COMET HYDROMET 99-2. Enhancements to PPS Build 10 (Nov. 1998) –Terrain Following Hybrid Scan –Graphical Hybrid Scan –Adaptable parameters appended to.

Post on 02-Jan-2016

214 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

Transcript

COMET HYDROMET 99-2

Enhancements to PPS• Build 10 (Nov. 1998)

– Terrain Following Hybrid Scan– Graphical Hybrid Scan– Adaptable parameters appended to DPA

• Open Systems RPG– Radar Echo Classifier– Range Correction– Mean Field Bias Correction

Radar Precipitation Estimation Stage II and III Processing

HDP4 km res.

Stage IIStage II

WHFS

Flash Flood Monitoring and Prediction

Stage III

WFO RFC

Rain gages

Stage II

• Processing for individual radars

• 4 km resolution on HRAP grid

• 131 x 131 array

Stage II

• Mean field bias adjustment

• multisensor gage/radar merging

• gage only analysis

Stage II processing

• Generally run once per hour at H+15 mins for each radar using hourly rainfall ending at H+00 min

• Updated every hour to incorporate late arriving gage data by (H+1:15,H+2:15 etc)

Automated QC of HDP Data

• Removal of HRAP bin data that are consistently bad (e.g. Mountain blockage or ground clutter contamination)

• Removal of bin data contaminated by anomolous propagation (AP) though use of GOES IR satellite and surface temperature data

• Removal of outlier bin data (R > threshold)

Mean Field Bias Adjustment

• Attempts to account for uniform errors over the entire field such as radar calibration, improper Z-R relationship

• Bias is a function of current and previous hours bias

• Memory span parameter indicates how many hours to look into the past when determining the current bias

Mean Field Bias Adjustment

B k* is the estimated bias for hour K

Z g(u i,k) is the i-th gage ra infa ll a t location u i a t hour j

Z r(u i,k) is the i-th radar ra infa ll a t loca tion u i a t hour j

N j is the number of radar-gage pa irs a t hour j

K is the current hour

L is the lag in hours

Single Optimal EstimationHRAP GRID

R0

R2

R3

R1R0 = “TRUE” value

P rob lem : E s tim ate R 0 (i .e . R e) Gi ven R 1,R 2,R 3

R 0 = f(R 1,R 2,R 3) = w 1R 1 + w 2R 2 + w 3R 3 = w i R i W h ere w i ’s are u n k n o w n

F ind W i ’ s so th a t

E [(R e-R O )2] V (m in i m ize th e erro r varian ce)

fo r i = 1 ,2 ,3

so l ve fo r w i ’s

d o fo r a ll H R A P G rid p oin ts

VW

i

0

R 0 = f(R 1,R 2,R 3) = w 1R 1 + w 2R 2 + w 3R 3 = w i R i

Stage II Multisensor Rainfall Field Generation

A

B

BIAS

1) Start with 1 hour radaraccumulations (HDP) which maycontain mean and local biases

2) Remove mean field bias

3) Merge Gage and Radar Observations

R = Bias*R

Re=w1G1 + w2G2 +w3G3+w4R

A

A

B

B

Cross Section

Cross Section

Stage II

Stage III

• Mosaics Stage II multisensor rainfall estimates on to larger HRAP grid

• Interactive Quality Control

• Can be used as main input into hydrologic models through (MAPX)

Stage III Mosaic

• In areas that where more than one radar overlaps forecaster has choice:– mean value of overlapping bins– maximum value of overlapping bins

• If multisensor field is not available for a given area, the gage only field is used

Stage III interactive features

• Display geographic overlays

• Time Lapse

• Zoom

• Display and Edit Gages

• Add pseudo gages

• Delete AP

• Re-run Stage II and re-mosaic

Important Adaptable Parameters

• Memory Span (1-1000)– controls responsiveness of bias adjustment

• Indicator Cross Correlation Coefficient (0-1)– controls how good radar verses gage is at

indicating where it is raining

• Conditional Cross Correlation Coefficient (0-1)– controls how good radar verses gage is at

indicating amount of rainfall

Case Study

• Site: ABRFC

• Study impact of varying adaptable parameters

• Vary ICC (0-1)

• Vary CCC(0-1)

• Compare with 24 hour co-op gages

• Compare forecast with observed hydrograph

WATTS RADAR ONLY WITH NO BIAS ADJUSTMENT

WATTS GAGE ONLY

WATTS RADAR ONLY WITH BIAS ADJUSTMENT

WATTS MULTISENSOR ESTIMATE

RFC-WIDE PPS

• Mosaic of data from lowest available height

• Radar Climatology used to define blocked areas

• Satellite and Model Data to delineate clear air AP

• No radar data taken from above freezing level used

• SOE to fill in missing areas using available gages and surrounding good radar data

• PRISM data used to scale estimates in missing areas

PBZ Total Rainfall Summer Months

Summer Coverage

PBZ Total Rainfall Winter Months

Winter coverage

FCX frequency of rainfall

FCX Coverage

top related