Chicago and Illinois – Integration Through Collaboration · • Replication activity bi-weekly – sharing data with central registry Quarterly training for new TOTS users 36 Computer
Post on 22-Jun-2020
0 Views
Preview:
Transcript
11/4/2003
1
Chicago and Illinois –Integration Through
CollaborationA Model for Building Sustainable Registry
Services
Illinois - Chicago Immunization Collaboration (“I-CIC for ICARE”)
I-CIC
2
I-CIC Plenary Participants
AALLLLIIAANNCCEE Of Chicago Community Health Services, LLC
Chicago Area Immunization Campaign
Chicago Department of Public Health
11/4/2003
2
3
Agenda1. Vision, People and Process (Brian Bragg)
2. Implementation and Technology (Alex Lippitt)
3. PanelKey Pieces of the Puzzle (Alex Lippitt)
The TOTS / ICARE Registry (Karen Austin)
The City of Chicago (Maribel Chavez-Torres)
View From the Provider…Software Solution, That is(Mark Leavitt)
4. Wrap-up-Next Steps: We Need You (Alex Lippitt)
5. Discussion (Allan Lieberthal)
4
Immunization Focused Coalition
State DPH/DHS
City/Local DPH
Software Vendors
Public sector providers
National -CDC/CIRSET/AIRA
Private sector providers
Professional Organizations
Chicago Area Immunization Campaign
Brian Bragg, BAProject Director
11/4/2003
3
5
Immunization Registry Services and Integration
Immunization Registry
Clinical Practice By Patient•Complete History•Contraindications and immunities•Schedules: standard and projected
Clinical Operations – Practice guidelines,Vaccine inventory managementClinical Management – CASA, HEDIS, VAERS, etc. ReportingPatient and Patient Services – School and other records, multimedia reminder/recall
‘Healthcare Home’ eHR
6
Illinois Registry Workgroup FindingsProvider Focus Groups’ Findings:
- is effective in helping practice improve immunization rates,
- will help reduce over-immunization of children, and,
- will help provide more accurateinventory management
11/4/2003
4
7
Illinois Registry Workgroup Findings
Strong qualitative sentiment expressed for mandatory registry participation by providersDatabase will include generally reliable complete immunization records.
8
Reaching Tipping Point in Registry Usage
Registry Technology and Utilization State Public
Health
Hospital andAmbulatoryNetwork ProvidersSmall Providers -With Systems
Small Providers -With Office ToolsOnly
Mixed
Managed care can be any option but State Public Health
Mixed category includes: 1) people in different sectors2) people in same sector, with different providers
90% of people covered in Registry currently – only children: nationally, the foundation of the “43%” – other “private” sectors are key for growth.
11/4/2003
5
9
Barriers: Mandatory Usage Legislative Initiative
Time – The time it takes to input data into the system (double entry)
Data – Is the data complete? Is the data accurate?
10
The Integration Issue
BirthRegistry
Not in Illinois –Registry Not Sanctioned
Illinois ImmunizationRegistry
(not yet mandated)
‘Healthcare Home’ eHR
Only for immunizations covered with individual consents for each provider – in Illinois
Only a Dream For Now in USA –Siloed and Fragmented
Other ImmunizationRegistries
11/4/2003
6
11
SolutionIntegration of the registry with a practice management/billing system (PMS) and/or Electronic Health Record System (EHRS)
Saves time – no double entryIntegration would allow the correct data to be completely and accurately loaded onto the registryRegistry data could be trusted
12
Important Take-home Messages
Build Coalition Across CommunitiesBuild Coalition Among OrganizationsUse Experience and Best Practices to Guide Immunization RequirementsUse Current Standards as BaselineBuild Plan For Short, Mid and Long TermFocus on Technology Neutral SolutionsKeep Eye on Big Picture But Dot the Is
11/4/2003
7
13
Immunization Focused Coalition State
DPH/DHS
City/Local DPH
Software Vendors
Public sector providers
National -CDC/CIRSET/AIRA
Private sector providers
Professional Organizations
Alex Lippitt, MBACIO
AALLLLIIAANNCCEE Of Chicago Community Health Services, LLC
14
Immunization Encounter and Follow-up: Ideal Flow
Intake and Registration
Encounter-Nursing
Encounter-Provider Checkout
PMS EHRS EHRS /PMS
ICARE Immunization Registry
•Access, update history•Record historical
immunizations•Schedule immunization(s)
•Provide complete history•Provide clinical guidelines
•Record immunizations
Immunization tickler work in process data from
reminder/ recall flow
• Capture encounter immunization records
•Print forms – school, etc.•Schedule next immunization(s)
•Set up reminder/recall plan•Update vaccine inventory records•Update CASA, VAERS dataReminder/recall execution
11/4/2003
8
15
New NVAC StandardsPublished in Pediatrics - October 2003 issue. Provider Registry Electronic Interface efforts critical to meeting these standards:
6 of the 17 standards rely on integration efforts for success: ex • “12. Vaccination records for patients are
accurate, complete and easily accessible.”
