CMS ECAL ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 1 The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter at the LHC D J A Cockerill on behalf of the CMS ECAL Group Introduction.
Post on 13-Dec-2015
219 Views
Preview:
Transcript
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 1
The CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter at the LHC
D J A Cockerillon behalf of the CMS ECAL Group
Introduction Calorimeter design Construction and installation Calibration Conclusions
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 2
Compact Muon Solenoid
ECALLocated inside solenoid
Design benchmarkH (MH < 140 GeV/c2)
Target resolution E/E ~0.5% for E>100GeV
Tracker
Muon chamber
s
HCAL
Iron yoke
3.8T solenoi
d
CMSWeight 12,500tDiameter 15mLength 21.6mMagnetic field 3.8T
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 3
Lead tungstate crystals
CaveatsLY temperature dependence -2.2%/OC Stabilise to 0.1OC
Formation/decay of colour centres Need precise light monitoring system
Low light yield (1.3% NaI) Need photodetectors with gain in magnetic field
Reasons for choice Homogeneous mediumFast light emission ~80% in 25 ns
Short radiation length X0 = 0.89 cm
Small Molière radius RM = 2.10 cm
Emission peak 425nm
Reasonable radiation resistance to very high doses
23cm 25.8Xo 22cm
24.7Xo
Barrel crystal, tapered34 types, ~2.6x2.6 cm2 at rear
Endcap crystal, tapered1 type, 3x3 cm2 at rear
Emission spectrum (blue)and transmission curve
425nm350nm
70%
300nm 700nm
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 4
ECAL Layout
Barrel36 Supermodules (18 per half barrel)61200 crystalsTotal crystal mass 67.4t|| < 1.48
x = 0.0175 x 0.0175
Tapered crystals to provide off-pointing of ~ 3o from vertex
Endcap PreshowerPb (2Xo,1Xo) / Si 4 Dees (2 per endcap)4300 Si strips1.8mm x 63mm1.65< || < 2.6
Endcaps4 Dees (2 per endcap)14648 crystals Total crystal mass 22.9t1.48< || < 3
x = 0.01752 ↔ 0.052
Barrel crystals
Pb/Si EndcapPreshower
Endcap ‘Dee’ with ‘Supercrystals’
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 5
Photodetectors
BarrelAvalanche photodiodes(APD)Two 5x5 mm2 APDs/crystalGain 50 QE ~75%Temperature dependence -2.4%/OC
40m
EndcapsVacuum phototriodes(VPT)More radiation resistant than Si diodes- UV glass window- Active area ~ 280 mm2/crystal- Gain 8 -10 (B=4T)- Q.E. ~20% at 420nm
= 26.5 mm
MESH ANODE
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 6
Electronics
On detector readoutOrganised around units of 25 (5x5) crystalsElectronics in radiation tolerant 0.25 m CMOS
Multi Gain Preamp (MGPA) with 3 gain rangesDigitisation by 12 bit ADC AD41240 at 40MHz
FE card sends ‘trigger primitive’ transverse energy sums at 40MHz to the counting room
FE card sends data upon L1 accept
Barrel
Barrel mean noise 41.5 MeV per channel
Off detectorTrigger Concentrator Cards (TCCs) receive FE card trigger primitives
TCCs send trigger tower energy sums to Regional Calorimeter Trigger (RCT) at 40MHz
Data Concentrator Card (DCC) reads FE dataand TCC information upon L1 acceptPerforms data reduction and transfers to DAQ
Very Front Endcards (VFE)
Front End card (FE)
Fibre optic readout at 800MHz to off detector electronics
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 7
Laser light monitoring system
