BBA, MBA, and EMBA Program Student Learning Assessment ... 2017 SLAR.pdf · Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program (Common Program Learning Goals and Student Learning
Post on 20-Feb-2020
2 Views
Preview:
Transcript
BBA, MBA, and EMBA Program Student Learning Assessment Report: Fall 2017
2
Contents Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Accounting and Finance ............................................................................................................................................ 12
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in HRM Program ........................................................................................................................................................... 22
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in International Business (“INB”) ................................................................................................................................ 32
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in MIS Program ............................................................................................................................................................. 42
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Marketing (“MKT”) .................................................................................................................................................. 52
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: Master of Business Administration ............................................................................................................................................ 62
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: Executive Master of Business Administration ........................................................................................................................... 73
3
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA Program (Common Program Learning Goals and Student Learning Outcomes for all BBA Disciplines)
Program
Learning Goal
Student Learning
Outcome Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop
1. Communications 1.1 Communicate
ideas and
arguments
effectively
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course Embedded
Assessment (MGT
489, integrative
capstone course group
term projects).
Formative: Course
Embedded
Assessment(MGT 368
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets Expectation: 60%
to 80%; Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation >
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
B.1.1.1.1
See
Figures
BBA
Core 1 –
4.
Target: 80% of students should
meet or exceed expectation.
Students met the target
Trend: Students show an
improving trend in formative
assessment with a significant
increase in percentage of students
exceeding expectation. However in
summative assessment percentage
of students not meeting expectation
is showing an increasing trend.
Department of English and Modern
Languages continued their Discourse
series for students in Fall 2017. Well-
known authors were invited to talk
about writing process and the craft of
writing.
Figure BBA Core- 1 Figure BBA Core- 2
72.83
17.279.91
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 1,SLO 1.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations
59.75
75.86 72.83
18.27
7.5617.27
21.9916.59
9.91
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 1, SLO 1.1; Summative; Trend
4
Figure BBA Core- 3 Figure BBA Core- 4
70
10
20
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA Core PLG 1, SLO 1.1; Fall 2017; Formative
M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations
57.1462.2
70
28.5737.8
1014.29
0
20
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 1, SLO 1.1; Formative; Trend
5
Program
Learning
Goal
Student
Learning
Outcome Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop
2. Critical
Thinking
2.1
Correctly
apply
foundation
knowledge
gained in
BBA core
courses
for
analysis
and
decision
making
Summative: Exit Assessment Test,
and Course Embedded Assessment
(MGT 489, integrative capstone
course group term projects).
Formative: Course Embedded
Assessment from the Disciplines:
FIN 435 group term projects for
A&F students; HRM 480 group
terms projects for HRM students;
INB 480 group term projects for
INB students; MIS 470 group term
projects for MIS students; and
MKT 460 group term projects for
MKT students
Exit Assessment Test: Meets
Expectation: 60% to 80%; Does
Not Meet Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation > 80%
Course-Embedded Assessment:
Rubric # 2.1.1.1 (summative );
A&F.4.R.2 for A&F students,
rubric # HRM.3.R.1 for HRM
students, rubric # INB.2.R.1 for
INB students, rubric #
MIS.2.R.1 for MIS students,
rubric # MKT.1.R.2 for MKT
students (formative)
See Figures
BBA Core 5
– 6.
Please see
the
following
figures for
the
formative
results:
A&F-13,
HRM-9,
INB-5, MIS-
5, MKT-1
Target: 70% students
should meet or exceed
expectations.
Students have met the
target.
Trend: The percentage
of students exceeding
expectation has
decreased over the
period with a slight
increase in percentage
of students not meeting
expectation.
Students are encouraged to take part in
business competitions like Bizmaestros
that provides students the opportunities to
present their creative minds and apply
foundation knowledge gained in academic
courses.
Figure BBA Core- 5 Figure BBA Core- 6
65.39
11.51
23.11
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations
87.37
36.75
65.39
5.360.13
11.517.27
63.14
23.11
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.1; Summative; Trend
6
Program Learning
Goal
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop
2. Critical Thinking 2.2. Engage in
critical thinking and
analysis of business
phenomena to realize
opportunities for
performance
improvement at all
levels
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course Embedded
Assessment (MGT
489, integrative
capstone course
group term projects).
Formative: Course
Embedded
Assessment(MGT
368 group term
projects)
Exit Assessment
Test: Meets
Expectation: 60% to
80%; Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation
> 80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric
# B.2.2.1.1
See
Figures
BBA
Core 7 –
10.
Target: 60% students
should meet or exceed
expectation.
Students met the target
Trend: Students
performance in formative
assessment has improved
over the period with a
sharp increase in
percentage of students
exceeding expectation.
NSU organizes different business
competitions and also encourages students to
take part in external business competitions
like Bizmaestros. These competitions
provide them a platform to present their
creative minds and apply foundation
knowledge gained in academic courses in
real business scenarios.
Figure BBA Core- 7 Figure BBA Core- 8
35.42
18.78
45.81
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.2; Fall 2017; SummativeM = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations
68.21
16.39
35.42
5.640.74
18.7826.16
82.88
45.81
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONP
erce
nta
ge o
f St
ud
ents
BBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.2; Summative; Trend
7
Figure BBA Core- 9 Figure BBA Core- 10
30
20
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.2; Fall 2017; Formative
M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations
85.71
14.63
30
14.29
71.95
20
0
13.41
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 2, SLO 2.2; Formative; Trend
8
Program Learning
Goal
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop
3. Integration 3.1 Utilize knowledge
in the areas of
accounting,
management, finance,
and marketing as
business
professionals.
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (MGT
489, integrative
capstone course,
group term projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded
Assessment(MGT
368 group term
projects)
Exit Assessment
Test: Meets
Expectation 60% to
80%; Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%,
Exceeds Expectation
> 80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric
# 3.1.1.1
See
Figures
BBA
Core 11
– 14.
Target: 80% students
should meet or exceed
expectation.
Students met the target in
formative assessment but
not in summative
assessment.
Trend: Students
performance has
significantly improved in
formative assessment
however performance in
summative assessment has
deteriorated.
A number of seminars and workshops were
organized by several SBE co-curricular
organizations. These seminars and workshops
featured industry leaders and experts. These
events provide key information about the
current business landscapes as well as future
issues.
