Competition Regulations · & Maths (STEM) project which challenges teams to build a radio controlled four-wheel drive (4x4) vehicle to the specifications provided. The vehicle will
Post on 16-Mar-2020
2 Views
Preview:
Transcript
Competition Regulations2019
Proudly Supported by An initiative of
Version 1.0
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 2 of 60
ENQUIRIESRe-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd.
PO Box 136Castle Hill NSW 1765
P: 61 2 9620 9944F: 61 2 8079 0622
E: contact@rea.org.auW: www.rea.org.au
COPYRIGHT NOTICEThis document, all its contents (including images, text, procedures) are copyright 2019, Re-Engineering Australia Foun-
dation Ltd. All rights reserved.Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd. PO Box 136 Castle Hill NSW 1765 Australia.
Phone: +61 2 9620 9944. Email: contact@rea.org.auREA, Re-Engineering Australia, the Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Logo, and other associated logos are trade-
marks of Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd. All rights reserved
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTIn preparing the Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations certain wording and images have been
adopted from the World Final Competition Regulations.REPRODUCTION
This document may only be reproduced by schools registered in the Land Rover 4x4 in Schools program in Australia regardless of whether they intend to enter teams into the competition. To register your school in the Land Rover 4x4 in Schools program at no cost, click here. Schools outside of Australia must first seek permission from Re-Engineering
Australia Foundation Ltd. prior to reproducing this document.ALTERATIONS
Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd. reserves the right to alter any specifications and documentation associated with the ‘Challenge’ without prior notice.
Proudly Supported by
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 3 of 60
TABLE OF CONTENTSPREFACE – SUMMARY OF MAIN REVISIONS FROM REVIEW OF 2018 SEASON ������������������������������������5
ARTICLE C1 - DEFINITIONS �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������9C1.1 Australian Competition Season ............................................................................................................ 9C1.2 Australian Competition Calendar .......................................................................................................... 9C1.3 Regional Finals ..................................................................................................................................... 9C1.4 State & National Finals ......................................................................................................................... 9C1.5 World Final Competition ....................................................................................................................... 9C1.6 4x4 in Schools National Coordinator / In Country Coordinator ............................................................. 9C1.7 Language Used .................................................................................................................................... 9C1.8 Event Programme ................................................................................................................................. 9C1.9 Judging Schedule ................................................................................................................................. 9C1.10 Terms and Conditions for Entry ............................................................................................................ 9C1.11 Regulations Documents ...................................................................................................................... 10C1.12 Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) .................................................................................................... 10C1.13 Project Elements ................................................................................................................................. 10C1.14 Engineering Drawings ......................................................................................................................... 10C1.15 Penalties ............................................................................................................................................. 10C1.16 Track Assessment............................................................................................................................... 10C1.17 Starter Kit .............................................................................................................................................11C1.18 Vehicle Did Not Start (DNS) .................................................................................................................11C1.19 Competition Classes ............................................................................................................................11
ARTICLE C2 - GENERAL REGULATIONS ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 11C2.1 Representative Team Selection ...........................................................................................................11C2.2 Cost of Participation .................................................................................................................... 12C2.3 Team & Project Entry Conditions ........................................................................................................ 12C2.4 Competition Procedural Regulations .................................................................................................. 14C2.5 Role and responsibility of supervising teacher. ................................................................................... 16C2.6 Team partnerships/collaborations ....................................................................................................... 17C2.7 REA Corporate Partner Logos, Word Marks & National Support ....................................................... 17C2.8 Mandatory Project Elements Submitted at Event Check-in ................................................................ 18C2.9 Project Judging Elements Detailed Information .................................................................................. 18
ARTICLE C3 - COMPETITION AND JUDGING FORMAT ��������������������������������������������������������������������������20C3.1 Event Programme ............................................................................................................................... 20C3.2 Judging Schedule ............................................................................................................................... 20C3.3 Judging Panels ................................................................................................................................... 20C3.4 Who attends Judging? ........................................................................................................................ 20C3.5 Students with Special Needs .............................................................................................................. 20C3.6 Judging categories .............................................................................................................................. 20C3.7 Point allocations .................................................................................................................................. 21C3.8 Judging Score Cards .......................................................................................................................... 21C3.9 National Champions – Professional Class .......................................................................................... 21C3.10 Critical Regulations ............................................................................................................................. 21
ARTICLE C4 - SPECIFICATIONS JUDGING (80 points) ���������������������������������������������������������������������������22C4.1 General Information ............................................................................................................................ 22C4.2 Specification Judging Decision Appeals ............................................................................................. 23
ARTICLE C5 - ENGINEERING JUDGING (330 points) ������������������������������������������������������������������������������24C5.1 General Information ............................................................................................................................ 24C5.2 Key Criteria ......................................................................................................................................... 24
ARTICLE C6 - PORTFOLIO JUDGING (130 points) ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������26C6.1 General Information ............................................................................................................................ 26C6.2 Key Criteria ......................................................................................................................................... 26
ARTICLE C7 - MARKETING JUDGING (125 points) ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������27C7.1 General Information ............................................................................................................................ 27C7.2 Key Criteria ......................................................................................................................................... 27C7.3 Trade Display Arrangements .............................................................................................................. 28
ARTICLE C8 - VERBAL PRESENTATION JUDGING (165 points) ������������������������������������������������������������31C8.1 General Information ............................................................................................................................ 31C8.2 Key Criteria ......................................................................................................................................... 31
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 4 of 60
ARTICLE C9 - TRACK ASSESSMENT & TRAILER TOW (140 points) �����������������������������������������������������32C9.1 Track Assessment (100 points)........................................................................................................... 32C9.2 Trailer Test (40 points) ........................................................................................................................ 34
ARTICLE C10 - VEHICLE SERVICING & REPAIRS �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������35C10.1 General Information ............................................................................................................................ 35C10.2 Penalty Free Servicing & Repairs ....................................................................................................... 35C10.3 Vehicle Servicing/Repair Penalties ..................................................................................................... 36
ARTICLE C11 - GRIEVANCES ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������36C11.1 Procedure ........................................................................................................................................... 36C11.2 Judge’s Decision ................................................................................................................................. 36
ARTICLE C12 - JUDGES �����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������37C12.1 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 37C12.2 Chair of Judges ................................................................................................................................... 37C12.3 The judging teams .............................................................................................................................. 37C12.4 Judging Decisions ............................................................................................................................... 37
ARTICLE C13 - AWARDS ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������38C13.1 Awards Celebration ............................................................................................................................ 38C13.2 Participation recognition ..................................................................................................................... 38C13.3 Prizes and Trophies ............................................................................................................................ 38C13.4 List of awards to be presented ............................................................................................................ 38
ARTICLE C14 - APPENDICES ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������40C14.1 AWARDS MATRIX .............................................................................................................................. 40C14.2 DEVELOPMENT CLASS TRADE DISPLAYS - STATE FINALS......................................................... 41C14.3 SHELL SCHEME TRADE DISPLAY ................................................................................................... 42C14.4 DEVELOPMENT CLASS PORTFOLIO CONTENT PAGE PLAN ....................................................... 43C14.5 PROFESSIONAL CLASS PORTFOLIO CONTENT PAGE PLAN ...................................................... 44C14.6 CRITERIA 1 - SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD (1 OF 2) .................................................................. 45C14.7 CRITERIA 1 - SPECIFICATION SCORE CARD (2 OF 2) .................................................................. 46C14.8 CRITERIA 2 - ENGINEERING - VEHICLE COMPONENTS SCORE CARD ..................................... 47C14.9 CRITERIA 3 - ENGINEERING: DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION & ELECTRONICS SCORE CARD ...... 48C14.10 CRITERIA 4 - ENGINEERING: DESIGN PROCESS SCORE CARD ................................................ 49C14.11 CRITERIA 5 - PORTFOLIO: PROJECT MANAGEMENT & CAREER DEVELOPMENT SCORE CARD ............................................................................................................................................................................ 50C14.12 CRITERIA 6 - PORTFOLIO: PORTFOLIO DESIGN - CLARITY & QUALITY SCORE CARD ............ 51C14.13 CRITERIA 7 - MARKETING: BRANDING SCORE CARD .................................................................. 52C14.14 CRITERIA 8 - MARKETING: TRADE DISPLAY SCORE CARD ......................................................... 53C14.15 CRITERIA 9 – VERBAL PRESENTATION: PRESENTATION TECHNIQUE SCORE CARD ............. 54C14.16 CRITERIA 10 – VERBAL PRESENTATION: CONTENT SCORE CARD ........................................... 55C14.17 CRITERIA 11.1: TRACK ASSESSMENT – SECTION 1 SCORE CARD (SAMPLE ONLY) ............... 56C14.18 CRITERIA 11.3: TRACK ASSESSMENT – SECTION 2 SCORE CARD (SAMPLE ONLY) ............... 57C14.19 CRITERIA 11.3: TRACK ASSESSMENT – SECTION 3 SCORE CARD (SAMPLE ONLY) ............... 58C14.20 CRITERIA 11.4: TRAILER TOW – SECTIONS 1-4 SCORE CARD (SAMPLE ONLY) ....................... 59
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 5 of 60
PREFACE – SUMMARY OF MAIN REVISIONS FROM REVIEW OF 2018 SEASONThis document only contains ‘Competition Regulations’. A separate document encompasses the ‘Technical Regulations’. This preface provides an overview of all competition related regulations that have been revised from the 2018 season’s regulations.It is each team’s responsibility to thoroughly read this document in order to identify wording changes and to understand any impact this MAY have on their project.All changes are identified within the document by using red underlined text.These regulations will be valid for all 2019 State Finals and National Final. Some changes MAY ONLY be valid for National Finals.ARTICLE C1 - DEFINITIONSC1.5 Minor wording updateC1.13 Update to article referencingC1.19 Update to article referencingARTICLE C2 - GENERAL REGULATIONSC2.1.3 Minor wording update.C2.1.4 Update to article referencingC2.2.1 Update to article referencingC2.3.5.5 Minor wording updateC2.4.1.2 No participation by students failing to submit Media Consent Forms before the event.C2.4.1.4 Car Finishing photographic evidence now required within Engineering Compliance Booklet.C2.4.1.5 Grievance Form submission now via onlineC2.4.2.2 Update to article referencingC2.4.8 Recommendation for security of trade displaysC2.5.2 New proviso for eligibility to participateC2.6.3 Minor wording updateC2.8.1.3 New portfolio requirements for submissionC2.8.1.4 Updated requirements for Engineering Compliance BookletC2.8.1.5 New requirements for USB submissionC2.9.4.1 Minor wording updateARTICLE C3 - COMPETITION AND JUDGING FORMATC3.4 Minor wording update to exclude Critical Regulation RectificationC3.6 Minor update to include Marketing criteria in list.C3.7 Points allocation table updatedARTICLE C4 - SPECIFICATIONS JUDGINGC4.1.4.4 Update to article referencingARTICLE C5 - ENGINEERING JUDGINGC5.1.22 Minor wording updateC5.1.3.2 Minor wording updateC5.2.2.1 Inclusion of Orthographic Drawings criteriaC5.2.3.1 Minor wording updateARTICLE C6 - PORTFOLIO JUDGINGC6.1.2 Update to article referencingC6.1.3 Update to appendix referencingC6.1.5 New penalty for failing to submit USB containing portfoliosC6.2.1.1 New requirement for Project Management criteria
ARTICLE C7 - MARKETING JUDGINGC7 Updated points valueC7.1.2 Minor wording and article referencing updateC2.7.1.1 Minor wording updateC7.2.2 Updating Trade Display points valueC7.2.2.2 Updated Trade Display assessment criteriaC7.3 New article conderning Trade Display design considerationsC7.3.2 Minor wording updateC7.3.3.1 Minor wording updateC7.3.3.2 Minor wording updateC7.3.5 Inclusion of two new Trade Display conditionsC7.3.6 Inclusion of two new Trade Display penalties and minor wording updateARTICLE C8 - VERBAL PRESENETATION JUDGING
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 6 of 60
C8.1 Updated points valueC8.1.3 Update from 8 to 10 minute maximum presentation timeC8.1.4 Update to article referencingC8.2.32 Updated points valueARTICLE C9 - TRACK ASSESSMENT & TRAILER TOWC9.1.6.1 Minor wording updateC9.1.6.2 Minor wording updateARTICLE C10 - VEHICLE SERVICING & REPAIRSC10.1.3 Minor wording updateC10.2.2 Minor wording updateC10.3.2 Minor wording updateARTICLE C11 - GRIEVANCESC11.1.1 Updated to reflect an on-line submission processC11.1.2 Minor wording update
ARTICLE C12 - JUDGES Nil changesARTICLE C13 - AWARDSC13.4 New eligibility added for winning Engineering related awardsC13.4.1 Best Team Portfolio updated with new criteria. Chair of Judges Recognition Award replaces
Encouragement Award and new Best Newcomer AwardAPPENDICESAppedix 1 AWARDS MATRIX - Updated to reflect new Development Class criteriaApprendix 3 SHELL SCHEME TRADE DISPLAY - New diagramCriteria 1 - 11.3 SCORECARDS - All updates in red underlined text
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 7 of 60
Welcome� The Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Technology Challenge is an International Science, Technology, Engineering & Maths (STEM) project which challenges teams to build a radio controlled four-wheel drive (4x4) vehicle to the specifications provided. The vehicle will be required to successfully navigate and complete obstacles on an off-road test track that is just as demanding as the real thing, and emulates the capabilities of a full size 4x4 vehicle.In Australia, the Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Technology Challenge Technology Challenge is managed by Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd.This document will identify the challenge along with the learning outcomes, accreditation and benefits of being involved in the project. This document along with the 2019 Season Technical Regulations document aims to inform you of all you need to know about the challenge and answer any questions you may have. If, however, you would like to speak direct to a Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Technology Challenge authorised representative about the challenge you can contact REA.This document has been produced by educational and engineering experts to aid you through the Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Technology Challenge Technology Challenge process, from registration to the national final. Please take the time to read through this document before you get started and hopefully with this guidance you will help form a successful team and a challenge winning vehicle.
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE CHALLENGEThe goal of the project is to raise awareness, interest and enthusiasm in Engineering through the practical application of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). As mentioned the challenge can be undertaken either in or out of school lessons. During school time the challenge can be run in Engineering and Design & Technology or simply as an extracurricular activity.The Engineering industry requires creative multi-disciplined individuals who are capable of problem solving through individual endeavour and working in motivated teams. This project emulates a work situation where specialists come together to resolve a complex problem and share intellectual and practical resources to effect a solution. The challenge is an excellent opportunity for students to work in design teams to gain an awareness and understanding of project management, and other key skills. Teams are also encouraged to link with Engineers from companies who will be able to support teams by acting as industrial advisers, mentors or providing ‘hands on’ support to the project giving it an essential industrial partnership.The objectives of the Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Technology Challenge are to provide a challenge that:
• Is educational but which provides participants with the opportunity to experience an activity that is realistic and relevant to the operations within industry.
• Provides young people with an opportunity to learn and develop through participation in a hands-on practical experience.
• Provides an experience where young people can develop and embed the knowledge and skills later required to meet specifications within the subjects of Design & Technology and Engineering.
• Enables young people to gain an understanding and awareness of what engineering involves and which encourages them to actively think about a career within engineering.
• Is motivating, exciting, challenging and fun for both the young people and adults participating.• Provides young people with the opportunity to work as a member of a team or independently to
develop problem solving tools and techniques.• Integrates subject knowledge from key areas of the curriculum with the wider agenda of work related
learning, enterprise, key skills and personal development.• Enables real life engineers (STEM Mentors) to act as role models and share their engineering
knowledge.
PROJECT RATIONALEThe aim of this challenge is to create a curricular design and make activity, which draws heavily on Engineering, applied science, applied mathematics, CAD/CAM, Electronics, financial management and ICT. The project expects to develop the participant’s skill in the practical application of scientific principles through the design and manufacture of a radio controlled 4WD vehicle. The emphasis is on low speed control. Through the challenge participants will gain an understanding and experience the following:
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 8 of 60
1� Learning Outcome• Analysing a client design brief / business plan• Developing design specification and solution• Producing and reading engineering drawings• Selecting appropriate drawing techniques• Communicating a design solution• Selecting suitable materials, parts and components for a product• Creating a production plan• Using processes, tools and equipment (including CAM), required to make an engineered product.• Checking that the quality of your work conforms to the standards required• Applying health and safety procedures
2� Investigations• ICT in engineering• New components and the range of modern materials• Control technology• Manufacturing techniques• Quality control
3� Team Work• Plan work with others, identifying objectives, and clarifying responsibilities and working arrangements• Working cooperatively with others towards achieving identified objectives, organising tasks to meet
responsibilities• Exchange information on progress and agree ways of improving work with others to help achieve
objectives.
4� Learning Performance• Help set short term targets with team members and plan how these will be met• Take responsibility for some of your learning, using a plan and support from others to help meet targets.• Improve performance by learning through a practical activity• Review progress and provide evidence of achievement
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITYJudges will review teams’ environmental and sustainability impact on their vehicle and project approach. Teams will be judged on the following elements to assess the team that best demonstrates to build an environmentally friendly and sustainable vehicle.
• Vehicle weight • Recyclable materials used on vehicle and throughout the project • Carbon footprint • Elements of the project that can be re-used in future years
TEAM ACCOUNTS, FINANCES & B�O�M�Each team is required to record an account of all the team’s income and expenditure. The accounts must clearly show all sponsorship, in-house made components and the team’s budget. Budget - The budget for each team to spend on components to build their vehicle is a suggested maximum total of $450 excluding the cost of starter kit or equipment. Teams are encouraged to make as much as possible themselves.Finance Sheet - Each team is required to produce a finance sheet which details all of the above information. Please note the finance sheet is different to the Bill of Material (B.O.M).Bill of Material (B.O.M) - Each team is required to produce a B.O.M which clearly details the team’s expenditure itemising each item/component purchased out of the budget. Any parts made in-house can be costed as free and not included in the budget. Any parts received free due to donations, recycling components from previous model or sponsorship should be included in the budget at 33.33% of their RRP price. Any components bought in should be included in the budget at the full cost price.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 9 of 60
ARTICLE C1 - DEFINITIONS
C1�1 Australian Competition SeasonThe standard sequence of Australian 4x4 in Schools competitions runs across one calendar year. The State Finals held Aug/Sep/Oct will feed to the National Final in November of the same year. This encompasses a complete season, for which the regulations SHOULD remain constant. REA Foundation Ltd reserves the right to update / revise the regulations if deemed appropriate.
C1�2 Australian Competition CalendarThis is a calendar of State and National Final events which is available via the Events Calendar tab within the 4x4 in Schools menu on the REA Foundation Ltd. website, www.rea.org.au.
C1�3 Regional FinalsRegional Final events are generally the first level of competition for any team but in these ‘introductory’ years of the 4x4 in Schools competition in Australia, it is unlikely they will be required for some years. However, the decision regarding the need for Regional Finals in all states of Australia is under ongoing review and will depend on the number of Team Registrations received by the advertised deadline. REA Foundation Ltd. will inform teachers of any changes to requirements as soon as possible once final numbers are known.Regional Finals are managed by Regional Hub Coordinators identified by REA and would usually take place over one day.
C1�4 State & National FinalsState and National Final events are managed by Re-Engineering Australia Ltd., are generally held over 2 - 3 days and MAY include various programmed social and competition activities. These events aim to provide all participants with an educational and personal development experience. Specifically, the competitions aim to identify and prepare teams to represent Australia at the World Finals of the Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Tecnhology Challenge.
C1�5 World Final CompetitionThe Australian National Final will feed into a World Final which is usually held anywhere from April through December the following year depending on the country hosting this competition. For teams aspiring to represent Australia at the World Final, please be aware that the World Final Competition Regulations MAY be different to the Australian Competition Regulations. Only the Professional Class of competition is represented at the World Final.
C1�6 4x4 in Schools National Coordinator / In Country CoordinatorA person employed by Re-Engineering Australia Foundation Ltd. (REA) to manage the Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Technology Challenge competition in Australia on behalf of Engineering in Motion (EIM) UK and to identify, manage and co-ordinate teams nominated to represent Australia at the Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Technology Challenge World Final.
