Compressible Flow - Zachary Warner · 7. Record the upstream volumetric flowrate from the rotameter. A proper flowrate value can be found by reading from the center of the circular
Post on 22-Dec-2019
2 Views
Preview:
Transcript
Compressible Flow
Zach Warner
Lab Partners:
Fletcher Ryan & Phillip Hoff
ME 4031W
Basic Measure Lab
Section: 3
University of Minnesota
October 27, 2015
Warner 1
Table of Contents
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………2
Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………..2-3
Method………………………………………………………………………………………......3-6
Equipment List………………………………………………………………………….3-4
Procedure………………………………………………………………………………..4-6
Case 1: Constant Upstream Pressure, Varying Downstream Pressure……….....4-5
Case 2: Constant Downstream Pressure, Varying Upstream Pressure.………....5-6
Case 3: Continuously Choked Orifice……………………………...…………......6
Results & Discussion……………………………………………………………………..……7-11
Nomenclature Table…………………………………………………………………...…..7
Characterization of Flows Through an Orifice………………………………...………8-11
Determination of the Discharge Coefficient……………….………………………….…11
Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………….…12
References………………………………………………………………………………………..12
Appendix……………………………………………………………………………………..13-17
Warner 2
Abstract
In our experiment, flow was studied through a critical orifice. A special apparatus was used (see
Figure 1) to determine the volumetric and mass flow rates versus the pressure ratios. This
allowed for a better understanding of when the orifice becomes choked and how it sets a limit on
the volumetric flowrate. Then a log-log plot of volumetric flowrate and pressure difference was
constructed to determine the power of relationship between these two variables. With a 0.052”
diameter the volumetric flowrate limit was set at 30 ft3/h. Additionally, the discharge coefficient
of this orifice was determined to be 0.87 ± 0.66% at a 95% confidence level.
Introduction
Throughout industry and research critical orifices are used to regulate gas flow rates by setting
an upper limit to the volumetric flow rate. This occurs when the flow becomes sonic and the flow
velocity reaches the speed of sound. Sonic flow can also be defined when the pressure ratio
across the orifice reaches the critical pressure ratio given by equation 1, where k is the ratio of
specific of the gas.
Equation 1: Critical Pressure Ratio
When the flow becomes sonic, the orifice is referred to as choked. A choked orifice has an upper
limit on its volumetric flowrate that is theoretically found using equation 2, where k is the ratio
of specific heats of the gas, R is the specific gas constant, Tup is the temperature upstream of the
orifice, and A* is the cross-sectional area of the orifice.
Equation 2: Volumetric Flowrate Through a Choked Orifice
A good measure of how the experimental flowrate compares to the theoretical flowrate is the
discharge coefficient. This is a dimensionless number that is the ratio of the actual discharge to
the theoretical discharge given by equation 3. Differences from theory is due to separation of
flow from the walls of the orifice.
Equation 3: Discharge Coefficient
This experiment uses three different cases to study the volumetric flowrate through a critical
orifice and to determine the orifice’s discharge coefficient. The first case consists of setting the
Warner 3
upstream pressure to atmospheric while the downstream pressure is varied up to maximum
vacuum. The second case consists of setting the downstream pressure to atmospheric while the
upstream pressure is varied up to 2 atm. The third case consists of setting the downstream
pressure to maximum vacuum while the upstream pressure is varied from 0 to 2 atm. In the first
two cases, the flow will become choked at some given critical pressure ratio, but in the third case
the orifice will always be choked. Once the discharge coefficient is found experimentally, it is
contrasted with other typical coefficients for cylindrical orifices.
