Transcript
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy
Corporate Entrepreneurship
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy
Student: Arthur WillemsANR: S801275
Teacher: Stijn van den Hoogen
Word Count: 6640
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Management SummaryIn this thesis a research to how multinational corporations can successfully leverage
corporate entrepreneurship is described. Corporate entrepreneurship includes radical
product innovation, risk taking, and proactiveness. It also includes business venturing
and "intrapreneuring” and organizational renewal.
Firstly the two dimensions of corporate entrepreneurship will be clarified, innovation
aimed at business creation and venturing, and strategic renewal. Innovation aimed at
business creation and venturing is a two-fold view. Innovation refers to creating and
introducing new products, production processes, and organizational systems. While
companies have a lot of difficulties creating value from innovations, some companies see
possibilities to turn to corporate venturing. Corporate venturing is the process of creating
new business in either existing markets where the company already competes, or new
markets. Corporate venturing involves entrepreneurial efforts in which established
business organizations invest in and/or create new businesses. Strategic
entrepreneurship has been defined as involving the identification and exploitation of
opportunities, while simultaneously creating and sustaining a competitive advantage. It
may involve strategic renewal, sustained regeneration, domain redefinition,
organizational rejuvenation, and business model reconstruction. Four domains which
clarify the natural integration between entrepreneurship and strategic management are
explained. These domains are external networks, resources and organizational learning,
innovation, and internationalization.
Next the characteristics which multinational corporations need to possess are described,
following the four earlier dimensions and the different managerial capacities needed at
senior-level, middle-level and first-level management. Management should always
consider the dangers ahead in the process of corporate entrepreneurship and consider six
important areas in the process.
The proposed problem statement is answered using a model from earlier research.
2
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Table of ContentsManagement Summary ............................................................................................................... 2 Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ 3 Chapter 1 - Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4
1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Problem Indication ............................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Problem Statement ............................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Research Questions ........................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Data collection and research design .................................................................................. 6 1.6 Thesis Structure ................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Dimensions of Corporate Entrepreneurship ...................................................................... 7
2.2.1 Innovation and Corporate Venturing ......................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Strategic Renewal ...................................................................................................... 9
2.3 Summary ......................................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 3 - Organizational and Managerial Capabilities .......................................................... 14
3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 14 3.2 Organizational Capabilities ............................................................................................. 14
3.2.1 External Networks .................................................................................................... 14 3.2.2 Resources and Organizational Learning .................................................................. 17 3.2.3 Innovation ................................................................................................................ 19 3.2.4 Internationalization .................................................................................................. 20
3.3 Managerial Capabilities .................................................................................................. 21 3.4 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 24 4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 25 4.2 A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship .......................................................................... 25
4.2.1 Entrepreneurial Mindset ........................................................................................... 25 4.2.2 Entrepreneurial Culture and Entrepreneurial Leadership ........................................ 26 4.2.3. Strategic Management of Resources ....................................................................... 26 4.2.4 Applying Creativity to Develop Innovations ........................................................... 27
4.3 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 27 Chapter 5- Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 28
5.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 28 5.2 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 28 5.3 Further Recommendations and Limitations .................................................................... 30
3
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Chapter 1 - Introduction
1.1 IntroductionAs our economic climate is changing as a consequence of the credit crunch organizations
are seeking new ways to find competitive advantages. Organizations are constantly
trying to innovate faster than its best competitors. Essentially, this capacity is about
identifying new ways of doing business, developing new technologies and products, and
entering new markets in new organizational forms (Teng, 2007).
This thesis is written for the course Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy at Tilburg
University in the Netherlands. This first chapter contains the problem indication and the
problem statement. To answer the problem statement two research questions are
formulated. Furthermore, the research design and data collection will be considered
followed by the structure of the paper.
1.2 Problem IndicationWhile there is a broadly held belief in the need for and inherent value of entrepreneurial
actions on the part of established organizations (Morris et al., 2008), much remains to be
understood about how corporate entrepreneurship as a strategy is enacted in
organizational settings (Hornsby et al., 2009).
A longstanding literature has highlighted significant challenges and shortcomings in the
corporate entrepreneurship activities of firms. Previous reviews have emphasized the
need for further research on the processes and knowledge-based resources involved in
corporate entrepreneurship, as well as the heterogeneous nature of corporate
entrepreneurship. The scope of corporate entrepreneurship is also becoming wider as
organizations, not previously recognized as entrepreneurial, need to become so in order
to survive and succeed in increasingly competitive and financially constrained
environments. This raises important questions concerning the applicability of the
structures and processes developed in traditional corporations to these new contexts and
how the appropriate strategies and mechanisms can be developed. Another motivation
concerns the need for understanding the link between corporate entrepreneurship and
4
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
corporate governance, in part because corporate entrepreneurship activities can be costly
and have significant impact on the future value of the enterprise (Phan et al., 2009).
1.3 Problem StatementFor this thesis the following problem statement will be researched:
• How can multinational corporations successfully leverage corporate
entrepreneurship?
Multinational corporations are corporations with subsidiaries in foreign countries. In the
multinational corporations´ field, it is recognized that subsidiaries may not be merely
subordinate elements of their parent multinational corporations. Instead they can be
examined as networks of autonomous and differentiated units (Boojihawon et al, 2007).
