Transcript
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
1/150
1
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
2 FOR THE COUNTY OF MARION
3
4 ROBERT KILLGORE, )
)
5 Plaintiff, )
)
6 vs. ) Case No. 13C13825
)
7 STATE OF OREGON, DEPARTMENT )
OF CORRECTIONS, )
8 )
Defendant. )
9 ______________________________)
10
11
12
13 DEPOSITION OF COLETTE PETERS
14 Taken on behalf of Plaintiff
15 * * *
16 BE IT REMEMBERED THAT the deposition of
17 COLETTE PETERS was taken before KIM NERHEIM,
18 a Certified Shorthand Reporter for Oregon, on
19 Friday, September 20, 2013, commencing at the
20 hour of 12:57 p.m., in the offices of the Oregon
21 Department of Justice, 1162 Court Street NE,
22 Salem, Oregon.
23
24
25
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
2/150
2
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 APPEARANCES:
2
3 BUSSE & HUNT
BY MR. RICHARD C. BUSSE
4 621 S.W. Morrison Street, Suite 521
Portland, Oregon 97205
5 503-248-0504
rbusse@busseandhunt.com
6 Attorney for Plaintiff.
7
8 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
BY MR. STEVEN M. LIPPOLD
9 1162 Court Street NE
Salem, Oregon 97301
10 503-947-4700
steve.lippold@doj.state.or.us
11 Attorney for Defendant.
12
13 ALSO PRESENT: Robert Killgore
14 * * *
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
3/150
3
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 COLETTE PETERS
2 having first been sworn by the reporter,
3 testified under oath as follows:
4
5 EXAMINATION
6 BY MR. BUSSE:
12:57:38 7 Q Would you please state your full name for the record.
8 A Colette -- do I need to spell it? C-o-l-e-t-t-e.
9 Marie and Snyder are two of my middle names, and my last
10 name is Peters.
12:57:50 11 Q And your residence address, please?
12 A I would prefer to give you my business address.
13 MR. LIPPOLD: We'll do that off --
12:57:58 14 Q BY MR. BUSSE: I have to do it for subpoena purposes.
15 MR. LIPPOLD: Let's do this, Rich. I will,
16 on the record, declare that I will ensure her attendance
17 at anything, and if you need her I will get her.
18 MR. BUSSE: Well, the problem --
19 MR. LIPPOLD: There are security concerns of
20 her giving out her address, and, as a result --
21 MR. BUSSE: I have no problem with keeping
22 it confidential. But if somebody leaves, then you have no
23 longer any control, so...
24 MR. LIPPOLD: Let's go off the record, then?
25 MR. BUSSE: Yeah, that's fine.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
4/150
4
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 (A discussion was held off the record.)
12:59:36 2 Q BY MR. BUSSE: Ms. Peters, my name is Rich Busse.
3 I'm here to ask you questions in connection with the case
4 that Mr. Killgore filed against the State. If at any time
5 you don't understand my question, don't hesitate to ask me
6 to rephrase; I'd be happy to do that for you, okay?
7 A Okay.
12:59:49 8 Q Also, as you did, it's good to continue to get a good
9 strong verbal response, rather than a shake or nod of the
10 head or "uh-huh" or "huh-uh." Will you try and continue
11 to do that for us, please?
12 A Yes.
13:00:00 13 Q Where are you currently employed?
14 A The Oregon Department of Corrections.
13:00:02 15 Q In what capacity?
16 A As the director.
13:00:04 17 Q For how long have you been so employed?
18 A Since February of last year.
13:00:08 19 Q When in February?
20 A I believe my first date was February 6th, so on or
21 around February 6th.
13:00:16 22 Q What was your job before that?
23 A Director of the Oregon Youth Authority.
13:00:20 24 Q For how long?
25 A Since July of 2009.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
5/150
5
www.LNScourtreporting.com
13:00:26 1 Q And before that?
2 A Before that, I was a stay-at-home mom for
3 approximately six months.
13:00:34 4 Q And before that?
5 A Assistant Director and Inspector General at the
6 Department of Corrections.
13:00:46 7 Q For how long?
8 A I arrived at the Department of Corrections in April
9 of 2004 as the public affairs administrator and was
10 promoted to Assistant Director and Inspector General in
11 2006.
13:01:14 12 Q What did you do before that?
13 A I worked for the Colorado legislature.
13:01:18 14 Q In what capacity?
15 A As their nonpartisan criminal justice research staff,
16 focusing on criminal justice issues.
13:01:29 17 Q For how long?
18 A You're testing my memory. From, it would have been
19 December of 2003 back to the fall of 1998.
13:01:44 20 Q And before that?
21 A I worked for the Denver Police Department.
13:01:49 22 Q In what capacity?
23 A As -- I ran the crisis mediation unit inside the
24 Crimes Against Persons Bureau.
13:01:57 25 Q How long?
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
6/150
6
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 A From the fall of 1995 until I began working for the
2 Colorado legislature in '98.
13:02:04 3 Q And before that?
4 A Before that, I worked for Breck Preparatory School in
5 Minneapolis, Minnesota.
13:02:19 6 Q In what capacity?
7 A An assistant to the principal.
13:02:31 8 Q What year are we back to?
9 A That was the summer of 1995.
13:02:35 10 Q What's your age?
11 A 42.
13:02:37 12 Q And date of birth?
13 A 1/1/71.
13:02:40 14 Q What's your education?
15 A I have a Master's degree in criminal justice and a
16 Bachelor's degree in psychology.
13:02:49 17 Q Where did you get your Master's?
18 A The University of Colorado.
13:02:52 19 Q What year?
20 A Let's see, I graduated in 1998.
13:03:07 21 Q And your Bachelor's, where?
22 A The College of Saint Benedict in Saint Joseph,
23 Minnesota.
13:03:12 24 Q What year?
25 A 1993.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
7/150
7
www.LNScourtreporting.com
13:03:19 1 Q Who do you report to?
2 A The governor.
13:03:28 3 Q And does Mr. Morrow report to you?
4 A He does.
13:03:34 5 Q What are your job duties?
6 A To oversee the Oregon Department of Corrections,
7 which is responsible for 4300 employees, approximately
8 14,500 inmates inside our prisons, and either indirect or
9 direct responsibility over approximately 31,000 felons on
10 supervision in the community.
13:03:56 11 Q And is it part of your job to see to it that the
12 department operates within the law?
13 A It is.
13:04:06 14 Q And were you aware, upon your appointment as
15 Director, that the Oregon Constitution provides that all
16 income generated from prison work programs were to be kept
17 separate from General Fund accounts?
18 A I am.
13:04:17 19 Q And were you also aware that those monies were only
20 to be used for implementing, maintaining, and developing
21 prison work programs?
22 A Yes.
13:04:34 23 Q Is it the policy of the department to treat its
24 employees fairly and in good faith?
25 A It is.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
8/150
8
www.LNScourtreporting.com
13:04:40 1 Q And to give them notice of any perceived deficiencies
2 so that they have a fair opportunity to correct them?
3 A It is.
13:04:48 4 Q And in the event of employee misconduct, to withhold
5 judgment until an investigation of that is complete?
6 A Can you be more clear around "investigation"?
13:05:00 7 Q Is it your policy that if some employee misconduct is
8 brought to your attention that you don't just jump to a
9 conclusion about it, you first conduct a full and fair
10 investigation?
11 A That is correct.
13:05:12 12 Q And as part of completing the investigation, before
13 you arrive at a judgment, to get both sides to the story?
14 A Yes.
13:05:24 15 Q Do you ever discipline subordinates?
16 A Yes.
13:05:32 17 Q What factors do you take into account in determining
18 whether and how much to discipline?
19 A It depends on each individual case. I definitely
20 focus on the individual that's sitting before me and try
21 to gather as many facts about the situation as possible
22 before garnering any decision.
13:05:47 23 Q Would you consider such factors as the seriousness of
24 the offense?
25 A Yes, no doubt.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
9/150
9
www.LNScourtreporting.com
13:05:52 1 Q And whether it's a repeat offense?
2 A Yes.
13:05:55 3 Q And whether the standard of behavior is clearly
4 communicated?
5 A Yes.
13:05:59 6 Q And whether the standard is understood by the person?
7 A Yes.
13:06:03 8 Q And that person's overall performance history?
9 A Yes. It -- yes, in most cases, if I might clarify.
10 Should someone have clear conduct for years and engage in
11 unethical or criminal behavior, I don't believe that the
12 past -- or at least the past experience wouldn't weigh as
13 highly for me.
13:06:24 14 Q Have you disciplined any subordinates other than
15 Mr. Killgore in the last year?
16 A For clarification, directly as the director, or
17 within the organization have employees been disciplined?
13:06:43 18 Q Directly as the director.
19 A No.
13:06:47 20 Q Have you terminated any directly as the director?
21 A No.
13:06:51 22 Q In any previous capacity with the State, have you
23 disciplined or terminated employees?
