of the 3D SC Tc but not of the 2D SC Tc

Thursday, June 14, 12

Away from x=1/8

Thursday, June 14, 12

Away from x=1/8

• Away from x=1/8 there is no perfect commensuration

Thursday, June 14, 12

Away from x=1/8

• Away from x=1/8 there is no perfect commensuration

• Discommensurations are defects that induce a finite Josephson coupling between neighboring planes J1 ~ |x-1/8|2, leading to an increase of the 3D SC Tc away from 1/8

Thursday, June 14, 12

Away from x=1/8

• Away from x=1/8 there is no perfect commensuration

• Discommensurations are defects that induce a finite Josephson coupling between neighboring planes J1 ~ |x-1/8|2, leading to an increase of the 3D SC Tc away from 1/8

• Similar effects arise from disorder which also lead to a rise in the 3D SC Tc

Thursday, June 14, 12

Landau-Ginzburg Theory of the striped SC: Order Parameters

• Striped SC: Δ(r)=ΔQ(r) ei Q.r+ Δ-Q(r) e-iQ.r , complex charge 2e singlet pair condensate with wave vector, (i.e. an FFLO type state at zero magnetic field)

• Nematic: detects breaking of rotational symmetry: N, a real neutral pseudo-scalar order parameter

• Charge stripe: ρK, unidirectional charge stripe with wave vector K

• Spin stripe order parameter: SQ, a neutral complex spin vector order parameter, K=2Q

Thursday, June 14, 12

Ginzburg-Landau Free Energy Functional

Thursday, June 14, 12

Ginzburg-Landau Free Energy Functional

•F=F2+ F3 + F4 + ...

Thursday, June 14, 12

Ginzburg-Landau Free Energy Functional

•F=F2+ F3 + F4 + ...

•The quadratic and quartic terms are standard

Thursday, June 14, 12

Ginzburg-Landau Free Energy Functional

•F=F2+ F3 + F4 + ...

•The quadratic and quartic terms are standard

•F3= γs ρK* SQ . SQ + π/2 rotation + c.c.

Thursday, June 14, 12

Ginzburg-Landau Free Energy Functional

•F=F2+ F3 + F4 + ...

•The quadratic and quartic terms are standard

•F3= γs ρK* SQ . SQ + π/2 rotation + c.c.+γΔ ρK* Δ-Q* ΔQ + π/2 rotation + c.c.

Thursday, June 14, 12

Ginzburg-Landau Free Energy Functional

•F=F2+ F3 + F4 + ...

•The quadratic and quartic terms are standard

•F3= γs ρK* SQ . SQ + π/2 rotation + c.c.+γΔ ρK* Δ-Q* ΔQ + π/2 rotation + c.c.+gΔ N (ΔQ* ΔQ+ Δ-Q* Δ-Q -π/2 rotation) + c.c.

Thursday, June 14, 12

Ginzburg-Landau Free Energy Functional

•F=F2+ F3 + F4 + ...

•The quadratic and quartic terms are standard

•F3= γs ρK* SQ . SQ + π/2 rotation + c.c.+γΔ ρK* Δ-Q* ΔQ + π/2 rotation + c.c.+gΔ N (ΔQ* ΔQ+ Δ-Q* Δ-Q -π/2 rotation) + c.c.+gs N (SQ* . SQ -π/2 rotation)

Thursday, June 14, 12

Ginzburg-Landau Free Energy Functional

•F=F2+ F3 + F4 + ...