8 more of the 17 standards are directly addressed
16
2004 Timeline – Proof of Concept4th Qtr 03 1st Qtr 04 2nd Qtr 04 3rd Qtr 04 4th Qtr 04 Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec
Startup Phase
Organize: Resource, Complete Agreements
Benchmark / Design Pilot / Implement Web Version
Pilot Implement Phase
Pilot 1 – PMS interface
Conduct pilot
Package and Disseminate
PMS Interface / Add Vendors
Pilot 2 - EHRS Interface
Small Provider Interface Design and Agreement
11/4/2003
9
17
Illinois Immunization Program1. Elimination of double entry and
integration into EHRS and PMS workflow with….
2. Clinical benefits and no more burdens for clinicians
3. Tipping point – clinical trust, use of registry
4. Enough support for Illinois to become opt-out state
18
Big Tent Solutions for markets currently not covered (levels):
A. Hospitals and Ambulatory Networks
B. Providers With Billing, PMS, EHRS - Minimum Data Set HL7 Transaction
C. Smaller Providers With Simple Tools (Microsoft Office, etc.) -HL7/XML/SOAP Flat File
11/4/2003
10
19
PMS/EHRSSmall PMS, Homegrown
Billing
Illinois TOTS/ICARE Registry Load -Late 2004 and Beyond
State Public Health
TOTS/ICARE/DPH
Small Providers
Hospitals and
Ambulatory Networks
CIRSET L 2, 3CIRSET L 1
TOTS Dial-up Web Access
Manual double entry
KeyExisting ElectronicProjected 2004 ElectronicFutureProjected 2004 ManualCurrent Manual NEW
Medicaid Global (Chicago, Cook County) WIC Case Mgmt
Cornerstone/DHS
Real timeMonthly Batch Weekly Batch
Some entry is double entry –behavioral services (ex: WIC)
NEW
20
2004 Long-term Key Deliverables -National
First Year GoalsFour large market share vendor commitmentsPMS interface and implementation toolkitEHRS interface and implementation toolkit
CDC/CIRSET/AIRA Standards SnowballKnowledge Base– National resource, linking existing knowledge and peopleImplementation Guide ExpansionExtension of PROW concept – Levels, etc.
11/4/2003
11
21
Building on Provider and Electronic Integration History
Public
PMS–1 way
EHRS
Various States –WIC, Medicaid, etc.