The choice of multinational corporations is not only for the international aspects of these
corporations, but also considering the size. Multinational corporations tend to be large
and divided into multiple subsidiaries. In his article, Zahra (1996) defines corporate
entrepreneurship using definitions from various studied. Zahra states that corporate
entrepreneurship includes radical product innovation, risk taking, and proactiveness. It
also includes business venturing and "intrapreneuring" and organizational renewal. A
review of the literature by Guth and Ginsberg (1990) concluded that corporate
entrepreneurship has two dimensions: innovation aimed at business creation and
venturing, and strategic renewal. These activities are often collectively called corporate
entrepreneurship, which can be defined as ‘the sum of a company’s innovation, renewal,
and venturing efforts’
1.4 Research QuestionsTo find an answer to the problem statement this research will use the following research
questions:
• What dimensions are typical for corporate entrepreneurship?
• What organizational and managerial capabilities do multinational corporations
need to possess or incorporate to facilitate corporate entrepreneurship?
5
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
1.5 Data collection and research designThe thesis will be based on an exploratory research. The research is secondary and
available research literature and data will be reviewed where possible.
Data and research literature used in this thesis is published in major academic journals.
These are, among others:
• Journal of Business Venturing
• Journal of Small Business Management
• Journal of Management
• Journal of Management Studies
• Organization Studies
• Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice
• Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal
• Small Business Economics
• Entrepreneurship and Regional Development
• Research Policy
• Academy of Management Journal
The university library search engine is used to search in these academic journals. Key
words used for the search are corporate entrepreneurship, multinational corporation,
managerial entrepreneurship, innovation, strategic entrepreneurship and corporate
venturing.
1.6 Thesis StructureThe second chapter of this thesis researches the characteristics of corporate
entrepreneurship. The third chapter researches the organizational and managerial
capabilities which multinational corporations’ need to possess. The fourth chapter consist
of a model of the strategic aspects of corporate entrepreneurship. Chapter five is the
conclusion and further recommendations.
6
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Chapter 2 – Corporate Entrepreneurship Dimensions
2.1 IntroductionAs stated in the first chapter, this thesis uses Zahra’s definition of corporate
entrepreneurship. Zahra (1996) states that corporate entrepreneurship includes radical
product innovation, risk taking, and pro-activeness. It also includes business venturing
and "intrapreneuring” and organizational renewal. This chapter will further explore the
definition of corporate entrepreneurship by explaining the dimensions of corporate
entrepreneurship. This will lead to the answer to the first research question:
What dimensions are typical for corporate entrepreneurship?
2.2 Dimensions of Corporate EntrepreneurshipZahra’s definition is supported by many other researchers. Phan, Wright, Ucbasaran and
Tan (2009) state that corporate entrepreneurship refers to the process of organizational
renewal and relates to two distinct but related phenomena, corporate venturing and
strategic entrepreneurship. Guth and Ginsberg (1990) concluded that corporate
entrepreneurship has two dimensions: innovation aimed at business creation and
venturing, and strategic renewal. To understand corporate entrepreneurship these two
dimensions will be further clarified in the next part of the thesis.
2.2.1 Innovation and Corporate VenturingTeng (2007) states that innovation refers to creating and introducing new products,
production processes, and organizational systems. Antoncic and Hirsch (2001) stated two
fundamental concepts for corporate venturing, objectives focused on rejuvenating or
purposefully redefining organizations, markets and industries to create or sustain a
position of competitive superiority, and innovation as the premier mechanism for meeting
these objectives. Clearly, innovation is one of the most important backbones for
corporate venturing. Nevertheless, there are some fundamental problems which could
harm the process of innovation and corporate venturing. In his research, Gompers
(2002) states that corporate internal investments in innovative activities, including
research and development, have often been maligned for their ineffectiveness. Gompers
7
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
states that over the past forty years, organizations have attempted to capture the value
from waves of technology and innovation. However, during much of this time, these
organizations realized that young, nimble start-ups saw possibilities to capitalize on
opportunities that the corporations saw first.
It seems that corporations always had some difficulties bringing innovations to the
market. A lot of visions and concepts have been wasted over time. Reasons of this
phenomena are either because of internal resistance (for example, from managers who
did not want to see a product launched that competed with one of their offerings) or an
inability to execute on the initial insight. Traditionally, corporations try to encourage
innovations by investing in research and design (R&D) laboratories. Nevertheless, there
is evidence that investments in conventional R&D laboratories are not able to create the
expected returns. Researchers in conventional R&D laboratories have focused on
incremental product advances or on academic ideas with little relevance to the
corporation. Even worse, sometimes when R&D laboratories managed to think up an
innovative idea, all to often this idea is commercialised by other organizations.
Corporations nowadays are turning into corporate venturing. Corporate venturing is the
process of creating new business in either existing markets where the company already
competes, or new markets. Corporate venturing involves entrepreneurial efforts in which
established business organizations invest in and/or create new businesses (Sharma &
Chrisman, 1999). Narayanan, Yang and Zahra (2009) state that corporate venturing
focuses on the various steps and processes associated with creating new businesses and
integrating them into the firm's overall business portfolio. It is a strategy for business
development and involves investment in high-risk activities that generate new businesses
within or closely related to the activities of the parent corporation. Corporate venturing
can be used strategically to encourage corporate renewal in the parent organization, as a
growth driver by investing in ventures with high growth potential, or to diversify the core
8
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
business of the parent by investing in ventures in diverse industries (Hustes and
Vintergaard, 2004).
2.2.2 Strategic RenewalThe second dimension of corporate entrepreneurship is strategic renewal. Strategic
renewal contains al renewal activities that enhance a corporations' ability to compete and
take risks, which may or may not involve the addition of new businesses to a corporation
(Phan, Wright, Ucbasaran and Tan, 2009). This dimension is also described as strategic
entrepreneurship in previous research.
Phan et al (200) define strategic renewal as the process of identification and exploitation
of opportunities, while simultaneously creating and sustaining a competitive advantage.