24 A Yes.
13:06:57 25 Q And are the forms of discipline that you can advert
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
10/150
10
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 to, do they include such things as verbal warnings?
2 A Yes.
13:07:07 3 Q And written warnings?
4 A Yes.
13:07:09 5 Q And if someone has a performance issue, can you put
6 them on a plan of assistance to help improve their
7 performance?
8 A That is an option.
13:07:18 9 Q And if you give somebody a work plan to try and
10 improve their performance, is the plan itself to be
11 realistic and attainable?
12 A Yes.
13:07:29 13 Q Now, are you the person who decided to fire
14 Mr. Killgore?
15 A I am the person that decided to end the employment
16 relationship with Mr. Killgore.
13:07:38 17 Q And was that your decision to make?
18 A Yes.
13:07:42 19 Q Did anyone provide any input into that decision?
20 A Yes.
13:07:47 21 Q And who was that?
22 A I don't know that I would be able to recall everyone
23 complete -- you know, an entire -- a complete list, but I
24 never make decisions like that in a vacuum, I know that I
25 consulted with members of the policy group, I consulted
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
11/150
11
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 with DOJ lawyers and, again, as I said earlier in
2 your earlier questioning, really tried to gather as much
3 information as possible before making that decision.
13:08:16 4 Q And when was that decision made?
5 A I believe it was March of -- I believe it was March.
13:08:28 6 Q And was that early, mid, or late March?
7 A I believe it was mid-March.
13:08:39 8 Q How many days or weeks prior to the termination being
9 effected was it that that decision was reached?
10 A I don't recall.
13:08:45 11 Q And prior to reaching the decision, when were your
12 consultations with members of your policy group?
13 A During my decision making, but the exact dates I do
14 not remember.
13:08:58 15 Q Would that have also been in that early March period?
16 A Again, I don't remember the exact date.
13:09:07 17 Q Over -- Of course. Over what period of time did
18 those consultations extend?
19 A You know, again, if you're looking for a range, I
20 would say weeks prior to the decision.
13:09:27 21 Q Okay. Who do you recall speaking with on the policy
22 group about that?
23 A I recall speaking to Chane Griggs, Michael Gower,
24 Leonard Williamson. I think that was the -- the only
25 policy group members that I recall speaking to about this
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
12/150
12
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 decision.
13:10:03 2 Q And who were the policy group members at that time
3 besides those three?
4 A Again, I would have to go back and look in March. We
5 have had some changes, and I'm not remembering when people
6 came and went.
13:10:19 7 Q Is there a document that would tell us who those
8 persons were?
9 A Sure.
13:10:23 10 Q And what would that document be called?
11 A Well, it would be our organizational chart at that
12 time.
13 MR. BUSSE: Would you make a note to me to
14 request to have produced the organizational chart of the
15 DOC policy group as of March 2013.
13:10:43 16 Q BY MR. BUSSE: And so what did you and Chane Griggs
17 discuss on that subject?
18 A I don't remember the specifics of the conversation.
19 I will tell you that these decisions I do not take
20 lightly; I labor over them, I lose sleep over them. And
21 so the conversations that I had would have been around
22 past performance, direction that we're trying to take the
23 agency, and for me it's -- I always err on the side of
24 helping make the person succeed and trying to figure out
25 if we had crossed a line where that success just couldn't
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
13/150
13
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 occur.
13:11:20 2 Q Did you approach Chane Griggs, or did he approach
3 you?
4 A Chane Griggs is a woman. And I approached her.
13:11:25 5 Q Oh, thank you.
6 And do you recall if that was the first person
7 you spoke with or the last, or which in order?
8 A I do not recall.
13:11:34 9 Q And what is her job title?
10 A She was the assistant director responsible for the
11 offender management and rehabilitation division.
13:11:42 12 Q And for what purpose were you discussing the subject
13 with her?
14 A As a member of my executive team.
13:11:48 15 Q Was there something about what she did in her role as
16 assistant director that gave her special knowledge about
17 the subject?
18 A Can you be more clear? Special knowledge about
19 Oregon Corrections Enterprise or around leadership for the
20 agency?
13:12:07 21 Q Why her as opposed to some other member of the policy
22 group that you did not speak with?
23 A I think for me, the re -- the reasons I would be
24 drawn to those three in engaging in a conversation like
25 this is relying on their sense of leadership, their
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
14/150
14
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 seniority in the agency, and simply from that perspective.
13:12:40 2 Q How long was your conversation with Chane Griggs?
3 A I don't know -- I wouldn't say it was a single
4 conversation, I think it was an ongoing conversation over
5 time as I deliberated.
13:12:55 6 Q The ongoing conversation involved how many contacts?
7 A I do not recall.
13:13:00 8 Q What's your best estimate?
9 A Six conversations, perhaps.
13:13:13 10 Q All right. Do you recall anything that you said to
11 her or she said to you in the first of the six?
12 A No, nothing particular.
13:13:23 13 Q The second?
14 A No. I won't recall -- I'm not recalling specifics of
15 any of those conversations.
13:13:33 16 Q Do you recall the substance of any piece of
17 information that she provided or piece of advice?
18 A I don't remember specifics. One of the things that
19 she does well is probe and just ask questions and to make
20 sure that I'm not missing anything and I've taken
21 everything into account, but I don't remember specifics.
13:14:01 22 Q Do you remember the substance of any information you
23 gave to her during any of those six conversations about
24 that subject?
25 A No, I don't -- you know, I don't recall specifically.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
15/150
15
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 Generally, what I would do in those conversations is
2 really share the information I know around performance and
3 where we're -- where I'm wanting to go from a vision
4 perspective.
13:14:25 5 Q Did you discuss options to termination with her
6 during any of those six conversations?
7 A And can you be more clear? You mean options other
8 than termination?
13:14:37 9 Q Right. Did you discuss an array of options in
10 dealing with the issue?
11 A I don't know that I talked about a range of options
12 with either of those three individuals. I would -- I'm
13 confident that I talked about all of the conversations I
14 had had with Rob over the year trying to get him to
15 perform at the level that I needed him to perform at.
13:15:17 16 Q Was there a conversation with Mr. Killgore during
17 2012 in which you told him he was not performing up to
18 standard?
19 A Yes, there were multiple conversations.
13:15:30 20 Q And when was the first?
21 A Shortly after my arrival at DOC.
13:15:38 22 Q What did you say to him to convey that he was not
23 performing --
24 A We --
13:15:42 25 Q -- up to standards -- May I finish?
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
16/150
16
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 A Pardon me.
13:15:43 2 Q Thank you. She can only take down one of us at a
3 time, so I'll try not to step on your response, if you try
4 to withhold your response before I complete my question.
5 A Of course.
13:15:55 6 Q What is the first conversation that you can recall
7 having with Mr. Killgore at which you stated to him that
8 you did not believe his performance was up to standard?
9 MR. LIPPOLD: Object to the form of the
10 question, vague. Go ahead.
11 A I remember having conversations with Mr. Killgore
12 around the CAFR issue early on in my tenure at the
13 Department of Corrections and struggling to find clarity
14 on what his recommendation was in moving forward.
13:16:23 15 Q BY MR. BUSSE: In the conversation on the CAFR
16 issue -- And that was in about July? August?
17 A February.
13:16:31 18 Q February, okay.
19 Tell me the substance of your conversation
20 with Mr. Killgore on the CAFR issue in February and how
21 you communicated to him that you believed his performance
22 to be substandard.
23 A Again, I don't remember specifics, but I remember
24 generally having conversations and e-mails with
25 Mr. Killgore on how to manage the CAFR conversation with
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
17/150
17
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 him.
13:16:57 2 Q Did you tell him, "Rob, I believe your performance is
3 substandard"?
4 A No, I never used those words.
13:17:07 5 Q Okay. How did you -- what words did you use to
6 communicate in 2012 at any time that you believed his
7 performance to be substandard?
8 A Again, I don't recall specific words, I just remember
9 having multiple conversations with Rob around vision and
10 where we wanted to go and the direction that we wanted to
11 take Oregon Corrections Enterprise in and then having to
12 have conversations later because I noted he headed in a
13 different direction.
13:17:32 14 Q Well, you said that "I had conversations with him in
15 which I conveyed that he was not performing up to
16 standard," and I am entitled to find out when you said
17 that to him. Did you ever say that to him?
18 A I never used those words.
13:17:48 19 Q Did you use words like that?
20 A Yes.
13:17:50 21 Q What words like that did you use?
22 A Again, I don't recall the specific words.
13:17:55 23 Q Is it your practice, where you have a performer who
24 is substandard and won't comply with your direction, to
25 note that somewhere?
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
18/150
18
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 A Um, at the executive level, it typically isn't my
2 practice; however, in this case, many of the conversations
3 that we had with Mr. Killgore actually were with the
4 deputy director and myself, and the deputy was good at
5 capturing the conversations that happened and -- and send
6 them, then, to Rob in e-mail following many of our
7 meetings.