Illinois – Multiple
Utah –Intermountain Health
Michigan – MDServe
Houston-Harris County Registry
– GE Logician
Wisconsin - Epic
West VA –Medical Manager
2 wayIndiana-Marion County
County Registry– QS Tech Insight
Illinois – Multiple
1990s Now in Test In Development
Georgia – Multiple
22
Agenda
1. Vision, People and Process (Brian Bragg)
2. Implementation and Technology (Alex Lippitt)
3. PanelKey Pieces of the Puzzle (Alex Lippitt)
The TOTS / ICARE Registry (Karen Austin)
The City of Chicago (Maribel Chavez-Torres)
View From the Provider….Software Solution, That is (Mark Leavitt)
4. Wrap-up-Next Steps: We Need You (Alex Lippitt)
5. Discussion (Allan Lieberthal)
11/4/2003
12
23
Puzzle Pieces – Required to Get to Immunization Integration and Opt-OutImmunization Focused Coalition –Listening, Legislative Initiatives, Outreach, High energy cheerleading, IT/Clinical Integration, bringing together other puzzle pieces
State DPH/DHS – Strong standards-compliant registry with close working relationships with WIC/Medicaid
City/Local DPH – Key part of state plan, builds local coalitions
Software Vendors –Part of solution team; see win/win and united, organized, standards oriented environment
Public sector providers – Strong business case for leveraging of complete records to reach disparities populations and serve patients more efficiently and effectively
CDC/CIRSET/AIRA – Active and visible support and facilitation
Private sector providers – Similar to public sector but with more emphasis on cost reduction
Professional Organizations – Reflects interests of specialties and professions; especially local and state chapters of AAP, AAFP, AMA, ANA, AAPA
24
Project StructureIllinois Steering Group
Chicago DPH (funder)•Illinois DPH - TOTS – ICARE (sponsoring registry and funder)
•Chicago Area Immunization Campaign (CAIC)–•Immunization Registry Workgroup
•American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)– National Office and Illinois Chapter
•Illinois Maternal and Child Health Coalition•Alliance of Chicago Community Health Services (Alliance)
Program Office•Brian Bragg (CAIC)
•Alex Lippitt (Alliance)•Project Leader / Analyst (Alliance)
SMEs(Subject Matter Experts),
ReviewersContributors
NationalAdvisory Group
•CDC NIP•BPHC•AIRA
•CIRSET•CIRSET Vendor, Standards
Workgroup
Quality and Compliance Review Team
•TBD
Site Team •EHRS / PMS Vendor Team
IDPH Registry Team
11/4/2003
13
25
Cerner Webcast– October 03, 2003
Public Health•CDC – Atlanta•IDPH•CDPH•Cook County DPH
Outcomes•Cerner Design•Clinical Follow-up•Technical Follow-up•Cerner to CIRSET•HIPAA Compliance•Knowledge Base
Managed Care•Humana•United Health Care•Harmony•BCBS – Illinois *
Professional Organizations•AAP - National•AAP - Illinois•AMA
Providers•Alliance•Cook County•Advocate *•Northwestern PPG *
Immunization Focused Coalition•Chicago Area Immunization Coalition (CAIC)•Alliance
Registry Organizations•AIRA•CIRSET
States and Regions•Illinois•New York City•Massachusetts•Utah
Key – Presenters, * = not present, but will be in follow-up
26
Implementation Approach – Key PrinciplesBuild on others work – start from knowledge baseBuild under clinical directionWork from scenario and event base
People, process and technologyTest, train, test, train
Implement in digestible chunksBuild for replicationDefine and benchmark key metrics early – build business caseMarry data and event handling quality requirements to solutionsIn the end – add to knowledge base, standards and critical mass …..
11/4/2003
14
27
Immunization Focused Coalition
State DPH/DHS
City/Local DPH
Software Vendors
Public sector providers
National -CDC/CIRSET/AIRA
Private sector providers
Professional Organizations
Karen Austin, BA, HSAImmunization Registry Administrator
28
1. Manual 2. Fax/Phone 3. Dialup 4. Web 5. Integration
Ability to check registry and add data at 1 dedicated workstation per site with dialup by modem
•Ability to access registry wherever there is Internet connection
•HIPAA compliant security
Integration into clinical flow – no separate application
Illinois Immunization Program –Technology Evolution
1999 –Present
2003 - Futureup to 1999 2004 - Future
Fax and voice response –ability to transmit data to registry
1999 –Present
11/4/2003
15
29
Where We Are… and Where We Are Going
Future registryWeb-based applicationComprehensiveDedicated to exchanging immunization information electronically
