Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts Vertical Articulation at a Glance 2.

Common Core State Standards in English Language Arts

Vertical Articulation at a Glance

2

Common Core State StandardsOur goals for today…

Participants will…

• Review their previous experiences with the CCSS• Deepen their understanding of the vertical

articulation of the standards• Deconstruct a standard and begin to evaluate its

rigor as defined by Hess’s Cognitive Rigor matrix• Consider implications for their work• Review resources and coming events

3

Current WA Standards (GLEs) – Grades K-10

Common Core ELA Standards – Grades K-12

4

Reading Writing

Communication

(includes Speaking and

Listening)

ELA Common Core Standards

Speaking and

Listening

Reading

Writing

Language

Media & Tech

5

• K-5 page 11

• Reading

• Foundational Skills

• Writing

• Speaking and

Listening

• Language

• 6-12 page 35

• Reading

• Writing

• Speaking and Listening

• Language

• Literacy in History/Social

Studies, Science, and

Technical Subjects

The ELA Document StructureIntroduction page 10

Appendices A, B, C

College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for ELA

6

College and Career Readiness (CCR) Standards – Overarching standards for each of four ELA strands that are further defined by grade-specific standards

• Reading - 10• Writing - 10• Speaking and

Listening - 6• Language - 6

What is Vertical ArticulationVertical alignment asks:

How are the content standards/objectives related from one year/grade to the next?

Knowledge or skills extend to a wider range of content

Deeper understanding of the (cognitive process) for same content

New content or skills

7

Example of Grade-Level Progression in Reading

CCSS Reading Standard 3: Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the course of a text.

8

Quality of Content Alignment Content standards are clearly articulated

across grades if: Related standards are clearly differentiated.

What new knowledge or skill is required?

Differences in terminology are explained. One or both standards may not be described in

sufficient detail.

Terminology Different words for the same skill? The meaning of terms appears to be expanded.

9

Bloom’s TaxonomyLabels the type of thinking (verbs) needed

to complete a task; tracing the verbs reveals a deepening of the cognitive processes through a standard from K-12.

10

This is important because…

Task Predicts Performance

TEACHER STUDENT

CONTENT

TASK

Elevate the cognitive

demand of the task, and you elevate the

performance.

Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy Taxonomy of cognitive objectives 1950s- developed by Benjamin Bloom Means of qualitatively expressing different kinds of

thinking Adapted for classroom use as a planning tool and

continues to be one of the most universally applied models

Provides a way to organize thinking skills into six levels, from the most basic to the higher order levels of thinking

1990s- Lorin Anderson (former student of Bloom) revisited the taxonomy, and as a result, a number of changes were made

(Pohl, 2000, Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn, pp. 7-8)

A Comparison Original Revised

Evaluation

Synthesis

Analysis

Application

Comprehension

Knowledge

Creating

Evaluating

Analyzing

Applying

Understanding

Remembering

(Based on Pohl, 2000, Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn, p. 8)

Bloom’s Taxonomy Levels

Cognitive process Verbs Associated with Level/Process

1. Remembering:Retrieving, recognizing, and recalling relevant knowledge from long-term memory

choose, define describe, find, identify, label, list, locate, match, name, recall, recite, recognize, record, relate, retrieve, say, select, show, sort, tell 

2. Understanding: Constructing meaning from oral, written, and graphic messages through interpreting, exemplifying, classifying, summarizing, inferring, comparing, and explaining.

categorize, clarify, classify, compare, conclude, construct, contrast, demonstrate, distinguish, explain, illustrate, interpret, match, paraphrase, predict, represent, reorganize, summarize, translate, understand 

3. Applying: Carrying out or using a procedure through executing, or implementing. 

apply, carry out, construct, develop, display, execute, illustrate, implement, model, solve, use

4. Analyzing: Breaking material into constituent parts, determining how the parts relate to one another and to an overall structure or purpose through differentiating, organizing, and attributing.

analyze, ascertain, attribute, connect, deconstruct, determine, differentiate, discriminate, dissect, distinguish, divide, examine, experiment, focus, infer, inspect, integrate, investigate, organize, outline, reduce, solve (a problem), test for 

5. Evaluating: Making judgments based on criteria and standards through checking and critiquing.

appraise, assess, award, check, conclude, convince, coordinate, criticize, critique, defend, detect, discriminate, evaluate, judge, justify, monitor, prioritize, rank, recommend, support, test, value 

6. Creating: Putting elements together to form a coherent or functional whole; reorganizing elements into a new pattern or structure through generating, planning, or producing. 

adapt, build, compose, construct, create, design, develop, elaborate, extend, formulate, generate, hypothesize, invent, make, modify, plan, produce, originate, refine, transform

14

Back-mapping the ELA CCSS Starting with college and career readiness

Standards for each grade level are identified

Working backward from grade 11-12 to 9-10 to 8 etc.

Establishes a clear, aligned K-12 pathway, linking elementary, middle, high school, and end-of-high school college and career readiness

15

Analyzing the Standards16

READING STANDARDS FOR LITERATURE Key Ideas and Details

College and Career Ready Anchor Standards #1: Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. Grade 11-12

Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text, including determining where the text leaves matters uncertain.