Method
Equipment List (refer to Table 1 and Figure 1):
1. Building Supply Air
2. Speedaire Pressure Regulator
3. Air Filter
4. Dwyer Rotameter, 10 SCFH or 50 SCFH
5. Three-way Control Valve for Rotatameters
6. Ashcroft 6” Grade 3A 0-30 psi Test Gauge
7. Cylindrical Orifice
8. Ashcroft 6” Grade 3A 0-30 inches Hg Test Gage
9. Vacuum Pump
10. Several 3/8” Quick Disconnect Couplings
Figure 1: Apparatus
Warner 4
Item Manufacturer Model No. Uncertainty
Pressure Regulator Speedaire 4ZL01 -
Rotameter Dwyer RMB-50 3%
Rotameter Dwyer RMB-52 3%
Three-way Control
Valve
Swagelok B-43XF4 -
6” Grade 3A 0-30 psi
Test Gauge
Ashcroft 1082 0.25% accuracy,
resolution of 0.1 psig
6” Grade 3A 0-30
inches Hg Test Gage
Ashcroft 1082 0.25% accuracy,
resolution of 0.1 Hg
Vacuum Pump - TA-0040-V -
Table 1: Equipment and their corresponding information
Procedure:
Case 1: Constant Upstream Pressure, Varying Downstream Pressure
Figure 2: Case 1 Fluid Power Schematic
1. Record the initial atmospheric pressure and temperature. This is used to find the absolute
pressures from the gage pressures.
2. Use Figure 2 to aid in the construction of the apparatus. Each number represents the
corresponding equipment from the equipment list. Upstream pressure should remain at a constant
atmospheric pressure which is why it is left unconnected to the building air supply. In our case, a
0.052” orifice was used.
3. Ensure that the rotameter measures upstream volumetric flow rate and that the hoses are
configured in a way that upstream pressure is measured directly before the orifice while the
downstream pressure is measured directly after the orifice.
4. Zero both gages.
5. Use the three way control valve to make sure the 10 SCFH rotameter is used initially.
6. Close the valve on the vacuum pump by turning it clockwise.
7. Turn on the vacuum pump.
8. Slowly open the valve until the downstream pressure is 0.1” Hg.
Warner 5
9. Record the flowrate indicated on the rotameter. A proper flowrate value can be found by
reading from the center of the circular indicator.
10. Use the three way control valve to make sure the 10 SCFH rotameter is used initially and
then switch the valve to use the 50 SCFH rotameter when the smaller rotameter becomes
insufficient.
11. Repeat steps 8-10 up to a downstream pressure of 21” Hg. From 0.0-1.0” Hg use increments
of 0.1”, from 1.0-4.0” Hg use increments of 0.2”, and from 4.0-21.0” Hg use increments of 1.0”.
12. Turn off the vacuum pump when finished.
Case 2: Constant Downstream Pressure, Varying Upstream Pressure
Figure 3: Case 2 Fluid Power Schematic
1. Use Figure 3 to aid in the construction of the apparatus. Each number represents the
corresponding equipment from the equipment list. In our case, a 0.052” orifice was used.
2. Ensure that the upstream pressure is measured directly before the orifice and the downstream
pressure is measured directly after the orifice. The downstream pressure should remain at a
constant atmospheric pressure, which is why it remains unconnected in the diagram.
3. Ensure that the rotameter reads upstream volumetric flowrate.
4. Use the three way control valve to make sure the 10 SCFH rotameter is used initially.
5. Turn on the building supply air to the pressure regulator and rotate the regulator knob counter-
clockwise until the upstream pressure is set to zero.
6. Adjust the pressure regulator until the upstream pressure is 0.1 psi.
7. Record the upstream volumetric flowrate from the rotameter. A proper flowrate value can be
found by reading from the center of the circular indicator.
8. Use the three way control valve to make sure the 10 SCFH rotameter is used initially and then
switch the valve to use the 50 SCFH rotameter when the smaller rotameter becomes insufficient.
Warner 6
9. Repeat steps 6-8 for upstream pressures up to 25.0 psi. From 0.0-1.0 psi use increments of 0.1
psi, from 1.0-3.0 psi use increments of 0.2 psi, from 3.0-10.0 psi use increments of 0.5 psi, and
from 10.0-25.0 psi use increments of 1.0 psi.