Figure BBA Core- 11 Figure BBA Core- 12
35.29
26.9
37.82
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 3, SLO 3.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations
62.81
22.34
35.29
0.96
11.23
26.936.24
66.44
37.82
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 3, SLO 3.1; Summative; Trend
9
Figure BBA Core- 13 Figure BBA Core- 14
40
0
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA Core PLG 3, SLO 3.1; Fall 2017; Formative
M = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations
71.43
25.61
40
14.29
62.2
0
14.29 12.2
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 3, SLO 3.1; Formative; Trend
10
Program
Learning
Goal
Student
Learning
Outcome
Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop
3. Integration 3.2 Utilize
the latest
business
tools to
analyze
information,
to improve
productivity
and
decision-
making, and
to achieve
performance
targets
efficiently
Summative: Exit Assessment
Test, and Course-Embedded
Assessment (MGT 489,
integrative capstone course, group
term projects)
Formative: Course Embedded
Assessment from the Disciplines:
FIN 435 group term projects for
A&F students; HRM 480 group
terms projects for HRM students;
INB 480 group term projects for
INB students; MIS 470 group
term projects for MIS students;
and MKT 460 group term projects
for MKT students
Exit Assessment Test: Meets
Expectation: 60% to 80%;
Does Not Meet Expectation <
60%; Exceeds Expectation >
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric # 3.2.1.1
(summative ); A&F.4.R.2 for
A&F students, rubric #
HRM.3.R.1 for HRM
students, rubric # INB.2.R.1
for INB students, rubric #
MIS.2.R.1 for MIS students,
rubric # MKT.1.R.2 for MKT
students (formative)
See Figures
BBA Core
15 – 16.
Please see
the
following
figures for
the
formative
results:
A&F-13,
HRM-9,
INB-5,
MIS-5,
MKT-1
Target: 60% students
should meet or
exceed expectation.
Students met the
target.
Trend: Although
students have met the
target but their
performance has
deteriorated over the
period.
A number of seminars and workshops were
organized by several SBE co-curricular
organizations. These seminars and
workshops featured industry leaders and
experts. These events provide key
information about the current business
landscapes as well as future issues.
Figure BBA Core- 15 Figure BBA Core- 16
39.54
24.99
35.47
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 3, SLO 3.2; Fall 2017; SummativeM = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations
83.01
28.52
39.54
16.99
0.86
24.99
0
70.63
35.47
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 3, SLO 3.2; Summative; Trend
11
Program Learning
Goal
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop
4. Ethics 4.1 Uphold ethical
standards in every
professional practice
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (MGT
489, integrative
capstone course,
group term projects)
Exit Assessment
Test: Meets
Expectation 60% to
80%; Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%,
Exceeds Expectation
> 80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric
# 4.1.1.1
See
Figures
BBA
Core 17 -
18
Target: 80% students should meet or
exceed expectation.
Students failed to meet the target
Trend: There is an increase in
percentage of students not meeting
expectation. This is an area of concern.
NSU Ethics club organizes
different seminars to make
students aware about ethical
standards.
Figure BBA Core- 17 Figure BBA Core- 18
68.25
27.27
4.49
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 4, SLO 4.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM = Meets Expectations, D = Does Not Meet Expectations, E = Exceeds Expectations
93.19
15
68.25
6.81
21.627.27
0
63.41
4.49
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA Core PLG 4, SLO 4.1; Summative; Trend
12
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Accounting and Finance
Figure A&F 1 Figure A&F 2
66.13
9.33
24.55
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in A&F, SLO 1, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
55.51
43.68
66.13
16.11 16.519.33
28.4
39.81
24.55
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in A&F, SLO 1, Summative, Trend
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop
A&F.1. Identify and
classify financial
information; present
and interpret financial
statements
Summative: - Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course Embedded
Assessment (FIN 440,
Capstone Course
group term projects)
Formative: Course
Embedded-
Assessment (FIN 254
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test
Meets Expectation:
60% -80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
A&F.1.R.1
See Figures
A&F 1 – 4.
Target: 80% students should meet or, exceed
expectation.
Students met the target.
Trend: Students performance has improved
over the period.
As a part of standardized syllabus all
students of FIN 440 are given a project that
requires them to work in teams on financial
statements that demonstrates practical
application of income statement, balance
sheet and cash flows. They interpret these
financial statements using appropriate
financial tools.
13
Figure A&F 3 Figure A&F 4
41.56
7.79
50.65
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in A&F, SLO 1, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
65.05
51.3841.56
5.83
16.317.79
29.13 32.31
50.65
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in A&F, SLO 1, Formative, Trend
14
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop
A&F.2. Explain cost
concepts and its
classification and
apply this in
budgeting for specific
business situations.
Summative: - Exit
Assessment Test
Formative: Course-
Embedded
Assessment (ACT
202 examinations)
Exit Assessment Test
Meets Expectation:
60% -80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
A&F.2.R.1
(formative),
A&F.2.R.2
(summative)
See Figures
A&F 5 – 8.
Target: 80% students should meet or, exceed
expectation.
Students met the target.
Trend: Overall students‟ performance in this
area is very impressive with significant
percentage of students exceeding expectation.
Courses have been standardized in terms of
content, sequence of coverage, grading, use
of text book and other learning resources to
ensure students learning outcomes are
achieved.
Figure A&F 5 Figure A&F 6
29.7
1.98
68.32
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in A&F, SLO 2, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
53.08
0
29.7
2.31 0.71 1.98
44.62
99.29
68.32
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONP
erce
nta
ge o
f St
ud
ents
BBA in A&F, SLO 2, Summative, Trend
15
Figure A&F 7 Figure A&F 8
41.56
7.79
50.65
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in A&F, SLO 1, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
65.05
51.3841.56
5.83
16.317.79
29.13 32.31
50.65
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in A&F, SLO 1, Formative, Trend
16
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop
A&F.3. Be able to
apply best investment
strategy by analyzing
various investment
options.
Summative: - Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment
(FIN 440, Capstone
Course, group term
projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded
Assessment (FIN 254
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test
Meets Expectation:
60% -80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
A&F.3.R.1
(formative),
A&F.3.R.2
(summative)
See Figures
A&F 9 – 12.
Target: 80% students should meet or,
exceed expectation.
Student met the target.
Trend: Students performance has improved
over the period.
NSU Finance club organized a financial modeling
competition, Blueprint 3.0 in Fall 2017 that allowed
students to apply their technical financial skills in
practical scenarios.
Figure A&F 9 Figure A&F 10
15.23 17.66
67.12
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in A&F, SLO 3, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
46.71
31.26
15.23 15.23 13.3217.66
38.06
55.42
67.12
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONP
erce
nta
ge o
f St
ud
ents
BBA in A&F, SLO 3, Summative, Trend
17
Figure A&F 11 Figure A&F 12
49.78
6.49
43.72
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in A&F, SLO 3, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
68.63
51.03 49.78
10.46
22.07
6.49
20.9226.9
43.72
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in A&F, SLO 3, Formative, Trend
18
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop
A&F.4. Be able to
calculate and measure
risks and its
application in
portfolio
management.
Summative: - Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment
(FIN 435, Capstone
Course, group term
projects)
Formative: Course
Embedded-
Assessment (FIN 254
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets Expectation:
60% -80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
A&F.4.R.1
(formative),
A&F.4.R.2
(summative)
See Figures
A&F 13 – 16.
Target: 70% students should meet or,
exceed expectation.
Students failed to meet the target in
formative assessment.
Trend: Students performance in summative
assessment has significantly improved over
the period. However performance in
formative assessment is alarming There is a
high jump in the percentage of students not
meeting the expectation. This is an area of
major concern.
