Consolidated 1028/Preliminary Determination Hearing · Consolidated 1028/Preliminary Determination Hearing DECEMBER 9, 2008 12/5/2008 1 1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 1
Post on 05-Jul-2020
5 Views
Preview:
Transcript
Consolidated 1028/Preliminary Determination Hearingg
DECEMBER 9, 2008
12/5/2008 1
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 1
Guide to Information
Our web site is: www.centergrove.k12.in.usGo to our web siteOn the home page, look under “News at Center Grove “and click on “Center Grove Construction Projects”
For historical information about curriculum redesign:Click on “High School Redesign Page”
For historical information about the development of the budget and specifications for this construction project:
Click on “Building Projects Budget/Financial”
For the most current information about the construction projects (including this 1028 hearing):
Click on “Most Current Project Information”
12/8/2008 3
If you have questions or would like more information, please contact:
Guide to Information (Continued)
information, please contact:
Dr. Steven Stephanoff, SuperintendentEmail: stephanoffs@centergrove.k12.in.us
Phone: 317-881-9326
Mail: 4800 W. Stones Crossing Rd., Greenwood, In 46143
Dr. Paul Gabriel, Chief Financial Officer,Email: gabrielp@centergrove.k12.in.us
Phone: 317-881-9326
Mail: 4800 W. Stones Crossing Rd., Greenwood, In 46143
12/8/2008 4
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 2
History
DR. JANET BOYLE
12/8/2008 5
2002 Facilities Advisory CommitteeRecommended relocation of transportation & maintenance facilities
Prior Studies and Reports
off the high school campus & further study of high school needs.
2004 Facilities Advisory CommitteeLed to decision to replace Maple Grove Elementary School with a new facility located off the high school campus. Board affirmed remaining with one high school for the district. Board asked for study of best means to personalize a large school .
2005 - 2006 High School Expansion Task Force2005 2006 High School Expansion Task ForceIdentified facility needs and researched leading trends in high school education. Recommended a larger community-based study of possible high school program re-design. Ruled out freshmen or senior academies as viable options for CGHS.
612/8/2008
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 3
Prior Studies and Reports
2006 Coalition of Visioneers193 people from the Center Grove community participated in 93 p p y p pfour focus study groups to identify key issues for possible re-design of high school program.
The four study groups were:Community ConnectionsCampus Master PlanTransitionsProgram Models and Curriculum
Each study group made recommendations which were Each study group made recommendations, which were compiled by the Coalition Advisory Council into one set of Coalition recommendations.
One recommendation was that additional study occur involving more high school staff.
712/8/2008
Prior Studies and Reports
2007 - 2008 High School Re-Design TeamPaul Buck appointed as Assistant Principal at CGHS to lead the Paul Buck appointed as Assistant Principal at CGHS to lead the Curriculum Re-Design Team, which studied various options and recommended restructuring the high school into small learning communities:
New Technology High School
Early College High School
Business Academy
STEM Academy
Health SLCHealth SLC
Humanities SLC
Traditional SLC
This meets the requirements of the 2004 Board directive regarding personalizing the high school.
812/8/2008
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 4
Prior Studies and Reports
2005 - 2008 Site Visits and ConferencesDuring the various studies, groups from our school community have
d d h f ll i f d i i d h “b i ” attended the following conferences and visited these “best practice” example schools:
Conferences:Indiana’s Future: Economic Development and the High School Connection (CELL 2005)Breaking Ranks II: 2006 High School Showcase (The Educational Alliance at Brown University, 2006)Indiana High School ReDesign – The Future is Here (CELL 2007)Indiana High School Summit: ReDesigning Indiana’s High School: Version 3.0 (IDoE 2007)15th Annual Model Schools Conference (International Center for Leadership in Education 2007)The Hope Foundation International Conference (The Hope Foundation 2007)Indiana’s Future Conference (CELL 2007)Indiana s Future Conference (CELL 2007)Site Visits:Napa New Technology High School (Napa, CA)Sacramento New Technology High School (Sacramento, CA)Mapleton / Front Range Early College High School (Denver, CO)Global Leadership Academy – Grades K-12 (Denver, CO)Littleton High School (Littleton, CO)
12/8/2008 9
Prior Studies and Reports
2005 - 2008 Site Visits (Continued)
Mapleton Expeditionary School of the Arts (MESA) Grades 7-12 (Denver, CO)New Vista High School (Boulder, CO)Rocky Mountain School of Expeditionary Learning (Denver, CO)Skyview Academy (Thornton, CO)The Denver School of Science and Technology (Denver, CO)Welby New Technology High School (Denver, CO)Ben Davis High School (Indianapolis, IN)Carmel High School (Carmel, IN)Decatur Township High School (Indianapolis, IN)p g ( p , )Franklin Community High School (Franklin, IN)Fishers High School (Fishers, IN)Hamilton Southeastern Community High School (Fishers, IN)New Technology High School at Arsenal Tech (Indianapolis, IN)
12/8/2008 10
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 5
Prior Studies and Reports
2005 - 2008 Site Visits (Continued)
Warren Central High School (Indianapolis, IN)Atascoscita High School (Humble, TX)Challenge Early College High School (Houston, TX)Humble High School (Humble, TX)Kingwood High School (Kingwood, TX)Kingwood Park High School (Kingwood, TX)Quest High School (Humble, TX)Manhattan / Hunter Science High School (New York City, NY)S i T h l d R h E l C ll Hi h S h l (B kl NY)Science, Technology and Research Early College High School (Brooklyn, NY)Queens School of Inquiry (Queens, NY)Academy for Math, Engineering & Science (AMES) (Salt Lake City, UT)Itineris Early College High School (West Jordan, UT)Northern Utah Academy for Math, Engineering & Science (NUAMES) (Layton, UT)
12/8/2008 11
Proposed Implementation of Small Learning Communities
2009-10 : Early College High School2010-11: New Tech High School
1 or 2 others2011-12: 2 or 3 others
12/8/2008 12
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 6
Description of the Three Projects
MR. DAVE STATLER
12/8/2008 13
Elementary
Construction Project - $142.36M
22%
59%
15%4%
y$30.85M
High School (Basic) $84.21M
HS Co-curricular $20.90M$20.90M
Extra-curricular $6.40M
12/8/2008 14
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 7
Cen
ter G
rove
Com
mun
ity S
choo
l Cor
pora
tion
Scho
ol F
inan
cing
Bud
get
Hun
t Con
stru
ctio
n G
roup
, Inc
.11
/19/
08
Bui
ldin
g Ar
ea:
352,
712
GSF
Scho
ol F
inan
cing
Bud
get
AB
CD
EF
GH
IJ
KL
M
N
O
Sect
ion
Des
crip
tion:
Hig
h Sc
hool
Ad
ditio
ns
Hig
h Sc
hool
R
enov
atio
ns
Ear
ly S
ite
Dev
elop
men
t Vi
ctor
y C
onn.
, Pe
nn. C
onn.
, D
emo
Mai
nt.
Bld
g., D
emo
Map
le G
rove
Bal
ance
of
Site
D
evel
opm
ent
Hig
h Sc
hool
& S
ite
Dev
elop
men
t TO
TALS
A
dditi
onal
M
usic
Spa
ce
Nat
ator
ium
&
Wei
ghts
New
Loc
ker
Roo
m F
acili
ty
& N
ew T
urf a
t So
ccer
Fie
ld
Nor
th o
f C.G
. El
emen
tary
New
Foo
tbal
l Pr
ess
Box
&
Gra
ndst
ands
New
Res
troo
m
/ Con
cess
ion
/ Ad
mis
sion
Fa
cilit
y at
B
aseb
all F
ield
New
Ten
nis
Cou
rts
/ R
esur
faci
ng
Exis
ting
Tenn
is
Cou
rts/
New
At
hlet
ic
Prac
tice
Fiel
d
Hig
h Sc
hool
Co-
Cur
ricul
ar &
Ext
ra-
Cur
ricul
ar
Impr
ovem
ents
TO
TALS
Cen
ter G
rove
El
emen
tary
2
011
New
El
emen
tary
E
lem
enta
ry P
rogr
am
TOTA
LS
Sec
tion
Qua
ntity
(GS
F):
245,
182
112,
310
352,
712
16,5
0056
,130
107,
800
Cos
t Per
GS
F- B
ase
Est
imat
e D
etai
l Sub
tota
l18
3.42
$
10
0.95
$
24
3.52
$
22
2.85
$
177.