10. Close the valve on the pressure regulator when finished.
Case 3: Continuously Choked Orifice
Figure 4: Case 3 Fluid Power Schematic
1. Use Figure 4 to aid in the construction of the apparatus. Each number represents the
corresponding equipment from the equipment list. In our experiment, a 0.052” diameter orifice
was used. In this case, nothing should be left unconnected.
2. Ensure that the upstream pressure is measured directly before the orifice and the downstream
pressure is measured directly after the orifice. Additionally, ensure that the rotameter is
measuring upstream volumetric flowrate.
3. Use the three way control valve to make sure the 10 SCFH rotameter is used initially.
4. Close the valve on the vacuum and turn it on.
5. Open the valve on the vacuum pump while simultaneously increasing the upstream pressure to
balance out the upstream pressure to zero.
6. Repeat step 5 until the valve on the vacuum pump is completely open.
7. Record the upstream and downstream pressures in addition to the volumetric flowrate from the
rotameter.
8. Increment the upstream pressure by 1 psi and repeat step 7.
9. Repeat steps 7-8 until you reach 25 psi.
10. When data is done being collected, slowly close the pressure regulator valve and the vacuum
pump valve at the same time. Ensure that the pressures always remain within their respective
ranges, this is extremely important.
Warner 7
Results & Discussion
All of the various variables and subscripts that are used in this report can be found in the
nomenclature table below (Table 2).
Variable Symbol
Pressure P
Absolute Downstream Pressure Pdown
Absolute Upstream Pressure Pup
Absolute Pressure Pabsolute
Gage Pressure Pgage
Atmospheric Pressure Patmospheric
Vacuum Gage Pressure Pvacuum
Ratio of Specific Heats k
Cross-Sectional Area of Orifice A*
Upstream Cross-Sectional Area Aup
Cross-Sectional Area at Orifice Throat Athroat
Diameter of Orifice D
Specific Gas Constant for Air Ra
Specific Gas Constant R
Temperature T
Upstream Temperature Tup
Maximum Upstream Volumetric Flowrate Qup
Maximum Actual Volumetric Flowrate
Through Orifice
Qmax,actual
Maximum Theoretical Volumetric Flowrate
Through Orifice
Qmax,theoretical
Volumetric Flowrate Indicated on Rotameter Qindicated on rotameter
Corrected Volumetric Flowrate Qactual
Discharge Coefficient Cd
Density ρ
Density During Factory Calibration ρduring factory calibration
Density During Experimental Use ρduring actual use
Upstream Density ρup
Density at Orifice Throat ρthroat
Upstream Velocity Vup
Velocity at Orifice Throat Vthroat
Mass Flowrate �̇�
Table 2: Nomenclature Table
Warner 8
Characterization of Flows Through an Orifice
The pressures recorded in this experiment are actually different than their absolute pressures.
They are relative to the local value of the atmospheric pressure and are called gage pressures.
There are two different equations that can be used to calculate the actual absolute pressures. For
pressures that are higher than atmospheric pressure (upstream pressures in this case) use equation
4.
Equation 4
For pressures that are lower than atmospheric pressure (downstream pressures in this case) use
equation 5.
Equation 5
Since this experiment was performed under conditions that are different than the conditions
carried out during the calibration of the rotameters, a correction was carried out to ensure that the
most accurate values of the flowrates are determined. The manufacturers recommend to use
equation 6 to make this adjustment. To find the density values, the ideal gas law (Equation 7) can
be used based on the ambient conditions. The factory calibration was at a pressure of 12.7 psia
and a temperature of 70°F. The atmospheric conditions of this experiment were at a pressure of
14.35 psi and a temperature of 71°F. The variable R in the ideal gas law is the specific gas
constant for the gas. The specific gas constant for air is 0.287 kJ/kg-k.