It may involve strategic renewal, sustained regeneration, domain redefinition,
organizational rejuvenation, and business model reconstruction. Basically, strategic
entrepreneurship is a concept which contains all entrepreneurial actions with a strategic
perspective within an organization.
To further understand the concept of strategic renewal, the linkage between
entrepreneurship and strategic management is an essential element. Hitt and Ireland
(2000) define four domains in which they explain the natural integration between
entrepreneurship and strategic management. These domains are external networks,
resources and organizational learning, innovation, and internationalization.
• External Networks: In a changing competitive landscape, the importance of
external networks is becoming clear for corporations. Corporations are not alone
in the competitive landscape; they are only part of the value chain. The external
network of a corporation consists of relationships with customers, suppliers, and
competitors among others and often extends across industry, geographic,
9
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
political, and cultural boundaries (Hitt et al, 2000). But how can external networks
help in creating strategic renewal? Phan et al (2009) state that the importance of
external networks for corporations is because external networks can provide firms
with access to information, resources, markets and even, at times, technologies.
External networks provide corporations with credibility and legitimacy. Further,
potential opportunities can be identified by using external networks. But according
to Hitt et al (2000), the greatest value of networks for entrepreneurial firms is the
provision of resources and capabilities needed to compete effectively in the
marketplace.
External Networks are valuable for the corporation because they create
possibilities of learning new capabilities and competing in new markets without
possessing al the necessary resources to normally undertake these steps.
Corporations which typically profit most from external networks to learn new
capabilities or compete in new markets are new ventures. New venture firms
normally have limited resources and can benefit from establishing alliances and
developing these alliances into an effective network (Hitt et al, 2000). Lee, Lee
and Pennings (2001) confirm this statement in their research. Lee et al use the
term entrepreneurial orientation to define the organizational processes, methods
and styles which new ventures use to implement their founding strategy. The
external network is an important part of the founding strategy. The study
researched linkages between the new venture companies and different
relationships in the external networks and the effects of these linkages to the
internal capabilities. The results showed the strongest interaction effect of the
linkage between the new venture and venture capital companies. Venture capital
companies invest equity in new ventures and therefore have a very strong
incentive to help the new venture succeed. Venture capital companies do not only
provide financial resources, but also managerial skills. Other linkages which
10
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
effected the internal capabilities where found with other enterprises, with
universities and research institutes and with venture associations.
• Resources and Organizational Learning: Hitt, Ireland, Camp and Sexton
(2001) state that knowledge is generated through organizational learning.
Learning new capabilities helps firms to compete effectively, survive, and grow.
But consequently there is always the danger of a changing landscape in which the
corporations resides. In a changing landscape the value of a corporations’ current
resources and knowledge can reduce in its value. As a result, the corporation
needs to learn new knowledge to adapt to the new situation and effectively
compete in the new environment.
One of the resources associated with organizational learning is human capital or
the employees’ capabilities. Hitt et al (2001) found evidence that the transfer of
knowledge within a corporation creates human capital and aids to higher firm
performance. Also, the firm’s human capital will be used to implement strategies
that in turn enhance performance as well.
Elkjaer (2004) defined three types of organizational learning. The first two types
are derived from earlier literature and the third is developed by Elkjaer herself.
The first type of organizational learning is defined as the individual skills and
knowledge acquisition in organizations as systems. The second type is the ability
to learn while participating in communities of practice. So, a learning organization
is to be created on the basis of the individual employees' ability to think of the
organization as a set of systems. The third type of organizational learning is
defined as the development of experience and knowledge by inquiry (or reflective
thinking) in social worlds held together by commitment. By introducing a third
type of organizational learning, Elkjaer adds a new dimension to the concept.
Historically, individuals and organizations are researched to study the effect of
organizational learning. Elkjaer adds the dimension of events and situations to the
11
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
equation. By adopting such an implication it is possible to trace why for example
an organizational development project does not succeed - not by pointing at
individuals' failures but by acknowledging that individuals and organizations
constitute each other in a continuous process individuals and groups act or do not
act and the organization reacts or does not react in subtle ways that can be
explored by following the event or situation in time and space (Elkjaer, 2004).
• Innovation: As described earlier, innovation is one of the dimensions of
corporate venturing. Hitt and Ireland discuss the effect of innovation on strategic
renewal. Hamel (2000) even names innovation the most important component of
a firms’ strategy. In his study, Hamel executed a survey of approximately 500
chief executive officers. Most of the chief executive officers agreed that their
industry had changed in the last 10 year. The reason of this change was
innovation by newcomers, not by the incumbent corporations. The chief executive
officers largely agreed that the new venture corporations changed the rules and
the landscapes. Hamel concludes that the real story of Silicon Valley is not e-
commerce, but innovation.
There is a strong relationship between innovation and the first two domains of
strategic renewal, external networks and resources and organizational learning.
Corporations which are able to use the knowledge acquired from partners can
achieve a differential technological advantage. Zahra, Ireland and Hitt (2000)
argued that firms with greater dimensions and speed of technological learning
achieved higher levels of performance. These results suggest that firms can
employ strong innovative capabilities to implement entrepreneurial strategies and
thereby create wealth.
12
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
• Internationalization: Since the end of last century and continuing throughout
this century, the competitive landscape is changing. Hitt et al (2001) show
evidence of internationalization as the primary driver of the changing landscape.