Current registrySoftware programInstalled on PC at provider siteDependent on provider to share data through modem connection
30
Developed internally at IDPHPrivate provider focus
250+ private provider sitesDatabase contains 100% of the public immunization information
386 WIC/Immunization clinics• Linkage with WIC/IMM system (Cornerstone)
Over 800,000 participants 4 months – 5 years at least 2 immunizations, 74% of eligible participants in the Illinois geopolitical area
TOTS – Tracking Our Toddlers Shots
11/4/2003
16
31
Continued collaborationHL7 complianceDatabase qualityTechnical & program support
Ongoing Efforts
32
Dedicated experienced staffProven functional programDedicated usersSignificant interest in Web-based registry by health care providersStrong collaborative relationships with immunization champions
Successes Celebrated
11/4/2003
17
33
Immunization Focused Coalition
State DPH/DHS
City/LocalDPH
Software Vendors
Public sector providers
National -CDC/CIRSET/AIRA
Private sector providers
Professional Organizations
Maribel Chavez-Torres, MPHImmunization Program Director
Chicago Department of Public Health
34
Chicago Registry Initiatives
Computer Distribution ProjectDownload of Global DataFund Partner Agencies
11/4/2003
18
35
Computer Distribution ProjectStarted in January 2002Purchased 100 computers and printers Process
ApplicationLinkage Agreement signed by CDPH & Provider OfficeForward TOTS application to IDPHInstallation of equipmentQuality control
• Replication activity bi-weekly – sharing data with central registryQuarterly training for new TOTS users
36
Computer Distribution Project
Chicago TOTS Users
16
95
135
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Dec. 01 Dec. 02 Sep. 03
Dec. 01Dec. 02Sep. 03
11/4/2003
19
37
Computer Distribution Project
“Challenges”Practice staff
• Lack of basic computer skills• Staff turnover
Maintenance of equipment• Unexpected equipment problems
38
Download of Global Data
Global = CDPH billing system (Medicaid – non billed and others)
Public Health ClinicsImmunization Walk-in ClinicsCommunity Immunization ClinicsCareVan
3,332 complete participant records downloadedBi-weekly (every two weeks)
11/4/2003
20
39
Working with Community Partners
Fund Partner Agencies7 Delegate Agencies
Registry activitiesCAICAlliance of ChicagoProvider EducationHospital-based Hepatitis B project
40
Immunization Focused Coalition
State DPH/DHS
City/Local DPH
Software Vendors
Public sector providers
National -CDC/CIRSET/AIRA
Private sector providers
Professional Organizations
Mark Leavitt, MD, PhDVice President – Clinical Initiatives
11/4/2003
21
41
Introduction
Current Use/Penetration of EHRsState of the Art in EHREHR/Immunization Registry Relationships: Keys to SuccessEHR/Immunization Registry Interactions:
BasicIntermediateAdvanced
42
Current Use and Penetration of EHRs
Advanced EHR: 5%
Basic EHR: 17%
No EHR: 78%
Advanced EHR: 1%
Basic EHR: 19%Installing: 37%
Planning: 23%No plans: 20%
Acute Care: 1% - 57% of hospitals
Ambulatory Care: 5% - 22% of offices
11/4/2003
22
43
State of the Art in EHR:From Basic to Advanced
Stores encounter notes as textMaintains summary: problems, meds, allergiesManages internal workflows and messagesStructured capture of observations & proceduresProvides decision support, alerts, remindersAccepts HL7 data from external sourcesExports HL7 data to repositories and registriesLinks to external knowledge resourcesPopulation-based reporting and management
= critical capabilities for immunization mgmt
Bas
icAdva
nce
d
44
EHR/Immunization Registry Relationships: Keys to Success
EHR/Registry interaction must......add value--not costs--for the provider...be implementable and supportable with minimal technical resources...simplify workflow--not add steps...deal with privacy and data ownership concerns...reduce--not increase--risk/liability
11/4/2003
23
45
EHR/Registry Interaction:Basic Level
Basic EHR
Registry(web interface)
Registration or pt summary
screen
Patientlook-upscreen
Help fill in reg data?
Vaccinationstatus
report screen
New vaccinationdata entry
screenReturn free text:
vaccination status and new vaccinationdocumentation
Encounternote entry
screen
Complete theencounter note
Low-tech interactions: screen scraping,
keystroke emulation, clipboard copy/paste
46
EHR/Registry Interaction:Intermediate Level
Intermediate EHR
Registry(Web Interface)
Patient ClinicalSummary
Response: a few seconds!