Equation 6: Dwyer Rotameter Volumetric Flowrate Correction
Equation 7: The Ideal Gas Law
A good way to study how the air flows through the orifice is to look at how the orifice’s
volumetric flowrate is affected by the pressure ratio from downstream to upstream. This allows
you to calculate the critical pressure ratio using equation 1 and make conclusions on when the
orifice becomes choked. The experimental results of how the volumetric flowrate was affected
by the pressure ratio for case 1 and case 2 (from the procedure) are shown in Figure 5.
Warner 9
Figure 5: Displays the relationship between the orifice volumetric flowrate and the
pressure ratio at the orifice.
The dotted line on the graph is placed to show where the critical pressure ratio is. It can be seen
in both cases that the orifice volumetric flowrate remains relatively constant before this critical
ratio. After this ratio the volumetric flowrate decays towards zero as the downstream pressure
gets closer to the upstream pressure. The orifice creates an upper limit on the volumetric flowrate
of around 30 ft3/h.
In additional method of analyzing the flow through an orifice is to determine how the mass
flowrate is affected by the pressure ratio. This allows us to see how the mass flowrate changes
before and after it becomes choked. To calculate the mass flowrate we can use the continuity
equation shown below as equation 8.
Equation 8: Continuity Equation
The density at the rotameter can be calculated by once again using equation 7, evaluating using
the atmospheric temperature, the specific gas constant for air, and the upstream pressures
indicated on the test gauge. The mass flowrate can then simply be calculated by multiplying the
actual volumetric flowrate values by the density at the rotameter. The experimental results of
how the volumetric flowrate was affected by the pressure ratio for case 1 and case 2 (from the
procedure) are shown in Figure 6.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Qac
tual
[ft3
/ho
ur]
Pdown / Pup
Orifice Volumetric Flowrate vs. Pressure Ratio
Case 1
Case 2
Critical Pressure Ratio
Warner 10
Figure 6: Displays the relationship between the orifice mass flowrate and the pressure ratio
at the orifice.
Once again the critical pressure ratio is shown with a dotted line. In case 1, the mass flowrate
behaves much like that of the volumetric flowrate. Below the critical pressure ratio, the mass
flowrate remained constant at about 35 kg/hour, but after it decayed to zero as the downstream
pressure reached the upstream pressure. In case 2, the orifice mass flowrate doesn’t seem to be
affected by the orifice being choked. This is due to the fact that in this case the density of the air
at the orifice doesn’t stay constant.
The logarithmic actual volumetric flowrate was then graphed as a function of logarithmic
pressure difference (Figure 7). Additionally, Figure 7 displays linear fits and 95% confidence
intervals for when both cases show volumetric flowrate increasing as well as when both cases
show constant volumetric flowrate. This graph allows for a better understanding of how these
variables affect each other because on a log-log plot the slope of the best fit line displays the
power of the relationship. It can be seen that when the logarithmic pressure difference becomes
around 0.75 the volumetric flowrate hits a constant limit, indicating when the orifice is choked.
This demonstrates that these variables have no relationship when log ∆P > 0.75 or in other words
when the pressure difference gets too high. Prior to this limit, both cases show a relationship
between these two variables. In case 1, the relationship between actual volumetric flowrate and
pressure difference has a power of 0.4789. In case 2, the relationship between actual volumetric
flowrate and pressure difference has a power of 0.4383. Now that there is a better understanding
of the flow conditions and how the orifice controls the flowrate, the orifice’s discharge
coefficient will be calculated.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Mas
s Fl
ow
rate
[kg
/ho
ur)
Pdown / Pup
Orifice Mass Flowrate vs. Pressure Ratio
Critical Pressure Ratio
Case 1
Case 2
Warner 11
Figure 7: Displays the power of relationship between the change in pressure and the
volumetric flowrate at the orifice.
Determination of the Discharge Coefficient
In this section, the discharge coefficient will be calculated for the orifice used in this experiment.
