Bark & co solicitors
Post on 09-May-2015
348 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Transcript
Bark & Co
Solicitors
B A R K & C O S O L I C I T O R S LO N D O N N E W S M E T P O L I C E R E V I E W D A N I E L M O R G A N M U R D E R
O V E R N E W S O F T H E W O R L D L I N K , B A R K & C O S O L I C I T O R S LO N D O N , F R E D B U N N , B A R K A N D C O S O L I C I T O R S LO N D O N , G I L E S B A R K J O N E S
It is reported that the Met Police will now investigate
a News of The World link concerning the Daniel
Morgan Murder (R v Vian & Others).Details reported
[here] in the Guardian
Mr Glen Vian, represented by Bark & Co, was
acquitted in March 2011.Fred Bunn has been
instructed by Glenn Vian since the mid-2008. Not
guilty verdicts were entered against MrVian and the
other defendants, following complex and fiercely
fought challenges to the Crown’s case during
protracted pre-trial legal argument.
The initial investigation into the murder of
Daniel Morgan in 1987 was deeply flawed, and
many compelling leads were not pursued
properly or, in some cases, at all. The level of
public resources expended in this most recent
investigation is simply breathtaking. The Police
bought the house next door to Mr Vian, in
order to conduct thousands of hours of
intrusive covert surveillance upon him and his
family.
They released false stories to the press in an effort to
trigger incriminating conversations. When these efforts
failed to produce any cogent evidence, a case was built
against these defendants using “Supergrass” witnesses,
and considerably flawed Serious Organized Crime &
Police Act (SOCPA) agreements. It will come as no
surprise to right thinking people to learn that those of
the worst character, facing many years in custody for
crimes including drug trafficking and attempted
murder, will say anything in order to secure a massive
reduction in their sentence and/or substantial financial
benefits.
The position is very much worse where, as in this
case, a SOCPA witness is told in advance what the
case theory is, and simply has to repeat it to gain his
reward. The defense has, in the course of pre-trial
legal arguments, been able to discredit the Crown’s
case so that, one by one, the evidence of these
witnesses has been excluded by the trial Judge or
abandoned by the Crown.
The recent legal arguments which preceded the collapse of the
case were led by our defense team, based on a document found
in the unused material by a solicitor of this firm.
top related