The department faculty mentored students in
financial modeling so that they can take part in the
inter university financial modeling competition,
Blueprint 3.0 organized by NSU finance club.
Figure A&F 13 Figure A&F 14
36.58
5.9
57.53
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in A&F, SLO 4, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
45.1
22.75
36.58
12.79
61.53
5.9
42.12
15.73
57.53
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONP
erce
nta
ge o
f St
ud
ents
BBA in A&F, SLO 4, Summative, Trend
19
Figure A&F 15 Figure A&F 16
44.16 45.45
10.39
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in A&F, SLO 4, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
65.36
43.97 44.16
19.6128.34
45.45
15.03
27.69
10.39
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in A&F, SLO 4, Formative, Trend
20
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop
A&F.5. Utilize
technology to analyze
financial information
and to facilitate
accounting and
financial reporting
process.
Summative: - Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment
(FIN 440, Capstone
Course, group term
projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded
Assessment (FIN 254
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets Expectation:
60% -80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
A&F.5.R.1
See Figures A&F 17 –
20.
Target: 80% students should meet or,
exceed expectation.
Students met the target.
Trend: Overall students have shown
good performance in both formative and
summative assessment.
The department emphasizes on the
application of technology in the formative
courses offered by the department.
Figure A&F 17 Figure A&F 18
59.58
16.9223.52
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in A&F, SLO 5, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
47.67
24.38
59.58
13.7 15.21 16.92
38.65
60.42
23.52
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in A&F, SLO 5, Summative, Trend
21
Figure A&F 19 Figure A&F 20
65.8
9.52
24.68
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in A&F, SLO 5, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
69.28
50.71
65.8
7.1914.89
9.52
23.53
34.424.68
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in A&F, SLO 5, Formative, Trend
22
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in HRM Program
Figure HRM 1 Figure HRM 2
10.34
0
89.66
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 1, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100
55.56
10.34
0 0 0 0
44.44
89.66
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 1, Summative, Trend
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation Closing the Loop
1. Understand the
Human Resource
Management concepts
and theories, and is
able to apply these
core knowledge in
managing
organizations.
Summative:
Exit Assessment Test,
and Course
Embedded
Assessment
(HRM480 group term
projects)
Formative:
Course Embedded
Assessment
(MGT351 group term
projects)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets Expectation:
60% to 80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation: <60%
Exceeds Expectation:
>80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment:
Rubric # HRM.1.R.1
See Figures
HRM 1 – 4.
Target: 80% students should meet or exceed
expectation.
Students met the target.
Trend: Overall student performance has
improved over time. We are very pleased
with the results from both formative and
summative assessment as there is an
increase in the percentage of students
exceeding expectation.
Course components are constantly reviewed to
ensure the student learning outcomes are met.
23
Figure HRM 3 Figure HRM 4
27.78
0
72.22
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in HRM, SLO 1, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
11.76
51.43
27.78
0 0 0
88.24
48.57
72.22
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 1, Formative, Trend
24
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation Closing the Loop
2. Understand the
concepts underlying
effective interpersonal
relations and
group/team leadership
skills.
Summative:
Exit Assessment Test,
and Course
Embedded
Assessment
(HRM480 group term
projects)
Formative:
Course Embedded
Assessment (MGT351
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets Expectation:
60% to 80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation: <60%
Exceeds Expectation:
>80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
HRM.2.R.1
See Figures HRM 5 –
8.
Target: 75% students should meet
or exceed expectation.
Students met the target.
Trend: Student performance has
significantly improved over the
period, especially in summative
assessment.
Career and Placement Center
(CPC) of North South University arranged a session
called "Learn to Lead" in collaboration with
Unilever Bangladesh. It was a very informative
session where the HR Director at Unilever
Bangladesh, Mr. Kunal Sharma, spoke about the
Unilever Future Leaders Program and shared tips on
becoming a good leader.
Figure HRM 5 Figure HRM 6
24.14
0
75.86
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 2, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
75
22.22 24.14
0
66.67
0
25
11.11
75.86
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 2, Summative, Trend
25
Figure HRM 7 Figure HRM 8
77.78
0
22.22
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in HRM, SLO 2, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
64.71
37.14
77.78
35.29
11.43
0 0
51.43
22.22
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 2, Formative, Trend
26
Student Learning
Outcomes Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation Closing the Loop
3. Understand and are
able to integrate
Strategic Human
Resource Management
(“SHRM”) concepts in
the context of
management of
organizations.
Summative:
Exit Assessment Test,
and Course
Embedded
Assessment
(HRM480 group term
projects)
Formative:
Course Embedded
Assessment (MGT351
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets Expectation:
60% to 80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation: <60%
Exceeds Expectation:
>80%
Course Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
HRM.3.R.1
See Figures HRM 9 –
12.
Target: 65% students should
meet or exceed expectation.
Students met the target.
Trend: Student performance is
showing a positive trend. In
summative assessment the
percentage of students exceeding
expectation has increased
showing a very positive trend.
Courses have been standardized in terms of content,
sequence of coverage, grading, use of text book and
other learning resources to ensure students learning
outcomes are achieved.
Figure HRM 9 Figure HRM 10
13.79
0
86.21
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 3, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
55
77.78
13.795 7.41
0
40
14.81
86.21
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONP
erce
nta
ge o
f St
ud
ents
BBA in HRM, SLO 3, Summative, Trend
27
Figure HRM 11 Figure HRM 12
55.56
5.56
38.89
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in HRM, SLO 3, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
67.65
20
55.56
11.762.86 5.56
20.59
77.14
38.89
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 3, Formative, Trend
28
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation Closing the Loop
4. Be familiar with the
application of HRM
functional capabilities
to select, recruit,
motivate, and retain
employees.
Summative:
Exit Assessment Test,
and Course
Embedded
Assessment
(HRM480 group term
projects)
Formative:
Course Embedded
Assessment (MGT351
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets Expectation:
60% to 80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation: <60%
Exceeds Expectation:
>80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
HRM.4.R.1
See Figures HRM 13
– 16.
Target: 70% students should meet
or exceed expectation.
Students met the target.
Trend: Students performance has
improved over the period.
In Fall 2017 NSU Human Resource Club hosted the
event “HR Speaks Out 2.0”. The purpose of this
event was to connect aspiring business students
with the illustrious industry representatives so that
the students get familiarized with the contemporary
HR issues and are able to put the theories into
practice. The topics for the discussions were
recruitment, selection and leadership.
Figure HRM 13 Figure HRM 14
96.55
3.450
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 4, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 95
62.96
96.55
0
37.04
3.45 50 0
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 4, Summative, Trend
29
Figure HRM 15 Figure HRM 16
44.44
0
55.56
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in HRM, SLO 4, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
26.47
80
44.44
0 0 0
73.53
20
55.56
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 4, Formative, Trend
30
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation Closing the Loop
5. Demonstrate their
understanding of
compensation practices
and tools of benefit in
the context of
Bangladesh, and are
able to demonstrate
application using
quantitative methods.