The number of economic transactions across country borders is growing and will
continue to do so. Increasing internationalization creates more complexity of
doing business, but also creates new opportunities for entrepreneurs. To manage
the complex transactions and interactions in global markets, entrepreneurs are
obligated to develop a global mindset. Hitt et al (2001) argue that the
opportunities available, the simplification of international transactions by new
technologies, and the opening of international markets all led to an increasing
number of smaller, entrepreneurial businesses entering international markets.
2.3 SummaryThis chapter explains the first research questions by looking at the dimensions of
corporate entrepreneurship. The dimensions defined by previous research are innovation
and corporate venturing, and strategic renewal. Innovation and corporate venturing is
the process of creating and introducing new products, production processes, and
organizational systems. Strategic renewal or strategic entrepreneurship is the integration
of entrepreneurial and strategic perspectives in developing and taking actions designed
to create wealth. The concept is further explained by using Hitt and Irelands four
domains of strategic renewal. The domains are external networks, resources and
organizational learning, innovation, and internationalization.
13
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Chapter 3 - Organizational and Managerial Capabilities
3.1 IntroductionChapter 2 described the dimensions of corporate entrepreneurship. In this chapter the
organizational and managerial capacities multi-national corporations need to possess to
successfully facilitate corporate entrepreneurship are researched. This will be researched
following the four domains of strategic renewal and the managerial capabilities an
organization need to possess. In this chapter the second research question will be
answered:
What organizational and managerial capabilities do multinational corporations need to
possess or incorporate to facilitate corporate entrepreneurship?
3.2 Organizational CapabilitiesThe research question consists of two parts, the organizational capabilities needed and
the managerial capabilities needed by multinational corporations to incorporate or
facilitate corporate entrepreneurship. The organizational capabilities will be explained
following the dimensions of strategic renewal explained in chapter 2. This will not only
focus on strategic renewal, but also new venturing and innovation.
3.2.1 External NetworksAs discussed in chapter 2, external networks are essential to the discovery of
opportunities, to the testing of ideas, and to gather resources for the creation of the new
organization. Firms such as Cisco and Motorola have created extensive alliance portfolios,
forming 50 to 100 new alliances each year, while the Dutch electronics and medical
equipment firm Philips is currently engaged in over 1,000 alliances. However, evidence
shows that alliance failure rates are generally high, ranging from 40 to 70%, thus
displaying a ‘mix of promise and peril’ (Koen, Elko and Jeffrey, 2009). The multinational
corporation need to possess the capabilities to understand the external network and the
different linkages to find successful linkages with external parties. Lee, Lee and Pennings
(2001) define partnership-based linkages with external actors as cooperative bilateral
relationships with environmental constituents. Lee et al differentiate between four types
14
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
of linkages, with other enterprises, with venture capitalists, with universities and
research institutes and with venture associations.
• Strategic alliances with other enterprises consist of long-term relationship
with suppliers, customers and other corporations with complementary resources.
Lee et al (2001) describe two ways in which these strategic alliances can provide
better performance in technological start-ups.
First, new ventures can find lacking financial, technical and managerial resources
through links with incumbent (developed) firms.
Second, strategic alliances can aid new ventures in receiving financial, technical
and managerial resources from third parties through the signalling role of the
alliance. Holders of the resources will generally be more willing to provide the
financial, technical and managerial resources to the new venture.
• Linkages with venture capitalists provide financial resources and managerial
knowledge. Naturally, venture capitalists with an interest in the new venture have
an incentive to make the start-up succeed. Ways of providing managerial
knowledge to new ventures are having a seat on the board of directors, create
access to professionals, and initiate change at the management board when the
start-up does not meet the expectations of the venture capitalist.
Chang (2004) studied the linkage between internet start-ups and venture
capitalists. His study showed that there are four factors influencing the speed in
which internet start-ups had initial public offerings: the reputations of the venture
capital firms from which they raised funds, the amount of money these start-ups
raised, the reputations of strategic alliance partners, and the number of strategic
15
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
alliances they developed.
• Linkages with universities and research institutes provide technological
knowledge which the new venture does not process, and could not have
accomplished without help. Universities and research institutes provide
consultancy and education for professionals. Students who participate in the start-
up will become familiar with the technology and will be inclined towards starting
their career at the new venture (Lee et al, 2001).
Stuart, Ozdemir and Ding (2007) state that in the past few decades, universities
have become much more proactive in their commercialization efforts. They found
evidence that many universities diverge of their traditional mission of educating
students and advancing understanding to have broadened to include patenting
and commercializing research discoveries. Stuart et al studied the sector of
biotechnology firms. They found that biotechnology firms with prominent and
well-networked academic founders and scientific advisors are more likely to enter
formal alliances with universities and biotechnology firms with more upstream,
university contracts are more frequent participants in downstream,
commercialization alliances. This resulted in evidence that these firms with strong
academic connections (and not necessarily with academic founders) have the
organizational capabilities and business model to capitalize university technology.
• Linkages with venture associations create an informal network which is very
useful for further accumulating social capital. The network becomes a channel of
referral and will provide access to other professionals such as lawyers, bankers,
marketers and accountants (lee et al, 2001).
16
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
To fully exploit the possibilities created by external networks, the new venture must
possess an open culture. The corporation needs to be able to differentiate the four types
of linkages and develop the relationships.
As an organization becomes large and more established, it is increasingly difficult to
develop new networks. Most well-functioning organizations are better suited for more
familiar activities building on current businesses. Attempts to pave new paths for
information exchange and knowledge sharing will conflict with the organization's
institutionalized environment (Kelley, Peters, O’Conner, 2009).