C1�7 Language UsedThe language of the regulations is tiered. Those clauses expressed as “MUST” are mandatory and failure to comply will attract objective point and/or racing penalties and in the extreme, disqualification. Those expressed as “SHOULD” or “MAY” reflect some level of discretion and choice.Some clauses will be satisfied through team registration processes or declarations signed as complied with as part of the Challenge Terms and Conditions, whilst others will be tested through a variety of objective and subjective judging.
C1�8 Event ProgrammeThis programme will detail the schedule of all competition activities from Event Registration through to the Awards Presentation.
C1�9 Judging ScheduleA separate Judging Schedule will detail the times and locations of all judging activities for all teams.
C1�10 Terms and Conditions for EntryThere are forms prepared by Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. that teams and teachers are required to complete and submit prior to an event. These forms outline a range of Terms and Conditions that MUST be complied with as part of the initial registration process and participation of all teams in the competition. Failure to submit these forms MAY result in teams being ineligible to compete at an REA Foundation Ltd. managed State or National Final.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 10 of 60
Copies of all forms can be found within the Resources tab within the 4x4 in Schools menu of the REA Foundation Ltd. website. For detailed information refer to ARTICLE C2.4.
C1�11 Regulations DocumentsC1�11�1 Issuing AuthorityREA Foundation Ltd. issues the regulations, their revisions and amendments.
C1�11�2 Competition RegulationsThis document is mainly concerned with regulations and procedures directly related to judging and the competition event. Competition Regulation articles have a ‘C’ prefix. This document SHOULD be read in conjunction with the 4x4 in Schools™ Australian Technical Regulations document.
C1�11�3 Technical RegulationsA document separate to this one which is mainly concerned with those regulations that are directly related to 4x4 in Schools car design and manufacture. Technical Regulation articles have a ‘T’ prefix.
C1�11�4 InterpretationThe final text of these regulations is in English, SHOULD ANY dispute arise over their interpretation, the regulation text, diagrams and ANY related definitions SHOULD be considered together for the purpose of interpretation.
C1�11�5 Text ClarificationANY frequently asked questions that are deemed by REA Foundation Ltd. to be related to text needing clarification will be answered. The question and the clarification will be published on the REA Foundation Ltd. website.
C1�11�6 Supplementary Competition RegulationsOther documents MAY be issued by REA Foundation Ltd. that provide teams with further logistic and other important event information. ANY supplementary regulations will be issued to all teachers and team managers of registered teams, where a valid contact email address has been supplied to REA Foundation Ltd and published on the REA Foundation Ltd. website.
C1�12 Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s)These are portions of text that feature on the score cards within a corresponding points range. The KPI’s describe the type of evidence the Judges will be looking for in order to score the team appropriately.
C1�13 Project ElementsThese are any materials and resources that the team presents as part of its entry for any judging activity and which are submitted at event registration or as advised. See ARTICLE C2.8 & C2.9 for more information.
C1�14 Engineering DrawingsCAD produced drawings which SHOULD be such that, along with relevant CAM programs, could theoretically be used to manufacture the fully assembled car by a third party. Such drawings SHOULD include all relevant dimensions, tolerances and material information.
C1�15 PenaltiesA range of penalties will be applied for non-compliance with identified competition regulations including:
C1�15�1 Point PenaltyInvoked from non-compliance with some competition regulations governing Portfolio or Trade Display restrictions and Vehicle Servicing. These are identified as [Point Penalty].C1�15�2 EligibilityTeams need to meet certain eligibility criteria to compete at a State or National Final. Failure to comply with certain eligibility criteria MAY lead to disqualification from the competition or a class of competition. These are identified as [Eligibility].
C1�16 Track AssessmentThis is a timed track assessment of each vehicle to successfully navigate around a specially made off road track to test the team’s vehicle’s 4x4 ability.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 11 of 60
C1�17 Starter KitThe REA approved Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Technology Challenge starter kit which is available via http://www.envizage.com.au/land-rover-4x4-in-schools-starter-kit/. The Starter Kit contains a remote-controlled ECX® Temper™ Gen 2 rock crawler, a vehicle battery and battery charger.Teams can continue to use the ECX® Temper™ Gen 1 or Vaterra Slickrock vehicle for this current season.
C1�18 Vehicle Did Not Start (DNS)Damaged, unsafe or inoperable vehicles which cannot be made operable or brought into a legal configuration before Track Assessment.
C1�19 Competition ClassesThe challenge is split into two classes for entry into the competition, Development and Professional. Each team MUST decide which class they would like to enter before registering to compete at their first competition event. The two classes will be judged separately to each other and separate awards will be presented. Certain restrictions are applied to the Development Class of competition. For more information see ARTICLE C2.3.
C1�19�1 Development Class – Years 5 – 9 onlyFor first time entering students. Students can only participate in this class once with the exception of Year 5 students who can re-register in this class in Year 6.
C1�19�2 Professional Class - Years 7 – 12 onlyOpen to all students in Years 7 – 12 only. Students may participate in this class multiple times.
ARTICLE C2 - GENERAL REGULATIONS
C2�1 Representative Team SelectionC2�1�1 State FinalsIn all states at the current time and in the early years of establishing this competition in Australia, State Finals will ONLY be held where sufficient demand exists, otherwise teams MAY be required to attend a National Final as their first level of competition. When State Finals are conducted, schools will be required to select their best 2 – 3 teams maximum for participation at a State Final where no Regional Final is in place. The participation of additional teams MUST be negotiated directly with REA Foundation Ltd.Where Regional Finals are conducted, the best Development Class and Professional Class teams will be eligible to move forward to the State Final. Additional teams will be considered on a case by case basis on request to REA Foundation Ltd. by the Regional Hub Manager. ALL Regional Final results MUST be forwarded to REA Foundation Ltd. within 7 days of the completion of the competition event.
C2�1�2 National FinalAt each State Final, the champion Development and Professional Class teams and their supervising teachers (2 maximum) will be invited to represent their state at a National Final. At State Finals where only 1 – 3 teams represent a class of competition, the Chair of Judges will determine if the Class Champions have met the minimum standard required to progress to a National Final. Refer to ARTICLE C13.4 for more information.REA Foundation Ltd. reserves the right to offer ‘Wildcard’ invitations to selected teams. The number and criteria for selection is at the discretion of REA Foundation Ltd. and is not necessarily based on State Final rankings. Teams receiving wildcard invitations will be notified in writing within 7 days of the conclusion of the State Final.
C2�1�3 World FinalThe Professional Class National Champions and their supervising teachers (2 minimum) will be invited to represent Australia at the next World Final which is normally held between April and December, the year following the Australian National Final. The location of the World Final is at the discretion of the organisers and is generally overseas. However, Australia MAY be the host country in the years to come.The overall Professional Class National Champions will represent Australia as a ‘stand-alone’ team of up to six (6) team members.
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 12 of 60
The ICC MAY offer a ‘wildcard’ invitation to a selected National Final Professional Class or Development Class team. The criteria for selection of a wildcard team is at the discretion of REA Foundation Ltd. and is not necessarily based on National Final rankings. Teams receiving wildcard invitations will be notified in writing within 7 days of the conclusion of the National Final. The structure of these teams MAY include internal or international collaboration arrangements.ALL teams accepting selection for World Finals MUST sign an MOU prepared by REA. This is NOT negotiable.A student may only represent Australia at a maximum two World Finals
C2�1�4 Returning World Final TeamsANY World Final representative team wishing to return to the Australian Competition will be provided with automatic entry to the National Final immediately following the World Final so long as least 50% of the team membership remains in place. ARTICLE C2.3.10 does NOT apply. Team Registrations MUST be submitted by the due date and fees still apply.
C2�2 Cost of Participation C2�2�1 State and National FinalsIn addition to ARTICLE C2.3.9 and the Team Registration fees outlined on the REA Foundation Ltd. website, teams and teachers are responsible for all costs associated with participating in the competition. This includes but is not limited to project costs, travel and accommodation and meals. Some meals MAY be provided to teams and teachers at National Finals
C2�2�2 World Final [Advice]In addition to a Participation Fee imposed by the World Final organisers, representative teams and teachers WILL be responsible for all costs associated with their participation including but not limited to funding required for travel, accommodation, meals and project costs. REA will do their best to assist teams in raising the necessary sponsorship but no guarantee can be given.
C2�3 Team & Project Entry ConditionsC2�3�1 Varying the ConditionsREA Foundation Ltd. reserves the right to vary the Team & Project Entry Conditions where special circumstances exist.
C2�3�2 Team MembershipEach team registered in the Australian competition MUST consist of the following minimum and maximum number of students. Mixed gender teams are encouraged.
C2�3�2�1 Development: 3 to 5 team members.C2�3�2�2 Professional: 3 to 5 team members.C2�3�2�3 Collaboration Teams: 4 to 6 team members.
C2�3�3 Collaboration TeamsThese teams will ONLY be formed from State Final teams at the invitation of REA Foundation Ltd. for National Final events. A maximum of 2 schools can participate with balanced representation from each school.
C2�3�4 Supporting or Affiliate Team MembersSupporting or affiliate team members are NOT permitted for ANY class or level of the Australian competition.
C2�3�5 Development Class Entry RequirementsC2�3�5�1 First Time ParticipationA student MAY only compete in the Development Class if they are competing in the competition for the very first time with the exception of Year 5 students who can reregister in this class in Year 6.C2�3�5�2 Year LevelA student MAY only compete in the Development Class if they are enrolled in Years 5 - 9.C2�3�5�3 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Starter KitTeams entering the challenge in this competition class MUST purchase and use the REA approved Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Technology Challenge starter kit.
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 13 of 60
C2�3�5�4 Starter Kit Vehicle CustomisationDevelopment Class team’s MUST adhere to the mandatory modifications. Additionally, there are optional modifications teams can consider incorporating:
1� Mandatory Modifications• Vehicle Body Shell
The vehicle’s body MUST have a shell that covers all the main mechanical elements including the vehicle’s battery, all motors and all four (4) wheels and tyres from plan view (above) but still fit within the overall technical dimensions of the vehicle.
• Vehicle Electronics (light and tilt sensor)Each vehicle MUST have a lateral (centre to left and centre to right) tilt detection system to trigger lights or a buzzer on the vehicle when the angle tilt is greater than 25°, and an automated system to turn the vehicle lights on when the light level drops to 25 lux (below a set level – dark)
• Tow BarAll vehicles MUST be fitted with a tow bar which must be carried by the vehicle throughout the competition.
2� Optional Modifications [10pt Penalty]Teams MAY either purchase, manufacture or modify the suspension and wheels/tyres ONLY. Teams choosing to manufacture vehicle components will be more likely to access higher marks in Engineering judging. Any off the shelf items used MUST be declared in the team’s portfolio, finance sheets and Bill of Material (B.O.M).
3� Receive & Transmitter [10pt Penalty]Teams MUST use the standard receiver and transmitter supplied with the Starter Kit.
C2�3�5�5 Other Class Restrictions
4� PortfoliosDevelopment Class teams MUST restrict their Engineering and Enterprise Portfolios to 7 printed pages. For more information refer to ARTICLE C2.12.2.
5� Trade DisplayDevelopment Class teams MUST comply with certain Trade Display restrictions for State and National Finals. Refer to ARTICLE C7 for content requirements and information on what is provided for each class of competition.
C2�3�6 Professional Class Entry Requirements [Eligibility]C2�3�6�1 Previous ParticipationA team MUST be classified as a Professional Class Team if it has any member who has previously participated in 4x4 in Schools. This excludes Year 6 students who competed in Year 5.C2�3�6�2 LevelA team MUST be classified as a Professional Class Team if it contains any member who is in Year 10 or above.C2�3�6�3 Team Manufactured/Modified ComponentsTeams entering the Professional Class MUST design and manufacture their vehicle to the rules and regulations, manufacturing as a minimum themselves;
• Vehicle ComponentsTeams MAY choose to begin from a starter kit chassis and either purchase, manufacture or modify other elements of the vehicle such as the drive train, suspension, steering and wheels. Teams choosing to manufacture more of their vehicle components will be more likely to access higher marks in the Engineering 1 & Engineering 2 score cards. Any off the shelf items used must be declared in the team’s portfolio, finance sheets and Bill of Material (B.O.M).
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 14 of 60
• Vehicle Body ShellThe vehicles body MUST have a shell that covers all the main mechanical elements including the vehicles battery, all motors and all four (4) wheels and tyres from plan view (above) but still fit within the overall technical dimensions of the vehicle.
• Vehicle Electronics (light and tilt sensor)Each vehicle MUST have a lateral (Centre to left and centre to right) tilt detection system to trigger lights or a buzzer on the vehicle when the angle tilt is greater than 25°, and an automated system to turn the vehicle lights on when the light level drops to 25 lux (below a set level – dark).
• Tow BarAll vehicles must be fitted with a tow bar which MUST be carried by the vehicle throughout the competition
C2�3�7 Multiple Class Entry RestrictionsIndividual students can ONLY compete in one competition class per event.
C2�3�8 Enrolled Full-time StudentsEligibility for participation in the Australian competition requires ALL team members to be enrolled as full-time primary/secondary students studying at school or TAFE or home schools in Australia (at the time of the event) to be eligible to participate in National and World Final competitions. Note: There is no direct pathway for a Development Class team to compete at a World Final.
C2�3�9 Team Registration ConditionsEach student team MUST be registered by their teacher for their first competition event by the prescribed date advertised on the 4x4 in Schools web site. The REA Foundation Ltd. registration process SHALL be followed and the entry fee received by REA Foundation Ltd before the competition date. Entry fees are non-refundable once processed. Fees ONLY apply to State and National Finals.
C2�3�10 Team Membership ChangesEach team MAY ONLY make one change (i.e. add, subtract or substitute) to its membership when progressing to the next level of competition. REA Foundation Ltd will consider up to two team membership changes between a State and National Final when extenuating circumstances exist and upon written request to the Rules Committee.
C2�3�11 Changes to Team ClassificationWhen progressing from State to National Finals, teams MUST remain in the class in which they qualified. This includes the effects of changes to team membership. Teams MAY present a compelling case in writing to REA Foundation Ltd. for transfer to another class which will be considered and adjudicated on by the Rules Committee. Age eligibility criteria applies.
C2�3�12 Entered CarsEntered vehicles MUST be designed and produced during the current Challenge Season and the same vehicle design MUST NOT be entered in more than one Challenge Season. (Teams developing vehicles for a World Final event MUST NOT enter these cars in Australian competitions). A photograph WILL be taken of all submitted vehicles with and without their body shell and kept on file for future reference.
C2�4 Competition Procedural RegulationsC2�4�1 Submitting DocumentationEach team MUST complete and submit ALL the relevant competition documentation as required by REA Foundation Ltd. within the stated timeframes. Some forms are signed electronically when teachers register teams. Others MUST be printed, signed and forwarded to REA prior to the event. All forms are downloadable from the Resources/Competition Documents tab of the 4x4 in Schools menu on the REA Foundation Ltd website. The following documents apply:
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 15 of 60
C2�4�1�1 Terms and Conditions FormThis form constitutes an agreement between REA Foundation Ltd. and supervising teachers regarding participation by teams in State and National finals. The form is electronically signed by teachers when registering their teams on-line via the REA Foundation Ltd website. It is very important that teachers read this form before registering their teams. C2�4�1�2 Media Consent Form (all classes)• One per student.• Valid for the entire Australian Competition Season.
• Parent/Guardian signature required if student under 18 years.• MUST be printed, signed and emailed or faxed to REA one month prior to
event start date. Students failing to submit a signed Media Consent form by Day 1 of the event will NOT be permitted to attend or participate at an REA managed final.
C2�4�1�3 Development Class Declaration FormThis form is electronically signed by teachers when they register their Development Class team on-line. Teachers MUST be aware of and agree to the special conditions for Development Class teams before enabling the check box in the on-line registration form.C2�4�1�4 Vehicle Finishing Declaration Form (all classes)
• One per team.• New form MUST be signed and submitted for EACH event at event check-in.• Team Manager and Teacher signature required.• MUST be accompanied by photographic evidence (within a team’s
Engineering Compliance Booklet) of team members finishing and assembling the car product throughout each step of the post machining process, otherwise penalties apply. See ARTICLE T3.3.2 in the Australian Technical Regulations & C2.9 in the Australian Competition Regulations..
C2�4�1�5 Grievance Form (all classes)• Submission is via an on-line form, a link to which will be provided.• Completed ONLY if teams have a judging grievance.• MUST be submitted by the published deadline.• MUST be completed by the Team Manager ONLY.• The Chair of Judges decision is FINAL.
C2�4�2 Event Check-inC2�4�2�1 Team AttendanceAll teams MUST attend a team Event Check-in process, the timing of which will be published by REA Foundation Ltd. no less than one month prior to the State or National Final. At this check-in, teams will be issued with State or National Final accreditation, event programs and detailed welcome pack.C2�4�2�2 Submitting Project ElementsWhen checking in at State Finals and National Finals, each team MUST provide REA Foundation Ltd with minimum mandatory project elements as outlined in ARTICLE C2.8. Failure to provide the listed items MAY impact on a team’s eligibility to compete and judging outcomes.
C2�4�3 Team UniformsC2�4�3�1 Development & Professional Class TeamsAt State and National Finals, ONLY members of the official competing team are permitted to wear the team’s uniform. No teacher, relative or supporter of a team or team member is permitted to wear a Team Uniform at State or National Finals.
C2�4�4 Collaboration Team AwardsIf a collaboration team wins an award at a National Final which involves a perpetual trophy, this MUST be shared between the team for the 12 months following the event. Award certificates will be duplicated for awards won by collaboration teams.
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Advice]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Advice]
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 16 of 60
Team responsibilitiesC2�4�5 Australian Technical RegulationsTeams MUST read the Australian Technical Regulations carefully to ensure their vehicles comply with those regulations.
C2�4�6 Australian Competition RegulationsTeams MUST read the Australian Competition Regulations (this document) carefully to ensure that all project elements satisfy these regulations and that they understand the requirements and procedures for all aspects of the competition and judging.Attendance at Schedule Activities C2�4�7 Attendance at Scheduled Activities
C2�4�7�1 Team Representation OnlyDuring the competition, ONLY the official team members can represent the team at event check-in, trade display set up, verbal presentation, portfolio, marketing and engineering judging, specifications compliance feedback, critical rule rectification, track assessment, vehicle servicing/repair and ANY direct communication with the Chair of Judges or Event/Competition Director concerning judging matters.C2�4�7�2 All Team Members RequiredDuring the competition, it is the team’s responsibility to ensure that ALL team members are present at the correct time and location for ALL scheduled activities.
C2�4�8 Trade Display SecuritySecurity of a team’s Trade Display and its elements is the team’s responsibility during competition. Teams are strongly advised to remove and secure any marketing or other items when they are away from their booth attending judging or other activities.
C2�5 Role and responsibility of supervising teacher�C2�5�1 Terms and Conditions FormAll supervising teachers MUST carefully read and understand the terms and conditions for entry to the 4x4 in Schools State & National Finals events, and must have explained all relevant information within this agreement to their team/s.
C2�5�2 Other DocumentationAll supervising teachers MUST ensure ALL declaration and media consent forms are completed and sent to REA Foundation Ltd. by the stated deadline at ARTICLE C2.4.1, otherwise teams MAY be ineligible to participate..
C2�5�3 Duty of Care by Schools & TeachersIt is the primary responsibility of ANY event accredited supervising teacher to administer their school’s duty of care / well-being, relevant to their education system’s guidelines, for all their student team members, throughout the entirety of REA Foundation Ltd. managed events. ANY concerns arising during the event in relation to this SHOULD be brought to the attention of the 4x4 in Schools Event Director immediately. A school’s Duty of Care cannot be transferred to a 3rd party such as REA Foundation Ltd.
C2�5�4 Standard of Care by REAREA Foundation Ltd. will do its utmost to administer a high ‘Standard of Care’ for teachers, students and members of the public through adherence with requirements of Workplace Health & Safety, Risk Management and Child Protection procedures. It will always strive to ensure the judging process is applied fairly and equally to each and every team attending our managed events.
C2�5�5 Attending Judging SessionsWhere space permits and at the discretion of the Chair of Judges, ONE approved supervising teacher is permitted to observe (in the background) ANY judging activity with their team but MUST NOT interact in ANY way with the student team, judges or judging process. ANY incident considered inappropriate will be brought to the attention of the Chair of Judges. Teachers are to ensure ALL team members attend every judging session scheduled for their team.