Summative:
Exit Assessment Test,
and Course
Embedded
Assessment
(HRM480 group term
projects)
Formative:
Course Embedded
Assessment (MGT351
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets Expectation:
60% to 80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation: <60%
Exceeds Expectation:
>80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
HRM.5.R.1
See Figure HRM 17 –
20.
Target: 60% students should
meet or exceed expectation.
Students met the target.
Trend: Students performance
has improved over the period.
NSU organizes different business competitions and
also encourages students to take part in external
business competitions like Bizmaestros. These
competitions provide them a platform to present
their creative minds and apply foundation
knowledge gained in academic courses in real
business scenarios.
Figure HRM 17 Figure HRM 18
100
0 00
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 5, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
60
25.93
100
40
74.07
0 0 0 00
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 5, Summative, Trend
31
Figure HRM 19 Figure HRM 20
22.22 22.22
55.56
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in HRM, SLO 5, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
44.12
60
22.22
0 0
22.22
55.88
40
55.56
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 Su 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in HRM, SLO 5, Formative, Trend
32
`Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in International Business (“INB”) Student Learning
Outcomes Measure Measurement Criteria Results Status Closing the Loop
1. Demonstrate an
understanding of global
cultural knowledge through
a) the identification of major
components of international
business and b) explanation
of how cultural and national
differences affect the
conduct of business.
Summative- Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (INB 480 group
term projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment (INB
372 case studies)
Exit Assessment Test: Meets
expectations- 60% to 80%,
Does Not Meet expectations-
< 60%, Meets expectations->
80%.
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
INB.1.R.1 (formative), and
rubric # INB.1.R.2
(summative)
See Figures
INB 1 – 4.
Target: 80% of the students should
meet and exceed the expectations
of SLO1.
Students met the target in
formative assessment but failed to
meet the target in summative
assessment.
Trend: Students performance has
deteriorated over the periods in
summative assessment with an
increase in percentage of students
not meeting expectation. This is an
area of concern.
The department uses interactive and
up to date classroom activities that
enhance students‟ participation in the
class.
Figure INB- 1 Figure INB- 2
37.7530.5 31.75
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 1, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
5040 37.75
0
13.34
30.5
50 46.67
31.75
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 1, Summative, Trend
33
Figure INB- 3 Figure INB- 4
52.94
3.92
43.14
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 1, Formative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
47.6237.72
52.94
5.56 4.39 3.92
46.83
57.89
43.14
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 1, Formative, Trend
34
Student Learning
Outcomes Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Status Closing the Loop
2. Demonstrate
working knowledge
in the area of
marketing, finance
and management
from a business
perspective in an
international
context.
Summative: - Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (INB 480
group term projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(INB 372 case studies)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets expectations-
60% to 80%, Does
Not Meet
expectations-< 60/%,
Meets expectations->
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric
# INB.2.R.1
See Figures
INB 5 – 8.
Target: 80% of the students should meet and
exceed the expectations of SLO2.
Students met the target.
Trend: Students performance has improved
over the period in summative assessment.
Interactive assignments and student
presentations on relevant topics, introduction of
new case based assignments have a positive
impact on students‟ performance.
Figure INB- 5 Figure INB- 6
37
0
63
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 2, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
18.75 20
37
0
40
0
81.25
40
63
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 2, Summative, Trend
35
Figure INB- 7 Figure INB- 8
47.52
13.86
38.61
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in INB, SLO 2, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
47.62 49.56 47.52
8.73 5.3113.86
43.65 45.1338.61
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 2, Formative, Trend
36
Student Learning
Outcomes Measure Measurement Criteria Results Status Closing the Loop
3. Assess factors
that determine
international trade
patterns & capital
flows and the impact
of international
institutions on
global business
operations.
Summative- Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (INB 480
group term projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(INB 372 case studies)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets expectations- 60%
to 80%, Does Not Meet
expectations-< 60%, Meets
expectations-> 80%.
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
INB.3.R.1
See Figures
INB 9 – 12.
Target: 80% of the students should
meet and exceed the expectations of
SLO3.
Students met the target.
Trend: Students performance is
positive and consistent over the
periods.
Courses have been standardized in terms of
content, sequence of coverage, grading, use of
text book and other learning resources.
Figure INB- 9 Figure INB- 10
52.75
9.75
37.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 3, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
51.2
16.67
52.75
3.13
13.34 9.75
45.68
70
37.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 3, Summative, Trend
37
Figure INB- 11 Figure INB- 12
54.46
7.92
37.62
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in INB, SLO 3, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
50 50.43 54.46
7.14 7.69 7.92
42.86 41.8837.62
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 3, Formative, Trend
38
Student Learning
Outcomes Measure Measurement Criteria Results Status Closing the Loop
4. Identify the
international
competitiveness of
nations and their
attractiveness for
international
business.
Summative- Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (INB 480
group term projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(INB 372 case studies)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets expectations- 60%
to 80%, Does Not Meet
expectations-< 60%, Meets
expectations-> 80%.
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
INB.4.R.1
See Figures 13
– 16.
Target: 80% of the students should meet
and exceed the expectations of SLO3.
Students met the target.
Trend: Students performance is positive
and consistent over the periods.
The Marketing Club of North South
University (TMC) hosted six interactive
grooming sessions with six different guest
speakers, each being the leader of his/her
professional field. The sessions aimed to
bridge the gap between corporate leaders and
marketing enthusiasts.
Figure INB- 13 Figure INB- 14
67.25
9
23.75
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 4, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
62.26
73.3467.25
0
13.349
37.74
13.34
23.75
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 4, Summative, Trend
39
Figure INB- 15 Figure INB- 16
59.41
9.9
30.69
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in INB, SLO 4, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
59.5252.63
59.41
7.14 7.89 9.9
33.3339.47
30.69
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 4, Formative, Trend
40
Student Learning
Outcomes Measure Measurement Criteria Results Status Closing the Loop
5. Exhibit critical
thinking skills to
ethically address
complex real-world
international
business.
Summative- Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (INB 480
group term projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(INB 372 case studies)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets expectations- 60%
to 80%, Does Not Meet
expectations-< 60%, Meets
expectations-> 80%.
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
INB.5.R.1
See Figures
INB 17 – 20.
Target: 100% of the students should meet and
exceed the expectations of SLO5.
Students failed to meet the target.
Trend: Students performance in summative
assessment has deteriorated over the period with
an increase in percentage of students not meeting
expectation. This is an area of concern.
Courses have been standardized in
terms of content, sequence of coverage,
grading, use of text book and other
learning resources.
Continuation of the use of the software
“Turn it in” in order to ensure
credibility of students work. Workshops
are held for faculties to give them idea
about the software and how to use it.