•The quadratic and quartic terms are standard

•F3= γs ρK* SQ . SQ + π/2 rotation + c.c.+γΔ ρK* Δ-Q* ΔQ + π/2 rotation + c.c.+gΔ N (ΔQ* ΔQ+ Δ-Q* Δ-Q -π/2 rotation) + c.c.+gs N (SQ* . SQ -π/2 rotation)+gc N (ρK* ρK -π/2 rotation)

Thursday, June 14, 12

Some Consequences of the GL theory

Thursday, June 14, 12

Some Consequences of the GL theory

• The symmetry of the term coupling charge and spin order parameters requires the condition K= 2Q

Thursday, June 14, 12

Some Consequences of the GL theory

• The symmetry of the term coupling charge and spin order parameters requires the condition K= 2Q

• Striped SC order implies charge stripe order with 1/2 the period, and of nematic order

Thursday, June 14, 12

Some Consequences of the GL theory

• The symmetry of the term coupling charge and spin order parameters requires the condition K= 2Q

• Striped SC order implies charge stripe order with 1/2 the period, and of nematic order

• Charge stripe order with wave vector 2Q and/or nematic order favors stripe superconducting order which may or may not occur depending on the coefficients in the quadratic part

Thursday, June 14, 12

Some Consequences of the GL theory

• The symmetry of the term coupling charge and spin order parameters requires the condition K= 2Q

• Striped SC order implies charge stripe order with 1/2 the period, and of nematic order

• Charge stripe order with wave vector 2Q and/or nematic order favors stripe superconducting order which may or may not occur depending on the coefficients in the quadratic part

• Coupling to a charge 4e SC order parameter Δ4

Thursday, June 14, 12

Some Consequences of the GL theory

• The symmetry of the term coupling charge and spin order parameters requires the condition K= 2Q

• Striped SC order implies charge stripe order with 1/2 the period, and of nematic order

• Charge stripe order with wave vector 2Q and/or nematic order favors stripe superconducting order which may or may not occur depending on the coefficients in the quadratic part

• Coupling to a charge 4e SC order parameter Δ4

• F’3=g4 [Δ4* (ΔQ Δ-Q+ rotation)+ c.c.]

Thursday, June 14, 12

Some Consequences of the GL theory

• The symmetry of the term coupling charge and spin order parameters requires the condition K= 2Q

• Striped SC order implies charge stripe order with 1/2 the period, and of nematic order

• Charge stripe order with wave vector 2Q and/or nematic order favors stripe superconducting order which may or may not occur depending on the coefficients in the quadratic part

• Coupling to a charge 4e SC order parameter Δ4

• F’3=g4 [Δ4* (ΔQ Δ-Q+ rotation)+ c.c.]

• Striped SC order (PDW) ⇒ uniform charge 4e SC order

Thursday, June 14, 12

Coexisting uniform and striped SC order

Thursday, June 14, 12

Coexisting uniform and striped SC order

• PDW order ΔQ and uniform SC order Δ0

Thursday, June 14, 12

Coexisting uniform and striped SC order

• PDW order ΔQ and uniform SC order Δ0

• F3,u=ϒΔ Δ0* ρQ Δ-Q+ρ-Q ΔQ+gρ ρ-2Q ρQ2 +rotation+c.c.

Thursday, June 14, 12

Coexisting uniform and striped SC order

• PDW order ΔQ and uniform SC order Δ0

• F3,u=ϒΔ Δ0* ρQ Δ-Q+ρ-Q ΔQ+gρ ρ-2Q ρQ2 +rotation+c.c.

• If Δ0≠0 and ΔQ≠0 ⇒ there is a ρQ component of

the charge order!

Thursday, June 14, 12

Coexisting uniform and striped SC order

• PDW order ΔQ and uniform SC order Δ0

• F3,u=ϒΔ Δ0* ρQ Δ-Q+ρ-Q ΔQ+gρ ρ-2Q ρQ2 +rotation+c.c.

• If Δ0≠0 and ΔQ≠0 ⇒ there is a ρQ component of

the charge order!