80$
Bas
e Es
timat
e D
etai
l Sub
tota
l44
,970
,178
$
11
,338
,095
$
2,
859,
980
$
4,39
3,77
4$
63,5
62,0
27$
4,01
8,08
2$
12,5
08,3
63$
1,57
0,90
0$
2,07
5,00
0$
312,
500
$
1,07
1,73
2$
21,5
56,5
77$
Est
imat
e/S
cope
Con
tinge
ncy
5.00%
####
1,12
4,25
4$
283,
452
$
71
,500
$
109,
844
$
1,58
9,05
1$
20
0,90
4$
62
5,41
8$
78,5
45$
103,
750
$
15,6
25$
53,5
87$
1,07
7,82
9$
-
$
-
$
-
$
Es
timat
e Su
btot
al46
,094
,432
$
11
,621
,547
$
2,
931,
480
$
4,50
3,61
8$
65,1
51,0
78$
4,21
8,98
6$
13,1
33,7
81$
1,64
9,44
5$
2,17
8,75
0$
328,
125
$
1,12
5,31
9$
22,6
34,4
06$
5,86
7,44
4$
19
,166
,709
$
25
,034
,153
$
C
onst
ruct
ion
Con
tinge
ncy
5.00%
2,30
4,72
2$
581,
077
$
14
6,57
4$
225,
181
$
3,25
7,55
4$
21
0,94
9$
65
6,68
9$
82,4
72$
108,
938
$
16,4
06$
56,2
66$
1,13
1,72
0$
28
0,13
6$
366,
511
$
64
6,64
7$
Gen
eral
Con
ditio
ns &
Req
uire
men
ts3.3
0%1,
521,
116
$
38
3,51
1$
96,7
39$
14
8,61
9$
2,
149,
986
$
139,
227
$
433,
415
$
54
,432
$
71
,899
$
10
,828
$
37
,136
$
74
6,93
5$
-$
200,
000
$
20
0,00
0$
Con
tract
or's
Gen
eral
Lia
bilit
y In
sura
nce
21,2
61$
5,36
0$
1,
352
$
2,
077
$
30
,051
$
1,
946
$
6,05
8$
76
1$
1,
005
$
15
1$
51
9$
10
,440
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
Su
btot
al G
C a
nd C
ontin
genc
y3,
847,
099
$
96
9,94
9$
244,
665
$
37
5,87
8$
5,
437,
590
$
352,
122
$
1,09
6,16
2$
13
7,66
5$
18
1,84
1$
27
,386
$
93
,920
$
1,
889,
096
$
280,
136
$
56
6,51
1$
846,
647
$
Subt
otal
Dire
ct a
nd G
C49
,941
,531
$
12
,591
,496
$
3,
176,
144
$
4,87
9,49
6$
70,5
88,6
68$
4,57
1,10
8$
14,2
29,9
43$
1,78
7,11
0$
2,36
0,59
1$
355,
511
$
1,21
9,23
9$
24,5
23,5
02$
6,14
7,58
0$
19
,733
,220
$
25
,880
,800
$
C
onst
ruct
ion
Man
ager
's F
ee1.2
0%59
9,29
8$
15
1,09
8$
38
,114
$
58,5
54$
84
7,06
4$
54
,853
$
17
0,75
9$
21,4
45$
28
,327
$
4,26
6$
14,6
31$
29
4,28
2$
61,4
76$
390,
664
$
45
2,14
0$
Con
stru
ctio
nEs
timat
eTo
tal
5054
083
0$
1274
259
4$
321
425
8$
493
805
0$
7143
573
2$
462
596
1$
1440
070
2$
180
855
5$
238
891
8$
359
777
$1
233
870
$24
817
784
$6
209
056
$20
123
884
$26
332
940
$
ELE
MEN
TAR
Y PR
OG
RAM
H
IGH
SC
HO
OL
CO
-CU
RR
ICU
LAR
& E
XTR
A-C
UR
RIC
ULA
R IM
PRO
VEM
ENTS
HIG
H S
CH
OO
L B
ASE
PRO
JEC
T
Con
stru
ctio
n Es
timat
e To
tal
50,5
40,8
30$
12,7
42,5
94$
3,21
4,25
8$
4,
938,
050
$
71
,435
,732
$
4,
625,
961
$
14
,400
,702
$
1,
808,
555
$
2,
388,
918
$
35
9,77
7$
1,
233,
870
$
24
,817
,784
$
6,
209,
056
$
20,1
23,8
84$
26,3
32,9
40$
SOFT
CO
STA
rchi
tect
/ E
ngin
eer F
ee5.7
5%2,
906,
098
$
73
2,69
9$
184,
820
$
28
3,93
8$
4,
107,
555
$
265,
993
$
828,
040
$
10
3,99
2$
13
7,36
3$
20
,687
$
70
,948
$
1,
427,
023
$
368,
855
$
73
2,49
6$
1,10
1,35
1$
A
/E R
eim
burs
able
Con
sulta
nts
and
Exp
ense
s12
2,00
0$
-
$
136,
000
$
22
4,00
0$
48
2,00
0$
6,00
0$
26
,000
$
15,0
00$
10,0
00$
6,00
0$
18,0
00$
81,0
00$
-$
-$
-$
Ow
ner's
Bui
lder
's R
isk
Insu
ranc
e0.2
0%10
1,08
2$
25
,485
$
21
,782
$
36,0
18$
184,
367
$
9,
252
$
28,8
01$
3,
617
$
4,
778
$
72
0$
2,
468
$
49
,636
$
12
,295
$
39
,066
$
51
,361
$
O
n/O
ff-S
ite U
tiliti
es ($
2,00
0,00
0 at
50%
)1,
000,
000
$
-
$
-$
-$
1,
000,
000
$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
La
nd A
cqui
sitio
n-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