Figure INB- 17 Figure INB- 18
54
2125
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 5, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
21.88
10
54
17.79
3.34
21
60.34
86.67
25
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 5, Summative, Trend
41
Figure INB- 19 Figure INB- 20xx
54
4
42
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in INB, SLO 5, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
46.8351.75 54
8.733.51 4
44.44 44.74 42
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in INB, SLO 5, Formative, Trend
42
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in MIS Program
Figure MIS 1 Figure MIS 2
43.75
18.75
37.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 1, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
66.67
9.09
43.75
04.55
18.75
33.34 36.37 37.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONP
erce
nta
ge o
f St
ud
ents
BBA in MIS, SLO 1, Summative, Trend
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation Closing the Loop
1. Apply managerial
concepts and decision
theories to use
enterprise information
systems.
Summative:
Exit Assessment Test,
and Course
Embedded
Assessment (MIS470
group term projects)
Formative:
Course Embedded
Assessment (MIS205
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test:
Meets Expectation:
60% to 80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation: <60%
Exceeds Expectation:
>80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MIS.1.R.1
See Figures MIS 1 –
4.
Target: 80% students should meet or
exceed expectation.
Students met the target.
Trend: Although students met the
target performance in summative
assessment has deteriorated with
increase in percentage of students not
meeting expectation.
Up to date business case studies related to
enterprise information systems were practiced in
different MIS courses, so that students are able
to apply these concepts in solving complex
decision problems.
43
Figure MIS 3 Figure MIS 4
50
0
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in MIS, SLO 1, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
66.67
37.5
50
0 0 0
33.33
62.5
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 1, Formative, Trend
44
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation Closing the Loop
2. Demonstrate the
understanding about
systems theory,
systems analysis,
systems design and
project management.
Summative:
Exit Assessment Test,
and Course
Embedded
Assessment (MIS470
group term projects)
Formative:
Course Embedded
Assessment (MIS205
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test
Meets Expectation:
60% to 80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation: <60%
Exceeds Expectation:
>80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MIS.2.R.1
See Figures MIS 5 –
8.
Target: 75% students should meet
or exceed expectation.
Student met the target.
Trend: Although students met the
target performance in summative
assessment has deteriorated with
increase in percentage of students
not meeting expectation
Course components are constantly reviewed to
ensure that students can continue to critically
identify problems and solve those using their
knowledge of business studies.
Figure MIS 5 Figure MIS 6
6.25
18.75
75
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 2, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
50
4.55 6.250
4.55
18.75
5040.91
75
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 2, Summative, Trend
45
Figure MIS 7 Figure MIS 8
40
0
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in MIS, SLO 2, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
50
12.5
40
0 0 0
50
87.5
60
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 2, Formative, Trend
46
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation Closing the Loop
3. Exhibit the
knowledge on web-
based information
systems in business
context.
Summative:
Exit Assessment Test,
and Course
Embedded
Assessment (MIS470
group term projects)
Formative:
Course Embedded
Assessment (MIS205
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test
Meets Expectation:
60% to 80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation: <60%
Exceeds Expectation:
>80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MIS.3.R.1
See
Figures
MIS 9 –
12.
Target: 80% students should meet or exceed
expectation.
Student met the target.
Trend: Students performance has improved over
time
Cases and Laboratory tasks on web-based
information systems (e.g., e-business, e-
commerce) are practiced in the classes of
relevant MIS courses
Figure MIS 9 Figure MIS 10
2518.75
56.25
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 3, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
16.67 13.64
25
50
4.55
18.75
33.34 31.82
56.25
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 3, Summative, Trend
47
Figure MIS 11 Figure MIS 12
50
0
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in MIS, SLO 3, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
33.33
6.25
50
0 0 0
66.67
93.75
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 3, Formative, Trend
48
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation Closing the Loop
4. Develop and
implement
information systems
with the help of latest
business tools.
Summative:
Exit Assessment Test,
and Course
Embedded
Assessment (MIS470
group term projects)
Formative:
Course Embedded
Assessment (MIS205
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test
Meets Expectation:
60% to 80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation: <60%
Exceeds Expectation:
>80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MIS.4.R.1
See
Figures
MIS 13
– 16.
Target: 80% students should meet or exceed
expectation.
Student met the target.
Trend: Students performance has improved
over time
Pre-selected business application tools are used in
building or assessing different Information Systems
in different MIS course-projects.
Figure MIS 13 Figure MIS 14
68.75
6.25
25
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 4, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
0
27.28
68.75
50
18.18
6.25
50
4.55
25
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 4, Summative, Trend
49
Figure MIS 15 Figure MIS 16
40
10
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in MIS, SLO 4, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation 100
18.75
40
0 010
0
81.25
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 4, Formative, Trend
50
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Results Observation Closing the Loop
5. Illustrate the
familiarity about
computer networks
and security concepts.
Summative:
Exit Assessment Test,
and Course
Embedded
Assessment (MIS470
group term projects)
Formative:
Course Embedded
Assessment (MIS205
group term projects)
Exit Assessment Test
Meets Expectation:
60% to 80%
Does Not Meet
Expectation: <60%
Exceeds Expectation:
>80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MIS.5.R.1
See
Figures
MIS 17
– 20.
Target: 80% students should meet or exceed
expectation.
Student met the target.
Trend: Students performance has improved over
time
Along with real world Cases, team activities
and problem solving exercises on „IS privacy,
security, and protective measures‟ were done in
the classes in related MIS courses, so that there
was sufficient coverage on these topics, and
students can identify and solve different
security issues and network threats.
Figure MIS 17 Figure MIS 18
81.25
6.2512.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 5, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
33.34
22.73
81.25
50
4.55 6.25
16.6722.73
12.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 5, Summative, Trend
51
Figure MIS 19 Figure MIS 20
20
10
70
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in MIS, SLO 5, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
50
18.75 20
0 010
50
81.25
70
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in MIS, SLO 5, Formative, Trend
52
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: BBA in Marketing (“MKT”) Student Learning
Outcomes Measure Measurement Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop
1. Demonstrate a thorough
understanding of the
marketing management
process including marketing
strategy formulation and
marketing plan
implementation
Summative- Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (MKT 460
group term projects.)
Formative- Course-
Embedded Assessment
(MKT 337 group term
projects)
Exit Assessment Test: Meets
Expectations- 60% to 80%,
Does Not Meet
Expectations-< 60%,
Exceeds Expectations-> 80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MKT.1.R.1 (formative), and
rubric # MKT.1.R.2
(summative)
See
Figures
MKT 1
– 4.
Target: 75% of the students should
meet and exceed the expectations
of SLO1.
Student met the target.
Trend: Students performance has
improved over time.
The regular lecture-based classes were
augmented via several interactive seminars
and workshops which improved student
understanding of the marketing
management process.
Figure MKT- 1 Figure MKT- 2
44
2.22
53.78
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 1, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
43.74
67.34
44
8.2 7.432.22
48.07
25.24
53.78
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 1, Summative, Trend
53
Figure MKT- 3 Figure MKT- 4
36.36
2.27
61.36
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in Marketing, SLO 1, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
39.66
57.14
36.36
5.17 4.76 2.27
55.17
38.1
61.36
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 1, Formative, Trend
54
Student Learning
Outcomes Measure Measurement Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop
2. Understand the roles of
different areas of Marketing
Communications.