13:18:37 8 Q Did you discipline him before his termination?
9 A No.
13:18:40 10 Q Verbally or in writing?
11 A So I had multiple conversations with Mr. Killgore
12 around him not taking the organization in the direction
13 that I wanted. Was it formal discipline? No.
13:18:57 14 Q Did you confer with -- Who is your HR liaison?
15 A Um, at the time, the HR liaison was -- Sadly, I'm
16 drawing a blank. At the time, the HR liaison was --
13:19:27 17 Q He can't help you.
18 A I know.
13:19:29 19 Q You're looking at Mr. Lippold here.
20 Maybe that --
21 A Thank you.
13:19:36 22 Q Maybe it will come to you.
23 A Assistant Director Gary Sims.
13:19:41 24 Q Did you ever talk with Mr. Sims about a performance
25 problem that you were having with Mr. Killgore?
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
19/150
19
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 A I did not.
13:19:49 2 Q Why not?
3 A The -- the HR function at OCE is separate than with
4 DOC, so I relied on the individuals that I presented and
5 DOJ to help me work through the HR issues.
13:20:08 6 Q Have you ever consulted with Mr. Sims on HR issues?
7 A In his capacity as Assistant Director of HR, I'm sure
8 I did on some employee issues. It would be more likely,
9 however, that Mr. Sims would be briefing me on employee
10 issues in that capacity.
13:20:31 11 Q Mr. Gower, what is his job title?
12 A He's the assistant director responsible for
13 operations.
13:20:37 14 Q Now, did you have one conversation or more than one
15 conversation to discuss Mr. Killgore's performance issues
16 before his termination?
17 MR. LIPPOLD: Objection, vague. Go ahead.
18 A For clarification, with Mr. Gower?
13:20:53 19 Q BY MR. BUSSE: Yes.
20 A I did have multiple conversations with Mr. Gower; how
21 many, I do not know.
13:21:00 22 Q All right. Do you recall approximately how many?
23 A I'll do the same approximation for him, it was
24 probably around six.
13:21:07 25 Q And do you recall anything that you said to Mr. Gower
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
20/150
20
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 in any of those conversations about the performance issues
2 you were observing?
3 A Again, no, no specifics.
13:21:20 4 Q Do you recall anything that Mr. Gower said in
5 substance at any of those six conversations?
6 A No, I don't recall any specifics.
13:21:28 7 Q How about Mr. Williamson? How many times did you
8 speak with him about Mr. Killgore's performance issues?
9 A Mr. Williamson, I consulted probably more than six.
10 I probably consulted with him a dozen times --
13:21:44 11 Q All right.
12 A -- in his role as Inspector General.
13:21:50 13 Q And tell me about the inspector general in the DOC.
14 What role does the inspector general have, if any, with
15 respect to personnel issues?
16 A He is responsible for investigating all criminal or
17 unethical behavior of any of the employees in the
18 department. He is also our liaison to the Department of
19 Justice, and that would have been why I consulted with him
20 more in this particular case.
13:22:23 21 Q Well, liaison to the Department of Justice with
22 regard to personnel issues?
23 A Yes.
13:22:28 24 Q Okay.
25 A And inmate -- pardon me. And inmate litigation.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
21/150
21
www.LNScourtreporting.com
13:22:35 1 Q Did you consult with Mr. Williamson in writing or
2 verbally?
3 A Verbally.
13:22:49 4 Q And can you remember anything that you said to
5 Mr. Williamson in any of the 12 meetings that you estimate
6 you had with him on that subject?
7 A No, nothing specific, but would have ranged from not
8 only the conversations like I had with Ms. Griggs talking
9 about performance and past history, but he also helped me,
10 as liaison with DOJ, to figure out what our options were.
13:23:17 11 Q Do you recall anything that he said to you in terms
12 of those options?
13 MR. LIPPOLD: Object to the form of the
14 question, may call for attorney/client privilege. Can I
15 take a break to consult with my client to know what advice
16 she's talking about so it's not a waiver of
17 attorney/client privilege?
18 MR. BUSSE: I think you can ask her on the
19 record what the context was of the consultation, and I
20 would have no objection to you doing that.
21 MR. LIPPOLD: Okay. At this time?
22 Okay, Ms. Peters, you had been asked a
23 question about consultation you had had with Leonard
24 Williamson. You prefaced that by indicating that he was a
25 liaison with the DOJ. Mr. Busse had asked you a question
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
22/150
22
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 about what options he provided to you after he had
2 consulted with DOJ.
3 MR. BUSSE: I'm not sure that that was --
4 MR. LIPPOLD: That was what I heard.
5 MR. BUSSE: Okay.
6 MR. LIPPOLD: Do you wish me to continue, or
7 do you have a different question?
8 MR. BUSSE: You can go ahead and ask your
9 question, and then I may have further questions.
10 MR. LIPPOLD: And did Mr. Williamson
11 indicate to you whether any of these options were provided
12 to him through counsel with DOJ?
13 THE WITNESS: Yes, they were provided
14 through counsel with DOJ.
15 MR. LIPPOLD: So I'm going to object to the
16 asking of the questions further. I do not want this to be
17 a waiver of any attorney/client privilege.
13:25:05 18 Q BY MR. BUSSE: Ms. Peters, as the inspector general,
19 were you looking to Mr. Williamson for legal advice, or
20 no?
21 A No. I was looking to DOJ for legal advice.
13:25:25 22 Q Oh, okay.
23 MR. BUSSE: So I believe, under those
24 circumstances, then, what Mr. Williamson said to this
25 witness is not privileged and, therefore -- and to the
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
23/150
23
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 extent that there were those conversations between those
2 two individuals, neither of whom can claim the privilege,
3 then I must insist on a response about the options that
4 he, Mr. Williamson, told you were available to you.
5 MR. LIPPOLD: And I further object, I
6 disagree with your analysis. I believe that if the advice
7 was given to DOJ -- by DOJ, the attorney, to
8 Mr. Williamson at the request of the director, that his
9 then briefing her on the DOJ information would still be
10 privileged, and I'm going to instruct the witness not to
11 answer that question. We'll leave the deposition open for
12 interpretation by the Court.
13:26:29 13 Q BY MR. BUSSE: With regard to Mr. Williamson, Counsel
14 indicated that he was telling you what the Department of
15 Justice was telling him. Did you have conversations in
16 which Mr. Williamson was providing you with an array of
17 options before that consultation?
18 A To be clear, you're asking before the DOJ
19 consultation?
13:26:49 20 Q Right. Right.
21 A No, I do not recall he offered any suggestions or
22 alternatives prior to that consultation regarding options.
13:27:04 23 Q So in the 12 conversations you had, did he just go to
24 the DOJ after the first conversation, or when in that
25 interlude of conversations did that consultation occur?
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
24/150
24
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 A I don't recall.
13:27:20 2 Q Before that consultation occurred, were there some
3 conversations, at least, that you had had with
4 Mr. Williamson?
5 A Yes.
13:27:27 6 Q And in any of those conversations, can you tell me
7 what he told you about your -- the things that you could
8 do to remedy the issue?
9 A I don't recall any specifics.
13:27:40 10 Q Do you recall anything that you told him in any of
11 those conversations before he went to the Department of
12 Justice?
13 A Again, not any specifics, but it is likely the
14 conversations were very similar to the ones I had with
15 Ms. Griggs and Mr. Gower where I talked about the issues
16 as I saw them over the year and deliberated with them.
13:28:08 17 Q There's a newspaper report, I'm going to show you an
18 exhibit --
19 MR. BUSSE: Counsel, you already have the
20 copy of it.
21 MR. LIPPOLD: Yeah, it was the last one, I
22 think. Exhibit 131? Yes.
13:28:31 23 Q BY MR. BUSSE: And there's a newspaper report by the
24 Statesman Journal. And do you have that document in front
25 of you?
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
25/150
25
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 A I do.
13:28:59 2 Q If you'll turn to Page 3.
3 A (Complied.)
13:29:08 4 Q The newspaper article reports that in -- on
5 Paragraph 4, that "Peters also insisted on October 26th
6 that she had no plans to fire Killgore." Is that true?
7 A That is true.
13:29:23 8 Q And then two paragraphs down, it's reported that you
9 said, "Quite the opposite, in fact; that's not the path we
10 want to go down, we want to make him a success." Was that
11 true?
12 A That is correct.
13:29:37 13 Q And then it goes further and says, "...but we want to
14 continue the conversation where we left it, which is 'you
15 understand you're not meeting our expectations." Do you
16 see that?
17 A I do.
13:29:51 18 Q Did you say that to him at any time during 2012?
19 A I don't recall that I used those words specifically,
20 but I know that I had conversations around him not meeting
21 my expectations.
13:30:03 22 Q When you say "around not meeting our...," did you
23 ever indicate to him that he was not performing up to the
24 level of performance that you expected in an OCE director?