S
yste
ms
Com
mis
sion
ing
300,
000
$
-$
-
$
-
$
300,
000
$
5,
000
$
15,0
00$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
20
,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
G
eote
chni
cal I
nves
tigat
ion,
Sur
veys
, Ow
ner's
Tes
ting
100,
000
$
-$
9,
421
$
15
,579
$
12
5,00
0$
-$
-
$
1,
000
$
1,
000
$
1,
000
$
2,
500
$
5,
500
$
10,0
00$
35,0
00$
45,0
00$
Ow
ner's
Pro
ject
Rep
rese
ntat
ive
200,
000
$
-$
-
$
-
$
200,
000
$
-
$
-$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
-$
50,0
00$
50,0
00$
Doc
umen
t Prin
ting
200,
000
$
-$
25
,000
$
-$
22
5,00
0$
-$
-
$
1,
000
$
1,
000
$
1,
000
$
1,
000
$
4,
000
$
15,0
00$
25,0
00$
40,0
00$
Ow
ner's
Loo
se E
quip
men
t2.0
0%1,
010,
817
$
25
4,85
2$
5,65
3$
9,34
7$
1,28
0,66
8$
75
,000
$
35
,000
$
5,00
0$
5,00
0$
3,00
0$
2,00
0$
125,
000
$
75
,000
$
15
0,00
0$
225,
000
$
O
wne
r's In
stru
ctio
nal/I
nfor
mat
ion
Tech
nolo
gy3.0
0%2,
520,
000
$
-
$
-$
-$
2,
520,
000
$
6,00
0$
6,
000
$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
12,0
00$
300,
000
$
58
5,00
0$
885,
000
$
G
raph
ics
and
Art
Wor
k0.0
8%37
,906
$
9,
557
$
3,76
9$
6,23
1$
57,4
63$
-$
-
$
-
$
10,0
00$
2,50
0$
1,00
0$
13,5
00$
-$
100,
000
$
10
0,00
0$
Sta
ff P
rofe
ssio
nal D
evel
opm
ent t
o Tr
ansi
tion
to S
LC's
-$
-
$
-$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
-$
-$
-$
Mis
cella
neou
s0.0
5%25
,270
$
6,
371
$
2,
174
$
3,60
6$
37,4
22$
-$
-
$
904
$
1,19
4$
180
$
-$
2,
279
$
-$
-$
-$
Sub
Tota
l: So
ft C
osts
8,52
3,17
2$
1,02
8,96
4$
38
8,61
9$
578,
719
$
10,5
19,4
75$
367,
245
$
938,
842
$
13
0,51
3$
17
0,33
5$
35
,087
$
97
,916
$
1,
739,
937
$
781,
150
$
1,
716,
562
$
2,49
7,71
2$
Sub
Tota
l: C
onst
ruct
ion
Cos
t and
Sof
t Cos
ts59
,064
,002
$
13
,771
,559
$
3,
602,
877
$
5,51
6,76
9$
81,9
55,2
07$
4,99
3,20
6$
15,3
39,5
44$
1,93
9,06
8$
2,55
9,25
3$
394,
863
$
1,33
1,78
6$
26,5
57,7
21$
6,99
0,20
6$
21
,840
,446
$
28
,830
,652
$
CO
ST O
F IS
SUAN
CE
Sch
ool C
ouns
el-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
75,0
00$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
25
,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
B
ond
Cou
nsel
-$
-
$
-$
-$
17
5,00
0$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
50
,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
Tr
uste
e B
ank
-$
-
$
-$
-$
7,
500
$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
2,
500
$
-$
-$
-$
Sta
ndar
d &
Poo
r's R
atin
g-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
75,0
00$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
25
,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
O
ffici
al S
tate
men
t-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
20,0
00$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
10
,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
U
nder
writ
ers
Dis
coun
t-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
385,
000
$
-
$
-$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
60,0
00$
-$
-$
-$
Bon
d In
sura
nce
Pre
miu
m-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
B
ond
Del
iver
y-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
75,0
00$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
25
,000
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