Summative- Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (MKT 460
group term projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(MKT 337 group term
projects)
Exit Assessment Test: Meets
Expectations- 60% to 80%,
Does Not Meet
Expectations-< 60%,
Exceeds expectations-> 80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MKT.2.R.1
See Figures
MKT 5 – 8.
Target: 80% of the students should
meet and exceed the expectations of
SLO2
Students met the target.
Trend: Student performance has
significantly improved over time.
The Marketing Club of North South
University has always tried to build
good communication between
corporate leaders and marketing
enthusiasts. With this goal in mind,
they hosted six interactive grooming
sessions, collectively named
"Elemental,” with six different guest
speakers, each being the leader of
his/her professional field.
Figure MKT- 5 Figure MKT- 6
30
0.67
69.34
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 2, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
53.23
34.8830
3.63 3.81 0.67
43.15
61.3269.34
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 2, Summative, Trend
55
Figure MKT- 7 Figure MKT- 8
22.22
0
77.78
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in Marketing, SLO 2, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
46.55 44.44
22.22
5.17
24.07
0
48.28
31.48
77.78
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 2, Formative, Trend
56
Student Learning
Outcomes Measure Measurement Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop
3. Apply concepts of
consumer behavior to
develop marketing strategy.
Summative: - Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (MKT 460
group term projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(MKT 337 group term
projects)
Exit Assessment Test: Meets
Expectations- 60% to 80%,
Does Not Meet
Expectations-< 60%,
Exceeds Expectations->
80%.
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MKT.3.R.1
See Figures
9 – 12.
Target- 75% of the students
should be able to meet and exceed
the expectation of SLO3.
Students met the target.
Trend: Although students met the
target performance in summative
assessment is showing a negative
trend with an increase in
percentage of students not
meeting expectation.
Three marketing specialists were invited
this semester to equip the participants
with knowledge related to the topic of
“Customer Loyalty & Customer Value
Management”.
Figure MKT- 9 Figure MKT- 10
48.45
14.45
37.11
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 3, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
35.3244.49 48.45
4.880.24
14.45
59.8155.28
37.11
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 3, Summative, Trend
57
Figure MKT- 11 Figure MKT- 12
40
4.44
55.56
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in Marketing, SLO 3, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
43.147.37
40
6.9 7.02 4.44
5045.61
55.56
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 3, Formative, Trend
58
Student Learning
Outcomes Measure Measurement Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop
4. Demonstrate skills to
critically analyze a problem,
design and implement
appropriate solutions.
Summative: - Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (MKT 460
group term projects)
Formative:- Course-
Embedded Assessment
(MKT 337 group term
projects)
Exit Assessment Test: Meets
Expectations- 60% to 80%,
Does Not Meet
Expectations-< 60%,
Exceeds Expectations-> 80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MKT.4.R.1 (formative), and
rubric # MKT.4.R.2
(summative)
See
Figures 13
– 16.
Target- 80% of the
students should be able
to meet and exceed the
expectation of SLO4.
Students met the target.
Trend: Student
performance is
improving over time.
Final year students of MKT 460, Strategic
Marketing, were immersed in an hour-long lecture
on Innovation, conducted by Mr. Subhajit Mandol,
Director, LumenLab of MetLife Innovation
Centre, Singapore. The students benefitted
immensely from the experience of connecting with
an industry expert.
Figure MKT- 13 Figure MKT- 14
66
7.34
26.67
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 4, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
41.87
76.12
66
5.63 3.5 7.34
52.5
20.426.67
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 4, Summative, Trend
59
Figure MKT- 15 Figure MKT- 16
35.56
8.89
55.56
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in Marketing, SLO 4, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
37.9332.14 35.56
13.79 10.71 8.89
48.2857.14 55.56
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 4, Formative, Trend
60
Student Learning
Outcomes Measure Measurement Criteria Results Observation(s) Closing the Loop
5. Practice and set examples
on responsible and ethical
marketing.
Summative: Exit Assessment
Test, and Course-Embedded
Assessment (MKT 460
group term projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(MKT 337 group term
projects)
Exit Assessment Test: Meets
Expectations- 60% to 80%,
Does Not Meet expectations-
< 60%, Exceeds
Expectations-> 80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MKT.5.R.1
See Figure 17
– 20.
Target- 100% of the students
should be able to meet and
exceed the expectation of
SLO5.
Students met the target
Trend: Although students
could not meet the target there
is an improving trend in the
student performance.
Marketing and International Business
Department conducted a workshop titled
“Measuring Performance Management &
Marketing in Business Environment” as
part of the Awareness Building Workshop
in Fall 2017. The workshop was
facilitated by Mr. Md. Arif Uddin,
Director, Head of Business Performance
Management, Grameenphone Ltd. and
Mr. Golam Mortuza Chowdhury, Deputy
Director, Head of Revenue Assurance &
Fraud Management, Grameenphone Ltd.
Figure MKT- 17 Figure MKT- 18
25.56
5.78
68.67
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 5, Summative, Fall 2017M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
22.11
59.54
25.56
3.82 1.185.78
74.08
39.29
68.67
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 5, Summative, Trend
61
Figure MKT- 19 Figure MKT- 20
51.11
4.44
44.44
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
tsBBA in Marketing, SLO 5, Formative, Fall 2017
M = Meets Expectation, D = Does Not Meet Expectation, E = Exceeds Expectation
50
33.93
51.11
12.075.36 4.44
37.93
60.71
44.44
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEEDS EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
of
Stu
den
ts
BBA in Marketing, SLO 5, Formative, Trend
62
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: Master of Business Administration
Program
Learning Goal
Student
Learning
Outcome Measure Measurement Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop
1. Managerial
Communications
1.1 Communicate
effectively
toward
achieving
managerial
objectives.
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test,
and Course-
Embedded
Assessment (BUS
690 final term
projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded
Assessment (BUS
650 final term
projects)
Assessment Tests: Meets
Expectation: 60% -80%; Does
Not Meet Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation> 80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MB.1.1.1.1
See
Figures
MBA- 1
through
MBA-4
Target: 80% students should meet or, exceed
expectation.
Students failed to meet the target in the
summative assessment.
Trend: Students performance in summative
assessment is a major area of concern. There
is an increase in percentage of students not
meeting the expectation.
Department of English and
Modern Languages arranged
a Colloquium series for the
students. Well-known
Bangladeshi authors were
invited to talk about writing
process and the craft of
writing.
Figure MBA - 1 Figure MBA - 2
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
MBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation
43.18
61.91
52.56
20.9
34.0941.19
35.92
4 6.25
0
20
40
60
80
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Summative; Trend
63
Figure MBA - 3 Figure MBA - 4
100
0 00
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Fall 2017; FormativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations
55.5666.67
100
0 0 0
44.4433.33
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Formative; Trend
64
Program
Learning Goal
Student
Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop
2. Critical
Thinking and
Decision
Making
2.1 Apply
appropriate
analytic
framework to
solving
management
problems, and
developing of
integrative
managerial
solutions.