25 A Yes.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
26/150
26
www.LNScourtreporting.com
13:30:16 1 Q When did you say anything like that to him?
2 A We had multiple conversations around where I wanted
3 the Oregon Corrections Enterprise to go; that I want it to
4 remain a semi-independent agency; that I wanted to come up
5 with a business plan that would not just hire over a
6 thousand inmates but potentially 10,000 and that the --
7 the planning that he was taking in was actually not in
8 line with that direction.
13:30:52 9 Q Apart from giving feedback about his planning being
10 in the direction, did you ever give him an evaluation
11 during that year concerning his performance?
12 MR. LIPPOLD: Object to the form of the
13 question. Go ahead.
14 A I did not give Mr. Killgore a formal performance
15 evaluation during that year.
13:31:13 16 Q BY MR. BUSSE: Well, informally, did you say, "Based
17 upon what you're doing, you're just not cuttin' it," or
18 anything like that?
19 MR. LIPPOLD: Object to the form of the
20 question, vague. Go ahead.
21 A No, I never said "you're not cutting it." What I did
22 was talk about my frustration around him not seeming to
23 align with the vision of where I wanted Oregon Corrections
24 Enterprise to go.
13:31:37 25 Q BY MR. BUSSE: When did you say that you were
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
27/150
27
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 frustrated about that?
2 A You know, I think I probably began to get frustrated
3 in the summer of 2012/early fall where it seemed that I
4 would get him to a place of understanding and then the
5 very next meeting we would have he would be back in a
6 different place.
13:32:00 7 Q And that was pertaining to what issue in particular?
8 A Um, um, I would say multiple issues. Some of his
9 concerns around past spending; we would, as an example,
10 talk about his concerns around OCE paying for the funeral
11 of Officer Buddy Herron and -- or for parts of the funeral
12 of Officer Buddy Herron and we would have what I thought
13 would be a healthy conversation around my thinking and how
14 it was something that was appropriate and was something
15 that was valued, and he would then agree to that and say,
16 "You're right, I understand your logic, that makes
17 complete sense," and then I would meet with him again and
18 he would go back to, "I have concerns about that
19 particular event."
13:32:53 20 Q And that --
21 A But --
13:32:56 22 Q Excuse me, go ahead.
23 A And that's just one example of feeling like I was
24 getting him heading in a direction and focusing on the
25 future and then, at the very next meeting, he would turn
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
28/150
28
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 to the past again, either with that situation or another
2 situation I hadn't heard of that was concerning to him, as
3 well.
13:33:14 4 Q And that was frustrating to you.
5 A You know, for me -- and I think I wrote it in an
6 e-mail to him in August. For me, if there's something
7 that's not right in the organization, if there's something
8 we're not doing correctly, I want to know about it and
9 then I want to solve it and move on. And so that was the
10 conversation I had with Rob, which was, "Please, all of
11 your concerns that you have over the last ten years,
12 please put them together, we will go through them, we will
13 either refer them to the inspector general, the State
14 Police, HR, whomever needs to review them and we'll
15 resolve them and hold people accountable if need be, and
16 then I really need you to focus on the future, I really
17 want to figure out how we can take Oregon Corrections
18 Enterprise to the next level."
13:34:01 19 Q My question was, what you described using the Buddy
20 Herron funeral position, that that was frustrating to you,
21 his vacillation on that; is that correct?
22 A His vacillation generally. That was just one example
23 of where he vacillated.
13:34:20 24 Q And that caused frustration to you; correct?
25 A Correct.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
29/150
29
www.LNScourtreporting.com
13:34:23 1 Q Thank you.
2 And you said, you just got through saying
3 that, "Hey, I told him to, you know, write a list of what
4 his concerns were, we will refer them to the State Police,
5 whomever." Where did you ever tell him where you'd --
6 what you would do with the list?
7 A Um, I don't recall if it was specifically in the
8 e-mail that I wrote, but I know we at least talked about
9 that.
13:34:46 10 Q Tell me what you said.
11 A I don't remember specifically. But typically, when
12 people bring cases forward, we have different avenues,
13 depending on what the allegations are. So it might be an
14 appropriate Inspector General review, Oregon State Police
15 review, HR review; it would depend on the particular
16 issue. But I know I communicated to him that we would
17 look at everything he was concerned about and have it
18 appropriately investigated.
13:35:59 19 Q Why was Mr. Killgore terminated?
20 A For a variety of reasons. Primarily, because he was
21 not in line with the vision of where I wanted to take the
22 agency, but, also, we had begun hearing concerns around a
23 hostile work environment, and that was part of my decision
24 making, as well.
13:36:25 25 Q Anything else?
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
30/150
30
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 A You know, for me, it really was a determination
2 around if I thought he was the individual to take the
3 organization to the place that was in line with my vision.
13:36:55 4 Q The first item you mentioned.
5 A M-hm.
13:36:57 6 Q That's a "yes"?
7 A Yes.
13:37:03 8 Q And he was not in line with that vision in what
9 respect?
10 A So I had continually asked him to come up with a
11 business case plan that would take the organization from
12 employing approximately 1100 inmates to -- you know, I
13 would often say "10,000" if it was possible, clearly
14 recognizing that we still need inmates to do other work
15 inside our prisons, but wanting really to take an
16 organization that had been financially afloat now for over
17 a decade and figuring out how to expand its operations.
18 He seemed very set on figuring out how to move
19 the Oregon Corrections Enterprise outside of the purview
20 of the Department of Corrections, and that was a model
21 that had occurred years ago; the agency almost went
22 bankrupt when it happened. And with my background and
23 understanding of how intimately those two organizations
24 need to work together, I knew that that was a flawed
25 model, and I said to him time and time again that I was
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
31/150
31
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 not interested in pursuing even that conversation.
13:38:16 2 Q Anything else?
3 A Not that I can recall.
4 MR. LIPPOLD: Just a moment.
5 (Counsel conferred with the witness.)
6 THE WITNESS: Yes. Okay.
7 A So, for the record, many of my reasons were laid out
8 in the termination letter.
13:38:57 9 Q BY MR. BUSSE: Can you think of anything else?
10 A Not at this time.
13:39:03 11 Q Were there any reasons that were not laid out in the
12 termination letter?
13 A Again, I haven't reviewed the termination letter in
14 quite some time, but I do know that I would have laid all
15 of the facts before me before making the -- making the
16 decision. And all of that would have been way more fresh
17 back in March.
13:39:28 18 Q When you say lay the facts before you, did you have
19 any documents that you reviewed?
20 A I know I would have reviewed prior e-mail
21 communications between Mr. Killgore and myself.
13:39:40 22 Q Do you recall which ones?
23 A It would be my practice to review all of them, if not
24 nearly all of them.
13:39:53 25 Q Anything else?
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
32/150
32
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 A Not that I can recall.
13:40:11 2 Q And what was his position on how many inmates OCE
3 should employ?
4 MR. LIPPOLD: Object to the form of the
5 question, calls for speculation. Go ahead.
6 A I don't know that Mr. Killgore ever gave me an
7 estimate.
13:40:36 8 Q BY MR. BUSSE: Was there discussion with you about
9 expansion?
10 A Yes, we had multiple conversations around expansion.
13:40:43 11 Q Did you ever convey to him that those ideas of his on
12 the subject of expansion of the number of inmates in the
13 program were unsatisfactory?
14 A It was my hope -- Excuse me, to answer your
15 question -- Actually, can you ask the question again,
16 please, Mr. Busse?
17 MR. BUSSE: Would you read it back.
18 (The question was read by the reporter.)
19 A So to answer your question, he didn't ever provide me
20 with a plan to expand the number of inmates in that
21 program.
13:41:29 22 Q BY MR. BUSSE: And so are the e-mails about that
23 "Where's the plan, where's the plan?"
24 A I don't recall a specific e-mail, but I know there
25 were conversations. And it was my hope that the PSU
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
33/150
33
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 review was going to provide that business case plan. It
2 did not.
13:41:52 3 Q Did you have conversations with him in which you
4 indicated your desire that the scope of work for the PSU
5 project should include that?
6 A Yes.
13:42:02 7 Q And you saw the scope of work on the contract for the
8 PSU contract. Did you talk with him about the scope of
9 work?
10 MR. LIPPOLD: Object to the form of the
11 question, introduces facts not in evidence. Go ahead.
12 A I did, and it was because of those conversations that
13 the scope of work was changed.
13:42:24 14 Q BY MR. BUSSE: To suit your desire --
15 A Correct.
13:42:31 16 Q -- correct? Thank you.
17 A At least one version of the revised was one that I
18 could agree with.
13:42:47 19 Q Great.
20 And when was it that he first led you to
21 believe he was not in line with the vision that you wanted
22 to take the department?
23 A I think from the -- the beginning of the
24 conversation. I believe the Phase I PSU report led me to
25 believe that he had other ideas in mind, that's what --
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
34/150
34
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 that's what inspired me to have those conversations with
2 him. We were able to, at one point, convince PSU to not
3 engage in a conversation that separated the two entities
4 in order to create that new business plan and that new
5 future.