Light injected into each crystal using quartz fibres, via the front (Barrel) or rear (Endcap)
Laser pulse to pulse variations followedwith pn diodes to 0.1%
Normalise calorimeter data to the measured changes in transparency
F1 F2
PIN FE
LaserS
PWO
F1 F2
PIN FE
LaserS
PWO
Colour centresThese form in PbWO4 under irradiation Partial recovery occurs in a few hours
Damage and recovery during LHC cycles tracked with a laser monitoring system
2 wavelengths: 440 nm and 796 nm
Black: during irradiationRed: after normalisation
1%
0.15%
Electron signal in crystal versus time (h)
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 8
CMS Barrel ECAL
Submodule10 crystals
A “naked” Supermodule
with 1700 crystals
Module 400/500 crystals
Laser monitoring fibres inserted to front of each xtal
Electronics and cooling installed
Installation of the last SM into the first half of EB
EB installation in CMS complete61200 channels, 27 July 2007
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 9
Barrel - commissioning
A plot of over 3.2 million hits in the BarrelECAL from cosmic ray triggered events in CMS
Top SMs
Bottom SMs
EB- EB+
Presence of the main shaft
Commissioning
The 36 Supermodules of the Barrel ECAL have been fully integrated into the trigger and readout chain of CMS
The detector has participated in several months of CMS cosmic runs and has recorded millions of cosmic ray events
The commissioning has been extremely important for debugging the trigger and data paths and for timing in the trigger primitives
CMS is now able to trigger with the full Barrel ECAL
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 10
Barrel - commissioning
A cosmic ray event in CMS involving the Barrel ECAL and Muon Drift Tubes
A dramatic cosmic ray muon bremstrahlung in the Barrel ECAL
Energy250 – 300 GeV
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 11
CMS Endcap ECAL
Supercrystal mounting on a Dee backplate
Supercrystal (SC)25 crystals/VPTs
A completed Dee with all Supercrystals
SC assy jig VPT HV cards
SC assy jig EE crystals
Cooling, electronics & optical readout mounted
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 12
CMS Endcap ECAL
Dee1 mounting on HE22 July 08
Dee2 mounting on HE24 July 08
Dee1 lowering and rotation 19 July 08
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 13
Preshower detectorMotivation: Improved 0/ discriminationRapidity coverage: 1.65 < || < 2.6 (End caps)
2 orthogonal planes of Si strip detectors behind 2 X0 and 1 X0 Pb respectively
Strip pitch: 1.9 mm (63 mm long)Area: 16.5 m2 (4300 detectors, 1.4 x105channels)
High radiation levels, dose after 10 yrs: 2 x 1014 n/cm2, 60 kGy => operate at -10oC
A micromodule with its silicon sensor (32 channels)
90% of micromodules have been produced
63mmThe first full Dee absorber with a complete complement of sensors
Preshower installation expected during winter shutdown 2008/9
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 14
Energy resolution
Energy resolution for electrons as a function of energy
Data folded in from 25 3x3 arrays from a trigger tower of 25 crystals, using common intercalibration constants
Electrons centrally (4mmx4mm) incident on the crystals
Stochastic term
Constant term
Noise term
Energy resolution at 120 GeV
Incident electrons from a 20x20mm2 trigger. Energy sum over 5x5 array centred on the hit crystal.