3.2.2 Resources and Organizational LearningIn chapter 2 the three ways of organizational learning are introduced. These three ways
are the individual skills and knowledge acquisition in organizations as systems, the ability
to learn while participating in communities of practice and the development of experience
and knowledge by inquiry (or reflective thinking) in social worlds held together by
commitment (Elkjaer, 2004). Another typology for organizational learning is described by
Dess, Ireland, Zahra, Floyd, Janney and Lane (2003). To exploit the advantages from
organizational learning corporations must be able to see the difference between the
different types of organizational learning.
First, technical knowledge is concerned with insights about the properties of specific
activities, is vital to sustained regeneration and results primarily from acquisitive
learning. Second, firm-specific and predominately tacit in nature, it is a product of how
the firm has learned to creatively and uniquely combine its idiosyncratic resources and
capabilities to create value. Third, exploitative knowledge accumulates as the firm learns
how to exploit its resources. Thus, exploitative knowledge expands as the firm learns
how to creatively find unique, value-creating ways to exploit its technical and integrative
knowledge sets (Dess et al, 2003).
17
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Dess et al (2003) state that to gain maximum benefit from organizational learning a
different emphasis on the different types of knowledge is needed. If a new venture uses
technical knowledge, the implementation focus is on leveraging knowledge. Nevertheless,
rearranging and extending knowledge is the result from the corporation applying its new
integrative knowledge. Lastly, the corporation imports new technical and integrative
knowledge into value-creating primary and support activities when trying to effectively
use its new exploitative knowledge.
Popper and Lipshitz (1998) researched organizational learning using a structural and
cultural approach. The research focuses on the question: Can organizational learning be
treated as an extension of individual learning? They introduce anthropomorphism into the
research of organizational learning. Anthropomorphism is the attribution of human form
or qualities to nonhuman entities. To realize anthropomorphism, an organization should
have cognitive systems in place that enable them to perceive, think, and so on, which are
similar to those possessed by individuals.
These organizational learning mechanisms are the structural aspect of organizational
learning. The organizational learning mechanisms are institutionalized structural and
procedural arrangements that allow organizations to systematically collect, analyze store,
disseminate and use information relevant to the performance of the organization and its
members (Popper et al, 1998).
The cultural aspect of organizational learning is defined as a normative system of shared
values and beliefs that shape how organization members feel, think and behave.
Productive organizational learning requires a learning culture that includes five values:
continuous learning, valid information, transparency, issue orientation and accountability
(Popper et al, 1998). These 5 values are further explained below.
18
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
• Continuous learning is at the heart of the organization and vital for surviving.
• Valid information is the governing value of organizational learning.
Organizational learning involves the transformation of data into knowledge and
therefore it is vital that full, undistorted and verifiable information is used in the
learning process.
• Transparency is the willingness to hold oneself open to inspection in order to
receive valid feedback. The importance of transparency becomes clear when
individuals realize that an information environment is mostly produced by people
rather than being given by nature.
• Issue orientation becomes apparent when expressed opinions and assertions
are valued according to their merits, divorced from the identity and status of the
individual pronouncing them.
• Accountability is the responsibility individuals take for their actions and their
consequences and for the learning from these consequences.
3.2.3 InnovationAs discussed in chapter 2, innovation is often a difficult process in large multinational
corporations. Conventional research and development laboratories are not able to create
the expected returns. Researchers in conventional R&D laboratories have focused on
incremental product advances or on academic ideas with little relevance to the
corporation. Even worse, sometimes when R&D laboratories managed to think up an
innovative idea, all too often this idea is commercialised by other organizations.
Corporate venturing needs a critical population of ideas and certain requirements in the
quality and innovativeness of these ideas (Husted and Vintergaard, 2004).
19
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Dess et al (2003) discuss in their research that innovative proposals are frequently
defeated by financial control systems and other formalities that are typical of large
bureaucracies. According to Dess et al. (2003) corporate entrepreneurship often fails
because large organizations present hostile environments for creative ideas.
Gompers (2002) researched the success of venture investments by an analysis of
innovation by comparing corporate venturing and independent venturing. Gompers found
that corporate venture investments in innovation are significantly more successful than
other investments.
3.2.4 InternationalizationInternational entrepreneurship is a combination of innovative, proactive, and risk seeking
behaviours that crosses national borders and is intended to create value in organizations
(McDougall and Oviatt, 2005). Dess et al (2003) state that the interaction between
corporate entrepreneurship and internationalization is an important research opportunity.
They state that managers and researchers should give much attention to the firm’s
entrepreneurial activities that shape these firms’ product portfolios and differentiate them
from the competition.
In a changing global environment chief executive officers and professionals should be
able to gain new insights into the dynamic interaction between the internationalization
process and corporate entrepreneurship as a way of creating new competencies that
enable firms to enhance firm performance. To take advantage of this dynamic interaction
corporations should be able to create and gain knowledge that can be combined or
deployed to renew existing skills and knowledge while creating and honouring new ones
(Zahra, Nielsen and Bogner, 1999). According to Dess et al. (2003), the development
and acquisition of skills creates strategic entrepreneurship, a process that usually
demands creativity.
20
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
McDougall et al (2005) researched the speed of entrepreneurial internationalization.
There are our forces which determine the speed of internationalization, enabling,
motivating, mediating and moderating. The first, enabling, makes accelerated
internationalization feasible. Faster and more efficient transportation among multiple
foreign countries has a positive effect on the costs for foreign trade and investment. The
costs of airline transportation of people and freight have declined over the last decades.
Computers, faxes and wireless technologies have made sharing of data and information
faster and cheaper. The second force, motivating, is the existence of competition. The
existence of competition encourages and force entrepreneurs into internationalization.