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (BUS 690
final term projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(BUS 650 final term
projects)
Assessment Tests: Meets
Expectation: 60% -80%;
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MB.2.1.1.1
See
Figures
MBA-5
through
MBA-8
Target: 80% students should meet
or, exceed expectation.
Students failed to meet the target in
the summative assessment.
Trend: Student performance in
summative assessment is very
poor. This is a major area of
concern as the students are
consistently failing to meet the
target.
NSU has taken significant steps
towards improving students learning
experience. These include
establishing a Business Advisory
Board, arranging MoU with the
Foreign Ministry, updating its
curriculum to an international
standard, equipping the CPC office,
engaging with the EHS+ Center, and
creating other offices of excellence
for closer engagement with different
industries.
Figure MBA - 5 Figure MBA - 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation
51.45
39.57
51.53
37.25
46.43 47.94
11.314
0.530
20
40
60
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Summative; Trend
65
Figure MBA - 7 Figure MBA - 8
93.75
06.25
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Fall 2017; FormativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations
55.56
66.67
93.75
0 0 0
44.44
33.33
6.25
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Formative; Trend
66
Program
Learning Goal
Student
Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop
2. Critical
Thinking and
Decision
Making
2.2 Determine
relevant
decision
criteria and
alternatives,
and identify
the optimal
solution
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (BUS 690
final term projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(BUS 650 final term
projects)
Assessment Tests: Meets
Expectation: 60% -80%;
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MB.2.1.1.1
See
Figures
MBA-9
through
MBA-12
Target: 80% students should meet
or, exceed expectation.
Students failed to meet the target
in the summative assessment.
Trend: Students failed to meet
the target in summative
assessment. The percentage of
students not meeting target is
increasing. This is an area of
significant concern
NSU has taken significant steps
towards improving students learning
experience. This include establishing a
Business Advisory Board, arranging
MoU with the Foreign Ministry,
updating its curriculum to an
international standard, equipping the
CPC office, engaging with the EHS+
Center, and creating other offices of
excellence for closer engagement with
different industries.
Figure MBA - 9 Figure MBA - 10
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation
54.48 54.7849.93
39.27
31.22
50.07
6.25
14
00
20
40
60
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Summative; Trend
67
Figure MBA - 11 Figure MBA - 12
100
0 00
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Fall 2017; FormativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations
55.5666.67
100
0 0 0
44.4433.33
00
20
40
60
80
100
120
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Formative; Trend
68
Program
Learning Goal Student Learning Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop
3. Integration of
management
tools and
techniques
3.1 Integrate and apply the tools
and techniques of
management, drawing on a
broad-based knowledge of
the major functions
(accounting, economics,
finance, information
systems, marketing,
operations management, and
strategy) to solve complex
management problems and
render sound business
decisions.
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (BUS
690 final term
projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded
Assessment (BUS
650 final term
projects)
Assessment Tests:
Meets
Expectation: 60%
-80%; Does Not
Meet Expectation
< 60%; Exceeds
Expectation> 80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment:
Rubric #
MB.3.1.1.1
See
Figures
MBA-13
through
MBA-16
Target: 80% students should
meet or, exceed expectation.
Students failed to meet the target
in the summative assessment.
Trend: Student performance in
summative assessment is very
poor. This is a major area of
concern as the students are
consistently failing to meet the
target
North South University held
“Career Fair 2017” to welcome
notable organizations from all over
the country and give its students an
opportunity to understand what the
job market is looking for.
Figure MBA - 13 Figure MBA - 14
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
MBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation
57.5150.78
60.77
32.7 35.22 36.1
9.7914
3.13
0
20
40
60
80
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Summative; Trend
69
Figure MBA - 15 Figure MBA - 16
87.5
0
12.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Fall 2017; FormativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations
55.56
66.67
87.5
0 0 0
44.44
33.33
12.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Formative; Trend
70
Program
Learning Goal
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop
4. Global
Perspectives
4.1 Augment
business
decisions with
global
considerations.
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (BUS 690
final term projects)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(BUS 685 final term
projects)
Assessment Tests: Meets
Expectation: 60% -80%;
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MB.4.1.1.1
See
Figures
MBA-17
through
MBA-20
Target: 80% students
should meet or, exceed
expectation.
Students failed to meet the
target in the summative
assessment.
Trend: Performance in
summative assessment is
very poor.
Career and Placement Center (CPC) in
collaboration with Unilever Bangladesh
arranged a session called "Learn to Lead" In
where the HR Director (Kunal Sharma)
spoke about the Unilever Future Leaders
Program. This event was very informative
for both faculty and students.
Figure MBA - 17 Figure MBA - 18
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
MBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation
41.16
50.26
68.75
33.3329.57 27.53 25.51
20.17
3.72
0
20
40
60
80
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATIONP
erce
nta
ges
of
Stu
den
ts
MBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Summative; Trend
71
Figure MBA - 19 Figure MBA - 20
71.43
0
28.57
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Fall 2017; FormativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations
40
62.5
71.43
10
0 0
50
37.5
28.57
0
20
40
60
80
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
MBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Formative; Trend
72
Program
Learning Goal
Student
Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop
5. Ethical
Considerations
5.1 Evaluate and
articulate
ethical
considerations
in managerial
decision
making and in
enterprise
management.
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test, and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (BUS 690
final term projects)
Assessment Tests: Meets
Expectation: 60% -80%;
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
MB.5.1.1.1
See
Figures
MBA-21
and
MBA-22
Target: 80% students
should meet or, exceed
expectation.
Students failed to meet the
target.
Trend: Student
performance is extremely
poor in this area. It is a
matter of great concern
NSU Ethics club organizes different seminars
to make students aware about ethical
standards.
Courses are also designed to include ethical
standards in managerial decision making and
in enterprise management
Figure MBA - 21 Figure MBA - 22
Fall 2017 Student Learning Assessment Report: Executive Master of Business Administration
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
MBA PLG 5; SLO 5.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation
23.11
47.0450
45.64
38.96
50
31.25
14
00
20
40
60
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATIONP
erce
nta
ges
of
Stu
den
ts
MBA PLG 5; SLO 5.1; Summative; Trend
73
Program
Learning Goal
Student
Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 1. Managerial
Communications
1.1 Communicate
effectively
toward
achieving
managerial
objectives.
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (EMB
690 final term project)
Formative: Course-
Embedded
Assessment (EMB
650 final term project)
Assessment Tests Meets
Expectation: 60% -80%;
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
EM.1.1.1.1
See
Figures
EMBA –
1 through
EMBA -
4
Target: 80% students should
meet or, exceed expectation.
Students met the target in
formative assessment but
failed to meet it in summative
assessment.
Trend: Student performance
in summative assessment has
deteriorated over the period.
This is an area of concern.
NSU organizes different events and
encourages students to participate in
different business competitions so that
they learn how to communicate
effectively to achieve a business goal.
