Efficacy and Safety outcomes: Liposomal Amphotericin B (Ambisome) treatment for Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) under routine programme conditions in Bihar,

Post on 24-Dec-2015

221 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

Efficacy and Safety outcomes: Liposomal Amphotericin B

(Ambisome) treatment for Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) under routine programme conditions in Bihar,

India.

Jitendra Gupta MSF- Spain

Facts about VL• A major neglected disease.• Worldwide around 500,000 new cases/ year.• Only 5 countries have more than 90% of cases

(India, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sudan and Brazil).

• Leishmania donovani, Kala-Azar in Indian subcontinent.

• Fever, weight loss and enlarged spleen.• If untreated, anemia and wasting, fatal illnesses

in 95% of cases.

INDIA

Bihar background• Second poorest state of the country.• Around 60 – 75% VL cases of India are in Bihar alone.

Available Treatment Options

• Sodium Stibogluconate (SSG) • Pentamidine Isethionate • Paromomysin (also called Aminosidine)

• Miltefosine• Amphotericin B • Liposomal Amphotericin B

Liposomal Amphotericin B (Ambisome)

• Safest available drug for VL treatment.• First line treatment for VL in resource rich

settings.• Phase II studies showed: – High efficacy (89-100%). – Low safety risk.

• No phase III or IV study data available.• High cost of the drug.

MSF-Spain VL project in Bihar

Objectives

• To evaluate effectiveness of first line AmBisome, at a total dose of 20mg/kg body weight.

• To evaluate tolerability and safety of first line AmBisome treatment, at above dosage, under routine programme conditions.

Methodology• Prospectively monitored and evaluated a cohort of VL

patients. • Ambisome 20 mg/kg body weight on day 0, 1, 4 & 9

(WHO recommended, 2005).

• Inclusion: • The first 250 patients diagnosed with primary VL. • Clinically & Rk 39 dipsticks positive.

• Exclusion: • Patients previously treated with Ambisome.• Patients with relapse, <2 years, HIV or TB co-infected.

Continued…

• Safety monitoring:– Clinical assessment– Hemoglobin, Weight

• End points: – At the end of treatment (day 10).– 3-months after the treatment.– Final cure at 6-months.• Clinically well• If clinically suspected, parasitological clearance

Characteristics on Admission:Total (N) 250

Age (years) Median (range)*M: F ratio

15 (2 – 65)1.4 : 1 (145/105)

Spleen Size (cm)*Hemoglobin (gm/dl)*

6 (0 – 17)7.7 (3.6 – 14.5)

Severe malnourished**Moderate malnourished***

23 (9.2%)52 (20.8%)

Musahar cast N (%) 28 (11.2%)

Respiratory infectionsGastro-intestinal

40 (43%)33 (36%)

*For age, spleen & HB: Median (range)**Severe malnourished: BMI > 16kg/m2 or W/H <70%***Moderate malnourished: BMI 16- 18kg/m2 or W/H 70-80%

Main Adverse EventsGrade Adverse event Number

Mild Nausea, vomiting, chills, rigor, fever

41 (16.4%)

Moderate Increased tendency to bleed

3 (1.2%)

Increased back pain 4 (1.6%)

Generalized itching and swelling

5 (2%)

Severe Progressive lip swelling (Hypersensitivity)

3 (1.2%)

• No clinical or laboratory findings of Cardiac, Hepatic, Nephro and Oto-toxicities.

OutcomesAt the end of Treatment (250)

At 3-months FU248 (98%)

At 6-months FU222 (89%)

Stopped treatment due to ADR

3 0(3)* 0(3)*

Defaulters 2 0(2)* 0(2)*

Loss to follow up 0 22 19(41)*

Died 0 1 2(3)*

No. of patients remain in the follow up

245 222 201

Intention to treat (%) 98% 89% 81%

Cure Rate% (CI)** 98% (0.96-0.99%) 97% (0.94–0.99%) 96% (0.93-0.98%)

•Accumulative numbers**Confidence interval (CI 95%)

Clinical Markers for ImprovementAt the end of Treatment

At 3-months FU At 6-months FU

HB gain (gm/dl)Median (range)

0.7 (-2.7 to 3.8) 3.1 (-1 to 9.4) 3.3 (-1 to 4.2)

Spleen size regression (cm) - 5 (-1 to -14) 0* 0

Weight gain (kg) 15 years

0.64 (-3 to 7) 2 (-5 to 10) 2 (-3 to 7)

BMI (kg/m2 ) 16 years

0.2 (-0.4 to 0.7) 1.6 (-0.5 to 3.2) 1.5 (-1.2 to 4.3)

Severe malnourished

20/23 (87%) 4/23 (17%) 2/23 (8.7%)

*at 3-months follow up time, 15 patients presented with palpable spleen but clinically free from VL and 8/15 were splenic aspiration negative.

Odds Ratio (Intention to Treat)Odds Ratio (95% CI) P value

HB < 7 gm/dl 2.40 (1.02 – 5.71) .02

Musahar & Unknown cast 8.5 (1.9 – 33) .005

Severe malnutrition(BMI <16 & W/H <70%)

2.25 (0.6 – 8.2) NS

*NS: non significant

Conclusion

• Ambisome (20 mg/kg bw) shows high effectiveness (96%), under routine programme conditions.

• Extremely safe: only 0.23 adverse event per treatment.

• High tolerability.

Key Issues & Recommendations

• High drug cost.• New implementation programmes with

Ambisome 15 mg and closely monitored under field conditions should be undertaken.

• Further combination studies with Ambisome as the main drug, to be combined with other drugs, should be urgently explored.

Acknowledgements

Thank you!!

MSF SpainMSF Spain, India, HajipurRMRI, PatnaManica Balasgaram

top related