RegistryDatabaseEncounter
Capture Form
Encounternote
documentation
Complete theencounter note
HTTP / XML interactions
Vacc Status Window
Pt Request/Vacc Status Window
RegistryWebAPI
Vacc Proc Window
Vacc Update Window
11/4/2003
24
47
Conceptual Interaction: Logician EHR and iCare
48
EHR/Registry Interaction:Advanced Level
Advanced EHR
Registry(HL7 Interface)
Immunizationview or
flow sheet
Response: a few seconds!
VXQ Vaccination Query
RegistryDatabase
andSecure
NetworkInterfaces
Vaccinationprocedure
capture screen
Encounternote
documentation
Complete theencounter note
HL7 messages
Refresh
VXR Vaccination Record
VXU Update toVaccination
Record
AcknowledgementSend
11/4/2003
25
49
Agenda
1. Vision, People and Process (Brian Bragg)
2. Implementation and Technology (Alex Lippitt)
3. PanelKey Pieces of the Puzzle (Alex Lippitt)
The TOTS / ICARE Registry (Karen Austin)
The City of Chicago (Maribel Chavez-Torres)
View From the Provider….Software Solution, That is (Mark Leavitt)
4. Wrap-up-Next Steps: We Need You (Alex Lippitt)
5. Discussion (Allan Lieberthal)
50
www.eproject.com – Vendor Workgroup, Standards Workgroup
•Knowledge Base – case studies, standards, links, etc.
•Connection Base Directory of Registries, Vendors, success stories, etc.
•Help! – SMEs answer
•Toolkits – Solution Models
11/4/2003
26
51
Connecting With Us –Building the Web
Access to CIRSET Standards and Vendor Workgroup RepositorieseMail
alippitt@alliancechicago.orgdennis.michaud@state.ma.usalean@swpartners.com
52
Other Connect Plenary Sessions That “Connect”
Past…MondayA6 Challenges and Successes of HL7 ConnectionsB8 Practical Connections with the HL7 Standard
1:30 – 3:00 PM TodayC5 The Indian Health Service HL7 Data Exchange Project: Lessons LearnedC9 The Future is Now: Emerging Technologies
11/4/2003
27
53
Attachments
Slides “retired from presentation” but which may be used elsewhere
54
CAIC Mission StatementThe CAIC is a diverse community-focused
coalition of public and private partners whose goal is to improve children’s health by increasing immunization rates in the Chicagoland area with a particular focus on completion of the primary series by age two.
11/4/2003
28
55
CAIC Structure
Provider Education Public Awareness Immunization Registry
CAIC Steering Committee
56
Alliance Immunization Program – Two Thrusts
Ongoing Implementation – All Members
Registry data entryReminder recall
TrainingShift to web application embedded in clinical flow
Long-term1. Elimination of double
entry - integration into EHRS and PMS workflow
2. Tipping point –clinical trust, use of registry
3. Illinois will become opt-out state
11/4/2003
29
57
Important Take-home messagesBuild Deep and WideUse Team Models to Focus StrengthsIntegrate Knowledge To Integrate SolutionsBuild on Past SuccessIdentify The Challenges Early
58
Knowledge Base Build – We Need You
Knowledge Base Beginning – National resource, linking existing knowledgeRegistry directory – standards and interfaceVendor directory – standards and interface, clientsProvider/Registry interface directory – existing, under development, failedOther resources – people, organizations, technical, FAQs, conversation threadsData quality methods, tools and evaluation criteriaStandards, regulatory Model agreements, contractsLinksImplementation toolkits…
Implementation Toolkits – by vendor interface typeExisting toolkits Readiness and QA checklistsWork plan and resource estimatorsBusiness case modelSystem test plan, conditions and sample data for modification
11/4/2003
30
59
Knowledge Base Input
AIRA Abstracts – inventory of articles covering Immunization Registry Business Case (Excel file)SPECIAL ARTICLE – “Standards for Child and Adolescent Immunization Practices”, National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC), Pediatrics Vol. 112 No.4 October 2003
60
Software Company Representative – GE
What do we in the immunization / registry community need to do to make an immunization interface and support functionality viable for EHRS software companies?What should the interface look like in the future – web services, HL7? And where should functionality be distributed between the EHRS, registry, and personal health record management systems?
