Current Performance and Future Possibilities of HERA
Post on 14-Jan-2016
34 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Transcript
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de
7 July 2001
Georg Hoffstaetter (DESY, Hamburg)
Current Performanceand Future Possibilities of HERA
ZEUSHERAH1 (318 GeV)
HERA-B (42 GeV)
HERMES (7 GeV)
PETRA
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.de
HERA and its Pre-Accelerator Chain
H1
ZEUS
HERMES
HERA-B HERA
PETRA
778 m
6336 m long
DE
SY Polarized Electrons
Protons
Protons Electrons
20 keV Source Source 150 keV750 keV RFQ Linac II 450 MeV50 MeV Linac III Pia 450 MeV
8 GeV DESY III DESY II 7 GeV40 GeV PETRA PETRA 12 GeV
920 GeV HERA-p HERA-e 27.5 GeV
Georg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
July August September October Nov ember0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
February March April Mai Juni Juli August
HERA: Improvements 1999/2000
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
9-Jul 3-Aug 28-Aug 22-Sep 17-Oct 11-Nov 6-Dec 31-Dec
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
31-Dec 25-Jan 19-Feb 15-Mar 9-Apr 4-May 29-May 23-Jun 18-Jul 12-Aug 6-Sep
andBeam current:e p
mA 1999 2000
Average peak luminosity ( )1999 2000
123010 scm
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
HERA: Efficiency 1999/2000
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
January February March April Mai Juni Juli August0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
July August September October Nov ember
1999 2000
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Development of the Luminosity
Inte
grat
ed L
umin
osity
(1/
pb)
HERA Luminosity 1993-2000
Linear increase of the integrated Luminosity
The time for a luminosity upgrade of HERA has come
Days after start of run
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Specific Luminosity and Polarization
%
55
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
31-D
ec
25-J
an
19-F
eb
15-M
ar
9-A
pr
4-M
ay
29-M
ay
23-J
un
18-J
ul
12-A
ug
6-S
ep
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
9-Ju
l
3-A
ug
28-A
ug
22-S
ep
17-O
ct
11-N
ov
6-D
ec
31-D
ec
specific luminosity ( )2122910 mAscm
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
The HERA Lumi-Upgrade
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Concept of HERA IRs
m
• Beam separation by super-conducting magnets in the detectors
• e-bending radius reduced from 1200 m to 400 m
• More radiation power: 28 kW, critical Energy = 150 kV
• Radiation passes the detector, absorbers at 11, 19, and 25 m
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Th e Detec to r R
e gion
courtesy B.Holzer courtesy B.Holzer
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
4 super-conducting magnets ( BNL ) [6 MDM]
56 normal-conducting magnets
(Eframov Inst.) [6 MDM]
448 m UH Vacuum
system [6 MDM]
Absorbers, instrumentation,
controls, stands, … [6 MDM]
New Components
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Superconducting Magnet GO
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Superconducting Magnet GO
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
One Pipe - Three Beams
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Synchrotron Radiation Absorber
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Parameters
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Potential Problems
Dynamic Aperture OK? Polarization OK?, Luminosity OK? Can HERA be handled well?
Polarization OK?, Luminosity OK?
Too strong beam-beam force on p? Too strong beam-beam force on e?
Focusing:
fRF increase:
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
The Luminosity was initially too small: Lumiscan
Emittance and Lumi for 72° Optic
)60( sL
)60( sL )72( sL
)72( sL
)(mmx )(mmx)(mmy )(mmy
Bunch has no product distribution: )()( yx coupling
)72( sL
)72( sL
x
y
Luminosity with 72° is large as expected
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Dynamic Aperture for 72° Optic
The kick where half the current is lost leads to a satisfactory dynamic aperture.
Kickx
x´ V2(kV)
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Polarization was in the spin matched 72° optic quickly brought to 63% (one day).
Harmonic bumps were immediately effective Decoupling bumps worked well
60%
PolarizationIe
Polarization for 72° Optic
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
6 more measurements indicate For the center frequency , the
luminosity is increased as expected
Luminosity for fRF IncreaseLL
RFf RFf
HzfZentrum 175
HzfZentrum 175
HzfZentrum 175HzfZentrum 0
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Ls is independent of e-current Tp depends on e-current Tails depend on
e-current
Too Strong Beam-Beam Force on p?16mA 73mACorresponding e-current after upgrade
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Too Strong Beam-Beam Force on e?
No reduction of Ls by the second experiment
No reduction of Ls by a larger -funktionen
Ls
Ippb
So far no reduction of Ls by the
bunch current
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
• beam-beam tune shift for e and p
• hourglass effect for protons
• background due to synchrotron radiation and scattered e
• dynamic aperture of electrons
Limits for the Lumi Upgrade
m
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
)(mey
measureds,L
Where are the Beam-Beam Limits?
Upgrade and Ip=140mA: emittance starts to grow
)(mey
yQ2
xQ2
)(mey
emeasuredx,
emeasuredy ,
)(mey
)( ,ecalcys L
measureds,L
)( ,emeasuredys L
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Lumi Reduction by Hourglass Effect
)(cmpy
ep
75.1)5.12(
0L
L cmpyLength 19cm:
12cm: 9.1)5.12(
0L
L cmpy
Luminosity ( )3210
20cm
bunch length: 6cm
30cm
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Tuneshift Change by Hourglass Effect
m
mm
mm
mpx 45.2
mpy 18.0
mex 63.0
mey 26.0
Protons Electrons
Horizontal: grows slowerpx Vertical: grows fasterpy
py
py s
)(px
px s
)(
pss / pss /
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Tune Shift with Bunch Length Effect
How will the tune shift parameters change and have these been analyzed by accelerator experiments ?
)(spx
)(spy
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Bunch Length Dependent Resonances 6Qx+4Qy Resonance
pss /pss /
10Qy Resonance
JpyJpyJpxJpx
For maximum For maximum
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Resonances with Bunch Length EffectHow will the resonance strength change and have these been analyzed by accelerator experiments ?
All large resonance strength are due to the proton bunch length
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Nominal and Ultimate Parameters
The performance goal of HERA is not unrealistic and should not be too hard to achieve.
A shortfall of beam intensity in the short term can be compensated.
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Spin-Orbit Tracking with Quaternions
Computation of the invariant spin field by
analyzing tracking data:
Fourier analysis Stroboscopic averaging Antidamping
Computations performed in SPRINT, Hoffstaetter and Vogt, DESY/00
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
High Order Resonance Strength
Tracked depolarization as expected
Resonances up to 19th order can be observed
Resonance strength can be determined from tune jump.
Spin tune )(lim znP
Computations performed in SPRINT, Hoffstaetter and Vogt, DESY/00
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
Increasing the Proton CurrentPETRA: N=60, 50 MHz 10 MHz & 5 MHz
10 MHz & 5 MHzN=30, 50 MHz
Georg.Hoffstaetter@DESY.deGeorg.Hoffstaetter@desy.de
TESLA with Röntgen FEL
Damping RingTunnel
Super-conducting Positron Linac
Wiggler for thePositron Source
Detector and Experimental Area
Cryogenic Halls
Super-conducting Electron Linac
Röntgen FEL
top related