Transcript
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
DMA 2006DMA 2006
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.October 16, 2006Avrick Direct, Inc.
www.LustigmanFirm.com
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Risk Management for Risk Management for Direct Marketer Suppliers Direct Marketer Suppliers ––
Avoiding Legal TrapsAvoiding Legal Traps
Andy Lustigman, Esq.Adam Solomon, Esq.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.New York, NY (212) 683-9180www.LustigmanFirm.com
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
IntroductionIntroduction
n Regulatory and Enforcement Issues n Perspective of Outside
Advertising/Regulatory Counsel to direct marketers and industry suppliers
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
What we will discuss What we will discuss todaytodayn Governmental Frameworkn Supplier Liability Exploredn Supplier Due Diligence
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Governmental FrameworkGovernmental FrameworkWho is out there?Who is out there?n Federal Trade Commissionn United State Department of Justicen United Stated Postal Servicen Food & Drug Administrationn Federal Communications Commissionn Attorneys General (NAAG)n Local Law Enforcement (District Attorneys)n Class Action Attorneys
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Who can be held liable?
n Marketersn Advertising Agenciesn Suppliers of Direct Marketers
– List Brokers / Managers– Payment Processors– Printers
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Why are Suppliers being Why are Suppliers being investigated/challenged?investigated/challenged?n Many unscrupulous marketers are based
outside U.S. n Easy for marketers to reach U.S.
consumersn “D andelion” theory – “uproot illegality” n Enforcement consequences
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
How can you be How can you be Investigated?Investigated?Informaln Complaint Lettern Access Lettern NAAG Request (individual state or
group)
Formaln Civil Investigative
Demand (CID)n Subpoenan Lawsuit (Notice/Ex Parte)
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
USPS Investigation PowersUSPS Investigation Powers
n Postal Subpoena– Administrative Subpoena for records “w hich the P ostm aster G eneral considers relevant or m aterial” to an investigation
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
CIDs/Subpoena CIDs/Subpoena ––Marketers/AgenciesMarketers/Agenciesn Provide All Advertisingn All Substantiation for Claimsn Ownership and Financial Datan Customer Lists
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
CID and Subpoena CID and Subpoena ––SuppliersSuppliersn List Broker / List Manager
– Supply the direct mail piece was sent out using the list you provided
– Telemarketing Script– Privacy Policy For Leads Generated– Who approved the rental?– Who rented? – For what uses– Revenues Received (paid to whom)
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
General Laws General Laws –– FederalFederal
n Key Federal Advertising Laws– Section 5 of the FTC Act – Enforced by the Federal Trade
Commission
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
State LawsState Laws
n S tate “L ittle F T C ” A cts– Premised on Section 5 of the FTC Act
nEnforced by State AGsnNew York GBL 349nCal B&P 17500
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Postal LawsPostal Laws
n Section 3005 – False Representations/Lottery
n Enforced by the USPSn Prohibits false or deceptive representations
made in an attempt to obtain money or property through the mail
n Enhanced by the DMPEA
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
SummarySummary
n Prohibit false and deceptive advertising / mailings– Truth in Advertising– Adequate Substantiation– Unfair acts or practices
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Supplier LiabilitySupplier Liability
“knew or should have know n”Aid and Abet“W illful B lindness”Section 1345Mail and Wire Fraud
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Supplier LiabilitySupplier Liability
n Telemarketing Sales Rule – “knew or should have know n”– The List Broker Cases
n Internet Marketingn Telemarketing
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Governmental Challenges Governmental Challenges
n Lawsuit – Notice pleadingsn Ex Parte application and asset freezes
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
FTC List Manager CasesFTC List Manager Cases
n List Sellers Settle FTC Charges That They Aided in Illegal Marketing of Advance Fee Credit Products (2004)– Guidestar (Carney) - $25,000– ListData - $100,000 – NeWorld - $62,500
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
List Manager SettlementsList Manager Settlements
n Prohibition on Assisting & Facilitating:– Deceptive telemarketing acts or practices– Credit Card Laundering– Deceptive acts or practices in the
solicitation of charitable contributions– Abusive Conduct
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
List Manager SettlementsList Manager Settlements
n Deceptive telemarketing acts or practices– Disclosure of all costs prior to payment
information– Misrepresenting or omitting any material
aspect of the offer– Negative option features
n Express Verifiable authorization– Dates, amount, name, customer service #, date
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
List Manager SettlementsList Manager Settlements
n Credit Card Launderingn U sing another’s m erchant account
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
List Manager SettlementsList Manager Settlements
n Abusive Acts– Advance Fee Credit or Credit Repair– Transmitting unencrypted account infoPreacquired Account Sales: identify account
being charged, express agreementFree to Pay Conversions: recording of
entire call, obtain last 4 digits
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
List Manager SettlementsList Manager Settlements
n A busive A cts (con’t)– Do Not Call Compliance (registration &
download)– Call abandonment (3% per day per
campaign)– Calling time restrictions
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
AT&T Sues Data BrokersAT&T Sues Data Brokers
n AT&T filed suit to identify 25 data brokers who it claims fraudulently obtained phone records for about 25,000 customers
n AT&T claims data brokers posed as customers to get confidential information that they then used to set up unauthorized online accounts
n August 2006
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Assisting & Facilitating Assisting & Facilitating
n FTC v. Entrepreneurial Strategies (2006)– First FTC case to result in civil penalties from
parties that helped telemarketers avoid complying with the DNC Registry
– Received money from Debt Management Foundation Services which it helped evade compliance with the TSR by assisting it in organizing and operating as a sham non-profit
– Civil Penalty: $13,454
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Telemarketer Pays the Price for Telemarketer Pays the Price for U sing U nscrubbed “Lead List”U sing U nscrubbed “Lead List”
n FTC v. Executive Financial Home Loan Corp. (2006)– A mortgage broker settled charges with the FTC
for allegedly calling tens of thousands of consumer on the National DNC
– Defendants claimed they relied on service providers for their compliance with the DNC rules
– FT C ’s position it w as not enough for them to rely on the brokers’ claim s
– Civil Penalty: $50,000
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Privacy Policy Liability Privacy Policy Liability ––List Manager / PublisherList Manager / Publishern Datran Media: Gratis Internet
(myfreeipod.com) represented that it would "never lend, sell or give out for any reason" the information provided by users.