Many entrepreneurs have been motivated to take pre-emptive advantage of technological
opportunities in foreign countries because they feared competitors would respond quickly
to a new product introduction and prevent them from eventually going international if
they initially competed only in their home country (McDougall et al, 2005). The third
force, mediating, refers to the entrepreneurial actor. The person or group that discovers
or enacts an opportunity is central to the dynamics of international exploitation.
According to McDougall et al (2005), accelerated or retarded international
entrepreneurial behaviour cannot be explained through some objective measure of
technology and competition, but only by understanding how the opportunity, the enabling
forces, and the motivating forces are interpreted, or mediated, by the entrepreneurial
actor. The fourth and last force, mediating, consists of two types. After an
entrepreneurial actor discovers or enacts an opportunity and interprets the enabling and
the motivating forces, then the knowledge-intensity of the opportunity combined with the
know-how already available to the entrepreneurial actor, plus the characteristics of the
entrepreneur’s international network largely determine internationalization speed.
Therefore, we view these as two types of moderating forces (McDougall et al, 2005).
3.3 Managerial CapabilitiesManagerial capabilities to seize the advantages of corporate entrepreneurship are
different on the different levels of managerial level. The managerial levels used in this
21
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
thesis are senior-level management, middle-level management and first-level
management.
Hornsby, Kuratko, Shepherd and Bott (2009) researched that senior-level managers have
ratifying, recognizing, and directing roles which are in turn, are associated with particular
managerial actions. In examining the role of middle-level managers, Hornsbey et al
(2009) state that middle-level managers endorse, refine, and shepherd entrepreneurial
opportunities and identify, acquire, and deploy resources needed to pursue those
opportunities. Whereas first-level managers have experimenting roles corresponding to
the competence definition sub-process, adjusting roles
corresponding to the competence modification sub-process, and conforming roles
corresponding to the competence deployment sub-process (Hornsbey et al, 2009).
Heavy, Simsek, Roche and Kelly (2009) conclude that uncertainty due to decision-
makers’ lack of timely awareness of what opportunities to pursue, as well as a sense of
doubt surrounding the feasibility and desirability of those opportunities, shroud
entrepreneurial acts.
Gompers (2002) stated that the chances of success of corporate entrepreneurship is
influenced by strategic fit, market knowledge, resources and the way a corporation
approaches its venture program. Unsuccessful venture programs mostly fail because
managers made two fatal mistakes. Firstly, managers fail to create consensus inside the
organisation about the program’s objectives and its potential outcomes and benefits to
the organization. Secondly, the managers fail to build relationships and establish
credibility outside the corporation.
According to Husted and Vintergaard (2004), there are six areas managers need to
consider regarding corporate entrepreneurship:
22
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
• Take responsibility: Companies cannot be passive; rather they need to take
active part in creating the bases from which ideas can spring. These actions
should be focused both on encouragement of employees and on engagement in
sources of innovation outside the organization. Therefore, parent companies need
to take responsibility for knowledge production in networks and in the process of
conceptualizing knowledge (Husted and Vintergaard, 2004).
• Secure access: Companies need to be active in securing access in networks by
offering their own level of knowledge, production capabilities or reputation in
return. In industries where knowledge is crucial, companies must be experts in
both in-house research and in cooperative research with external partners, such
as university scientists, research hospitals, and skilled competitors (Husted and
Vintergaard, 2004).
• Network capabilities: Companies need to learn to interact and create networks
in order to be able to manage the venture base. The ability to create and
participate in a network and to contextualize one’s knowledge should be viewed as
something that can be learned, but also something that often depends on
personal traits (Husted and Vintergaard, 2004).
• Competencies in how to influence the vision and agendas in knowledge-
creating networks: An organization must be able to influence the vision and
agenda of a network by learning where and how to access or structure a network
formation and a community for contextualization (Husted and Vintergaard, 2004).
• Contextualization: In order to shape the venture base during the process of
contextualization, there are strong demands on the company to disseminate and
23
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
negotiate new knowledge to a wide range of stakeholders. These types of
stakeholder must hold central positions and originate from a transdisciplinary
background (Husted and Vintergaard, 2004).
• Invite to discussion at an early stage: A common error in the phases of
building a venture base is that the process of contextualization occurs too late in
the development. As a consequence, the final business proposal will receive a
lower evaluation due to both a lack of quality and a lack of appropriateness.
Therefore, corporations must overcome the traditional paradigm of ‘‘knowledge
hoarding’’ and create new methods and incentives for knowledge sharing. Even
though knowledge sharing is a necessity for the venture base to develop,
knowledge-sharing hostility both at individual and organizational levels hampers
such development (Husted and Vintergaard, 2004).
3.4 ConclusionIn this chapter the different capabilities which multinational corporations need to possess
are discussed following the four domains of strategic renewal. The conclusion is that a
multinational organization should be open and aware of the different relationships,
knowledge and internationalization processes are present. Managerial capabilities are
different between levels within the organization. Furthermore, managers should be well
aware of the gaps lying ahead and be aware of the capabilities an organization needs to
possess to successfully engage in corporate entrepreneurship.
24
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Chapter 4 – A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship
4.1 IntroductionIn this chapter, the model constructed by Ireland, Hitt and Sirmon (2003) will be used to
further explain the strategic aspect of corporate entrepreneurship. This wil hlp to form
the conclusion in the next chapter.
4.2 A Model of Strategic EntrepreneurshipIreland, Hitt and Sirmon (2003) developed a model of strategic entrepreneurship. This
model describes how an entrepreneurial mindset, an entrepreneurial culture and
entrepreneurial leadership, the strategic management of resources and applying
creativity to develop innovations are important dimensions of strategic entrepreneurship
and how these dimensions facilitate the creation of wealth in an organization. See figure
1 for the links between these dimensions.