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 17 of 60
C2�6 Team partnerships/collaborationsC2�6�1 Mentoring4x4 in Schools teams are encouraged to develop mentoring partnerships/collaborations with businesses, industry or higher education organisations throughout their project.
C2�6�2 Student Work OnlyALL design work, text and scripting for ALL project elements presented for assessment MUST be wholly undertaken and created by the team members. This includes ALL CAD and CAM data, Portfolio, Trade Display and graphical content. The process of assembling the cars from manufactured components, purchased components and purchased sub-assemblies MUST be wholly undertaken by the team. The process of ‘finishing’ the vehicle MUST be wholly undertaken by the team.
C2�6�3 Documenting Partnerships in PortfolioAspects of ANY partnerships with external individuals or organisations including ANY mentoring and provision of services, MUST be represented in the team’s Portfolio. For project elements produced utilising some outside assistance, teams SHOULD be able to demonstrate to the judges, a high level of understanding of, and justification for ANY of the processes and services used.
C2�6�4 Purchased Project ElementsCommon sense will prevail for project elements or components that a team has purchased from a supplier, e.g. bearings, screw eye, display hardware. Teams SHOULD be able to explain and justify why a specific component was selected / purchased over other similar available components.
C2�7 REA Corporate Partner Logos, Word Marks & National SupportC2�7�1 REA Corporate Partner LogosTeams MUST include the REA Foundation Ltd. Corporate Partner logos in their project and failure to use some or all of the logos as required will be reflected in a team’s marks in the relevant judging criteria. The logos and branding guidelines (where they exist) are available to download from the Resources tab within the 4x4 in Schools menu of the REA Foundation Ltd website and teams MUST be fully aware of the conditions outlined in these documents. The two levels of Corporate Partners are clearly identified within the downloadable file.
C2�7�1�1 Level 1 Corporate Partner LogosThese MUST be applied to a team’s vehicles, portfolio, trade display and uniform. Vehicle decals for Level 1 REA Corporate Partners are supplied to teams immediately prior to the Submission process and MUST be applied to the vehicle. Teams are NOT permitted to produce their own corporate partner decals. Refer to the Australian Technical Regulations.C2�7�1�2 Level 2 Corporate Partner LogosThese MUST be applied to a team’s portfolio and trade display as a minimum.
C2�7�2 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Logo [Eligibility]Teams MUST use the 4x4 in Schools dual logo below. No other version of the logo is permitted.
C2�7�3 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Logo Permitted Use [Advice]Use of the Land Rover 4x4 in Schools logo outside of the STEM Challenge is NOT permitted. Use of the logo within the Challenge MUST follow the Branding Guidelines which are downloaded from the REA website.
C2�7�4 Department of Defence Logo Permitted Us Use of the Department of Defence logos outside of the STEM Challenge is NOT permitted and use of thhis logo within the ‘Challenge’ is NOT permitted on ANY social media pages� Use is restricted to project elements such as cars, portfolios, trade displays and team uniform.
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 18 of 60
C2�7�5 Department of Defence National SupportThe Australian Government’s Department of Defence has provided REA with financial support since 2008. As the largest financial supporter of REA activities, the Department of Defence is already a supporter of your team, so please DO NOT approach them for ANY further financial support.
C2�8 Mandatory Project Elements Submitted at Event Check-inFollowing is a summary of the mandatory elements to be submitted for judging at State and National Finals:
C2�8�1 Development and Professional Class TeamsC2�8�1�1 VehicleOne (1) fully assembled and operating radio controlled Land Rover 4x4 in Schools vehicle with fully charged battery on-board.C2�8�1�2 TransmitterOne (1) transmitter with fully charged battery synchronised with vehicle receiver.C2�8�1�3 Portfolios
• Two (2) identical printed A3 Enterprise Portfolios, bound or in presentation folders.
• Three (3) identical printed A3 Engineering Portfolios bound or in presentation folders.
C2�8�1�4 Engineering Compliance BookletOne (1) bound Engineering Compliance Booklet containing separate A3 size printed engineering compliance drawing/s for specification, Engineering judging and A3 size Photorealistic 3D render/s of the vehicle (Recommended) for Engineering judging AND car finishing and assembly evidence as per C2.4.1.5 presented as hard copy photographs ONLY. Booklet MUST be bound when submitted.C2�8�1�5 USBOne (USB) containing electronic PDF files of a team’s Enterprise and Engineering Portfolios AND Engineering Compliance Booklet.C2�8�1�6 FormsAll required forms as per ARTICLE C2.4.1
C2�9 Project Judging Elements Detailed InformationC2�9�1 Vehicle, Transmitter & Spare Battery
C2�9�1�1 Development and Professional ClassEach Development and Professional Class team must produce a minimum one (1) Land Rover 4x4 in Schools vehicle complete with all corporate decals. The vehicles will be returned to the team at the conclusion of the event.C2�9�1�2 Checking Weight of Vehicle [Advice]Prior to submission, each team will be given the opportunity to check the weight of their vehicle on the official State or National Final scales. If the vehicle being submitted is under legal weight, the team will be permitted to fix any issue in order that it can be submitted at a legal weight.C2�9�1�3 Vehicle Identification [Advice]At Event Check-in, small ‘dot’ stickers (approximately 5mm in diameter) supplied by REA Foundation Ltd, will be adhered to the underside of each car by event staff. These stickers will be colour coded according to the class of competition and numbered for the identification of individual teams. Teams are NOT permitted to remove these stickers for any reasonC2�9�1�4 Parc FermeOnce vehicles have been submitted, they are considered as being in parc fermé and will not be released to teams for judging activities. Officials/judges will transport vehicles to scheduled Engineering Judging, Track Sessions and Servicing activities under strict monitoring conditions.
[Advice]
[Eligibility]
[Advice]
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 19 of 60
C2�9�2 PortfoliosEach Development and Professional Class team MUST submit two (2) A3 sized, well written and presented ‘hard copy’ Enterprise Portfolios and three (3) Engineering Portfolios which should clearly summarise the team’s key activities and key messages for assessment, evaluation, and event promotion. Teams SHOULD produce additional copies for exhibiting within the team’s Trade Booth and for Verbal Presentation if desired.Each Portfolio is limited to 7 PRINTED pages for Development Class teams and 11 PRINTED pages for Professional Class teams which includes the front cover. This can be presented as single or double sided printed sheets. If a Portfolio comprises more than the maximum allowable PRINTED pages, the Judges will only review the first 7/11 printed pages.
C2�9�3 Trade Display Each team WILL be provided with a dedicated exhibition style space for set-up of their Display elements. Refer to ARTICLE C7 for further trade booth specifications, content requirements and information on what is provided for each class of competition.
C2�9�4 Verbal PresentationTeams WILL be required to deliver a verbal presentation in relation to their project to the Judges. The presentation MUST NOT last longer than ten (10) minutes. Teams MUST bring their own laptop with ANY slide show or other multimedia files that need to be shown as part of their verbal presentation. Teams SHOULD also have available their own VGA and HDMI cables to connect to a data projector/TV monitor. ANY team who needs a laptop for verbal presentation judging and is unable to bring one to a State or National Final MUST contact REA Foundation Ltd. (contact@rea.org.au) at least one month prior to the event. Refer to ARTICLE C8 of these regulations for details regarding presentation content and other requirements.
C2�9�5 Laptops for JudgingTeams MUST bring fully charged laptops for identified judging elements as follows. If multiple teams from the same school are participating, more than one laptop SHOULD be brought to deal with situations where teams are being judged in the same time block. ANY team unable to bring a laptop to a State and National Finals event with CAD software installed MUST contact REA Foundation Ltd. (contact@rea.org.au) at least one month prior to the event in an effort to assist in finding a solution.
C2�9�5�1 Engineering JudgingA laptop with the CAD software used by the team and with all CAD part and assembly data MUST be brought to State and National Finals events. This will be needed during the engineering judging session so that the team can demonstrate their CAD work and better explain how they engineered their vehicle design.C2�9�5�2 Verbal PresentationTeams wishing to run a slideshow or video as part of their Verbal Presentation MUST ensure they bring this on a laptop with their own VGA and HDMI cables available for connection to a data projector/TV monitor. Teams SHOULD ensure they are familiar with and adept at managing communication between their laptops and data projectors and TV monitors which will be provided by the organisers.
C2�9�6 Access to the InternetAt Australian State and National Finals, every effort is made but no guarantee given, for teams to have access to the internet at their Trade Display and rooms where other judging is conducted. Teams are strongly advised to organise their own internet access via a portable wireless device.
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 20 of 60
ARTICLE C3 - COMPETITION AND JUDGING FORMAT
C3�1 Event ProgrammeAn Event Programme outlining the timing and venue for all judging and competition activities will be formulated by REA Foundation Ltd. and provided to all teams at event check-in as well as being uploaded to the REA Foundation Ltd website.
C3�2 Judging ScheduleEach team will be judged as per the Judging Schedule. The Judging Schedule will be formulated by REA Foundation Ltd. to best and fairly accommodate all judging and other competition activities.
C3�2�1 Judging Session TimingsTeams will rotate around judging activities as per this judging schedule, with each rotation usually of between 10 – 30 minutes in duration.
C3�2�2 Judging StreamsThe judging schedule MAY be divided into two or two parallel judging streams (Stream A and Stream B), with each judging stream responsible for a class of competition. A number of strategies are implemented within the judging process, including judge briefings and judge reviews, for cross-moderation, to ensure there is consistency across the judging streams, particularly where parallel streams exist within a class.
C3�3 Judging PanelsREA Foundation Ltd. always makes every effort to select judges from industry and higher education institutions who have knowledge and experience relevant to the panel they will be judging on. All judging panels are fully briefed by the Event Director and/or the Chair of Judges prior to the start of the competition.
C3�4 Who attends Judging?ALL team members MUST attend every scheduled judging session as per the Judging Schedule except for Critical Regulation Rectifiction and Car Repair. One supervising teacher MAY observe judging sessions (excluding Critical Regulation Rectification) as per the conditions set out in ARTICLE C2.5.5. This teacher MUST NOT or directly approach or discuss ANY judging matters with the judges at ANY time unless invited to do so.
C3�5 Students with Special NeedsIn circumstances where a student has special needs and upon written application to REA Foundation Ltd. by the supervising teacher at least one month prior to a State or National Final, every effort will be made to accommodate the needs of the student.
C3�6 Judging categoriesThere are six (6) main judging categories, each with its own team of judges – where possible - and specified judging activities as detailed in further articles.
• Specifications• Engineering• Portfolio• Marketing• Verbal Presentation• Track Assessment & Trailer Tow
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Eligibility]
[Eligibility]
[Advice]
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 21 of 60
C3�7 Point allocationsAt State and National Finals, points will be awarded to teams across six (6) categories with maximum possible scores as detailed in the following table. Cadet Class is NOT relevant to the National Final.
State & National Final Points Allocation TableSpecification Dev� Class Pro� Class
Specifications 100 points 100 pointsEngineering Dev� Class Pro� Class
Vehicle Component Engineering 40 points 65 pointsDesign, Construction & Electronics 180 points 180 pointsDesign Process 100 points 100 points
Portfolio Dev� Class Pro� ClassProject Management 80 points 80 pointsDesign 50 points 50 points
Marketing Dev� Class Pro� ClassBranding 60 points 60 pointsTrade Display 50 points 65 points
Verbal Presentation Dev� Class Pro� ClassTechnique 70 points 70 pointsContent 95 points 95 points
Track Assessment Dev� Class Pro� ClassTrack Assessment 100 points 100 pointsTrailer Tow 40 points 40 points
Total 965 points 1005 points
C3�8 Judging Score CardsThe REA Foundation Ltd State and National Finals judging score cards provide detailed information in relation to what the Judges will be looking for. They include key performance indicators which are referred to by the judges in awarding points during judging activities. These can be found in the Appendices at the end of this document. Reading the score cards carefully is important as they provide critical information for teams as to what needs to be presented for each judging category�
C3�9 National Champions – Professional ClassThe Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian National Champions perpetual trophy will be awarded to the Professional Class team with the highest total score - sum of all judging categories (ARTICLE C3.7). In the case of a tied points score, the team with the highest Track Assessment score will be determined the winner. The Chair of Judge’s decision is final.
C3�10 Critical RegulationsC3�10�1 Non ComplianceThere are Technical Regulations that have been identified as being critical regulations. If following specifications compliance AND time given to rectify any infringement (Refer ARTICLE C4�1�4�3), a team’s vehicle is judged as being NON-COMPLIANT with any critical technical regulation, they will incur the following penalties:
C3�10�1�1 Technical Regulation Points PenaltyA points penalty for each violated Technical Regulation as per the Specifications Score Card.C3�10�1�2 Track Assessment & Trailer Tow Points PenaltyA reduction of points for all Track activities equivalent to 10% of points achieved for each violation up to a maximum reduction of 50%.
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
[Advice]
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 22 of 60
C3�10�1�3 Award IneligibilityTeams will unrectified critical regulation violations, will be ineligible for the following awards:
• Best Engineered Vehicle• Best Track Performance
C3�10�2 The critical Technical Regulation articles are:C2.5.5.4 / T3.1 / T3.2 / T3.3 / T4.1.1 / T4.1.2 / T4.1.3 / T4.2.1 / T4.2.2 / T4.3.1 1T4.3.1.2 / T4.3.2 / T4.3.3 / T5.1 / T6.1.1 / T6.1.2 / T6.1.3 / T6.1.4 / T9.1 / T9.2
Note well: Article numbers are from the 2019 Australian Technical Regulations (with the exception of C2.5.5.4). Please take extra time to check your cars don’t break ANY of the above critical Technical Regulations.
ARTICLE C4 - SPECIFICATIONS JUDGING (80 points)
C4�1 General InformationC4�1�1 Competition Class ProvisionsSpecifications judging is conducted for ALL competition classes.
C4�1�2 What will be Assessed?Specification judging is a detailed inspection process where the vehicle is assessed for compliance with the Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Technical Regulations. Refer to the specification judging score card for scoring details.
C4�1�3 Team PreparationTeams must ensure that their vehicle is complete and ready for specification judging before they are submitted. Notice is also drawn to the critical technical regulations, refer ARTICLE C3.10. You may be asked to declare your radio control frequency and channel if you are not using a 2.4GHz transmitter/receiver.
C4�1�4 Judging Process / ProcedureTeams begin specifications judging with a full allocation of 100 points. Any infringements of the Technical Regulation articles on the vehicle, will result in point’s being deducted as detailed in the Technical Regulations.This is conducted within the confines of parc fermé, where the Scrutineers will check both cars for compliance to the Technical Regulations. A series of specially manufactured gauges will be used to broadly check compliance. Accurate measuring tools, such as Vernier callipers will then be used to closely inspect ANY dimensions found to be near to dimensional limits per the initial gauge inspection. Specifications compliance checking MAY commence as vehicles are submitted at event check-in.There are two parts to the specification judging process.
C4�1�4�1 Stage 1 (Inspection upon vehicle submission)This takes place immediately after vehicle submission.Teams are required to attend Stage 1.The following features WILL be checked in a driven pre-track stage and during the track and trailer tow performance:
• T4.0 Drive, Wheels and Steering • T7.0 Vehicle Electronics • T8.0 Vehicle control equipment
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 23 of 60
C4�1�4�2 Stage 2 (Inspection after vehicle submission)This takes place behind closed doors in Parc Ferme before the scheduled critical regulation rectification session.Teams are NOT permitted to attend Stage 2. However, teams MAY be required for a clarification session with the judges.The following features WILL be checked
• T3.0 Vehicle Dimensions• T5.0 Vehicle Weight• T6.0 Vehicle Body Shell• T9.0 Tow Bar
C4�1�4�3 Rectifying Critical Regulation FailureTeams that have been judged during initial specifications compliance to have incurred a critical regulation failure through non-compliance with a Technical Rule WILL be provided with a special 60-minute vehicle service time, prior to the commencement of the first track assessment session. If during this service time the vehicle can be modified so as to comply with the failed regulation/s, the vehicle WILL NOT be classified as having incurred a critical regulation infringement. However, the full points’ penalty WILL still apply.C4�1�4�4 Specifications Compliance FeedbackWhere time permits, each team MAY be scheduled a period of time for a review of any specification infringements ruled. This will generally be conducted at a team’s Trade Display. The Lead Scrutineer will highlight to the team any technical regulation infringements and provide necessary explanations. The team is then given an opportunity to explain to the Judges why they feel any identified infringements should be considered as permissible.Following the team’s explanation, the Lead Scrutineer MAY choose to reverse the original decision or uphold it. No further discussion will then be permitted at that point. Teams MAY lodge a Grievance as per ARTICLES C2�4�1�5 and C11�
C4�2 Specification Judging Decision AppealsTeams SHOULD ONLY appeal the specification judges’ decision if they believe their justification for regulation compliance should be accepted. The procedure for submitting technical regulation infringements is outlined in ARTICLE C11.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 24 of 60
ARTICLE C5 - ENGINEERING JUDGING (330 points)
C5�1 General InformationThe Engineering judges will assess the team’s use of technologies along with the quality of manufacture of the team Vehicle in a wide-ranging assessment. Please read the Engineering judging score cards in the Appendices area of this document for detailed point scoring and key performance indicator information.
C5�1�1 Competition Class Provisions• Vehicle Component Engineering – the full range of judging criteria is conducted for Professional
Class teams. Chassis, Steering and Powertrain criteria is omitted for the Development Class.• Design, Construction & Electronics - the full range of judging criteria is conducted for both the
Professional and Development Class teams• Design Process – the full range of criteria is conducted for both the Professional and
Development Classes.
C5�1�2 Team PreparationC5�1�2�1 Vehicle Component Engineering & Design, Construction & ElectronicsTeams SHOULD choose to take a laptop with them to Engineering Judging complete with software, data files and any other supporting project information so they can demonstrate their work and better explain how they engineered their vehicle design.The Engineering judges will not have access to the team pit display for judging purposes. Preparation SHOULD include careful reading of the score card which describes what the judges will be looking for. C5�1�2�2 Engineering Design Process JudgingDevelopment and Professional Class teams SHOULD thoroughly document their Design Process in the Engineering Portfolio.
C5�1�3 Judging Process / ProcedureC5�1�3�1 Vehicle Component Engineering & Design, Construction & ElectronicsThese criteria will be assessed via scheduled interview sessions between a panel of judges and teams. This is an informal interview where judges will ask the team to explain and query teams on what they have done, including any use of CAD/CAM, quality of vehicle manufacture and vehicle assembly. This will be supported by secondary evidence contained within a team’s Engineering Portfolio and any Engineering Drawings the team has submitted as part of their Engineering Compliance Booklet at Event Check-in.Each team is free to produce and show the judges any prototypes and equipment they feel the judges would need to see.The judges MAY request proof or evidence of how a component or element of the vehicle has been manufactured.C5�1�3�2 Engineering Design ProcessEngineering Design Process will be judged from the information documented in a teams’ Engineering Portfolio. Teams will be awarded points as per the key performance indicators shown on the Engineering Design Process score card/s. Each team is required to produce a B�O�M which clearly details the team’s expenditure itemising each item/component purchased out of the $450 budget.
C5�2 Key CriteriaC5�2�1 Vehicle Component Engineering (401/65 points)Refer to the Vehicle Component Engineering judging score card for key performance indicator information.
1 Reduced points apply to Development Class teams only
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 25 of 60
C5�2�1�1 What will be Assessed?The engineering judges will assess a team’s decision to purchase off the shelf components as opposed to designing and manufacture their own. This will include aspects of innovation, technical merit and depth of understanding of vehicle systems functionality. Specific areas to be assessed are:
• Body Shell• Wheels & Tyres• Tow Bar• Chassis2
• Suspension• Steering¹• Powertrain¹
C5�2�2 Design, Construction & Electronics (165 points)Refer to the Design, Construction and Electronics judging score card for key performance indicator information.
C5�2�2�1 What will be Assessed? The engineering judges will assess the team’s use of technologies when manufacturing their car body, other components and electronics. Consideration will be given to the technical merit of decisions made regarding manufacturing process, materials used and sustainability, functionality and aesthetics of the vehicle. Specific areas to be assessed are:
• Vehicle aesthetics• Vehicle functionality• Materials used• Orthographic Drawing/s• Manufacturing processes• Quality of finish• Sustainability• Electronics design• Electronics manufacture• Coding
C5�2�3 Design Process (100 points)Refer to the Engineering Design Process judging score card/s for key performance indicator information.