• The small uniform component Δ0 removes the sensitivity to quenched disorder of the PDW state

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

• ρ(r)=|ρK| cos [K r+ Φ(r)]

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

• ρ(r)=|ρK| cos [K r+ Φ(r)]

• Δ(r)=|ΔQ| exp[i Q r + i θQ(r)]+|Δ-Q| exp[-i Q r + i θ-Q(r)]

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

• ρ(r)=|ρK| cos [K r+ Φ(r)]

• Δ(r)=|ΔQ| exp[i Q r + i θQ(r)]+|Δ-Q| exp[-i Q r + i θ-Q(r)]

• F3,ϒ=2ϒΔ |ρK ΔQ Δ-Q| cos[2 θ-(r)-Φ(r)]

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

• ρ(r)=|ρK| cos [K r+ Φ(r)]

• Δ(r)=|ΔQ| exp[i Q r + i θQ(r)]+|Δ-Q| exp[-i Q r + i θ-Q(r)]

• F3,ϒ=2ϒΔ |ρK ΔQ Δ-Q| cos[2 θ-(r)-Φ(r)]

• θ±Q(r)=[θ+(r) ± θ-(r)]/2

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

• ρ(r)=|ρK| cos [K r+ Φ(r)]

• Δ(r)=|ΔQ| exp[i Q r + i θQ(r)]+|Δ-Q| exp[-i Q r + i θ-Q(r)]

• F3,ϒ=2ϒΔ |ρK ΔQ Δ-Q| cos[2 θ-(r)-Φ(r)]

• θ±Q(r)=[θ+(r) ± θ-(r)]/2

• θ±Q single valued mod 2π ⇒ θ± defined mod π

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

• ρ(r)=|ρK| cos [K r+ Φ(r)]

• Δ(r)=|ΔQ| exp[i Q r + i θQ(r)]+|Δ-Q| exp[-i Q r + i θ-Q(r)]

• F3,ϒ=2ϒΔ |ρK ΔQ Δ-Q| cos[2 θ-(r)-Φ(r)]

• θ±Q(r)=[θ+(r) ± θ-(r)]/2

• θ±Q single valued mod 2π ⇒ θ± defined mod π

• ϕ and θ- are locked ⇒ topological defects of ϕ and θ+

Thursday, June 14, 12

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

• SC vortex with Δθ+ = 2π and Δϕ=0

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

• SC vortex with Δθ+ = 2π and Δϕ=0

• Bound state of a 1/2 vortex and a dislocation

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

• SC vortex with Δθ+ = 2π and Δϕ=0

• Bound state of a 1/2 vortex and a dislocation

Δθ+ = π, Δϕ= 2π

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

• SC vortex with Δθ+ = 2π and Δϕ=0

• Bound state of a 1/2 vortex and a dislocation

Δθ+ = π, Δϕ= 2π

• Double dislocation, Δθ+ = 0, Δϕ= 4π

Thursday, June 14, 12

Topological Excitations of the Striped SC

• SC vortex with Δθ+ = 2π and Δϕ=0

• Bound state of a 1/2 vortex and a dislocation

Δθ+ = π, Δϕ= 2π

• Double dislocation, Δθ+ = 0, Δϕ= 4π

• All three topological defects have logarithmic interactions

Thursday, June 14, 12

Half-vortex and a Dislocation

/

ï6 <6 6 <6 6 <6

Thursday, June 14, 12

Double Dislocation

Thursday, June 14, 12

Thursday, June 14, 12

Thermal melting of the PDW state

Thursday, June 14, 12

Thermal melting of the PDW state

• Three paths for thermal melting of the PDW state

Thursday, June 14, 12

Thermal melting of the PDW state

• Three paths for thermal melting of the PDW state

• Three types of topological excitations: (1,0) (SC vortex), (0,1) (double dislocation), (±1/2, ±1/2) (1/2 vortex, single dislocation bound pair)

Thursday, June 14, 12

Thermal melting of the PDW state

• Three paths for thermal melting of the PDW state

• Three types of topological excitations: (1,0) (SC vortex), (0,1) (double dislocation), (±1/2, ±1/2) (1/2 vortex, single dislocation bound pair)

• Scaling dimensions: ∆p,q=π(ρsc p2+κcdw q2)/T=2 (for marginality)

Thursday, June 14, 12

Thermal melting of the PDW state

• Three paths for thermal melting of the PDW state

• Three types of topological excitations: (1,0) (SC vortex), (0,1) (double dislocation), (±1/2, ±1/2) (1/2 vortex, single dislocation bound pair)