Figure 1. A model of strategic entrepreneurship.
4.2.1 Entrepreneurial MindsetAccording to Ireland et al (2003), an entrepreneurial mindset is required to successfully
engage in strategic entrepreneurship. An entrepreneurial mindset is both an
individualistic and collective phenomenon. Ireland et al (2003) explain that an
entrepreneurial mindset is very important to individual entrepreneurs as well as to
managers and employees in established firms to think and act entrepreneurially. They
state that an entrepreneurial mindset is a view on doing business focused on and
capturing the benefits of uncertainty. Uncertainty derives from an inability to properly
assess future events, largely because of a lack of information about cause/effect
relationships.
25
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
4.2.2 Entrepreneurial Culture and Entrepreneurial LeadershipEntrepreneurial culture is a system of shared values and beliefs that shape the firm’s
structural arrangements and its members’ actions to produce behavioural norms (Ireland
et al, 2003). Ireland et al (2003) define six properties of behavioural norms:
• Shared basic assumptions.
• Invented, discovered, or developed by a given group.
• Ability to cope with problems of external adaptation and internal integration.
• The assumptions are considered valid.
• They can be taught to new members of the group.
• The assumptions are the correct way to perceive, think, and feel in relation to
those problems.
Ireland et al (2003) define entrepreneurial leadership as the ability to influence others to
manage resources strategically in order to emphasize both opportunity-seeking and
advantage-seeking behaviours.
4.2.3. Strategic Management of ResourcesResearch has shown that resources are the basis of firm differential performances in
terms of wealth creation. Ireland et al (2003) define three critical resources to be
managed in strategic entrepreneurship. One, financial capital, is a tangible asset while
the other two, human capital and social capital, are intangible assets.
• Financial Capital: Financial capital refers to assets that are considered to be
liquid in nature. A capital asset of this type can be used to make purchases of
various goods and services or to acquire other types of assets (tangible or
intangible).
• Human Capital: Human Capital is the total of skills and knowledge within the
organization. As stated previously in chapter 3, a firm can leverage its human
26
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
capital by engaging in external networks.
• Social Capital: Social capital is the set of relationships between individuals
(internal social capital) and between individuals and organizations (external social
capital) that facilitate action (Ireland et al, 2009).
These resources need to be bundled and the corporation need to make choices about
how to leverage these bundles within the organization.
4.2.4 Applying Creativity to Develop InnovationsIreland et al (2003) state that to gain a sustainable advantage need to apply creativity in
a way that helps incumbent companies earn higher margins by selling better products to
their best customers.
4.3 ConclusionIn this chapter the model created by Ireland, Hitt and Sirmon (2003) is used to show
how corporate entrepreneurship can create wealth for multinational corporations. When
organization bundle and leverage the capabilities described in chapter 3, the model can
be used to provide a framework in how to leverage and divide the capabilities between
subsidiaries.
27
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Chapter 5- Conclusion
5.1 IntroductionIn the former chapters the concept of strategic entrepreneurship has been researched
using the dimensions of corporate entrepreneurship, the organizational and managerial
capabilities needed by the organisation to successful leverage corporate entrepreneurship
and the strategic aspects within a model by Ireland et al. In this chapter a conclusion of
the research and further recommendation will be given.
5.2 ConclusionIn this conclusion there is one central goal and that is the answer to the problem
statement proposed in the first chapter.
• How can multinational corporations successfully leverage corporate
entrepreneurship?
As became clear in this study there are a lot of aspects which need to be considered in
corporate entrepreneurship. In order to fully leverage the successes belonging to
corporate entrepreneurship this research found that there are important aspects which
multinational corporations need to incorporate.
To get to an answer to the problem statement two research question where formulated:
• What dimensions are typical for corporate entrepreneurship?
• What organizational and managerial capabilities do multinational corporations
need to possess or incorporate to facilitate corporate entrepreneurship?
The dimensions of corporate entrepreneurship are innovation aimed at business creation
and venturing, and strategic renewal. Innovation and corporate venturing is the process
of creating and introducing new products, production processes, and organizational
systems. Strategic renewal or strategic entrepreneurship is the integration of
entrepreneurial and strategic perspectives in developing and taking actions designed to
create wealth. The concept is further explained by using four domains of strategic
28
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
renewal. The domains are external networks, resources and organizational learning,
innovation, and internationalization.
The managerial and organizational capabilities which the corporation needs to posses are
detailed in chapter three using the dimensions of chapter 2. Linking these with the model
of strategic entrepreneurship in chapter 4 adds to the conclusion below. This conclusion
answers the problem statement of this research.
An entrepreneurial mindset needs to be adopted. This is both an individualistic and
collective phenomenon and should incur in both the management levels as the other
employees. Adopting an entrepreneurial mindset is a cultural aspect and should focus on
the learning aspect of entrepreneurship. It should focus on continuous learning, valid
information, transparency, issue orientation and accountability. Focussing on these
aspects will have a positive affect on uncertainty. The entrepreneurial culture should
have shared values and beliefs. This process should be under leadership of an
entrepreneurial leader who understands the factors which could lead to negative
outcomes. The two most important reasons are failing to create consensus inside the
organisation about the program’s objectives and its potential outcomes and benefits to
the organization and failing to build relationships and establish credibility outside the
corporation. The entrepreneurial leader should have the ability to influence others to
manage resources strategically in order to emphasize both opportunity-seeking and
advantage-seeking behaviours.