Figure EMBA - 1 Figure EMBA - 2
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
EMBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation
53.26
81.48
68.59
14.957.41
27.5631.79
11.113.85
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATIONP
erce
nta
ges
of
Stu
den
ts
EMBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Summative; Trend
74
Figure EMBA - 3 Figure EMBA - 4
87.5
0
12.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Fall 2017; FormativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations
85.71 88.89 87.5
0 0 0
14.29 11.11 12.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 1; SLO 1.1; Formative; Trend
75
Program
Learning Goal
Student
Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Critical
Thinking and
Decision
Making
2.1 Apply
appropriate
analytic
framework to
solving
management
problems, and
developing of
integrative
managerial
solutions.
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (EMB 690
final term project)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(EMB 650 final term
project)
Assessment Tests Meets
Expectation: 60% -80%;
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
EM.2.1.1.1
See
Figures
EMBA –
5 through
EMBA -
8
Target: 80% students should
meet or, exceed expectation.
Students failed to meet the
target in the summative
assessment.
Trend: Performance in
summative assessment is
very poor with a high
percentage of students not
meeting expectation.
Students are encouraged to take part in
different business competitions that provide
them the opportunities to present their
creative minds and apply foundation
knowledge gained in academic courses.
Figure EMBA - 5 Figure EMBA - 6
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation
60.0556.48
61.67
14.95
41.6738.33
25
1.85 00
20
40
60
80
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Summative; Trend
76
Figure EMBA - 7 Figure EMBA - 8
100
0 00
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Fall 2017; FormativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations
85.71 88.89100
0 0 0
14.29 11.110
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.1; Formative; Trend
77
Program
Learning Goal
Student
Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 2. Critical
Thinking and
Decision
Making
2.2 Determine
relevant
decision
criteria and
alternatives,
and identify
the optimal
solution.
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (EMB 690
final term project)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(EMB 650 final term
project)
Assessment Tests Meets
Expectation: 60% -80%;
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
EM.2.1.1.1
See
Figures
EMBA –
9 through
EMBA -
12
Target: 80% students should
meet or, exceed expectation.
Students failed to meet the
target in the summative
assessment.
Trend: Performance in
summative assessment is
very poor with an increase in
percentage of students not
meeting expectation.
Students are encouraged to take part in
different business competitions that
provide them the opportunities to present
their creative minds and apply foundation
knowledge gained in academic courses.
Figure EMBA - 9 Figure EMBA - 10
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation
31.79
65.74
56.67
6.25
30.56
43.33
61.96
3.70
0
20
40
60
80
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Summative; Trend
78
Figure EMBA - 11 Figure EMBA - 12
100
0 00
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Fall 2017; FormativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations
85.71 88.89100
0 0 0
14.29 11.110
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 2; SLO 2.2; Formative; Trend
79
Program
Learning Goal
Student Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 3. Integration of
management
tools and
techniques
3.1 Integrate and apply the
tools and techniques of
management, drawing
on a broad-based
knowledge of the major
functions (accounting,
economics, finance,
information systems,
marketing, operations
management, and
strategy) to solve
complex management
problems and render
sound business
decisions.
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test
and Course-
Embedded
Assessment
(EMB 690 final
term project)
Formative:
Course-
Embedded
Assessment
(EMB 650 final
term project)
Assessment Tests
Meets
Expectation: 60%
-80%; Does Not
Meet Expectation
< 60%; Exceeds
Expectation> 80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment:
Rubric #
EM.3.1.1.1
See Figures
EMBA – 13
through
EMBA - 16
Target: 80% students should
meet or, exceed expectation.
Students failed to meet the
target in the summative
assessment.
Trend: Performance in
summative assessment is very
poor with high percentage of
students not meeting
expectation. However,
performance has improved over
the period. This is still an area
of major concern.
Courses have been standardized in terms
of content, sequence of coverage,
grading, use of text book and other
learning resources.
Figure EMBA - 13 Figure EMBA - 14
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
EMBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation
72.83
16.67
60
14.67
83.33
40
12.5
0 00
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Summative; Trend
80
Figure EMBA - 15 Figure EMBA - 16
87.5
0
12.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Fall 2017; FormativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations
85.71 88.89 87.5
0 0 0
14.29 11.11 12.5
0
20
40
60
80
100
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 3; SLO 3.1; Formative; Trend
81
Program
Learning Goal
Student
Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 4. Global
Perspective
4.1 Augment
business
decisions with
global
considerations.
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (EMB 690
final term project)
Formative: Course-
Embedded Assessment
(EMB 670 final term
project)
Assessment Tests Meets
Expectation: 60% -80%;
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
EM.4.1.1.1
See
Figures
EMBA –
17
through
EMBA -
20
Target: 80% students
should meet or, exceed
expectation.
Students failed to meet the
target in the summative
assessment.
Trend: Student
performance in summative
assessment is very poor and
is an area of high concern.
Career and Placement Center (CPC) in
collaboration with Unilever Bangladesh
arranged a session called "Learn to Lead" In
where the HR Director (Kunal Sharma)
spoke about the Unilever Future Leaders
Program. This event was very informative
for both faculty and students.
Figure EMBA - 17 Figure EMBA - 18
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
EMBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation
72.83
28.7
65
8.42
46.3
2518.75
25
10
0
20
40
60
80
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATIONP
erce
nta
ges
of
Stu
den
ts
EMBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Summative; Trend
82
Figure EMBA - 19 Figure EMBA - 20
33.33
16.67
50
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Fall 2017; FormativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expecations
50 50
33.33
50
16.67 16.67
0
33.33
50
0
20
40
60
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 4; SLO 4.1; Formative; Trend
83
Program
Learning Goal
Student
Learning
Outcome Measure
Measurement
Criteria Result Observation(s) Closing the Loop 5. Ethical
considerations
5.1 Evaluate and
articulate ethical
considerations in
managerial
decision making
and in enterprise
management.
Summative: Exit
Assessment Test and
Course-Embedded
Assessment (EMB 690
final term project)
Assessment Tests Meets
Expectation: 60% -80%;
Does Not Meet
Expectation < 60%;
Exceeds Expectation>
80%
Course-Embedded
Assessment: Rubric #
EM.5.1.1.1
See
Figures
EMBA -
21 and
EMBA -
22
Target: 80% students should
meet or, exceed expectation
Students failed to meet the
target
Trend: Student‟s performance
is poor in this area with a high
percentage of students not
meeting expectation.
NSU Ethics club organizes different
seminars to make students aware about
ethical standards.
Figure EMBA - 21 Figure EMBA - 22
0
20
40
60
80
100
M D E
EMBA PLG 5; SLO 5.1; Fall 2017; SummativeM=Meets Expectation, D=Does Not Meet Expectation, E=Exceeds Expectation
68.7562.04 60
6.25
37.96
25 25
0
15
0
20
40
60
80
2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SU 2017 FA 2017 SP 2017 SP 2017 SP
MEETS EXPECTATION DOES NOT MEET EXPECTATION
EXCEED EXPECTATION
Per
cen
tage
s o
f St
ud
ents
EMBA PLG 5; SLO 5.1; Summative; Trend
84
top related