• Scaling dimensions: ∆p,q=π(ρsc p2+κcdw q2)/T=2 (for marginality)

• Phases: PDW, Charge 4e SC, CDW, and normal (Ising nematic)

Thursday, June 14, 12

Schematic Phase Diagram

Thursday, June 14, 12

Thursday, June 14, 12

Effects of Disorder

Thursday, June 14, 12

Effects of Disorder

• The striped SC order is very sensitive to disorder: disorder ⇒ pinned charge density wave ⇒ coupling to the phase of

the striped SC ⇒ SC “gauge” glass with zero resistance but

no Meissner effect in 3D

Thursday, June 14, 12

Effects of Disorder

• The striped SC order is very sensitive to disorder: disorder ⇒ pinned charge density wave ⇒ coupling to the phase of

the striped SC ⇒ SC “gauge” glass with zero resistance but

no Meissner effect in 3D

• Disorder induces dislocation defects in the stripe order

Thursday, June 14, 12

Effects of Disorder

• The striped SC order is very sensitive to disorder: disorder ⇒ pinned charge density wave ⇒ coupling to the phase of

the striped SC ⇒ SC “gauge” glass with zero resistance but

no Meissner effect in 3D

• Disorder induces dislocation defects in the stripe order

• Due to the coupling between stripe order and SC, ±π flux vortices are induced at the dislocation core.

Thursday, June 14, 12

Effects of Disorder

• The striped SC order is very sensitive to disorder: disorder ⇒ pinned charge density wave ⇒ coupling to the phase of

the striped SC ⇒ SC “gauge” glass with zero resistance but

no Meissner effect in 3D

• Disorder induces dislocation defects in the stripe order

• Due to the coupling between stripe order and SC, ±π flux vortices are induced at the dislocation core.

• Strict layer decoupling only allows for a magnetic coupling between randomly distributed ±π flux vortices

Thursday, June 14, 12

Effects of Disorder

• The striped SC order is very sensitive to disorder: disorder ⇒ pinned charge density wave ⇒ coupling to the phase of

the striped SC ⇒ SC “gauge” glass with zero resistance but

no Meissner effect in 3D

• Disorder induces dislocation defects in the stripe order

• Due to the coupling between stripe order and SC, ±π flux vortices are induced at the dislocation core.

• Strict layer decoupling only allows for a magnetic coupling between randomly distributed ±π flux vortices

• Novel glassy physics and “fractional” flux

Thursday, June 14, 12

Effects of Disorder

• The striped SC order is very sensitive to disorder: disorder ⇒ pinned charge density wave ⇒ coupling to the phase of

the striped SC ⇒ SC “gauge” glass with zero resistance but

no Meissner effect in 3D

• Disorder induces dislocation defects in the stripe order

• Due to the coupling between stripe order and SC, ±π flux vortices are induced at the dislocation core.

• Strict layer decoupling only allows for a magnetic coupling between randomly distributed ±π flux vortices

• Novel glassy physics and “fractional” flux

• the charge 4e SC order is unaffected by the Bragg glass of the pinned CDW

Thursday, June 14, 12

Phase Sensitive Experiments

I=J2 sin(2Δθ)

Thursday, June 14, 12

Role of Nematic Fluctuations in PDW Melting?

Thursday, June 14, 12

Role of Nematic Fluctuations in PDW Melting?

• If nematic fluctuations become strong, orders that break translational symmetry become progressively suppressed

Thursday, June 14, 12

Role of Nematic Fluctuations in PDW Melting?

• If nematic fluctuations become strong, orders that break translational symmetry become progressively suppressed

• In the absence of a lattice in 2D smectic order is not possible (at T>0) (Toner & Nelson, 1980)

Thursday, June 14, 12

Role of Nematic Fluctuations in PDW Melting?

• If nematic fluctuations become strong, orders that break translational symmetry become progressively suppressed

• In the absence of a lattice in 2D smectic order is not possible (at T>0) (Toner & Nelson, 1980)

• Coupling to the lattice breaks continuous rotational invariance to the point group of the lattice

Thursday, June 14, 12

Role of Nematic Fluctuations in PDW Melting?