Furthermore the corporation should fully understand the external networks of the
organization. Not only should the corporation be able to see the value of the different
linkages, but it should also be able to act as an important player within the external
networks. To become an important player, the corporation should be fully aware of the
six focus points of the external network, taking responsibilities, securing access, network
29
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
capabilities, influencing opportunities, contextualization and being part of the discussion
at an early stage.
Multinational corporations should be aware of the internationalization aspect of
entrepreneurship. There are our forces which determine the speed of internationalization,
enabling, motivating, mediating and moderating.
5.3 Further Recommendations and LimitationsThis research is purely descriptive and based on former research and literature. To
further expand the research the empirical method could be used. Data could be added
from interviews and from performance indicators. This could result in a new framework
which could be used to set a strategy for corporate entrepreneurship.
Furthermore, this research is based on large multinational corporations. There could be
differences in corporate entrepreneurship between corporations in different fields or
markets. For example, a corporation in a fast-moving high tech market could have
different aspects and different outcomes than a corporation in a saturated adult market.
It is also interesting to further target the senior-level management and research
differences in the composition of the board, the complementary and conflicting aspects
with middle-level management or personal aspects of individual managers
30
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Chapter 6 – References
Antoncic B. and Hisrich R.D., (2001) Intrapreneurship: construct refinement and cross-
cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing. 16, 495–527.
Barringer, B.R., Bluedorn, A.C., (1999). The relationship between corporate
entrepreneurship and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal. 20(5), 421-
444
Boojihawon, D.K., Dimitratos, P., Young, S. (2007). Characteristics and influences of
multinational subsidiary entrepreneurial culture: The case of the advertising sector.
5(10), 549-572
Chang, S.J., (2004) Venture capital financing, strategic alliances, and the initial public
offerings of Internet startups, Journal of business venturing, 19(5), 721-741
Dess, G.G., Ireland, R.D., Zahra, S.A., Floyd, S.W., Janney, J.J., Lane, P.J., (2003).
Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 351–378
Elkjaer, B. (2004). Organizational learning: The ‘third way’. Management learning : the
international journal for managerial and organizational learning and development, 35(4),
419-434
Gompers, P.A. (2002). Corporations and the financing of innovation: The corporate
venturing experience. Economic Review – Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, 87(4), 1-17
Guth, W., Ginsberg, A., (1990). Guest editors’ Introduction: Corporate entrepreneurship.
Strategic Management Journal, 11, 5–15
Hamel G. (2000). Leading the Revolution. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
31
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Heavey, C., Simsek, Z., Roche, F., Kelly, A., (2009), Decision Comprehensiveness and
Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderating Role of Managerial Uncertainty Preferences
and Environmental Dynamism. Journal of Management Studies. 46(8), 1289-1314
Hitt MA, Ireland RD. (2000). The intersection of entrepreneurship and strategic
management research. In Handbook of Entrepreneurship. Sexton DL, Landstrom HA
(eds.). Blackwell: Oxford, 45–63
Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M., Sexton, D.L. (2001). Guest Editors' Introduction to
the Special Issue: Strategic Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Strategies for Wealth
Creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 479-492
Hitt, M.A., Ireland, R.D., Camp, S.M., Sexton, D.L. (2001). Integrating entrepreneurship
actions and strategic management actions to create firm wealth. Academy of
Management Executive 15(1), 49–63
Hornsby, J.S., Kuratko, D.F., Shepherd, D.A., Bott, J.P. (2009). Managers' corporate
entrepreneurial actions: Examining perception and position. Journal of Business
Venturing. 24(3), 236-247
Husted K., Vintergaard C. (2004) Stimulating innovation through corporate venturing
bases. Journal of World Business, 39, 296-306
Ireland, R.D., Hitt, M.A., Sirmon, D.G. (2003). A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship:
The Construct and its Dimensions. Journal of management. 6(12), 963-989
Kelley, D.J., Peters, L., O'Connor, G.C. (2009) Intra-organizational networking for
innovation-based corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of business venturing. 3(5), 221-
235
32
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Lee, C., Lee, K., Pennings, J.M. (2001). Internal Capabilities, External Networks, and
Performance: A Study on Technology-based Ventures. Strategic management journal.
22(6-7), 615-640
McDougall, P.P., Oviatt, B.M. (2005) Defining International Entrepreneurship and
Modeling the Speed of Internationalization. Entrepreneurship theory and practice 29(5)
537-554
Narayanan, V., Yang, Y., Zahra, S., (2009). Corporate venturing and value creation: a
review and proposed framework. Research Policy, forthcoming
Phan, P.H., Wright, M., Ucbasaran, D., Tan, W. (2009), Corporate entrepreneurship:
Current research and future directions, Journal of Business Venturing. 94, 197-205
Popper, M., Lipshitz, R. (1998), Organizational Learning Mechanisms: A structural and
cultural approach to organizational learning, The Jornal of Applied behavioural Science.
34(2), 161-179
Sharma, P., Chrisman, J.J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in
the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3),
11–28
Stuart, T. E., Ozdemir, S. Z., Ding, W. W., (2007), Vertical alliance networks: The case of
university-biotechnology-pharmaceutical alliance chains. Research Policy, 36(4), 477-498
Zahra, S.A. (1996). Goverance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The
moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Acadamy of Management
Journal, 39(6), 1713-1735
33
Bachelor Thesis Organization & Strategy Corporate Entrepreneurship
Zahra SA, Ireland RD, Hitt MA. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms:
international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance.
Academy of Management Journal, 43: 925–950
Zahra, S.A., Nielsen, A.P. and Bogner, W.C., (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship,
knowledge, and competence development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3),
169–189.
34
top related