11/4/2003
31
61
Immunization in Perspective –Support for EHRS
‘Healthcare Home’ eHR
Individual Procedures and Consults – Hospitals, Specialty Clinics, Labs
Population and Holistic Individual Disease Management and Evidence Based Medicine –Registries, Data Warehouses, Measurement Sets, Clinical Practice Guidelines, Formularies (ex: Diabetes, AIDS, Immunization, NEDSS), Timed Interventions
Patient Health Record Management – Subjective input, record keeping, Portals
Other Healthcare Home Integration – Beep, beep….on a planet far, far awayKey – Alliance Focus Areas
62
Addresses New NVAC StandardsStandards for Child and Adolescent Immunization Practices – National Vaccine Advisory Committee
Standards basically apply to adult immunizations as well
17 standards published in the October 2003 issue of Pediatrics. First revision since 1992. Our integration efforts impact these in various ways:
6 standards rely on it for success 6 standards rely on it for success 1.1. 12. Vaccination records for patients are 12. Vaccination records for patients are
accurate, complete and easily accessibleaccurate, complete and easily accessible –Integration across locations, History
8 more are directly addressedThe last 3 are not directly addressed
11/4/2003
32
63
Addresses New NVAC Standards – Availability of Vaccines1. Vaccination services are readily
available2. Vaccinations are coordinated with other
health care services and provided in a medical home when possible – EHRS, PMS, Registry Integration
3. Barriers to vaccination are identified and minimized – scheduling, guidelines
4. Patient costs are minimized - efficiency
64
Addresses New NVAC Standards –Assessment of Vaccination Status
5.5. Health care professionals review the Health care professionals review the vaccination and health status of patients vaccination and health status of patients at every encounter to determine which at every encounter to determine which vaccines are indicatedvaccines are indicated – History, Schedule
6. Health care professionals assess for and follow only medically accepted contraindications – Clinical Guidelines, Entry Validation and Cross-validation
11/4/2003
33
65
Addresses New NVAC Standards –Effective Communication About Vaccine Benefits and Risks
7. Parents/guardians are educated about the benefits and risks of vaccination in a culturally appropriate manner and in easy-to-understand language – Registry and EHRS FAQ, CBT, Knowledge Base
66
Addresses New NVAC Standards – Proper Storage and Administration of Vaccines and Documentation of Vaccines8. Health care professionals follow appropriate procedures for
vaccine storage and handling.9. Up-to-date, written vaccination protocols are accessible at all
locations where vaccines are administered – VIS tracking and electronic forms tied to procedures automatically generated
10. People who administer vaccines and staff who manage or support vaccine administration are knowledgeable and receiving ongoing administration – EHRS and Registry CBT, FQA, Knowledge Base functions
11.11. Health care professionals simultaneously administer as many Health care professionals simultaneously administer as many indicated vaccine doses as possibleindicated vaccine doses as possible – History, Schedule
12.12. Vaccination records for patients are accurate, complete and Vaccination records for patients are accurate, complete and easily accessibleeasily accessible – Integration across locations, History
13.13. Health care professionals report adverse events after Health care professionals report adverse events after vaccination promptly and accurately to VAERS and are aware vaccination promptly and accurately to VAERS and are aware of a separate program, the Vaccine Injury Compensation of a separate program, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP)Program (VICP) – Built in prompting and functionality in registry
14. All personnel who have contact with patients are appropriately vaccinated
11/4/2003
34
67
Addresses New NVAC Standards –Implementation of Strategies to Improve Vaccination Coverage
15.15. Systems are used to remind parents / Systems are used to remind parents / guardians, patients and health care guardians, patients and health care professionals when vaccinations are due and professionals when vaccinations are due and recall those who are overduerecall those who are overdue –reminder/recall facilities in PMS, EHRS and Registry
16.16. OfficeOffice-- or clinicor clinic--based patient record reviews based patient record reviews and vaccination coverage assessments are and vaccination coverage assessments are performed annuallyperformed annually – auto generation of CASA and HEDIS reporting, EHRS patient record validation capabilities.
17. Health care professionals practice community-based procedures – Integration with WIC, Case Management and other
top related