Education Metadata Meetup | Intro & Background
Post on 31-Oct-2014
447 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Transcript
Education Metadata Meetup
30 July 2014 Washington, D.C.
Education Metadata Meetup
30 July 2014 Washington, D.C.
HousekeepingProgram overview
HousekeepingProgram overview
Context - Why we’re here Enablers - Metadata & Registries Show & Tell Government Developer/Solutions Providers Content Providers/Curators Institutional users Wrap-up and Networking Lunch
HousekeepingLunch location, orders Social: #MetadataMU, #LRMI Attendee video poll Dave & Michael show @ STATS-DC
Problem StatementIt is easy to choose an instructional resource when there is only one.
Problem Statement
Increasingly more complex as there are more options to address learner needs.
Problem StatementSupport discovery and selection of the ‘right’ resource and instructional strategy
8
So, why do we need a standard?
8
So, why do we need a standard?
8
So, why do we need a standard?
Discovery and Organization
Discovery and Organization
Discovery and Organization
Discovery and Organization
Discovery and Organization
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt ISBN: 978-0-547-85282-9
Maybe Next: Monkeying with Metadata
Long History of Instructional Review & Classification
14
Metadata Types
15
DescriptiveStructural Administrative
Metadata Types
16
Descriptive Properties (title, author, publisher, # pages, etc.) Application
Structural Administrative
The LRMI Proper-es v1 (lrmi.net/
Descrip-ve Terms (Schema.org): – #tle/name – URL – descrip#on – image – about – created (date) – Creator – Publisher – inLanguage – useRightsUrl* – isBasedOnUrl
Educa-onal Terms (applica-on): – educa#onalRole – educa#onalUse – #meRequired – typicalAgeRange – interac#vityType – learningResourceType
!
Competency related: – educa#onalAlignment – educa#onalFramework – Alignment Type – targetDescrip#on – targetName – targetURL
25* part of LRMI spec but not yet adopted by schema.org
Educational Role
Administrator Mentor Parent Peer Tutor Specialist Student Teacher Team
26
Educational UseActivity!Analogies!Assessment!Auditory!Brainstorming!Classifying!Comparing!Cooperative Learning!Creative Response!Demonstration!Differentiation !Discovery Learning!Discussion/Debate!Drill & Practice!Experiential!Field Trip!Game Generating hypotheses!Guided questions Hands-on
Homework!ID similarities & differences!Inquiry!Interactive!Interview/Survey!Interviews!Introduction!Journaling !Kinesthetic!Laboratory!Lecture!Metaphors!Model & Simulation!Musical Nonlinguistic !Note taking !Peer Coaching!Peer Response!Play!Presentation
Problem Solving!Problem-based Project!Questioning !Reading!Reciprocal teaching !Reflection!Reinforcement!Research!Review!Role Playing!Service learning !Simulations!Summarizing Technology !Testing hypotheses!Thematic instruction !Visual/Spatial!Word association
27
Interactivity Type
Active Expositive Mixed
28
Typical Age Range
0-2 2-5 5-8 8-10 10-12 12-14 14-16 16-18 18+
29
Learning Resource Type
Activity Audio Broadcast Calculator Discussion E-Mail Field Trip Hands-on In-Person/Speaker
Kinesthetic Lab Material Manipulative MBL Model On-Line Podcast Presentation Printed
Robotics Still Image Video Wiki Worksheet Lesson Plan Test Quiz
30
Alignment Type
assesses teaches requires textComplexity readingLevel educationalSubject educationLevel !
31
Shifting
32
Resource Institution
Media Adopted
Learning Learner Engagement Discovered
to to to to
Move from…
Today you’ll hear about…• Government agencies that are using the LRMI and
underlying technologies • Development efforts that are underway to increase
access to and use of these metadata • How developers and aggregators of content are taking
advantage of instructional metadata • The opportunity metadata holds for improving
educational access to large content repositories
top related