n Gratis sold 7 million files to Datran Media,n Datran sent millions of unsolicited e-mails to
the list
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Datran CaseDatran Case
n NY AG investigated Datran- Assurance of Discontinuance– $1.1 million ($750K as penalty)– Injunctive Provisions
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Datran CaseDatran Case
n Destruction of data from Gratis n Bar on acquiring personal consumer
information without first independently confirming that such acquisition is permissible under relevant seller privacy policies; and
n Appoint a Chief Privacy Officer or other employee to oversee privacy compliance efforts.
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Datran CaseDatran Case
– Injunctive Provisions:n Independently review privacy policies in
effect at time of data collectionn Independently confirm that privacy policies
represented sharing or if no representation, there is opt in to permit sharing
n Retain copies for 5 years of privacy policiesn Written representation from list owner
insufficient
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Datran CaseDatran Case
n NY AG now after Gratisn Separate action brought against Gratis
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Gambling/Lottery Gambling/Lottery Illegal ConductIllegal Conductn Risk of Aiding Abetting; RICOn Direct Charge of Mail Fraud and Wire
Fraud
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Ad Agencies and Executives Caught Ad Agencies and Executives Caught in Internet Gambling Crackdownin Internet Gambling Crackdown
n BetOnSports CEO David Carruthers arrestedn Included in the indictment were criminal
charges against lesser-known companies --Direct Mail Expertise Inc., DME Global Marketing and Fulfillment Inc. and Mobile Promotions Inc.
n Government charged the advertising agencies and individuals who owned and operated them
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Payment ProcessorsPayment Processors
n United States v. Payment Processing Center (ED Pa 2006)– Ex Parte Asset Freeze and TRO – Payment processing supplier to
telemarketers and direct mail companies– Marketers not sued by government– Potential liability for facilitating
transactions
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Payment Processor CasesPayment Processor Cases
n “W illful B lindness”n Knew or Should Have Knownn Independent verification of lawful
business transactions
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
W hy M e, I D idn’t V iolate W hy M e, I D idn’t V iolate The Law?The Law?n Government has taken a new, more
expansive and aggressive rolen Liability even though act is only to
arrange the transactionn Could not occur without broker /
managern The Dandelion Theory
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
How Can I Protect My How Can I Protect My Business?Business?What steps should a supplier reasonably take?
Not a guarantor of non-illegalityBut, must take active responsibility for
who you transact with
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Supplier Due DiligenceSupplier Due Diligence
n Exposure NOT limited to telemarketing clients
n Email and direct mail campaigns create exposure
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Regulatory ExposureRegulatory Exposure
n FTC recognizes that list managers and other suppliers are not guarantors of marketers
n B ut “knew or should have know n” standard
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Supplier Due DiligenceSupplier Due Diligence
– Undertake sufficient due diligence to reasonably assure that promotion is not fraudulent or promoting illegal conductn Review marketing/fulfillment materialsn Claim Substantiationn Legal Opinions?n Scripts and Fulfillmentn SAN Registration
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
DMA GuidanceDMA Guidance
n DMA Guidelines – October 2004“ascertain the nature of the list’s intended usage of each materially different marketing use prior to rental, sale, exchange, transfer or use of the list”
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
DMA Guidance to List DMA Guidance to List IndustryIndustryHigher exposure for liability if:-Not looking at marketing materials-Not knowing the client
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
DMA Guidance to List DMA Guidance to List IndustryIndustryEnforcement liability where:n Knowingly collaborating on an illegal offer or
violation (know or willful blindness)n Processing orders where there are
recognizable misrepresentations or illegal conduct
n Not acting on information that an offer or marketer is fraudulent/deceptive
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
DMA GuidanceDMA Guidance
n Knowledgeable person review marketing materials– Obvious fraud– Too good to be true?
n Outrageous weight lossn Hot button health – Cancer, AIDSn Credit-Repair/Advance Fee Loansn Unbelievable Inexpensive Travel Offersn Government Endorsement
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
DMA GuidanceDMA Guidance
n Know Your Customer– Affirmative obligation to not to do
business with someone who is obviously breaking the law
– Prior regulatory history; relationship to current offer
– Ability to provide customer service
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Privacy Policy / Due Privacy Policy / Due DiligenceDiligencen W hat does the com pany’s privacy
policy say (online / offline)?n What happens with the data that it
collectsn Are they the same?n Privacy policies to be truthfuln Verify that data use is consistent with
privacy policies which acquired data
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Do Not MailDo Not Mail
n Growing movement supports legislation for a Do Not Mail registry– Massachusetts, Missouri and New York
n The DMA opposes the creation of these registries
n The DM industry needs to take note to prevent unnecessary legislation
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.The Lustigman Firm, P.C.
Questions?Questions?
Thank you!Andy Lustigman, Esq.
The Lustigman Firm, P.C.New York, NY
(212) 683-9180www.LustigmanFirm.com
andy@LFirm.com
top related