Ti
tle In
sura
nce
-$
-
$
-$
-$
40
,000
$
-
$
-$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
20,0
00$
-$
-$
-$
$$
$$
$$
$$
$$
$$
$$
$M
isce
llane
ous
- DTC
, CU
SIP
-$
-
$
-$
-$
7,
500
$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
2,50
0$
-
$
-
$
-
$
TO
TAL
CO
STS
OF
ISSU
ANC
E-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
860,
000
$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
220,
000
$
13
5,00
0$
270,
000
$
40
5,00
0$
CAP
ITAL
IZED
INTE
RES
TIn
tere
st E
xpen
se-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
2,59
4,79
3$
-
$
-$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
867,
279
$
49
,794
$
2,
139,
554
$
2,18
9,34
8$
(L
ess
Inte
rest
Inco
me)
-$
-
$
-$
-$
(1
,200
,000
)$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
(3
50,0
00)
$
(75,
000)
$
(5
00,0
00)
$
(575
,000
)$
(L
ess
Inte
rim R
ent P
aym
ents
-$
-
$
-$
-$
-
$
-
$
-$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
-$
-$
-$
NET
CAP
ITAL
IZED
INTE
RES
T-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
1,39
4,79
3$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
51
7,27
9$
(25,
206)
$
1,
639,
554
$
1,61
4,34
8$
TOTA
L C
OST
OF
ISSU
ANC
E &
CAP
ITAL
IZED
INTE
RES
T-
$
-$
-
$
-
$
2,25
4,79
3$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
-
$
-$
73
7,27
9$
109,
794
$
1,
909,
554
$
2,01
9,34
8$
GR
AND
TO
TALS
59,0
64,0
02$
13,7
71,5
59$
3,60
2,87
7$
5,51
6,76
9$
84
,210
,000
$
4,99
3,20
6$
15
,339
,544
$ 1,
939,
068
$ 2,
559,
253
$ 39
4,86
3$
1,
331,
786
$ 27
,295
,000
$
7,10
0,00
0$
23
,750
,000
$
30,8
50,0
00$
GR
AND
TO
TAL
OF
ALL
PRO
JEC
TS14
2,35
5,00
0$
Pag
e 1
of 1
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 8
$ 30,850,000
Elementary School Program
M N O
ELEMENTARY PROGRAM
Center Grove Elementary 2011 New Elementary Elementary Program TOTALS
12/8/2008 15
Elementary School Project
Build new elementary school on Sugar Grove property to accommodate 750 studentsproperty to accommodate 750 students
Utilize a design similar to Maple Grove Elementary School Consolidate operations of North Grove and West Grove Elementary Schools into new building and existing elementary schoolsAchieve equity among elementary programs and buildingsgCurrent annual savings of approx. $338,000 in personnel expensesSavings of $ 3.9 million to the Capital Projects Fund through 2020
12/8/2008 16
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 9
Elementary School Project (Cont.)
Construct 25,200 square feet Addition to Center Grove Elementary
Renovate the School to Accommodate 750 Students
hi i i h ildi i i iAchieve Equity with Newer Buildings in District
Add 5 classrooms and new restrooms
Add new kitchen, cafeteria, gymnasium and stage
Add secure entry and reconfigure administration area
Renovate vacated interior spaces to include science lab, new media center, additional computer lab, LD resource rooms, and , p , ,teacher work areas
Renovate existing restrooms
Renovate finishes in existing classrooms
12/8/2008 17
$ 84,210,000
High School Base Project
A B C D E
HIGH SCHOOL BASE PROJECT
Existing High School Additions High School Renovations
Early Site Development Victory Conn., Penn. Conn., Demo Maint.