C5�2�3�1 What will be Assessed? The engineering judges will assess the team’s Design Process as documented in a team’s Engineering Portfolio which includes all stages from identifying the requirements of the brief through to the final design. Specific areas to be assessed are:
• Research• Wheels & Tyres• Specification Design• Concept Selection• Development & Manufacture• Vehicle Testing & Improvement• Overall Technical Merit
2 Not applicable to the Development Class
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 26 of 60
ARTICLE C6 - PORTFOLIO JUDGING (130 points)
C6�1 General InformationC6�1�1 Competition Class ProvisionsApplies to both the Development and Professional Class teams.
C6�1�2 Team preparationEach team MUST prepare an Enterprise and Engineering Portfolio as per ARTICLE 2.12.2. A team’s Portfolios tell the story of the team’s journey including the knowledge and skills they have acquired along the way. It is considered a professional business document so attention to detail is paramount. Most importantly, teams need to read the Portfolio judging score cards carefully to ensure that all areas to be assessed are included within the context of their Portfolios.
C6�1�3 Portfolio StructureTo streamline the judging of team Portfolios, teams MUST structure this as TWO separate documents containing content as follows.
C6�1�3�1 Enterprise Portfolio• Project Management• Marketing, Skill Development & Linking Skills with Careers
C6�1�3�2 Engineering Portfolio• Engineering Design Process
Each Portfolio MUST be clearly labelled as either Enterprise or Engineering with the team name and each contain a maximum:
• 7 pages including the front cover for Development Class Teams• 11 pages including the front cover for Professional Class Teams
Portfolio Design elements will be assessed throughout the teams’ entire two Portfolios. For more information on the suggested page content of the Portfolios, refer to APPENDIX 2 and 3.
C6�1�4 Judging process / procedureThe Portfolios will be assessed initially behind closed doors and conducted before the commencement of scheduled judging sessions. For some key criterion, this will be supported by a verification interview of team members at the Trade Display or other area identified in pre-competition event documentation. Teams SHOULD have a copy of their Portfolios on their Trade Display at all times. Teams are required to submit several copies of their Portfolios for pre-assessment at Event Check-in. Failure to submit the required number and correct Portfolio size will result in penalties being applied.
C6�1�5 Portfolio PenaltiesThe Chair of Judges reserves the right to apply penalties for teams who:• DO NOT submit the correct number of copies required for judging [10pt Penalty]• DO NOT provide copies in the mandated A3 size [10pt Penalty]• DO NOT structure their Portfolio as per C6.1.3 [10pt Penalty]• DO NOT submit electronic copies as per C2.9.1.5 [10pt Penalty]
C6�2 Key CriteriaC6�2�1 Project Management & Linking Skills with Careers (80 points)Refer to the Portfolio score card for detailed point scoring and key performance indicator information. There will be NO verification interview required for this key criteria.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 27 of 60
C6�2�1�1 What will be Assessed? Project Management MUST be contained within each team’s 7 page (Development Class) or 11 page (Professional Class) Enterprise Portfolio in order to assess the following specific areas.
• Team Roles & Tasks • Scope & Time Management• Resource & Risk Management• Internal Communication• Stakeholder Engagement• Skill Development for Future Careers• Evaluation
C6�2�2 Portfolio Design (50 points)Refer to the Portfolio score card for detailed point scoring and key performance indicator information. There will be NO verification interview required for this key criterion.
C6�2�2�1 What will be Assessed? Judges will review each team’s two 7 page (Development Class) or 11 page (Professional Class) Enterprise and Engineering Portfolios in order to assess the following specific areas.
• Production Quality of Materials• Production Quality of Content • Content Organisation• Layout Design• Typography• Photos & Images• Creative Graphics (Visual effects and infographics)• Editing/Proofreading• Referencing/Plagiarism• Writing & Readability
ARTICLE C7 - MARKETING JUDGING (125 points)C7�1 General Information
C7�1�1 Competition Class ProvisionsApplies to both the Development and Professional Class teams.
C7�1�2 Team PreparationEach team MUST prepare an Enterprise Portfolio as per ARTICLE 2.10.2 and a Trade Display as per ARTICLE 2.10.5. Some Branding elements MUST be contained within each team’s 7 page (Development Class) or 11 page (Professional Class) Enterprise Portfolio. Others will be assessed within a team’s Trade Booth. Read the Marketing Score Cards carefully to ensure that all areas to be assessed are included within the context of their Portfolio and Trade Display.
C7�1�3 Judging Process / ProcedureThe Branding and Trade Display criteria from the Marketing Score Card will be assessed primarily within the Trade Display with secondary evidence on logo development assessed from within a team’s Enterprise Portfolio. The Judges will introduce themselves then ask questions to help them find certain content and/or seek further explanation. Teams SHOULD have a copy of their Enterprise Portfolio on their Trade Display at all times. Teams MAY be asked to step away from the Trade Display so judges can gain first impressions and concur before asking them to return to their Display.
C7�2 Key CriteriaC7�2�1 Branding (60 points)Refer to the Marketing score card for detailed point scoring and key performance indicator information.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 28 of 60
C7�2�1�1 What will be assessed? The Marketing judges will assess a team’s branding primarily within their Trade Display� As a secondary source of evidence, the judges will also access a team’s Portfolio to assess the development of a team’s name, logo and branding. Specific areas to be assessed are:
• Team Name• Logo Development• Final Logo Design• Logo Application• Team Branding• Media Exposure• Team Sponsors & REA Corporater Partner ROI• Team Uniform• Team Presence• Team Knowledge
C7�2�2 Trade Display (503/65 points)Refer to the Marketing score card for detailed point scoring and key performance indicator information.
C7�2�2�1 Competition Class RestrictionsIn addition to the general regulations governing Trade Displays, Development Class teams MUST also comply with class restrictions as defined in Appendix 1.C7�2�2�2 What will be Assessed?A Trade Display is to visually ‘sell’ the team’s most important key messages in snapshot form for assessment and event promotion. The Marketing judges will assess a team’s trade display content and structure. Specific areas to be assessed are:
• Vehicle Representation• Prototype Models• Information Design• Use of ICTs• Visual Design & Impact• Structural Design4
• Materials Selection & Use
C7�3 Trade Display ArrangementsC7�3�1 Recommended Design Considerations
1� Costs: Determine a budget and stick to it. Seek sponsorship of cash or donations of booth elements.
2� Research: Innovative ideas and current trends online and/or seek a mentor in this space.
3� Criteria: Read carefully the Trade Display scorecard and conditions (C7.7) within this document.
4� Design: Use 3D CAD to create a digital mock-up.
5� Consider:• Dimensions; Recommended maximum internal build dimensions of provided
booths/backboards• Portability; Think flat-pack, modular, lightweight, pop-up, for ease of set-up
and transportation• Materials; Consider fabric/textile options which are easier to transport, less
prone to damage and more environmentally friendly as opposed to corflute/
3 Points for Development Class at State Finals4 This criteria not applicalbe to Development Class at State Finals
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 29 of 60
vinyl equivalents.• Sustainability; Reuse and recycle, particularly frameworks that can be
reconfigured with new stretch or re-attachable banner materials.• Lighting; Incorporate lighting to accentuate design features and brighten key
areas of your exhibit such as product displays and promotional materials.• Storage; Design options for storage of top-up Marketing material. Use
shelves to attractively organise products.
6� Develop: An optional document that charts your team’s creative approach, design con-siderations (space, purpose), transport limitations (cost and, assembly constraints) and environmental impact to inform judges and justify your decisions.
C7�3�2 Jetta Express SponsorshipJetta Express – an Australian excess baggage company – generously offer National and World Final teams FREE shipping of Trade Display assets from a team’s home state capital city to the event venue and return. Teams wishing to take advantage of this offer MUST adhere to strict guidelines including maximum weights and dimensions. When designing Trade Displays, teams SHOULD give thoughtful consideration to the construction material used which will impact portability and transportation costs. A copy of these guidelines can be downloaded from the Resources/Competition Documents Tab of the 4x4 in Schools menu of the REA website.
C7�3�3 Trade Display Shell Scheme InformationAll team display systems will include 1 x 240-volt power supply but teams will need to provide their own power boards, if required, which MUST have a valid electrical safety test tag. At National Finals ONLY, Trade Displays will also contain integrated lighting and fascia’s.
C7�3�3�1 Professional ClassAt State and National Finals, REA Foundation Ltd. will provide each Professional Class team with a self-contained shell scheme exhibition style display space. Dimensions vary depending on the type of shell scheme provided and the quality of build supplied. In addition, the dimensions can vary between end displays sharing one side wall and internal displays sharing two side walls. See APPENDIX 3.
• Nominal External DimensionsWalling: Nominally 2000mm long x 1000mm wide x 2400m high.
• Maximum Internal Display Dimensions1940mm long x 960mm wide x 2360mm high.
C7�3�3�2 Development ClassAt State Finals, Development Class teams will be provided with back boards ONLY, along with a trestle style table. Use of the trestle table by Development Class teams is compulsory and teams are required to provide their own tablecloth.At National Finals, Development Class teams will be provided with a full, self-contained shell scheme exhibition style display space but NO trestle table.
• Nominal External DimensionsNominally 2000mm long x 2400mm high.
• Maximum Internal Display DimensionsBackboards: 1800mm long x 750mm wide x 2400mm high.Trestle Tables: Approximately 1800mm long x 730mm high x 750mm wide
C7�3�4 Set upA time period will be scheduled for teams to set-up their Trade Displays, usually after event check-in and prior to the commencement of judging. Setup will be conducted simultaneously by all teams. A time limit of 2hrs maximum will be enforced to avoid penalties.
C7�3�5 ConditionsTeams MUST comply with the following conditions:• Development Class Teams MUST adhere to restrictions regarding Trade Displays for State
Finals. See APPENDIX 2.• Trade Displays SHOULD be fully fitted out for judging at the end of the 2hr setup whereupon
photos will be taken.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 30 of 60
• NO other items can be added to the display (excluding top-up marketing items) from this point forward and penalties will be applied for teams breaching this rule.
• REA Foundation Ltd. will instruct teams to remove or alter ANY display inclusions considered to be a safety hazard or inappropriate, including rubbish, bags etc. which are NOT part of the display.
• NO part of the team’s completed trade display is allowed to protrude beyond the physical dimensions of their allocated space. This includes anything that might protrude above the display space highest point e.g. flags, banner, balloons. Teams will be required to remove items infringing this rule and penalties will apply.
• Teachers or adults are NOT permitted to assist teams with the set-up of Trade Displays. All displays MUST be designed so that adult assistance is NOT required for setting up. This includes power, lighting and height issues. Step or full size ladders will NOT be provided, therefore teams need to factor this in to their set-up requirements if they cannot supply their own. All adults (excluding officials and judges) will be required to remain out of the venue where Trade Displays are located until the setup is complete.
• Teams MAY provide their own display internal walls and tables/cabinets so long as they strictly fit within the display system provided. NO part of a team’s substitute internal walling system can encroach beyond or above the walls of the display system provided by the competition organisers and systems MUST be designed so that NO part of the provided display system (including the fascia framework) requires dismantling.
• Teams MUST NOT play sounds or music at their Trade Display at a loud volume. ANY sound or music played MUST be strictly relevant to the project such as commentary on a video produced by the team and NOT just for ‘entertainment’ value.
• Chairs are NOT permitted in or near the displays unless it is a chair/stool specially designed for the display, and this MUST sit within the volume of the display’s external dimensions.
• Display space will be pre-allocated to teams by the event organisers. Teams MUST use the space allocated and displays cannot be repositioned by ANY team unless there is an obstruction to the display or an issue of WHS and this MUST first be approved by the Competition Director or Chair of Judges.
• At National Finals teams MUST design their displays to fit within the supplied booth without requiring the removal of the booth fascia. Removal of the fascia will incur a penalty. See ARTICLE C7.1.7.
• From arrival at the competition venue until the official Trade Display Assembly Period, teams are NOT permitted to pre-construct nor assemble ANY part of their Trade Display anywhere within the premises of the competition venue including ANY venue car park.
• Displays MUST be manned by at least one team member at all times excluding judging sessions. When a team is undertaking a judging session, the teacher or a supporting adult SHOULD supervise the display to ensure security. Note that competitions are generally open to the public.
• Trestle tables are NOT to be sat upon as they are NOT built for this. ANY damage to display systems or provided trestle tables MUST be paid for by the team or their school.
• Workplace health and safety measures MUST be considered when teams are working at heights on their Trade Display.
• ANY electrical appliance (including power boards and extension cords) connected to the power supply MUST have a valid electrical safety test tag.
C7�3�6 Trade Display PenaltiesThe Chair of Judges reserves the right to apply penalties for teams who: • DO NOT comply with Development Class restrictions at State Finals [10pt Penalty]• DO NOT complete their set-up within the 2hr time limit [10pt Penalty]• DO NOT leave their stand in a safe state [10pt Penalty]• DO NOT clear their pit and surrounding area of all rubbish [10pt Penalty]• DO NOT contain their display within the display volume [10pt Penalty]• DO NOT comply with added content restrictions [10pt Penalty]• DO NOT design their display to enable fit-out without removal of fascia [10pt Penalty]• Construct ANY part of their display at the venue prior to scheduled build [10pt Penalty]
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 31 of 60
ARTICLE C8 - VERBAL PRESENTATION JUDGING (165 points)
C8�1 General InformationC8�1�1 Competition Class ProvisionsApplies to both the Development and Professional Class teams.
C8�1�2 Who Needs to Attend?All team members MUST be present at and contribute to the Verbal Presentation.
C8�1�3 Judging Process / ProcedureVerbal presentation judging is scheduled for the same duration as other judging sessions, usually 20 – 30 minutes. Teams will be given 5 minutes at the start of their time to set-up and test their laptop and ANY other presentation technologies and resources. The team will inform the judges when they are ready to begin. The judges start timing the 10-minute duration and will provide a discreet time warning signal when one minute of presentation time remains. The team will be asked to cease presenting when the time limit has been reached. At the conclusion of the team’s presentation time, the judges MAY choose to provide some feedback and / or ask ANY clarifying questions they feel necessary. However, assessment can ONLY be based on the team’s 10-minute presentation. Verbal presentations MAY be filmed for judge’s review or promotional and future resource purposes.
C8�1�4 Team PreparationEach team is required to prepare a verbal presentation as per the requirements at ARTICLE C2.10.6. ANY multimedia content, slides etc. MUST be saved on and shown using the team’s own laptop along with VGA and HDMI cables. Teams need to have all presentation resources tested and ready for verbal presentation judging. Most importantly, teams SHOULD read the verbal presentation judging score card carefully to ensure their presentation features all elements and content that the verbal presentation judges will be looking for.
C8�1�5 Verbal Presentation Judging Provisions�REA Foundation Ltd. will provide a dedicated private space, such as a small meeting room, where each team will deliver their presentation to the judges. This space will include a data projector and screen or large TV monitor. Multimedia sound systems MAY NOT always be available and teams MAY have to bring their own portable speakers. If available these will be in fixed positions but usually with sufficient cable length to allow teams some freedom for choosing where they wish to locate their laptop. A single table will also be made available with its use and location in the presentation space being optional.
C8�1�6 Verbal Presentation Video RecordingsThe verbal presentations of all teams MAY be video recorded by the REA Foundation Ltd. for the purpose of judging review and / or post event publicity and promotional purposes for 4x4 in Schools.
C8�2 Key CriteriaC8�2�1 Technique (70 points)Refer to the Verbal Presentation score card for detailed point scoring and key performance indicator information.
C8�2�1�1 What will be assessed? • Presentation Energy• Team Contribution• Visual Aids• Audience Engagement• Articulation• Structure• Use of Time
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 32 of 60
C8�2�2 Content (100 points)Refer to the Verbal Presentation score card for detailed point scoring and key performance indicator information.
C8�2�2�1 What will be assessed?• Team Objectives• Description of Vehicle Product• Innovation/Refinement• Collaboration• Sustainability• Learning Experiences• Future Career Aspirations and Research• Overall Clarity
ARTICLE C9 - TRACK ASSESSMENT & TRAILER TOW (140 points)
C9�1 Track Assessment (100 points)Each vehicle will be expected to successfully navigate around specially made off road tracks just as demanding as the real thing to test your vehicle’s 4x4 ability. Teams should design their vehicle with considerations to the track challenges and terrain, and are encouraged to include adjustment and tuning capabilities on their vehicle. Teams are permitted to adjust and/or tune components of the vehicle to adapt it to each challenge during Vehicle Servicing sessions. Vehicles may be subject to scrutineering checks before and/or after events and any changes resulting in rule breaches will incur the relevant penalties being applied. The track assessment criteria will include a technical track, a trailer tow and several challenges designed to test specific vehicle capabilities.
C9�1�1 Competition Class ProvisionsTrack Assessment applies to both the Development and Professional Class.
C9�1�2 Official REA Foundation Ltd TrackAt State and National Finals, the official 4x4 in Schools track will be provided and set-up by REA. The track arrangement MAY vary between State and National finals but generally, will consist of approximately 15 obstacles which MAY be divided into three (3) sections. These obstacles are designed and arranged to test the full capability of a team’s vehicle. Time limits will apply and where possible, teams should be familiar with these obstacles and practise across various terrains and conditions prior to an event.
C9�1�3 Who needs to attend?ALL Development and Professional Class team members must be present during and participate in their scheduled Track Assessment sessions, assembling at the track for briefing by the race track judges 5 minutes prior to their scheduled time.team MUST increase the car mass to at least the minimum mass prior to Submission using ONLYC9�1�4 Team PreparationEach team MUST ensure their vehicle is ready for their track assessment with the vehicle batteries fully charged and the transmitter/receiver synchronised. The team should review the track elements and decide which team member will drive what element. All team members should practice driving and controlling their vehicle as much as possible prior to the event. Teams will have a 5 minute slot to prepare the car. This will be supervised by the track judges.
C9�1�5 What will be assessed?The track assessment will test your vehicle’s 4x4 ability in a range of specific areas. Please read the Track Assessment score cards at the end of this section for detailed point scoring and key performance indicator information.
C9�1�6 Judging Process/ProcedureTeams will be awarded points as per the key performance indicators shown on the track assessment score card.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 33 of 60
C9�1�6�1 Damaged VehiclesIf a vehicle sustains damage during its attempt on the track it can continue on so long as all components remain intact.If a vehicle is damaged during its attempt on the track and any component separates from the vehicle, the team MUST repair the vehicle within the allocated track time limit before it can continue.Repairs MUST take place within the dedicated Vehicle Servicing area and will be strictly monitored by Race Marshalls. Damaged vehicles which are unable to be repaired during Track Assessment, WILL forfeit the remainder of the Track Assessment section but can be repaired during the scheduled Vehicle Servicing session immediately following the Track Assessment.C9�1�6�2 BreakdownsIf a vehicle breaks down during its attempt on the track it MAY be repaired within the allocated track time limit. It will then be allowed to continue on the track for the remaining time.Vehicles which are unable to be repaired WILL forfeit the remainder of the Track Assessment section but MAY be repaired during the scheduled Vehicle Servicing session immediately following the Track Assessment. Repairs MUST take place within the dedicated Vehicle Servicing area and WILL be strictly monitored by Race Marshalls.C9�1�6�3 Track ProcedureOne team member MAY be appointed as being responsible for positioning the vehicle in the beginning of each stage and transporting the car between stages.C9�1�6�4 Judges Handling CarsThe race Judges will NOT be required to comply with any special vehicle handling requests made of them by teams.C9�1�6�5 Radio Control FrequencyAt the beginning of the competition event you MAY be asked to declare your radio control frequency and channel being used. This is to avoid interference from teams using the same channel or frequency.C9�1�6�6 TransmitterYou WILL be asked not to turn your transmitter on until it is your track run. You MAY also be asked to hand in your transmitters at the beginning of the day and only be issued with them for your track run. C9�1�6�7 Time LimitA time limit for each track event WILL be announced on the day of competition.
C9�1�7 ObstaclesThe challenge obstacles MAY consist of natural terrain elements/tracks designed to test the most extreme capabilities of the vehicle. There MAY be several challenge obstacles each specifically designed to test certain vehicle capabilities (e.g. Maximum articulation, vehicle grip, Vehicle torque etc.). The challenges MAY be scored based on a distance covered, specific KPI’s or be a timed event, and WILL each make up a minor part of the track assessment criteria. Specific details about each challenge WILL be announced on the day of the event.