Using equation 2, the theoretical volumetric flow rate for each of the data points can be
calculated. The orifice area can be calculated using the orifice’s diameter along with equation 9.
𝐴∗ =𝜋
4𝐷2
Equation 9: Area of Circular Cross-Section
For our experiment, Ra = 0.287 kJ/kg-k, D = 0.052” = 0.00132 m, Tup = 71°F = 294.82 K, k = 1.4
(for air). The theoretical volumetric flowrate for this experiment was calculated to be 2.73 x 10-4
m3/s or 34.7 ft3/h. Once this is done equation 3 can be used to calculate a discharge coefficient
for each data point. From these calculations an average was found and error analysis was used to
determine the orifice’s discharge coefficient to a 95% confidence level. The experimental
discharge coefficient for the 0.052” orifice was calculated to be 0.87 ± 0.66%. The error in the
value was concluded to be largely due to the sample mean precision error. A study done by A. J.
Ward-Smith pursued to determine the characteristics of cylindrical orifices. He concluded that
the discharge coefficient fell between the range of 0.81-0.86. This is agrees with the discharge
coefficient that was determined in this experiment. The difference in discharge coefficient was
concluded to be due to variations in the sharpness of the leading edge of the orifice as well as to
the slight error in the measurements of orifice diameter. Errors in orifice diameter can lead to
errors in flowrate calculations.
y = 0.4789x + 1.1377R² = 0.9913
y = 0.4383x + 1.1299R² = 0.9884
y = -6E-14x + 1.4828R² = #N/A
y = 0.0127x + 1.471R² = 0.1678
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
-1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
log
Qac
tual
log ∆P
log Qactual vs. log ∆P
Case 1
Case 2
Case 1 Confidence Interval
Case 2 Confidence Interval
Linear (Case 1 Linear)
Linear (Case 2 Linear)
Warner 12
Conclusion
This experiment analyzed the flowrate through a 0.052” diameter orifice in three different
conditions: upstream pressure set to atmosphere and downstream varied to maximum vacuum,
upstream pressure varied up to 2 atm and downstream set to atmospheric, and upstream pressure
varied up to 2 atm while downstream is held at maximum vacuum. The first two cases allowed
for us to study how the orifice flowrates react to differences in upstream and downstream
pressures. It was determined that this particular orifice set the volumetric flowrate limit to 30
ft3/h when it was choked. It was also concluded that since upstream density varies in the second
case, the mass flowrate wasn’t held to a constant value. The third experimental case was used to
determine the overall discharge coefficient, a good measurement of how the flowrate differs
from the theoretical flowrate when using a particular orifice. The experimental cylindrical orifice
yielded a discharge coefficient of 0.87 ± 0.66%, which agreed with past experimental values. To
add certainty to this experiment it should be attempted to reduce any possible human error in
measuring pressure values. Additionally, further testing should be done with cylindrical orifices
of different diameters and lengths. This would allow for a better understanding of how variations
in orifice dimensions affect the overall orifice discharge coefficient.
References
Dahl, Scott. Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data. Twin Cities: University of Minnesota,
n.d. PDF.
Lab 4: Compressible Flow. Twin Cities: University of Minnesota, n.d. PDF.
McMurry, Peter. Fluid Flow Rate Measurement. Twin Cities: University of Minnesota, 5 Aug.
2015. PDF.
McMurry, Peter. Regression Analysis. Twin Cities: University of Minnesota, 5 Aug. 2015. PDF.
McMurry, Peter. Uncertainty Analysis, Statistical Analysis, and Error Propagation. Twin
Cities: University of Minnesota, 5 Aug. 2015. PDF.
Ward-Smith, A. J. "Critical Flowmetering: The Characteristics of Cylindrical Nozzles with
Sharp Upstream Edges." International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 1.3 (1979): 123-
32. UMN Libraries. Web. 5 Nov. 2015.
Appendix
Lab Notebook Pages
top related