Transcript
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 1
Management Control Systems,Transfer Pricing, and
Multinational Considerations
Chapter 22
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 2
Overview
• What is a Management Control System?• Centralized vs. decentralized control structure• Transfer pricing:
– Function
– Setting TPs
– Dual TPs
– Negotiated TPs (Calculating Min. & Max. range)
– International tax issues
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 3
Management Control Systems
A management control system is a meansof gathering and using information.
It guides the behavior of managers and employees.
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 4
Management Control Systems
Financial data
Formal control system
Nonfinancial data
Informal control system
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 5
Evaluating ManagementControl Systems
Motivation Goal congruence Effort
Lead to rewards
Monetary Nonmonetary
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 6
Organization (control) Structure
Total decentralization
Total centralization
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 7
Benefits of Decentralization
Creates greater responsiveness to local needs
Leads to gains from quicker decision making
Increases motivation of subunit managers
Assists management development and learning
Sharpens the focus of subunit managers
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 8
Limitations of Decentralization
Suboptimal decision making may occur
Focuses the manager’s attention on the subunitrather than the organization as a whole
Increases the costs of gathering information
Results in duplication of activities
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 9
Decentralization inMultinational Companies
Decentralization enables country managers tomake decisions that exploit their knowledge
of local business and political conditions.
Multinational corporations often rotatemanagers between foreign locations
and corporate headquarters.Control Problem: Barings Bank (200 yrs old)—1995 Nick Leeson caused over ₤1 B loss.
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 10
Responsibility Centers
Costcenter
Revenuecenter
Investmentcenter
Profitcenter
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 11
Transfer Pricing
A transfer price is the price one subunit chargesfor a product or service supplied to another
subunit of the same organization.
Intermediate products are the productstransferred between subunits of an
organization.
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 12
Transfer Pricing
Transfer pricing should: (1) help achievea company’s strategies and goals.
(2) fit the organization’s structure
(3) promote goal congruence
(4) promote a sustained high level of management effort
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 13
Transfer-Pricing Methods
Market-based transfer prices
Cost-based transfer prices
Negotiated transfer prices
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 14
Market-Based Transfer Prices
By using market-based transfer pricesin a perfectly competitive market, acompany can achieve the following:
Goal congruence
Management effort
Subunit performance evaluation
Subunit autonomy
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 15
Market-Based Transfer Prices
Market prices also serve to evaluate theeconomic viability and profitability
of divisions individually.
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 16
Market-Based Transfer Prices
When supply outstrips demand, market pricesmay drop well below their historical average.
Distress prices are the drop in pricesexpected to be temporary.
Basing transfer prices on depressed market prices will not always lead to optimal decisions for an organization.
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 17
Cost-based Transfer Prices
When transfer prices are
based on full cost plus a
markup, suboptimaldecisions can result.
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 18
Dual Transfer Prices
An example of dual pricing is for Larry & Co.to credit the Selling Division with
112% of the full cost transfer price of $24.64per barrel of crude oil.
Debit the Buying Division with the market-basedtransfer price of $23 per barrel of crude oil.
And debit a corporate account for the difference!
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 19
Negotiated Transfer Prices
Negotiated transfer prices arise from theoutcome of a bargaining process between
selling and buying divisions.
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 20
General Guideline: min. & max. transfer price
Minimum transfer price= Incremental costs per unit incurred
up to the point of transfer+ Opportunity costs per unit to the selling division
Incremental cost often times = variable costOpportunity costs often times = lost CMOpportunity costs could = lost savings
Maximum transfer price = Market price
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 21
Min. & Max. transfer price--examples
Some examples:
(1) Slowcar(2) S.F. Manufacturing
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 22
Slowcar Company
• The Assembly Division of SLOWCAR Company has offered to purchase 90,000 batteries from the Electrical Division (ED) for $104 per unit. At a normal volume of 250,000 batteries per year, production costs per battery are:
• Direct materials $40• Direct labor 20• Variable factory overhead 12• Fixed factory overhead 42• Total $114• The Electrical Division has been selling 250,000 batteries per year to outside
buyers for $136 each. Capacity is 350,000 batteries/year. The Assembly Division has been buying batteries from outside suppliers for $130 each.
• Should the Electrical Division manager accept the offer? Will an internal transfer be of any benefit to the company?
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 23
SF Manufacturing
• The SF Manufacturing Co. has two divisions in Iowa, the Supply Division and the BUY Division. Currently, the BUY Division buys a part (3,000 units) from Supply for $12.00 per unit. Supply wants to increase the price to BUY to $15.00. The controller of BUY claims that she cannot afford to go that high, as it will decrease the division’s profit to near zero. BUY can purchase the part from an outside supplier for $14.00. The cost figures for Supply are:
• Direct Materials $3.25• Direct Labor 4.75• Variable Overhead 0.60• Fixed Overhead 1.20• A. If Supply ceases to produce the parts for BUY, it will be able to avoid one-
third of the fixed MOH. Supply has no alternative uses for its facilities. Should BUY continue to get the units from Supply or start to purchase the units from the outside supplier? (From the standpoint of SF as a whole).
• (What is the min. & max. transfer price if BUY and SUPPLY negotiate?)
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 24
SF Mfg.—continued
• Now, assume that Supply could use the facilities currently used to produce the 3,000 units for BUY to make 5,000 units of a different product. The new product will sell for $16.00 and has the following costs:
• Direct Materials $3.00• Direct Labor 4.30• Variable Overhead 5.40
• B. What is the min. & max. transfer price if BUY and SUPPLY negotiate?
• C. What should be done from the company’s point of view? Why?
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 25
Comparison of Methods
Achieves Goal Congruence
Market Price: Yes, if markets competitive
Cost-Based: Often, but not always
Negotiated: Yes
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 26
Comparison of Methods
Useful for Evaluating Subunit Performance
Market Price: Yes, if markets competitive
Cost-Based:Difficult, unless transferprice exceeds full cost
Negotiated: Yes
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 27
Comparison of Methods
Motivates Management Effort
Market Price: Yes
Cost-Based:Yes, if based on budgetedcosts; less incentive ifbased on actual cost
Negotiated: Yes
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 28
Comparison of Methods
Preserves Subunit Autonomy
Market Price: Yes, if markets competitive
Cost-Based: No, it is rule based
Negotiated: Yes
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 29
Comparison of Methods
Other Factors
Market Price: No market may exist
Cost-Based:Useful for determiningfull-cost; easy to implement
Negotiated:Bargaining takes time andmay need to be reviewed
2009 Foster School of Business Cost Accounting L.DuCharme 30
Multinational Transfer Pricing
IRC Section 482 requires that transfer prices for both tangible and intangible property between a company and its foreign division be set to equal the price that would be charged by an unrelated third party in a comparable transaction (arm’s length).This still leaves a little “room to wiggle.”