C9�1�8 Obstacle CourseThe obstacle course WILL consist of several manufactured obstacles (referred to as elements) and MAY include natural terrain as the track surface or track elements. The track surface MAY consist of sand, dirt and/or synthetic grass. The obstacle course is designed to test the basic capabilities of the vehicle and WILL make up the majority of the track assessment criteria.
C9�1�8�1 Layout• The track MAY be elevated above the floor, and so speed control is essential
to avoid damage to the vehicle.• The track MAY include a water crossing with a maximum depth of 50mm.
Teams should ensure that vehicle electrics and other vulnerable parts are protected up to this depth.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 34 of 60
• The track MAY include a tunnel to test the vehicles automatic lights sensors.• The track MAY include a slope with an angle of 25° to test the vehicles
lateral tilt detection system to trigger lights or a buzzer. C9�1�8�2 Scoring
• Teams WILL receive points for control on approach and exit of an element (scored via cones) and for successful completion of the track element (scored using various KPI’s).
• If a vehicle fails an element (via falling, rolling over or any incident that prevents progression), it WILL be reset after the element, resulting in a zero for that element. Time will NOT be stopped for teams to reset their vehicle.
• Teams MAY choose to skip an element at any time, receiving a zero for that element.
• In the event that a team exceeds the time limit, remaining elements WILL be scored a zero.
C9�1�8�3 Sections• The track MAY be split into sections for ease of judging. These sections MAY
be scheduled separately.• Each team member MUST attempt at least 1 track element.• The obstacle course WILL also include a trailer tow section that requires
teams to manoeuver their vehicle around a circuit, over obstacles and perform a reverse park. The trailer tow WILL be scored separately to the other sections.
C9�2 Trailer Test (40 points)Each vehicle will be expected to successfully tow a trailer and navigate around a specially made course designed to test your vehicle towing ability.
C9�2�1 What will be judged? The Trailer Test will test your vehicle’s towing ability in the following specific areas. • Tow Bar • Speed Control • Steering • Reversing Refer to the Trailer Test judging score card for key performance indicator information
C9�2�2 Team preparation Each team MUST ensure their vehicle is ready for their trailer test with the vehicle batteries fully charged and the transmitter/receiver are synchronised. The team SHOULD review the trailer course and decide which team member will drive. All team members SHOULD practice driving and controlling their vehicle as much as possible prior to the event.
C9�2�3 Who needs to attendThis judging session MUST be attended by all team members but only one (1) team member is required to drive/tow the trailer.
C9�2�4 Judging process / procedure Teams will be awarded points as per the key performance indicators shown on the trailer test score card.
C9�2�4�1 BreakdownsIf a vehicle breaks down during its attempt on the track it MAY be repaired within the allocated track time limit. It will then be allowed to continue on the track for the remaining time. The vehicle MAY only continue on track if all car components are fitted (example body shell).C9�2�4�2 Radio Control FrequencyAt the beginning of a competition event you MAY be asked to declare your radio control frequency and channel being used. This is to avoid interference from teams using the same channel or frequency.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 35 of 60
C9�2�4�3 TransmitterYou WILL be asked not to turn your transmitter on until it is your trailer test. You MAY also be asked to hand in your transmitters at the beginning of the day and only be issued with them for your trailer test. C9�2�4�4 Judges handling carsThe race Judges will NOT be required to comply with any special car handling requests made of them by teams.
ARTICLE C10 - VEHICLE SERVICING & REPAIRS
C10�1 General InformationC10�1�1 Dedicated AreaRepairs WILL be managed and monitored by a designated judge.Vehicle servicing and repairs MUST only take place at the dedicated Vehicle Servicing/Repair area. A maximum of two (2) team members and Judges are permitted to enter the car service area. NO other person is permitted to enter the servicing area or attempt to coach the teams through the servicing/repairs. Once the team members enter the servicing area, they are NOT permitted to leave until they have completed and handed the vehicle to the judge.Teams MUST keep the area clean of glue, lubricants and rubbish.NO graphite powder can be used to service/repair vehicles.
C10�1�2 Team Tool KitsTool kits are permitted to be taken into vehicle servicing. Teams MUST supply all of their own tools and other necessary resources. Judges will NOT be able to assist teams with any additional resource requirements.
C10�1�3 Optional Component ReplacementTeams are permitted to substitute components during Vehicle Servicing and Repair but these MUST be identical to the components fitted for Specifications Judging and MUST be approved by the Judge supervising the Vehicle Servicing area before being fitted to the vehicle.
C10�1�4 Judge’s DiscretionAll damage issues and related repair work is at the Judge’s discretion and MAY be referred to the scrutineer and/or Chair of Judges for a final decision.
C10�2 Penalty Free Servicing & RepairsAt State and National Final events, Professional and Development Class teams WILL be allocated the following penalty free Vehicle Servicing opportunities:
C10�2�1 Pre Track AssessmentImmediately prior to each scheduled Track Assessment session, teams WILL be provided with 5 minutes to check over their vehicle and substitute batteries if required.
C10�2�2 Repairs During Track AssessmentTeam members WILL be permitted to make repairs to a damaged car during Track Assessment within the allocated track time. Repairs MUST be undertaken within the dedicated Vehicle Servicing area and the clock will NOT be stopped for repairs.
C10�2�3 Post Track AssessmentImmediately after scheduled Track Assessment sessions, teams WILL be provided with 30 minutes to perform maintenance on vehicles.
C10�2�4 Pre Trailer TestImmediately prior to scheduled Trailer Tow sessions, teams WILL be provided with 5 minutes to check over their vehicle and substitute batteries if required.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 36 of 60
C10�3 Vehicle Servicing/Repair PenaltiesC10�3�1 Unrepaired VehiclesIf servicing or repair is NOT completed within the allocated scheduled Vehicle Servicing time and the vehicle is NOT in a legal configuration (all components attached), it will NOT be permitted to undertake the following scheduled track assessment. Teams MAY choose to use some or all of their time allocated to the following Track Assessment to bring their vehicle into a legal configuration. ARTICLES C9�1�6�1 and C10�3�2 apply.If a team uses all of its allocated track time to repair a vehicle, it WILL DNS the following Track Assessment and will NOT be permitted to continue until repairs are effected at a subsequent scheduled Vehicle Servicing session which bring the vehicle into a legal configuration.
C10�3�2 Repairs Deemed UnsafeAny repaired vehicle deemed unsafe to race by the Lead Track Judge, WILL result in a DNS for the following scheduled Track Assessment sessions until it can be repaired in a subsequent scheduled Vehicle Servicing session.
C10�3�3 Other Vehicle Servicing/Repair Penalties• Vehicle Body Servicing/Non approved replacement parts [Eligibility]
ARTICLE C11 - GRIEVANCES
C11�1 ProcedureC11�1�1 Specifications Compliance Related
7� Following the Specifications Compliance judging and prior to the commencement of Track Assessment sessions, teams found to have failed ANY critical regulations will be handed a document listing all infringements.
a� This document WILL NOT contain infringements of non-critical regulations.
b� It is the responsibility of team members to read, identify and respond to all of the infringements relating to failed critical regulations.
8� As per ARTICLE C4�1�4�3, teams WILL be given a special 60-minute vehicle servicing time to modify the vehicle so as to comply with the failed critical regulation/s. Students WILL need to hand it back to the supervising Scrutineer within the allocated 60 minutes.
9� Scrutineers will then recheck the vehicle for compliance and teams will be advised of the outcome as soon as possible thereafter.
10� SHOULD a team be dissatisfied with the decision of the Lead Scrutineer, an appeal MAY be submitted in writing by the advertised deadline using the official on-line Grievance Form. Refer ARTICLE C2�4�1�6�
11� The Chair of Judges WILL discuss the appeal with the scrutineers and MAY seek addi-tional advice from REA Foundation Ltd. regulation authorities. The Chair of Judges will then meet with the team, to discuss the appeal and explain the final decision.
C11�1�2 Non Specifications RelatedSubmitted by the advertised deadline using the official on-line Grievance Form. Teams will be advised of the outcome via item 7 above.
C11�2 Judge’s DecisionThe Chair of Judges decision related to ANY grievance is final and no further discussion will be entered into.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 37 of 60
ARTICLE C12 - JUDGES
C12�1 OverviewThere will be several teams of judges that form the entire judging panel Judges are generally higher education and industry experts invited by REA Foundation Ltd. They are selected and appointed to teams based on their qualifications and experience. All judges undertake a comprehensive briefing prior to the competition and are required to declare ANY conflicts of interest with respect to the teams they are judging. Where a conflict of interest MAY occur, the judge is required to step back from judging the relevant team/s.Some judges MAY perform a dual role. For example, undertake the specifications compliance of vehicles AND Engineering judging.Each judging category will have one judge appointed as the Lead Judge.
C12�2 Chair of JudgesAn independent authority appointed by REA Foundation Ltd. to oversee all judging procedures. The Chair of Judges will determine the final judging decision where a grievance has been submitted or other judging issue needs resolution. The Chair of Judges will also preside over a meeting of all Lead Judges to ratify the final results and work with the Competition Director to ensure all scores are entered correctly into a spread sheet to identify awards winners.
C12�3 The judging teamsC12�3�1 Specifications JudgesWill scrutinise each vehicle with respect to the Australian Technical Regulations.
C12�3�2 Engineering JudgesWill assess each team’s use of CAD/CAM, CNC technologies, quality of manufacture and the engineering design process.
C12�3�3 Portfolio JudgesPortfolio Judges will assess each team’s portfolio design and project management as per the Portfolio score card.
C12�3�4 Marketing JudgesMarketing Judges will assess each team’s branding and trade display as per the Marketing score card.
C12�3�5 Verbal Presentation JudgesVerbal presentation Judges will assess each team’s presentation technique and content as per the verbal presentation score card.
C12�3�6 Track Assessment & Trailer Tow JudgesWill oversee and rule on all race events and ANY incidents.
C12�3�7 Vehicle Servicing & Repairs JudgesCar Servicing Judges will oversee all car service activities and rule on ANY infringements that MAY occur.
C12�4 Judging DecisionsTHE DECISION OF THE JUDGES IS FINAL.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 38 of 60
ARTICLE C13 - AWARDS
C13�1 Awards CelebrationAt each State and National Final, an Awards Presentation is conducted, the timing of which is included in the Event Programme which is released closer to the event.At some National Finals, the Awards Presentation is combined with a Gala Dinner Celebration.
C13�2 Participation recognitionAt State and National Finals, all students, supervising teachers and judges will receive official participation/recognition certificates. These will be provided in the team and judge information packs.Students participating at a National Final will also receive participation medallions presented at the Awards Presentation ceremony.
C13�3 Prizes and TrophiesC13�3�1 State FinalsAt State Finals, teams winning an award will be presented with an A4 certificate ONLY.
C13�3�2 National FinalsAt National Finals, winning teams will be presented with an A3 framed certificate.
C13�3�3 Perpetual TrophiesPerpetual Trophies are presented for some but NOT all awards at National Finals ONLY. Teams receiving these trophies are responsible for having their team details engraved upon the trophy using identical material/engraving plates to maintain consistency of appearance. The teacher/school is responsible for returning the trophy to REA Foundation Ltd. prior to the following National Final.
C13�4 List of awards to be presentedNotes:
1� Eligibility for winning awards, requires teams to achieve at least 60% of the overall mark used to calculate overall 1st, 2nd and 3rd placings and Category Awards
2� Teams will unrectified critical regulation violations, will be ineligible for the Best Engineered and Best Track Performance Awards. Refer ARTICLE C3.10.1.3
3� In situations where there are five or less teams representing a competition class, overall 2nd and 3rd place, along with some category awards MAY NOT be presented. This will be at the discretion of the Chair of Judges.
C13�4�1 Development and Professional Class TeamsBEST TRACK PERFORMANCE²
The team with the highest combined score for:Criteria 11.1, 11.2 & 11.3: Track Assessment (Sections 1-3)
Criteria 11.4: Trailer TowBEST ENGINEERED AWARD5
Team with highest combined score for:Criteria 1: Engineering/Specifications
Criteria 2: Engineering/Vehicle Component EngineeringCriteria 3: Engineering/Design, Construction & Electronics
Criteria 4: Engineering/ Design ProcessBEST TEAM PORTFOLIO AWARD
Team with highest combined score for:Criteria 4: Engineering Design ProcessCriteria 5: Portfolio/Project Management
Criteria 6: Portfolio/Portfolio DesignCriteria 7.1, 7.2 & 7.3: Marketing/Branding
5 Not awarded to teams with unrectified Critical Regulation violations
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 39 of 60
BEST MANAGED ENTERPRISE AWARDTeam with highest score for:
Criteria 5: Portfolio/Project ManagementBEST GRAPHIC DESIGN AWARD
Team with highest combined score for:Criteria 6: Portfolio/Portfolio Design
Criteria 7: Marketing/BrandingCriteria 8.1, 8.3, 8.4 & 8.5: Marketing/Trade Display
BEST TEAM MARKETING AWARDTeam with highest combined score for:
Criteria 7: Marketing/BrandingCriteria 8: Marketing/Trade Display
Criteria 5.5: Portfolio/Project ManagementBEST TEAM VERBAL PRESENTATION AWARD
Team with highest combined score for:Criteria 9: Verbal Presentation/Presentation Technique
Criterial 10: Verbal Presentation/ContentOUTSTANDING INDUSTRY COLLABORATION AWARD
Team with highest score for:Criteria 10.5: Verbal Presentation/Content
INNOVATION AWARDTeam with highest score for:
Criteria 10.3 & 10.4: Verbal Presentation/ContentSUSTAINABILITY AWARD
Team with highest score for:Criteria 3.6: Engineering/Design, Construction & Electronics
Criteria 4.5: Engineering/Design ProcessCriteria 8.5 & 8.6: Marketing/Trade DisplayCriteria 10.5: Verbal Presentation/Content
CHAIR OF JUDGES RECOGNITION OF ACHIEVEMENT AWARDDiscretion of the Chair of Judges
BEST NEWCOMER AWARD6
Highest scoring team from school attending the National Final for the first time3RD PLACE
Team with the third highest scoring sum of all marking criteria2ND PLACE
Team with the second highest scoring sum of all marking criteriaCHAMPIONS
Team with the highest scoring sum of all marking criteria
Note: For Development Class teams there is no pathway to the World Finals
6 National Final award only
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 40 of 60
ARTICLE C14 - APPENDICES
C14�1 AWARDS MATRIXProfessional & Development Class Awards
Judging Category Judging Category Criteria Cham
pion
s2n
d Pl
ace
3rd
Plac
eBe
st N
ewco
mer
Best
Eng
inee
red
Best
Tra
ck P
erfo
rman
ceBe
st M
anag
ed E
nter
pris
eBe
st T
eam
Por
tfolio
Best
Gra
phic
Des
ign
Best
Tea
m M
arke
ting
Best
Tea
m V
erba
l Pre
sent
atio
nO
utst
andi
ng In
dust
ry C
olla
bora
tion
Inno
vatio
nSu
stai
nabi
lity
Engineering Specifications 1 SpecificationsEngineering Vehicle Component Engineering 2.1 Body Shell
2.2 Wheels & Tyres2.3 Tow Bar2.4 Chassis2.5 Suspension2.6 Steering2.7 Powertrain
Engineering Design, Construction & Electronics 3.1 Vehicle Aesthetics3.2 Vehicle Functionality3.3 Materials Used3.4 Manufacturing Processes3.5 Quality of Finish3.6 Sustainability3.7 Electronics Design3.8 Electronics Manufacture3.9 Coding
Engineering Design Process 4.1 Research4.2 Wheels & Tyres4.3 Specification Design4.4 Concept Selection4.5 Development & Manufacture4.6 Vehicle Testing & Improvement4.7 Overall Design Technical Merit
Portfolio Team & Project Management 5.1 Team Roles & Tasks5.2 Scope & Time Management5.3 Resource & Risk Management5.4 Internal Communications5.5 Stakeholder Engagement5.6 Skill Development for Future Careers5.7 Evaluation
Portfolio Portfolio Design 6.1 Production Quality of Materials6.2 Production Quality of Content6.3 Content Organisation6.4 Layout Design6.5 Typography6.6 Photos & Images6.7 Creative Graphics6.8 Editing/Proofreading6.9 Referencing/Plagiarism6.10 Writing & Readability
Marketing Branding 7.1 Team Name7.2 Logo Development7.3 Final Logo Design7.4 Logo Application7.5 Team Branding7.6 Media Exposure7.7 Sponsorship ROI7.8 Team Uniform7.9 Team Presence7.1 Team Knowledge
Marketing Trade Display 8.1 Vehicle Representation8.2 Prototype Models8.3 Information Design8.4 Use of ICT's8.5 Visual Design & Impact8.6 Structural Design8.7 Materials Selection & Use
Verbal Presentation Technique 9.1 Presentation Energy9.2 Team Contribution9.3 Visual Aids9.4 Audience Engagement9.5 Articulation9.6 Structure9.7 Use of Time
Verbal Presentation Content 10.1 Team Objectives10.2 Description of Vehicle Product10.3 Innovation/Refinement10.4 Collaboration10.5 Sustainability10.6 4x4 Learning Experiences10.7 Future Career Aspirations & Research10.8 Overall Clarity
Track Assessment Track Assessment 11.1 Track Assessment Section 111.2 Track Assessment Section 211.3 Track Assessment Section 311.4 Trailer Tow
This criteria not applicable to the Development Class at State Finals This criteria not applicable to the Development Class#
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May2019 Page 41 of 60
C14�2 DEVELOPMENT CLASS TRADE DISPLAYS - STATE FINALS
The intent of these amended regulations is to reduce the cost and complexity for Development Class teams participating in the competition. These restrictions ONLY apply to State Final competitions.
At National Final events NO restrictions will be placed upon Development Class teams.
State Final ArrangementsAt State Final events, REA Foundation Ltd will supply Development Class teams with fabric covered backboards with nominal dimensions of 2000mm (L) x 2400mm (H). Development Class teams MAY ONLY use 1800mm of the provided length situated immediately behind a supplied Trestle Table of the same length.Development Class teams MUST use a REA supplied trestle table at State Final events with nominal dimensions of 1800mm (L) x 750m (W) x 730mm (H). REA do NOT supply table cloths
Within the provided display, Development Class teams will ONLY be permitted to:
1� Display upon the backboard of the display within the identified 1800mm length, using ANY material no thicker than 10mm
2� Display upon the trestle table within the identified area with no separate or combined dis-play item/s being higher than 500mm.
3� Display at the front of the trestle table within the identified 1800mm length using ANY mate-rial no thicker than 10mm affixed or resting against the Trestle Table at 90° to the floor.
No other areas/surfaces within the display space provided can be used. The volume underneath the table can be used for storage ONLY but stored contents MUST NOT be visible from front or side view at ANY time throughout the event.
National Final ArrangementsAt National Finals, Development Class teams will be provided with a full shell scheme Trade Display with fascia. No restrictions other than those general conditions listed at ARTICLE C7.3.5 will apply.NO Trestle Tables will be supplied to ANY team at a National Final. Teams MUST construct their own display furniture to meet the maximum internal dimensions and fit within the volume of the display space provided.
2019 Land Rover 4x4 in Schools Australian Competition Regulations
Re-Engineering Australia Ltd. V1.0 May 2019 Page 42 of 60
C14�3 SHELL SCHEME TRADE DISPLAYThe diagrams below shows the nominal external dimensions and maximum internal build dimensions of the shell scheme trade display used for Professional Class teams at state finals and all teams at the National Final.
1940.00
2020.00
960.
00
1020
.00
2400
.00
2360
.00
1940.00
2020.00
960.