6 Ultimately, that is not -- that is not how
7 they concluded their work, and Rob made it very clear that
8 separating those two entities was something that he
9 desired.
13:43:48 10 Q But that was something that was manifest to you, him
11 not being in line with your vision, soon after you became
12 Director?
13 A Yes. Yes. They had already begun and engaged in the
14 PSU work prior to me coming on board at DOC.
13:44:07 15 Q And you recall having conversations about the
16 disconnect on the vision through the spring and summer --
17 A Yes, sir, early on.
13:44:17 18 Q -- of 2012?
19 A Correct.
13:44:22 20 Q Were there any such conversations in the fall of 2012
21 on that same subject?
22 A Yes, I'm sure there had to have been in the fall, as
23 well. I don't -- I don't recall when the report was
24 finalized, but we would have been engaged in those
25 conversations until that report was finalized.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
35/150
35
www.LNScourtreporting.com
13:44:52 1 Q And do you recall any conversations, then, on that
2 same subject in October?
3 A Not specifically in October, but I know the
4 conversations were ongoing during the entire work of the
5 PSU report.
13:45:03 6 Q How about November, any specific conversations in
7 November?
8 A Again, I don't recall specifics, but I know that the
9 conversations were ongoing until that report was
10 completed.
13:45:12 11 Q How about December?
12 A Again, I don't recall any specifics, but I know the
13 conversations continued during the entirety of the PSU
14 work.
13:45:23 15 Q When was it completed?
16 A I don't recall.
13:45:27 17 Q Okay. How about January, do you recall any
18 conversations in January on that subject?
19 A So I don't recall any specific conversations -- or,
20 excuse me, any specific time frame for those
21 conversations, but I do know that the conversations
22 continued during the entire work of PSU.
13:45:44 23 Q How about February?
24 A That would include February.
13:45:59 25 Q And were there any events or incidents or
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
36/150
36
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 conversations in March that you can recall that were on
2 that same subject?
3 A Again, my statement would refer to March, as well.
13:46:09 4 Q And I'm talking about March of 2013.
5 A M-hm.
13:46:12 6 Q You understood that.
7 A Yes.
13:46:19 8 Q Okay. Prior to his termination, had Mr. Killgore
9 objected to any of the requests the Department of
10 Corrections was making concerning the expenditure of OCE
11 funds?
12 A Yes.
13:46:37 13 Q And were you aware, at the time that you took over,
14 that he had expressed those concerns?
15 A Yes.
13:46:50 16 Q When did you first learn of his concerns?
17 A I don't recall exactly when I first learned of his
18 concerns, but I do know that when I became Director and he
19 brought those concerns forward we, very early on in my
20 tenure, created a memorandum of understanding to provide
21 clarity around the issue.
13:47:21 22 Q And that issue having to do with the Constitutional
23 mandate that the funds from prison work programs be used
24 only for implementing, maintaining, and developing prison
25 work programs?
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
37/150
37
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 A Yes.
13:47:36 2 Q And you knew that even before you were the director;
3 correct?
4 A For clarification, knew of his concerns?
13:47:44 5 Q No, no. Of the Constitutional limitation.
6 A I did.
13:47:48 7 Q Okay. For what period of time had you known about it
8 prior to that?
9 A I would have learned that in coming to the Department
10 of Corrections in the spring of 2004 as the public affairs
11 administrator.
13:48:08 12 Q And what concerns of his did you come to learn of
13 prior to assuming the directorship?
14 A I had heard from Director Williams that Mr. Killgore
15 had concerns around some of the expenditures prior to his
16 departure.
13:48:31 17 Q And what did Mr. Williams tell you were
18 Mr. Killgore's concerns?
19 A I don't remember all of the specifics. I do remember
20 two cases in particular, and those were paying for some of
21 the items at Officer Buddy Herron's funeral and a donation
22 made to either a specific Boy Scout troop or Boy Scouts
23 generally.
13:48:52 24 Q And what did Mr. Williams tell you he made of those
25 concerns?
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
38/150
38
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 A Um, I don't remember the specifics, but generally he
2 had talked through the -- his logic around those
3 expenditures with Mr. Killgore and thought that
4 Mr. Killgore understood and agreed with his thinking at
5 the time.
13:49:18 6 Q And did Mr. Williams tell you that he was passing
7 this information on to you because apparently that did not
8 mollify Mr. Killgore?
9 A I'm sorry, it didn't what Mr. Killgore?
13:49:32 10 Q Assuage Mr. Killgore's concerns, or take care of them
11 or alleviate them.
12 A If I'm recalling directly -- correctly, pardon me, it
13 was -- Mr. Williams actually briefed me while I was the
14 director at the Oregon Youth Authority prior to being
15 appointed as Director of the Department of Corrections.
13:49:54 16 Q All right. And was he briefing you in anticipation
17 that you would become Director and succeed him?
18 A No. Just as Director to Director.
13:50:03 19 Q Do you recall why it was that he was involving you or
20 telling you of these concerns of Mr. Killgore?
21 A We would talk regularly about the comings and goings
22 of each others' agencies and often relied on each other as
23 we engaged in running similar operations.
13:50:22 24 Q Did you have more than one conversation with
25 Mr. Williams on this subject before you assumed the
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
39/150
39
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 directorship of the Department of Corrections?
2 A Not that I recall.
13:50:31 3 Q Did you offer any advice or feedback to Mr. Williams,
4 having heard his -- having related this conversation with
5 Mr. Killgore to you about Mr. Killgore's concerns?
6 A I don't remember specifically. It -- I do remember
7 just generally having him explain the situation. I'm sure
8 I asked questions and tried to understand it. But I do
9 remember agreeing with Mr. Williams' logic.
13:50:58 10 Q About whether or not the funds were appropriately
11 spent?
12 A Yes.
13:51:04 13 Q What was his logic on the Buddy Herron funeral?
14 A So his thinking was that, over the years, Oregon
15 Corrections Enterprise would engage in purchases in
16 goodwill or good faith to engage the Department of
17 Corrections in that partnership and that purchasing those
18 things for an officer's family who had just been murdered
19 certainly fell in line with previously-used logic.
13:51:43 20 Q How does goodwill relate to the Constitutional
21 limitation that the funds only be spent for implementing,
22 maintaining, or developing prison work programs?
23 A So in the interest of full disclosure, I am not a
24 lawyer, but I do know that we relied on a DOJ opinion to
25 talk about what would be appropriate in terms of marketing
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
40/150
40
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 and this idea of goodwill between the two agencies.
13:52:08 2 Q Whose opinion was that?
3 A It was from the Department of Justice.
13:52:12 4 Q Do you know who wrote it?
5 A I do not recall.
13:52:14 6 Q When did you read it?
7 A I know that I read it while Director of the
8 Department of Corrections.
13:52:30 9 Q Is this one of the opinions that Mr. Killgore brought
10 to your attention?
11 A It is. And the reason I'm hesitating is because I'm
12 vaguely remembering having to read it in my previous role
13 at the Department of Corrections, as well, but I'm not
14 remembering the specific reason why.
13:52:53 15 Q And what was Mr. Williams' rationale on the Boy Scout
16 contribution that you agreed with?
17 A His thinking was that as Oregon Corrections
18 Enterprise was engaging in the manufacturing of items that
19 the Boy Scouts could potentially purchase that it would be
20 a good marketing event to -- I believe he hosted a table
21 at -- at a fund-raising event, and Mr. Williams' logic was
22 that that could be a good advertising slash marketing
23 business move.
13:53:21 24 Q And you agreed with that.
25 A I did.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
41/150
41
www.LNScourtreporting.com
13:53:23 1 Q What items could the Boy Scouts purchase that would
2 fall within that category?
3 A I don't remember the specifics.
13:53:37 4 Q And what was the size of the contribution to the Boy
5 Scouts?
6 A I do not know.
13:53:41 7 Q Have the Boy Scouts ever made any purchases from OCE?
8 A I do not know.
13:53:50 9 Q But you agree that could be a good business approach?
10 A Yes.
13:54:02 11 Q And so did you learn of any other objection
12 Mr. Killgore made before assuming the directorship in
13 2012?
14 A Not that I recall.
13:54:16 15 Q After assuming the directorship in 2012, did you
16 learn of any objection he was continuing to make?
17 A Yes. He brought concerns forward to me.
13:54:26 18 Q And what concerns did he first bring to you?
19 A I don't re -- I won't be able to recall the list of
20 concerns he brought forward or in what order, but some --
21 another one that I'm remembering is a concern he had
22 around purchasing items during corrections employees week.
13:54:50 23 Q And what was the basis for his objection there?
24 A The sense that I got from Rob is that, while he felt
25 like there was legal support to provide some level of
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
42/150
42
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 goodwill, if you will, to the Department of Corrections,
2 that in his mind it had gotten out of hand. I don't know
3 that he specifically objected to the purchasing of goods
4 during corrections employees week, it was more the
5 magnitude of it all.