• If nematic fluctuations become strong, orders that break translational symmetry become progressively suppressed

• In the absence of a lattice in 2D smectic order is not possible (at T>0) (Toner & Nelson, 1980)

• Coupling to the lattice breaks continuous rotational invariance to the point group of the lattice

• For a square lattice the point group is C4 and the nematic-isotropic transition is 2D Ising

Thursday, June 14, 12

Role of Nematic Fluctuations in PDW Melting?

• If nematic fluctuations become strong, orders that break translational symmetry become progressively suppressed

• In the absence of a lattice in 2D smectic order is not possible (at T>0) (Toner & Nelson, 1980)

• Coupling to the lattice breaks continuous rotational invariance to the point group of the lattice

• For a square lattice the point group is C4 and the nematic-isotropic transition is 2D Ising

• As the coupling to the lattice is weakened the structure of the phase diagram changes and the nematic transition is pushed to lower temperatures

Thursday, June 14, 12

Thursday, June 14, 12

PDW melting as a McMillan-de Gennes theory

• The electronic nematic order parameter is an antisymmetric traceless tensor

• Its presence amounts to a local change of the geometry, the local metric, seen by the charge 4e SC order parameter the CDW order parameter and the PDW order

• Metric tensor:

• Novel derivative couplings in the free energy

gij = �ij + ⇥Nij

Fd =Z

dx2p

detg gijn

Dcdwi �K

�� �

Dcdwj �K

+

+ (Dsci �±Q)�

Dscj �±Q

+�

D4ei �4e

�� �

D4ej �4e

o

�4e

⇢K �±Q

Dsci = ⇥i � i2eAi ± iQ �ni

Dcdwi = ⇥i + i2Q �ni

D4ei = ⇥i � i4eAi

Nij = N(n̂in̂j � �ij/2)

Thursday, June 14, 12

• Deep in the PDW phase the amplitude of the SC, CDW and nematic order parameters are fixed but their phases are not

F =Z

d2xn⌅s

2gij (⌃i⇥ � 2eAi)(⌃j⇥ � 2eAj)

+⇤

2gij (⌃i⇧ + Q�ni)(⌃j⇧ + Q�nj)

+ K1 (⇤ · �n)2 + K3 (⇤⇥ �n)2 + h|�n|2o

⇢s = |�±Q|2 + |�4e|2 = |�±Q|2 + |⇢K |2

Effective CDW stiffness reduced by gapped nematic fluctuations

�e� =�

1 + �Q2/h

Thursday, June 14, 12

Deep in the charge 4e nematic superconducting phase

• and are the orientational nematic fluctuations and SC phase fluctuations

• in the absence of orientational pinning SC (half) vortices and nematic disclinations attract each other due to the fluctuations of the local geometry (nematic fluctuations): the only topological excitations are disclinations bound to half vortices

• If the nematic fluctuations are gapped by lattice effects there is a crossover to the pinned case discussed before

• Fermionic SC quasiparticles couple to the pair field which is uncondensed in the charge 4e SC. This leads to a “pseudogap” in the quasiparticle spectrum

F =Z

d2x

⇢K|��|2 + ⇤s|�⇥|2 +

⇤sN

2(n ·�⇥)2

↵ ✓

Thursday, June 14, 12

Conclusions

• The static stripe order seen in LBCO and other LSCO related materials can be understood in terms of the PDW, a state in which charge, spin and superconducting orders are intertwined rather than competing

• This state competes with the uniform d-wave state

• Several predictions can be tested experimentally

• The observed nematic order is a state with “fluctuating stripe order”, i.e. it is a state with melted stripe order. Is the nematic state a melted PDW?

• Is the PDW peculiar to LBCO? If so why? If it is generic, why?

• A microscopic theory of the PDW is needed. This state is not accessible by a weak coupling BCS approach. Strong evidence in 1d Kondo-Heisenberg chain.

Thursday, June 14, 12

top related