00
1020
.00
2400
.00
2360
.00
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
43
of 6
0
C14
�4
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T C
LASS
PO
RTF
OLI
O C
ON
TEN
T PA
GE
PLA
N
Deve
lopm
ent P
ortfo
lio P
age
Cont
ent P
lan:
Sugg
este
d co
nten
t org
anisa
tion
for a
sses
smen
t
Ente
rpris
e Po
rtfol
io:
Pr
ojec
t Man
agem
ent &
Car
eer D
evel
opm
ent
M
arketin
g&Partnerships
Engi
neer
ing
Portf
olio
:
En
gine
eringDe
signProcess
Team
Mgt:R
oles,
Respon
sibilitie
s&
Scop
e
***
Time,Finan
ce,R
isk
Comms,M
gt
Tools&
Metho
ds
*
Link
ingSkillsw
ith
FutureCaree
rs
*
Stakeh
olde
rROI
Plan
&Com
mun
ity
Activ
ity/PR
**
Team
Nam
e,Log
o,
Bran
ding
,Uniform
&
Trad
eBo
oth
***
Partne
rshipswith
ExternalIn
dividu
als
&Collabo
ratio
ns
*
Cove
r:*Re
ndering
Nam
e &
Log
o
***
VehicleDe
sign
Requ
iremen
ts&
Research
***
VehicleDe
sign
Idea
sSu
staina
bility
***
Vehicle
Man
ufacturin
g
***
Vehicle
Man
ufacturin
g B.O.M
.
***
VehicleDe
sign
PhysicalTe
sting
&
Evau
ation
***
To st
ream
line
the
judg
ing
proc
ess,
team
s ar
e to
arr
ange
the
cont
ent o
f the
ir En
terp
rise
and
Engi
neer
ing
Portf
olio
s in
acc
orda
nce
with
this
Cont
ent P
lan.
How
ever
the
num
ber o
f pa
ges
allo
cate
d to
the
sugg
este
d cr
iteria
abo
ve is
at t
he d
iscre
tion
of e
ach
team
.*
Com
pone
nts
of th
e Co
ver a
re c
ritica
l to
both
the
Ente
rpris
e &
Eng
inee
ring
Portf
olio
s
Pink
–Portfo
liocon
tentassessedinPortfo
liocriteria
Blue
–Portfo
liocon
tentassessedinBoo
thcriteria
Red–Po
rtfoliocon
tentassessedinEng
inee
ringcrite
riaGr
een–Assessed
inM
arketin
gcrite
ria
VehicleDe
sign
Deve
lopm
ent &
An
alysis
***
Cove
r:*N
ame
& L
ogo
***
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
44
of 6
0
C14
�5
PRO
FESS
ION
AL
CLA
SS P
OR
TFO
LIO
CO
NTE
NT
PAG
E PL
AN
Prof
essi
onal
Por
tfolio
Pag
e Co
nten
t Pla
n: Su
gges
ted
cont
ent o
rgan
isatio
n fo
r ass
essm
ent
Ente
rpris
e Po
rtfol
io:
Pr
ojec
t Man
agem
ent &
Car
eer D
evel
opm
ent
M
arketin
g&Partnerships
Engi
neer
ing
Portf
olio
:
En
gine
eringDe
signProcess
Team
Mgt:R
oles,
Respon
sibilitie
s&
Interacti
on
***
Proj
ect S
cope
&
TimeMan
agem
ent
Tools/
Metho
ds
*
Team
Finan
ces,Risk
M
anag
emen
tTools&
Metho
ds
*
Commun
icati
on
Tools&
Metho
ds
*
Link
ingSkillsw
ith
FutureCaree
rs
*
Team
Stakeho
lder
ROIP
lan&Acti
vity
**
Team
Com
mun
ity
Activ
ity/P
R&Social
Med
ia *
Team
Nam
e,Log
o&
Bran
ding
***
Uniform
&Boo
th
Desig
n
*
Partne
rshipswith
ExternalIn
dividu
als
&Collabo
ratio
ns
*
Cove
r:*Re
ndering
Nam
e &
Log
o
***
VehicleDe
sign
Requ
iremen
ts&
Research
***
VehicleDe
signIdea
sSu
staina
bility
***
VehicleDe
sign
Deve
lopm
ent
*
VehicleDe
sign
Deve
lopm
ent
***
VehicleDe
sign
Analysis
***
Vehicle
Man
ufacturin
g
***
Vehicle
Man
ufacturin
gB.O.M
***
VehicleDe
sign
PhysicalTe
sting
***
VehicleProcess
Evalua
tion
***
Free
fortea
msto
decide
con
tent
To st
ream
line
the
judg
ing
proc
ess,
team
s ar
e to
arr
ange
the
cont
ent o
f the
ir En
terp
rise
and
Engi
neer
ing
Portf
olio
s in
acc
orda
nce
with
this
Cont
ent P
lan.
How
ever
the
num
ber o
f pa
ges
allo
cate
d to
the
sugg
este
d cr
iteria
abo
ve is
at t
he d
iscre
tion
of e
ach
team
.*
Com
pone
nts
of th
e Co
ver a
re c
ritica
l to
both
the
Ente
rpris
e &
Eng
inee
ring
Portf
olio
s
Pink
–Portfo
liocon
tentassessedinPortfo
liocriteria
Blue
–Portfo
liocon
tentassessedinBoo
thcriteria
Red–Po
rtfoliocon
tentassessedinEng
inee
ringcrite
riaGr
een–Assessed
inM
arketin
gcrite
ria
Cove
r:*N
ame
& L
ogo
***
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
45
of 6
0
C14
�6
CR
ITER
IA 1
- SP
ECIF
ICAT
ION
SC
OR
E C
AR
D (1
OF
2)Fo
r cla
rifica
tion
on in
divi
dual
regu
latio
ns, r
efer
to th
e 20
19 A
ustr
alia
n Te
chni
cal R
egul
atio
ns.
Reg
ulat
ion
Reg
ulat
ion
Ove
rvie
wQ
uick
Gui
dePe
nalty
Vehi
cle
Judg
e 1
Judg
e 2
Ded
uctio
nR
emar
ksR
ectifi
catio
nA
RTI
CLE
C2
– G
ENER
AL
VEH
ICLE
REG
ULA
TIO
NS
Pass
/Fai
lC
2�5�
5�4
Non
app
rove
d m
odifi
catio
n to
Sta
rter K
itVi
sual
Che
ck
-10
Dev
elop
men
t Cla
ss o
nly
AR
TIC
LE T
3 –
VEH
ICLE
DIM
ENSI
ON
SPa
ss/F
ail
T3�1
Ove
rall
leng
th
Min
: 200
mm
M
ax: 3
60m
m
-10
T3�2
Ove
rall
wid
th
Min
: 100
mm
M
ax: 2
00m
m
-10
T3�3
Ove
rall
heig
ht
Min
: 100
mm
M
ax: 2
00m
m
-10
T3�4
Gro
und
clea
ranc
e M
in: 2
0mm
-5
T3�5
Appr
oach
ang
le
Min
: 25°
-5T3
�6D
epar
ture
ang
le
Min
: 25°
-5T3
�7Br
eak
Ove
r ang
le
Min
: 20°
-5A
RTI
CLE
T4
– D
RIV
E, W
HEE
LS &
STE
ERIN
GPa
ss/F
ail
T4�1
�1Po
wer
ed b
y on
e or
mor
e el
ectri
c m
otor
/sVi
sual
Che
ck-2
T4�1
�2C
apab
le o
f for
war
d an
d re
vers
e dr
ive
Dem
onst
ratio
n-2
T4�1
�3C
ater
pilla
r tra
cks
not p
erm
itted
Visu
al C
heck
-2T4
�2�1
Four
whe
els
only
Visu
al C
heck
-2T4
�2�2
All w
heel
s m
ust b
e dr
iven
Dem
onst
ratio
n-2
T4�3
�1�1
Two
or fo
ur w
heel
ste
erD
emon
stra
tion
-2Pr
ofes
sion
al C
lass
onl
yT4
�3�1
�2Tw
o w
heel
ste
er o
nly
Dem
onst
ratio
n-1
0D
evel
opm
ent C
lass
onl
yT4
�3�2
Func
tiona
l ste
erin
gD
emon
stra
tion
-2T4
�3�3
Tank
/ sk
id s
teer
Not
Per
mitt
ed-2
LEG
END
C
ritic
al R
egul
atio
ns/T
ime
Pena
lty
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
46
of 6
0
C14
�7
CR
ITER
IA 1
- SP
ECIF
ICAT
ION
SC
OR
E C
AR
D (2
OF
2)Fo
r cla
rifica
tion
on in
divi
dual
regu
latio
ns, r
efer
to th
e 20
19 A
ustr
alia
n Te
chni
cal R
egul
atio
ns.
Reg
ulat
ion
Reg
ulat
ion
Ove
rvie
wQ
uick
Gui
dePe
nalty
Vehi
cle
Judg
e 1
Judg
e 2
Ded
uctio
nR
emar
ksR
ectifi
catio
nA
RTI
CLE
T5
– VE
HIC
LE W
EIG
HT
Pass
/Fai
lT5
�1Ve
hicle
weigh
tM
ax 2
kg-1
5A
RTI
CLE
T6
– VE
HIC
LE B
OD
Y SH
ELL
Pass
/Fai
lT6
�1�1
All b
atte
ries c
over
ed
Visu
al C
heck
-5T6
�1�2
Mot
ors,
rece
ivers
& w
iring
cove
red
Visu
al C
heck
-5T6
�1�3
All fo
ur (4
) whe
els 1
00%
cove
red
in pla
n vie
wVi
sual
Che
ck-5
T6�1
�4Fi
rmly
secu
red
to th
e Ch
assis
In
tact
whe
n lif
ted
by b
ody
-5
T6�5
REA
Corp
orat
e Pa
rtner
Dec
als
(REA
, DoD
, VC
& 4x
4)Vi
sual
Che
ck-1
T6�6
REA
Corp
orat
e P
artn
er D
ecals
M
inim
um D
imen
sions
30m
m x
15m
m-1
AR
TIC
LE T
7 –
VEH
ICLE
ELE
CTR
ON
ICS
Pass
/Fai
lT7
�1La
tera
l Tilt
Sens
orLi
ght o
r buz
zer >
25° (
± 5°
)-1
0T7
�2Au
tom
atic
Light
sO
n w
hen
< 25
lux
(± 5
lux)
-10
AR
TIC
LE T
8 –
VEH
ICLE
CO
NTR
OL
EQU
IPM
ENT
Pass
/Fai
lT8
�1Di
gital
spee
d co
ntro
ller
Visu
al C
heck
-2T8
�2Dr
ive b
atte
ry p
ack
1 x
max
� 7�4
v-2
T8�3
Addit
ional
batte
ry p
acks
Max
imum
of 9
v-2
AR
TIC
LE T
9 –
TOW
BA
RPa
ss/F
ail
T9�1
Fixe
dVi
sual
Che
ck-5
T9�2
Suita
ble fo
r use
Abs�
max
pin
Ø 5
mm
-2T9
�3Re
tract,
fold
or p
ivot
Tool
-less
dep
loym
ent
-2
LEG
END
C
ritic
al R
egul
atio
ns/T
ime
Pena
lty
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
47
of 6
0
C14
�8
CR
ITER
IA 2
- EN
GIN
EER
ING
- VE
HIC
LE C
OM
PON
ENTS
SC
OR
E C
AR
D
Judg
ing
Sub
Cat
egor
yVe
hicl
e C
ompo
nent
sTe
am ID
Prim
ary
Evid
ence
Team
Inte
rvie
w &
Mod
elli
ng o
n Te
am C
ompu
ter
Team
Nam
e
Seco
ndar
y Ev
iden
ceTe
am E
ngin
eeri
ng P
ortf
olio
Scho
ol
Cri
teri
a2
Com
peti
tion
Cla
ss
Low
Dev
elop
ing
Adv
ance
dSc
ore
Cri
teri
a0
10
1 2
2 3
3 4
5 6
4 5
7 8
9 10
/5 /10
2.1
Bod
y Sh
ell
Dono
r bod
y use
d with
no m
odific
ation
. No a
ttemp
t to
cove
r key
mec
hanic
al co
mpon
ents.
Evide
nce o
f mod
ificati
on do
ne to
origi
nal b
ody
shell
. Se
lf-mad
e bod
y. Co
nstru
cted w
ell, ro
bust
and s
ome a
fter tr
eatm
ent e
viden
t. /1
0
2.2
Whe
els
&
Tyre
s
Off th
e she
lf whe
els/ty
res. L
ittle t
houg
ht giv
en to
selec
tion.
Basic
unde
rstan
ding o
f whe
el an
d tyre
desig
n and
how
they w
ork.
Off th
e she
lf whe
els/ty
res. S
ome t
houg
ht sh
own i
n se
lectio
n. Go
od un
derst
andin
g of w
heel
and t
yre
desig
n and
how
they w
ork.
Off th
e she
lf or m
anufa
ctured
whe
els/ty
res. G
ood t
houg
ht sh
own i
n sele
ction
. Ex
celle
nt un
derst
andin
g of w
heel
and t
yre de
sign a
nd ho
w the
y work
. /1
0
2.3
Tow
Bar
Simple
tow
bar w
ith ba
sic un
derst
andin
g of h
ow it
works
Fu
nctio
nal to
w ba
r, goo
d lev
el of
unde
rstan
ding o
f the
requ
ireme
nts fo
r towi
ng he
avy l
oads
Inv
entiv
e tow
bar d
esign
, sho
wing
good
unde
rstan
ding o
f towi
ng dy
nami
cs.
Cons
tructe
d well
, robu
st an
d som
e afte
r trea
tmen
t evid
ent.
/10
2.4
Cha
ssis
¹Of
f the s
helf c
hass
is us
ed. B
asic
unde
rstan
ding o
f cha
ssis
desig
n and
how
it work
s.
Off th
e she
lf cha
ssis
modifi
ed to
suit r
equir
emen
ts.
Good
unde
rstan
ding o
f cha
ssis
desig
n and
how
it work
s.
Desig
ned a
nd m
anufa
ctured
own c
hass
is. E
xcell
ent u
nders
tandin
g of c
hass
is de
sign a
nd ho
w it w
orks.
/5
2.5
Susp
ensi
onOf
f the s
helf s
uspe
nsion
syste
m us
ed. B
asic
unde
rstan
ding o
f sus
pens
ion de
sign a
nd ho
w it w
orks.
Off th
e she
lf veh
icle s
uspe
nsion
syste
m mo
dified
to
suit r
equir
emen
ts. G
ood u
nders
tandin
g of
susp
ensio
n des
ign an
d how
it wo
rks.
Desig
ned a
nd m
anufa
ctured
own s
uspe
nsion
syste
m. E
xcell
ent
unde
rstan
ding o
f sus
pens
ion de
sign a
nd ho
w it w
orks.
/10
2.6
Stee
ring¹
Off th
e she
lf stee
ring s
ystem
used
. Bas
ic un
derst
andin
g of
steeri
ng de
sign a
nd ho
w it w
orks.
Off th
e she
lf stee
ring s
ystem
mod
ified t
o suit
req
uirem
ents.
Goo
d und
erstan
ding o
f stee
ring
desig
n and
how
it work
s.
Desig
ned a
nd m
anufa
ctured
own s
teerin
g sys
tem. E
xcell
ent u
nders
tandin
g of
steeri
ng de
sign a
nd ho
w it w
orks.
/10
2.7
Pow
ertr
ain¹
Off th
e she
lf pow
ertrai
n use
d. Ba
sic un
derst
andin
g of
powe
rtrain
desig
n and
how
it work
s.
Off th
e she
lf pow
ertrai
n mod
ified t
o suit
req
uirem
ents.
Goo
d und
erstan
ding o
f pow
ertrai
n de
sign a
nd ho
w it w
orks.
Desig
ned a
nd m
anufa
ctured
own p
owert
rain.
Exce
llent
unde
rstan
ding o
f po
wertr
ain de
sign a
nd ho
w it w
orks.
/10
¹ C
riter
ia n
ot a
pplic
able
to th
e D
evel
opm
ent C
lass
Vehi
cle
Com
pone
nts
GR
AN
D T
OTA
L –
Dev
� Cla
ss/4
0
Vehi
cle
Com
pone
nts
GR
AN
D T
OTA
L –
Pro�
Cla
ss/6
5
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
48
of 6
0
C14
�9
CR
ITER
IA 3
- EN
GIN
EER
ING
: DES
IGN
, CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
& E
LEC
TRO
NIC
S SC
OR
E C
AR
DJu
dgin
g Su
b C
ateg
ory
Des
ign
Con
stru
ctio
n &
Elec
tron
ics
Team
ID
Prim
ary
Evid
ence
Team
Inte
rvie
w &
Mod
elli
ng o
n Te
am C
ompu
ter
Team
Nam
e
Seco
ndar
y Ev
iden
ceTe
am E
ngin
eeri
ng P
ortf
olio
Scho
ol
Cri
teri
a3
Com
peti
tion
Cla
ss
Low
Dev
elop
ing
Adv
ance
dSc
ore
Cri
teri
a0
10
1 2
2 3
3 4
5 6
4 5
7 8
9 10
/5 /10
3.1
Vehi
cle
Aes
thet
ics
Limite
d evid
ence
of ae
stheti
c con
sidera
tion,
vehic
le ha
s a fu
nctio
nal a
ppea
rance
.At
tracti
ve de
sign s
howi
ng co
nside
ration
of ae
stheti
c iss
ues.
Some
uniqu
e des
ign fe
atures
. Un
ique,
eye c
atchin
g aes
thetic
s, sh
owing
clea
r und
erstan
ding o
f des
ign
princ
iples
and a
ttenti
on to
detai
l. /1
5
3.2
Vehi
cle
Func
tiona
lity
Limite
d evid
ence
of lo
gical
decis
ion m
aking
. Ve
hicle
not fi
t for p
urpos
e. Go
od lo
gical
decis
ion m
aking
. Mos
t elem
ents
of ve
hicle
fit for
purpo
se.
High
leve
l of d
esign
trade
-off. G
ood l
ogica
l dec
ision
mak
ing. A
ll elem
ents
of ve
hicle
fit for
purpo
se. S
ome e
viden
ce of
risk t
aking
./2
0
3.3
Mat
eria
ls
Use
dLim
ited m
ateria
l sele
ction
s mad
e. Ba
sic
unde
rstan
ding o
f mate
rial p
ropert
ies.
Some
evide
nce o
f logic
al ma
terial
selec
tions
. Goo
d un
derst
andin
g of m
ateria
l prop
erties
. Go
od ev
idenc
e of lo
gical
mater
ial se
lectio
ns. E
xcell
ent u
nders
tandin
g of
mater
ials a
nd th
eir ap
plica
tions
. /1
5
3.4
Ort
hogr
aphi
c D
raw
ing/
sLit
tle or
no de
tail. L
ittle o
r no a
nnota
tion.
Third
angle
ortho
graph
ic pro
jectio
n. Ex
cess
ive of
insu
fficien
t de
tail.
Third
angle
ortho
graph
ic pro
jectio
n and
unren
dered
isom
etric
view
or sim
ilar. P
arts l
ist / B
.O.M
. Add
itiona
l view
s to s
how
suffic
ient d
etail.
Regu
lation
comp
lianc
e sho
wn.
/15
3.5
Man
ufac
turin
g Pr
oces
ses
Limite
d man
ufactu
ring p
roces
ses p
erform
ed.
Basic
unde
rstan
ding o
f man
ufactu
ring
proce
sses
.
A ran
ge of
man
ufactu
ring p
roces
ses p
erform
ed. G
ood
unde
rstan
ding o
f man
ufactu
ring p
roces
ses.
Wide
rang
e of a
pprop
riate
manu
factur
ing pr
oces
ses u
sed.
Exce
llent
know
ledge
and u
nders
tandin
g of m
anufa
cturin
g proc
esse
s. /2
0
3.6
Qua
lity
of
Fini
shBa
sic co
nstru
ction
with
roug
h, un
finish
ed
eleme
nts.
Good
quali
ty of
manu
factur
e evid
ent in
man
y elem
ents,
ve
hicle
show
s som
e con
sidera
tion o
f surf
ace fi
nishe
s. Ex
celle
nt qu
ality
of fin
ish th
rough
out th
e veh
icle,
show
ing hi
gh qu
ality
surfa
ce fin
ish an
d atte
ntion
to de
tail.
/20
3.7
Sust
aina
bilit
yLit
tle/ n
o evid
ence
of S
ustai
nabil
ity co
nside
red
in ma
terial
s and
man
ufactu
ring.