13:55:27 6 Q And did he offer up any information that shed light
7 on his opinion as to why it had gotten that way?
8 A I don't believe he did.
13:55:38 9 Q Did you ask any probing questions about that?
10 A I don't remember any specific questions, but I know
11 we had lengthy conversation and -- or even conversations,
12 and it concluded with trying to provide clarity around the
13 issue based on the legal determination. And as I
14 mentioned earlier, the conversations resulted in the two
15 of us signing a memorandum of understanding between the
16 two agencies and communicating that out to DOC and OCE
17 personnel, in hopes to provide that clarity.
13:56:13 18 Q Did Mr. Killgore raise with you his concern about the
19 Buddy Herron funeral expenses?
20 A He did.
13:56:21 21 Q So apparently he was not satisfied by Mr. Williams'
22 explanation.
23 A Correct. As I mentioned earlier, he brought it
24 forward; we had a thoughtful conversation around it; I
25 shared my logic and thinking, he shared his concerns. By
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
43/150
43
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 the end of the conversation, he was in agreement with my
2 logic at that meeting.
13:56:43 3 Q Before sharing your logic about it, had you done any
4 work or research in the area?
5 A No. I remember relying on him to provide me, in that
6 conversation, kind of the background work that he had done
7 on the expenses.
13:57:03 8 Q What background work had he done that he shared with
9 you?
10 A I don't remember the specifics, except that I know it
11 included the DOJ memo.
13:57:15 12 Q One or more than one?
13 A For clarification, one or more of one of what?
13:57:18 14 Q Legal opinions from the Department of Justice.
15 A I believe it included two DOJ opinions.
13:57:25 16 Q And did you read them before sharing your logic?
17 A I did.
13:57:34 18 Q Did he also raise concerns with you about the earlier
19 item that he had raised with Mr. Williams, the Boy Scout
20 donation?
21 A Yes, he did.
13:57:43 22 Q And what did he say to you as to why he thought that
23 was inappropriate?
24 A I believe he wasn't convinced that they would become
25 a customer or client.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
44/150
44
www.LNScourtreporting.com
13:58:01 1 Q Does that seem like a legitimate factor to take into
2 consideration?
3 A Absolutely. My question to him was, "Then why didn't
4 you pose that when Mr. Williams suggested the event?"
13:58:15 5 Q How do you know he didn't?
6 MR. LIPPOLD: Object to the form of the
7 question, calls for speculation. Go ahead.
8 A Mr. Killgore told me he didn't and Mr. Williams told
9 me he didn't.
13:58:25 10 Q BY MR. BUSSE: Okay. And what was Mr. Killgore's
11 response?
12 A He -- I -- if I remember correctly, it was something
13 he hadn't really thought of at the time, it was something
14 that bothered him later.
13:58:36 15 Q Okay. Does that make sense to you?
16 A Yes.
13:58:43 17 Q Okay. Do you recall any other specific example
18 Mr. Killgore gave to you that was giving him pause for
19 concern about the propriety of what was going on?
20 A I don't recall any more specific examples, but it was
21 enough that it concerned me and I knew that we needed to,
22 one, ensure that there was clarity around this issue, and
23 I had hoped and in fact what did happen is it did provide
24 clarity by creating that memorandum of understanding.
13:59:26 25 Q Now, when he had these conversations with you, did
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
45/150
45
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 you have conversations with anybody else about his
2 concerns?
3 A When Mr. Killgore had these conversations with me,
4 for clarity?
13:59:37 5 Q Yes.
6 A Yes.
13:59:38 7 Q Who did you speak with?
8 A So, I know that I had conversations with Deputy
9 Director Morrow, and many of our conversations, if not
10 all, I think, with Mr. Killgore were with Mr. Morrow. I
11 know I would have consulted the inspector general and the
12 Department of Justice.
13:59:59 13 Q Who in the Department of Justice?
14 A On this particular issue, I know I would have
15 consulted Jeff Vanvalkenburgh. But beyond that, I'm not
16 recalling specific attorneys.
14:00:17 17 Q Did you ask for an opinion from Mr. Vanvalkenburgh?
18 A No, but I know I discussed previous opinions.
14:00:26 19 Q Do you recall when those conversations were with
20 Mr. Vanvalkenburgh?
21 A I do not recall specifically.
14:00:46 22 Q Did Mitch Morrow also tell you that Mr. Killgore had
23 raised concerns with him directly about these
24 expenditures?
25 A Yes.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
46/150
46
www.LNScourtreporting.com
14:00:56 1 Q And do you recall what examples Mr. Morrow gave to
2 you about the concerns Mr. Killgore was raising with him
3 directly?
4 A I do not recall the specifics.
14:01:09 5 Q Did you have one or more than one conversation with
6 Mr. Morrow about that?
7 A Multiple.
14:01:17 8 Q And did those conversations extend through 2012?
9 A Yes.
14:01:25 10 Q Did Mr. Morrow and Mr. Williams communicate to you
11 that Mr. Killgore was expressing concern that OCE was
12 being used by DOC as a slush fund?
13 A Yes.
14:01:47 14 Q Did you meet with Mr. Killgore and Mr. Morrow on or
15 about February 7th at which Mr. Killgore raised those
16 issues with you?
17 A I do not remember the exact date of the meeting, but
18 I know that there was a meeting and we discussed those
19 issues, and the slush fund issue was tied directly into
20 that -- those goodwill and marketing concerns that
21 Mr. Killgore had brought forward to me, as well.
14:02:16 22 Q Do you deny that the DOC had been using OCE as a
23 slush fund?
24 A Yes. I don't see that the agency was utilizing OCE
25 as a slush fund.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
47/150
47
www.LNScourtreporting.com
14:02:32 1 Q And do you agree that it would be inappropriate for
2 it to do so?
3 MR. LIPPOLD: Object to the form of the
4 question, vague, calls for speculation.
14:02:38 5 Q BY MR. BUSSE: You can answer.
6 A Yes.
7 MR. LIPPOLD: Can we take a break? We've
8 been at it for about an hour.
9 (A recess was taken.)
14:07:12 10 Q BY MR. BUSSE: At the meeting that you mentioned with
11 the three of you, Mr. Morrow, Mr. Killgore, and yourself,
12 did Mr. Killgore refer to the fact that he wanted to have
13 an independent review of OCE expenditures?
14 A I do not recall that request or recommendation.
14:07:30 15 Q Did you say that you didn't want to have an
16 independent review?
17 A I don't recall denying that request.
14:07:36 18 Q At that meeting, did he mention the PSU contract?
19 A I don't know specifically if the contract was
20 mentioned at that meeting.
14:07:46 21 Q Do you recall him saying that he wanted the PSU
22 contract to include a review of the OCE expenditures?
23 A I don't recall specifically. It wouldn't surprise
24 me; as you're doing a business case plan and review of an
25 organization like OCE, I would suspect that it would
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
48/150
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
49/150
49
www.LNScourtreporting.com
14:09:17 1 Q Did you say during that meeting, "It's perfectly okay
2 to hire relatives, so long as there's no, quote, wink
3 wink, end quote, involved"?
4 A I don't recall saying that, either.
14:09:27 5 Q Do you know whether Mr. Morrow involved himself in
6 the issues pertaining to his son during his son's
7 employment with the department?
8 A Yes.
14:09:37 9 Q What issues are you aware of that Mr. Morrow involved
10 himself with?
11 A I know that Mr. Morrow called Nick Armenakis to
12 inquire about why they were denying his son moving
13 expenses.
14:09:51 14 Q To ask about it?
15 A Yes.
14:09:53 16 Q Or to chastise Mr. Armenakis for the amount he was
17 paying his son?
18 A To ask him --
19 MR. LIPPOLD: Objection -- objection,
20 argumentative. Go ahead.
21 A To ask him about it.
14:10:07 22 Q BY MR. BUSSE: Do you have any information that
23 Mr. Morrow did anything but that in that conversation?
24 A No.
25 MR. LIPPOLD: Objection, vague.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
50/150
50
www.LNScourtreporting.com
14:10:25 1 Q BY MR. BUSSE: At the meeting with the three of you
2 in early February, did you tell Mr. Killgore to set up a
3 meeting with Phil Keisling without Mr. Killgore present?
4 A I do not recall.
14:10:39 5 Q Was there any reason that you can think of here today
6 why you wanted to exclude Mr. Killgore from further
7 discussions with PSU about that contract?
8 A I --
9 MR. LIPPOLD: Object to the form of the
10 question, vague. Go ahead.
11 A I do not recall.
14:10:57 12 Q BY MR. BUSSE: At that meeting, did you say that you
13 wanted to handle issues that Mr. Killgore was raising
14 through an MOU?
15 A I don't recall that it specifically came out of that
16 particular meeting, but I do know that the idea of an MOU
17 came out of discussions with Mr. Killgore.