Grade 9-10 Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Grade 8 Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Grade 7

Cite several pieces of textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Grade 6 Cite textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text.

Grade 5

Quote accurately from a text when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences from the text.

Grade 4

Refer to details and examples in a text when explaining what the text says explicitly and when drawing inferences from the text.

Grade 3

Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding of a text, referring explicitly to the text as the basis for the answers.

Grade 2 Ask and answer such questions as who, what, where, when, why, and how to demonstrate understanding of key details in a text.

Grade 1

Ask and answer questions about key details in a text. Grade K

With prompting and support, ask and answer questions about key details in a text.

Your turn…

With a partner, choose a standard

Highlight the additions of the grade level standard as it progresses from Kindergarten toward College and Career Ready Anchor Standards (CCRS)

17

When you have finished:Using the standard you have highlighted.

Underline the key concepts important nouns or noun phrases

Circle the verbs describing skills required of students

18

Summary StatementExample: Anchor standard 1 is about argumentative

writing and the components needed in a logical argument.

It emphasizes: Writing sound arguments Sufficient supporting evidence Valid reasoning

The need to read critically Analysis of substantive topics/text

19

Cognitive Rigor Matrix by Karin Hess

Combines Bloom’s Taxonomy with Webb’s Depth of Knowledge framework.

A tool for: Designing units of study that have a range of

cognitive demand. Assessing tasks for the thinking they require of a

student

Depth + thinking

Level 1Recall & Reproduction

Level 2Skills & Concepts

Level 3Strategic Thinking/ Reasoning

Level 4Extended Thinking

Remember - Recall, locate basic facts, details, events

Understand - Select appropriate words to use when intended meaning is clearly evident

- Specify, explain relationships- summarize– identify main ideas

- Explain, generalize, or connect ideas using supporting evidence (quote, example…)

- Explain how concepts or ideas specifically relate to other content domains or concepts

Apply - Use language structure (pre/suffix) or word relationships (synonym/antonym) to determine meaning

– Use context to identify meaning of word- Obtain and interpret information using text features

- Use concepts to solve non-routine problems

- Devise an approach among many alternatives to research a novel problem

Analyze - Identify whether information is contained in a graph, table, etc.

– Compare literary elements, terms, facts, events– analyze format, organization, & text structures

- Analyze or interpret author’s craft (literary devices, viewpoint, or potential bias) to critique a text

– Analyze multiple sources- Analyze complex/abstract themes

Evaluate – Cite evidence and develop a logical argument for conjectures

- Evaluate relevancy, accuracy, & completeness of information

Create - Brainstorm ideas about a topic

- Generate conjectures based on observations or prior knowledge

- Synthesize information within one source or text

- Synthesize information across multiple sources or texts

The Cognitive Rigor Matrix

Nature Of Content AlignmentApplying Webb’s Alignment Constructs1. Categorical Concurrence

What content is new? What content is continued?

2. Range of ContentBroadening or generalizing knowledge/skills

3. Depth of Knowledge (DOK)Webb DOK ratings are somewhat grade-specific

4. Balance of RepresentationHow does content emphasis vary across grades?

5. Source of ChallengeWhat needs to be clarified about the standards?

22

Implications

What kinds of statements can you make regarding the vertical articulation of the standard you analyzed? Use the cognitive rigor matrix to assist you.

What are the similarities and differences in your current expectations for students with those of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)?

23

What instructional shifts do you see?

As a result of your work today, what specific impact will the Common Core State Standards have on your lesson planning, assessment and teaching practices?

In what ways will you shift your instruction as an individual, grade level, department, building or district.

24

What we have done today…

25

Standard to Practice Deconstructed

Identified the verbs Highlighted words/phrases

defined or interpreted Examined the vertical alignment and identified

the context Examined the horizontal alignment and identified

the context Determined whether one item/activity can

address the entire standard Described something in your curriculum that

aligned to the standard

26

Next steps?

27

Standard to Practice Begin with the Common Core State

Standards, then consider what you already have and do.

Determine whether you address: all or part of the standards in your curriculum, whether your practice occurs at the same

grade level as the standard, and whether you currently have any data to

evaluate effectiveness of instruction relative to that practice

28

Resources

29

See the Resource page for the link to these documents.

Grade Level One-Pagers created by teachers in

Washington State

30

Resources for Implementation ELA overview documents (one-pagers) as

connected with WA standards: http://k12.wa.us/CoreStandards/Transition.aspx#ELAGradeLevel

Publisher’s Criteria in ELA and Literacy: http://k12.wa.us/CoreStandards/Resources.aspx

Alignments cross-walk documents: http://k12.wa.us/CoreStandards/Transition.aspx#Analyses

Parent Resource Guides: http://www.pta.org/4446.htm

31

For More Information• Common Core Website:

http://www.corestandards.org/the-standards • Common Core Questions:

– Email: corestandards@k12.wa.us OR – Greta Bornemann, OSPI CCSS Project Director, E-

mail: Greta.Bornemann@k12.wa.us• Hunt Institute Videos

– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IGD9oLofks&feature=player_detailpage (overview)

– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jt_2jI010WU&feature=related (writing)

32

Thank you.

corestandards@k12.wa.us