Some
evide
nce o
f Sus
taina
bility
cons
iderin
g rec
yclab
ility,
mater
ial ch
oices
and i
mpac
t of m
anufa
cturin
g proc
esse
s. Th
oroug
h acc
ount
of su
staina
bility
cons
iderin
g rec
yclab
ility,
life cy
cle,
CO2 f
ootpr
int, m
ateria
l cho
ices a
nd im
pact
of ma
nufac
turing
proc
esse
s /1
5
3.8
Elec
tron
ics
Des
ign
Basic
circu
it des
ign sh
owing
little
crea
tivity
. Ba
sic un
derst
andin
g of e
lectro
nics.
Some
evide
nce o
f logic
al ele
ctron
ic cir
cuit d
esign
. Som
e un
derst
andin
g of e
lectro
nics.
Good
unde
rstan
ding o
f elec
tronic
s crea
tively
appli
ed to
desig
n effe
ctive
sy
stems
. /2
0
3.9
Elec
tron
ics
Man
ufac
ture
Limite
d elec
tronic
s man
ufactu
ring p
roces
ses
perfo
rmed
. Bas
ic un
derst
andin
g of
manu
factur
ing pr
oces
ses.
A ran
ge of
elec
tronic
s man
ufactu
ring p
roces
ses p
erform
ed,
show
ing so
me un
derst
andin
g of a
pprop
riate
proce
sses
. W
ide ra
nge o
f elec
tronic
s man
ufactu
ring p
roces
ses u
sed.
Good
kn
owled
ge an
d und
erstan
ding o
f app
ropria
te pro
cess
es.
/20
3.10
C
odin
gLit
tle or
no us
e of c
oding
to en
hanc
e veh
icle
functi
onali
ty.
Codin
g use
d to p
erform
some
basic
func
tions
, sho
wing
some
un
derst
andin
g of p
rogram
ming
. Go
od un
derst
andin
g of p
rogram
ming
appli
ed to
crea
ting a
dvan
ced
vehic
le fun
ction
s via
a prog
ramma
ble co
mpute
r. /2
0
Desig
n, C
onst
. & E
lectro
nics
GRA
ND T
OTAL
/180
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
49
of 6
0
C14
�10
CR
ITER
IA 4
- EN
GIN
EER
ING
: DES
IGN
PR
OC
ESS
SCO
RE
CA
RD
Judg
ing
Sub
Cat
egor
yEn
gine
erin
g D
esig
n Pr
oces
sTe
am ID
Prim
ary
Evid
ence
Team
Eng
inee
ring
Por
tfol
io:
Team
Nam
e
Seco
ndar
y Ev
iden
ceSc
hool
Cri
teri
a4
Com
peti
tion
Cla
ss
Low
Dev
elop
ing
Adv
ance
dSc
ore
Cri
teri
a0
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
/10
4.1
Res
earc
hLit
tle ev
idenc
e of re
searc
h into
dif
feren
t sys
tems u
sed i
n 4x4
ve
hicles
and t
heir p
urpos
e.
Good
overv
iew of
diffe
rent 4
x4 sy
stems
and
basic
unde
rstan
ding o
f why
they
are u
sed.
Good
int
erpret
ation
of in
forma
tion.
Rang
e of re
searc
h tec
hniqu
es of
the d
ifferen
t tech
nolog
ies &
syste
ms us
ed
on m
ulti te
rrain
vehic
les. S
uitab
le en
ginee
ring p
rincip
les id
entifi
ed an
d jus
tified
for th
e tas
k /1
5
4.2
Whe
els
& T
yres
Basic
list o
f poin
ts de
scrib
ing a
numb
er of
eleme
nts re
quire
d Ba
sic us
e of re
searc
h to c
reate
a deta
iled l
ist
desc
ribing
impo
rtant
aspe
cts of
the p
rojec
t. Re
searc
h use
d to c
reate
detai
led, fu
lly ju
stifie
d des
ign sp
ecific
ation
, cov
ering
ke
y asp
ects
of the
proje
ct.
/10
4.3
Spec
ifica
tion
Des
ign
One p
age s
howi
ng a
few ba
sic
sketc
hes o
r mod
els, li
ttle an
notat
ion
One p
age s
howi
ng at
leas
t 4 an
notat
ed id
eas,
using
dif
feren
t med
ia an
d sho
wing
some
crea
tivity
Tw
o or m
ore pa
ges s
howi
ng a
wide
rang
e of in
itial d
esign
conc
epts,
inclu
ding
detai
led an
notat
ions,
3D sk
etchin
g and
mod
elling
. /2
0
4.4
Con
cept
Se
lect
ion
Conc
ept d
ecide
d on w
ith lit
tle
reaso
ning o
r evid
ence
of a
selec
tion
proce
ss.
Selec
tion o
f bas
ic co
ncep
ts, us
e of a
selec
tion
proce
ss to
reco
rd str
ength
s and
wea
knes
ses o
f ide
as.
Comp
rehen
sive s
electi
on pr
oces
s res
ulting
in fu
lly ju
stifie
d fina
l des
ign
decis
ion, e
xami
ned a
gains
t the D
esign
Spe
cifica
tion.
/10
4.5
Dev
elop
men
t &
Man
ufac
ture
Limite
d dev
elopm
ent &
poor
manu
factur
e rec
ord.
Desig
n dev
elopm
ent c
overi
ng co
ncep
t to
manu
factur
e, ba
sic co
mpon
ent s
electi
on an
d ma
nufac
turing
proc
esse
s.
Comp
rehen
sive d
esign
deve
lopme
nt, co
mpon
ent s
electi
on an
d Bill
of Ma
terial
s (BO
M). A
ll man
ufactu
ring p
roces
ses d
efine
d. Su
staina
bility
ad
dress
ed th
rough
out.
/20
4.6
Vehi
cle
Test
ing
&
Impr
ovem
ent
Little
or no
evide
nce o
f veh
icle
testin
g or im
prove
ment.
So
me te
sting
cond
ucted
and r
unnin
g cha
nges
mad
e. Co
mpreh
ensiv
e veh
icle t
estin
g con
ducte
d, res
ults a
nalys
ed, c
hang
es m
ade
and r
e-eva
luated
. Impro
veme
nt in
perfo
rman
ce re
corde
d. /1
0
4.7
Ove
rall
Des
ign
Tech
nica
l Mer
itBa
sic de
sign p
roces
s with
little
tec
hnica
l meri
t De
velop
ed de
sign p
roces
s with
some
tech
nical
merit
Origi
nal &
clev
er de
velop
ed de
sign p
roces
s with
exce
llent
techn
ical m
erit
/15
Desig
n Pr
oces
s GRA
ND T
OTAL
/100
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
50
of 6
0
C14
�11
CR
ITER
IA 5
- PO
RTF
OLI
O: P
RO
JEC
T M
AN
AG
EMEN
T &
CA
REE
R D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
SCO
RE
CA
RD
Judg
ing
Sub
Cat
egor
yPr
ojec
t M
anag
emen
t &
Car
eer
Dev
elop
men
tTe
am ID
Prim
ary
Evid
ence
Team
Ent
erpr
ise
Port
foli
oTe
am N
ame
Seco
ndar
y Ev
iden
ceSc
hool
Cri
teri
a5
Com
peti
tion
Cla
ss
Low
Dev
elop
ing
Adv
ance
dSc
ore
Cri
teri
a0
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
/10
5�1
Team
Rol
es &
Tas
ksLim
ited u
nders
tandin
g of ro
les
and r
espo
nsibi
lities
Te
am ro
les an
d res
pons
ibiliti
es id
entifi
edHi
ghly
struc
tured
team
with
clea
r role
s and
resp
onsib
ilities
. All t
eam
memb
ers pr
ovide
critic
al co
ntribu
tions
with
evide
nce o
f sup
portiv
e/ove
rlapp
ing in
terac
tions
. Rele
vant
skill
deve
lopme
nt/me
ntorin
g und
ertak
en. P
lan C
hang
es di
scus
sed
/10
5�2
Scop
e &
Tim
e M
anag
emen
t
Limite
d und
erstan
ding o
f sc
ope o
r evid
ence
of tim
e ma
nage
ment
Some
plan
ning u
sed t
o guid
e prog
ress o
f pro
ject g
oals
and s
tay on
task
.
Exce
llent
contr
ol of
all pr
oject
deliv
erable
s und
erstan
ding r
equir
emen
ts an
d sett
ing go
als to
ma
intain
focu
s and
evide
nce o
f usin
g effe
ctive
man
agem
ent m
ethod
s and
tools
to st
ay on
task
an
d mee
t dea
dline
s. Pla
n Cha
nges
disc
usse
d/10
5�3
Fina
nce
& R
isk
Man
agem
ent
Limite
d bud
getin
g or r
isk
aware
ness
Some
reso
urces
iden
tified
, bud
getin
g and
co
nting
ency
plan
s
Exce
llent
resou
rce m
anag
emen
t, und
erstan
ding o
f bud
get c
ontro
l and
evide
nce o
f fina
ncial
ac
coun
ting m
ethod
s. Re
ason
able
conti
ngen
cy pl
an an
d risk
asse
ssme
nt pre
pared
and/o
r un
derta
ken.
/10
5�4
Inte
rnal
C
omm
unic
atio
n Lim
ited t
eam
comm
unica
tion
Basic
team
comm
unica
tion p
roces
ses
discu
ssed
.Ex
celle
nt us
e of m
ultipl
e com
munic
ation
tools
and m
ethod
s for
effec
tive t
eam
plann
ing an
d ac
coun
tabilit
y./10
5�5
Stak
ehol
der
Enga
gem
ent
Limite
d stak
ehold
er en
gage
ment
Basic
unde
rstan
ding a
nd ap
plica
tion o
f sta
keho
lder e
ngag
emen
tEx
celle
nt un
derst
andin
g and
appli
catio
n of in
itiatin
g and
main
tainin
g stak
ehold
er en
gage
ment
with
colla
borat
ors, s
pons
ors, m
entor
s and
supp
orters
using
mult
iple t
ools
and m
ethod
s. /10
5�6
Skill
Dev
elop
men
t for
Fu
ture
Car
eers
No or
little
effor
t to id
entify
sk
ills an
d link
them
to D
efenc
e Ind
ustry
Care
ers
A goo
d effo
rt by t
he te
am to
iden
tify
indivi
dual
skills
deve
loped
but m
ore w
ork
need
ed to
link t
hese
with
Defe
nce I
ndus
try
caree
rs.
Demo
nstra
ble ev
idenc
e in p
ortfol
io by
team
to id
entify
and r
ecord
seve
ral in
dustr
y spe
cific a
nd
emplo
yabil
ity sk
ills de
velop
ed th
rough
their
partic
ipatio
n in F
1 in S
choo
ls an
d how
thes
e can
link
to fut
ure ca
reers
withi
n Defe
nce I
ndus
tries.
/20
5�7
Eval
uatio
nLim
ited e
valua
tion
Some
evalu
ation
appli
edEv
aluati
on pr
oces
ses a
pplie
d thro
ugho
ut the
man
agem
ent o
f key
deliv
erable
s./10
Proj
ect M
anag
emen
t & C
aree
r Dev
elopm
ent G
RAND
TOT
AL/80
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
51
of 6
0
C14
�12
CR
ITER
IA 6
- PO
RTF
OLI
O: P
OR
TFO
LIO
DES
IGN
- C
LAR
ITY
& Q
UA
LITY
SC
OR
E C
AR
D
Judg
ing
Sub
Cat
egor
yD
esig
n: C
lari
ty &
Qua
lity
Team
ID
Prim
ary
Evid
ence
Team
Ent
erpr
ise
& En
gine
erin
g Po
rtfo
lios
Team
Nam
e
Seco
ndar
y Ev
iden
ceN
ilSc
hool
Cri
teri
a6
Com
peti
tion
Cla
ss
Low
Dev
elop
ing
Adv
ance
dSc
ore
Cri
teri
a0
12
34
5/5
6.1
Prod
uctio
n Qu
ality
of
Mate
rials
Poor
quali
ty Ba
sic pr
inting
and b
inding
. Qu
ality
printe
d doc
umen
t on q
uality
pape
r in ap
propri
ately
durab
le bin
ding
/5
6.2
Prod
uctio
n Qu
ality
of
Cont
ent
Miss
ing do
cume
ntatio
nBa
sic do
cume
ntatio
n prov
ided.
Corre
ct nu
mber
of pa
ges.
All re
quire
d doc
umen
tation
inclu
ded a
nd pr
ofess
ionall
y pres
ented
. Car
rende
ring a
nd te
am lo
go on
cove
r pag
e in k
eepin
g with
bran
ding.
/5
6.3
Cont
ent O
rgan
isatio
nDi
sorga
nised
conte
ntSo
me co
ntent
organ
isatio
nHi
ghly
organ
ised a
nd m
anag
ed po
rtfolio
conte
nt wi
th log
ical s
tructu
re an
d flow
of in
forma
tion.
/5
6.4
Layo
ut D
esig
nDi
strac
ting i
mperf
ectio
ns
weak
en th
e work
Some
layo
ut de
sign f
ormat
attem
pted.
Well
form
atted
layo
ut de
sign c
onsis
tently
apply
ing m
argins
, alig
nmen
t, spa
cing,
graph
ics an
d des
ign
eleme
nts w
ith co
nside
ration
of vi
sual
balan
ce an
d flow
. All p
ages
optim
ally u
sed a
nd un
clutte
red.
Crea
tive s
tyle r
ealis
ed.
/5
6.5
Typo
grap
hyFo
nt ch
oices
distr
actin
g or
weak
en th
e work
Some
cons
iderat
ion fo
r type
treatm
ent.
Cons
isten
t use
of ty
pogra
phy w
ith ap
propri
ate ch
oices
and l
imite
d num
ber o
f text
and h
eadli
ne fo
nt siz
es, s
tyles
, colo
urs an
d hier
archy
. In ke
eping
with
bran
ding.
Easy
to re
ad.
/5
6.6
Phot
os &
Imag
esPo
or qu
ality
or us
e of im
ages
. No
capti
oning
.Ba
sic qu
ality
and u
se of
imag
es. S
ome
reaso
nably
conc
ise ca
ption
ing.
Justi
fied u
se of
exce
llent,
un-pi
xella
ted, c
lear, u
ndist
orted
photo
s and
imag
es th
at are
conc
isely
and
accu
rately
capti
oned
. Prop
erly s
ized,
colou
red an
d inte
grated
with
text
to illu
strate
key m
essa
ges.
Cons
iders
brand
ing.
/5
6.7
Crea
tive G
raph
ics (V
isual
effe
cts a
nd in
fogr
aphi
cs)
Poor
graph
ics an
d/or e
xecu
tion.
No ca
ption
ing.
Grap
hics a
ttemp
ted w
ith so
me su
cces
s. So
me re
ason
ably
conc
ise ca
ption
ing.
Justi
fied,
well e
xecu
ted an
d plac
ed, u
n-pixe
llated
, und
istort
ed gr
aphic
s tha
t are
conc
isely
and
accu
rately
capti
oned
. Con
sisten
t use
of co
lour/ t
ones
/ sha
pes,
witho
ut vis
ual o
verlo
ad, in
keep
ing
with
brand
ing.
/5
6.8
Editi
ng/P
roof
read
ing
Error
ridde
n. Po
or att
empt
at pro
ofrea
ding.
Good
attem
pt wi
th ad
dition
al ed
iting
requir
ed fo
r clar
ity.
No er
rors d
etecte
d in t
ext a
nd gr
aphic
s/5
6.9
Refe
renc
ing/
Plag
iarism
Obvio
us fa
ilures
in re
feren
cing.
Some
attem
pt at
refere
ncing
. Som
e err
ors ev
ident.
No de
tected
plag
iarism
with
exce
llent
use o
f refer
encin
g for
autho
r’s w
ritten
word
, grap
hics/p
hotos
an
d vide
o sou
rces e
tc/5
6.10
Writ
ing
& Re
adab
ility
Diffic
ult to
unde
rstan
d. Un
able
to rea
d.Do
es no
t sus
tain r
eadin
g or in
teres
t. Do
es no
t ‘flow
’.Co
ncise
, app
ropria
te, gr
amma
ticall
y corr
ect te
xt, ca
ption
s, an
d hea
dline
s. Inv
iting a
nd en
gagin
g. Su
stains
the r
eade
r’s in
teres
t./5
Clar
ity &
Qua
lity G
RAND
TOT
AL/50
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
52
of 6
0
C14
�13
CR
ITER
IA 7
- M
AR
KET
ING
: BR
AN
DIN
G S
CO
RE
CA
RD
Judg
ing
Sub
Cat
egor
yB
rand
ing
Team
ID
Prim
ary
Evid
ence
Team
Inte
rvie
w a
t Tr
ade
Dis
play
Team
Nam
e
Seco
ndar
y Ev
iden
ceTe
am E
nter
pris
e Po
rtfo
lio
Scho
ol
Cri
teri
a7
Com
peti
tion
Cla
ss
Low
Dev
elop
ing
Adv
ance
dSc
ore
Cri
teri
a0
11
2 3
2 3
4 5
64
57
8 9
10/5 /10
7.1
Team
Nam
e*Irre
levan
t cho
iceLim
ited c
onsid
eratio
n of m
eanin
gWe
ll con
sidere
d, me
aning
ful te
am na
me ap
propri
ate to
goals
and i
mage
proje
ction
./5
7.2
Logo
Dev
elopm
ent*
Limite
d ide
as &
deve
lopme
nt. N
o ori
ginal
work
evide
ntSo
me lo
go id
ea pr
ogres
sion &
crea
tive l
ogo
modifi
catio
n of ty
pe or
grap
hics n
oted.
A num
ber o
f logo
idea
s con
sidere
d with
atten
tion t
o tea
m go
als an
d ide
ntity.
Crea
tive &
origi
nal lo
go
deve
lopme
nt cle
arly r
elates
to th
e tea
m’s c
hose
n nam
e, ide
ntity
and p
urpos
e./5
7.3
Fina
l Log
o De
sign*
Team
logo
is ab
sent
or co
nfusin
g.Lo
go m
essa
ge is
simp
le an
d obv
ious.
Stron
g tea
m log
o tha
t grab
s atte
ntion
, gen
erates
a po
sitive
resp
onse
, and
is ea
sily re
cogn
ised a
nd re
calle
d. We
ll con
sidere
d use
of co
lours,
type
and s
hape
s enh
ance
mea
ning.
In ke
eping
with
bran
ding.
/5
7.4
Logo
App
licat
ion
Poor
quali
ty rep
roduc
tion,
limite
d tea
m log
o bad
ging.
Most
items
are b
adge
d with
team
logo
. Tea
m log
o qu
ality
dimini
shed
whe
n enla
rged o
r redu
ced a
cross
ap
plica
tions
.
Team
logo
scale
s well
to la
rge an
d sma
ll bad
ging a
pplica
tions
. All a
pplica
tions
are o
f high
quali
ty an
d ap
propri
ately
posit
ioned
for s
trong
impa
ct./5
7.5
Team
Bra
ndin
gBr
andin
g mes
sage
is w
eak w
ith
incon
sisten
t app
licatio
n acro
ss th
e pro
ject.
Effec
tive t
eam
brand
ing co
nsist
ently
appli
ed ac
ross
projec
t com
pone
nts.
Exce
llent
and h
ighly
effec
tive m
essa
ging o
f team
imag
e. Qu
ality
and c
onsis
tent b
randin
g of te
am na
me, lo
go,
typog
raphy
, & co
lours
appli
ed ac
ross a
ll proj
ect e
lemen
ts: po
rtfolio
, unif
orms,
car, d
isplay
, soc
ial m
edia
and
colla
teral.
Icon
, tagli
ne or
mas
cot a
dded
to st
rength
en br
andin
g/1
0
7.6
Medi
a Exp
osur
eLim
ited o
r ineff
ectiv
e.So
me de
velop
ment,
some
impa
ct, so
me
cons
iderat
ion of
audie
nce a
nd pl
atform
s.
Clear,
deve
loped
, high
impa
ct me
dia st
rateg
y, inc
luding
socia
l med
ia. C
areful
cons
iderat
ion of
targe
t aud
ience
an
d suit
able
platfo
rms.
Evide
nce o
f atte
mpt to
work
with
med
ia bro
adca
sters/
publi
shers
with
some
docu
mente
d su
cces
s./5
7.7
Team
Spo
nsor
s &
REA
Corp
orat
e Pa
rtner
s ROI
Little
or no
ROI
.Sp
onso
rship
ackn
owled
ged.