14:11:17 18 Q That was your idea; right?
19 A Yes, I believe it was.
14:11:21 20 Q Okay. And you were aware that Neil Bryant was
21 advising Mr. Killgore on the language of the MOU that was
22 being developed afterwards; correct?
23 A I don't know that I knew Mr. Bryant was -- I don't
24 recall that Mr. Bryant was working on that particular
25 issue. I knew that he was consulting on the CAFR issue.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
51/150
51
www.LNScourtreporting.com
14:11:43 1 Q And you also knew that he was working on the Ecotex
2 matter, as well; correct?
3 A Yes, that is correct.
14:11:57 4 Q And did you, when you found out he was working on the
5 CAFR issue, tell Mr. Killgore that he shouldn't be doing
6 that?
7 A Sorry, for clarification, that Mr. Bryant shouldn't
8 be consulting on the CAFR?
14:12:09 9 Q Right.
10 A No, I did not.
14:12:11 11 Q And did you tell Mr. Killgore that Mr. Bryant
12 shouldn't be consulting on the Ecotex matter?
13 A No, I did not, not until I learned that Neil Bryant
14 was hired without the knowledge of the Department of
15 Justice. As soon as I found out that he was on contract
16 without their knowledge and outside of the statutory
17 ability to do so, then I asked Mr. Killgore to end the
18 relationship with Mr. Bryant.
14:12:37 19 Q And did Mr. Killgore comply with that request?
20 A Yes.
14:12:50 21 Q Immediately.
22 A Yes.
14:12:50 23 Q And do you know whether it was Mr. Williams who had
24 approved the hiring of Mr. Bryant?
25 A I do not recall the former director approving that.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
52/150
52
www.LNScourtreporting.com
14:12:58 1 Q Do you know whether or not he did?
2 A No.
14:13:11 3 Q Did you and Mr. Morrow and Mr. Killgore meet again
4 later in February on these same issues?
5 A I know we had multiple meetings throughout the year,
6 but the specific dates, sir, I don't remember.
14:13:26 7 Q At a February 22nd meeting, did you tell Mr. Killgore
8 that you did not want to -- want the Department of Justice
9 to review this matter?
10 A I do --
11 MR. LIPPOLD: Object to the form of the
12 question, vague. Go ahead.
13 A For clarification, which matter?
14:13:47 14 Q BY MR. BUSSE: The expenditures of OCE funds.
15 A Again, I don't recall Mr. Killgore asking that the
16 Department of Justice request -- or, excuse me, ask me if
17 the Department of Justice should review his expenditures.
14:14:03 18 Q Did you tell Mr. Killgore, whether or not he
19 initially suggested it, that you did not want a DOJ review
20 of OCE expenditures?
21 A No, I do not recall denying that request.
14:14:14 22 Q No, I'm not asking -- This is independent of any
23 request, because you don't recall him making one.
24 A Okay.
14:14:21 25 Q I'm asking whether or not you told him, "I don't want
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
53/150
53
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 a DOJ review of OCE expenditures."
2 A No, I do not recall saying that.
14:14:32 3 Q Did you and Mr. Morrow meet with Phil Keisling on or
4 about March 5th without Mr. Killgore present?
5 A Again, I do not recall the date, but I'm vaguely
6 remembering having a meeting with Mr. Morrow,
7 Mr. Killgore, and Phil in Dr. -- Easling? -- I forget his
8 last name.
14:15:02 9 Q Did you exclude Mr. Killgore from any meeting with
10 PSU officials for any particular reason?
11 A Not that I remember.
14:15:11 12 Q The contract in question was supposed to be a
13 contract between PSU and OCE; correct?
14 A Correct.
14:15:16 15 Q And by law, OCE is a semi-independent agency;
16 correct?
17 A Correct.
14:15:21 18 Q What does "semi-independent" mean to you?
19 A It is a legal status designated to very few agencies,
20 but it allows for revenue-generating ability that General
21 Fund agencies would not be able to engage in; therefore,
22 its semi-independent status primarily is for that reason
23 with Oregon Corrections Enterprise.
14:15:55 24 Q Do you believe that the Department of Corrections had
25 the authority to direct the expenditures of OCE?
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
54/150
54
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 A I think -- Actually, I'm going to ask for
2 clarification. Are you talking about specific
3 expenditures?
14:16:13 4 Q Tell 'em how to spend their money.
5 A Um, I think that the actual expenditure of funds is
6 the responsibility of the administrator of the Oregon
7 Corrections Enterprise. I see it as my responsibility to
8 ensure that those monies are being spent wisely and, of
9 course, that they remain self-funded.
14:16:37 10 Q So you believe that the DOC director does not have
11 the authority to tell the director of OCE how to spend the
12 OCE funds; correct?
13 A No, I think the administrator of OCE is responsible
14 for the actual expending of funds. Where the
15 administrator takes the agency or what sort of business
16 case plan the administrator puts together, it's my
17 responsibility as the director of the Department of
18 Corrections to oversee that.
14:17:08 19 Q I don't think that answered my question. The
20 director of the Department of Corrections, in your view,
21 does that person have the authority to tell the director
22 of OCE how to spend OCE funds?
23 A I think it's the responsibility of the director of
24 the Department of Corrections to ensure that the way
25 they're spending those funds is in line with the vision
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
55/150
55
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 and where I want that agency to go.
14:17:35 2 Q That's not my question.
3 A Maybe you could give me an example, maybe that would
4 be helpful.
14:17:40 5 Q Can the director of the Department of Corrections
6 tell the director of OCE, "I want you to spend 5,000 for
7 this"?
8 MR. LIPPOLD: Object to the form of the
9 question, asked and answered. Go ahead.
10 A So again, my answer would remain the same.
14:17:57 11 Q BY MR. BUSSE: No. That's a different question, it's
12 can the -- in your view, sitting in your position today,
13 can you pick up the phone and tell the director of OCE to
14 make a particular expenditure? Do you have that authority
15 or not, in your view? Very simple question.
16 A I think in that particular example that I could pick
17 up the phone and call the administrator of OCE and as an
18 executive member in the agency it would be a conversation,
19 it wouldn't be a dictate like you're presenting it. It
20 would be -- it would be a conversation, there would be
21 push and pull as -- as an executive team member of the
22 agency who reports to me and serves at my pleasure.
14:18:44 23 Q I'm talking about authority, not how it works in
24 practice. Does the director of the Department of
25 Corrections have the authority, in your view, to tell the
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
56/150
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
57/150
57
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 you would be acting inappropriately if you did make such a
2 directive --
3 A Again, I don't know that it would be inappropriate to
4 provide that specific of a direction, but I want to be
5 very clear that I understand my responsibility and roles,
6 which is I don't have expenditure authority at OCE.
14:20:43 7 Q When you say you don't know whether or not it would
8 be inappropriate, what do you mean by that?
9 A Um, I don't see that it would be inappropriate.
14:20:53 10 Q So it would be okay to do?
11 A Yes.
14:20:55 12 Q Thank you.
13 In March of 2012, did you issue a new
14 organization chart changing the OCE from having a dotted
15 line to a solid line in terms of DOC's authority over OCE?
16 A I did.
14:21:14 17 Q And why did you do that?
18 A Part of the vision that we had moving forward was
19 creating what we refer to as a four-legged stool and
20 figuring out how to take OCE, which had become very
21 disconnected from the agency, and making it more a part of
22 the policy group in terms of planning and visioning moving
23 forward. So I really wanted people to see OCE not as this
24 entity that was spinning out here by itself, but one that
25 was really acting in a symbiotic fashion with the other
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
58/150
58
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 three major divisions.
14:21:52 2 Q And did anyone consult with anyone as to whether that
3 change would be legal, given the Constitutional setup?
4 A No, I don't believe I requested a legal analysis on
5 the organizational chart.
14:22:08 6 Q So Jeff Vanvalkenburgh was not consulted against
7 that -- consulted about that?
8 A Not that I recall.
14:22:15 9 Q And you know of no recommendation he made against it.
10 A I do not.
14:22:23 11 Q In any event, there was no legal opinion that was
12 received by you on that subject.
13 A Not that I recall.
14:22:32 14 Q So you acted alone in doing that.
15 A I don't know that I would have acted alone. The
16 reorganization was one that we talked about with policy
17 group in formulating and kind of creating it together.
14:22:46 18 Q By "alone," did you consult with anybody outside the
19 Department of Corrections before doing that?
20 A Before the reorganization?
14:22:55 21 Q Yeah, before you changed that to a solid line.
22 A Not that I recall. Certainly I don't recall ever
23 talking to anyone about moving it from a solid line to a
24 dotted line.
14:23:05 25 Q Mr. Killgore proposed a career readiness center at
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
59/150
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
60/150
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
61/150
61
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 question, vague.
14:25:21 2 Q BY MR. BUSSE: You can answer.