Bldg., Demo Maple Grove
Balance of Site Development
High School & Site Development TOTALS
12/8/2008 18
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 10
Building Components
Addresses existing concerns of safety, circulation and over-crowding of high school and provides for future g g pexpansion
Constructs a major north-south concourse and extends Hall of Excellence
Adds classrooms to accommodate approximately 2800 students
Adds instructional and practice areas for Fine Arts and M i di i liMusic disciplines
Adds new secure public entry and relocates Administration and Guidance areas
Relocates Special Services area for improved access
12/8/2008 19
Building Components (cont.)
Adds new food preparation and serving areas
Adds a PE/Health Center with classrooms to allow for Adds a PE/Health Center with classrooms to allow for expansion of health programs
Incorporates natural light into lower levels of building
Renovates and restructures existing classroom spaces to accommodate the transition to SLC’s
Replaces aged and deteriorating roofing originally projected in the CPF for 2010projected in the CPF for 2010
Removes and reclads the EIFS facia surfaces with metal siding
12/8/2008 20
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 11
Site Components
Includes new and relocated parking lots, drives, and sidewalks to accommodate new construction and revised traffic flows
Includes site lighting to complement the new drives and parking lots
Includes off-site utility improvements, i.e., upgrades to the sanitary sewer as required by City of Greenwood
Razes old Maple GroveRazes old Maple Grove
Removes underground fuel tanks from old Transportation building
Includes required landscaping, retaining walls, and green space per code
12/8/2008 21
High School Co-curricular and Extra-Curricular Improvements
$27,295,000
F G H I J K L
HIGH SCHOOL CO-CURRICULAR & EXTRA-CURRICULAR IMPROVEMENTS
Additional Music Space
Natatorium & Weights
New Locker Room Facility & New Turf
at Soccer Field North of C.G. Elementary
New Football Press Box & Grandstands
New Restroom / Concession /
Admission Facility at Baseball Field
New Tennis Courts / Resurfacing
Existing Tennis Courts
High School Co-Curricular & Extra-Curricular
Improvements TOTALS
12/8/2008 22
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 12
HS Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Improvements
Co-curricularCreates additional instructional and practice space for Music program beyond that in “Base” projectConstructs new 50-meter natatorium, and renovates existing pool area for weight room
Extra-curricularAdds basic locker room to softball/soccer complex and turf to soccer fieldConstructs new press box and bleachers at football field to Constructs new press box and bleachers at football field to increase seating capacity to 6,500 spectatorsConstructs admissions/concession/restroom complex at baseball fieldsAdds six (6) tennis courts and repairs existing tennis courts’ sub-base (originally projected in CPF)
12/8/2008 23
Financial Information
DR. PAUL GABRIEL
12/8/2008 24
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 13
Information Required for the 1028 Hearing Elementary School Consolidation Project: Estimated maximum par amount of bonds: $30,850,000 Maximum term of lease: 21 years Maximum annual lease payment: $3,075,000 Maximum total of all lease payments: $54,140,000 Total interest cost: $24,800,000 2007 pay 2008 Debt Service Fund levy and rate: $10,780,123 and rate of $.4109 2008 pay 2009 estimated Debt Service Fund levy and rate: $10,701,626 and rate of $.5096 Estimated maximum annual total Debt Service Fund levy during lease term: $10,701,626 Estimated maximum annual total Debt Service Fund rate during lease term: $.5096 Percent current outstanding and overlapping indebtedness to A.V. (all units): 3.85% Percent current annual Debt Service payments to A.V (school district only): 0.41% Percent estimated maximum annual Debt Service payments to A.V. (school district only): 0.51% Estimated operational costs for first year of new elementary school: $375,000 Estimated operational costs for first year of entire consolidation project: below current level Anticipate pursuing new facility adjustment to obtain additional State revenue High School Base Project: Estimated maximum par amount of bonds: $84,210,000 Maximum term of lease: 21 years Maximum annual lease payment: $8,325,000 Maximum total of all lease payments: $149,585,000 Total interest cost: $67,300,000 2007 pay 2008 Debt Service Fund levy and rate: $10,780,123 and rate of $.4109 2008 pay 2009 estimated Debt Service Fund levy and rate: $10,701,626 and rate of $.5096 Estimated maximum annual total Debt Service Fund levy during lease term: $13,275,076 Estimated maximum annual total