Universal position correction function for the reconstructed energy applied
Resolution 0.44%
Barrel Barrel
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 15
Mip deposits ~250MeV(increase APD gain from 50 to 200)
Beam and Cosmic Muon pre-calibration
Event: 4161 Cry: 168
All 36 SM exposed to cosmic ray muons for ~1 week
7 SM also exposed to electrons at test beam
Compare intercalibration results at test beam with those from cosmic ray muons
σ = 1.55%
Calibration coefficients from cosmic muons versus those from the test beam for 7 supermodules
Muon and test beam data will provide initial intercalibration coefficients in CMS to better than ~2% with muons for 28 SM and to~0.3% with beam for 8 SM for the Barrel ECAL
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 16
In-situ Calibration
Intercalibration precision at startup: – Barrel ECAL <2% (0.3% in ¼ of EB)– Endcap ECAL 15%
Startup (inter)calibrations– Rely on “fast” intercalibration procedures – “Daily” -symmetry and 0 calibrations (L=2.1033 cm-2s-1)– Exploit EB precalibration for validation and tuning– Quickly improve EE intercalibration accuracy
0 resonance, Barrel ECAL 2006 test beam
(Inter)calibrations in the long termExploit isolated electronsZee useful at startup after O(10 pb-1)
Calibration of electron scale with Zee
Calibration of photon scale with Z
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 17
CMS ECAL conclusions
• The high resolution CMS ECAL is near to completion
• Barrel ECAL fully installed and commissioned
• Endcap ECAL Dees 1, 2 and 3 installed, Dee 4 installed by end this week
• Pre-shower detector installation in winter shutdown
• Test beam studies with 9 SMs have demonstrated excellent performance
• All barrel channels intercalibrated to better than 2%
• The Barrel ECAL has been commissioned and integrated into CMS
• The Barrel ECAL participates in CMS global trigger and data taking
• ECAL calibration strategies in place for LHC startup
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 18
Spares
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 19
Aims (TDR) Barrel End cap a stochastic term 2.7% 5.7% p.e. stat, shower fluct, photo-detector, lateral leakage
b constant term 0.55% 0.55% non-uniformities, inter-calibration, longitudinal leakage
c noise low L 155 MeV 770 MeV high L 210 MeV 915 MeV
ECAL design objectives
A H event in CMS with MH=120GeV
High resolution electromagneticcalorimetry central to CMS design
Benchmark process: H m / m = 0.5 [E1/ E1 E2/ E2 / tan( / 2 )]
with resolution E / E = a / E b c/ E
Monte Carlo analyses: 5σ discovery potential for 115<MH<140GeV with 8 -16 fb-1
Electronics, pileup
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 20
Off-Detector electronics
Clock & Control System Card (CCS)
Data Concentrator Card (DCC)
Trigger Concentrator Card (TCC)
Selective Readout Processor (SRP)
TTC Trigger and Timing CardTTS Trigger Throttling SystemmFEC mezzanine Front End Controller card (connects to FE card via token ring)SLB Synchronisation and Link Board mezzanine
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 21
π0 Calibration Concept
• Level 1 trigger rate dominated by QCD: several π0s/event
• Useful π0γγ decays selected online from such events
• Main advantage: high π0 rate (nominal L1 rate is 100kHz !)
• “Design” calibration precision better than 0.5% Achieving it would be crucial for the Hγγ detection
• Studies performed with about four million fully simulated QCD events. Results given for the scenario of L=2x1033cm-2s-1 and L1 rate of 10 kHz.
Data after L1 Trigger Online Farm 0 Calibration
>10 kHz~1 kHz
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 22
22
Calibration of CMS ECAL using π0γγ Decays
Barrel study at L=2x10L=2x103333cmcm-2-2ss-1 -1 π0γγ rate of 1.5 kHzrate of 1.5 kHz 2,100 2,100 ππ00/crystal/day, signal-to-background /crystal/day, signal-to-background ≈ 2.0.≈ 2.0.Only 20 - 80 hours to calibrate 95% of barrel.Only 20 - 80 hours to calibrate 95% of barrel.Exploit immediately after the startup!Exploit immediately after the startup!
First Resonance Observed by CMS! (2006 Test beams)
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 23
In-situ CalibrationStrategy at startup – Phi symmetry
Rapid achievement of ~2% intercalibration symmetry of energy deposition ( intercalibration) in rings of crystalsL1 triggers – single crystals, 1-6 GeV transverse energy (barrel)
Blue – after a few hours of data taking, luminosity 2.1033 cm-2s-2
Red - after ~ 1 day of data takingLimit on precision due to tracker material etc
Pre
cisi
on
(%
)
2%
4%
Barrel Eta Endcap Eta
****** NOT FINAL ******
Monte Carlo results using
notional tracker material
budget estimates only
CMS ECAL
ICHEP 2008 D J A Cockerill - RAL 24
During assembly, all detector components are characterised
Thus the relative calibration ci of each channel may be estimated:
Where: LY is crystal light yield, M and Q are gain and quantum efficiency of the photo-detectors
cele is the calibration of the electronics chain
Intercalibration from Laboratory Measurements
= 4.2%Test beam vs Lab IntercalibrationRatio:Test beam/Lab
top related