3 A I recall generally having conversations with Rob
4 about his interactions with the union. I'm not
5 remembering specifics. I know there were concerns that
6 the union had brought forward early on, but those are
7 common; they seemed to be resolved in the meetings he was
8 having with AOCE at the time.
14:25:41 9 Q He was working on it?
10 A That's my recollection.
14:25:53 11 Q Okay. And had those concerns been resolved by the
12 fall?
13 A I don't recall the specific timeline.
14:26:00 14 Q Is it true Mark Warne resigned from the advisory
15 council when the contract with the AFL-CIO was signed?
16 A I do not -- I do not know.
14:26:21 17 Q Was Mr. Killgore involved in the resolution of the
18 ULP?
19 A I'm sorry, I don't recall the timeline or when the
20 ULP was resolved.
14:26:35 21 Q Okay. Do you know if his people were working on it?
22 A Yes, that's my understanding.
14:26:42 23 Q And who on his staff were working to get it resolved?
24 A I do not recall.
14:26:45 25 Q In July of 2012 during the annual audit commissioned
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
62/150
62
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 by the Secretary of State's office, were you advised that
2 for that year's audit Mr. Killgore had disclosed any
3 illegal or unethical activities to the auditor?
4 A I was aware of that.
14:27:01 5 Q And that Mr. Killgore had received an opinion from
6 Neil Bryant to report the support of the Herron funeral?
7 A I was aware of that.
14:27:09 8 Q And did Mr. Killgore in August say that the State
9 CAFR had the same reporting requirement?
10 A Yes.
14:27:17 11 Q And on August 22nd, is it true that in a meeting with
12 you and Mr. Morrow and Mr. Killgore you said you didn't
13 want to report that incident?
14 A For clarification, it was not that I did not want to
15 report it. We had investigated what the situation was
16 about and what typically is reported in the CAFR report,
17 and I informed Mr. Killgore that something of this nature
18 is not something that's typically reported in a CAFR
19 report.
14:27:45 20 Q What investigation did you undertake before imparting
21 that advice?
22 A I spoke with both our assistant director responsible
23 for general services, who also is responsible for
24 reporting things in the CAFR report, as well as Neil
25 Bryant himself. And once both Neil Bryant and I had
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
63/150
63
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 gathered all the facts as we knew them, we were both in
2 agreement that it did not need to go into the CAFR report.
14:28:10 3 Q Who was the assistant director that you spoke with?
4 A Tami Dohrman.
14:28:16 5 Q What did you tell her and what did she say to you?
6 A We just re -- explained the response -- Or, excuse
7 me, for clarification, Deputy Director Morrow spoke
8 directly with Ms. Dohrman --
14:28:27 9 Q Ah.
10 A -- and he explained to her the concerns that were
11 being brought forward, the amount that was spent, and the
12 determination that she made was that it was such a small
13 amount that is not something that would -- typically would
14 be reported in a CAFR report.
14:28:46 15 Q What did she say was the amount that above which you
16 would report it?
17 A I don't recall, but I remember there being a
18 substantial gap between the two amounts.
14:28:57 19 Q Are you an expert in what's to be reported in CAFR
20 and what's not to be?
21 A I am not.
14:29:07 22 Q And did you rely upon Mr. Morrow to impart all of the
23 information that would be necessary for Tami to provide
24 confident advice on the matter?
25 A Correct.
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
64/150
64
www.LNScourtreporting.com
14:29:20 1 Q Do you know whether or not he told her about the
2 Constitutional limitation that Mr. Killgore was raising on
3 the issue?
4 A I don't know specifically what they talked about.
14:29:34 5 Q This concern was in the context of that which
6 Mr. Killgore was raising, however; right?
7 A Correct. So I can assume it would be part of the
8 conversation, but I don't know for sure, I wasn't privy to
9 the conversation.
14:29:46 10 Q You would expect that he would raise that with her;
11 correct?
12 A Or -- I would either expect that Mr. Morrow would
13 raise it or, even more so, expect that Ms. Dohrman would
14 be familiar with that statute.
14:29:59 15 Q Do you know if she is?
16 A I do not know.
14:30:02 17 Q Did you ask Mr. Morrow whether or not they discussed
18 it?
19 A Not that I recall.
14:30:06 20 Q Or her knowledge of it?
21 A Not that I recall.
14:30:13 22 Q And then you say that you spoke with Neil Bryant. At
23 the meeting that you had with Mr. Killgore, did you say
24 that you didn't want to report -- I'm sorry.
25 Did you say in that meeting that Mr. Killgore
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
65/150
65
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 had supported activities like that before?
2 A I don't recall specifically what I said, but I
3 remember thinking that I wasn't understanding the logic,
4 and so maybe that's the -- the quote that you have there.
5 I remember thinking that if the -- if the Buddy Herron
6 funeral expenses needed to go in the CAFR report, then all
7 these other concerns that Mr. Killgore brought forward
8 should go into the CAFR report, and so that's what made me
9 stop, pause, and ask questions and investigate a little
10 further, because it just seemed flawed on its face that we
11 were just pulling one thing out for the CAFR report.
14:31:26 12 Q Did you tell Mr. Morrow to ask Tami whether or not,
13 indeed and in fact, these other things should be reported
14 in the CAFR, given the fact that if you amalgamate their
15 value it's a much larger number?
16 A I don't remember specifically.
14:31:44 17 Q Do you recall whether or not the corrections week
18 activities came up in that conversation with Mr. Killgore?
19 A I don't recall.
14:31:56 20 Q How about the laundry contract?
21 A I don't recall specifics.
14:31:57 22 Q How about hiring practices?
23 A I don't recall if that came up in that -- during that
24 meeting.
14:32:12 25 Q Did Mr. Killgore ever claim that he had only made
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
66/150
66
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 certain expenditures because he was under duress from
2 Mr. Morrow?
3 A Again, I don't remember when I learned of that
4 specific allegation. I know that's something that he
5 brought forward in the criminal investigation, but I don't
6 know if that was something I knew prior to that time.
14:32:37 7 Q Did you ever talk to Mr. Morrow about that?
8 A Yes.
14:32:42 9 Q When did you talk to Mr. Morrow about that?
10 A I don't recall.
14:32:45 11 Q What did you ask him?
12 A I don't recall specifically what I asked him. I know
13 that we've had conversations around kind of learning the
14 history of who was hired, who was recommended. And much
15 of it I had remembered, having been at the Department of
16 Corrections before, but some of it was new to me, and so
17 it was more of an education around -- around those --
18 those hires.
14:33:14 19 Q And did Mr. Morrow -- Well, did you ask him
20 straight-out, "Did you apply any duress on any of these
21 hires?"
22 A I didn't have to ask him straight-out; he was
23 forthcoming to me that he did not.
14:33:27 24 Q Oh, okay. So he preempted the question by saying, "I
25 never did anything like that."
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
67/150
67
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 A Correct.
14:33:37 2 Q Okay. At that same meeting with Mr. Killgore at
3 which these issues were discussed, did Mr. Killgore say he
4 refused to submit the State CAFR without the disclosure of
5 the Herron funeral unless Neil Bryant reversed his
6 opinion?
7 A I don't recall him making that statement, but that
8 would seem within reason --
14:34:01 9 Q Okay.
10 A -- since he had seen legal -- received legal advice.
14:34:06 11 Q Did you say that you would talk to Mr. Bryant to get
12 him to do that?
13 A I said I would engage in a conversation with
14 Mr. Bryant, but not necessarily to -- with the
15 preconceived notion that I would be able to sway him to
16 change his decision.
14:34:18 17 Q Isn't that -- wasn't that the intent of your contact
18 with Mr. Bryant?
19 MR. LIPPOLD: Object to the form of the
20 question, argumentative. Go ahead.
21 A I'm happy to discuss my intent. It wasn't that. It
22 really was to engage in a conversation and share my
23 thinking around the need to put it in the CAFR. And at
24 the conclusion of the conversation, Neil Bryant shared
25 with me that he had no experience or any background with
8/11/2019 Colette Peters Deposition
68/150
68
www.LNScourtreporting.com
1 the CAFR report. And so once I provided the information
2 that we had received from Ms. Dohrman, he was very
3 comfortable -- it was my opinion that he was very
4 comfortable stating that it no longer needed to be in the
5 CAFR report.
14:34:59 6 Q BY MR. BUSSE: What did you share with him about your
7 view of the need to put it in the CAFR?
8 A Some of the logic that I shared with you just minutes
9 ago around how it just didn't seem right that if there was
10 one portion that needed to go in the CAFR report then why
11 not everything else. And so I investigated further and
12 learned that it's really a substantial amount of money
13 lost before you put anything in the CAFR report. And once
14 he had that background and information, he changed his
15 opinion.
14:35:33 16 Q What was substantial -- what did you learn about the
17 substantial amount of money?
18 A Again, as I said earlier, I don't recall the amount.
19 I'm sure I had it, sir, at the time of my conversation
20
top related