Some
logo
s inc
luded
in
projec
t coll
ateral
.Cle
ar an
d app
ropria
te vis
ibility
of te
am sp
onso
rs an
d REA
Corp
orate
Partn
ers. Q
uality
repro
ducti
on of
ap
propri
ate sp
onso
r and
REA
Corp
orate
Partn
er log
os ac
ross a
ll proj
ect c
ollate
ral as
requ
ired.
/10
7.8
Team
Uni
form
Ineffe
ctive
or in
cons
isten
t, sam
e or
simila
r to su
pport
ers.
Basic
and c
onsis
tent a
cross
the t
eam,
disti
nct fr
om
supp
orters
.Cr
eativ
e and
cons
idered
use o
f bran
ding a
nd ap
propri
ate st
yling f
or all
mem
bers.
Team
mem
ber n
ames
and
roles
clea
rly id
entifi
ed. C
learly
disti
nct fr
om su
pport
ers.
/5
7.9
Team
Pre
senc
eNo
t all p
resen
t / Po
or en
ergy.
Gene
rally
enthu
siasti
c.All
team
mem
bers
are ap
propri
ately
enga
ging a
nd en
thusia
stic a
bout
their w
ork.
/5
7.10
Te
am K
nowl
edge
Limite
d eng
agem
ent.
Some
mem
bers
know
ledge
able.
Each
mem
ber is
high
ly kn
owled
geab
le in
their r
ole an
d also
broa
dly kn
owled
geab
le ab
out d
etails
of the
ir entr
y. Ab
le to
defer
to ot
hers
with c
onfid
ence
and s
hare
projec
t own
ership
./5
Bra
ndin
g GR
AND
TOTA
L/6
0
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
53
of 6
0
C14
�14
CR
ITER
IA 8
- M
AR
KET
ING
: TR
AD
E D
ISPL
AY S
CO
RE
CA
RD
Judg
ing
Sub
Cat
egor
yTr
ade
Dis
play
Team
ID
Prim
ary
Evid
ence
Trad
e D
ispl
ayTe
am N
ame
Seco
ndar
y Ev
iden
ceTe
am In
terv
iew
Scho
ol
Cri
teri
a8
Com
peti
tion
Cla
ss
Low
Dev
elop
ing
Adv
ance
dSc
ore
Cri
teri
a0
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
/10
8.1
Vehi
cle
Dis
play
Little
cons
iderat
ion gi
ven t
o veh
icle
repres
entat
ionSo
me at
tempt
to rep
resen
t veh
icle as
key
featur
eEx
celle
nt de
sign m
ateria
ls an
d meth
ods u
sed t
o disp
lay th
e veh
icle a
nd its
key
comp
onen
ts to
make
it a f
eatur
e of th
e disp
lay.
/5
8.2
Info
rmat
ion
Des
ign
Limite
d or r
epea
t of fo
lioPr
oject
mess
age i
s exp
ande
d bey
ond
folio
Cl
ean,
unclu
ttered
and w
ell or
ganis
ed la
yout
of wr
itten a
nd gr
aphic
al inf
ormati
on.
Conc
lusive
snap
shot
of tea
m's k
ey m
essa
ges.
/10
8.3
Use
of I
CTs
Limite
d ICT
sIC
Ts us
ed to
enha
nce p
resen
tation
.Ex
celle
nt int
egrat
ion of
mult
imed
ia tec
hnolo
gies a
nd in
terac
tive I
CTs t
o dem
onstr
ate,
enga
ge an
d info
rm.
/10
8.4
Visu
al D
esig
n &
Im
pact
Limite
d or lo
w im
pact
creati
vity,
brand
ing,
mess
aging
and r
ecog
nition
of sp
onso
rs.
Some
relev
ant c
reativ
e mes
sagin
g ev
ident
with
cons
iderat
ion fo
r a ra
nge
of fac
tors
Crea
tive d
esign
whic
h is a
ttracti
ve an
d imp
actfu
l. Exc
ellen
t repre
senta
tion o
f the t
eam
name
, bran
d and
bran
d colo
urs. T
eam
mess
age a
nd/or
slog
an is
clea
rly ev
ident
and
spon
sors
are ap
propri
ately
recog
nised
. Inno
vativ
e elem
ents
add i
nteres
t and
supp
ort
team
mess
aging
.
/10
8.5
Stru
ctur
al D
esig
n¹No
or lim
ited d
esign
deve
lopme
nt ev
ident,
no
r con
sidera
tion f
or co
nstra
ining
facto
rs.
Some
good
evide
nce o
f des
ign
deve
lopme
nt an
d con
sidera
tion f
or co
nstra
ining
facto
rs.
Crea
tive a
nd ju
stifie
d stru
ctural
desig
n with
exce
llent
use o
f spa
ce fo
r prim
ary di
splay
co
mpon
ents.
Evid
ence
of de
sign d
evelo
pmen
t con
sideri
ng fu
nctio
nality
at ev
ents,
bra
nding
and t
eam
mess
aging
, mate
rials,
budg
et, su
staina
bility
, tran
sport
and a
ssem
bly
cons
traint
s.
/15
8.6
Mat
eria
ls S
elec
tion
& U
se
No or
limite
d res
earch
into
mater
ials
with
cons
traini
ng fa
ctors
in mi
nd. S
ome
proble
ms ar
e evid
ent.
Gene
rally
effec
tive a
nd re
levan
t cho
ice
of ma
terial
s con
sideri
ng so
me fa
ctors
High
ly eff
ectiv
e cho
ice of
mate
rials.
Evid
ence
of de
velop
ment
cons
iderin
g fac
tors
includ
ing ap
peara
nce,
budg
et, su
staina
bility
, tran
sport
and a
ssem
bly co
nstra
ints.
Team
un
derst
ands
prop
erties
of m
ateria
ls us
ed an
d is a
ble to
justi
fy the
ir cho
ices,
achie
ving
an ex
celle
nt fin
ish w
ith ev
ident
atten
tion t
o deta
il.
/15
¹ Crite
ria no
t app
licab
le to
the D
evelo
pmen
t Clas
s at S
tate F
inals
Trad
e Disp
lay G
RAND
TOT
AL –
Deve
lopm
ent C
lass2
/50
² Po
ints a
pplic
able
to the
Dev
elopm
ent C
lass a
t Stat
e Fina
ls ON
LY Tr
ade D
isplay
GRA
ND T
OTAL
– Pr
ofes
siona
l Clas
s/65
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
54
of 6
0
C14
�15
CR
ITER
IA 9
– V
ERB
AL
PRES
ENTA
TIO
N: P
RES
ENTA
TIO
N T
ECH
NIQ
UE
SCO
RE
CA
RD
Judg
ing
Sub
Cat
egor
yPr
esen
tati
on T
echn
ique
Team
ID
Prim
ary
Evid
ence
Team
Pre
sent
atio
nTe
am N
ame
Seco
ndar
y Ev
iden
ceN
ilSc
hool
Cri
teri
a9
Com
peti
tion
Cla
ss
Low
Dev
elop
ing
Adv
ance
dSc
ore
Cri
teri
a0
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
/10
9.1
Pres
enta
tion
Ener
gyAr
tificia
l and
/or lo
w en
ergy
Spea
kers
gene
rally
enthu
siasti
c with
lively
de
livery
Pass
ionate
with
effec
tive a
nd ap
propri
ate le
vels
of liv
eline
ss/10
9.2
Team
Con
trib
utio
nMi
nimal
team
partic
ipatio
nGo
od co
ntribu
tions
from
most
team
memb
ersEx
celle
nt tea
m wo
rk wi
th all
mem
bers
partic
ipatin
g effe
ctive
ly/10
9.3
Visu
al A
ids
Little
use o
f aids
Some
aids
used
effec
tively
Well
prod
uced
, high
ly rel
evan
t and
integ
rated
aids
effec
tively
impro
ve
comm
unica
tion
/10
9.4
Aud
ienc
e En
gage
men
tMi
nimal
enga
geme
ntSo
me au
dienc
e con
necti
on at
times
Audie
nce f
ully e
ngag
ed an
d exc
ited t
hroug
hout
prese
ntatio
n/10
9.5
Art
icul
atio
nDi
fficult
to un
derst
and a
nd/or
hear
most
prese
nters
Incon
sisten
t spe
aking
abilit
y Ex
celle
nt art
iculat
ion, u
se of
lang
uage
and v
oice p
rojec
tion b
y all m
embe
rs thr
ough
out th
e ass
essm
ent.
/10
9.6
Stru
ctur
eNo
struc
ture p
resen
ted, d
ifficu
lt to
follow
.A b
asic
struc
ture /
outlin
e prov
ided a
nd co
uld be
fol
lowed
by au
dienc
eCl
ear p
resen
tation
outlin
e / ov
erview
. Exc
ellen
t con
necti
ons b
etwee
n top
ics an
d ea
sy fo
r aud
ience
to fo
llow
/10
9.7
Tim
ing
Too f
ast o
r ran
out o
f time
. Go
od tim
ing. B
alanc
ed to
pic de
pth an
d pac
e.Ra
n on t
ime o
r just
unde
r. Exc
ellen
t bala
nce o
f dep
th for
each
topic
./10
Tech
niqu
e GRA
ND T
OTAL
/70
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
55
of 6
0
C14
�16
CR
ITER
IA 1
0 –
VER
BA
L PR
ESEN
TATI
ON
: CO
NTE
NT
SCO
RE
CA
RD
Judg
ing
Sub
Cat
egor
yPr
esen
tati
on C
onte
ntTe
am ID
Prim
ary
Evid
ence
Team
Pre
sent
atio
nTe
am N
ame
Seco
ndar
y Ev
iden
ceN
ilSc
hool
Cri
teri
a10
Com
peti
tion
Cla
ss
Low
Dev
elop
ing
Adv
ance
dSc
ore
Cri
teri
a0
10
1 2
0 1
2 3
4 5
2 3
3 4
5 6
6 7
8 9
10 1
1 12
4 5
7 8
9 10
13 1
4 15
16
17 1
8 19
20
/5 /15
/20
10.1
Te
am o
bjec
tives
Limite
d stat
emen
t of o
bjecti
ves
Good
state
ment
of ob
jectiv
esEx
celle
nt sta
temen
t of o
bjecti
ves s
uppo
rted b
y sou
nd re
ason
ing/5
10.2
De
scrip
tion
of V
ehicl
e Pro
duct
Basic
desc
riptio
nsGo
od de
scrip
tion o
f com
pone
nts an
d fea
tures
.Ex
celle
nt de
scrip
tion o
f com
pone
nts an
d fea
tures
inclu
ding
desig
n dec
ision
s./5
10.3
In
nova
tion
Little
inno
vatio
n pres
ented
Innov
ation
s des
cribe
d and
justi
fied
Origi
nality
. Clev
er inn
ovati
ons w
ith hi
gh po
sitive
proje
ct im
pact
/1510
.4
Refin
ement
Little
refin
emen
t pres
ented
Refin
emen
t des
cribe
d and
justi
fied
Clev
er refi
neme
nt wi
th hig
h pos
itive p
rojec
t impa
ct/15
10.5
Co
llabo
ratio
nLit
tle co
llabo
ration
disc
usse
dLin
ks w
ith in
dustr
y or h
igher
educ
ation
desc
ribed
Colla
borat
ions j
ustifi
ed w
ith lin
ks to
learn
ing an
d proj
ect o
utcom
es/20
10.6
Le
arni
ng o
utco
mes
No re
al refl
ectio
ns di
scus
sed
Good
expla
natio
n of s
ome l
earni
ng ou
tcome
sA r
ange
of pe
rsona
l, life
-long
learn
ing an
d care
er sk
ills ac
quire
d an
d ide
ntifie
d as p
rojec
t outc
omes
for a
rang
e of te
am m
embe
rs/15
10.7
Fu
ture
Car
eer A
spira
tions
&
Rese
arch
Little
or no
thou
ght h
ad be
en gi
ven t
o fut
ure ca
reer a
spira
tions
.
Evide
nce o
f som
e tea
m me
mbers
rese
archin
g care
ers
gene
rally
but n
o link
age t
o opp
ortun
ities i
n Defe
nce o
r De
fence
Indu
stries
.
It is e
viden
t that
team
memb
ers ha
d tho
ughtf
ully c
onsid
ered
their f
uture
caree
r asp
iratio
ns an
d und
ertak
en re
searc
h into
how
these
migh
t be l
inked
with
oppo
rtunit
ies be
ing of
fered
in D
efenc
e Ind
ustrie
s.
/15
10.8
Ov
erall
clar
itySe
veral
conc
epts
lacke
d clar
ificati
onCl
ear a
nd ap
propri
ate co
ncep
t exp
lanati
ons
Every
thing
pres
ented
was
unde
rstoo
d thro
ugh e
xcell
ent
expla
natio
ns/5
Cont
ent G
RAND
TOT
AL/95
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
56
of 6
0
C14
�17
CR
ITER
IA 1
1�1:
TR
AC
K A
SSES
SMEN
T –
SEC
TIO
N 1
SC
OR
E C
AR
D (S
AM
PLE
ON
LY)
JUD
GIN
G S
UB
CAT
EGO
RYTR
AC
K A
SSES
SMEN
TTE
AM
ID
SEC
TIO
N
1TE
AM
NA
ME
TIM
E LI
MIT
SCH
OO
L
CR
ITER
IA11
�1C
OM
PETI
TIO
N C
LASS
Elem
ent
Entr
y O
bsta
cle
Exit
Scor
e
1�
Varia
ble
Hill
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing
2……
….…
..…+1
2
= Fr
ont a
xle p
asse
s line
, +1
= ho
ld fo
r 3 se
cond
s 2
Reve
rse
back
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing
/7
2�
Up
Ram
p2
Pass
es th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t tou
ching
2
Pass
es th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t tou
ching
/4
3�
Wire
Brid
ge2
Pass
es th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t tou
ching
1…
……
.…..…
2 Co
ntro
l of v
ehicl
e on
brid
ge
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing
/6
4�
Dow
n R
amp
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing
2 Co
ntro
lled
desc
ent
(with
out fl
ipping
)
2……
….…
..….+
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing(+
2 =
both
gat
es)
/8
5�
Hub
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing
1……
….…
..…2…
….…
...…
..3
Cont
rol &
man
oeuv
rabil
ity o
f veh
icle
over
elem
ent
(1 =
2 w
heels
dro
pped
, 2 =
1 w
heel,
3 =
0 w
heels
)
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing
/7
6�
Pipe
Brid
ge2
Pass
es th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t tou
ching
1…
……
.…..…
2……
.…...
…..3
Co
ntro
l of v
ehicl
e on
brid
ge
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing
/7
Tim
e re
mai
ning
for s
tage
:
TRA
CK
SEC
TIO
N 1
TO
TAL
/39
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
57
of 6
0
C14
�18
CR
ITER
IA 1
1�3:
TR
AC
K A
SSES
SMEN
T –
SEC
TIO
N 2
SC
OR
E C
AR
D (S
AM
PLE
ON
LY)
JUD
GIN
G S
UB
CAT
EGO
RYTR
AC
K A
SSES
SMEN
TTE
AM
ID
SEC
TIO
N
2TE
AM
NA
ME
TIM
E LI
MIT
SCH
OO
L
CR
ITER
IA11
�2C
OM
PETI
TIO
N C
LASS
Elem
ent
Entr
y O
bsta
cle
Exit
Scor
e
7�
Low
Mu
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing
1……
….…
..…2
1 =
Cont
rol o
f veh
icle
over
elem
ent,
2 =
not t
ouch
ing ce
ntra
l pos
ts
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing
/6
8�
Side
Slo
pe
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing
1……
….…
..…+1
1
= Co
ntro
l of v
ehicl
e ov
er e
lemen
t, +1
= b
uzze
r/ligh
ts on
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing
/6
9�
‘V’
Gul
ly
Trav
erse
2
Pass
es th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t tou
ching
1
2 wh
eels
on e
ach
side
of ‘V
’ 2
Pass
es th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t tou
ching
/5
10�
Hill
Clim
b 2
Pass
es th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t tou
ching
1……
….…
..…2…
……
…..…
3.…
..…+1
Co
ntro
l of v
ehicl
e on
hill
asce
nt/ra
mp
over
/des
cent
(1
-3 fo
r con
trol, +
1 =
3 se
cond
hold
on
desc
ent)
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out t
ouch
ing/8
11�
Up
Ram
p 2
Pass
es th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t tou
ching
2
Pass
es th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t tou
ching
/4
Tim
e re
mai
ning
for s
tage
:
TRA
CK
SEC
TIO
N 2
TO
TAL
/29
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
58
of 6
0
C14
�19
CR
ITER
IA 1
1�3:
TR
AC
K A
SSES
SMEN
T –
SEC
TIO
N 3
SC
OR
E C
AR
D (S
AM
PLE
ON
LY)
JUD
GIN
G S
UB
CAT
EGO
RYTR
AC
K A
SSES
SMEN
TTE
AM
ID
SEC
TIO
N
3TE
AM
NA
ME
TIM
E LI
MIT
SCH
OO
L
CR
ITER
IA11
�3C
OM
PETI
TIO
N C
LASS
Elem
ent
Entr
y O
bsta
cle
Exit
Scor
e
12�
Cam
ber D
ome
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out to
uchin
g
1……
….…
..…2
Cont
rolle
d an
d ba
lance
d op
erat
ion o
f See
saw
(1 =
cont
rol, +
1 =
front
axle
ove
r line
for 3
seco
nd h
old)
2 Re
vers
e ba
ck th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t touc
hing
/6
13�
Sees
aw
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out to
uchin
g
1……
….…
..…+1
Cont
rolle
d an
d ba
lance
d op
erat
ion o
f See
saw
(1 =
cont
rol, +
1 =
front
axle
ove
r line
for 3
seco
nd h
old)
2 Re
vers
e ba
ck th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t touc
hing
/6
14�
Tunn
el2
Pass
es th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t touc
hing
1……
….…
..…+1
1 =
cont
rol o
f veh
icle
over
elem
ent, +
1 =
light
s com
e on
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out to
uchin
g /6
15�
Art
icul
atio
n 2
Pass
es th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t touc
hing
1……
….…
..…2
Cont
rol o
f veh
icle
over
elem
ent
(Stra
ight li
ne, n
o wh
eels
off/in
bet
ween
hum
ps)
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out to
uchin
g /6
16�
Roc
k C
raw
l 2
Pass
es th
roug
h co
nes w
ithou
t touc
hing
1……
….…
..…2…
……
.…..…
+2Co
ntro
l of v
ehicl
e ov
er e
lemen
t(1
-2 =
cont
rol, +
2 =
with
out to
uchin
g ba
rrier
s)
2 Pa
sses
thro
ugh
cone
s with
out to
uchin
g /8
Tim
e re
mai
ning
for s
tage
:
TRA
CK
SEC
TIO
N 3
TO
TAL
/32
2019
Lan
d Ro
ver 4
x4 in
Sch
ools
Aust
ralia
n Co
mpe
titio
n Re
gula
tions
Re-E
ngin
eerin
g Au
stra
lia L
td.
V1
.0 M
ay 2
019
Page
59
of 6
0
C14
�20
CR
ITER
IA 1
1�4:
TR
AIL
ER T
OW
– S
ECTI
ON
S 1-
4 SC
OR
E C
AR
D (S
AM
PLE
ON
LY)
JUD
GIN
G S
UB
CAT
EGO
RYTR
AIL
ER T
OW
TEA
M ID
SEC
TIO
N
1-4
TEA
M N
AM
E
TIM
E LI
MIT
SCH
OO
L
CR
ITER
IA11
�4C
OM
PETI
TIO
N C
LASS
Poin
ts
No�
of L
ine
Faul
ts(D
educ
t 1 p
oint
per
faul
t)N
o� o
f Cyl
inde
r Fau
lts(D
educ
t 2 p
oint
s pe
r fau
lt)N
o� o
f Ass
esso
r Int
erve
ntio
ns(D
educ
t 3 p
oint
s pe
r fau
lt)Sc
ore
Sect
ion
110
Sect
ion
210
Sect
ion
310
Sect
ion
410
Trai
ler T
ow T
otal
/40
2018 Levels 2, 3 & 4 Competition Regulations
1300 204 478www.rea.org.au
top related