Debt Service Fund rate during lease term: $.5519 Percent current outstanding and overlapping indebtedness to A.V. (all units): 3.85% Percent current annual Debt Service payments to A.V (school district only): 0.41% Percent estimated maximum annual Debt Service payments to A.V. (school district only): 0.55% Anticipate pursuing new facility adjustment to obtain additional State revenue Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Project: Estimated maximum par amount of bonds: $27,295,000 Maximum term of lease: 21 years Maximum annual lease payment: $2,545,000 Maximum total of all lease payments: $46,895,000 Total interest cost: $21,000,000 2007 pay 2008 Debt Service Fund levy and rate: $10,780,123 and rate of $.4109 2008 pay 2009 estimated Debt Service Fund levy and rate: $10,701,626 and rate of $.5096 Estimated maximum annual total Debt Service Fund levy during lease term: $10,701,626 Estimated maximum annual total Debt Service Fund rate during lease term: $.5096 Percent current outstanding and overlapping indebtedness to A.V. (all units): 3.85% Percent current annual Debt Service payments to A.V (school district only): 0.41% Percent estimated maximum annual Debt Service payments to A.V. (school district only): 0.51% Anticipate pursuing new facility adjustment to obtain additional State revenue
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 14
The law requires certain information to be presented related to the tax impact. This information is on the attached page
Legally Required Information
attached page.None of this information conflicts with or changes the tax impact which we have previously presented.The law requires us to present each project by itself, as if it were the only one we would do.The elementary project or the Co-curricular/Extra-curricular project, if done individually would not i h increase the tax rate.As we have previously stated, we will be pursuing a new facility appeal to fund the on-going operational costs of all of these projects.
12/8/2008 25
Franklin $2.1283
Comparative Maximum Tax Rate Impact for all Three Projects (Compared to 2008 Rates)
h
Center Grove
Edinburgh
Clark-Pleasant
Franklin
$1 4928
$1.5169
$1.7428
$2.0958
$2.1283
$1.6984(18¢ in 2012)
$0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50
Greenwood
Nineveh
$1.4120
$1.4928
12/8/2008 26
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 15
$350
2012 Estimated Maximum Annual Tax Impact - All Three Projects
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$177
$295$218
$182
$0
$50
$100,000 House
$200,000 House
$300,000 House
$120,000 Farm Land
$100,000 Commercial
$59
12/8/2008 27
$350
Estimated Annual Tax ImpactAll Three Projects - $300,000 House
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$35
$
$295$279
$0
$50
$100
2010 2011 2012 2013
$68
$173
12/8/2008 28
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 16
$350
Estimated Annual Tax ImpactHS 1 & 2 Projects - $300,000 House
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$35
$173
$0
$50
$100
2010 2011 2012 2013
$39$94
$173$162
12/8/2008 29
$350
Estimated Annual Tax ImpactHS Base Project - $300,000 House
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$35
$0
$50
$100
2010 2011 2012 2013
$0 $12$69
$61
12/8/2008 30
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 17
$3 000$2,714
Example Maximum Annual Tax ImpactAll Three Projects - $300,000 House
Total School Taxes
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$1,766$2,061
$0
$500
2008 2009 2009 w/project
12/8/2008 31
Referendum Calendar
DR. PAUL GABRIEL
12/8/2008 32
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 18
Authorize 1028 hearing November 24
Advertise 1028 hearing November 28
Calendar for a Possible ReferendumSpring 2009
Advertise 1028 hearing November 28
1028 hearing December 9
Advertise resolutions December 17
End of petition period 30 days after advertisement
Questions are certified January 9Questions are certified January 9
Election Week of April 13
Begin taking construction bids May 13
12/8/2008 33
Closing Remarks
DR. STEVEN STEPHANOFF
12/8/2008 34
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 19
Shall the Center Grove Community School Corporation, Johnson County, Indiana, issue bonds or enter into a lease
Three Referendum Questions
y, ,to finance the Elementary School Consolidation Project?
Shall the Center Grove Community School Corporation, Johnson County, Indiana, issue bonds or enter into a lease to finance the High School Base Project?
Shall the Center Grove Community School Corporation, Johnson County, Indiana, issue bonds or enter into a lease to finance the Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Project?
12/8/2008 35
Public Comments
PURPOSE
AND
PROCEDURES
12/8/2008 36
1028 Hearing 12-09-08 Page 20
top related